Piracy - Where Do You Draw The Line?

by pdrs
41 replies
Here's a nice little sticky subject for a snowed in Thursday morning.

I recently stopped doing business with one of my VA's after he informed me that he was out downloading all sorts of different IM products (including one by a good friend of mine) without paying for them.

While he was working for me I was also providing some coaching in how to get his business off the ground.

I was kind enough to offer this VA free access to my course and personal guidance and the fact that he was out stealing from everyone else really pressed a button.

He had mentioned doing this once before to me and I told him that I didn't agree with it and asked him to stop telling me about it if he wanted my help. When he told me the second time that he had just downloaded 'so and so's new product off of the warez forum he's a member of I told him point blank that I didn't wish to work with him anymore and removed him from my contact list.

Edit: Many of you have posted "poor va" etc... which is fine but I don't think I was quite clear - I didn't fire him because he was pirating software/ebooks/whatever - I canned him because he read about one of my associates through one of my sites, went out and stole all his work, and then came back to tell me about it... would you not do the same?

After thinking about it for awhile I realized how slippery a slope this is and how I'm pretty much a hypocrite. I'll download a TV show and not think twice about it, lord knows there are some pirated softwares on this computer (think big name, graphics programs) yet I guess since this is the business I'm in I get pissed off when someone does it closer to home...

I had my own WSO stolen and posted on these boards so I know that it sucks and it really does take money out of my pocket... and the program that this VA stole was from a associate/friend of mine.

So my question to you warriors is: Where do you draw the line?
#draw #line #piracy
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    It isn't a slippery slope. Some people don't think twice about stealing, and some don't do it. But yes, you are a hypocrite if you download TV shows and fault him for theft as well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5113695].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
    Wow, that poor VA. I can't believe you dropped him after you admitted to doing the same.

    That's a lot of Karma to make up before Christmas.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5113698].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

      Wow, that poor VA. I can't believe you dropped him after you admitted to doing the same.

      That's a lot of Karma to make up before Christmas.
      I don't feel sorry for the VA either. They're both pirates. They will both get a lump of coal for Christmas.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5113716].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matt Ausin
    Stealing is stealing. There is no gray area. Believe it or not, there are people who just don't pirate and that's the line. You can watch TV shows online legally, and if someone isn't able to earn enough to legally own that big name graphics software (by the way, adobe cs is what, $130 month if you can't afford to buy it outright?) then I don't think they really need it.

    It doesn't matter if this is an IM product or a TV show. People have worked hard to create it, and they deserve to get paid. Period.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5113720].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Gary Ning Lo
      Originally Posted by Matt Ausin View Post

      Stealing is stealing.

      It doesn't matter if this is an IM product or a TV show. People have worked hard to create it, and they deserve to get paid. Period.
      Totally agree...

      But sometimes temptation is strong though

      Cheers,

      ~Gary
      Signature
      -------------------------------------------------------------
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5113753].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Richard Van
        Originally Posted by garytsang View Post

        Totally agree...

        But sometimes temptation is strong though
        Yup but it doesn't make it right, does it?
        Signature

        Wibble, bark, my old man's a mushroom etc...

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5113777].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5113784].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris_Willow
    5% will always be dishonest even if they don' t get anything out of it.
    5% won't, even if their life depends on it.
    The rest of us- we're just adapting to what we perceive to be honest or dishonest.

    Unless a person is from the 5% who are honest ALL THE TIME, he/she should not judge others.

    Stealing is bad, but that's just something to think about...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114086].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Joseph Robinson
    Banned
    Stealing is wrong, regardless of the industry it is in. It's definitely harder to control online than anywhere else. You can't exactly put a loss prevention officer on a webpage and say, here watch this for illegal downloads (although...I'm sure that would help unemployment. Someone get on creating that system). It takes money out of all of our pockets when people steal content, same way it does with Music, TV, and other creative industries. Is all the money gone? No. Are we going to end up broke and homeless? Probably not. It's a problem that needs to be dealt with somehow. Smart people: get on that.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114190].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ttrance
    the internet has created a loose feeling of IP.

    Barriers are very grey now. I remember as a young teen with no money, and my parents were not interested in helping me to enjoy life at all... Downloading whatever game would run on my computer, it was basically the joy of my childhood. Had it not been for my skils at finding games to play, I would of had almost nothing to enjoy on my computer where I ended up finding my career...

