Don't Teach People How To Make Money On A .info domain...

162 replies
I keep seeing this again & again. Today I was browsing
on twitter and stumbled upon a profile of a person
that claimed he's a millionaire from internet
marketing.

I check out his website (which sells an IM product)
and it's a .info domain.

Are you serious? I truly don't know if I should cry or laugh
at something like this.

If you really are rich then you won't bother with a .info domain,
unless you own the .com domain and want to buy all the tlds.

Don't use .info domains if you're going to set up a website
that teaches people how to make money. It's a total turn
off.

The first thing that comes to my mind when I see something
like this is:

"So this guy is rich and he can't even afford a $9 domain?"


.info domains look highly unprofessional.

Use .coms, they're the best domains, and if you think that it's
not worth it to invest $9 for your success, then forget setting up
a business, and go get a 9-5.

Cheers,
Johnny


EDIT: Before you start reading know that I don't recommend a
.info domain for selling a product that teaches people how to
make money. That's all. That's my point.

I can't provide real proof that .coms work better than .infos
in the IM niche, but the people who are saying that they don't
make a difference don't have proof either.

So... you decide.
#domain #info #make #money #people #teach
  • Profile picture of the author advertisingmonstor
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170636].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jimleaf2010
      Banned
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175508].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ExRat
        Hi IMheadlines,

        .coms are easier for people to remember, so even if there would be no difference in the conversion rate, .coms will still be worth it since when people remember a websites name, normally they will type it in with a .com in the end.
        Perhaps they do 'normally', but it's worth considering that many people just type 'thephrase' - without any extension, into the address bar - and then the default search engine decides who to present at number one spot (or just sends you there) - it would appear that the site that is most likely to be the one best representing that phrase (in the opinion of the SE) wins - regardless of the extension.

        If someone remembered a domain from somewhere, but had no idea of the extension - are they more likely to try dot com or leave it extensionless?
        Signature


        Roger Davis

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175743].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sipboy3000
    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

    I keep seeing this again & again. Today I was browsing
    on twitter and stumbled upon a profile of a person
    that claimed he's a millionaire from internet
    marketing.

    I check out his website (which sells an IM product)
    and it's a .info domain.

    Are you serious? I truly don't know if I should cry or laugh
    at something like this.

    If you really are rich then you won't bother with a .info domain,
    unless you own the .com domain and want to buy all the tlds.

    Don't use .info domains if you're going to set up a website
    that teaches people how to make money. It's a total turn
    off.

    The first thing that comes to my mind when I see something
    like this is:

    "So this guy is rich and he can't even afford a $9 domain?"


    .info domains look highly unprofessional.

    Use .coms, they're the best domains, and if you think that it's
    not worth it to invest $9 for your success, then forget setting up
    a business, and go get a 9-5.

    Cheers,
    Johnny
    LOL!

    I saw someone the other day with a similar story.

    Using a .info domain and claiming to be a millionaire Internet Marketer.

    I laughed because it was funny.

    On the other hand, a quick search revealed everything I needed to know about this guy and I can tell he is a fake.

    I feel sorry for anyone who takes advice from this guy.

    People like this is what gives our community a black eye.

    And yes, I also agree that it looks unprofessional if you are using it for branding your image.

    My 2 cents
    Signature

    Nothing here to see

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170655].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
      yet we tell people to build sites on free places all the time: Blogger, WordPress.com. Squidoo, Weebly...etc...

      maybe his .info site is a backlink to his main site?
      the .info tld is perfect for informational sites so if his site is a informational site about making money, I see nothing wrong with this.
      Signature
      ---------------
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170678].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
        Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

        I dont think you know the whole story here.

        Is this his MAIN site?

        You know that many marketers use *.info - there is nothing wrong with it, and honestly, no one cares once your .info is #1 in Google.

        Go type "traffic ultimatum" in Google. Doubt he is making lots of money?

        Reasons to take info:

        If *.com is taken you can get a .info and use "exact keyword domain" for rankings, provided its still available.

        I take .info over .biz any day provided the .com is taken. I also dont thnik that *.info would be worse than .org

        Yes, it's his MAIN site. The .com was available.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170700].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
          Originally Posted by Karen Blundell View Post

          the .info tld is perfect for informational sites so if his site is a informational site about making money, I see nothing wrong with this.

          Did you read my OP?

          Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

          I check out his website (which sells an IM product)
          and it's a .info domain.
          A product that supposedly teaches you how he became
          a millionaire... :rolleyes:

          And I'll say it again, the .com was available.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170721].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
            Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

            Did you read my OP?



            A product that supposedly teaches you how he became
            a millionaire... :rolleyes:

            And I'll say it again, the .com was available.
            yes, I read your OP, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with you.
            just like Caliban (CDarklock) posted I buy .info tld's if I want certain keywords in the domain name and the .com or .net are not available.
            Signature
            ---------------
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171715].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author AndrewCavanagh
      Originally Posted by Sipboy3000 View Post

      People like this is what gives our community a black eye.

      I'm curious about how you give a community a black eye...lol.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173061].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    I dont think you know the whole story here.

    Is this his MAIN site?

    You know that many marketers use *.info - there is nothing wrong with it, and honestly, no one cares once your .info is #1 in Google.

    Go type "traffic ultimatum" in Google. Doubt he is making lots of money?

    Reasons to take info:

    If *.com is taken you can get a .info and use "exact keyword domain" for rankings, provided its still available.

    I take .info over .biz any day provided the .com is taken. I also dont thnik that *.info would be worse than .org
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170658].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ninja_va
    Just read a quote on WF

    "People who don't know - teach"

    Sadly, open source and social media have unintentionally ended up lowering the barrier to entry to such an extent that we suddenly have these thousands of fake IM millionaires, fake social media experts, fake seo experts and fake IM gurus.

    I'd tweet @ the ".info millionaire" to spend 10 bucks on getting a .com TLD and a few bucks more on books like "All Marketeers are Liars" by Seth Godin
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170672].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LB
    Why even bother checking?

    If someone feels the need to say, "I'm a millionaire!" on Twitter, their credibility is pretty much over the moment I read that.
    Signature
    Tired of Article Marketing, Backlink Spamming and Other Crusty Old Traffic Methods?

    Click Here.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170718].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
      Originally Posted by LB View Post

      Why even bother checking?

      If someone feels the need to say, "I'm a millionaire!" on Twitter, their credibility is pretty much over the moment I read that.
      You would be surprised...why do you think every guru and their mama uses those teaser-lines?
      Signature
      *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
      -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
      *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
      Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175355].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JayPeete
    I'm with you Johnny. Amateur!
    Signature
    What Misunderstood Traffic Source SUCKS In
    3 Million Visitors Daily and Spits Out
    $560.81 Per Day In Commissions?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170755].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author paulie888
    If you're selling an IM product and your main site is a .info domain, your credibility will definitely be put in question, and if you're going to put all that effort into getting your site ranked no. 1 in Google and elsewhere, is it really worth the risk just to save the $8 or so (from not buying the .com domain)?
    Signature
    >>> Features Jason Fladlien, John S. Rhodes, Justin Brooke, Sean I. Mitchell, Reed Floren and Brad Gosse! <<<
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170760].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Shannon Herod
    Here's one important thing that you need to note...

    You found this link on twitter. Is it possible that the .info is a tracking link? So he can see what traffic he is getting from twitter?

    There could be 1000 possibilities on why that particular product owner is using a .info domain. Could this be someone that cannot afford a regular domain? Maybe. But could this be a legit business that is tracking their traffic through a .info domain name? Could be. You'll never know unless you do more research.

    That's like saying all tall people are good at basketball because you know a tall person that's good a basketball. You need more information to judge whether that person is good at basketball or not.

    Just because you think .info names are used because the person cannot afford a .com domain name does not mean that it is a truth across the board.

    Shannon Herod
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170839].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
      Originally Posted by Shannon Herod View Post

      Here's one important thing that you need to note...

      You found this link on twitter. Is it possible that the .info is a tracking link? So he can see what traffic he is getting from twitter?

      There could be 1000 possibilities on why that particular product owner is using a .info domain. Could this be someone that cannot afford a regular domain? Maybe. But could this be a legit business that is tracking their traffic through a .info domain name? Could be. You'll never know unless you do more research.
      It doesn't matter what the reason behind buying
      a .info was.

      The conversion rate will get lower if you sell
      an IM product on a .info domain. That was my
      point.

      Me, and several other people will close the salespage
      immediately if it's on a .info domain. So why not sell
      the product on a .com domain to make more sales.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170896].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author George Wright
        Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

        Me, and several other people will close the salespage
        immediately if it's on a .info domain. So why not sell
        the product on a .com domain to make more sales.
        On the other hand me and several other people don't care. And both of our groups are not even a speck of dust in the sea of buyers on the internet.

        George Wright
        Signature
        "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170984].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
          Originally Posted by George Wright View Post

          On the other hand me and several other people don't care. And both of our groups are not even a speck of dust in the sea of buyers on the internet.

          George Wright
          So you're saying it doesn't make a difference whether you sell
          an IM product on a .info or .com?

          Well it does...

          Even if a .com gets you only one more sale in a years time,
          it would still be worth it if you earn more than $9 per sale.

          Why the heck would you want to use a .info anyway, to save
          $8 a year? jeez.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171023].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
            Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

            Why the heck would you want to use a .info anyway, to save $8 a year? jeez.
            To get the exact keywords you want in your domain.

            mykeywordphrase.com - taken.
            mykeywordphrase.net - taken.
            mykeywordphrase.org - taken.
            mykeywordphrase.us - taken.
            mykeywordphrase.me - taken.

            mykeywordphrase.info - available.

            I've invested an hour or more of research in this keyword phrase. Do I throw that away, or do I get the .info domain?

            It's not always about the money.
            Signature
            "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171094].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
              Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

              To get the exact keywords you want in your domain.
              Well you can use them for a lot of stuff. But I wouldn't use a .info
              to sell an IM product, especially if the .com is available!
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171144].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Michael Thorsett
              Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

              To get the exact keywords you want in your domain.

              mykeywordphrase.com - taken.
              mykeywordphrase.net - taken.
              mykeywordphrase.org - taken.
              mykeywordphrase.us - taken.
              mykeywordphrase.me - taken.

              mykeywordphrase.info - available.

              I've invested an hour or more of research in this keyword phrase. Do I throw that away, or do I get the .info domain?

              It's not always about the money.
              I own a couple of .info domains; my main concern is that people will remember the domain name but when they type it in, they'll automatically end it with .com -- and I lose traffic.

              Of course, this only applies to non-link marketing of the site. (But you all do market your sites both on- and offline, right? )
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171415].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
            Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

            So you're saying it doesn't make a difference whether you sell
            an IM product on a .info or .com?

            Well it does...
            the only thing that matters is whether the site has something to offer that people want...
            I've seen many crappy .com sites and I've seen many fantastic .info sites

            'nuff said...
            Signature
            ---------------
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171742].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Frank Donovan
              Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

              I never said that you guys shouldn't use .info
              domains. I said that you shouldn't sell an IM product on
              a .info.
              Also, I started this thread to help people, not to start a
              debate. By selling an IM product on a .info you'll lose
              sales...
              But what if that IM product was about the benefits of using a .info TLD? :confused:



              Frank
              Signature


              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171787].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Harrison Ortega
                So, you are teaching us that if we sell an IM product on an .Info domain, we're going to be: (paraphrasing what you and some others have said so far) unprofessional, scammer, funny, laughable, liar, amateur, spammer, full of crap, cheap and newbie. All of that just because selling an IM product on an .info domain? WOW.

                Can you post a non live link to this crucified guy? I am wondering if he really deserves to be called all that just because a type of domain.
                Signature
                NJ web design / NJ Web Designer. MY Wordpress portfolio. 10 years of HTML/CSS - 6 years developing professional Wordpress websites. Currently not available for services.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171793].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author George Wright
            Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

            So you're saying it doesn't make a difference whether you sell
            an IM product on a .info or .com?

