Graphic Infringement Claim

by aeriol
42 replies
Today i received a letter austensibly from Getty Images claiming a graphics ingfringement with regards to a small image on a website i had built for me by a designer from overseas through elance several years back. They are claiming i owe them $600.oo for using their graphic without a licence. Naturally the person who built the site at the time told me he had bought the rights etc etc. So getty is in the U.S. and I am in Canada. I am finding I need a little quicky legal advice ... don't want to get into a major bill over $600.00 as to what my position in this is. Has anyone dealt with something similar, knows a lawyer who would advice. Also does anyone know if Bob Silber the internet lawyer is still around. Appreciate any help you can offer, either lawyers name and e-mail or previous experience in such matters. Obviously I now know to ask for proof of payment for images in the future. Thanks so much. Aeriol.
#claim #graphic #infringement
  • Profile picture of the author cchipster
    Tell them to get lost!
    Signature
    No signature, I'm sure you will be ok.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296394].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bobsilber
      Originally Posted by cchipster View Post

      Tell them to get F****D!
      Extremely foolish advice and a major reason you should never ask for legal advice on a marketing forum. For legal advice consult your attorney. You are infringing on their intellectual property if whoever you outsourced your work to, used a copyrighted image, without a license to do so. You are liable for that infringement whether the infringement was innocent or intentional. Consult with your lawyer.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296541].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author aeriol
        thank you but I was not looking for legal advice on this forum. merely to find out if others had gone thru this and if anyone could suggest a solicitor. Now in doing my research online for the evening I am discovering that Getty Images certainly seems to have a major worldwide scam going on. So I will find a lawyer although no one has recommended one & get them to handle it. It is not clear that I am infringing on their copyright as they have not offered me any proof that they in fact have a copyright. That is what I would want to see first and that it predates my useage of the image.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297449].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MerlynSanchez
          Originally Posted by aeriol View Post

          thank you but I was not looking for legal advice on this forum. merely to find out if others had gone thru this and if anyone could suggest a solicitor. Now in doing my research online for the evening I am discovering that Getty Images certainly seems to have a major worldwide scam going on. So I will find a lawyer although no one has recommended one & get them to handle it. It is not clear that I am infringing on their copyright as they have not offered me any proof that they in fact have a copyright. That is what I would want to see first and that it predates my useage of the image.
          I don't understand why you say that they are running a scam.

          While I agree that they need to provide proof and I'm sure this is something your attorney will advise you on, I highly doubt that a company like Getty is going to spend the time and expense to go after people for $600 unless they legitimately believe they are being infringed upon. It costs them a lot more than $600 to go after you for $600.

          I have a friend who handles piracy issues for a major corporation and they don't do it for the money. They do it to maintain brand integrity and prevent greater revenue losses in the future.

          Not that I don't sympathize with you, because I certainly do. It's unfair that you should have to pay for the illegal behavior of someone else.

          Good luck!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297651].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Richard Van
      Originally Posted by cchipster View Post

      Tell them to get F****D!
      Well that potentially ranks well up there as the worst advice I've seen since I've been here.

      Aeriol, I'm not sure about Mr Serling but Brian Kindsvater is a very good Internet Lawyer and is around this forum regularly.

      I'm not sure what he charges etc but he may well be a good person to ask this question to, so you have a better idea where you stand.

      Either way telling them to "get f****d" is rather unlikely to make Getty realise what's happening and gracefully leave you alone. :confused:

      Classic. :rolleyes:
      Signature

      Wibble, bark, my old man's a mushroom etc...

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297469].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author aeriol
        thank you I agree you don't just tell someone to get lost.... don't want to use his language. you find your proof and ground and mount a solid response. from my reading on the net tonight i don't see that Getty does anything in a graceful manner. I will try to find Brian Kindsvater... not sure how one locates someone specific on this system but will do a search. Aeriol
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297521].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Richard Van
          Originally Posted by aeriol View Post

          thank you I agree you don't just tell someone to get lost.... don't want to use his language. you find your proof and ground and mount a solid response. from my reading on the net tonight i don't see that Getty does anything in a graceful manner. I will try to find Brian Kindsvater... not sure how one locates someone specific on this system but will do a search. Aeriol
          Here you go aeriol, he's a very nice guy too.