    I always wanted to buy the games when I could afford it, and now that I am older and have steady income, I regularily buy my games!! The reason for me is: If I like it, I want there to be more of it, so I support it!!

    I feel in the meta level someway there is this personal choice revolution in buying things. We buy now not because we thirst for it and have to have it, and then regret it. We buy because love what we got and we want to show support.

    I think its a great value that has come out shining as a result of the rampant grey areas presented in the modern picture.

    Bottom line is: Someone worked hard for that thing you are enjoying, and while we all know the bitter pain of not being able to enjoy something especially when its digital and of no physical loss to the owner - It is stealing to not pay him what he asks to enjoy his creation. Now there is a little problem here:

    I know at least myself is part of a group/religion/country where our law is: Someones property is protected and you are not allowed to use it but what is found in the public areas is considered ownerless, because an owner who lets say, left their cellphone in the middle of the busy public street gives up he will find it. With this principle we then ask, what is the status of the Internet, and if it is considered a public area, then whatever is found in the public area that you can get, its considered ownerless.

    This means that if you find an album for download freely, you can download it because internet is public domain and therefore whatever is found is ownerless on it.

    The otherside which is actually really nice, is that while you can download what is there, it is AGAINST the law and moral fabric that keeps society on the good side of the fence to take what is not yours and put it on the public domain for everyone to take freely. Because when you do this, you caused that person financial loss.

    Therefore: If you buy a game, and put it online, or crack it and put it online, you are the one who is responsible for the damage to the original party, while anyone who downloads it morally is in the grey area at best, but is not directly damaging someone.

    So I suggest for those who are not strict on the US version of these laws, to consider that someone worked hard on that product, and by you just taking it you are causing them to fail where they really succeeded. It will cause damage to productivity and success in general and will stifle the goals of ones who created the product now losing a lot of revenue from everyone getting it for free. Buy your products as much as you can to support the companies you enjoy working with. But listen, if you are downloading stuff online - don't pretend like its murder or stealing because its not. But when YOU buy something and then put it online freely for others, you have definitely done a very bad thing in many ways.
    Signature

    Proudly free of signature promotions since 2001!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114240].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Gail_Curran
      Originally Posted by ttrance View Post

      With this principle we then ask, what is the status of the Internet, and if it is considered a public area, then whatever is found in the public area that you can get, its considered ownerless.

      This means that if you find an album for download freely, you can download it because internet is public domain and therefore whatever is found is ownerless on it.

      But listen, if you are downloading stuff online - don't pretend like its murder or stealing because its not.
      What a load of BS. It's stealing, no matter how you try to justify it by your religion or culture or whatever.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114535].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pdrs
    OK as for the TV Shows. Basically it boils down to a certain set of episodes that my gf and I watch every Thursday night

    We can watch the shows for free on the cable package we have paid for but be subjected to 7 minutes of advertising... along with each show. Or we can wait 30 minutes until the shows have aired, grab em on whatever torrent site and watch them commercial free.

    Still stealing - you bet... Do I feel really bad about it... not so much Whats the difference of just using a PVR and fast forwarding through the ads...

    The 'big name graphics software' - absolutely stealing - and as someone pointed out I should definitely just pony up the cash since it is part of my business after all. But after going through all of my other software - that is the one piece that I haven't actually paid for.

    This whole incident has really made me give an honest look at what I have stolen and what I have paid for. I'm also a professional musician and absolutely loathe music sharing etc... So you can bet that any music I own has been bought legally.

    ...Although I once downloaded a Metallica album straight into my Recycle Bin just so I could steal from them and not have to listen to it...

    So I guess my personal line is:

    I'm going to continue to download the odd TV show to get past the advertisements - at least till I get my PVR - I only watch about 3 shows a week anyways and I'll justify it to my maker when the time comes

    As for everything else I do believe it is straight up stealing and we've seen a huge loss in the creative sectors because of this.

    I'm really surprised there haven't been more people willing to be a bit more honest about their online activities - I guess online piracy is a bit like buying a Nickleback album. No body will admit to it but there are millions of people doing it
    Signature
    RemoteControlHelicopterReviews.(com/net) - Up for sale! No reasonable offer refused. Great branding for a super hot niche!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114531].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by pdrs View Post

      Whats the difference of just using a PVR and fast forwarding through the ads...
      1. You have to buy a PVR.

      2. Ads are currently being designed to produce branding effects even during fast forward so the advertiser still gets a benefit.

