What Do You Think of Rehashed Information?

by 109 replies
138
For some reason I've been seeing a lot of comments about "rehashed" content lately. Most of it is derogatory, and often coming from folks still trying to establish themselves in IM.

Like most folks I reckon, I like original content, and I've written a ton of it myself. I can appreciate those who prefer originality and new thinking about time-worn topics.

On the other hand, there are only so many ways to describe things. If you read enough on one subject it's going to all seem like rehashed information. This is true whether you're reading websites, ebooks, print books, or magazines. When you know a topic well enough, it's always the same old in different words.

Newbies can take a big clue from that. If you're finding the information in products you buy is something you already know...



You're going to learn some things by reading, and some things by doing. If you're reading the same old things, it's time to start doing.

And as far as rehashed content goes, there's room for everyone. Different writers and different styles of writing appeal to different people. And while the thrust of each "rehash" may be very similar, I almost always find at least one or two points that give me food for thought.

Besides, there's duplication in every industry, online and offline. It's called competition. You shouldn't expect it to be any different in IM.

The next time you feel like complaining about rehashed information, think how it would be if there were only one maker of pizza, only one boy wins girl movie, only one of anything with no other products competing.

I like having choices. What about you?
#main internet marketing discussion forum #information #rehashed
  • Nicely said Dennis I am a fan of rehashed info ( PLR ) You just have to know when to use, where to use it, and how to use it. Only unique content on my blog. But for other tasks rehashed info has its uses. I like the way you broke it down good post!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Yeah, generally speaking, rehashing is a myth, though there are exceptions.

    I think a better term would be re-angling.

    All the best,
    Michael
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • I'm not a big fan of hash.

    Wait...

    What was the question?
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • If one method is called rehashed just becasue it was produced by, for example, 100 marketers using different words; it can also be used thousand times by just applying unique twists to it rather crying over buying something you had read.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • If people really think about it, All information for the most part is rehashed.

    Its just presented and organized differently than before.

    As a graphic designer, one of the things we are taught is that designing is simply taking the elements that you know or have been exposed to, but arranging them in new and different ways. Thus, the more elements you have been exposed to and know about, the more elements you can pull from and add to your graphic design work.

    Now, I know you are talking about content, but in my opinion its almost the same.

    Very, very few people come up with something totally new and unique, they just put a great spin or presentation and then repackage.

    They may have 1 or 2 unique ideas maybe, who knows, either way nothing is completely unique. We are limited to 26 letters in the english alphabet and all people use those same letters (if they speak or write english) and they just arrange them in ways that are different than others. But the letters used are all re-hashed.

    I know what I said may sound kinda funny, but its another way to look at things. Honestly, how far can people go with this type of stuff? They can't re-invent the wheel, its already been invented. All they can do, is take bits and pieces of information and rearrange them.

    Now, if some new technology, knowledge or information arises, then yes, that can be considered not re-hashed.

    I promise I am not drinking, smoking or taking any drugs............!
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • There is nothing new under the sun...

    Well, there are computers, and everything outside of the Milky Way, but everything else has been talked about at some point previous.

    It is hard to make a new product based on information that is totally new, but I can assure you that my interpretation of that information may permit you to take new insight about the information you have never realized in the hundreds of times you had seen that information before.

    I have people refund because they say that I completely rehashed known information, yet if you already had the information in a format that was useful to you, why did you buy my product in the first place?

    You are not looking for new information; you are looking for new insights about existing information, right?

    , travel to planet Xectarious Troy... (If you haven't seen the satellite images yet, they are awesome... Check it out at the link I gave you...)


    "Rehashed" is the favorite drop word of people who think "knowledge" is more important than "insight"...

    Yet, those who truly value "insight" will beat everyone else to the top of the ladder of success...

    Think about that last sentence...

    It really has the potential to change your life forever for the better...
    • [ 4 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Actually there is nothing new under the sun, because all the elements that will ever exist are already in existance. They just change forms and states....

      Computers are just the same old elements arranged in a new way....
      • [1] reply
  • Dude, like 80% of all the cheep products out there are Rehashed Information!!

    I hate that!!