            Well it does...

            Even if a .com gets you only one more sale in a years time,
            it would still be worth it if you earn more than $9 per sale.

            Why the heck would you want to use a .info anyway, to save
            $8 a year? jeez.
            Some don't save only $8. Some save $80, $800, 8,000, etc. Not everyone only buys 1 URL At a time.

            George Wright
            Signature
            "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171860].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
            Banned
            Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

            So you're saying it doesn't make a difference whether you sell
            an IM product on a .info or .com?

            Well it does...

            Even if a .com gets you only one more sale in a years time,
            it would still be worth it if you earn more than $9 per sale.
            None of which has anything to with whether one can earn a million dollars with a .info domain.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171875].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TimG
        Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

        It doesn't matter what the reason behind buying
        a .info was.

        The conversion rate will get lower if you sell
        an IM product on a .info domain. That was my
        point.

        Me, and several other people will close the salespage
        immediately if it's on a .info domain. So why not sell
        the product on a .com domain to make more sales.
        That's probably a valid point you are making but it could also be that you and the other folks are not this marketer's intended audience.

        Everyday people are scammed out of money via bogus email messages - I'm pretty sure those same folks have no idea what the difference is between a .info and a .com.

        Also, I thought I read a post by Tiffany Dow not to long ago that basically showed there was little difference between the .info and the .com domain to the common web surfer (Tiffany please correct me if I am wrong - ).

        Sometimes we need to distance how we think from how the non-Internet marketer thinks.

        Respectfully,
        Tim
        Signature
        Article Marketing Soldiers - The Best Selling Article Marketing Product On The Warrior Forum Is Now Looking For Affiliates! Make Over $25 Per Sale With This High Converting Product.

        Make More Money And Spend More Time With Your Family By Becoming A Scentsy Consultant - I Provide Personal Assistance And Help With Growing Your Business.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171873].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author George Wright
    Some people actually believe what you say in your sig (I for one) and for that philosophy .info is fine.

    George Wright

    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

    I keep seeing this again & again. Today I was browsing
    on twitter and stumbled upon a profile of a person
    that claimed he's a millionaire from internet
    marketing.

    I check out his website (which sells an IM product)
    and it's a .info domain.

    Are you serious? I truly don't know if I should cry or laugh
    at something like this.

    If you really are rich then you won't bother with a .info domain,
    unless you own the .com domain and want to buy all the tlds.

    Don't use .info domains if you're going to set up a website
    that teaches people how to make money. It's a total turn
    off.

    The first thing that comes to my mind when I see something
    like this is:

    "So this guy is rich and he can't even afford a $9 domain?"


    .info domains look highly unprofessional.

    Use .coms, they're the best domains, and if you think that it's
    not worth it to invest $9 for your success, then forget setting up
    a business, and go get a 9-5.

    Cheers,
    Johnny
    Signature
    "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2170932].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author brieat
    .info got a bad rep because it costed $1 to get it a while back (1 year?) through host daddy and name cheap. Nowadays it cost the same as .com domain

    I also seen government fund websites using .info domain. True be told, the general public doesn't know that .info cost $1 and .com cost $10
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171035].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seobro
    OK in the minds of most people .info domain equals spam and scam. That is because they were often sold for 99 cents by many domain sellers and even a penny. Therefore many MFA - made for sadsense web sites used .info domains back in the day, but most have started to wise up. Therefore .info still carries a stigma and should not be use.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171060].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sleaklight
    To you and me and all marketers around know the difference in value between a .com and .info but if an average joe lands on it, odds is he or she is going to assume .info = information and is going to read the info on it as information versus a "o this is a website trying to sell me something" mentality. I've conducted market research on this with about 75 participants and the majority of them responded that way when surveyed.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171072].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
      Originally Posted by Sleaklight View Post

      To you and me and all marketers around know the difference in value between a .com and .info but if an average joe lands on it, odds is he or she is going to assume .info = information and is going to read the info on it as information versus a "o this is a website trying to sell me something" mentality. I've conducted market research on this with about 75 participants and the majority of them responded that way when surveyed.
      Good post.

      Remember that I said that you shouldn't sell an IM
      product on a .info domain, not a product in another niche.
      Although I still recommend .com.

      Most people who buy IM products do know the difference
      between .com and .info.

      It doesn't really make a difference though, it's not worth it to
      use a .info instead of a .com when the difference in the price is
      just about $8.

      Cheers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171124].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author dwaser
        I'm not sure if a lot of people know the difference between a .com and other tld's.
        I have an IM related blog on a .net domain and receive several complains every day about the IM product sold on the .com domain. So those people have been looking for a product about making money online and landed on that .com domain. They signed up for a trial and after the trial period they get charged the full amount. So they are not happy about that and do a search in Google.

        Now since my .net ranks higher than the .com they visit my site (and I don't sell anything myself on the site, it's just an affiliate site), write me an email and complaining about that they got charged for the full amount.

        This shows me everyday, that people don't know what kind of site they visited and where they entered their credit card details.

        I think if you have an IM product for newbies, it doesn't matter so much because most of them don't know the difference.

        These are just my 2 cents.

        Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

        Good post.

        Remember that I said that you shouldn't sell an IM
        product on a .info domain, not a product in another niche.
        Although I still recommend .com.

        Most people who buy IM products do know the difference
        between .com and .info.

        It doesn't really make a difference though, it's not worth it to
        use a .info instead of a .com when the difference in the price is
        just about $8.

        Cheers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171291].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Barry Patterson
      Thanks for a great discussion re. .info domain. I learned a lot from the various points of view. I bought an .info once because it was cheap. But the domain .com was already purchased by some one else. Your discussion has revealed to me that .info does not necessarily mean what it says. However, I am not sure that everybody understands your point of being cheap. How many of the millions of people out there understand the difference?
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171133].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
        Originally Posted by Barry Patterson View Post

        How many of the millions of people out there understand the difference?

        Not many, but several people who work online do, so you're obviously
        going to look a little bit fake to the IM crowd when you claim you're
        rich & sell an IM product on a .info domain.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171169].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author PatriciaJ
      Originally Posted by Sleaklight View Post

      To you and me and all marketers around know the difference in value between a .com and .info but if an average joe lands on it, odds is he or she is going to assume .info = information and is going to read the info on it as information versus a "o this is a website trying to sell me something" mentality. I've conducted market research on this with about 75 participants and the majority of them responded that way when surveyed.
      I agree with this, most newbies would believe that a domain infering information is good for just that. That's if they even notice if it's a .com or .info

      Although I prefer .co.uk I own several .infos and .coms chosen because of the keywords I've researched. I've never not been able to afford a .com and even if I do buy a cheap .info I know that offers are there to draw people in and that the price will rise when I renew.

      Maybe the .com wasn't available when he bought the .info
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171239].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
    IM Headlines,
    What you know about how you feel is what matters to you, Right?

    What this person may know about what works and what doesn't matters to them, Right?

    You may not be their target audience and on top of that you're into IM so you read
    through things like this with ease, Right?

    Have you ever been wrong?

    Maybe the reason is more than you can comprehend. Because he isn't targeting you and we all
    know that the general public doesn't give a Rat's Arse if they get info from a .com, .net, .org or
    even .info. They want info about what they are searching for.

    Most non-IMers just don't know the difference. Therefore the point is YES he/she
    should have used a .com if it was available although maybe they didn't have a warm
    fuzzy feeling about it for what ever reason.

    OK, I'm done...lol

    If the .com is available then I would buy it and hold onto it for a while till
    he/she decides they want it just for sh!ts and giggles.

    Who knows, maybe they will make you an offer later!

    Have a Great Day!
    Michael
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171151].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
      Originally Posted by Michael Mayo View Post

      Maybe the reason is more than you can comprehend. Because he isn't targeting you
      Nope his target audience are IMers like me, that's why it's so
      funny.



      Originally Posted by Michael Mayo View Post

      Who knows, maybe they will make you an offer later!
      Lol. I seriously doubt that!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171186].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Superform
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171179].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MatthewM
      You make a very good point.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171182].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
    I keep seeing this again & again. Today I was browsing
    on twitter and stumbled upon a profile of a person
    that claimed he's a millionaire from internet
    marketing.

    I check out his website (which sells an IM product)
    and it's a .info domain.

    Are you serious? I truly don't know if I should cry or laugh
    at something like this.

    If you really are rich then you won't bother with a .info domain,
    unless you own the .com domain and want to buy all the tlds.

    Don't use .info domains if you're going to set up a website
    that teaches people how to make money. It's a total turn
    off.

    The first thing that comes to my mind when I see something
    like this is:

    "So this guy is rich and he can't even afford a $9 domain?"


    .info domains look highly unprofessional.

    Use .coms, they're the best domains, and if you think that it's
    not worth it to invest $9 for your success, then forget setting up
    a business, and go get a 9-5.
    Hogwash.

    There is nothing wrong with a .info

    Some of your points may be vaild and the person is probably full of crap (most are) but that has nothing to do with the value of a .info domain.

    .com's may be the preferred TDL to own and I do think they have their benefits but that doesn't mean they are better. Yes, .info's have a spammy reputation within the IM and webmaster community, doesn't mean my grandma thinks this or even has a clue about what a .com, .info etc... really is.

    Maybe the person is a millionaire, maybe you really do make $1,100 a month from IM. You have a .com but that doesn't mean I believe you either.
    Signature

    I'm all about that bass.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171202].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
      I never said that you guys shouldn't use .info
      domains. I said that you shouldn't sell an IM product on
      a .info.

      Also, I started this thread to help people, not to start a
      debate. By selling an IM product on a .info you'll lose
      sales...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171266].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author reynoldscorb
    I don't see a problem in using a .info. I have websites ending in .com, .org, .net, .info, and .us. One of my best performing sites ends in .us.

    There are a lot of cons to using a domain ending other than .com, but I can hardly see how someone using a .info is something to laugh about especially if it works for them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171205].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
    Well, This thread is pretty much useless with out any real reference to back up the story.

    Hell, We can set here and agree to disagree all day long and you will win because I have
    no way to verify what you seen is what we are talking about...lol

    This is to open ended for me to debate.

    Have a Great Day!
    Michael

    PS. Don't PM me the info(pun intended)either as I'm leaving to eat dinner at
    this time.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171215].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ryan D
    Banned
    Maybe he bought the .info domain before he knew any better. I bought and built a big site authority site on a .org domain. Who cares?

    I wouldn't read too much into it. It doesn't seem like a big deal to me.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171221].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
    Maybe... just maybe...

    He doesn't actually care?.
    Signature

    Bare Murkage.........

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171272].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Damien Roche
    Yeh, I do find it amateur too but appearances can be deceiving. Like some people mentioned above, there may be a valid reason for using a .info domain..but the fact that people are coming up with REASONS to use a .info domain says it all.

    It's like, I don't really take people seriously who use a hotmail email address. I would laugh my tits off if I got an email from:

    frankkern@hotmail.com

    ..c'mon. gmail is minimum.

    BUT, again, appearances can be deceiving. Maybe they've used their hotmail address for 6 years and it's too much bother to switch.

    I get your point though. I don't think I'd ever try to build a product on a .info domain. Personal choice and opinion. That's all.
    Signature
    >> Seasoned Web Developer (CSS, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby) <<
    Available for Fixed Fee Projects and Hourly ($40/hr)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171277].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
      Originally Posted by Damien Roche View Post


      frankkern@hotmail.com

      ..c'mon. gmail is minimum.
      So...

      Let me get this straight

      BOTH of those services are free.. but you automatically give gmail more "respect" over hotmail?...

      You'd laugh if a marketer sent you mail with a hotmail addy, but if it was gmail, then not so much... how strange.

