Govt. May BAN Your Website

75 replies
Hello Fellow Marketers,
The US Congress is considering America's first system for censoring the Internet.
Despite public outcry, the Internet Censorship bill could pass at any time.
If it does, the Internet and free speech will never be the same:
If we don't act soon ANY Website could be Banned from the internet forever by the Government!!!
Big Corporations and Big Pharma have Spent over $90 MILLION already Lobbying Congress to pass "SOPA" H.R. 3261 and PIPA
S. 978 into Law. If you Earn a living on the internet or just like visiting Facebook,Twitter,Youtube and every other
social network this Internet Kill Switch will make China's internet control seem like Childs Play.
Please share these videos PROTECT IP / SOPA Breaks The Internet on Vimeo and with everyone you know or have on an email list. Copy or forward this
email if you like. Then contact your Congressman here: American Censorship Day - Call to Stop SOPA and PROTECT IP and here
PROTECT IP Act Breaks the Internet
I Hope You take this seriously and take action ASAP, the FUTURE of the INTERNET depends on our ACTION.
You will Thank Yourself for your Support for Years to Come or Kick Yourself in the ASS if You Don't.
Thanks for Your Support,
Kevin and the FREE Internet
#ban #govt #h.r. 3261 #s. 978 #website
  • Profile picture of the author steven Clayden
    Dont you just love the US of A, most paranoid country on the planet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5177066].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author The Copy Warriors
      Originally Posted by steven Clayden View Post

      Dont you just love the US of A, most paranoid country on the planet.
      I don't know man.

      I'm not from the U.S., but I think there are some valid concerns here.

      From the sounds of this video I just watched, the new laws will make it so that anybody who owns a website where the users upload videos of themselves singing songs that are copyright protected, or whose forums LINK TO external sites where things can be downloaded illegally, then those people could have their sites shut down.

      It would be VERY, VERY costly to really monitor everything your visitors are doing at all hours of the day, and I think these costs (if they did become a reality) could KILL a lot of internet marketers (not to mention innovative web 2.0 startups) who depend on active forums, heavily-commented on forums, and so on. Social media could take a real hit.

      There's also just the general fact that by giving the government the right to shut down sites for infringing links sets a dangerous precedent. The problem here is not just that it lets the government take down sites with the wrong links, it's that it lets the government take down sites without having it proven in a court of law that the users are doing something wrong. Laws generally build on other laws, and once they get it passed through that the government can take down a site for 'x,' it's possible that the government will pass laws saying that they can take down sites for "y" or "z" as well. You could foresee a future where posting a certain type of idea online could get you named an "enemy combatant," for example, and thrown offline.

      It's just that there is this huge movement of laws coming from every direction, all more or less based on the general theme of "we can detain you, put you in jail, or (as it were) take down your site without having to prove anything in court."

      This bull**** law, the new law about detaining u.s. citizens who are deemed "enemy combatants" without trial, the patroit act, etc. It all just seems like part of one very negative trend to me.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5206383].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author steven Clayden
        Originally Posted by Andy Button View Post

        I don't know man.

        Social media could take a real hit.
        CIA love social Media

        CIA is watching tweets, Facebook - BlogPost - The Washington Post
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5206444].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author JeanneLynn
          Originally Posted by steven Clayden View Post


          Lawyers and police love Facebook too. I take law classes and one of my professors is a family court judge. He says that the first thing that's checked on now is social media. A mother will say that she's not drinking or partying and they'll check her Facebook and see otherwise. It's scary that people will put such personal things about themselves online.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5206917].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by Andy Button View Post

        it lets the government take down sites without having it proven in a court of law
        Nobody goes on the ban list without a court order. It's not a full-blown trial, but they don't just pass those out like raffle tickets.

        Now, they can go on the SUGGESTED ban list without a court order... at the Attorney General's discretion. Again, not something that happens lightly.

