I wonder what video software this is. He is making a killing with clickbank.

16 replies
Hey guys does anybody know how this video was created? It's interested how he it has captured attention of many in like a month and it is promoting a clickbank product.
#clickbank #killing #making #software #video
  • Profile picture of the author E. Brian Rose
    If you have advanced knowledge of non-linear editing software like Adobe Premiere or even Sony Vegas, then you should be able to recreate this. You would have to start with having the graphics on hand, though. This video wasn't created by using some $37 tool found in the WSO section. It was created by a skilled editor.
    Signature

    Founder of JVZoo. All around good guy :)

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3228044].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WillR
    I will tell you right now that all is not as it seems with that video.

    I will always be a little skeptical about how many views and comments a video has got when its sole purpose is to promote an affiliate product. There are plenty of ways to increase your view count and get comments posted without having real, organic visitors to your video - a lot of marketers will do this to try and get their video ranking higher in the Youtube results.

    It is a dead giveaway though with this video - they have been too greedy and no doubt Youtube's algorithms have already figured this out and the video will get bugger all organic traffic sent to it.

    Look at how many comments and likes the video has already had in ratio to the number of views. 553 comments from 27,840 views. That equates to a comment from 1 in every 50 viewers - that kind of ratio is unheard of on Youtube. And it wouldn't take an idiot to realise this just by reading through the comments. You can tell they are all just general comments from people who haven't even watched the video and have just been paid to comment.

    You will also notice by going through all the pages of comments that each comment says it was posted 3 weeks ago. Wow, what a coincidence huh?! All those comments 3 weeks ago and not once since!

    So I wouldn't care how this video was made. It hasn't been successful so why would you want to mimic it?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3228184].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mojojuju
      Originally Posted by WillR View Post


      Look at how many comments and likes the video has already had in ratio to the number of views. 553 comments from 27,840 views. That equates to a comment from 1 in every 50 viewers - that kind of ratio is unheard of on Youtube. And it wouldn't take an idiot to realise this just by reading through the comments. You can tell they are all just general comments from people who haven't even watched the video and have just been paid to comment.

      You will also notice by going through all the pages of comments that each comment says it was posted 3 weeks ago. Wow, what a coincidence huh?! All those comments 3 weeks ago and not once since!

      That's some good detective work buddy.
      Signature

      :)

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3228309].message }}
  • 1-0 WillR ding ding ding
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3228312].message }}
    • Looks like basic Flash to me with After Effects added for special seasoning.
      Signature
      Marketing is not a battle of products. It is a battle of perceptions.
      - Jack Trout
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3270000].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vishalduggal
    Don't wear underwear in BAD! LOL now that's funny and hilarious:p
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3270161].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DPM70
    I realise that the comments and views are manufactured, but even so, that is a damn good video.
    Signature
    I don't build in order to have clients. I have clients in order to build. - Ayn Rand
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3270194].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author paulie888
    Regardless of whether the view counts and traffic were manufactured, this is still a pretty slick video that was professionally edited with some pretty high end software. This is definitely not some hack job that you can pick up for $5 or even $50 - I feel it'd cost way more to have something like this custom made for you.
    Signature
    >>> Features Jason Fladlien, John S. Rhodes, Justin Brooke, Sean I. Mitchell, Reed Floren and Brad Gosse! <<<
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3270218].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author krisbeckers
    nice piece of film
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3270556].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author NateRivers
    I still prefer the page... written copy converts the best. (my opinion)
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3271991].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tommygadget
    I really liked that video. It probably took weeks to draw out the little figures, create the storyboards and write the copy that was read. The woman talking is also a professional. This video cost a bloody fortune so you know that the people behind it have money. As to the promotion, probably mechanical turk for the comments as was pointed out earlier. Still, as a video, it's very convincing and should convert very well. You really need to sell a lot of ebooks to pay for the video, though

    TomG.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3272015].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by ronsang90 View Post

    He is making a killing with clickbank.
    Did you really believe that, Ronsang?

    Why?!

    Originally Posted by WillR View Post

    You will also notice by going through all the pages of comments that each comment says it was posted 3 weeks ago. Wow, what a coincidence huh?! All those comments 3 weeks ago and not once since!

    So I wouldn't care how this video was made. It hasn't been successful so why would you want to mimic it?
    Absolutely right, thanks for pointing this out, Will.

    It's so easy for people to fall for stuff like this, apparently. :confused:
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3272042].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author focused
    The video was really impressive from a technical standpoint.

    However, I thought the copy took a downturn during the last half of the video.

    It started to feel a little creepy to me.

    Also, the dingy rust-colored background throughout the video was a poor choice.

    There should have been a change to bright colors and sharper written text near the end when the call to action was made.

    Overall, the graphic technique was the best thing about the video, otherwise it seemed fairly mediocre.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3923647].message }}

Trending Topics