          Brian Kindsvater
          Signature

          Wibble, bark, my old man's a mushroom etc...

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297550].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
            Originally Posted by Richard Van View Post

            Here you go aeriol, he's a very nice guy too.

            Brian Kindsvater
            He's also an American lawyer.

            He's not a Canadian one. if the guy making the thread is Canadian, he will want to have Canadian representation.

            Although, it all depends on where they decide to pursue the case. I can get you in touch with a law office in Ottawa if you need.

            I've got a lawyer on retainer too :-).. Sometimes I need one.

            Caleb
            Signature

            Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309060].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author aeriol
              thank you a Canadian copyright lawyer would be appreciated as the U.S. one has not responded at this time. Maybe it is not his thing. Aeriol
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309631].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Richard Van
              Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

              He's also an American lawyer.

              He's not a Canadian one. if the guy making the thread is Canadian, he will want to have Canadian representation.

              Although, it all depends on where they decide to pursue the case. I can get you in touch with a law office in Ottawa if you need.

              I've got a lawyer on retainer too :-).. Sometimes I need one.

              Caleb
              Good point Caleb, I overlooked that.

              Having said that it's possible Brian has some Canadian connections he could put forward and if not, you can
              Signature

              Wibble, bark, my old man's a mushroom etc...

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3327494].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author scrofford
      Originally Posted by cchipster View Post

      Tell them to get F****D!
      Great answer! And when you can't sell products in the U.S. anymore and are still possibly sued, you can use this answer also while loosing all sorts of money!

      It's this type of attitude that gets people into trouble. I hope you are an attorney or know a good one because I am sure that someday you will need it with this attitude.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309686].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Floyd Fisher
      Originally Posted by cchipster View Post

      Tell them to get F****D!
      (disclaimer: I am not a lawyer...always seek competent legal advice from a qualified professonal)

      And this is probably the absolute worst advice given on this forum in about a month.

      Trust me, you do not want to mess with people with pockets as deep as the estate of the last J Paul Getty........unless you are 100% assured of success...and even then it's dicey because the cost is so high, it's not funny.

      The best thing to do is consult with a lawyer first and find out if you have a case. Then you need to consider if the cost it's going to run is worth the fight.

      If either or both is a no, it's really best to settle and be done with it. Sucks I know, but if you lose you could goto jail and get nailed for a 6 figure judgment. And the price of victory? Possibly bankruptcy.

      Unless you got the stomache for a bareknuckles fight to the death, it's a no win situation.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309752].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Palusko
        Jail is very unlikely. This would most definitely be characterized as "innocent infringement" by any court, so jail is out question. The bankruptcy is quite unlikely too, if I am not mistaken, this type of infringement is typically punished by around $250 per infringement. I think the highest one was $750. Plus, these are imposed if there are multiple violations and if the company actually takes it to court. But just a single violation? I would imagine they would have a hard time proving intentional violation, meaning that any judge would probably award them the very minimum.
        That being said, clearly, if you are concerned, you should contact a lawyer.
        I personally would remove the image and ignore any other correspondence. This is not an advice, by no means. It is simply what I'd do in situation like this.
        Oh, I am not a lawyer

        Originally Posted by Floyd Fisher View Post

        (disclaimer: I am not a lawyer...always seek competent legal advice from a qualified professonal)

        And this is probably the absolute worst advice given on this forum in about a month.

        Trust me, you do not want to mess with people with pockets as deep as the estate of the last J Paul Getty........unless you are 100% assured of success...and even then it's dicey because the cost is so high, it's not funny.

        The best thing to do is consult with a lawyer first and find out if you have a case. Then you need to consider if the cost it's going to run is worth the fight.

        If either or both is a no, it's really best to settle and be done with it. Sucks I know, but if you lose you could goto jail and get nailed for a 6 figure judgment. And the price of victory? Possibly bankruptcy.

        Unless you got the stomache for a bareknuckles fight to the death, it's a no win situation.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309872].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Floyd Fisher
          Originally Posted by Palusko View Post

          Jail is very unlikely. This would most definitely be characterized as "innocent infringement" by any court, so jail is out question. The bankruptcy is quite unlikely too, if I am not mistaken, this type of infringement is typically punished by around $250 per infringement. I think the highest one was $750. Plus, these are imposed if there are multiple violations and if the company actually takes it to court. But just a single violation? I would imagine they would have a hard time proving intentional violation, meaning that any judge would probably award them the very minimum.
          That being said, clearly, if you are concerned, you should contact a lawyer.
          I personally would remove the image and ignore any other correspondence. This is not an advice, by no means. It is simply what I'd do in situation like this.
          Oh, I am not a lawyer
          Wrong again.