        There is due process of law involved here. It's not a "shut down this website" button on a console somewhere.
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5206936].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Valdor Kiebach
    Big Corporations and Big Pharma have Spent over $90 MILLION already Lobbying Congress to pass "SOPA"
    So is this the 1% trying to gain control of the internet?

    (I know politics is a no-no on the forum but it had to be said)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5177799].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author onSubie
      Originally Posted by Valdor Kiebach View Post

      So is this the 1% trying to gain control of the internet?

      (I know politics is a no-no on the forum but it had to be said)
      No, the real one percent live in a bunker under the ruins of Atlantis and control the world through posh boys clubs at Ivy League universities...



      Mahlon
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178011].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author celente
    when you see wikileaks and other social networks helping people come together and act against the govt....they are getting scared.

    In my opinion the elite do not care about much, but they do care about people waking up and these wall streeter occupiers. They do not want people "waking up" before they instill th next financial crisis 2.0.

    What a sad world in which we live. Welcome to the world where the 1% do actually rule the roost. Discusting? well, i will let you be the judge of that.

    What ever happend to our rights and freedom of speech.

    These guys do the wrong things, time and time again, and they punish us more. Just goes to show what we are dealing with here.

    Tis all part of the elites new rule on us. Wow, fun!!!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5177810].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author biffula
      [QUOTE=celente;5177810
      In my opinion the elite do not care about much, but they do care about people waking up and these wall streeter occupiers. [/QUOTE]

      The popcorn fart that was the occupy movement didn't scare anyone. All their tent slums scattered all over the U.S. have done is p!2s the public off. If those clowns had been serious they'd have held their little campouts in Washington 3 years ago.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5195563].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author celente
        Originally Posted by biffula View Post

        The popcorn fart that was the occupy movement didn't scare anyone. All their tent slums scattered all over the U.S. have done is p!2s the public off. If those clowns had been serious they'd have held their little campouts in Washington 3 years ago.
        I totally agree with you. The occupiers on wall street are targeting the wrong people. They are after the brokers and fat cats on wall street. WRONG PEOPLE! target those elite group of people first. The minions and messenger boys on wall street are just that. They are doing the dirty work for those people or elitist that planned the financial crisis.

        More taxes and bans (censorship) is coming there is not doubt about it ey?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5195581].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author stephenwaldo
    Everyone from WF who lives in the US should take action on this. Congress has no idea what it's talking about when it comes to anything tech-related, which this most certainly is. Both bills are terribly put together; they're vague, open for abuse, and worse yet, they won't fix any of the problems they're designed to fix. There are still going to be easy workarounds for 'pirates' (the worst criminal on the Internet, nevermind child porn, spyware and scams), and at the very least the bills WILL hamper the development of social networks and social media, which are clearly the next step in online business.

    The problem with these media-companies is that they're impatient and they're stuck in the 1990s. Just when netflix, hulu et al are revolutionizing the media delivery business and finally working in tune with the Internet instead of against it, big companies come in and much everything up with their greedy little paws.

    America doesn't seem like much of a democracy when the real secret to passing legislation is in having $90M in your back pocket to bribe...Oops! I mean, donate to...politicians. Campaign money should not be the key to getting law passed, but more and more that's what it seems like.

    Sigh.
    Signature
    Need an awesome ghostwriter to fill in for you?

    Check out StephenWaldo.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5177858].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author K. Rondo
      Originally Posted by stephenwaldo View Post

      Congress has no idea what it's talking about when it comes to anything tech-related, which this most certainly is.
      This most certainly is not tech-related
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178234].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      I am.

      Step 1) Build I'net biz.
      Step 2) Leave.

      Originally Posted by stephenwaldo View Post

      Everyone from WF who lives in the US should take action on this.
      Joe Mobley
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182055].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author steven Clayden
    Problem is the US Gubment is scared because they have no control over the internet. I Believe Jay Rockerfella called it a serious theat to national security. Lol.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5177869].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JustVisiting
      Originally Posted by steven Clayden View Post

      Problem is the US Gubment is scared because they have no control over the internet. I Believe Jay Rockerfella called it a serious theat to national security. Lol.
      That's how the internet is viewed in Russia, China, North Korea ... and now the US??