    • [3] replies
    • I think i've read this post somewhere else....


      Just kidding man, great info.
      • [1] reply
    • @ Steve - I think your analogy between written content and graphics is a valid comparison. You get it.

      @ Bill - Great post, especially this point: Yet, those who truly value "insight" will beat everyone else to the top of the ladder of success...

      Kevin, if 80% of what you buy is rehashed, what are you missing that makes you keep buying information on the same subjects? If you already know what everyone is teaching, why are you still buying and reading instead of taking action and moving forward? I'm not being a wise guy, I'm trying to understand.
      • [3] replies
    • How did you come up with 80%?

      99% of statistics are made up on the spot.

      I hate that!

      Dennis, you hit it on the spot. If everything is rehashed to peeps, they need to stop buying and start doing.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • I tried making up my own alphabet so I could be more original, but I can't find a computer keyboard with my characters-so I guess I'll just have stick with these boring old ones.

    Great thread, and I really like your point, Dennis, that if a newbie reads a course and says to herself "man, I already know this-I'm learning nothing here"-then perhaps she should realize she has knowledge worth enough to take action.

    The complaint about rehash always makes me think of blues snobs that think white rock bands like Led Zep and the Stones are guilty of "ripping off" the original blues artists that inspired them. If that's true then those "original" artists were "ripping off" whoever came before them, etc. There's a lot of truth to the old saying "there's nothing new under the sun"-not 100%-but mostly true-which is why a really original artist or writer always stands out so much-but even they owe a debt to those who inspired and taught them.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • A newbie who reads a course and says "i already know this, I am not learning anything here", will continue to buy more wso's.
      • [2] replies
  • Ok about a month ago I published an article on my blog on jailbreaking iPad 4.2 using redsn0w jailbreak tool.

    About 2 weeks ago, some Mac magazine (I think it was MacLife but I am not sure) published an article teaching the same thing.

    Did they rehash off of me?

    Same goes in IM. The concepts are SAME and so is the plan of action many times.

    Rehashing is over rated
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I actually had a huge conversation with a fellow "warrior" about this and here is part of what I told him:
    Simply put, there are only so many ways of doing something.

    I am running a 5 figure a month business and to be honest, I don't have any "SECRETS".

    Now like Dennis said, if you are starting to come across "rehashed" information then I think it's time to start taking some action and to STOP consuming information.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • You're absolutely right, if you keep coming across information that you consider as "rehashed", then it's probably a very clear sign that you've been consuming way too much information on the topic, which isn't a good thing at all if you're still failing to take action.

      There's really nothing new under the sun when it comes to techniques/systems. As people have mentioned above, there can be insights gleaned from the way people interpret and disseminate information, and this should probably be the only reason why you should seek out more information products in IM - if you're still not able to properly grasp the concepts/techniques disseminated in order to be able to implement then.
  • With many topics I have found that I can understand how one person
    explains it more easily than others.

    I flash back to my first college statistics class. I enrolled in and
    dropped that class TWICE, two consecutive semesters because
    within 2-3 weeks I could see that I just wasn't getting it. The
    third time that I enrolled, I got a professor by the name of Marsha,
    whom I still remember to this day even though that was roughtly
    30 years ago. She explained the exact same material, and probably
    used the same book, but I got it when she explained it.

    I also often have to hear some things over and over again before
    they sink in. I even read certain books over and over again until
    they become a part of my thinking.

    So, I have absolutely no problem with rehashed materials, as
    long as it's accurate!


    Willie
    • [ 5 ] Thanks
    • [3] replies
    • Great point, Willie. Sometimes when the material is complex and intricate, listening/reading it repetitively can help tremendously, and so does getting exposed to the viewpoints and approaches of others, as it helps us to gain a fresh new perspective that might help us comprehend things better.

      The only caveat is that the information has to be accurate, and this can be a little hard to determine especially in the IM niche, which is fraught with misinformation and half-truths.

      As an aside, I can completely identify with the issues you had in college, because I had the very SAME trouble with my Calculus 2 class! I had to drop out twice as well, because I just wasn't able to truly comprehend what the professor was teaching, and it was coming across as abstract and arcane. It was such a relief when I took the class again for the 3rd time, and this was where everything 'clicked' and it seemed like I had a whole new window into what I previously had trouble grasping.