      I know gmail is a better service on the whole. But they are both "free", so imho, should have the same stigma attached to them, no?..

      This thread is weird.
      Signature

      Bare Murkage.........

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171305].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Damien Roche
        Originally Posted by JayXtreme View Post

        So...

        Let me get this straight

        BOTH of those services are free.. but you automatically give gmail more "respect" over hotmail?...

        You'd laugh if a marketer sent you mail with a hotmail addy, but if it was gmail, then not so much... how strange.

        I know gmail is a better service on the whole. But they are both "free", so imho, should have the same stigma attached to them, no?..
        Again, it's just personal choice and opinion. I can be arrogant about the small stuff, I don't care. My head's firmly focused on the big picture

        But to explain the logic behind my opinion - I guess it would be because hotmail seems less professional. It isn't aimed at professionals and doesn't cater to professionals in features so therefore somebody who primarily uses this address...isn't...ya know...professional...?

        Exactly, it's stupid. But it's just my opinion. Don't let it carry any weight. This is small stuff.
        Signature
        >> Seasoned Web Developer (CSS, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby) <<
        Available for Fixed Fee Projects and Hourly ($40/hr)
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171322].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
          Originally Posted by Damien Roche View Post

          Don't let it carry any weight. This is small stuff.
          I must rush off to grab myself a gmail addy right now!
          Signature

          Bare Murkage.........

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171329].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Damien Roche
            Originally Posted by JayXtreme View Post

            I must rush off to grab myself a gmail addy right now!
            Ahhh...wonderful, fresh, gust of sarcasm.
            Signature
            >> Seasoned Web Developer (CSS, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby) <<
            Available for Fixed Fee Projects and Hourly ($40/hr)
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171348].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author PatriciaJ
      Originally Posted by Damien Roche View Post

      Yeh, I do find it amateur too but appearances can be deceiving. Like some people mentioned above, there may be a valid reason for using a .info domain..but the fact that people are coming up with REASONS to use a .info domain says it all.

      It's like, I don't really take people seriously who use a hotmail email address. I would laugh my tits off if I got an email from:

      frankkern@hotmail.com

      ..c'mon. gmail is minimum.

      BUT, again, appearances can be deceiving. Maybe they've used their hotmail address for 6 years and it's too much bother to switch.

      I get your point though. I don't think I'd ever try to build a product on a .info domain. Personal choice and opinion. That's all.
      I'm one of those who have used an hotmail addy for business for about 10 years and nobody has ever laughed any part of their body off - maybe scratched their heads because of the nutty part that precedes @hotmail.com

      I had a posh addy first but it got spammed to death and it was hard to find my orders and enquiries amongst the junk. Hotmail stops a lot of that. I don't want to switch and not because it's too much bother. I like my hotmail addy.

      But blimey I've got 2 gmails for article marketing and networking so maybe I can be taken a bit more seriously
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171530].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author AllAboutAction
        Originally Posted by PatriciaJ View Post

        Electronic Cigarettes helped me to quit smoking after 40 years - brilliant!
        I have to say, you look much better than I would have expected from someone who smoked for 40 years.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172650].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author PatriciaJ
          Originally Posted by AllAboutAction View Post

          I have to say, you look much better than I would have expected from someone who smoked for 40 years.
          Thank you. I have inherited great skin from my mother and have always looked younger than I am. I took that picture with my camcorder last year when I was tarted up for a night out with the girls. I also had one taken the morning after but vanity made me choose the picture that I'm using.

          I guess that it's another one of those how we perceive things questions. Should I have that in my sig when I don't look old enough in that photo for it to be true? I remember putting that in my sig because I was so darn chuffed that I'd stopped, maybe it's time to change it but it has created curiousity.

          I am actually 55 years old and started smoking regularly when I was 14.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173211].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steve Ranger
    I can't even remember the last time I went on a .info website. It was a disgrace really - they blatantly released them for a quick buck.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171297].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bgmacaw
      Originally Posted by Steve Ranger View Post

      I can't even remember the last time I went on a .info website. It was a disgrace really - they blatantly released them for a quick buck.
      <sigh>

      Once again, for the enjoyment and education of all, Google on these terms...

      pagerank checker
      Noam Chomsky
      roman coins
      new york transit
      craft ideas
      regular expressions
      move your money
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171537].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Steve Ranger
        Originally Posted by bgmacaw View Post

        pagerank checker
        Noam Chomsky
        roman coins
        new york transit
        craft ideas
        regular expressions
        move your money
        Can't you just summarise your point into a small paragraph?

        summarise
        point
        paragraph



        I've read a lot of Noam Chomsky by the way. Good stuff.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171548].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
          Originally Posted by Steve Ranger View Post

          Can't you just summarise your point into a small paragraph?
          bgmacaw is leaving it up to others to work it out for themselves...

          Doesn't wanna waste time. I can understand that, people don't listen any ways.
          Signature

          Bare Murkage.........

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171597].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Steve Ranger
            Originally Posted by JayXtreme View Post

            bgmacaw is leaving it up to others to work it out for themselves...

            Doesn't wanna waste time. I can understand that, people don't listen any ways.
            Well he has wasted time now.. yours.. and mine.. hmm.. time to get back to making money I think!

            How much is it to register a .info :p
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171614].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
              Originally Posted by Steve Ranger View Post

              Well he has wasted time now.. yours.. and mine.. hmm.. time to get back to making money I think!

              How much is it to register a .info :p
              He's not wasted mine.. I already undersood the point being made
              Signature

              Bare Murkage.........

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171618].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Steve Ranger
                Originally Posted by JayXtreme View Post

                He's not wasted mine.. I already undersood the point being made
                You're wasting your time arguing about it.

                To be honest.. I really have no idea what he is going about.. Roman coins? LOL. I don't have the time to go Googling keyword after keyword :p

                Seriously though, back on subject. That extension got seriously tarnished back in the day by spammers - it was the one domain they used extensively

                Edit: Just seen that second place SERP listing for 'roman coins', that's pretty impressive. That site must have a lot of authority links coming in etc..
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171655].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                  Originally Posted by Steve Ranger View Post

                  it was the one domain they used extensively
                  It was the one domain you could get without providing valid identification, at the time. Today they can get whatever the hell they want.
                  Signature
                  "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171672].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author genietoast
            I've used .info to cloak and mask and affiliate links for Ezine Article Purposes, but my main site has been a .com or a .net.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171693].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author zerofill
            For those knocking the .info domains you're not the type of people to use a gmail account or a yahoo account for your main email either are you?

            Jeremy uses a yahoo account more than our normal email accounts... Why? Cause he likes it I dunno why lol... I use a normal email client..thunderbird to be exact and pop email. But it hasn't affected us either way...

            If you think an .info domain affects your sales...you might lose 2 out of a 100 marketers you are targeting in the "make money online" niche... I can just about guarantee it won't affect your non make money online cash... I seriously doubt if the product or offer is good it will have any affect really. But I know the person looking for a cure for acne could care less.

            The only reason I don't use them for much more than redirects is because of Google... It is normally much harder to rank a .info domain...for me anyway. The biggest reason why as far as I can tell is probably because the cost of them is too cheap. So they are spammer abused to death. So you have to prove yourself a bit more when running a real site on a .info domain. So it goes without saying Google would take that into account. Yahoo however doesn't seem to care if it is a .info.

            For landing pages I am driving traffic to via ppc or article marketing or whatever...I could care less if the extension is .cxdfgrtdf lol

            Type: make money online

            into google...think that guy is an idiot for using a blogger blog? I mean blahblahblah.blogspot.com

            looks a lot more unprofessional to me then makemoneyonline.info or whatever hehe...

            Doubt he is worried about being a blogger blog in the top spot for that phrase though...

            So who knows how he (the guy you are talking about) is mainly driving traffic... I kind of doubt it would be only twitter crap...but might be.

            Now if he has it ranking for some solid, tough keyword phrases in Google...you might want to give him the benefit of the doubt and look more at what he is offering.

            I would do a lot more digging if I was actually interested in finding out if he was a scammer or not... I would probably drop any preconceived "he is dumb" notion unless I had more to go on then just he has a .info domain.
            Signature
            Serp Shaker
            The IM World Will Be Shaken to the Core!
            Join my list at: IMCool.Biz
            New Podcast --> podcast.imcool.biz
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173297].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author GerryMedia
            The sad thing about .info domains is they have been used by spammers and "adsense farms" a lot, otherwise I don't see anything wrong in a .info domain if indeed the website contains relevant information about the keywords in the domain name.
            Signature

            I.M. ControlPanel - See why this online software is your key to success!
            Lifetime Membership WSO

            Learn. Take Action. Learn. Teach.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2174939].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
              Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

              This is the only argument you've made that holds any water, and it only matters for people who need to remember the domain name. There are an awful lot of circumstances in which that's not a consideration.

              It's also questionable how long that will remain true, since .info makes more sense to the mind than .com. Not to mention that people are becoming more aware of extensions and the like as they get familiar with the net.
              Paul touched on a point I was going to make. The line between .com, .org, and .net sites and the rest isn't nearly wide as it was just a few years ago. At some point, when the number of .info sites reaches a certain saturation point, few people will consider it a difference worth noting. It will come to that point sooner or later because of the limited number of desirable keywords available in any given niche, and I think that point isn't that far out.

              At that point, buying a .info domain with top keyword choices will be as difficult as buying a .com domain now. It simply has to reach that point because there are only so many worthwhile keywords available in each niche. People are already buying .info and .biz names in increasing numbers, not to mention making up their own words just to get a short domain name.

              Those buying keyword.info domains today may well soon be seen as smarter and more forward thinking than those who buy domains diluted with add-on phrases just to get the keyword they want in a domain name with a .com extension.

              Stop and think . . . keyword.info or mybestkeywordtoday.com? When the gap in perception changes, and it is already changing, which domain is better when the domain extensions are perceived as equal? You know the answer.

              I do predict that in the not-too-distant future, a .info domain will be seen as equal to .com by the vast majority of people. The only differences that separate them will be the user experience and quality of the content.

              Those who are unable to adjust their thinking to changing realities have the most to lose. Dinosaurs have a way of losing relevance . . . or dying off. Of course, there will still be people telling you not to buy them so there are fewer people competing for them.

              Then someone will probably post a thread saying not to buy .biz domain names. I'm quietly buying .info and .biz names that have high-value, short, exact keywords. Some I may use soon, some I may simply sell later, at a nice profit. I could sit on them for 10 years and sell them off as retirement income. Believe me, in 10 years keyword.info will fetch a good price.
              Signature

              Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175308].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author bgmacaw
          Originally Posted by Steve Ranger View Post

          Can't you just summarise your point into a small paragraph?
          http://www.warriorforum.com/search.php

          This stupid topic gets discussed at least two or three times a week. It's a Groundhog Day topic.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171925].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
    But to explain the logic behind my opinion - I guess it would be because hotmail seems less professional. It isn't aimed at professionals and doesn't cater to professionals in features so therefore somebody who primarily uses this address...isn't...ya know...professional...?
    That is just silly. Plenty of professionals use hotmail since it's been around forever, unlike gmail.

    Gmail may offer a few more gadgets for the nerd-crowd but it's still a free email provider.

    I primarily use gmail because every reasonable nickname has already been taken on hotmail, but I find hotmail much easier to use when it comes to basic email. Many people prefer simplicity and don't care what all of the cool kids are using.
    Signature

    I'm all about that bass.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171513].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steve Ranger
    haha

    I give gmail much more respect as well.

    Watching screencasts they always seem to be logged in with there gmail accounts. Frank Kerns is superbadkern@gmail.com or something similar
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171524].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seobro
    OK for "roman coins" it was roman coin dot info in the position three on yahoo, position one on bing, and on google also position one. However, that is usually not the case. For most keywords it is a major brand ending in a dot com that rules the top rank of the search engines.

