CASE STUDY: 5 EZA Articles (Same Niche) Two Years Later - DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT RESULTS

by KateD
23 replies
This thread is for all of you Warriors like myself who gain knowledge and entertainment in reading case studies (both successes and failures).


Hey Guys.....


This case study is going to show you guys why you need to write and submit a large nuber of articles before being able to truly determine its effectiveness. For whatever reason, some articles will be duds (ie. low article views) and some will be superstars with lots of views.

And this happens even if you keep things equal between the articles. Some just do bettter than others.


My Case Study:

On February 18th, 2008, I had 5 articles go live in Ezinearticles.com. I have never done any backlinks at all to any of these articles.

Also:

- These 5 articles were not only written on the same niche, they were written on the same keyword phrase.

- They were all about the same word count (around 400 words)

- They all used the exact same author resource box

- They all were written in same format and style


In theory, after 2 years of publication, they should all have about the same number of article views and resource box link clicks, right?

Same keyword phrases targeted. Same fomat and style. Same resource box. No backlinks. Etc.

They should have similar stats, but those 5 articles have lived drastically different lives.


Here's an image from my Ezinearticles.com account for the pen name I used for these 5 articles:





Isn't that crazy? The stats between those articles are not even close. I wrote 5 articles around the same keyword phrase, and got results all over the board.

The difference between the stats of article #1 and #3 is massive!

There's really no rhyme or reason to it. Some of my articles seem to work better with Google's mythical algorithm than others. I mean, I knew that the stats would be identical, but I assumed they'd be close.

But they weren't close at.


Points To Be Take Away:

I have read numerous times how a marketer is giving up on article marketing after just a couple articles. But as you can see, even articles written around the same keyword phrase can have very different results.

What would have happened if I would have just written article #1 and based my success off of it? 58 views in over 2 years is horrible.

Many marketers do this exactly. They write and submit one article, and then based their ideas off of it.

To truly evaluate the effectiveness of article marketing, you need to write at least 10-20 articles minimum (just my opinion, not a commandment or anything).


Well, that's all I got. Hope some of your learned something. Hope some of you were entertained. Hope some of you had both experienced.


Keep At It Guys,

KateD
#articles #case #drastically #eza #niche #results #study #years
  • Profile picture of the author dannyadams
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988229].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988244].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Matt Bard
        [DELETED]
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988294].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author KateD
          Originally Posted by Matt M View Post

          Look at the Ezine Publisher column with 6. A few of those could have been pretty big ezine lists with loyal followers.
          But wouldn't they just post the article to their website/blog instead of just giving a link to my EZA article? (In which case it wouldn't affect my stats on EZA)

          Not saying that it isn't possible. I just don't think that's the reason for the differences in stats.

          KateD
          Signature
          Why Aren't You Making Money On Kindle With Erotica?


          --->I can also write other fiction (horror, romance, mystery, etc). Just ask me, I don't bite. :)
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988310].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author entrepreneurjay
    I agree its a grind to say the least. In my opinion when you are just starting out a new website, or blog article marketing is pretty much a necessity in my opinion.

    If you want to build up your new sites page rank, and backlinks article marketing is very effective for that. I would write an article submit it to ezinearticles for starters, wait for approval then submit that same one to Articlesbase.com, Goarticles.com. and Ideamarketers.com for starters.

    Even though I think article marketing is getting less and less effective in my opinion its still worth the trouble. Now that I have built up so many unique articles out there I love PLR articles if I am not in the mood to write a long unique article it gets mundane. PLR articles serve the same purpose, and they still get picked up by the search engines even though they are not unique.

    Nowadays I think blog commenting is even more effective than article marketing. Good post!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988273].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matt Bard
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988347].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Rod Cortez
      KateD,

      Thanx for sharing. I find posts like this refreshing because it's focused on talking about making money. Your generosity is much appreciated over here in the OC. I've noticed this too with some of my articles. I've had some picked up by Google, Yahoo, and Bing and all of the sudden one article gets thousands of views in a short period of time.

      I've seen one Warrior do a lot of work back linking to their articles on EZA, Goarticles, and a couple other directories and they've managed to hold onto page one of Google for a long, long time. Submitting to articles is only the beginning, it's what you do afterwards that can really boost your article traffic (examples: putting it on your blog, back linking, using press releases to drive more links and traffic, submitting the RSS feeds to directories, placing a batch of your articles into a PDF and submitting to ebook directories).

      RoD


      RoD
      Signature
      "Your personal philosophy is the greatest determining factor in how your life works out."
      - Jim Rohn
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988382].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Rod Cortez View Post

        KateD,

        Thanx for sharing. I find posts like this refreshing because it's focused on talking about making money.

        RoD
        Except that she didn't mention a single thing about these articles making her any money.

        By the way, a quick calculation shows these 5 articles are bringing about 2 visitors to her site per day.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988939].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Rod Cortez
          Originally Posted by Black Hat Cat View Post

          Except that she didn't mention a single thing about these articles making her any money.