      Paul

    • That's exactly it Willie and I wrote an article not long ago about this in another forum. Some people you can learn from, because their dynamic of teaching to you is better suited to your needs. It's like people in general, some you click with and some you don't. Some products you're going to learn from and some you won't, all depends on the person pitching and your chemistry with them.
    • Willie,
      My thoughts exactly. I'm all in favor of rehased information especially when it can take a difficult subject and break it down into caveman concepts that I can understand, implement and ultimately profit from.

      Everyday there are more and more people exposed to things like adsense, PPC, article marketing, file uploading, wordpress...and the list goes on.

      If we were asked by any of those folks about those subjects we would essentially be providing rehashed information but to those virgin ears it would be a new and exciting realm of information.

      Beauty is often times in the eye of the beholder.

      Respectfully,
      Tim
  • [DELETED]
  • Kinda like the new 'offline businesses' used to be called 'business development', and before that 'Sales and Marketing'.
    • [1] reply
    • 10-12 years ago, teaching offline businesses to use the net
      was probably more focused on the "IM" niche but internet
      experts.

      Now, things are somewhat cycling back in that direction :-)

      You're right, it's not new although many of the tools and tactics are.

      Willie
  • Dennis,

    You may be onto something here. You mean to tell me that Dominos Pizza, Pizzahut, Shakeys, and Papa Johns aren't all EXACTLY the same "rehashed" pizza?

    Rod "Coffee-Made-Me-Do-It" Cortez
    • [2] replies
    • Great point, Rod. Let's not even get into what Starbuck's, Coffee Bean, Seattle's Best, Tully's and Caribou are doing ripping each other other off with "rehashed" coffee that all looks the same!
    • Of course they are, Rod. They are arranged differently and sold by different vendors, but they contain the same ingredients, just like ebooks contain the same ingredients but are worded differently by different authors.

      It's all so unnecessary. We just need one pizza maker, and one writer, and one point of view... :rolleyes:
      • [1] reply
  • That's exactly how I think about rehashed information. I appreciate people who writes good stuff even if it's rehashed. Some rehashed are better than the original.
  • 99.999% of the concepts are already out there, so just about everything is rehashed. I don't see the problem, personally.

    The concepts remain constant, but the message varies according to the author.

    Give the market what it wants. What's the big deal? It allcomes down to point of difference.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    In one sentence, I think it is all about different strokes for different folks.

    BTW, it is one of the secrets of success in internet marketing, article marketing...

    For example, you can use 5 keywords to write 5 rehashed articles in 5 rehashed ways.

    Rehashed information means "In My Own Opinion" which is most probably not your own opinion.

    One more thing before I go, every messenger has his own message.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Dennis,

      This could be another of those threads where people talk at cross purposes because they have different definitions of the word "rehashed" (just like the public's 'idea' of what spam is and the government's 'legal definition' of it).

      As some people have pointed out, there is a clear distinction between rehashing something (bordering on plagiarism) and collating ideas and presenting your own unique view. And is rewriting PLR also rehashing?

      I like to look at the matter in terms of translation.

      When I first came to Turkey, I would give friends and students Turkish translations of some of my favourite books. I used to get a bit hurt when the uniform reaction was, "Why do you like such a crap writer?"

      I now realise that the translations were awful. The core material was great but the interpretation was awful. There are few very good translators around (and the market encourages that by paying only a few dollars a page).

      When I find a translator who can do a really good literary translation, I will buy all his/her translations and give them to my friends.


      Martin
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    I think there's a big difference between "rehashed" information as in the Rehash King method of just rewording the same old stuff and putting a new name on it and selling it and information that is presented by competitors in the same niche based on their own experiences and their own take on a topic.

    With the latter, there may be some similar information in both products, because some facts will be the same, there's going to be differences in writing style, differences in opinions and some facts ... a different twist ... some things you hadn't read before, etc.

