Dear Mr Guru, I just unsubscribed from your list, here's why...

61 replies
[The actual names, dates, and events have been changed to protect the parties involved]


Dear Mr. Guru,

I have been on your list since I met you at an event. I didn't just 'see' you, we actually had a lengthy conversation. I was impressed that you stoically stood your ground when you spoke of promoting JV's to your list, vehemently stating that you only engaged in JV's with people who knew your instant messenger ID.

After speaking with you at that time, I felt that you were someone I wanted to continue to listen to, so I signed up to your list. I even sent old school style correspondence to you (snail mail greeting card) to show my appreciation for the nuggets you gave me during our conversation. I never received so much as an email acknowledgement from you that you received said correspondence.

Now, over the course of x months, I have gotten emails from you almost every single day promoting someone else's product through a JV offer. Not only do I have no confidence whatsoever that you aren't promoting every single product that will bring you commissions regardless of any 'personal relationship,' I have also looked at many of the things you are pitching and I can tell you that I think they are utter garbage and I think you out and out lied to your audience regarding who you would and would not do a JV with.

You have just lost me as a subscriber and a customer, but fortunately for me, your emails were all pitches anyway, and there was nothing to be learned from them. If you find yourself losing other subscribers, take heed of my note. This is most likely your cause.

Sincerely,
Marcus Ramirez

*** I would like to note that this is something I actually did quite a while ago, but didn't post at the time. I am discovering more and more of this behavior from the 'guru's and I am unsubscribing from more and more lists. Every time I hit that unsubscribe button, I am reminded of the reason I started unsubscribing and I just wanted to get this off my chest once and for all. Thanks for listening... uh... reading...

Warmest Holiday Wishes,
Marcus.

P.S. Please keep this post in mind when building or mailing to your list. If you go down this road of marketing, you will guarantee yourself at least this one lost prospect.
#dear #guru #list #unsubscribed
  • Profile picture of the author novelco
    I hear you. That's a shame that is how you've been dealt with. It's too bad that even the "gurus" forget about the customer service side of things as well.
    Signature

    Justin McGill
    Founder of LeadFuze - Helping digital marketing agencies, sales people, and startup founders generate leads on autopilot.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369638].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom B
      Banned
      Maybe they filtered you out which isn't a bad thing.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369690].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author AgileHosting
      Originally Posted by novelco View Post

      It's too bad that even the "gurus" forget about the customer service side of things as well.
      I also think it is as if the gurus have become too separated from the people. I mean, the real, warm-blooded, ordinary, eccentric individuals we buyers all are. It is as if there is an emotional wall, or they 'unplug' from people after the face-to-face. It's as if they remove their personal investment, and we people become just a mass of monetary statistics to them.

      :confused:

      I don't know, but I've unsubbed from a number of guru lists for this exact reason. I'm not a lemming, I'm not a number, I have feelings and I do expect authenticity from the person I subscribe to.

      Honestly I've been getting a LOT more, higher quality material from the "little guys" and from Experts, I'll call them who aren't Pitch Kings. People like:

      That's a lot of links, I know and dig around in their websites, because many of them run outstanding free email newsletters, and run multiple websites about different but related topics.

      I have kept my subscriptions live with a couple of Pike Kings, just to keep the perspective of How To Annoy Your Subscribers alive in my head. I always have a litmus I can hold my stuff up against, and ask, 'Have I sold out like this guy?' LOL

      Originally Posted by ExRat

      They have identified something that many others may have missed.

      Short term business plans suit short term attention spans. Disposable, replaceable, cheaply aquired customers, on a conveyor belt. Churn and burn.


      Beautifully said, ExRat. And very true!! I suspect that "back-when," when the majority of these Mr Gurus were little guys, that they were more into relationship building and providing quality content in order to build their business. But now that they are at Mr Guru status, that very Guru status has caused their business model to change. They now pitch what helped them get where they are, so that they could shift their focus to the now more cost-effective churn-and-burn numbers game.

      As for whether it's the right thing to do? -- I think that is a question that each of us has to ask and answer for ourselves. There's no one set answer to that, there's only the right answer for ourselves.

      Bailey
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370023].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author George Wright
    Marcus,

    What do you want to see in the emails from people who's lists you join.

    I have a feeling (and I do this with my very small list) that each email should have a "gem" that they would otherwise not get, a tip a method a free piece of software etc.

    Another question, My particular way to email does not use the "Dear [first name] feature. All of my emails start out "Hi All" "Dear Members." If the content is at least good and at best GREAT does the Hi All greeting offend?

    Thanks for starting this thread. I think it can be useful.

    George Wright
    Signature
    "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369722].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Corwinnx
      George,

      That IS exactly what I want from my emails. A tip. A system. A Strategy. A Tool. A Technology.

      I couldn't really care less how I'm addressed, well.. for the most part... I'm definitely no fan of 'insult marketing,' and don't want to be addressed as 'Dear Loser' but that's a whole other tangent that I'm not going off on tonight.

      I dont' mind being 'pitched' either. But the two things that bothered me about this particular guru were

      One: The holier-than-thou 'facade' he put on that he only did JV's with people on his messenger, but then I got daily messages promoting the product of any Tom, Dick and Harry in the IM game, (most of which were crap anyway) ...

      Two: and none of which 'offered' anything. No tip, no system, no strategy, no technology. Just the basic, "this is so hot I want my list to know about it before anyone else"....

      All that being said, the guru who will impress me is the one who starts his list off by training them in the basics of business, before trying to teach them how to exploit a method without a model, and without the foundational knowledge of the 'infrastructure' that supports a business.

      Oh wait, that's my calling card isn't it? I guess I better get back to work on that...

      now where I am going to get that list to give all these 'gems' and 'nuggets' to?