    I prefer to tell people check out "mywebsitename" than saying check out mywebsitename dot info because people will rare forget the name. However, they often will get confused and try in the dot com.

    Also, if a company already has the dot com and they are big, then you will add to their traffic if you advertise you domain name. Also, register "mizpellings" as these are common.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171627].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
    OK for "roman coins" it was roman coin dot info in the position three on yahoo, position one on bing, and on google also position one. However, that is usually not the case. For most keywords it is a major brand ending in a dot com that rules the top rank of the search engines.

    I prefer to tell people check out "mywebsitename" than saying check out mywebsitename dot info because people will rare forget the name. However, they often will get confused and try in the dot com.
    I agree with you, but that is a different discussion, why a .com is a better choice than a .info.

    As for why do .com's rule the rankings in most cases... they entered the IM game early, they have the money, most people still prefer to buy a .com's first. But that doesn't inherently mean that .com's are better or will rank better.
    Signature

    I'm all about that bass.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171683].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
    It would seem that several people here think I'm totally against
    .infos and am telling people not to use them. That's NOT true.

    The simple point of this thread was:

    (Let me make it simple for you)

    If you create a product, create the salespage, and let's say you claim
    that you make $10,000 monthly and you're going to teach people how to
    do it. You name the product: Super online cash machine.

    You check out the domains and see that they're all available You
    should use .com not .info. I really thought that was obvious but
    it would seem that it's not for some people.

    Why .com? Because you just claimed that you make $10,000 monthly
    for goodness sake. If you really make that kind of money then you
    won't have a problem buying & hosting a .com domain
    name to sell your product.


    End of story.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2171971].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

      Why .com? Because you just claimed that you make $10,000 monthly for goodness sake. If you really make that kind of money then you won't have a problem buying & hosting a .com domain
      name to sell your product.
      Nor would you have a problem buying and hosting a .info domain name to sell your product, because it's your forkin' product and you'll host it on whatever kind of domain name you damn well please.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172072].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author George Wright
      Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

      It would seem that several people here think I'm totally against
      .infos and am telling people not to use them. That's NOT true.

      The simple point of this thread was:

      (Let me make it simple for you)

      If you create a product, create the salespage, and let's say you claim
      that you make $10,000 monthly and you're going to teach people how to
      do it. You name the product: Super online cash machine.

      You check out the domains and see that they're all available You
      should use .com not .info. I really thought that was obvious but
      it would seem that it's not for some people.

      Why .com? Because you just claimed that you make $10,000 monthly
      for goodness sake. If you really make that kind of money then you
      won't have a problem buying & hosting a .com domain
      name to sell your product.


      End of story.
      Hi again,

      Methinks this position is a tad different from your OP. Not completely about face, but, different enough to say you have been swayed by some experienced marketers postings in this thread. Good for ya.

      George Wright
      Signature
      "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172149].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
        Originally Posted by George Wright View Post

        Hi again,

        Methinks this position is a tad different from your OP. Not completely about face, but, different enough to say you have been swayed by some experienced marketers postings in this thread. Good for ya.

        George Wright
        OP = .info sucks

        Revision = .info doesn't look as professional
        Signature

        I'm all about that bass.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172156].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
          Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

          Nor would you have a problem buying and hosting a .info domain name to sell your product, because it's your forkin' product and you'll host it on whatever kind of domain name you damn well please.
          Of course... Actually you should forget paid hosting & host it for
          free. That way you'll save more money.





          Originally Posted by George Wright View Post

          Hi again,

          Methinks this position is a tad different from your OP. Not completely about face, but, different enough to say you have been swayed by some experienced marketers postings in this thread. Good for ya.

          George Wright

          Originally Posted by jasonmorgan View Post

          OP = .info sucks

          Revision = .info doesn't look as professional


          LOL. swayed by some 'experienced marketers'? That's a good one.

          I said the same thing in the O.P., the revision just made it simpler
          for guys like you to understand, since you obviously couldn't.



          To those people selling an IM product for the first time:

          Want to sell an IM product on a .info domain? Then do it.
          You'll be the one losing money not me.

          .info domains may be good for some stuff like testing etc...
          but they're certianly not good for selling IM products. And quite
          frankly, anyone who says it doesn't make a difference doesn't
          have any common sense.

          Anyway, I'm done here. What we say now is fruitless. The point
          has already been made.

          Cheers,
          Johnny
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172245].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
            Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

            Of course... Actually you should forget paid hosting & host it for free. That way you'll save more money.
            You know, the big problem in this entire conversation has been that you CANNOT GET PAST THE IDEA that .com is $9 and .info is $1. You are so bound up in WHAT IT COSTS, you cant fathom the idea that someone might just like .info better and there is nothing wrong with that.

            When you come right down to it, if you're going to turn up your nose at my product because it's on a .info domain, I don't want you as a customer anyway. You'd probably ask for a refund because I didn't use the font you like.
            Signature
            "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172289].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
              Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

              You know, the big problem in this entire conversation has been that you CANNOT GET PAST THE IDEA that .com is $9 and .info is $1. You are so bound up in WHAT IT COSTS, you cant fathom the idea that someone might just like .info better and there is nothing wrong with that.
              No there's nothing wrong. But if that someone is selling a product
              that teaches people how to make money then he will lose sales.

              You see I like helping people, and I hate to see someone lose
              money just because of this little thing...


              Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

              When you come right down to it, if you're going to turn up your nose at my product because it's on a .info domain, I don't want you as a customer anyway. You'd probably ask for a refund because I didn't use the font you like.
              Don't worry dude, I wouldn't want to be your customer either.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172331].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author TimG
                Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                No there's nothing wrong. But if that someone is selling a product
                that teaches people how to make money then he will lose sales.

                You see I like helping people, and I hate to see someone lose
                money just because of this little thing...
                I respect your opinion but I do think it is flawed because regardless if someone uses a .info, .com or .org if they have a fantastic salespage and enough viral buzz the product will sell.

                I personally bought enough piece of crap products that were using a .com as their domain that if truly makes no difference to me what they use as long as the product delivers.

                Respetfully,
                Tim
                Signature
                Article Marketing Soldiers - The Best Selling Article Marketing Product On The Warrior Forum Is Now Looking For Affiliates! Make Over $25 Per Sale With This High Converting Product.

                Make More Money And Spend More Time With Your Family By Becoming A Scentsy Consultant - I Provide Personal Assistance And Help With Growing Your Business.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172366].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                You see I like helping people, and I hate to see someone lose money just because of this little thing...
                Let's not put too fine a point on it: "this little thing" is that you don't like the domain name.

                I don't see anything about the quality of the product, the reputation it's got in the industry, the credentials of the author, the nature of the pitch... it's all about whether you like the domain.

                Because you think anyone with a .info domain is cheap, and only got it to save $8.

                So hey; a .net domain is more expensive than a .com domain. Would I get extra credit if my website was at .net instead of .com?
                Signature
                "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172446].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
                  Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

                  I don't see anything about the quality of the product, the reputation it's got in the industry, the credentials of the author, the nature of the pitch...
                  You're right... but in the IM niche .info is regarded as a cheap
                  domain. A man who makes a living & teaches people how to
                  make a living online looks a bit odd selling his product on a .info
                  domain.

                  It may not look odd to you but it does to some people. And either
                  way, you're argument is pretty much irrelevant. What's the point?

                  I mean think about it, let's say that 90% of internet marketers don't
                  mind buying from a .info domain, and only 10% won't buy from it
                  (just because the product is being sold on a .info domain).

                  10% is little I know, but why lose them? Why not spend another
                  $8 to get a .com and get some of those 10% as well?

                  Now this is just an example. I'm pretty sure that there will be much
                  more than 10% IMers who will be turned off by a .info domain.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172496].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Rob Howard
                    [DELETED]
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172591].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
                      Originally Posted by ccmusicman View Post

                      Really?

                      You keep saying stuff like that but I have yet to see solid statistics to back it up.

                      Have you REALLY split tested to see if it does worse than a .com? Because if you haven't, you are guessing and really have no idea if a .com will sell better than a .info

                      Also, to take it a bit further, there are people who:

                      1. Hate video sales pages yet they are working.
                      2. Hate long form sales pages, yet they still sell.
                      3. Hate pop ups that say "Wait...Before you go..." and those seem to work.
                      4. Hate upsell's/downsells...yet we see them all the time and they are proven to work.

                      Take the upsells for example - I did it once with a WSO. I had 2 people email me and complain about it. But yet I increased my income by ~ 50% AND I had a few other people tell me they were GLAD I offered it to them.

                      So, according to the people that hated it, they figured I would just piss people off and lose trust. (That's what one guy told me). But yet I had another customer tell me they were GLAD I did it...the rest seemed not to care.

                      So, the fact is, YOU may not like a .info, but that means squat.

                      YOU don't matter in the long term of things. I don't matter in the long term of things.

                      What matters is CONVERSIONS on a whole. Does a .com convert better than a .info.

                      Until you can quote some hard facts that says a .com does convert better (I mean real stats from a split test with all things being equal), what you say is nothing but pure guesswork, opinion and in a business, I would rather have hard facts.

                      Rob

                      Why test it when you already know the answer? That would be
                      a waste of time.

                      I know that .coms works better in the IM niche because I'm
                      experienced enough to know.

                      Actually you don't really need to be experienced to know it. If you know
                      anything at all about the IM audience than you would
                      know that .coms would work better than a .info in this niche.

                      To make it easier for you, in the IM niche, .com is clean, .info is
                      "tainted". I didn't make it that way, other people did.

                      How the heck could you possibly think that the .com will be bested
                      by .info, in the IM niche???

                      That's absurd...
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172634].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Rob Howard
                        [DELETED]
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172663].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
                          Originally Posted by ccmusicman View Post

                          Wow.

                          Just wow...

                          That HAS to be someone's famous last words...

                          You make WAY too many assumptions.

                          Split testing is one of the fundamentals of business.

                          And waste of time?

                          Register a .info of the same name as a .com - less than 5 minutes.

                          Copying the exact site from your .com to a .info - less than 5 minutes.

                          Plugging your .info into a split testing software like Affiliate Prophet - less than 5 minutes.

                          Letting the test run until you establish solid numbers - hands off and no extra time needed.

                          So, I count about 15 minutes or less to set it up.


                          In the end, though, you assume erroneously, that you are your market. Just because you are IN the market doesn't mean squat.

                          Frank Kern released a free product that led to continuity last year. I believe it was Mass Control monthly or something.

                          He ended up getting a HUGE amount of canceled subscribers and he didn't know why.

                          He surveyed and found that he gave too much info up front and people felt overwhelmed.

                          He thought, erroneously, that since he liked a lot of stuff up front, so should his market because he is "in" the market.

                          That simple error of mindset cost him thousands and thousands of dollars.

                          The problem here isn't the .info or the .com...it's your presumed assumptions that, someday, may cost you thousands too.

                          Don't make that mistake.

                          Rob

                          (BTW - I have sold on a .info before...inside the IM market...and have seen no difference is sales conversions between my .com and .info - But that was without a good split test. I need to do that.)


                          Nice long post but what you said does not matter.

                          Even if there were just 1000 people in the whole IM audience
                          that wouldn't buy an IM product from a .info domains, it would
                          still be worth it to use a .com.

                          No one will be turned off by a .com domain, but some people
                          will be turned off by a .info domain...

                          You really think that I'm the only one that get turned off by
                          a .info domain? If you think so that you know nothing about
                          this market, sorry.

                          I can't believe how much hassle this thread has created
                          over something so obvious...
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172694].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author George Wright
                            Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post


                            I can't believe how much hassle this thread has created
                            over something so obvious...
                            Awe IM Headlines, We're just having a little fun, because you are totally wrong because you start out from the false premise that it makes a difference. It's a known fact that absolutes are not good. Can you say never say never? Always is just as bad.