      3. It's legal.

      Now, that said, I also download all my television... but I pay for several services that provide me legitimate, legal downloadable television. If I can't get the shows I want on those, I don't watch them.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115447].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Azarna
      Originally Posted by pdrs View Post

      The 'big name graphics software' - absolutely stealing - and as someone pointed out I should definitely just pony up the cash since it is part of my business after all. But after going through all of my other software - that is the one piece that I haven't actually paid for.
      Have you really just admitted you are running your business, ie earning money, using pirated software?

      Yes, damn right you should be paying for it. You are making money from stolen property - double whammy.

      When it comes to things like pirating Photoshop there is NO excuse. There are excellent free alternatives which you can use if you can't afford the 'real thing'. I know some brilliant artists who only use The GIMP and Blender etc. They don't resort to theft, they accept their situation and use something else, sheesh.

      Sorry, but watching a tv programme you could have watched anyway is one thing, grey area perhaps. No, I am not holier than thou, but some things are just clearly theft in my eyes
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115899].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Defunct
        Try living in a country where even if you want to pay for movies, series, music, you generally can't.

        Your choices are download illegally, wait 1 - 3 years till in arrives here or move countries.

        Oh and of course even though South Africa is a developing country we pay 3 - 4 times more for music/movies.

        There are not even options for digital download, so you have to buy a CD of everything and then rip it yourself if you want to listen to it, who still uses cds?

        Makes sense.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116161].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by Chris Kent View Post

        Photoshop would not be where it is if it wasn't for pirates.
        Several years ago, Adobe raised their prices dramatically.

        When asked why such a large increase, they explained that according to their studies, for every copy of Photoshop they sell, three copies get installed.

        So they basically tripled the price of the software.

        Are you honest and paying for your copy of Photoshop? Well, you get to pay for the two dishonest people who didn't, too.

        Adobe deserves to be robbed because they expect it. Doesn't make it right to rob them, but if you decide to do it I will quite cheerfully look the other way.
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116255].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tricerra
    this is a tough subject. Regardless of where you fall there is only one line and it drawn deeply in the sand at completely right and completely wrong with the sand on either side being justified as gray for miles in every direction. Is it stealing to taste a grape in the grocery store without paying for it when they are priced by the pound? Is it stealing to not claim every single penny of income that you made when it comes to file your taxes? Is it stealing to take someone else's research and rewrite it to meet your needs?

    As I a writer I am often asked to write things that I do not agree with. I am able to sleep at night by having drawn my own line in the sand that allows me to sleep. I protect the works developed my clients, I buy, read and borrow liberally from all types of sources. Sometimes they are rewritten in another light but most times they are used to produce ideas.

    There is an old saying that goes "There is nothing new under the sun," at times I believe this and then I happen across an idea that seems very new until I continue to research and find a different version of the same idea.

    Draw your own line, treat everyone like you treat the most dear person in your life and you will have much success. Of that I am sure!

    David
    Signature

    The number of ideas to use in content is odd--and 3 is too many.--Timo Everi

    Content to Copy--AdWords to E-Books www.tricerra.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114612].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author pdrs
      Originally Posted by Tricerra View Post

      this is a tough subject. Regardless of where you fall there is only one line and it drawn deeply in the sand at completely right and completely wrong with the sand on either side being justified as gray for miles in every direction. Is it stealing to taste a grape in the grocery store without paying for it when they are priced by the pound? Is it stealing to not claim every single penny of income that you made when it comes to file your taxes? Is it stealing to take someone else's research and rewrite it to meet your needs?

      As I a writer I am often asked to write things that I do not agree with. I am able to sleep at night by having drawn my own line in the sand that allows me to sleep. I protect the works developed my clients, I buy, read and borrow liberally from all types of sources. Sometimes they are rewritten in another light but most times they are used to produce ideas.

      There is an old saying that goes "There is nothing new under the sun," at times I believe this and then I happen across an idea that seems very new until I continue to research and find a different version of the same idea.

      Draw your own line, treat everyone like you treat the most dear person in your life and you will have much success. Of that I am sure!

      David

      Thanks David! - This is more what I had in mind as in Where to "YOU" draw the line.

      Yes I agree that there is an obvious black and white to the issue but there isn't a single person on this forum (including the somewhat holier than thou posts above) that haven't crossed into a grey area at least once in their lives.