    I've read tons of ebooks on web flipping and none of them has been exactly the same and I've learned something new from each of them. That's just one example. There are plenty more.
    • [1] reply
    • I agree, Suzanne, there's bound to be some duplication and overlap of content, because the core subject being covered is the same.

      The crucial thing especially with IM products is being able to write about the information from personal experience, and not just by rewriting and combining information which you haven't actually implemented before.

      Fortunately, you can usually tell quite easily from the style of writing whether it was written from personal experience or not.
  • Rehashed information to someone, may be new information for another person so it's hard to distinguish I guess, but it's always something to consider. So I think you always have to be careful if you are going to call someone out for it because while it may not benefit you, it may someone else.
  • For those forumers who want a synonym for rehashed, it is re-used or rework.
    @Topic, yes, it is very clever to rehashed information but not all, just get only some information from the old information and then jumble it and combine with another words,phrases,sentences and paragraphs, just assure that you dont copy ALL his work because it is Plagarism
    • [1] reply
    • It may not be plagiarism, but it still won't be very helpful especially in IM if you're just using other people's words and insights in a slightly different form.
  • talking about dreams, tell me about your website thats in your sig. that looks interesting ?

    he's gone ? and a quick search shows multiple people (I found 4 in 4 minutes) rehashing that same sig link, surley they do not all own the same site ? sweat dreams
  • Not sure who the rehash king is but if someone is really doing that they should be reported so they get the boot. Maybe it already happened.

    I like what Suzanne wrote about flipping. There are many products on flipping, product creation, Amazon affiliate marketing, etc. As long as each person adds their own twist or angle to it then I don't consider it rehash.

    How many ways are there to tell people they can lose weight by eating less and exercising yet there are about a kabillion products out there on weight loss. So the overweight fella sits in McDonald's blaming the author for rehashing the same info he's read before but never took action.

    That's why people get angry about "rehashing" because they're looking for the magic pill to make money online, lose weight, etc.
    • [2] replies
    • Dennis,

      I agree, and for some acumen I've been seeing a lot of comments about "rehashed" agreeable lately. Best of it is derogatory, and generally advancing from association still aggravating to authorize themselves in IM.

      Like best association I reckon, I like aboriginal content, and I've accounting a ton of it myself. I can acknowledge those who adopt boldness and fresh cerebration about age-old topics.

      On the added hand, there are alone so abounding means to call things. If you apprehend abundant on one accountable it's activity to all assume like acquired information. This is accurate whether you're account websites, ebooks, book books, or magazines. When you apperceive a affair able-bodied enough, it's consistently the aforementioned old in altered words.

      Newbies can booty a big clue from that. If you're award the advice in articles you shop for is article you already know...

      ...maybe that's a big clue that you apperceive abundant to alpha demography action!

      You're activity to apprentice some things by reading, and some things by doing. If you're account the aforementioned old things, it's time to alpha doing.

      And as far as acquired agreeable goes, there's allowance for everyone. Altered writers and altered styles of autograph address to altered people. And while the advance of anniversary "rehash" may be actual similar, I about consistently acquisition at atomic one or two credibility that accord me aliment for thought.

      Besides, there's duplication in every industry, online and offline. It's alleged competition. You shouldn't apprehend it to be any altered in IM.
      The abutting time you feel like accusatory about acquired information, anticipate how it would be if there were alone one maker of pizza, alone one boy wins babe movie, alone one of annihilation with no added articles competing.

      Know what I mean?

      ~Bill

      :p
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
    • Alan, I missed this post earlier... in my humble opinion, this is one of the most intelligent posts I've read here for a while.

      Your wieght loss analogy is 110% on the money.

      Our job is to determine what the market wants... then give it to them.

      Many IM'ers are waiting for that magic solution, instead of just getting on with it.

  • The IM niche: Have content people want to read, get their trust, then use that trust to sell them something.

    The diet/fitness niche: Exercise and eat well.

    The dating niche: Develop your personality and be confident.

    We've been doing nothing but rehashing since the beginning of time. We sell the writer, we sell the dream, we sell the differences that make *our* way the One True Path, and the *other* ways inferior. We practically never sell something new and revolutionary.