      -Marcus
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369771].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Lockwood
    I'm sure Mr Guru is worried now that he's down to 49,999 subscribers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369782].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ExRat
      Hi Corwinnx,

      I was a buyer
      Therefore, the system they used worked. They have a high prospect>customer>unsubscriber turnover business plan, that is low maintenance as a whole. It worked.

      It may have left you with a bad taste (understandably).

      But if your conclusion is -

      Please keep this post in mind when building or mailing to your list. If you go down this road of marketing, you will guarantee yourself at least this one lost prospect.
      ...then I don't think you have extracted the maximum from this experience. In fact, I think you're missing the point.

      Perhaps they knew right from the start that this would happen. Perhaps they make X amount of sales before each customer gets to the point that you now have. Perhaps you are still buying from others who's lists and products they pushed you towards. Perhaps they own those lists and use a different, more long term style of marketing on you, under a different persona. Perhaps they have strategic alliances with a group of marketers, who all use slightly different approaches in order that eventually, you will stick with one of them for the long term because their style does not repulse you.

      To extract more from this, understand that they have done their homework and understand the market very well, and devised a system to profit from it that works.

      That business model may not be everyone's cup of tea, but my point is - if there are lessons flying around, particularly ones that have cost you to learn - take maximum value from them - even if it's not the lesson that you thought you were paying for.

      Just because someone's business plan appears to not be based on long term customer relationships does not automatically mean that it is a poor business plan.

      They have identified something that many others may have missed.

      Short term business plans suit short term attention spans. Disposable, replaceable, cheaply aquired customers, on a conveyor belt. Churn and burn.

      I have been on your list since I met you at an event
      They will tell you that the only way to build proper business relationships is to attend events and meet people in person.

      What they don't tell you is that by doing so, you simply qualify yourself (via your commitment and effort) as their most highly targeted prospect, ideal for this type of marketing.
      Signature


      Roger Davis

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369904].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Aussie777
      Hi Marcus.

      I'm with you mate.

      I EXPECT to be sold to, HOWEVER, when I receive an email nearly every day promoting anything and everything I tend to get a bit jack of it.

      Time is our biggest asset. Yes, we have to spend our precious time to read these emails.

      I give everyone a fair chance. If they want to promote and give nothing in return well, astalavista baby!!!

      Cheers Mate.

      Have a great New Year.

      Brett.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369938].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author James Schramko
      Originally Posted by Chris Lockwood View Post

      I'm sure Mr Guru is worried now that he's down to 49,999 subscribers.
      There are plenty of worried 'old schoolers' otherwise they would not be scrambling for Twitter with such tail between the legs desperation.

      When they had 500,000 people on the list they got arrogant. It is a different story when they are now down to a 1 - 5% open rate on a fraction of that number.....

      How else can small marketers bludgeon them in affiliate standings from mega launches unless their lists are worn out?

      The wild west days are over and smart marketers will be giving more than taking.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370035].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
        Originally Posted by James Schramko View Post

        There are plenty of worried 'old schoolers' otherwise they would not be scrambling for Twitter with such tail between the legs desperation.

        When they had 500,000 people on the list they got arrogant. It is a different story when they are now down to a 1 - 5% open rate on a fraction of that number.....

        How else can small marketers bludgeon them in affiliate standings from mega launches unless their lists are worn out?

        The wild west days are over and smart marketers will be giving more than taking.




        I call it Caveman syndrome.. "older" marketers are SO obvious, trying to club their prospects over the head in desperation...

        As my old Dad used to say... it's NOT big, and it certainly isn't clever (read, smart).

        Either way it doesn't bother me.. I know I can cause a fuss in the launch scene and I'm fresh in this niche...

        YOU rock James.. spot on dude..

        Peace

        Jay
        Signature

        Bare Murkage.........

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370090].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author James Schramko
          Originally Posted by JayXtreme View Post





          I call it Caveman syndrome.. "older" marketers are SO obvious, trying to club their prospects over the head in desperation...

          As my old Dad used to say... it's NOT big, and it certainly isn't clever (read, smart).

          Either way it doesn't bother me.. I know I can cause a fuss in the launch scene and I'm fresh in this niche...

          YOU rock James.. spot on dude..

          Peace

          Jay

          I never did understand why buyers were accepting the B.S sales and bullying tactics when I started online however I realize this was probably due to two reasons:

          1) The US has a different mix of sales:education acceptance than Aus (or UK?)

          2) The amount of people arriving into IM was enough to permit churn and burn and they had not yet been burnt twice as it was new.

          Why is it changing?

          I think this:

          1) Social media is allowing buyers to communicate better and expect a two way relationship

          2) Buyers are hurting financially and they won't stand being burnt three times in a row. They are much smarter than some cavemen give them credit.


          2009 is a landscape of opportunity for people willing to give value and SERVE clients.

          Hail the new era of Value based marketing with integrity!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370096].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author JayXtreme
            Originally Posted by James Schramko View Post

            1) Social media is allowing buyers to communicate better and expect a two way relationship

            2) Buyers are hurting financially and they won't stand being burnt three times in a row. They are much smarter than some cavemen give them credit.
            I think these two points that James makes above are VERY important in the way internet marketing is growing each day..

            Not only are the lines of communication between customer and "marketer" more open, but ALSO the connection between ANY customers.. in a customer to customer setting are more open than ever before.

            Discussion forums, social media, open discussions on blogs, all allow for people to really get a wide variety of opinions, thoughts, facts, stats and figures.. and it allows people to gather this information quicker than was ever possible before.

            This helps customers to "rally" together.. not so much in terms of grouping, but if a general consensus is met about a particular standard, then that bar has to raise in order for things to move and progress in a socially accepted fashion.

            Which things have to do in order for marketers to still profit.