      What is YOUR line? and Why?
      Signature
      RemoteControlHelicopterReviews.(com/net) - Up for sale! No reasonable offer refused. Great branding for a super hot niche!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114706].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Tricerra
        Originally Posted by pdrs View Post

        Thanks David! - This is more what I had in mind as in Where to "YOU" draw the line.

        Yes I agree that there is an obvious black and white to the issue but there isn't a single person on this forum (including the somewhat holier than thou posts above) that haven't crossed into a grey area at least once in their lives.

        What is YOUR line? and Why?

        My line is very close to the black and white separation. That is me. I know that I have stepped over the line in my past and for that reason will not judge another for their transgressions especially into gray areas. I write a lot of ad copy that while not untruthful is designed to build enough interest to produce an action for my client. I have used outrageous headlines to draw interest but never misled in order to sell a project. When I do reviews for clients on products that I not personally used then my reviews tend to lean toward a more neutral stance and provide an actual description of the products attributes rather than the hype or misleading reviews that are falsely written on many sites.

        I enjoy having a very large library of information. A library that I have amassed by buying, borrowing and being given over many years. For a long time a had enterprise copies of many pieces of commercial software. As though original titles aged, I have either purchased the newer versions or found something I liked better.

        David
        Signature

        The number of ideas to use in content is odd--and 3 is too many.--Timo Everi

        Content to Copy--AdWords to E-Books www.tricerra.com

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115600].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pdrs
    And of course the last post raises a somewhat related issue in terms of "rewrites" etc...
    Signature
    RemoteControlHelicopterReviews.(com/net) - Up for sale! No reasonable offer refused. Great branding for a super hot niche!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114711].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
    99.9% of people that upload music videos to Youtube are not paying royalties to the respective artists. Is watching them stealing? Is the uploader the thief?

    Now switch the example to downloading a cracked version of Adobe Suite on ISOhunt. Ethically there is no difference.

    ...and don't try to tell me you haven't watched a music video on Youtube. You're all guilty.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114825].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

      99.9% of people that upload music videos to Youtube are not paying royalties to the respective artists. Is watching them stealing? Is the uploader the thief?

      Now switch the example to downloading a cracked version of Adobe Suite on ISOhunt. Ethically there is no difference.

      ...and don't try to tell me you haven't watched a music video on Youtube. You're all guilty.
      No offense,

      I don't think you understand how Youtube works.

      Those artist do get payed for their content when the average joe uploads the video to Youtube.

      Upload a Disney cartoon to Youtube & you'll get a message saying you don't own this bla, bla, bla... then they will say you don't need to take any further action meaning they don't care If you leave the video on Youtube.

      The reason that Youtube doesn't care is they will automatically place Adsense Ads on the Disney video & credit that money to Disney. Of course Youtube gets their cut of the Ad revenue, which is why they will send the second message to your Youtube Admin (you don't need to take further action).

      Disney is an example, but that's the way it works on Youtube.

      You can also challenge this, but If you don't own the content (audio/video) why bother.

      Still an example, do a Youtube search for "disney cartoon", they are all uploaded by thousands of unique Youtube users & most will be monetized with adsense. The uploader doesn't get a penny of that Ad revenue, & the video remains online.

      This is why it's pointless to upload anything to Youtube unless you own 100% of the content. Why earn money for someone else?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116268].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author pdrs
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        No offense,

        I don't think you understand how Youtube works.

        Those artist do get payed for their content when the average joe uploads the video to Youtube.

        Upload a Disney cartoon to Youtube & you'll get a message saying you don't own this bla, bla, bla... then they will say you don't need to take any further action meaning they don't care If you leave the video on Youtube.

        The reason that Youtube doesn't care is they will automatically place Adsense Ads on the Disney video & credit that money to Disney. Of course Youtube gets their cut of the Ad revenue, which is why they will send the second message to your Youtube Admin (you don't need to take further action).

        Disney is an example, but that's the way it works on Youtube.

        You can also challenge this, but If you don't own the content (audio/video) why bother.

        Still an example, do a Youtube search for "disney cartoon", they are all uploaded by thousands of unique Youtube users & most will be monetized with adsense. The uploader doesn't get a penny of that Ad revenue, & the video remains online.
        Do you have any actual proof of this? There are tons of music videos/copyrighted recordings etc... that get uploaded to youtube and get taken down.

