AUTOBLOGGING! How? Good or Bad? Pros Cons?

25 replies
Hello,

Is autobloging a good choice for getting some filling content on a review site and then filling in more of the content with your own words effective?

what are the pros and cons for doing it?

And what programs are the best free ones to start with if any out there?

Thanks,
#autoblogging #bad #cons #good #pros
  • Profile picture of the author empoweredh
    I would advise against it. It worked in the past, but since Google's latest algo changes, it has made sites that scrape articles from other sites drop massively in the rankings. I would advise going to elance and having someone right you original articles for $5 a pop. Worth it in the long run. if you did want to check out autoblog software, I would check out WPRobot.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525750].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dotlinkmedia
    I still think autoblogging with other people taking the article was a disgrace.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525758].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525779].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
      Originally Posted by empoweredh View Post

      I would advise against it. It worked in the past, but since Google's latest algo changes, it has made sites that scrape articles from other sites drop massively in the rankings. I would advise going to elance and having someone right you original articles for $5 a pop. Worth it in the long run. if you did want to check out autoblog software, I would check out WPRobot.
      No... it hasn't. All the autoblogs I have, and other people posting on this forum, have noticed a large increase in ranking and traffic

      Originally Posted by dotlinkmedia View Post

      I still think autoblogging with other people taking the article was a disgrace.
      What about news syndication? Is that a disgrace? Maybe it is a matter of ethics here, but ethics don't make mortgage payments, or power bills. People might think it is wrong, but that is okay, I will continue using autoblogs and keep the money from it!

      Originally Posted by WillR View Post

      Bad.
      Pros: None.
      Cons: Everything
      I used to think autoblogs were horrible because it takes 20 minutes to install a template, and then the site is basically complete. However, it works.
      Pros - not having to constantly maintain your website, increased traffic, increased ranking, increased money and efficiency.
      Cons - until google actually makes an algo change that effects autoblogs, there are no cons.


      Lets get this straight guys, the last algo change, had no effect over duplicate content, quality content, or anything of the sort. The effect it had was about RELEVANT content. Autoblogs are niche related, and have relevant content.

      What does google see as relevant content? Content that has links behind it. EZA took a hit because a lot of the articles had no juice pointed to them. I believe the algo change, took away a certain amount of home page PR juice, being trickled down throughout the site. That is it, that is all.

      The articles that were ranking before the algo change, were ranking mostly due to the authority of the site. The articles that were ranking after the change, was due to the amount of links behind the article, getting its own juice outside the domain.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525820].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author WillR
        Originally Posted by iAmNameLess View Post

        Cons - until google actually makes an algo change that effects autoblogs, there are no cons.
        That's the biggest 'CON' of all. It's only a matter of time. I don't want to build my long-term business around tactics that I can 'get away with' at the moment. That is not a way to build a sustainable business.

        It's funny. People will continue to build auto-blogs but the day the search engines wipe them out you will all be on the forum complaining about your traffic going to zero. It's happened before and it will happen again.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525906].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
          Originally Posted by WillR View Post

          That's the biggest 'CON' of all. It's only a matter of time. I don't want to build my long-term business around tactics that I can 'get away with' at the moment. That is not a way to build a sustainable business.

          It's funny. People will continue to build auto-blogs but the day the search engines wipe them out you will all be on the forum complaining about your traffic going to zero. It's happened before and it will happen again.
          I don't think so Will.... No matter WHAT you do in internet marketing you will have to make changes. If you can't deal with making changes, you aren't a good fit in IM.

          Autoblogs, adsense, amazon, clickback, it is all supplemental, it isn't my main source of income.

          IF google ever does something about autoblogs, it is going to backfire... autoblogs will take content right away, then it is a race to see who gets indexed first. So what you're suggesting, is that google will make an update, that will probably effect original content too. LOL.

          I dunno, do what you want, but I'm going to do whatever makes me money. If all my autoblogs died tomorrow, I would be perfectly okay.