          If you want to know what this type of case can run you, even if you are in the right, google 'Nissan vs Nissan' and see for yourself.

          Mr Nissan may have won the legal victory, but it damned near ran him into bankruptcy fighting it. That is because Nissan the company, used every means in the book to attempt to strong arm him into submission, including endless appeals after Mr Nissan won his case.

          When you're taking on a monster like getty images, you had best be prepared for a protracted legal battle. People like this know they don't have to actually win in court, all they gotta do is use their legal muscle to pummel you into submission. The don't play by ethics or rules, and they don't play nice either.

          In short, they are willing to die if it's necessary....are you?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3310061].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Palusko
            I'm sorry, are you really comparing the law suit that was about the use of well known, registered trademark name with a possible law suit about a copyright infringement of an image?
            BTW, I am not talking about taking on Getty. I am just not too convinced they would want to take this to the court. Not when only one image is involved (it would be completely different if there were multiple infringements). Obviously, Getty is trying to rake in some cash, not to protect their trademark name. And if it is about cash, then they can do the math too...Some will submit to them, others will ignore them. I think, on Getty's part, it is pretty much like fishing.

            Originally Posted by Floyd Fisher View Post

            Wrong again.

            If you want to know what this type of case can run you, even if you are in the right, google 'Nissan vs Nissan' and see for yourself.

            Mr Nissan may have won the legal victory, but it damned near ran him into bankruptcy fighting it. That is because Nissan the company, used every means in the book to attempt to strong arm him into submission, including endless appeals after Mr Nissan won his case.

            When you're taking on a monster like getty images, you had best be prepared for a protracted legal battle. People like this know they don't have to actually win in court, all they gotta do is use their legal muscle to pummel you into submission. The don't play by ethics or rules, and they don't play nice either.

            In short, they are willing to die if it's necessary....are you?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3313284].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Josh Anderson
    Well you definately should NOT do what the person who just replied to this thread suggested.

    If they say you infringed and you do not possess a license from Getty for that image then you are very likely infringing.

    Getty has a legal department that does nothing more than find infringes like your self unlawfully using their copyrighted images.

    They will not let you blow them off... in fact $600 is a more reasonable demand compared to what other companies have been demanded to pay them and you are best to remedy the issue as fast as possible... if you don't you may get hammered by them legally and end up spending much more to try and defend your self.

    You might try taking the image down immediately, telling them that you had outsourced your website to a freelancer and thought that they had used properly licensed images, and that you have removed the image in question. Or you might take the image down and not respond at all. This however does not guarantee that they do not continue to pester you or even sue you. The best advice is to consult a copyright attorney on how to handle the issue if you are unsure.

    But if you want to know whether they are serious or not you might just search google:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=Getty...gal+department

    You made the mistake that many website owners like you have made... you trusted some outsourced web designer to properly license an image without demanding that they provide you proof that they properly licensed every image used in any graphics on the site created for you before they get paid a dime for their work.

    You might be interested in this article as well that addresses how to handle it:

    http://extortionletterinfo.com/

    Consult an attorney. I am not one. Getty likely has some on retainer ;-)

    Originally Posted by aeriol View Post

    Today i received a letter austensibly from Getty Images claiming a graphics ingfringement with regards to a small image on a website i had built for me by a designer from overseas through elance several years back. They are claiming i owe them $600.oo for using their graphic without a licence. Naturally the person who built the site at the time told me he had bought the rights etc etc. So getty is in the U.S. and I am in Canada. I am finding I need a little quicky legal advice ... don't want to get into a major bill over $600.00 as to what my position in this is. Has anyone dealt with something similar, knows a lawyer who would advice. Also does anyone know if Bob Sterling the internet lawyer is still around. Appreciate any help you can offer, either lawyers name and e-mail or previous experience in such matters. Obviously I now know to ask for proof of payment for images in the future. Thanks so much. Aeriol.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296421].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author edlewis
      I echo Josh's comments.