        As for the ones that are left up - personally I've never heard that youtube is going through the proper channels and crediting adsense cash to each of the artists that have had their music illegally uploaded. That's how it works on radio stations but they have had the proper channels in place for years... something tells me this isn't the case on youtube? Though I could be wrong...
        Signature
        RemoteControlHelicopterReviews.(com/net) - Up for sale! No reasonable offer refused. Great branding for a super hot niche!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116281].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        Those artist do get payed for their content when the average joe uploads the video to Youtube.
        Got anything else funny up your arse, there? Because this thing you pulled out of it is rather amusing.
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116300].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joseph Robinson
        Banned
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        No offense,

        I don't think you understand how Youtube works.

        Those artist do get payed for their content when the average joe uploads the video to Youtube.

        Upload a Disney cartoon to Youtube & you'll get a message saying you don't own this bla, bla, bla... then they will say you don't need to take any further action meaning they don't care If you leave the video on Youtube.

        The reason that Youtube doesn't care is they will automatically place Adsense Ads on the Disney video & credit that money to Disney. Of course Youtube gets their cut of the Ad revenue, which is why they will send the second message to your Youtube Admin (you don't need to take further action).

        Disney is an example, but that's the way it works on Youtube.

        You can also challenge this, but If you don't own the content (audio/video) why bother.

        Still an example, do a Youtube search for "disney cartoon", they are all uploaded by thousands of unique Youtube users & most will be monetized with adsense. The uploader doesn't get a penny of that Ad revenue, & the video remains online.

        This is why it's pointless to upload anything to Youtube unless you own 100% of the content. Why earn money for someone else?
        I'm also skeptical of the truthiness of this statement. I can see the Disney example being true (That mouse will not lose one damn red penny); but do they really do that for everybody?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116313].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author alexdigital
    Adobe Suite is so expensive!

    I think only large agencies can afford it!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114881].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author timpears
    It is a hard thing to be perfect. I know how you feel. I have had friends give me products before. It is hard to point fingers at people without three of them pointing back at you. None of us are perfect. But now you have realized what you are doing, what are you going to do about it?

    I personally try not to make judgements about people and their habits. Unless their actions affect me directly, it is hard to put myself in their shoes so I just try to mind my own business. I figure that it doesn't really matter what other people think of me. The only ones that matter are my wife and my family, and what I think about myself. So are you happy with yourself, or do you want to pay for that software you pirated? Only you can make that decision. But you have taken the first step, which is admitting your faults.

    Good luck.
    Signature

    Tim Pears

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5114975].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ken Marc
    Originally Posted by pdrs View Post

    I had my own WSO stolen and posted on these boards so I know that it sucks and it really does take money out of my pocket... and the program that this VA stole was from a associate/friend of mine.

    So my question to you warriors is: Where do you draw the line?
    You don't.

    As someone mentioned above, doers do, others don't. Nobody does it partially.

    Further, don't think that those who stole/downloaded your WSO were ever going to buy it otherwise. They would wait for it, and/otherwise, move on. So no money lost as far as you are concerned. IF it still doesn't feel good, think of it as a repayment of the graphic program you so affectionately mentioned. :p See, there is natural justice after all! There is no way out, you know?

    Ken
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115034].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Micah Medina
    I think piracy is really popular in college because everybody is broke and there's an idea that you're entitled to stuff you can't afford... which is a whole different rant.
    Signature


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115178].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SEG
    It goes like this, what goes around comes around, do unto to others, if want and promote such an action it is likely what you will get.
    Keep the piracy as close to zero on all counts, it only makes sense.
    This is one topic closer related to my niches than the usual.
    I didn't change overnight, but over the years I've gotten to the point where I don't do it at all.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115213].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by pdrs View Post

    After thinking about it for awhile I realized how slippery a slope this is and how I'm pretty much a hypocrite.
    Well, you basically have two choices.

    You can hold yourself to the same moral standard, or you can stop being such a jerk about other people's moral standards.

    There's no real "right" answer. It's just a question of which one makes you feel less like a doucheball.
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115368].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pdrs
    Great responses all around.

    I guess I can elaborate a little more.

    The dude already told me once he was out stealing this and that and the other thing... I basically told him that he's probably not gonna get very far if he's going around telling people in the industry that he's doing that and that I didn't really want to hear about it.

    I definitely wasn't gonna fire him straight up because of that.

    What did it for me was that after telling him that he comes back to me a few days later and said "hey I found out about "so and so" (the associate of mine) from one of your websites so I went and downloaded all his courses from this piracy forum! - they're great!

    It pi$$ed me off! So I canned him straight up.