                            For Instance I could argue that for your 1,000 that wouldn't buy from a .info name there are 2,000 that would buy out of admiration for someone so bold as to use a .info or because they felt sorry for the poor newbie who couldn't afford a .com, or because their puppy, named Info just died and they felt all warm and fuzzy to buy from .info. On and on we go and neither of us has a thimble full of proof to back us up.

                            This really has been fun.

                            Thank you,

                            George Wright
                            Signature
                            "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172727].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                          Why test it when you already know the answer? That would be a waste of time.

                          I know that .coms works better in the IM niche because I'm experienced enough to know.
                          The most absurd, and common, assumption you'll see most months. Lemme illustrate...

                          I was at a seminar years ago, and between sessions two guys came out and said they wanted to test something. They had 8 headlines they were considering for a product. One liked one headline and the other a different one.

                          The product was to be marketed to the same group we were part of. They figured it would be better to survey the group, rather than debate over which one was right. They read us all 8 headlines, and asked us to vote. 2/3 of the room liked one headline better than any of the others. That's a big-time winner. The kind of difference that can turn a losing offer into a huge money-maker.

                          It was also NOT either of the ones these guys liked.

                          The two guys? One was Drew Kaplan. For those who don't know him, Drew was the guy behind DAK, an early leader in consumer electronics, and one of the most successful copywriters in history. The other guy was Jay Abraham.

                          They were both staring at a killer headline and missed it. But they didn't, really, because they were smart enough to know that your market always knows better than you what they want. And, if you ask, they'll tell you.

                          90% of what you think you know, ain't so.


                          Paul
                          Signature
                          .
                          Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172725].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                            Rob,
                            I never assume I know what the market wants. I make educated guesses, then I test. I've found myself to be wrong 50 to 80% of the time.
                            Rule of thumb for split testing: 50% of your tests will result in no noticeable change. 25% will bring significant reductions. 25% will improve things significantly. This model assumes that you know what to test, and have the experience to choose wisely.

                            If you're silly enough to assume you're smarter than your market about what they want, those numbers will tilt away from significant improvements in a big way.


                            Paul
                            Signature
                            .
                            Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172737].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author Rob Howard
                              [DELETED]
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172747].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                Rob,
                                Funnily enough, I have never considered a .com vs. a .info. That's on my "to test" list.
                                That would be interesting. I'd be curious to see if the fact that the product type (info) matches the domain type (.info) actually helps sales or not.

                                For me, it wouldn't make any difference in the IM niche. Outside, it might be a plus factor, because of the congruency. But that's just a personal observation, and I'm a word geek. I have preferences that might not match the market(s).


                                Paul
                                Signature
                                .
                                Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172774].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                                Originally Posted by ccmusicman View Post

                                Funnily enough, I have never considered a .com vs. a .info. That's on my "to test" list.
                                You know, I actually bought one domain for an upcoming product during GoDaddy's "Free .info with .com" promotion and forgot to kick the .info out of the cart. (I remembered on the other three domains I bought during that promotion... not that they made it easy; you have to kick it out twice.) So I may be testing that myself... along with a PPC foray, I think, so I can drive some traffic to each of them.
                                Signature
                                "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172793].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
                                  Originally Posted by ccmusicman View Post

                                  Funnily enough, I have never considered a .com vs. a .info. That's on my "to test" list.

                                  Rob
                                  That's the spirit. It would be great if you discover that you can
                                  make more sales selling an IM product on a .info domain.

                                  Then again if .info worked better than .coms for IM products, I'm
                                  pretty sure that the gurus and several other big product sellers
                                  would sell their IM products on .info domains not on .coms. I've
                                  never seen a guru release one of his big products on a .info,
                                  have you? :rolleyes:

                                  Is it possible that is has never been tested before? I doubt it.

                                  Oh & BTW, I didn't mention this before because I forgot:

                                  .coms are easier for people to remember, so even if
                                  there would be no difference in the conversion rate, .coms
                                  will still be worth it since when people remember a websites
                                  name, normally they will type it in with a .com in the end.


                                  You see mate?

                                  Anyway, good luck with your test bro.

                                  See you around.
                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172882].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Daniel Scott
                        Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                        Why test it when you already know the answer? That would be
                        a waste of time.

                        I know that .coms works better in the IM niche because I'm
                        experienced enough to know.

                        Actually you don't really need to be experienced to know it. If you know
                        anything at all about the IM audience than you would
                        know that .coms would work better than a .info in this niche.

                        To make it easier for you, in the IM niche, .com is clean, .info is
                        "tainted". I didn't make it that way, other people did.

                        How the heck could you possibly think that the .com will be bested
                        by .info, in the IM niche???

                        That's absurd...
                        Got proof?

                        For the record, I almost always go with .com.

                        But that doesn't mean it's definitely better...

                        You're throwing up assumptions and guesses as fact. That's dangerous.

                        And it shows - in no uncertain terms -exactly how little you know about this business.

                        If you want to present information as fact, you need to back it up...

                        ...not just insult everyone who doesn't agree with your BS theory.

                        MY theory is that it makes an almost imperceptible difference regardless of what your domain name ends in.

                        But at least I have the intelligence to know it's just a theory.

                        -Dan
                        Signature

                        Always looking for badass direct-response copywriters. PM me if we don't know each other and you're looking for work.

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172672].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                    in the IM niche .info is regarded as a cheap domain.
                    And I think people in the IM niche are smarter than that, and will evaluate the product on its merits.

                    But please, provide me your arguments for why the IM niche is full of shallow, stupid, shortsighted people.
                    Signature
                    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172627].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
                      Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

                      And I think people in the IM niche are smarter than that, and will evaluate the product on its merits.

                      But please, provide me your arguments for why the IM niche is full of shallow, stupid, shortsighted people.
                      I don't know, I never said the IM niche is full of stupid shortsighted
                      people. You invented that.

                      You keep quoting pieces of my posts to start a new
                      argument. You're not here to learn or to help people...

                      You're entertaining me though...

                      Keep it up!
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172662].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                        Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                        I don't know, I never said the IM niche is full of stupid shortsighted people. You invented that.
                        No, I inferred it. You said that people would not buy a product because it was on a .info domain.

                        Now, if that product is of high quality and serves their purposes at a fair price, this is a stupid and shortsighted decision.

                        But you claim they'll make that decision over a domain name.

                        You keep quoting pieces of my posts to start a new argument.
                        No, it's the same argument: the domain name is irrelevant. It forms no part of the average person's buying decision, IM niche or otherwise. You could put your product on "bighairyscam.biz" and people would buy it anyway if they wanted it.
                        Signature
                        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172777].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author George Wright
                    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                    You're right... but in the IM niche .info is regarded as a cheap
                    domain.
                    In the IM niche, HostGator is regarded as a cheap host, Name Cheap is regarded as, ummm.... Name Cheap (get it ), Freebies are regarded as less than Cheap, WSOs are cheaper than the regular price. And yet those who teach sometimes say to use all of the above. Are they too wrong? Just askin.

                    George Wright
                    Signature
                    "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172669].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author theverysmartguy
                    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                    You're right... but in the IM niche .info is regarded as a cheap
                    domain. A man who makes a living & teaches people how to
                    make a living online looks a bit odd selling his product on a .info
                    domain.

                    It may not look odd to you but it does to some people. And either
                    way, you're argument is pretty much irrelevant. What's the point?

                    I mean think about it, let's say that 90% of internet marketers don't
                    mind buying from a .info domain, and only 10% won't buy from it
                    (just because the product is being sold on a .info domain).

                    10% is little I know, but why lose them? Why not spend another
                    $8 to get a .com and get some of those 10% as well?

                    Now this is just an example. I'm pretty sure that there will be much
                    more than 10% IMers who will be turned off by a .info domain.
                    So basically what you are saying is if you are in the IM business and are selling an IM related product, NOT to use a .info. And your reasoning that if should be able to afford the extra $8 for it because you saying you make so much money, and are going to teach people to do the same.

                    For starters, do you know how the rich get rich? They watch what they spend, and basically penny pinch. But honestly that is besides the point here.

                    Just because someone is teaching people to make money online does not mean they have to use the .com TLD. If you are squawking about pricing, then why not use a .ws TLD which is around the $16 mark on go daddy. Will that display anything different to the visitor? Will it shout out " My, he spend $16 on a domain name for this site, he must know what he is doing alright." ? Probably not.

                    I rarely look at the TLD of a domain to see if its a .info, .com, . org or whatever. If it has good info that I like, and is useful to me, I bookmark it so that I can come back to it later.

                    BTW, using a .info domain and making money with it will also tell his visitors that it doesn't really matter all that much what your TLD is to make money online.

                    And one more thing, you mentioned the IM industry, so you single it out as an industry to NOT use the .info in. Why?
                    What about other types of niches? If the .info domain looks so unprofessional why would you ONLY suggest it to the IM industry? Does that mean that you think it is ok for other types of industry sites to look unprofessional instead, because it is perfectly fine to use .info domains with them, just not the IM industry?

                    BTW, its all rubbish anyways. Google doesn't care if its a .com or a .info domain in the first place. It does not immediately say that oh, its a .info lets not rank it, and we might as well sandbox it altogether. That doesn't happen.

                    So honestly when it comes right down to it, it is YOUR OWN personal opinion about the matter. It is not a fully documented find on the subject. Which means you are teaching people to try and hate .info because it is unprofessional, and cheap. Which means that you are teaching people the wrong things.

                    I for one use several .info domains. At first they were just for testing, but after they were ranking, and getting traffic, I figured I would just keep them the way they are instead of using them to redirect to a .com in the future.

                    And FYI, it takes the same amount of time to index and rank a .info domain than it does to index, and rank a .com

                    If the information on any kind of website is good, and useful, then who cares what extension it has, be it a .info, .com, .org, .net etc etc.

                    Anyways, that is about it for me on this subject.

                    -- Jeff
                    Signature

                    "Doing nothing is worse than doing it wrong."

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172734].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JustKid
    Sorry can I see some numbers to back it up? I frequently use .info because as a mass site builder/ auto blogger I want to save as much money as I can. Who says .com is more valuable for conversions is there any math to back up your statement or are you going by the fact that since .com is $9 and .info is $1 that .info tld information or product is worth less.

    Im just saying its not like having a .com instantly verifies you as a guru just because you were able to skip lunch or dinner.

    I never said that you guys shouldn't use .info
    domains. I said that you shouldn't sell an IM product on
    a .info.

    Also, I started this thread to help people, not to start a
    debate. By selling an IM product on a .info you'll lose sales
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172039].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jaynejones2010
      Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Don't like . info then stay away from them simple. Building sites and making cash should be the focus here.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172099].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author maidmarion
    More experienced users use a .info domain when they can't get the .com, .net and .org.
    Apparantly it is not really worth it though as it doesn't rate with google very well!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172172].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
      Originally Posted by maidmarion View Post

      More experienced users use a .info domain when they can't get the .com, .net and .org.
      Apparantly it is not really worth it though as it doesn't rate with google very well!

      that's bull****, plain and simple

      I really would like to know where people get their info...:rolleyes:

      you can rank really really well on any tld providing the content you provide is quality, and you take the proper steps to get ranked: building backlinks, fresh content, SEO, etc...
      Signature
      ---------------
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176326].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author US Blues
    I occasionally buy .info and .us domains for sites that I do not intend to work on that much. They are perfect for simple gateways or for payment pages. I also use them as sample pages for some of my offline work and I have had no complaints. Of course I also show them my main site which is a .com.

    I have also used .info domains for offline CPA ads with great success. Sometimes it becomes hard to find a relevant yet memorable .com for a particular offer so .info's can work very well there.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172179].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ladyspinner
    He may not be a millionaire, but he certainly started a buzz.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172229].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
      Originally Posted by ladyspinner View Post

      He may not be a millionaire, but he certainly started a buzz.
      does that make him a buzzillionaire?
      Signature

      I'm all about that bass.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172246].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Samuel Baker
    Its up to the person ultimately!
    Let them be, If it makes them money or not their decision.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172235].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Justinfm
    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post


    The first thing that comes to my mind when I see something
    like this is:

    "So this guy is rich and he can't even afford a $9 domain?"