            If word gets round that "GURU XYZ" is doing something something not too customer friendly, you can bet your bottom dollar that his next launch will suffer some and maybe more. This kind of information sharing is SO much faster and smoother now...so word would spread real quick

            Peace

            Jay
            Signature

            Bare Murkage.........

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370121].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author MaskedMarketer
              Originally Posted by James Schramko View Post

              There are plenty of worried 'old schoolers' otherwise they would not be scrambling for Twitter with such tail between the legs desperation.

              When they had 500,000 people on the list they got arrogant. It is a different story when they are now down to a 1 - 5% open rate on a fraction of that number.....
              Good call James. I never understood why people are so obsessed with huge lists. Attracting leads is one thing and converting them is another.

              Need to know how to excel at both.

              This reminds me of something Kevin Hogan said about the "top" internet guys. He said something about his list size being so small compared to the top internet guys, but when you do the math and see how much more he makes "per" subscriber, he'll beat em' out.

              This happens because he knows how to sell to people, build relationships, and treat them like a human. If you don't treat your prospects with respect, gain there trust, and give them value, you're worthless.

              Originally Posted by JayXtreme View Post

              If word gets round that "GURU XYZ" is doing something something not too customer friendly, you can bet your bottom dollar that his next launch will suffer some and maybe more. This kind information sharing is SO much faster and smoother now...so word would spread real quick

              "If you make customers unhappy in the physical world, they might each tell 6 friends. If you make customers unhappy on the Internet, they can each tell 6,000 friends." Jeff Bezos
              Signature

              "One Man's Ceiling is Another Man's Floor
              "


              "I Pay Less Attention to What Men Say. I Just Watch What They Do."
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370171].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alan Petersen
        Originally Posted by James Schramko View Post

        There are plenty of worried 'old schoolers' otherwise they would not be scrambling for Twitter with such tail between the legs desperation.

        When they had 500,000 people on the list they got arrogant. It is a different story when they are now down to a 1 - 5% open rate on a fraction of that number.....

        How else can small marketers bludgeon them in affiliate standings from mega launches unless their lists are worn out?

        The wild west days are over and smart marketers will be giving more than taking.
        Awesome. That's the key right there. I would prefer to have a list of 1,000 subscribers who are responsive and open my emails than 100,000 who don't bother. And the only way to do that is by sending good free info along with your promotions not just pitches. Lee McIntyre is another great marketer who uses this concept.

        I model my list management and email marketing off people like Lee and Lynn Terry not the big time gurus who send nothing but junk.

        I'm sure the big timers still make a lot of money and they could care less that I've unsubd but I prefer building a long term relationship with my list than use the churn and burn business model.
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370614].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jon Alexander
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369917].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Taylor
      Originally Posted by Jon Alexander View Post

      expect to be savaged by Steve Wagenheimy imminently
      Expect dumbass remarks like this to get reported.

      John
      Signature
      John's Internet Marketing News, Views & Reviews: John Taylor Online
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369932].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheNightOwl
    @ChrisLockwood: Thanks for another stellar example of your pointless and annoying sarcasm. I think the OP is all too aware that Mr Guru couldn't give a toss about being down 1 subscriber.

    I believe the point was that there's all this high-minded moral positioning and preaching being bandied about by the Mr Gurus concerning "providing valuable content" and "developing a relationship" and "overdelivering" and on and on and on [insert other buzzwords]...

    ...yet watch what they do.

    The original post was a little "mental note" to "do the right thing" and not just copy what Mr Guru does--including the lip-service to all those high-minded ideals.

    The problem, of course, and here's the rub is that we all know which approach is more likely to make more money.

    Or do we?

    TheNightOwl
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[369929].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author zeppb
    I recently unsubscribed from several lists myself. One reason is so that I don't find myself wasting time reading all of them when I should be working on my business. Another big reason is because they were just filled with pitches and not giving any useful tips or advice at all. :p
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370067].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alex_Sysoef
    First of all big thanks @AgileHosting for choosing to read my content and posting about it in my favorite forum!

    Second, while I think this post nails it - it is also a lesson. ANY email list you subscribe to can be a lesson:

    a) how to do do email marketing or
    b) how not to do it

    It all comes down to your own personal beliefs, principals and ways you CHOOSE to operate your online business. I consider people who decide to read my blog and subscribe to newsletter my friends (although the number is ever growing) and while I do pitch other people products every so often - I only do so with products I personally tried, liked them, tested them, verified them.

    Not only does it work better for sales, it also creates a better relationships. Although I do get my own share of occasional "hate email". One can never keep 100% of the people happy. It is simple nature of the business.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370190].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Charann Miller
    I actually find that my emails from publishers are content and information starved compared to just 2 short years ago.

    Just looking at my inbox now, 9 out of 10 are promotional type emails from lists I've subscribed to, this is not spam, incredible.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370245].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Fabian Tan
      There are some who think their gossip will make a difference.

      There are others who don't think it will.

      Here is the truth: most gossip and chatter are just shots into the night sky. They are not likely to hit anything. I think it was Frank Kern who wrote that the biggest number of sales will come from the small pocket of highly-interested subscribers you got in recently. That's certainly very true. If you go easy on the pitching, you will just get less sales early on and your sales will be more spread out over time.

      The real difference with gossip is made if you're a really BIG company (like worldwide). Think Apple. Microsoft. Gossip can kill you quick.

      If you're a small or mid-sized company (which is what 99.9% of Internet marketing ventures are), then what is said today will be forgotten next month.

      There will be a new flavor of the month.

      The media (newspapers, tv) still has ultimate social power and always will.

      Fabian
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370293].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author James Schramko
        Originally Posted by Fabian Tan View Post

        If you're a small or mid-sized company (which is what 99.9% of Internet marketing ventures are), then what is said today will be forgotten next month.

        There will be a new flavor of the month.

        The media (newspapers, tv) still has ultimate social power and always will.

        Fabian
        Interesting view Fabian.