    So I guess really it was more about his attitude towards the whole thing and the fact that a worker of mine would tell me that he's out ripping off associates of mine that caused me to can him.

    But that's what got me thinking about the whole thing in general and got me to start this thread.
    Signature
    RemoteControlHelicopterReviews.(com/net) - Up for sale! No reasonable offer refused. Great branding for a super hot niche!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5115466].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author flamewave
    I agree its a moral code. I would never do this myself however I can see where people are comng from. I think that proper research is the backbone of all purchases. Its hard to that sometimes and people resort to "theiving" the product. I would like to think that all people end up buying software they like.
    Signature

    Messenger Chatbot Marketing Systems - https://m.me/jaygriggschatbotbuilder

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116131].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Robert H Cwik
    Originally Posted by pdrs View Post

    So my question to you warriors is: Where do you draw the line?
    Exactly where the 7th commandment puts it.

    Otherwise we have the savage mentality: If neighbor steal me cow, oh bad ! When me steal neighbor cow, o good !
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116139].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      I draw the lines only for myself - but I wouldn't hire or work with someone who thinks theft is acceptable. If they will steal from one person - they'll also steal from me and I don't care to be associated with them.

      kay
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116169].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joseph Robinson
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Chris Kent View Post

        False assumption and you are equating piracy with all other forms of theft. Nicely summed up but couldn't be further from reality.

        In non-Western countries, piracy can be up to 80%. Are you saying that 80% of Brazilians or 80% of Chinese cannot be trusted because they will also steal from you? That's absurd.
        I wouldn't say that they could not be trusted entirely; but I probably wouldn't trust them with any of my intellectual property. I think internet piracy and physical theft are two different kinds of crime actually...
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116262].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by Chris Kent View Post

        you are equating piracy with all other forms of theft
        Piracy is not theft. Piracy is stealing. There is a difference.

        Stealing is when you get something you did not legitimately pay for.

        Theft is when you deprive someone else of something they own.

        Piracy is not theft. You can make eight million copies of a product and never deprive the rightful owner of his original.

        But because you have not legitimately paid for those eight million copies, it is still stealing.

        A lot of existing arguments, assumptions, and legalities around property are based on the idea that stealing and theft always go together. If you take someone else's car, you do not just get it without paying, you also deprive the owner of his rightful property.

        So because these two things always go together with physical objects (and even many temporal ones), the existing philosophies and legalities around piracy are rather unclear. Some part of the prohibition on stealing is because stealing is also theft. But... how much of it? And what parts?

        We don't have good answers to those questions, because we've only really been discussing them at all for half a century... and we're still not talking about them with any serious intentions of doing anything about it.
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116377].message }}
  • Well - I know the answer is not in the SOPA...

    The road to Hell is paved with good intentions...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116181].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pdrs
    Oh and just to be clear - I never said "Photoshop"
    Signature
    RemoteControlHelicopterReviews.(com/net) - Up for sale! No reasonable offer refused. Great branding for a super hot niche!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116294].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author David Keith
    well, i try to do things the right way. i have several thousands of dollars of software on my cpu.

    however, i am very aware that it is very likely many people i have hired in my 15 years of online business did not possess all the licenses to all of the software they used to complete projects for me.

    personally, i think it is a little of the scope of my responsibility to "police" others to make sure they are using legit software and such. it is just not possible, much less practical.

    now do i knowingly hire dishonest people or people who i know get software for free, hell no. if people are dishonest, it is just a matter of time before they screw me somehow.

    but the reality is that if you have hired very many workers on freelance sites, it is almost guaranteed that you have hired people who used a program like photoshop, dreeamweaver, camtasia, or many others without the proper licenses.

    i guess i would have to agree that things are just not black and white. i try to do whats right, but its a little unreasonable for me to take on responsibility of what is on someone elses cpu and how it got there.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116425].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      False assumption and you are equating piracy with all other forms of theft. Nicely summed up but couldn't be further from reality.

      In non-Western countries, piracy can be up to 80%. Are you saying that 80% of Brazilians or 80% of Chinese cannot be trusted because they will also steal from you? That's absurd.
      Problem is - you don't get to decide where MY lines are drawn or whether they are absurd.

      MY reality is that piracy is stealing without paying for what you get. I'm not interested in working with those who think that's a positive.

      And, yes, I do think if a person will steal one thing....he'll steal again if given the opportunity or excuse.

      kay
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5116497].message }}

Trending Topics