      Take down the image and tell them you outsourced it. It may be enough for them to forgive you.

      I'm not the biggest fan of Getty, but then I'm not their ideal customer....big, multimedia conglomerates are. But they are completely in the right here as someone you hired stole an image from them without licensing it.

      Their prices are outrageous and I'm guessing many of their images never even make ONE sale, but it's their business model and it works for them. My guess is they know your image isn't licensed because they've never actually sold that image to anyone...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296483].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author aeriol
      thank you the links you offered have been most helpful... did not realize this was a problem of essentially scam type proportions and that so many thousands of people have been affected. This was very useful. Best Aeriol.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297460].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author princesschaos
    This is not directed at you, aeriol, but a majority of folks these days don't even know what copyright is. Ironically, some of the people I'm referring to even work in the (book) publishing industry.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296501].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
    Tell them to get F****D!
    What?

    If there is a wrong answer, that is it.

    This post should be a big reminder that you are responsible for what your purchase.

    All of those PLR websites for sale, do you really think all of those designers bought the extended licences for those graphics? Hellz no. Not at the prices they are selling those themes for, they wouldn't even break even. Same goes for many of those pretty PLR covers. Image licensing for multi and resale use is expensive.

    A lot of people have no problem stealing, as the OP found out for the small sum of $600.00. <--- not accusing the OP, it was the dirtbag outsource turd.
    Signature

    I'm all about that bass.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296548].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cashcow
      Originally Posted by jasonmorgan View Post

      All of those PLR websites for sale, do you really think all of those designers bought the extended licences for those graphics? Hellz no. Not at the prices they are selling those themes for, they wouldn't even break even. Same goes for many of those pretty PLR covers. Image licensing for multi and resale use is expensive.
      There is actually only 1 place that I have found which allows multiple use on the regular license (suitable for PLR) and that is Big StockPhoto. I think the multiple use is limited to like 10,000 or so uses. Most of the others do require the purchase of an extended use license and those are expensive!

      Lee
      Signature
      Gone Fishing
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309228].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author aeriol
        will check out Big Stock thnks.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309653].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author All Night Cafe
          You will get the right info. from talking to a laywer

          As far as graphics for your websites check out the
          people here on the WF. They are most helpful.

          Look in Warriors for hire. Also just ask who the
          Warriors here use and trust.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309670].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PhoebeSmellyCat
    I would follow Josh's and Ed's advice and ask a copyright attorney.
    There may be some that will do a free consultation and advise you of possible steps to take.

    Can't you contact your outsource and get the proof of license? If Getty is selling so many images (I'm assuming, of course) how do they know which ones were paid for?
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296554].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Headfirst
      Originally Posted by PhoebeSmellyCat View Post

      I would follow Josh's and Ed's advice and ask a copyright attorney.
      We're talking about $600 here. That is a lot less than it would cost to hire an attorney.

      If you deal with outsource designers you should require them to provide you with copies of the licenses for all of the images they purchased. While there are free images available, very few of them are licensed to allow commercial reuse. I would be worried any time an designer tells you they used a "free" image.

      Licensed graphics don't have to be expensive. I usually spend about ~5% of the budget on a project licensing images, there are a lot of web sites where you can purchase the image.

      Then you need to print and file your license documentation so that you can find it the next time you get a letter like this.

      If you do a lot of outsource designs you can also get a copyright infringement rider on your E&O policy. Again though, it's going to be cheaper to pay the $600, I think my Copyright policy has a $2500 deductible.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309450].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author aeriol
        good advice thanks. Today i have been working on the site and have made sure i downloaded and saved all permissions on my hard drive which is backed up online. Here in Canada lawyers give you a 30 minute free consultation. So a straight shooter should be able to sum up my position in that period of time. At which point I can make a decision.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309647].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mike Hill
    Tell them someone else built you that site and they purchased the license (assuming they did) and see what Getty Images says.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296573].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Doran Peck
    I've been through this with the same kind of insignificant image. An image which came in a software box I bought on a retail shelf. Regardless I consulted an attorney who deals with this exact issue and ghetty.

    Do not respond to their letters. Do not contact them ever.

    Simply take the picture down. You will likely get a second letter affirming you owe payment.

    Do not respond

    It will go away.