      The vested interests doing the lobbying are Pharma and the Entertainment industry, including Hollywood. They are whinging about new movies that have been illegally recorded on video in a cinema in Outer Mongolia being uploaded to illegal websites. OK this is breaking copyright but what can they do? I think they are fighting a losing battle. If a ban does happen have they never heard of Proxy servers? :rolleyes:
      Signature
      "...If at first you don't succeed; call it Version 1.0"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5197147].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BIG Mike
    Banned
    I thought we had a no politics rule?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5177964].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Romaine
      Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

      I thought we had a no politics rule?
      You're allowed to talk about government censorship and strap on paraphernalia.

      So long as its made from recylced plastics.
      Signature

      BS free SEO services, training and advice - SEO Point

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178075].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author BIG Mike
        Banned
        Originally Posted by ramone_johnny View Post

        ...and strap on paraphernalia..
        And which forum can I find that in? I need a some Christmas Gift ideas
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178143].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author steven Clayden
          Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

          And which forum can I find that in? I need a some Christmas Gift ideas
          looks like an interesting Niche
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178213].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author tpw
      Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

      I thought we had a no politics rule?

      Mike: This thread is less about politics, and more about fear mongering. :rolleyes:
      Signature
      Bill Platt, Oklahoma USA, PlattPublishing.com
      Publish Coloring Books for Profit (WSOTD 7-30-2015)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5180227].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author magentawave
      Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

      I thought we had a no politics rule?
      And would we call it "just politics" when everything has been taken away from us? I think a post about this bill on a forum for humans that make their living from the internet is entirely appropriate. Having said that, I really don't think you can change these statists because history has proven over and over again that nation states only get bigger and more intrusive until they finally implode. So what is the solution? Keep doing what you are doing but branch out with products in the physical world. You know, good ol classic mail order.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199824].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author BIG Mike
        Banned
        Originally Posted by magentawave View Post

        And would we call it "just politics" when everything has been taken away from us? I think a post about this bill on a forum for humans that make their living from the internet is entirely appropriate. Having said that, I really don't think you can change these statists because history has proven over and over again that nation states only get bigger and more intrusive until they finally implode. So what is the solution? Keep doing what you are doing but branch out with products in the physical world. You know, good ol classic mail order.

        Steve
        I sure don't see anything having been taken away from me - where do you live that "Everything" has been taken from you?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5203259].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author nicheblogger75
          Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

          I sure don't see anything having been taken away from me - where do you live that "Everything" has been taken from you?
          Big Mike. You're absolutely right. Nothing is being "taken" per se. However, I think that folks have just begun to feel like things are closing in on them. There can come a point when too many regulations and laws are a bad thing.

          I know a lot of people are fed up with some of the recent goings on in our country and government. I just hope that faith can be restored in our leaders. And that will only come when we have leaders worthy of our respect. Right now those do exist. But for the life of me, I can't think of one I really respect and would follow into battle right now!

          And I'm a little disheartened to read some of the comments in this thread where people are being called "whiners". The right to complain and voice your personal opinion is one of the things that makes our country great. Let's not ridicule others for exercising those rights that we all hold so dear.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5203860].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Curt7
    Someone recently sent this to me. I think it pretty well explains our situation in the US.

    Charley Reese's final column for the Orlando Sentinel... He was a journalist for 49 years. He recently retired and this was HIS LAST COLUMN.

    Be sure to read the TAX LIST at the end.

    This is about as clear and easy to understand as it can be. The article below is completely neutral, neither anti-republican or democrat.

    Charlie Reese, a retired reporter for the Orlando Sentinel, has hit the
    nail directly on the head, defining clearly who it is that in the final
    analysis must assume responsibility for the judgments made that impact
    each one of us every day. It's a short but good read. WORTH THE TIME.
    Worth remembering!