        I read today in Kikabink news that newspapers have been overtaken by internet.

        Internet More Popular Than Newspapers For News

        I would not underestimate the peer power JayX mentioned above - people WILL shy away from people who start to draw heat.

        The thing about the IM industry is that as soon as you get big you become a target. People pay you more attention and are more critical of you.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370321].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Fabian Tan
          [DELETED]
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370325].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author James Schramko
            Originally Posted by Fabian Tan View Post

            Internet news websites.

            Looks like the same thing.

            Fabian
            One key thing about Internet News sites is they often have the ability to interact - comments, social sharing and bookmarking.

            They have much more feedback mechanism than traditional 'one way' media such as print.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370330].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Fabian Tan
              Originally Posted by James Schramko View Post

              One key thing about Internet News sites is they often have the ability to interact - comments, social sharing and bookmarking.

              They have much more feedback mechanism than traditional 'one way' media such as print.
              Yet it still originally stems from corporate style media created content

              Fabian
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370334].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author James Schramko
                Originally Posted by Fabian Tan View Post

                Yet it still originally stems from corporate style media created content

                Fabian
                True but I have seen many times where people have posted stimulating comments.

                The other aspect is that when the news portals are online they are now competing with bloggers and the game is leveled much more than offline.

                The election saw a lot of 'new media' campaigning and new people power methods of swaying voters.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370347].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author MaskedMarketer
                  Originally Posted by James Schramko View Post

                  The election saw a lot of 'new media' campaigning and new people power methods of swaying voters.
                  btw, good point james

                  News paper readership is down. What about magazines and TV?

                  If social media isn't important, TV networks wouldn't waste there time telling you to visit the blog and to "twitter" them.

                  When I worked for a small business start up (100 m annually) they had to fix there Customer Service dramatically to keep up with sales and customers.

                  We had employees DEDICATED to fixing customers problems when they would post bad stuff about us on Bizrate and other social sites.

                  Do not underestimate the power of your voice and opinion on the internet!!!!! We can all band together
                  Signature

                  "One Man's Ceiling is Another Man's Floor
                  "


                  "I Pay Less Attention to What Men Say. I Just Watch What They Do."
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370416].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Michael Lake
                  It's ironic. Just prior to reading this thread, I was replying to a major "guru" writing that I find their whole approach to selling their upcoming super-duper event insulting. Their marketing is just prolific BS. Every email is just one more blatant pitch to see another blatant pitch to see another blatant pitch, etc. Funny that their brand literally claims to be the opposite of BS. The question I asked them was, "Does marketing have to consist of saying absolutely ANYTHING in order to get the sale?"

                  I spent most of my career in high ticket financial sales and am relatively new to internet marketing. I see a parallel between early direct sales and internet marketing. Think of the movie Tin Men. It's full of sales archetypes at a time when telling people absolutely anything to get the sale got results. Customers were naive. But, now most people know better - and because of decades of direct sales gimmicks and trickery, we are so jaded that we hardly trust salespeople. We even have an aversion to the name!

                  I think the internet is going the way of tin men. Most of the marketing gimmicks lamented by Warrior Forum members on the thread "What kind of marketing really pisses you off" will lose their effectiveness. There will always be hangers-on like car salesmen of the 21st Century who refuse to change, but have faith fellow marketers: Quality products delivering real value will prevail, and the effectiveness of carnival barking BS artists will diminish and pave the way for talented communicators of true consumer value.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370495].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Fabian Tan
          Originally Posted by James Schramko View Post

          Interesting view Fabian.

          I read today in Kikabink news that newspapers have been overtaken by internet.

          Internet More Popular Than Newspapers For News

          I would not underestimate the peer power JayX mentioned above - people WILL shy away from people who start to draw heat.

          The thing about the IM industry is that as soon as you get big you become a target. People pay you more attention and are more critical of you.
          Internet news websites.

          Looks like essentially the same thing.

          Fabian
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370326].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author MaskedMarketer
        Originally Posted by Fabian Tan View Post

        Here is the truth: most gossip and chatter are just shots into the night sky. They are not likely to hit anything.
        I've seen "small" companies have to change there name due to bad publicity. What you're saying is not the truth. It is just your opinion.
        Signature

        "One Man's Ceiling is Another Man's Floor
        "


        "I Pay Less Attention to What Men Say. I Just Watch What They Do."
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370322].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author John Taylor
        Originally Posted by Fabian Tan View Post

        Here is the truth: most gossip and chatter are just shots into the night sky. They are not likely to hit anything.
        I disagree Fabian.

        I pay a great deal of attention to what people discuss
        on this, other forums and on sites such as Twitter and
        Facebook.

        I also pay attention to the way that others respond to
        such debates. It helps me to form a picture about who
        I want to be associated with.

        I've unsubscribed from several lists on the basis of what's
        been posted on a forum. Just as I've unsubscribed from
        lists when I get the same old boilerplate promotion from
        people with a lack of creativity beyond the cut and paste
        buttons.

        I also decline JV invitations for similar reasons.

        John
        Signature
        John's Internet Marketing News, Views & Reviews: John Taylor Online
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370420].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Eric Lorence
          Unfortunately, I don't think you've seen the last of this gurus' name in your inbox...

          Since they all seem to use each others lists these days.

          Best Holidays!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370455].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Charles Harper
    Thanks James and Jay (who I know on Twitter by the way). This is the kind of thing the WF is for, and is highly educational. Sometimes, we learn my lurking. I posted over 300 times in the last year, but I hope to post less and lurk more in debates like this.

    E-Mail is not dead, yet but it will die if you send me email I don't have the sense that I know you.