          Regardless of your decision, it would be foolish to put all your eggs in one basket.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525961].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author WillR
            Originally Posted by iAmNameLess View Post

            IF google ever does something about autoblogs, it is going to backfire... autoblogs will take content right away, then it is a race to see who gets indexed first.
            All it would be taking away is content that can already be found elsewhere. An auto-blog in the true sense of the word is a blog that automatically pulls in and publishes information that is already available on the Internet.

            Originally Posted by mikesan View Post

            But building blogs that use plugins to grab content automatically + adding your own unique content/coments is good imho.
            Exactly.

            Originally Posted by iAmNameLess View Post

            Well, looks like I am in the minority here... that is okay, you can think autoblogs are bad, I'll continue doing what makes me money, until it stops, then I'll switch it up.
            No one said you were not making money. All I said was I would much rather spend a tiny little extra effort and a tiny bit of money and have my own unique content created rather than just using content that is already available elsewhere.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526164].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
          Originally Posted by WillR View Post

          People will continue to build auto-blogs but the day the search engines wipe them out you will all be on the forum complaining about your traffic going to zero.
          Just a quick note.

          I have asked people that I knew ran sites within a particular niche, whether they could answer some questions about that niche.

          And they have manually directed me to autoblogs which were full of relevant, well-written content that answered my questions very well.

          Autoblogs like that will NEVER have their traffic drop to zero because of an algo change at Google, because - auto or not - they are exactly what Google knows people really want to see in their search results.

          Whenever someone says "autoblog," everyone gets this image in their head of a blog that has no real editorial oversight or focused direction, and just scrapes articles at random from a massive list of unrelated sites that don't allow reuse of their content.

          The reality, for most people who actually MAKE MONEY with autoblogs, is that every article is manually approved by a human being, the sources are informed and have given consent (sometimes even being compensated), and the subject of the site is carefully selected and retained.

          It is, in short, an authority site constructed with permission from the best content of other authority sites.

          And it makes the average manually-maintained authority site look like dog meat.
          Signature
          "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526121].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author WillR
            Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

            Whenever someone says "autoblog," everyone gets this image in their head of a blog that has no real editorial oversight or focused direction, and just scrapes articles at random from a massive list of unrelated sites that don't allow reuse of their content.
            Actually, that's exactly what I was thinking. When I hear the word auto-blog I am talking about those set and forget scripts people load on to their server. Isn't that what an auto-blog is in the true sense of the word?

            Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

            The reality, for most people who actually MAKE MONEY with autoblogs, is that every article is manually approved by a human being, the sources are informed and have given consent (sometimes even being compensated), and the subject of the site is carefully selected and retained.
            The blogs you are talking about I would not refer to as an auto-blog. However EZA was a site that manually approves each article and they certainly took a hit?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526147].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
              Originally Posted by WillR View Post

              The blogs you are talking about I would not refer to as an auto-blog. However EZA was a site that manually approves each article and they certainly took a hit?
              They did, and it wasn't due to duplicate content or lack of unique content, it was due to lack of RELEVANT content. Google sees relevant content as, something of use, something that gets backlinks to. The 25% of articles still ranking on EZA, are ranking because of the juice being pointed to it, outside of the EZA domain.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526168].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
              Originally Posted by WillR View Post

              Isn't that what an auto-blog is in the true sense of the word?
              That depends on whom you ask.

              If you ask people who hate autoblogs, never build them, and think they should be banned from the internet... yeah, that's what they call the true sense of the word.

              But if I wanted to know the true definition of "autoblog," I'd go ask someone who makes his living on autoblogs.

              So when people in the former group come in here ranting and raving and trying to argue with the latter group, I sort of have to scratch my head and wonder WTF they are thinking.

              I swear, it is like a high school student arguing with a doctor about what "true" medical practice is. I'm sure that high school student is very smart and cares very much about the subject, but when you come right down to it, he's just not qualified to have an opinion on it. He doesn't have the training. He doesn't have the experience. And he sure as hell doesn't use his opinions to make a living.
              Signature
              "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526586].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author MarketingVet09
                To Cdarklock, not to disagree that autoblogs can be profitable or anything like that, but just to let you know the perspective I personally had with what I was saying:


                Would you agree that shortcuts could be detrimental to an Internet Marketers long term knowledge set and success?

