Another n00b question: Analyzing Market Samurai Results
I'm doing research on a niche and have focused on two different, but similar keywords. Ran them through market samurai and am currently trying to analyze the results.
I've attached the 2 spreadsheets from MArket Samurai in XLS form (w/domains excluded)
From what i've read and currently know about keyword research, it appears that I have a better shot at ranking on the first page of google in example 1, vice example 2. My reasoning for this is because of the low number of external backlinks (column G), low pank rankings and 'N' across the board.
It seems that i would have a harder time against domains example 2 because of the high number of external backlinks pointing to the specific pages.
Am i reading/analyzing my results correctly? do you need more data to go along with this, such as the results of the keyword search?
I can tell you that the keyword search that corresponds to example 1 was minimal... i.e., there wasn't any data.
the keyword search that corresponds to example 2 are as follows:
SEOT = 307
PBR = 82%
SEOC = 111,000 (high, i know)
AWCPC = $.96
AWV = $.96
SEOV = #294.28
hopefully this is enough data for you to help me. every time i look at the data, part of me thinks that im analyzing the data wrong. hopefully im on the right track and if not, someone can point me in the right direction
also, which one would you go with, and why?
Thanks again!
-
Michael Shook -
Thanks - 1 reply
Signature{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3098668].message }}-
captainbohica -
Thanks - 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3098707].message }}-
Michael Shook -
Thanks
Signature{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3098732].message }} -
-
-