    I will read e-mail from James and Jay because even if they don't know me, I have talked to them. I sort of know them from twitter and the fact that I can send a PM and hear back in this century. I look at Twitter and see some of these gurus who follow 50 people and have 3000 followers. I think to myself, that it says a lot and they are unlikely to sell to me again. You are right when you say, they probably don't care if I am no longer one of their buyers. But that is just the point.

    I trust them (James and Jay) more than another big outfit that just started pushing their product on me this week. They (the big nameless outfit) have sent NOTHING but marketing affiliate products. Nothing. It doesn't work with your girlfriend (only talking to her when you want something), and eventually it will not work with most people either.

    This is a competitive time in our business. The big no longer necessarily eat the small.

    The fast, responsive and personal eat the slow and impersonal.

    That has always been the case during recessionary times and it will be true during this one too. This is not new, folks. Study your business texts and they will tell you. Recessionary times produce new leaders who respond.

    Read the Proctor and Gamble story from the last depression. How did they grow and lead?

    These may be the internet days, but business is business and some things will NEVER change.

    Come to think of it, I think I will just write a blessed e-book on it. Maybe a professor is good for something in internet marketing.

    Charles
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370457].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MeTellYou
    I am just itching to get some names... but I am sure you'll not give any...
    Signature
    [UPDATED] FREE 1-ON-1 MENTORSHIP: Student Makes $12,000 His First Week Of Running Ads
    Skype Me! Skype: yourebookwriter
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370476].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Derek_Franklin
    Subject lines that are likely to get me to unsubscribe:

    "It ALL starts in 10 minutes..."
    "It's A Conspiracy!"
    "Only 37 left..."
    "Don't buy this until you've grabbed my special report"
    "My accountant told me not to do this"
    "This WILL change the Web FOREVER!"
    (what triggers it for you?)

    An occasional email like this isn't bad, but when it's all you get from someone, it's delete-o time!

    Don't these people have an ounce of originality?

    I too, remember when most lists provided something of value on occasion instead of a constant pitch-fest.

    I'm so thankful for the unsubscribe link these days.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370507].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
    This is always a fun subject to discuss, largely because it IS subjective.

    Couple of things to consider...

    Your list has a life span. That's a fact. If you build a list of 10,000 people and you get great response to your pitch emails today, 6 months from now it will change dramatically, no matter what the economic climate is. That's why building a list is an ongoing job.

    Also, there are different types of lists. Some are created specifically for pitching products to and nothing else. When you build a list like this, you're not trying to build a relationship - you're trying to make money. And here's the thing...there are subscribers out there that WANT those emails.

    Years ago, when I had my first list, I had good content in every email I sent (usually along with a low-key pitch). I also only mailed once a week. I got emails from subscribers letting me know that they unsubscribed because I wasn't bringing them the latest and greatest product offers...

    As marketers, we like to complain about what the guru's are doing or not doing, but we complain through the eyes of marketers being marketed to. I would suspect that the majority of these lists are not filled with other marketers. They are filled with potential customers waiting for the right offers.

    At the end of the day, you will never please everyone on your list. My thought here is to understand why you are building a list, what your focus is FOR that list and then be consistent with that list. It's fine to build one just to hit with offers if that's the intent of the list. It's really NOT a dirty word to profit from people (provided you are not scamming people).

    You WILL get unsubscribes even if - and at times BECAUSE - you send killer content in every email.

    Understand your reason for your list(s). Be consistent in how you communicate with them. It's worked for me for years.

    Mike

    P.S. I understand the meaning of the OP's post - that's a whole other issue.
    Signature

    Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370509].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Fabian Tan
      Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

      Your list has a life span. That's a fact. If you build a list of 10,000 people and you get great response to your pitch emails today, 6 months from now it will change dramatically, no matter what the economic climate is. That's why building a list is an ongoing job.
      And that's why recurring membership sites are so effective and recommended for alleviating this fact a little.

      Fabian
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370537].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MaskedMarketer
      Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

      This is always a fun subject to discuss, largely because it IS subjective.

      Couple of things to consider...

      Your list has a life span. That's a fact. If you build a list of 10,000 people and you get great response to your pitch emails today, 6 months from now it will change dramatically, no matter what the economic climate is. That's why building a list is an ongoing job.
      I would agree it is subjective on how you approach everything.

      Some people like a larger list and just get a couple dollars per subscribers if lucky.

      some like a more private and intimate list, where they get a much larger "per" subscriber dollar amount. I would agree if you're sending out pitch fests, you will most likely get a lower response/open rate after 6 months and have to keep building.

      If you're sending out pitch fests, I view you as a salesmen. If you're sending out valuable information, I view you as an Expert.

      I prefer experts over salesmen (in every market and niche, not just marketing).

      While everyone has there own ways of getting there message out, some of the greatest salesmen and platform pitchers do not approach the sales process the way I see every, "IM" , "me 2" marketer out there doing it.

      just my opinion...
      Signature

      "One Man's Ceiling is Another Man's Floor
      "


      "I Pay Less Attention to What Men Say. I Just Watch What They Do."
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370566].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Lance K
      Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

      Also, there are different types of lists. Some are created specifically for pitching products to and nothing else. When you build a list like this, you're not trying to build a relationship - you're trying to make money. And here's the thing...there are subscribers out there that WANT those emails.
      Good point, Mike. I was going to compare the way some people treat their list to an offline rented mailing list. Most people don't "opt in" to such lists. They simply get added to compiled lists or are added to prospect or customer lists depending on the actions they've taken.

      But usually they aren't aware that they're being put on a list. And you have every right to mail them because you're paying the postage. Email lists built via opt-in are a different beast. Generally, people aren't raising their hands and sharing their info. so that they'll be beat over the head with a different offer every other day.




      Your point below about consistency makes sense though too. But I'd wager that it's a very small percentage of people who sign up willingly simply to have offers hurled at them. And of that small percentage, I'd also be willing to wager that the majority of them do so willingly with the primary goal of studying the marketing that's taking place.


      Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

      At the end of the day, you will never please everyone on your list. My thought here is to understand why you are building a list, what your focus is FOR that list and then be consistent with that list. It's fine to build one just to hit with offers if that's the intent of the list. It's really NOT a dirty word to profit from people (provided you are not scamming people).

      You WILL get unsubscribes even if - and at times BECAUSE - you send killer content in every email.

      Understand your reason for your list(s). Be consistent in how you communicate with them. It's worked for me for years.
      Signature
      "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
      ~ Zig Ziglar
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370709].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Derek_Franklin
    For the longest time, I subscribed to a number of lists, even those like we're discussing here, thinking that I had to stay subscribed or I just might miss some magic bullet product.

    Then I realized that most of the stuff being offered was either junk or just a slant on things I already knew - no real revelations.

    (BTW, if see the word 'conspiracy' used one more time in an email...ARGH!!!)

    When I started unsubscribing like a madman (still subscribed to some quality stuff), the noise went away, and I was actually able to get things done!

    Kick yourself out of the 'newsletter' nest and you'll learn to fly just fine!

    Derek
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[370916].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ExRat
      Hi Derek,

      For the longest time, I subscribed to a number of lists, even those like we're discussing here, thinking that I had to stay subscribed or I just might miss some magic bullet product.
      This is the problem. Over and over again, we have seen people answering these threads (which do come up quite often!) by saying that people should stay on these lists, to study what the 'experts' do.

      What no-one seems to realise is that apart from any other reason (like wasted time and interruptions) people are (most of the time) exposing their brains and their valuable learning time to really bad amateurish marketing.

      But I suppose someone will pipe in that they can ignore the bad stuff and just tune into the good stuff, or that you need to study it to know what NOT to do.

      Sorry. If you understand even the smallest amount about the human brain and the power of suggestion etc. then you will know that it is not a good idea to go anywhere near this stuff.

      And if you need to study bad stuff in order to know what not to do...{censored}

      There is plenty of good stuff out there, on the net (often free, not just tutorials but also examples found by studying others' methods), in print, in paperbacks (cheaply aquired, even when new, but nowadays even cheaper via the usual places online - second hand). How can anyone possibly have time to study bad stuff?

      Yet we see more and more people 'following the leader' like sheep and churning out dung in their new newsletters, based on what they have seen being done elsewhere. I figure they're too lazy to find good examples and just opt in to the nearest guru to study their emails, because that guru shouts the loudest and has the largest ring of associates giving themselves props.

      That laziness comes at a cost.
      Signature


      Roger Davis

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371018].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alan Petersen
        I was making the same mistake. Staying subscribed so I could "learn" from them then I realized I don't want to learn from them!

        When I pruned my subscriptions I just did a search (I use one gmail address for all lists I sign up) and if the bulk of emails are unread that means I'm not even finding it's worth to open to read or study so what's the point to clutter my in-box? So I unsubscribe.

        Check out the emails you have received of the lists you belong to and you'll be amazed. You probably only read a handful of marketers emails and all the others (hundreds, thousands) sit unread. Just unsubscribe to those.

        It's a win-win on both sides. I don't even read their emails so I'm off their list which works for them to prune their list to keep those who don't mind getting crappy pitches non-stop.
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371068].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Frank Donovan
          Interesting thread with some great points made by Roger, Jay, James, Mike and others.

          Just a couple of observations re the OP:

          If someone is bombarding you with "pitch" emails and zero quality content, he/she cannot accurately be described as a guru. More like an opportunist (which isn't to say an unsuccessful opportunist).

          It is also unwise to assume that an established internet marketer doesn't already know that such a tactic is going to result in some "collateral damage" to his/her list.

          With list-segmentation, response statistics, multiple aliases etc there's no excuse for any email marketer not to have a firm handle on all the vital metrics. And as Roger and Mike pointed out, lists get tired, lists may have different purposes, marketers may have more than one business model.

          It's even conceivable that the product blitz approach was simply a method to weed out the non-buyers. In any event, all this can be (and probably is being) tested to the nth degree. The unsubscriber is just a statistic on a broadcast report.

          I agree with Roger regarding the worthless emails. It's pretty easy after a while to recognize the real players from the wannabes, so prune those subscriptions and save yourself a lot of wasted focus.

          Luckily for us all, there are still some marketers consistently providing quality content (e.g.the Myerstro) to ensure that our inboxes needn't go empty.


          Frank
          Signature


          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371168].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Corwinnx
          Thanks for all the comments everyone. Sure, I understand the 'enlightening reasons' posted for these practices, but:



          The moral of the post was this:

          Don't show me two faces.

          Don't tell me that you believe in building personal relationships
          and then send me email after email after email

          (and I'm not kidding... these emails were EVERY SINGLE DAY)

          promoting offers, and doing NOTHING to build your relationship with me.


          MY Final Thoughts (as a mental note, and a thanks to the poster who pointed that out)

          When I send out any type of correspondence to anyone on any list, I am extremely personal. I ask about their families, how their kids are doing in school. For the most part, I communicate DIRECTLY with each and every customer I have.

          I can do this because my list is small, and I'm not naive enough to think I could correspond personally with every person on my list should it grow to 100,000 strong, however, I can make up for that by supplying the 'nuggets' that George Wright mentioned earlier in this thread.

          For me, my customers are about what I can do to help them, not what can I pitch them to help myself.


          The comments that I can and will address:

          As far as, 'it works':
          So does standing on a street corner to prositute yourself, but it's not necessarily the best marketing practice to obtain an A-list client.

          As far as being just another number on Mr Guru's list:
          Because I will not name names, I cannot divulge the circumstances that would directly contradict that statement. However, I can say, I am NOT the only one who unsubscribed for this reason, this effect was public. So I can assure you that I wasn't only ONE subscriber lost to "Mr. Guru."