    .info domains look highly unprofessional.
    If this looks unprofessional or not kind of depends on the target audience. You have a pretty large segment that doesn't really know the difference with the TLD's and wouldn't blink an eye.

    I used to feel the same way about PayPal. Anyone can get a PayPal account so, how professional is that, but now it's the standard processor again.

    I would love to see a study on this and see what percentage of people think a .info domain is unprofessional. I would be surprised if the number was too high, although certainly it would be higher in the IM market where people tend to be a bit more sensitive to these things.
    Signature

    2 hours + $50 = 1 full 40 hour work week - http://www.MultiProfitability.com
    How does that work? With Cloning of course. Watch the free videos at the url above.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172396].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
    It's possible the the .com version was taken when the person bought his .info site, and has expired since then. At any rate, the search engines don't care what the domain extension is, plenty of .info sites rank on the first page of SERPs.

    Now, I would agree with the OP that this person is probably lying about his millionaire status, but I'd doubt him if his site was a .com as well. Not many millionaires really go around talking about being a millionaire, that's more the foolishness of wannabes.

    Nevertheless, a lot of assumptions are being made, but let's not forget that quite often, our perception and assumptions do not match someone else's reality.
    Signature

    Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172437].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DrewClement
    Aside from the .info/.com debate...one of your main points is that you think he is being cheap by saving $8 on his domain.

    Can I just point something out here?

    People who are worth millions of dollars, and earn enough money to live comfortably do so by being smart with their money. Those with comfortable retirement funds, wise investment plans, and wealth often get to that point by being "cheap".

    Those that have the ability to save money here and there are the ones that earn more in the long run...and save more.

    And as someone else pointed out earlier....maybe he bought 100 domains at once=$800 in savings that he could use towards building sites and traffic.

    Every millionaire comes from somewhere.....and while some feel more than comfortable throwing away $8 on a latte, an e-book, or whatever...$8 can be the starting point if you know what you are doing and are dedicated.

    My grandfather began with $20 in his pocket, and is now as successful as I could ever hope to be.
    Signature


    50% Commission, Proven Products, and MASSIVE Profits

    Drew@SellHealth.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172692].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrick Mader
    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

    I keep seeing this again & again. Today I was browsing
    on twitter and stumbled upon a profile of a person
    that claimed he's a millionaire from internet
    marketing.

    I check out his website (which sells an IM product)
    and it's a .info domain.

    Are you serious? I truly don't know if I should cry or laugh
    at something like this.

    If you really are rich then you won't bother with a .info domain,
    unless you own the .com domain and want to buy all the tlds.

    Don't use .info domains if you're going to set up a website
    that teaches people how to make money. It's a total turn
    off.

    The first thing that comes to my mind when I see something
    like this is:

    "So this guy is rich and he can't even afford a $9 domain?"


    .info domains look highly unprofessional.

    Use .coms, they're the best domains, and if you think that it's
    not worth it to invest $9 for your success, then forget setting up
    a business, and go get a 9-5.

    Cheers,
    Johnny

    I used .info for my optin sites... but if i dont have 9$ for a com domain i absolutly can´t me a millionaire...

    pat
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172706].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bwh1
    First, I have to agree with the OP about the fact that a .com looks more professional if you promote your own product.

    There are always a ton of opportunities to find a great .com, so the only reason NOT to take a .com for a product launch is lack of money or confidence that someone will buy the product (how's that for a Pro marketer?!).

    But if you are a affiliate, a .info does make sense in many ways, to match keywords. I have a few of them.

    So actually it's a matter of your goal with that domain.

    On a SEO side there was a test study by one of my Wealthy Affiliate pals, PotPieGirl.

    She got for the same keyword a .com .org .net a .com with hyphens and a .info domain.

    She let that test running with the keyword in the domain only, no keywords in the content and no on page optimization.

    The conclusion after several weeks was that the .com ranked best, the .org was second behind the .com with hyphen and the .net, last was the .info which took by the way a long time to appear in the search results, even indexed and showing up if searched with the url.

    So to build a business, always a .com if you can (afford it).

    It's not 5th avenue, only $9 bucks

    G.
    Signature

    Affiliates Wanted! Make anywhere from 42,- to $72 in commissions. Simply Recommend the Best QuickBooks Pro Video Course available at Clickbank.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172846].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
      Originally Posted by bwh1 View Post

      On a SEO side there was a test study by one of my Wealthy Affiliate pals, PotPieGirl.

      She got for the same keyword a .com .org .net a .com with hyphens and a .info domain.

      She let that test running with the keyword in the domain only, no keywords in the content and no on page optimization.

      The conclusion after several weeks was that the .com ranked best, the .org was second behind the .com with hyphen and the .net, last was the .info which took by the way a long time to appear in the search results, even indexed and showing up if searched with the url.
      That may only be the result of the .com being the first site of the bunch that Google found if it was the exact same content on them. If it wasn't the exact same content then the test proves nothing. The content could be the difference.

      Did they also have the exact same number of links from the exact same locations with the exact same anchor text?

      Really, there are hundreds of ranking factors, more are unknown than known, so how can any conclusive result be drawn with from such a limited amount of known data?
      Signature

      Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172855].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill View Post

        Really, there are hundreds of ranking factors, more are unknown than known, so how can any conclusive result be drawn with from such a limited amount of known data?
        I have a much simpler test in mind.

        If I run PPC ads for the .com and the .info, and drive 1,000 people to each site...

        Which one sells more?

        I don't give a damn which one ranks where or how many backlinks or anything like that. I want to know, given a PPC ad, how many impressions do I need to get 1,000 clicks - and how many sales do I make off those clicks?

        Sales from other sources don't count.

        That's a small enough target that I think it can be measured. Once the product's ready, I think I'll do just that.
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172884].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
          Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

          I have a much simpler test in mind.

          If I run PPC ads for the .com and the .info, and drive 1,000 people to each site...

          Which one sells more?

          I don't give a damn which one ranks where or how many backlinks or anything like that. I want to know, given a PPC ad, how many impressions do I need to get 1,000 clicks - and how many sales do I make off those clicks?

          Sales from other sources don't count.

          That's a small enough target that I think it can be measured. Once the product's ready, I think I'll do just that.
          That's a much better test than the one I responded to. You can actually measure the results based on known factors you control rather than mostly unknown factors you don't control. Let us know the results.
          Signature

          Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172890].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Cezar R Abadiano
    If you haven't tested it to definitively know if .com is really better than .info then how can you say that it is indeed better in terms of sales.

    My understanding of IM is what you know gets thrown out the window by what your customers want.

    I always believed that it's your product along with your sales page and all the other things that come together to entice your customers into buying from you.

    You have to give your customers credit for knowing if what you're selling is crap of not regardless of whether or not your domain ends in .com or .info.

    Reminds of the tire swing project analogy.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172848].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author George Wright
    Some one correct me if I'm not wright. However, the issue here is, at least from the OP, If a IMer gets to the .info page will he leave and not buy just because it is a .info.

    If you think in terms of SEO, there is a lot more to be considered.

    In the OPs scenario, some how, some way the IMer got to the page and then leaves just because it's a "cheap" .info.

    To that I say, no proof. To the SEO thing (which isn't the issue here) I bow to the SEO experts.

    George Wright
    Signature
    "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2172878].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author troy23
    It makes no difference at all. I sell products on both.

    And when I buy something I don't look at the domain name....who cares what the domain extension is if the product serves your needs.

    .coms are worth using if you are a business and people are likely to type in your URL, but for selling ebooks or IM information which is not taken seriously by Google, then it really makes no difference.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173267].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DrGUID
    My best Adsense page is on a .info. That TLD is perfect for information/directory sites!
    Signature

    Love passive income? Make money on hubpages. Make money from ClickBank. Preserve your new wealth by investing in gold.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173293].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Preben Frenning
    Only reasons to get .info in my opinion, is for niche affiliate marketing with ppc,(To get a higher quality score, and a more trustworthy url) and keyword rich domains for SEO in competitive niches.

    Also, it would actually make sense to sell an /SEOtraffic product that ranks very high in google for competitive keywords on a .info domain.

    "Dominate the first page of google for ANY website" - On a .info domain.
    Signature

    Content overload? Too many tabs open? Then
    check out my awesome tech startup! - It will make your life easier.


    Twitter? - http://twitter.com/Preben_Frenning

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173298].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      .coms are easier for people to remember, so even if there would be no difference in the conversion rate, .coms will still be worth it since when people remember a websites name, normally they will type it in with a .com in the end.
      This is the only argument you've made that holds any water, and it only matters for people who need to remember the domain name. There are an awful lot of circumstances in which that's not a consideration.

      It's also questionable how long that will remain true, since .info makes more sense to the mind than .com. Not to mention that people are becoming more aware of extensions and the like as they get familiar with the net.

      That aside, it's interesting to watch someone carry confirmation bias this far. You do realize, I hope, that this particular point, while it has some limited truth, is completely irrelevant to your initial argument?


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173522].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
    Al,
    However a professional approach would be a .com domain.
    Common and significant error. You are conflating conventional with professional. Please define your intended meaning for the word "professional," in this context.

    Many people feel that a first name as a username is unprofessional. Yet, I've used paul[-at-]talkbiz.com as my primary email address for over a decade, without any challenges. I would NOT, however, use pleasejust[-at-]duckoffandfly.com as a business address, as that would, to me, be inappropriate in my business. (Why yes, I do own that domain.)


    Paul
    Signature
    .
    Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173584].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Preben Frenning
      Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

      Al,Common and significant error. You are conflating conventional with professional. Please define your intended meaning for the word "professional," in this context.

      Many people feel that a first name as a username is unprofessional. Yet, I've used paul[-at-]talkbiz.com as my primary email address for over a decade, without any challenges. I would NOT, however, use pleasejust[-at-]duckoffandfly.com as a business address, as that would, to me, be inappropriate in my business. (Why yes, I do own that domain.)


      Paul
      Agreed. Having a .com address for a ppc landing page only is just plain dumb, if that's the only intention for it. (Unless it's for a big company)

      As for email, having first name @.. is considered to be very professional, unless it's the email for orders/sales/support etc.
      It's extremely common to have first name first for small-medium companies. For the bigger ones, it makes sense to include last name as well.

      But the last point is the most important one really. "In my business".
      People can say whatever they want, but you most likely know your customers best. Especially if you're a marketer.

      - Preben
      Signature

      Content overload? Too many tabs open? Then
      check out my awesome tech startup! - It will make your life easier.


      Twitter? - http://twitter.com/Preben_Frenning

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173610].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author candoit2
    Is it just me or does it seem that the average person who is so skeptical that they assume a .info is an automatic scam is quite possibly a high refund risk had you used a .com and they had purchased?

    Aaron
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173627].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      Preben,
      As for email, having first name @.. is considered to be very professional, unless it's the email for orders/sales/support etc.
      There are a great many people who disagree with you on this. (I'm clearly not one of them.) They want to see first and last name, first initial and last name, or some title in the userpart.

      They're not in any kind of majority, but there are a lot of them out there. As in, millions. It's not how they're used to seeing things done, so they consider it unprofessional. These are often the same people who consider any small business to be unprofessional, and who consider certain objects to be useful symbols of "status."


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173652].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Preben Frenning
        Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

        Preben,There are a great many people who disagree with you on this. (I'm clearly not one of them.) They want to see first and last name, first initial and last name, or some title in the userpart.

        They're not in any kind of majority, but there are a lot of them out there. As in, millions. It's not how they're used to seeing things done, so they consider it unprofessional. These are often the same people who consider any small business to be unprofessional, and who consider certain objects to be useful symbols of "status."


