Why People Submit Articles Like That!?

Perhaps that was a failed attempt at spinning an article? This had to have been created by some software or something....noone I know writes like this.

One thing is for sure: if this were my directory, the content would be deleted and the writer would be banned.

That seems like a computer-generated article. Either that or the person really don't speak English. Either way, it's probably someone just trying to get content out there for the backlink, while not caring about the quality.

I tell ya, if everyone just tried to contribute value, as opposed to crap like that, the internet would be a much better place

So many people have told them that you (somehow, mysteriously) get a "better backlink" if you spin the content of the article than submit it unchanged that they've started believing it, I think.

Mind you, on the other hand, to be fair to the author of this one, if phrases like "stressful amongst specifics, figure plus more jargon versus by now what to do together with" ever become popularly sought keywords, he'll have the market more or less cornered, won't he? Unless you go all churlish on him and decline the article, I suppose.

I often get 'spun' junk articles like this. I simply decline the article or ban the user. That article is nothing short of disgraceful. I actually find it offensive that someone would submit something like this when I'm giving them a nice dofollow juicy backlink.

Looks like some bad plr.

I screwed myself today. I was using Article Submitter Robot and I did all of the syntax for the spinning but I forgot to hit "spin" afterwards and I think it submitted my article with the spin syntax in it to about 400 article directories.

OMG, I was laughing so hard I could barely read the thing.... still have tears in my eyes. That is definitely an article from a spinner like magic article rewriter where you can use tokens and just hit spin. I tried it a few times and that is what kind of stuff you end up with because it uses synonyms and it isn't able to only replace with words that are actually relevant to the content.

Did I make sense there? Any way thanks for the laugh but I really hope you won't publish that.

That is some bizarre sort of digicam!!

I take it your article directory is only looking for articles based on marketing, business, or something of that nature?

Because people are dumb, and they don't need to waste their time synonym spinning articles unless they are going to appear on a Web 2.0 Blog. (Full Sentence and Paragraph spinning can be helpful).

Since I can write articles AND I can write software, I have often thought about making my own content generation software.

If ever I marry those two skills, I will call my software,

Darwinian Content Creator

The headline on the sales page would suggest that:

You Only Need One Monkey Behind The Computer
To Create Content That Will Bring Smiles To People In Forums

It's articles like this that give spinners such a bad rep - I hate article spinners for this very reason - they produce crap! Although I know if used correctly you can spin good articles (well apparently you can) I still prefer to hand write mine so I know what the article says and it isn't going to include any sentences that just don't make sense.

This example though is just laughable, has to be one of the worst! Although not as bad as that one that was mentioned the other day about 'like a fart in a gale of wind' or something like that

What are these people thinking!!!

Not sure but this is a good question! :>

I don't know what's the big deal about spinning. It takes me 5 minutes to rewrite an article to pass EZA and copyscape. I really don't understand why people use those terrible spinners. It's hell of a lot more work to find synonyms, feed all this data into the spinner, and proofread the spun article. It's much faster and easier to manually rewrite everything (there is a free tool that breaks article down into many paragraphs and helps you get organized when rewriting).

I submit the exact same article first to EZA, then everywhere else and never had any issues.

A lot of this content come from cheap SEO companies. They are the ones that say we will write and submit x articles for you to get a squillion backlinks. Or using article spam to bump client rankings. Most organizations that use this practice come from a country (won't name it as I don't want to bash as per forum rules) about half way between Europe and the pacific ... and you can get a good curry there.

Process is simple - either just steal an article from the web or pay their internal writer $0.50 to create a reasonable seed article. Next, open up something like the best spinner (fantastic program, own it myself - but like any great tool, it can be abused). Set it to replace all possible words with 3,4 or 5 variations. Hit go.

In about 2 minutes you have a spun article that reads like rubbish. Spam it out and let the accepting publisher worry if it is good enough quality.

i could see it as being written in russian, or pushtu first, then sent through a free translator then spun. Maybe even written in russian, translated to pushtu then translated to english then spun.