    Google just rehashed Excite. So it goes.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I haven't written a product myself yet, but I'm okay with the idea of rehashed information. I've bought probably about $100 worth of WSOs in the past couple of weeks and I've learn HEAPS from them. Every single one has taught me something new and I'm sure a lot of it is rehashed - some of them even touch on similar things.

    But all of them bring new ideas to my mind and so I think they are worth my money.

    So as long as it's not a blatant copy of another's work then I think it's fine, but the person 'rehashing' should also add their own views and ideas ontop of whatever content they are basing their new work on.
    • [1] reply
    • Dennis, I think a lot of people are getting sidetracked here, debating the meaning of "rehashed"...

      The main point I got out of your post is that if the material is starting to seem repetitious, it's time to stop reading and start doing.

      Spending some time actually trying to do what you've read will accomplish a couple of things...

      First, you'll own the information, and know what you need to learn next.

      Second, you'll be able to spot who has walked the walk and who is full of beans.

      Yep, looks like a rehash of Maverick Money Makers...:rolleyes:
      • [1] reply
  • When I was in college I bought lots of mathematics books. All of them contained nothing but rehashed information.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Didn't pi add a few billion figures after the decimal point a couple of years ago?


      Martin
      • [1] reply
  • That would not be hard to do at all, someone with a little time on his hands and an iota of initiative could quite easily accomplish this.

    P.S. I keep seeing this repeated reference to the Rehash King...is this some mythical, made up person, or does he really exist? LOL
    • [1] reply
    • Paulie, see my reply to Alan Peterson in my previous post.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • There is a lot of rehashed stuff out there, which I dont mind, after all if you dont know it already I dont suppose it matters where you learn it.

    What I dont like is product launches that claim to be all brand new but are really just a lot of information you already know. Instant Refund Time
  • Well said .... It's not the re-hashed information per se that is annoying. It the claims by authors that the re-hashed information is "new", that really pisses me off.

    (rant over ..)
  • The OP asks what do I think of rehashed info?

    Tp be honest, there is always going to be rehashed content, especially when so many newbs are taught to sell how products in IM.

    That said, I see nothing wrong with something that seeks to impove a concept. For example, if a complex topic is broken down into steps.

    I create many products based on topics that are out there, such as setting up a blog. But I create them as tutorials, rather than an ebook. Why? Because the easier they are to follow, the more success my clients wil attain.

    That said, the rehashed info which teaches you nothing new and is merely a re-wrtie of another product... sucks big time.

    From a product creator's point of view, I always look for a better way to package info. And as someone else mentioned... every messemger has a unique message.

    I know that I have purchased many products which are rehashed by definition, but only 1 or 2 of them actually made sense for me to apply.
    • [1] reply
    • That's an excellent approach. That's adding value.

      Yes but, because you don't learn something new doesn't mean no one is. This goes back to what I said in the original post ... if you're discovering you're learning nothing new, maybe that's the time to quit reading and start doing.
      • [1] reply
  • If writers would only read content for comprehension before writing about a topic, then fewer people would complain about "rehashed" content.
  • Sal - turning knowledge into step-by-step tutorials and including coaching is adding a TON of value to the mix. I'm sure you're adding your own insights as well. Sorry, but I can't award you rehash king status because of the added value.
  • And to throw in my two cents here guys, the one place I can find rehashed content any day of the week is not here on our beloved forum, but on Ebay.

    I've bought many, many IM products over the last six years, and 97% of them have been unique and while may be identical, all have their own twist and turns on them. Except for anything I've snagged from Ebay. You've got everyone who thinks they're a resell-rights master on there selling the same product as everyone else.

    Blah to that. I found one, ONE gem on ebay years ago, written by Kabita Kalita, and it showed how to dominate google's top 10 slots with your webpages.

    I bought that back in 06. That technique still works today, it just requires a bit more work than it used to. But It can still be done. That is a fantastic product.