                Basically what I'm saying is, I feel it teaches the wrong habits.

                Like, someone could come right now and ask can they make money on Craigslist... Sure they can.. But it's not something I would suggest because them going straight to the shortcut is going to hurt there overall skill set in the long run.

                Just as an example to the original poster: People preach about Your Email List, building a great relationship, giving quality etc, and things like that...

                Creating an autoblog (a lazy short cut) does not promote these types of habits... An autoblog to me is like taking some HCG diet drops or getting Gastric bypass surgery because you're too lazy to work at it on your own.. Sure you can get a quick fix, but in the long run, doing it naturally would have taught some principles that you'll NEVER get back once you go the shortcut route...

                Unless of course you hit the reset button 5 years later like I did...

                Writing articles with proper keywords (seo), learning to provide genuine and quality content (building a list / relationships), hiring someone to write the articles for you (dabbling in outsourcing), just simply hard work (learning patience) ... I could go on...

                Taking a short cut, in the long run, is going to hurt you, IMO...

                Again, this is just coming from someone who has been there and done that.

                I wish to god I could rewind 5 years, never made that 45k the lazy way, actually paid attention when people said "the money is in the list", and used some patience and learned things from the ground up...

                So, to each its own. But this is my perspective on it. If you want to Master Internet marketing and learn the ins and outs from all angles, it's going to take making some mistakes and time to get there...

                Last thing I'll say, as it's 4am and I'm rambling because I'm bored...

                If you wanted to be a doctor, would you take your most important tests with a cheat sheet? I mean sure you'll make some money for a little while, but how long before it catches up with you? Where as if you had just studied, aced the tests the right way, your foundation will be rock solid and you'll never have anything to worry about, and actually make way more money in the long run because you can continue to expand and improve on the core fundamentals that you learned in the beginning?

                All that being said, even if you just want to make some quick money and then really learn things and get your hands dirty later on, I'd go with CPA over Autoblogs any day...

                So either way autoblogs is a waste of time IMO.

                Good luck
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526731].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author MarketingVet09
                  Oh, and Clark I'm actually just now reading your last message. Did you scale up on autoblogs after you already knew how everything works as far as IM?

                  It seems the thread starter doesn't know too much, as he's asking this question. Of course if you exploded your autoblog empire after knowing what you're doing, that's different, and I'd never try to discount anything you're saying as you have more experience than me.

                  Every situation is different.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526748].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author para10
                    I've tried auto blogging software (ABS) and to be honest, the benefits weren't all there.

                    One thing to understand about them, is you need to create a lot of sites to actually see money come in (think 50 websites). Although money will start coming in, you won't learn!

                    In order to start making decent money in affiliate marketing, you need to fully understand the process. With ABS you skip a lot of the work and losing the opportunity to learn.

                    My advice, don't do it, and do it yourself. You'll create much more unique sites, and over time you'll learn how the system works.

                    Good luck!
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526768].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Rsberg
                  I know you didn't address me with your post but I'm going to chime in anyway...


                  Originally Posted by Jusumax View Post

                  Would you agree that shortcuts could be detrimental to an Internet Marketers long term knowledge set and success?


                  Of course it could if you don't know what you are doing. However, if you are skilled and have experience in the area you are "short cutting" and know what you're doing then I would have to say that depends on the individual and the steps taken to avoid long term harm.


                  Originally Posted by Jusumax View Post


                  Creating an autoblog (a lazy short cut) does not promote these types of habits... An autoblog to me is like taking some HCG diet drops or getting Gastric bypass surgery because you're too lazy to work at it on your own.. Sure you can get a quick fix, but in the long run, doing it naturally would have taught some principles that you'll NEVER get back once you go the shortcut route...


                  I think you might be confusing what most people view as autoblogging (especially those that failed at it) to what those of us today are doing to succeed at it.

                  I can tell you one thing for sure...

                  The way I autoblog doesn't involve many "short cuts"!