        Paul
        That's why everyone should consider what their customers think, rather than themselves. If you know your customers lose credibility in you if you have your first name, the of course you don't do that.

        Also, it's obviously a cultural "thing". Here in Norway, I call and email businesses every day, ranging from $2m revenue to $100m revenue, and it varies a lot. Most of them have their first name, but the bigger ones usually have the last name as well. It makes sense to include the last name when there might be more people with the same name in the company.

        I can agree that the same companies would also consider small companies as unprofessional.

        Still, I use my first name, my clients find that professional enough, and it makes it easy for me, and easy for them to remember my email

        Anyways, it looks like we agree, let's not hijack this thread with "First only or first+last name in business email?" :p

        - Preben
        Signature

        Content overload? Too many tabs open? Then
        check out my awesome tech startup! - It will make your life easier.


        Twitter? - http://twitter.com/Preben_Frenning

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173717].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
          Preben,
          That's why everyone should consider what their customers think, rather than themselves. If you know your customers lose credibility in you if you have your first name, the of course you don't do that.
          What if only some of them think a certain way?

          For instance, back when I wrote copy for clients, I had a rule: If I couldn't make someone laugh - twice - within the first half hour on the phone, I didn't work with them. Some folks found my approach unprofessional, but that just saved us both a lot of wasted time and effort.

          It's a filter.

          My newsletter site is the antithesis of what most people expect in a subscription page. It's plain text, 2200+ words of it. That runs some people off, both due to the casual formatting and the wordiness of the intro. But, if that bothers them, they're not going to read the issues, which are usually longer than that. So, it saves them time.

          I use a different set of techniques to get the desired result, and they seem decidedly unprofessional to many people. But they work for me. Very well, in fact.

          We're in agreement here, except for one word being missing from your quoted comment: It should read "desired customers."

          Too many people want every customer possible, and end up losing a lot because they don't define who they personally want to work with.


          Paul
          Signature
          .
          Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173758].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Preben Frenning
            Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

            Preben,What if only some of them think a certain way?

            For instance, back when I wrote copy for clients, I had a rule: If I couldn't make someone laugh - twice - within the first half hour on the phone, I didn't work with them. Some folks found my approach unprofessional, but that just saved us both a lot of wasted time and effort.

            It's a filter.

            My newsletter site is the antithesis of what most people expect in a subscription page. It's plain text, 2200+ words of it. That runs some people off, both due to the casual formatting and the wordiness of the intro. But, if that bothers them, they're not going to read the issues, which are usually longer than that. So, it saves them time.

            I use a different set of techniques to get the desired result, and they seem decidedly unprofessional to many people. But they work for me. Very well, in fact.

            We're in agreement here, except for one word being missing from your quoted comment: It should read "desired customers."

            Too many people want every customer possible, and end up losing a lot because they don't define who they personally want to work with.


            Paul
            Very true, and a good point. It's a better long-term strategy you have there, and everything makes sense. And I must admit it was a really good rule you have for yourself there, with the "phone trick".

            I obviously have a lot to learn, which is why I'm going to study marketing in the Fall With a specialization in Strategic Expansion, and a "self focus" on guerilla marketing, viral marketing and perceived value.

            Anyways, we totally agree now

            - Preben
            Signature

            Content overload? Too many tabs open? Then
            check out my awesome tech startup! - It will make your life easier.


            Twitter? - http://twitter.com/Preben_Frenning

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173819].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
            Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

            If I couldn't make someone laugh - twice - within the first half hour on the phone, I didn't work with them.
            I like this rule. I may steal it.

            I also note the phrase "on the phone" in there

            Too many people want every customer possible, and end up losing a lot because they don't define who they personally want to work with.
            I like to point to Laura Cutler, who said in an interview with Inc. magazine:

            "Remember, we're not talking about mass products and mass markets anymore. You're looking for 10%, and you're looking for intensity. It's not good enough any longer that 80% think it's nice. Nice is nowhere. You need 10% who love it."

            Also in that interview, there's a bit at the bottom of page 3 on doing market research that works. There's this pattern in Laura's methodology, if you really look at it, where (if I may refer obliquely to another thread) the key to continued success is to keep one foot firmly in the ivory tower and one foot well out of it. You can't ignore the techniques and tactics of big business, but you have to apply them the same way small business does.

            And I'm really starting to see this huge gap in the world where nobody knows how to run a medium business, it's either a "mom and pop" kind of operation or it's a big corporation. Joel Spolsky calls them the "Ben and Jerry's" and "Amazon" models, and the problem is that the overwhelming majority of businesses are neither.

            We always talk about the companies that have 1% market share and up, but lurking in the corner of that pie chart is this tiny little sliver that says "other" - and there are thousands of companies in there, companies with 0.00001% market share, who are not failures by any stretch of the imagination. And while the popular misconception is that they're little mom and pop operations, there are multi-million dollar companies in that sliver.
            Signature
            "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175222].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Tom B
            Banned
            Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post


            If I couldn't make someone laugh - twice - within the first half hour on the phone, I didn't work with them.

            Paul
            Seeing some of your jokes I could assume you don't work with a lot of people.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175248].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Andyhenry
    I'm glad to see some common sense filtering in to this thread.

    There's so much BS being said here that just doesn't hold up.

    If YOU think differently of a person or product because of the tld - fine. You're entitled to your opinion, but stating such stuff as fact just makes you look stupid.

    Several people have listed 'reasons for choosing a .info' as though their logic is universal and comprehensive - it's BS.

    I have at least 50 .info domains.

    I HAVE tested whether selling from them compared to .com's makes a difference and for it makes ZERO difference.

    Paul and Caliban have already stated why - almost everything depends on where the traffic came from.

    Since I've been in IM for over a decade the people I market to generally know me and I could throw up a Paypal button onto a free blog hosted by an obscure local hosting company and it would make practically no difference to my conversion rate.

    I happily buy stuff all the time from sites with zero regard to their domain extension, when I see .info I think........ NOTHING. I don't give a crap.

    Sure, when I'm entering a new niche or launching a new site I tend to go for the .com - just because I've found that if people can't remember the domain extension, that's the one they'll try first.

    BUT most of my traffic comes from people following links - so their ability to remember my domain extension is not a factor.

    To come here a mock people for using .info's is just stupid - sorry.

    Putting all this emphasis on the extension and then making out that there are only negative reasons for buying them to justify your position doesn't make sense.

    You have no idea why some people buy .info extensions (obviously)

    I had over 1000 .info domains at one point and it was nothing to do with whether the .com was available or the price of the domain, or anything to do with confidence of the product - actually they were all information sites so it just made sense and certainly never had any adverse affect as far as indexing, serps or sales goes.

    If you don't like the way someone else does their business - why not just get on with your own instead of creating a negative thread and pushing out misinformation just to stroke your ego.
    Signature

    nothing to see here.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173653].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      Andy,
      If you don't like the way someone else does their business - why not just get on with your own instead of creating a negative thread and pushing out misinformation just to stroke your ego.
      Something annoyed her/him, and that required a response.

      The rest is just details.


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2173676].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author H.Miller
    Alot of people use .infos and they are very successful. I honestly don't think people care if its .info .tv or .blahblah as long as it provides them with valuable information.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2174692].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author revenue27
    Interesting thread, I do have .info domain, I use it to sell stuff from amazon, and it still there are people that buy through my website. IMO it depends on the buyers need, if they are really needing the products they will buy it anyway, no matter where they land it on.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2174845].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DogScout
    You can make up for not having an exact match for a keyword phrase URL. It is now such a small piece of the puzzle as to be virtually a non-consideration. (In my world).

    Most off-line marketing will have the client type in a .com by habit. If they forget the extension... they will probably give up before they find the .info

    There are appropriate uses for it, as someone said, tracking and other strickly online uses, but unless you just totally ignore all off-line markets, using anything but a .com will cost you money, in my opinion. Much more than the extra $5.50 it takes to get a .com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2174965].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    Originally Posted by precious007 View Post

    I wouldn't call him a scammer right of the bat,

    The are .info domains that are making a fortune,
    look them up in google..

    It's not always the extension that matters.

    However a professional approach would be
    a .com domain.

    Al.
    I agree, but *.info could sometimes make a lot of sense.
    Nothing wrong with "internetmarketing.info" <-- example

    Do you think that the common joe off the street knows about that "...info is less worth than .com?" 99% of people "out there" don't know anything about such things.

    A site like migraine.info or whatever i could come up with now...would make a lot of sense, IMO.
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175359].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author susinggih
    If you expect most of your traffic are coming from search engine and you have limited budget to compete in terms of backlinks with your competitors then yes I agree that .info is a bad choice. You want to start your site with .com. Or at least .net or .org.

    But if you don't expect to get traffic from search engine than why would you want to have .com? No use at all.

    Personally, (SEO factors excluded) I love domain with .net. It sound the coolest
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175893].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Janice Sperry
    I agree with most that a .info in many cases does not make a difference.

    However, I agree with the OP that .com is the best way to go for IM and other eBiz related sites.

    I have never done split testing but I know how I respond as a "customer" or "searcher". When I see .info it is automatically a red flag for several reasons. I may or may not do more investigating. Too be honest in most cases I just leave the site or never visit it in the first place. Right or wrong I automatically think this person does not know what they are doing, they do not care enough to buy a .com, or they are just preying on unsuspecting newbies. They could be just trying to clone another site and I would rather go to the original which is usually a .com. I want to do my eBiz business with experienced professionals that are serious about their website. Just having a .com does not in itself prove anything but it is one less red flag when I am reviewing the site.

    My thinking could be faulty but I know for a fact that .info's, .net's, etc have lost MY business on occasion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175917].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
      Good post JMS.


      Originally Posted by JMS View Post

      I agree with most that a .info in many cases does not make a difference.

      However, I agree with the OP that .com is the best way to go for IM and other eBiz related sites.

      I have never done split testing but I know how I respond as a "customer" or "searcher". When I see .info it is automatically a red flag for several reasons. I may or may not do more investigating. Too be honest in most cases I just leave the site or never visit it in the first place. Right or wrong I automatically think this person does not know what they are doing, they do not care enough to buy a .com, or they are just preying on unsuspecting newbies. They could be just trying to clone another site and I would rather go to the original which is usually a .com. I want to do my eBiz business with experienced professionals that are serious about their website. Just having a .com does not in itself prove anything but it is one less red flag when I am reviewing the site.

      My thinking could be faulty but I know for a fact that .info's, .net's, etc have lost MY business on occasion.

      Just one thing...


      Originally Posted by JMS View Post

      My thinking could be faulty
      No it's perfectly normal. And there are lots, and I mean lots of people
      like you and me.

      But apparently a lot of folks here find it hard to believe that... and I
      have absoultely no idea why.

      Let them test so they can see for themselves

      Cheers man.



      Originally Posted by Trent Brownrigg View Post

      This is about like saying that you can't use a free blogger (blogspot) blog if you want to make money online. And a lot of people say that. Yet the #1 ranked site for Make Money Online (and just about every other related keyword phrase) is a free blogger blog.
      No this isn't like that at all. This is all about whether an internet marketer will be turned off
      by a money making product on a .info domain or not.

      Most do even if they don't admit it.

      And that obviously leads to a good question, should you sell an IM product
      on a .com or on a .info? I say .com
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175954].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

        And there are lots, and I mean lots of people like you and me.
        There are also lots, and I mean lots of people who have a foot fetish.

        It doesn't make them normal, and it doesn't make me care.
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175987].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Trent Brownrigg
    This is about like saying that you can't use a free blogger (blogspot) blog if you want to make money online. And a lot of people say that. Yet the #1 ranked site for Make Money Online (and just about every other related keyword phrase) is a free blogger blog.