          Sorry I couldn't reply to some of the other comments... I have to go email a client and ask how their dog's surgery went...


          Happy Holidays,
          Marcus Ramirez

          [EDIT] because it was just bugging me...

          The point was, if you want me to build a personal relationship with you, then build a personal relationship with me. Don't be a two face, and basically tell me to kiss your ass, but you're too busy to be bothered to take a personal interest in me.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371177].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ngmedia805
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371308].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
      Originally Posted by George Wright View Post

      Another question, My particular way to email does not use the "Dear [first name] feature. All of my emails start out "Hi All" "Dear Members." If the content is at least good and at best GREAT does the Hi All greeting offend?

      George Wright
      George, not only does it not offend me, I applaud it. It respects my intelligence.

      Which really gets to the bottom of all of my pet peeves...

      Every single tactic that offends or bothers me makes the assumption that I'm dumber than a box of rocks.

      Whether it's pitching me daily with the latest offer from your "close, personal friends" or offering me the "free gift" of a discount on the product I refused to buy when it launched, the truth is - I'm just not that damn stupid.

      Stop insulting my intelligence, and I'll be much more likely to listen to what you offer. As an example, I've purchased many things over the last 12 months from Paul Myers. If you want an example to study, he would be a great place to start...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371423].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
        John,
        I've purchased many things over the last 12 months from Paul Myers. If you want an example to study, he would be a great place to start...
        Ummm... Thanks. Still, I'd rather they studied your example.

        I hear you on the "treating people like they're stupid" point. Occasionally we'll all say something that seems like that, but to do it as a strategic position is just rude.

        I think a lot of it comes from the assumption that most people have short attention spans and want things spoon-fed to them in easy bites. That's often touted as common wisdom, but I've found it to be completely false.

        If you treat your readers like they're intelligent, thinking people, they'll respond that way. If you challenge them, they'll rise to it. And they'll thank you for it, because so few publishers seem to "get" that most people are way smarter than they (on either side) realize.

        That's why I so often ask the folks who read my newsletter for feedback. I get some really in-depth and insightful analyses, often with things I'd never considered, and from perspectives that remind me just how varied people are.

        I guarantee you, I learn as much from them as any of them might learn from me. I just feel sorry for the publishers who don't understand that.


        Paul

        PS: I still like your old sig file. "I'm John McCabe, and I approved this message." [chuckle] Best sig yet.
        Signature
        .
        Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371520].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author kctang
          Might also be a matter of 'you attract who you relate to'.

          If you vibe with the thoughtful intelligent type of people, they'll feel the connection in your communication.

          I totally agree though that if you treat everyone as braindead, you won't inspire the thoughtful side of them to come out, and that is a lost opportunity. (I've made that mistake numerous times lol)

          Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

          John,Ummm... Thanks. Still, I'd rather they studied your example.

          I hear you on the "treating people like they're stupid" point. Occasionally we'll all say something that seems like that, but to do it as a strategic position is just rude.

          I think a lot of it comes from the assumption that most people have short attention spans and want things spoon-fed to them in easy bites. That's often touted as common wisdom, but I've found it to be completely false.

          If you treat your readers like they're intelligent, thinking people, they'll respond that way. If you challenge them, they'll rise to it. And they'll thank you for it, because so few publishers seem to "get" that most people are way smarter than they (on either side) realize.

          That's why I so often ask the folks who read my newsletter for feedback. I get some really in-depth and insightful analyses, often with things I'd never considered, and from perspectives that remind me just how varied people are.

          I guarantee you, I learn as much from them as any of them might learn from me. I just feel sorry for the publishers who don't understand that.


          Paul

          PS: I still like your old sig file. "I'm John McCabe, and I approved this message." [chuckle] Best sig yet.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[391080].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author sylviad
        When gurus send over an email promoting the latest hot product - offered by a "very close friend" of theirs who gave them special access...

        do you believe them, considering that the next 10 emails from 10 other gurus say the same thing?

        How special is the access when every guru on the block has it? Doesn't make me feel special - which is the emotional edge they're going for to make a sale.

        Over the past year or so, I have unsubscribed from many guru lists - people who once did send valuable tips that didn't require buying yet another product.

        In fact, their emails are becoming increasingly cryptic. Today, I received a 2-sentence message that insisted I really needed to see this web page - with absolutely no indication as to what it was about or why I should click their link. Now THAT is inconsiderate.

        Sylvia
        Signature
        :: Got a dog? Visit my blog. Dog Talk Weekly
        :: Writing, Audio Transcription Services? - Award-winning Journalist is taking new projects. Warrior Discounts!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[371557].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author younglisam
    First,
    I'm totally humbled that honored to be included in this discussion. I'm an occasional lurker for the past year or so, so forgive if I'm completely up in the night here, having found this thread thanks to google alerts.

    When it comes to list building, I find two distinct schools of thought: Quality or Quantity. One comes faster, the other lasts longer. Through the guru 'rumor mill' that I'm privvy to, I've heard a lot of complaints from the big mucky mucks that their lists aren't responsive like they once were, which belies the statement made earlier that they know what they're doing works.

    I would argue that their lists have grown huge because they were first, and they capitalized on that. But first only works as a marketing strategy for as long as you have solid content to build your reputation.

    Brand=reputation=brand in this evolving (rapidly) social media driven marketplace. If you developed a following based on what you gave, and now all you're giving is JV links, eventually, the attrition rate WILL catch up to you. It's one of the reasons so many of the new "guru" launches are big ticket. They've come to understand the idea that it's easier to market and maintain a list of fewer big ticket "Crack addicts" - people that are absolutely convinced of their need for this guru no matter what - than it is to keep bleeding their lists and ticking them off to the point of unsubscribe.

    They got comfortable - and there's nothing wrong with comfortable - for some people.