                  Sure, much of it is automated but I challenge anyone who is being honest to say that they don't use any kind of automation in their IM business...especially those that are successful in IM.

                  Originally Posted by Jusumax View Post


                  Writing articles with proper keywords (seo), learning to provide genuine and quality content (building a list / relationships), hiring someone to write the articles for you (dabbling in outsourcing), just simply hard work (learning patience) ... I could go on...


                  You just described what many of us do with our autoblogs today...

                  Originally Posted by Jusumax View Post


                  Again, this is just coming from someone who has been there and done that.

                  I wish to god I could rewind 5 years, never made that 45k the lazy way, actually paid attention when people said "the money is in the list", and used some patience and learned things from the ground up...


                  So what you're basically saying is that you would have never autoblogged had you known then what you know now...

                  If so, that's fine for you...as you say..."to each its own".


                  Originally Posted by Jusumax View Post


                  If you wanted to be a doctor, would you take your most important tests with a cheat sheet? I mean sure you'll make some money for a little while, but how long before it catches up with you? Where as if you had just studied, aced the tests the right way, your foundation will be rock solid and you'll never have anything to worry about, and actually make way more money in the long run because you can continue to expand and improve on the core fundamentals that you learned in the beginning?


                  Why is it that those who are against autoblogging always equate it to cheating or stealing?

                  If the syndicated content that we use on our autoblogs is allowed to be used (meaning form a source that authorizes this)...then how is that cheating or steeling?

                  I'm sorry but I don't feel it is either of these, at least not the way I do it. I also don't feel that using automation hurts my "core fundamentals" at all.


                  Originally Posted by Jusumax View Post

                  So either way autoblogs is a waste of time IMO.


                  Like you said.... "IMO"

                  All of us have one and mine doesn't agree with yours.

                  The thing I think you are missing is that no one is saying to make any single form of IM (autoblogging included) your main source of income. I could probably quit my "regular" job and work entirely with IM if I wanted to but I like my job and I make great money at it in an economy that is terrible...

                  My point is that autoblogging isn't even close to my only source of income and it certainly isn't my only approach with IM, it is however one of my favorite approaches.

                  Everyone is entitled to their opinion and yours is just fine for you but I don't know that it's fair to condemn an entire method or approach simply because you personally don't like it or think that there are better methods to focus on.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526818].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Rsberg
            Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

            Just a quick note.

            I have asked people that I knew ran sites within a particular niche, whether they could answer some questions about that niche.

            And they have manually directed me to autoblogs which were full of relevant, well-written content that answered my questions very well.

            Autoblogs like that will NEVER have their traffic drop to zero because of an algo change at Google, because - auto or not - they are exactly what Google knows people really want to see in their search results.

            Whenever someone says "autoblog," everyone gets this image in their head of a blog that has no real editorial oversight or focused direction, and just scrapes articles at random from a massive list of unrelated sites that don't allow reuse of their content.

            The reality, for most people who actually MAKE MONEY with autoblogs, is that every article is manually approved by a human being, the sources are informed and have given consent (sometimes even being compensated), and the subject of the site is carefully selected and retained.

            It is, in short, an authority site constructed with permission from the best content of other authority sites.

            And it makes the average manually-maintained authority site look like dog meat.
            This is dead on as far as I am concerned!

            I do quite well with my autoblogs and Caliban and I have spoken a few times about that and the one thing I have consistantly told him (and everyone else for that matter) is that autoblogs can add value to the net for the typical searcher if you build quality sites.

            As Caliban stated (and iAmNameLess as well), if you are adding content to the autoblog that is well written, related and unique then you are adding value...period!

            Would I agree that most "autoblogs" are crap...probably, at least what most would consider an autoblog but I honestly believe that definition is changing and there will come a time when people will let go of the old understanding of what an autoblog is and come to realize that they aren't what they used to be.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526437].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author andreasnrb
            Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

            The reality, for most people who actually MAKE MONEY with autoblogs, is that every article is manually approved by a human being, the sources are informed and have given consent (sometimes even being compensated), and the subject of the site is carefully selected and retained.

            It is, in short, an authority site constructed with permission from the best content of other authority sites.

