15 replies
Does anybody have a link or an offer for me for plr articles (Make Money Online and Blogging niche!!!!). I bought a membership where there is plr articles but i want more!!!!


thanks alot guys, you are the best.
#articles #plr
  • Profile picture of the author Jill Carpenter
    Signature

    "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795015].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cweber
    Here ya go man. I have been writing plr articles for a little while and may have some of what you are looking for.

    Article Packs | New Articles Everyday
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795033].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sheryl Polomka
    Hi Fazal

    The link in my signature is my PLR website, I have a few packs available in the IM niche including blogging.

    Take care
    Sheryl
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795048].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author brik2500
    Hey,

    these are some gems....cweber your site looks good, bookmarking for future reference.

    Thanks AvenueGirl and Sheryl bookmarking for yours as well. LOL...just don't get kicked out the forum before I can buy...LOL.

    CHEERS
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795060].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DireStraits
    I will state up-front that I don't know of any such PLR, myself - sorry.

    For what purpose(s) do you intend to utilise this PLR, though?

    If it's for any purpose that involves ranking well in Google or other search engines, you will normally need to re-write any PLR you have before publishing it anyway, just because it's often been published by so many others before you, and thus will be relegated to Google's supplemental index, seldom to be seen by anyone.

    So, in my mind, if you're going to buy PLR just to rewrite it, why not just scour the hundreds, thouands or hundreds-of-thousands of relevant articles already out there and mix up and rewrite those?

    I honestly don't see how basing one's content on PLR is any more efficient than doing just that, in most cases, when the content is intended to be ranked in search engines ... though I can see how it can be beneficial when used for an ebook, report, auto-responder series or anything else that isn't intended as search-engine food.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795102].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cindybidar
      Originally Posted by DireStraits View Post


      So, in my mind, if you're going to buy PLR just to rewrite it, why not just scour the hundreds, thouands or hundreds-of-thousands of relevant articles already out there and mix up and rewrite those?
      Because that's called plagiarism?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795445].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author paulie888
        Originally Posted by cindybidar View Post

        Because that's called plagiarism?
        Well, as long as it's not a blatant copy and significantly different (by 70% or more), I don't think it could be considered plagiarism.
        Signature
        >>> Features Jason Fladlien, John S. Rhodes, Justin Brooke, Sean I. Mitchell, Reed Floren and Brad Gosse! <<<
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795457].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author cindybidar
          Originally Posted by paulie888 View Post

          Well, as long as it's not a blatant copy and significantly different (by 70% or more), I don't think it could be considered plagiarism.
          So you're saying it's okay to simply rewrite copyrighted material and call it good?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795464].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author DireStraits
        Originally Posted by cindybidar View Post

        Because that's called plagiarism?
        Perhaps you misundersood the part (bolded) where I said:

        So, in my mind, if you're going to buy PLR just to rewrite it, why not just scour the hundreds, thouands or hundreds-of-thousands of relevant articles already out there and mix up and rewrite those?
        I apologise if I was misconstrued, but I wasn't suggesting anyone should take a single article and re-write it. Rather, I was suggesting that one could quickly read a number of articles and consolidate the information one would glean into their own, unique article. Sort of like how I suspect most people write articles, anyway - including authors of most of the PLR out there.

        If it was outright plagiarism I wouldn't be proposing it; I've had my content ripped and blatantly re-written, and it annoys me as much as the next person, for a number of reasons. But if you actually believe it's still plagiarism to take ideas or inspiration from multiple articles/sources and consolidate it in an original way, in a fresh, new, unique article... well, that's your opinion (and, respectfully, I'd argue that's all it is, too) - one I wouldn't agree with, myself.

        In that case, perhaps one should be asking oneself if the PLR content one buys is itself plagiarised, what with the strong likelihood of the author having taken inspiration from other, existing articles on the 'net, or from books, magazines or wherever.

        Also, what if I were to take some PLR I've bought, re-write and publish it, and then lay claim to the ideas, concepts or explanations therein, myself? Would that be grounds on which for me to accuse anyone else re-writing the same PLR, in their own words, as having plagiarised my content? Who is to say whose content they used for as a basis for their re-written article?

        Run a search on Google for practically anything. See if you can't find a handful of articles within the first 5 pages or so that tackle the same subject, in the same (or a similar) way, from the same (or a similar) angle. Perhaps every website owner should be filing a civil suit against the next because their content happens to bear some resemblence (no matter how loose) to one's own.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795729].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author cindybidar
          Originally Posted by DireStraits View Post

          Perhaps you misundersood the part (bolded) where I said:

          I apologise if I was misconstrued, but I wasn't suggesting anyone should take a single article and re-write it. Rather, I was suggesting that one could quickly read a number of articles and consolidate the information one would glean into their own, unique article. Sort of like how I suspect most people write articles, anyway - including authors of most of the PLR out there.
          Yes, I did misunderstand your point. My apologies to you for making that leap.

          Unfortunately, I'm sure you're right about how most people "research" online - by simply reading a bunch of stuff other people have written.

          The problem with this approach is, as Debbie stated, that you don't know if the facts you are repeating are even true. It's always best to go to the source, and by that I don't mean Ezine Articles or Wikipedia or About.com. University sites, government sites, corporate sites, published research papers, and (gasp!) actual books are far more reliable. Of course it's also much more work to write that way.

          To bring this back around to the OP (sort of)...how does using PLR fit with this research thing? First, make sure you buy high-quality PLR from reputable vendors. If you buy 100,000 articles for $4, they're junk. Not only were they not researched, they were more than likely stolen.

          Second, use it as a jumping off point. It will still save you a ton of time in the research department. It's a whole lot easier to verify a fact than to dig it up on your own.

          Lastly, reformatting is the key to good PLR usage. Article packs become ebooks, ebooks become membership sites or autoresponders, blog posts become podcasts. Ideally, you're not just "rewriting," you're creating a whole new thing based on research someone else did.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795771].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Debbie Allen
    Cindy's right....
    It's always best to respect the work of others - rewriting published articles is not a good idea. In fact, it can make you look bad. You never really know if those articles are based on research or not. Therefore, your re-worded articles may give misleading information.
    You're better off writing your own articles, hiring a freelance writer or using quality PLR content.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795484].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mattjay
    i found these guys
    Private Label Rights (PLR) Articles - Big Content Search
    they have a search engine style format it's pretty cool and a lot of articles.
    $97 per year.
    hope that helps
    mattj
    Signature



    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795748].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2795783].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Peggy Baron
    There's lots of IM PLR here that's well-written and if you look around I think you'll be pleased with what you see.

    You could also do a search IM plr + warrior forum.

    Peggy
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2798417].message }}

Trending Topics