    But don't think that comfortable will keep you on the hot list of your prospects.

    There will be people on your list that will bow down and worship you all the days of their life. And you'll have unsubscribers, too. It's the nature of list building.

    But in my opinion, you can have quantity AND quality if you work at building a quality list over time.

    I'd rather have a list of 100 that converted at 50-60% than a list of 10,000 that only converted 1-2%. The consistency is better for my peace of mind.

    But I'm also not afraid to work to earn your business. There are a lot of people out there that want an autopilot income with no sweat.

    I'm reminded of the checkmark on US tax returns - did you materially participate in this business?

    I have never been afraid of elbow grease, and I believe if you put together a quality product and target market it (instead of shot gunning it all over the place), word will spread.

    And I think my mention in this thread is proof that my belief is sound.

    That said, I don't pretend to believe mine is the only way to do business in the world. That's foolhardy at best to believe.

    But as John said just before me, there's no need to insult intelligence - we all know an autoresponder when we see it these days, and while personalizing your broadcasts isn't a bad thing, you can do so in a way that's genuine.

    Social media is demanding a genuineness to your marketing presence. Without it, everything becomes noise.

    Just because you CAN make a crapload of money off the backs of your list, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do if you're not being genuine with your audience. Just sayin'.

    In truth, the endearing, genuine, authentic voices in the market are the ones that will see rapidly growing audiences in 2009. Guys like Perry Belcher - who's not afraid to 'show a little skin' are going to play VERY big this year.

    Authenticity and Transparency are the new currencies of the web. Jeff Gitomer (among others) said it best:
    All things being equal, people want to do business with their friends... all things NOT being equal, people STILL want to do business with their friends.

    I subscribe to that notion, and have successfully built my business model around it. I also think that more people will flow in that direction over this new year.

    Just my 6.78 cents (price adjusted for inflation) :-)

    -Lisa Robbin Young
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[390413].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Don Wright
      Hey All,

      I think this situation can and should be used as a lesson on how NOT to conduct your own business.

      It's always important to treat people with respect and honesty. Otherwise they may buy once, but after that they are telling everyone how badly they were treated. That's definitely bad for business.

      I think it's always important to over deliver. Quality content and useful information will win over scams and schemes in the long run.

      Be Great Today!!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[390491].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Derek_Franklin
    Lisa,

    BINGO!!!

    In a nutshell, I would like to add something I consider to be a guiding principle in my life:

    In EVERY conceivable way, quality is ALWAYS better than quantity.

    As a matter of fact, here's how I've put it, in a quote:

    "Provide quality in all you do, look for quality in everything around you, and accept nothing but quality from others".
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[390481].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author madison_avenue
    marcus

    It looks like like you are now a high level IMarketer, you can now very quickly discern between value and over hyped rubbishy products. You know exactly what specific typed of information you are looking for to fill in the gaps. I would suggest that you now know as much if not more than any guru, this is why your antennae is so well attuned in spotting naff information. This puts you in strong position because you know what guru and information to disregard and what to take seriously this is half the battle. Maybe this guru does not want savvy buyers, but it is his loss because a savvy buyer will happily pay for any genuine originals insights: what they won't put up with is pitch after pitch of hyped up rehashed information.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[390582].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yourreviewer
      I have personally found a lot of success after TAKING ACTION! I was one of those people who would buy every product under the sun promoted by the GURUS. Some of the products were good, some bad but at the end of the day, I would feel so overwhelmed that I didn't know what to do and how to do.

      I realised that as long as I get these emails, I will always be tempted to look at their products and will end up buying them.

      So one day, I just unsubscribed myself from all the Guru lists except John Reese and Frank Kern. I am proud to say that this has worked wonders as it kept me focused and helped me take more action without getting distracted.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[390643].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jimcal
    Hi,
    I have unsubscribed from many gurus. The emails are very annoying. It's the latest and greatest every day and you absolutely have to have it today. Sometimes they remove you from the list for a month and then they start sending emails again.
    Thanks,
    Jim
    Signature

    Index Annuity Guide
    www.indexannuityguide.net

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[390831].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kctang
    Agreed. I've found there's only a SMALL handful, like one-two fingers small, that deserve keeping on my email list.

    I do keep the others though, for the sake of gleaming new perspective when they toss out the 'free' stuff come product launch time. I just keep them subscribed under a -newsletter only- email address.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[391050].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bannerdemers
    You know, it's kind of funny that every list I was on save one promoted the arbitrage conspiracy. Now, I'm only on one list.
    Signature
    save money. make money.
    http://www.bigskycellular.com

    tools and resources to get you started
    http://www.online-toolbox.net
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[391099].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Zach Booker
    This may have already been mentioned but...
    MOST people on your list will not be members here and will not have the vast knowledge of IM that some people here do.

    I agree 100% with the remarks Jay and others made...
    But always remember, you are not the average person on your list. The average person on your list is looking for ways to make money online and will probably have little to no expertise on the subject.

    Do you think the 'gurus' make any money off of the actual 'internet marketers' on their list?
    Probably not,...they make money off of the 'newbies' that come looking for instant riches.

    You can give away great info, but it doens't mean your list is going to love you for it.
    Some people want to be sold too...and I think a lot of marketers need to realize that promoting a product a month or more isn't a bad thing.

    I agree with Fabian in a lot of respects because your subscriber won't be reading forever, so take the opportunity to sell while you have their intrest.

    Now this doens't mean push every product out there, or give cheesy excuses like "my autoresponder broke so you may just happen to somehow see this message A LOT".

    But I think mixing free good content (free e-books, software, advice) with offers that go a long with that free content is a great plan.

    For instance give away a freee e-book on article marketing and at the end pitch a very good article marketing product. Best of both worlds right?

    Just my 2 cents...
    Zach
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[391601].message }}

Trending Topics