    I will agree that a .com domain gives a little more credibility, at least in my eyes, and so does having your own domain/hosting... but that doesn't mean the person without them is a scammer or liar. A lot of rich people are very tight with their money and don't waste a cent if they don't have to. Maybe that is the case here.
    Signature

    You can find internet marketing strategies, SEO consulting, and tons of business advice at BAM!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2175952].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author crystalq
    I keep seeing this again & again. Today I was browsing
    on twitter and stumbled upon a profile of a person
    that claimed he's a millionaire from internet
    marketing.

    I check out his website (which sells an IM product)
    and it's a .info domain.
    Fake it till you make
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176368].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      Thread summary, after the OP:

      "You've got no proof of that, so we don't buy it as fact."

      "I don't need to prove it, since I already know it's a fact, because I believe it and I'm smart."

      "That's not proof."

      Blather. Rant. Repeat.


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176417].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
        Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

        Thread summary, after the OP:

        "You've got no proof of that, so we don't buy it as fact."

        "I don't need to prove it, since I already know it's a fact, because I believe it and I'm smart."

        "That's not proof."

        Blather. Rant. Repeat.


        Paul

        Internet Marketers:

        .com - Won't hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .com
        .info - Some will hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .info

        So obviously, it'll be better if you sell your IM product on a .com
        domain.

        You don't need to be smart to figure that out.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176448].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Tom B
          Banned
          Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

          Internet Marketers:

          .com - Won't hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .com
          .info - Some will hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .info

          So obviously, it'll be better if you sell your IM product on a .com
          domain.

          You don't need to be smart to figure that out.

          I would hesitate to purchase any product whether it be a .com or a .info.

          Most of the time I never notice if it is a .com or a .info. Those .tv are really the ones to look out for.

          I must not be an internet marketer.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176463].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
          Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

          Internet Marketers:

          .com - Won't hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .com
          .info - Some will hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .info

          So obviously, it'll be better if you sell your IM product on a .com
          domain.

          You don't need to be smart to figure that out.
          Oh, here's a great product. Just what I've been looking for. And look, the price really fits my budget, and what a great bonus. I have to have this, it's perfect.

          Oops . . . it's a .info site, I guess I won't buy it. Damn, i really wanted it, too.

          ---

          No, sorry, I really don't see that happening very often.
          Signature

          Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176472].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
          Internet Marketers:

          .com - Won't hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .com
          .info - Some will hesitate to buy an IM product just because it's on a .info
          Enough to matter? That really is the question.

          I suspect a lot more will be turned off by whatever sales format you choose (none of them appeals to everyone), and that the .info/.com stuff is so low it's lost in the noise.

          That assumes it even exists. A lot of people say they'll do X, Y or Z, until they're put in the position where they actually have to make a decision. And then they look at some extraneous factor to explain a decision they don't want to face directly. That is an extremely common thing.

          And there's the very real possibility that an info product on a .info site will ring true with some folks, which may offset the .com prejudice, possibly in a profitable direction.

          You continue to assert this stuff as fact, when there is not one shred of proof for it. The rest of us simply question it. Largely because of the lack of proof...


          Paul
          Signature
          .
          Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176492].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
            Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

            Enough to matter? That really is the question.

            I suspect a lot more will be turned off by whatever sales format you choose (none of them appeals to everyone), and that the .info/.com stuff is so low it's lost in the noise.

            Yes of course, a lot more will be turned off by the sales
            format rather than the tld. But hey, this is not something
            that requires additional work. All you need to do is spend
            $8 a year instead of $1.

            And even if you get only one or 2 extra sales because
            it's .com, that would still be worth it if they exceed $8. *


            * Now alright, you like to be 100% sure of something before
            saying it. You'll probably say, there's no telling if you'll
            generate more sales or less sales.

            But let's think about this for a second...

            I highly doubt that a .info domain will ring true with a website
            where the owner claims that he makes plenty of money and
            sells an infoproduct that teaches people how to make money.

            What do you think?

            The way I see it, by using a .info to sell a product like that
            you would be giving people another reason to become more
            suspicous.


            Which is why I keep saying that I'm sure that .com will work better
            for this.

            Now I perfectly understand your comments. You're trying to show
            people that they need to test before making conclusions.

            I understand that and I respect that.

            But I think that deep down, you know that it'll probably
            be worth it to use .com to sell that kind of product.

            Cheers
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176603].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
              Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

              I highly doubt that a .info domain will ring true with a website where the owner claims that he makes plenty of money and sells an infoproduct that teaches people how to make money.
              Hm.

              "Tip 1: Every time you buy a .info instead of a .com, you save $8 a year. This may not seem like a lot, but when you have thousands of domains it starts to add up. Only a few anal-retentive freaks care what extension your domain has anyway, and if you spend half of that $8 you saved on PPC traffic you'll more than make up for any sales you might have lost."
              Signature
              "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176642].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                I highly doubt that a .info domain will ring true with a website where the owner claims that he makes plenty of money and sells an infoproduct that teaches people how to make money.
                Why? How does that have anything to do with the issue? I'm pretty good at seeing other perspectives, and looking for what's right in them. I can't wrap my head around the idea that the TLD has anything to do with the credibility of the product or merchant. It just doesn't make sense, except as a function of mental habit.
                But I think that deep down, you know that it'll probably be worth it to use .com to sell that kind of product.
                No, I don't think it will matter. At all. But that's not proven, either way.

                When I said that a .info domain for an info product rings truer for me, I meant it. It just seems more congruent.


                Paul
                Signature
                .
                Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176674].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
                  Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

                  I can't wrap my head around the idea that the TLD has anything to do with the credibility of the product or merchant.
                  Some people buy a .info because they're really short on cash. Now
                  obviously, that's NOT the only reason. Others buy them to
                  save money, while some others may buy them because they
                  like them, etc...

                  But is "rich joe" really selling his IM product on a .info because he
                  likes .info? Or is he selling it on a .info because he's lying, and in
                  reality he's short on cash and he's trying to make a buck by selling
                  false information? (There's always this possibility)

                  Different people, different opinions. In a scenario like that my
                  thoughts will be the latter.

                  Anyway, I'll close here, otherwise this debate will contnue
                  to go forever... lol
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176720].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                    Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

                    But is "rich joe" really selling his IM product on a .info because he likes .info? Or is he selling it on a .info because he's lying
                    Whenever you find yourself wondering "Is this person stupid or evil?" - the answer is almost invariably "stupid."

                    For example, someone might think that you are pushing people away from .info domains because you have some secret method of making lots of money with .info domains, and you are trying to hog all of them to yourself. That would be evil.

                    But the answer is pretty much never "evil."
                    Signature
                    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176734].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Cezar R Abadiano
              Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

              I highly doubt that a .info domain will ring true with a website where the owner claims that he makes plenty of money and sells an infoproduct that teaches people how to make money.
              I don't thing whether or not you have a .info or .com will matter if you claim to be making a lot of money on that site.

              Wouldn't a human being's inherent suspicion kick in simply from the very claim that you're making millions? Wouldn't they ask why then are you selling anything if you already have millions.

              And if you are doing this to help people then why are you charging us for it?

              You know those kinds of questions would pop in my mind if I see a site with the owner claiming to make a lot of money.

              I don't even bother nor care about whether it's .info, .com or .net.

              And I would think people are like that.

              My own opinion of course.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176713].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
          Originally Posted by IM Headlines View Post

          You don't need to be smart to figure that out.
          You really don't seem to grasp this.

          Everybody hates lightboxes. But we use them, and people buy.

          Everybody hates exit pop-ups. But we use them, and people buy.

          Everybody hates long sales pages. But we use them, and people buy.

          Everybody hates fake chat scripts. But we use them, and people buy.

          Everybody hates computer-animated salespeople. But we use them, and people buy.

          Everybody hates "who else wants to" in the headline. But we use that, and people buy.

          Then... after they buy... they come here and tell everybody how much they hate what they just saw, demanding to know why we still do it.

          Because people buy.

          You can tell me you'll never buy from a .info until you're blue in the face.

          The fact is, you'll buy from EVERY .info you EVER see that has a product you actually want on it.

          You are never going to walk away from the product you want just because it's on a .info domain. You are walking away from this one because you think the seller is scamming you. And you think it has something to do with the .info domain.

          It doesn't. And so long as you believe it does, you are a perfect customer for anyone and everyone that thinks it's ethical to sell garbage to the gullible. Because you don't know why you buy.
          Signature
          "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176561].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author George Wright
    Paul,

    You just gave me a great idea for a URL to add to my collection. BlatherRantRepeat.com

    On second thought I think I'll grab BlatherRantRepeat.info

    George Wright
    Signature
    "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176460].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author txconx
    I think most people don't notice the extension unless they're trying to go back to a site and then they will default to dot-com.

    But I don't understand why you'd stick with dot-info if the dot-com was available. Even if it wasn't available at first, if it becomes available later, it would be smart to buy it and then redirect.

    Face it - dot-com is the top TLD in everyone's mind. I wouldn't built a business on a dot-info, but I might put a site that is what you'd expect to see on a dot-info domain name - an information site. But definitely not a business.

    However, I don't advise anyone to spend thousands of dollars on a domain name unless you have a very good plan for how you will profit from it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176461].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author zachary0611
    I use .infos for redirects
    Signature
    Professional Web Designers www.WebDesignBros.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176493].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      By the way, IMH... I have no real interest in convincing you on this topic. That's usually a losing bet when someone has their ego invested in a conclusion. Besides, it's possible that your conclusion may turn out to be right. Asserting it as fact is not, however, when there are so many other credible scenarios that could also be right.

      My goal here is to show the folks who haven't made up their minds, based on nothing, how to look at and for alternative possibilities. To ignore assumptions as having no value other than as a basis for testing.

      If someone does a properly controlled test and comes up with a statistically significant result, I will adopt that as a working theory. For that market.

      Until then, none of us know. But some of us know we don't.


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176521].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author coluden
    A .info is often used for many reasons, and I would not take offense at that. I would however be seriously offended at anyone who claims to be a millionaire if he is clearly not. Lying to gullible newbies is most disdainful.

    coluden
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176601].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jjpmarketing
    Any domain can be monetized when it comes to the major TLD's like .com, .net, .org, .biz, etc. etc.

    However from a traffic standpoint, keep in mind that .com is the first TLD your browser searches for. If you hit ctrl + enter it will go directly to the .com of whatever you typed in the URL bar.

    .com will always be the undisputed king of TLD's.

    But the success of a website has more to do with the effort put into promotions, seo, content, etc. than it does with the TLD being used. As far as tracking goes, that is what Google Analytics and similar software is for.

    Dennis
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2176751].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author derekwong28
    I am really surprised how this thread had gone. The $8 saving is for the first year only, you pay the full .com price the second and subsequent years.

    I thought what the OP said was quite reasonable in the beginning but then went off track. If you want a domain for your main business, why should register the .info domain when the .com is available? Given that the lifetime savings is only $8?

    Even if the .com is taken, why would you want to register any other extension for your main business? For a start, you are diluting your brand as customers may confuse your business with that of the .com. Also, there is a small chance that the owner of the .com domain may have registered it as a trademark.

    I understand why gurus and highly experienced marketeers may use lots of .info domains. I do accept all the arguments raised here and have up to 500 .info at any one time. However, I would not think of using it as my main website. The thought of using a .info domain for the main website is completely unthinkable in e-commerce.

    Of course, most customers do not care. But those who do may turn out to be your most important ones. It could be those who are interested in placing large trade orders or super-affiliates doing research on your website. That is why they may be interested in small things like the presence of a physical address, a contact telephone number, an SSL certificate, BBB seals etc. etc. This is why I really cannot see why you want to use a .info domain for your main business if you only save $8 for the lifetime of your business.

    Derek
    Signature

    Do not get between a wombat and a chocolate biscuit; you will regret it dearly!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2178671].message }}

Trending Topics