          By the way, a quick calculation shows these 5 articles are bringing about 2 visitors to her site per day.
          Thanks for stating the obvious. But clearly, people in this forum use articles to obtain traffic which leads to sales, commisions, etc. so it's information that people can use. The main point she was making is very relevant to making money. One does not have to directly talk about making money for it to be beneficial.

          RoD
          Signature
          "Your personal philosophy is the greatest determining factor in how your life works out."
          - Jim Rohn
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1992332].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rob Howard
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988581].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author x3xsolxdierx3x
      Originally Posted by ccmusicman View Post

      You know what I take away from this?

      That you can see failure after failure...but if you continue to do the right things, enough times...eventually "luck" will side with you.

      It's like Edison with the light bulb. He went through thousands of "failures" until he hit gold.

      You obviously where doing the right things, and given enough time, something was bound to click!

      Rob
      He was a pioneer and, I believe, had to 'fail' a few thousand times....

      Even though technology is certainly still evolving (along with things like Google's Algorithm), I think people can significantly decrease their chance of 'failure' if they consult the right people and places. Of course, some people spend a lifetime looking for the right people and places.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1991496].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author x3xsolxdierx3x
        Another thing I had observed from your original post....

        Unless they were the exact same article, with the exact same word placement, any alteration in wording could really lend itself to impacting the success or failure of an article in one way or another.

        This gets complicated.

        But, all articles should be written with latent semantic indexing/analysis and SEO in mind. It appears like you skimmed the surface with SEO, but, could go even deeper to make the other articles approach your results with your #3 article.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1991504].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
          This is really not nearly as unusual as you think. In fact, it is more than norm
          than anything else.

          Each article has variables to it and those variables affect how many views
          you get.

          I have a niche where some articles have over 30,000 views in a few years
          while other articles haven't even broken 4 figures yet.

          The title, the keywords, the competition for the niche...all those things are
          going to affect your views.

          I'd be more surprised if you showed me a list where every article got almost
          the same number of views...unless of course they were all close to zero.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1991531].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author 1960Texan
    In my experience the headline has more to do with article views than anything else. Granted, a high CTR is the ultimate goal, but you won't get any clicks without someone first reading the article. Great topic.

    Will
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1988971].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LiamMcIvorMartin
    Is that the average of losers vs winners? I.E. 1 out of every 5 articles usually gets you real traffic while the others are duds?
    Signature

    In Times Of Change, Learners Inherit The Earth

    Liam McIvor Martin

    Outsourced Facebook Marketing

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1989046].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author KateD
      Originally Posted by LiamMcIvorMartin View Post

      Is that the average of losers vs winners? I.E. 1 out of every 5 articles usually gets you real traffic while the others are duds?
      LOL!

      No, there are no averages. There are just too many factors involved to say that 1 in 5 articles will be superstars.

      KateD
      Signature
      Why Aren't You Making Money On Kindle With Erotica?


      --->I can also write other fiction (horror, romance, mystery, etc). Just ask me, I don't bite. :)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1991467].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author x3xsolxdierx3x
        There is a science to article writing.

        Never would I ever publish one and just hope it "Sticks" and ends up like #3.

        There are ways that one can greatly increase their 'luck' and reduce their chance at having even one article fail.

        p.s. Just a general note about word count, I have found that 1,000 word articles general do the best. (Just in my experience....besides some may not be able to write that much about any one topic)....

        The idea is that many think that Google weights 'time on site' or time viewing an article very highly in it's algorithm....the assumption is that a longer article would have a much higher quality and content (not always the case, I know), it would lead people to become more actively engaged and interested, and therefore spend more time on the site/article=showing the search engines that it is 'valuable'...

        Of course you can poke holes in the above logic, but, for the most part, many of my longer articles do better than my shorter articles.....

        I would be interested in seeing you repeat this with all 1,000 word articles. Would you?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1991490].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sarah Russell
    Interesting stats, for sure, but the thing that's missing for me from the original post is the number of sales that each article resulted in. That much variation between views isn't that far out of the ordinary (maybe article 3 wound up ranked for a more popular keyword than the others), but more views & clicks doesn't mean much if the visitors don't convert.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1991817].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steven Downward
    WOW KateD
    That is a massive change between the 5 different articles. Thanks for sharing that.
    I also liked what you said about not giving up after you write just one article. I know for myself, I didn't write my first successful article for about 3 months after I started writing articles and then I didn't know that it was a success for about 2 months after that. If I had stopped writing before that time, I would have never made the money that I have from it.
    Crazy
    Signature
    Jonathan Budd's 7 Figure Networker System, What's The Truth?
    How To Start An Online Business - Indepth Article Teaching You How With No Money
    Steven Downward's Personal Blog - Stories Of A Traveling Entrepreneur
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1992062].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author gamefan
      It is a good case study. Thanks for sharing.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1992235].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tylerdrun
    Do you mean writing 10 articles targetting the same keyword? I'm at fault and going to start working all over once more.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1992313].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author aa411853
    Thanks for sharing Kate!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1992890].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MarWillis
    Thanks for sharing this. It encourages me in my own article marketing efforts.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2022618].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author actionplanbiz
    thanks for sharing, great points, your case study is definitely a perfect example and it greatly assists others motivation
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2022665].message }}

Trending Topics