            And it makes the average manually-maintained authority site look like dog meat.
            Well is that really the general definition of an autoblog? The whole point of autoblog is that its automatic. What your talking about is a prereview setup that requires manual labor. Theres nothing automatic about it except for getting various posts the posting etc is done by manual labor.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526808].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SeanSupplee
    The internet's full of repeated crap don't add to it
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525833].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MarketingVet09
    Listen to Will....

    Or, you can take it from me, someone who's been on both sides of the fence...


    You can take 2 paths in internet marketing:

    The quick Fix and make some fast money


    Or a long term, real business and career...


    I made $45,000 in 5 months 5 years ago, and didn't know crap about building an email list...

    Eventually, my traffic ran out, I lost it all...


    Here I am 5 years later, in the last 5 months have really, truly learned what it means to be an internet marketer...

    I could write a 100 page book on this, or you can take it or leave it from this short paragraph.

    The choice is yours.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525941].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seoexpertzach
    Auto Blogging is if you want to make like $5 a month. If you want to make a blog put original content on it so that way Google will enjoy indexing every page and post on your website!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3525972].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Rsberg
      Originally Posted by seoexpertzach View Post

      Auto Blogging is if you want to make like $5 a month. If you want to make a blog put original content on it so that way Google will enjoy indexing every page and post on your website!
      $5 a month isn't even close...least not for those of us who have found success with it and I would venture to say that for those that have...Google indexes them just fine
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526442].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mikesan
    Complete autoblogs are bad in so many ways. The biggest being that you're not really offering anything of value to the user. Yes, it's possible they might get some useful bits of information on an autoblog but chances are that's not the case.

    That said, I know a "hybrid" type setup where you have an autoblog + unique content or commentary could be useful for your visitors while also being profitable.

    I guess that goes along the lines as the "curation" news sites being touted by many IMers recently. Most notably Keith Baxter. I've followed him closesly throughout the years and his stuff is always top notch. Not sure if he's still selling is "Sindicator" course but if he is, I'd recommend checking it out.

    So bottomline is autoblogs are bad. But building blogs that use plugins to grab content automatically + adding your own unique content/coments is good imho.
    Signature

    Confused about starting an online business? Not sure what's out there and what works? Visit:
    onlinebusiness.com to learn more today.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526086].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
    Well, looks like I am in the minority here... that is okay, you can think autoblogs are bad, I'll continue doing what makes me money, until it stops, then I'll switch it up.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526137].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author theantihype
    As with EVERYTHING in internet marketing (and life, really) -- you get what you put in.

    If you think you can fire and forget... you will quickly learn that you will never hit your target.

    +1 that pure auto-blogging is counter-productive
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3526156].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Doktus
    Hi warriors,

    I have read lot of treads about autoblogging here at WF.
    A lot of opinions, cons and pros about auto blogs.

    Just my thoughts and questions about unique content and what you understand under term “unique content”.

    An example:
    First IMer, who is running auto blog about “Gardening”, he/she collects information (using automation – scripts, plugins etc.) about gardening, relevant information, in one place and provides value to his/her readers.

    So, he/she uses duplicate content as lots of people think here. However, in my opinion, if he/she is giving a value to reader then this duplicate content is only for SE not for readers. Of course he/she should work ethically (not changing content, giving a credit to author etc.).

    Second IMer, who is running authority blog on “Gardening”, he/she writes unique content in his/her blog (or hire some) and provide value to readers.



    Now is my first question: how this unique content was written?



    I very doubt that second IMer has grown say “ficus bonsai” and just wrote how he/she take care for his/her ficus bonsai,but he/she did research and in most case just rewrote some article by his/her words or even combined info from 2-3 articles about how to care for ficus bonsai. Am I wrong?



    Next question: is this content unique for readers (if I read the same info somewhere else just written with different words and sentences)?

    I’m pretty sure that this content is unique for SE.

    That my thoughts.And my questions.


    I'm ready for criticisms but don't fight me LOL



    Thanks for patience and apologize for my English



    Vadim
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3528162].message }}

Trending Topics