    -Sean
  • Even though I am a big fan of and also love to say I like original content, deep inside I do know that every content is just original to the writer or producer. Because there is always going to be someone out there that must have some how thought like you or written something similar to yours. And for that person your content or product will be considered as rehash.
  • Even though I am a big fan of and also love to say I like original content, deep inside I do know that every content is just original to the writer or producer. Because there is always going to be someone out there that must have some how thought like you or written something similar to yours. And for that person your content or product will be considered as rehash.
  • Even though I am a big fan of and also love to say I like original content, deep inside I do know that every content is just original to the writer or producer. Because there is always going to be someone out there that must have some how thought like you or written something similar to yours. And for that person your content or product will be considered as rehash.:p
    • [1] reply
    • That's true. And you know what? If you put out your product first and someone else puts out a similar product a year later, if someone finds the other guy's product first yours is the one that will seem like the rehash to the buyer, even though yours was out a year sooner.
  • IMO there two distict schools of rehashing. The first, which I cannot stand, is what Chris Kent posted about here

    I hate these practices and I wish it could be stopped somehow, but it cannot and will not ever be put to an end. Even if we found a way to weed it out of the WSO section, people would still clean up reselling this stuff at DP and other forums


    The other form of rehashing, as many of you have already discussed here, is not rehashing at all, but rather reinterpreting and re-purposing information. Selling old ideas in a new if way, if you will.

    Of course, there's nothing wrong with it, it's been done for thousands of years and will still be done for many years to come.

    That being said, I know where a lot of this rehash animosity comes from....


    Most of this rehashed complaining stems from activity on the forums. You know the ones I'm talking about. The place where the cool kids hang out and spend time talking about how lame the Warrior forum is.

    You see, the guys who chill on these forums are the true 1337 marketers, and not l4mz0rz like everyone here at WF. They "invent" ALL the real methods of making money, and anything posted anywhere else is just rehashed crap.

    In fact, they're sooo elite they have a whole massive section of their site dedicated to giving away information products--namely WSOs. Is it because they're desperately trying to find a way to make money quick (a.k.a. Silver Bullet Syndrome)?

    Of course not!

    They do it because information products are so useless they would be repulsed if anyone had to pay money for them.




    The story of their members usually go something like this...

    Newbie joins WF

    Newbie buys a bunch of WSO and fails to make money

    Newbie post a bunch of newbie threads in the Main Discussion forum

    Newbie doesn't get the answers he was hoping for and figures out these methods require too much work

    Newbie keeps buying WSOs until he stumbles across one teaching some methods in the dark arts

    Newbie is intrigued about these opportunities to make easy money without working hard

    Newbie finds a new home in the other forum where he soon learns about how lame the WF and how everyone here is just ripping people off with their rehashed crap

    Newbie needs to fit in so he dubs himself a professional and starts practicing his WF bashing along with everyone else

    Time passes and Newbie still isn't making money, so he returns to the WF, but this practice of calling everything a rehash has stuck with him

    Newbie is still presenting himself as a professional and all the newer newbies look up to him and follow his lead

    The cycle continues...
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Periodically, we see threads from young folks asking if they should go to college or concentrate on IM, since the ones asking are inevitably 'making bank', 'crushing it' or some other expression of making money.

      (Yes, your honor, I do have a point. Yes, I'll make it now...)

      As anyone who has taken a class that involves chemistry, physics, something mechanical or electronic knows, you often memorize in the classroom and learn in the lab. Having a teacher tell you that mixing two chemicals is not a good idea has none of the effect of losing your eyebrows testing the statement.

      The same goes for anyone who has taken a programming course, or taught themselves to write code. Or graphic artists. Or...

      You can read all you want about the concepts, but unless you actually run your code or start stacking object in Photoshop, or whatever, you don't really know what you know for sure.

      If everything starts to sound rehashed, get your fanny out of the classroom and into the lab, dammit!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Brilliant idea-I can feel a ebook coming on-"Product Creation Gold: Secrets of Mining the Warrior Forum"-just kidding of course-that is a despicable tactic.

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 138

    For some reason I've been seeing a lot of comments about "rehashed" content lately. Most of it is derogatory, and often coming from folks still trying to establish themselves in IM. Like most folks I reckon, I like original content, and I've written a ton of it myself. I can appreciate those who prefer originality and new thinking about time-worn topics.