    Unless you respond to them, so don't do it
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296593].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author euhlir
    Oh yeah Getty Images is well-known for going after people using their images illegally. I had a site that relied on images and I did a lot of research on where to get images before I put up anything.

    From what I've heard, usually they'll hit you with a $2,000 fee in order to settle out of court, and you could end up paying a whole lot more if you try to take them to court.

    It's Getty images so their lawyers are going to be the best in the image copyright biz.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3296606].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author aeriol
    thank you muchly. Best Aeriol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297559].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mjarel
    Frankly speaking I have no trust on overseas developers.
    Signature
    Maria Jarel
    Brand Partnership Manager| Logoinn.com | The Art for Business
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3297649].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author aeriol
    Here's what my research has yielded so far. This is from several hours of reading dozens and dozens of online complaints maybe over a 100 and there are 100's more out there.
    Getty images makes their images on their site so expensive that no one will pay the sum of money.

    For the small image of 3 keys and little red key fob approximately 150x 15 pixels they want over $11,000.00. (the one on my site) so the thought is that if they find one of their images on your site and they know it is a copyright infraction because they have never sold their images. This is conjecture. I don't know what is true or not.

    What I did uncover is that they apparently own other image companies. It is thought they are the owners of Greedy Images and that they licence out the sale of their images to these other companies. I have no means to check this out here in Canada.

    These other image companies then sell the rights to these images to the unsuspecting consumer, IStock photos is one such company and there are many others. I Stock is commonly used by many people for their blogs and websites, they have great shots.

    Then when Getty finds that image on your site they then site you with a copyright infraction, threaten you and demand sums of money. Of course if they do in fact own the copyright then it is an infraction. The challenge is in finding out if they are telling the truth or not.

    The majority of people who totally ignored them seemed to have the best luck, although I doubt this would be good legal advice. They seemed to just go away most of the time after sending a few more letters and sicking a collection agency on you for a few months.
    It seems that calling or contacting them is the worst position to put yourself in as they are then on you like a pack of dogs. Any offer to settle is said to make them sense weakness and they salivate.

    Most people who called them got immediate offers to settle at a lower price. IT is appearing that they are principally making their money threatening small businesses and small people running little websites in the hope they will settle for lumps of cash. $600 is nothing, some of the amounts on the web for one or two tiny images are ranging to demands of up to $2000.00.

    Of course you can ask them for proof that they own the copyright and did so at the time you bought the image. For me that was back in January 2005. I have the bill from Elance.com where I hired my designer who supplied the images as part of the contract.
    Many of the complainants say that they bought the images legally. I doubt they are all liars, a few may be.

    Some even found them on legitimate FREE image web sites. Truth is you can get a free image and then at a later date this person can register with Getty.

    They refuse to supply you with their copyright proof and threaten you with law suit. Of course then they start the legal guns rolling..... They run up a huge legal bill on you immediately so that you will settle out of court without further adieu.

    One small business in England refused to back down on them out of principal. The settlement was almost 30,000 British pounds or almost $45,000 U.S. $ . The actual settlement portion was about $4500.00 and the rest was legal fees. So they of course have their own in house legal and this is a money maker for them.

    Needless to say if this information is correct & it can't all be lies this is a very nasty but Legal Scam. No one ultimately stands up to them due to their international status and their billions of dollars that they are worth.

    The bottom line I gather is to say very little to Getty, see what they do and make a quick final settlement if necessary before they sue you. It is a game of chicken.

    Going forward it is advisable to keep a file in your pictures folder called Website images.
    Keep a permanent record of the .jpg. along with a word document clearly giving the permissions which are usually under the image with dates etc. on the free websites.

    Best to stay away from all paid image sites as Getty may in fact own the copyright.

    Lastly get your handy dandy little digi cam out and go snap your own shots. That's what I did for the rebuild on my latest sites.

    This cuts out the photographers from their income which is not good, however they must at some level be buying into this unless Getty is not giving them part of the settlement fees they are collecting. Who knows.

    But I won't be buying anymore images online anymore.

    Anyway this is what I have ascertained after several hours of reading and research. You also have to read between the lines as some people are not particularily logical or think that because they didn't know it doesn't count.