I wrote a tradesman course and had to throw a few of the modules into french, it came out about 90% correct for the guy, readable an mostly understandable for him. But I started to play with the translator and when I took the french and tried to translate back to english it looked a lot like the article you have up there.

I'm sure there is someone making money selling this system to someone somewhere. Otherwise no one would be doing it.

Translated to french: Je suis sûr quil ya quelqu'un qui gagne l'argent en vendant ce système à quelqu'un quelque part. Sinon, personne ne le ferait.

French to Italian:Sono sicuro che qualcuno Quil che guadagna i soldi vendendo questo sistema a qualcuno da qualche parte. In caso contrario, nessuno.

Italian back to eng: Quil I'm sure that someone who earns money by selling this system to someone somewhere. Otherwise, no.

Then spin it a couple times.... hahaha! No digicams though...

excuzemee is kinda on to something. I think it may be a combination of spinners and the "author" not being the least bit acquainted with English. I get the same type of articles, they're good for a laugh before I hit the trash button.

I think it is new to article spinning. even after taking help from this kind of software they must check once if it is really meaning full or not..

I tried to read the first sentence but it hurt my brain.

It's SEO. If you check the article, I'm sure you'll find that "digicam" is a link to their site. That article creates backlinks to their site, which helps them move up the ranks at search engines.

I've been scrapping an article directory lately, and have noticed that some users repost the same article over and over again but with different titles.

Just out of interest, what site is the author of that article linking to? it would be interesting to see how many backlinks Yahoo finds for it, and to see if it has any pagerank.

what is the website address of that article directory?

I think the fellow is trying to submit an unprofessionally spun article.

I hope that was a spun article! If it was an example of the author's actual writing, he or she needs to give back all the pens, paper and other writing implements (including computers) he or she has and stick to drawing pictures with crayons or something.

No, really!

Vince Runza

Well, I guess there is some "gurus" or other "characters" who teach the wrong stuff (like "any link is a link" sort of stuff)...

I have several blogs and see the same problem. I am also a member of Unique Article Wizard and article submissions are moderated in this system (unlike in other systems), which avoids a lot of crap. However, in this system you see that people submit to totally off topic categories (like an article about cars to a category like "travel" or something of the sort).

Problem is also that the spinner software out there is crappy. Believe me, I have tried a lot of those and even The Best Spinner (which I think is pretty ok) is far from flawless. Since I want to make a living on the Net I am doing some testing now to create a far more effective way of spinning. It will take more time to write an article, but after that you will be able to do decent submissions with quality content and without words glued together, double spaces, typos and what have you...

I am online now for a year and I have seen so many articles like your example, it isn't even funny. It is wasting of everybody's time, you are totally right on that. I hope to finish my testing soon so I can make this new way of spinning available to all... Probably for free and Word based so anybody with Word on his computer can use it. If anybody is interested in such a feature, let me know in this thread so I can also see if this is needed and wanted or that I am just think this is needed while it actually isn't.

I think main task of such kind of articles is to get backlink, normally these kind of articles have one or two backlinks in author resource. To us they are useless to them they work.

It's just another form of spam, pure and simple. I tested out a... hmm... well-known automated article submission software, thinking, OK, let's see what this is all about. I carefully hand-spun an article - no automated 'synonimizing', that's just a joke, as we see in the OP. Unfortunately, I tried some fancy nested spinning of the article title too, and it went wrong, left in all the variants, complete mess, and it went out to dozens of article directories like that, and got published by a fair number, I might add! Very embarassing. Now I just republish articles by hand to a few choice directories, after EZA has approved of course, with minimal rewriting. Most article directories seem to NOT be bothered about dupe content...

I also looks like and article that was translated through an automated translator, probably a IM with no acess to a good translating service!

LOL! Looks like a poorly spun article. Spun articles can be almost indistinguishable from unique ones, but you have to put in the work and spin them properly. Otherwise you just get worthless junk like that.

Just someone trying to spin an article without success. I don't know why people would think submitting an article like that would even be beneficial. No one is even going to read past the first sentence.

I would have made about half way thru the first sentence before I deleted it. I won't let stuff like that waste my time, it's too valuble.