    If i get anymore insights I will post here. Thanks for all your help. Aeriol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3302360].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Philarmon
    Well, i have got an email like that once - it was about a website that was built upon a (commercial) website tempalte from a VERY respectable template website that always using only royalty free images to avoid copyright problems.

    Nevertheless i have got an email from the law firm stating that i owe them several thousands and my first born child. I can not remember if it was Getty or one of the other large image stock websites. Anyways since the niche was pretty targeted i did a search on their database and clicked through all 20 pages of the images - none of the images on my site showed up.

    I have just ignored the email since im overseas and i felt that i was right (which is not the best thing to do probably).

    Anyways i think that it is impossible for them to prove that i broke THEIR copyrights unless they owe exclusive rights to the images. But photographers submit the images to a lot of sites mostly so this is rarely the case.

    However, please dont take it as a legal advice and do not send or email ANYTHING back to them - especially not the settlement templates they send to you - without a proper legal consultation.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309033].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
    I do not know why anyone would ever purchase images from getty in the first place, not only are their images not that great, but they are waaaay overpriced.....
    Signature
    Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309167].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author aeriol
      i agree, i don't believe this image was purchased from getty, it was obtained from elsewhere. but now it is registered with Getty or so they claim.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309637].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DPWeb
    Please keep us updated. I am so freaking sick and tired of seeing people get scammed online. Why can't people just be honest? Why would anyone feel good about wrongfully charging others? I can't stand that.

    I wish there was something people could do against stupid stuff like this. If it is their image, and your designer did take it without proper permission, they have a case, but it all does sound a little shady to me.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309663].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Palusko
    I wonder though - what is the license documentation in these cases? I mean, I often use 123rf for stock photos. I deposit money into the account, and then, simply download the image I want and the cost is automatically taken from my credit. There really is no TOS, License or anything else, for that matter.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3309673].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author aeriol
    Seems i have started quite a storm of answers with this and everyone has lots of opinions. It is most interesting.I will be looking for a copyright lawyer here in Toronto just to learn my rights or the lack of them. I won't be mounting a fight.... not worth the bother...or the cost... they have more money than I do. will then make a decision how to act. However, I think this is a good venue and good feed as people learn more about how this Getty Images company is conducting themselves in general and why they need to be avoided like the plague and also any other image companies that they may secretly own and thereby be tricking people with. thanks for all the great responses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3312089].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
      Originally Posted by aeriol View Post

      Seems i have started quite a storm of answers with this and everyone has lots of opinions. It is most interesting.I will be looking for a copyright lawyer here in Toronto just to learn my rights or the lack of them. I won't be mounting a fight.... not worth the bother...or the cost... they have more money than I do. will then make a decision how to act. However, I think this is a good venue and good feed as people learn more about how this Getty Images company is conducting themselves in general and why they need to be avoided like the plague and also any other image companies that they may secretly own and thereby be tricking people with. thanks for all the great responses.
      They haven't filed papers yet have they -- and if they do, they might file in America.... Ask your lawyer if you need to fight it there anyway, because I highly doubt they will fight it in Canada...
      Signature

      Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3327467].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author aeriol
    P.S. before this I had never heard of Getty Images.... I am sure many others are in the same boat... .beware the internet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3312093].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author robbby
      I know a few who have been caught out by this so no your not the only one
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3312198].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jay Moreno
    noticed this thread as a client of mine went through a similar thing but they where faced with a much higher bill

    i did some research and i believe there is an Israel based company that has proprietary software that scans the web specifically for images both raw and manipulated from gettys vast library, reason being they get a hefty commission from every image they find and fulfill a claim.

    My client had an attorney deal with the claim and ended up paying around 25% of the initial bill plus of course attorney fees!

    From all the documentation i saw both the manipulated images that where used and the getty images they said where stolen and they did match up.

    From my understanding in the initial claim process they will send you the getty image ID of the original images that are being used on your site.

    This happened over a year ago now - although $600 may not be a lot of money to Getty 10,000 copyright claims a year is a cool $6,000,000 which i am sure they would rather have in their pocket from people who dont put up a fight and just pay it... not to mention i am sure those Israeli guys would get a nice chunk of that - just sayin'!

    @OP good luck whichever way you decide to take this claim
    Signature
    Sorry, I am too busy helping people to think of a cool signature!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3326072].message }}

Trending Topics