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    545 vs. 300,000,000 People by Charlie Reese


    Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

    Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

    Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

    You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

    You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

    You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

    You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

    You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

    One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

    I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

    I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

    Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

    What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. Only the President can propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

    The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

    It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the
    plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

    If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

    If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

    If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ...

    If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

    There are no insoluble government problems.

    Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let
    them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

    Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

    They, and they alone, have the power.

    They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

    Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees...

    We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

    Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

    What you do with this article now that you have read it... is up to you. This might be funny if it weren't so true. Be sure to read all the way to the end:

    Tax his land,
    Tax his bed,
    Tax the table,
    At which he's fed.

    Tax his tractor,
    Tax his mule,
    Teach him taxes
    Are the rule.

    Tax his work,
    Tax his pay,
    He works for
    peanuts anyway!

    Tax his cow,
    Tax his goat,
    Tax his pants,
    Tax his coat.

    Tax his ties,
    Tax his shirt,
    Tax his work,
    Tax his dirt.

    Tax his tobacco,
    Tax his drink,
    Tax him if he
    Tries to think.

    Tax his cigars,
    Tax his beers,
    If he cries
    Tax his tears.

    Tax his car,
    Tax his gas,
    Find other ways
    To tax his ass.

    Tax all he has
    Then let him know
    That you won't be done
    Till he has no dough.

    When he screams and hollers;
    Then tax him some more,
    Tax him till
    He's good and sore.

    Then tax his coffin,
    Tax his grave,
    Tax the sod in
    Which he's laid...

    Put these words
    Upon his tomb,
    'Taxes drove me
    to my doom...'

    When he's gone,
    Do not relax,
    Its time to apply
    The inheritance tax.

    Accounts Receivable Tax
    Building Permit Tax
    CDL license Tax
    Cigarette Tax
    Corporate Income Tax
    Dog License Tax
    Excise Taxes
    Federal Income Tax
    Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
    Fishing License Tax
    Food License Tax
    Fuel Permit Tax
    Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
    Gross Receipts Tax
    Hunting License Tax
    Inheritance Tax
    Inventory Tax
    IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
    Liquor Tax
    Luxury Taxes
    Marriage License Tax
    Medicare Tax
    Personal Property Tax
    Property Tax
    Real Estate Tax
    Service Charge Tax
    Social Security Tax
    Road Usage Tax
    Recreational Vehicle Tax
    Sales Tax
    School Tax
    State Income Tax
    State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
    Telephone Federal Excise Tax
    Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
    Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
    Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
    Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
    Telephone State and Local Tax
    Telephone Usage Charge Tax
    Utility Taxes
    Vehicle License Registration Tax
    Vehicle Sales Tax
    Watercraft Registration Tax
    Well Permit Tax
    Workers Compensation Tax

    STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?


    Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

    What in the heck happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'

    I hope this goes around THE USA at least 545 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!!

    GO AHEAD. . . BE AN AMERICAN!!!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178078].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by swfleads View Post

    Hello Fellow Marketers,
    The US Congress is considering America's latest system for pretending they can control the Internet.
    Fixed that for you
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178115].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nicheblogger75
    Wow... Rich fat cats trying to keep control of the economy, even after they have shown they cannot handle the responsibility.

    I'm sure we all now what happened tried to tax us without representing us in colonial times? You might think I'm crazy for saying for saying this, but I'm afraid that if things keep up the way they are, history could repeat...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178549].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author discrat
      I dont know about all this. It seems the govt in US is going to try to censor the Internet because of Lobbyists from the all powerful pharma ,auto , and other big brick and mortar industries who want to have the internet restricted to their benefit..

      Well, dont you think Micrsoft, Google, Apple, Facebook etc... might have a little say in about all this with their own powerful Lobbyists going to Capitol Hill ??

      It will be an interesting battle for sure !!!
      Signature

      Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178636].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jarvis Edwards
        Originally Posted by discrat View Post

        I dont know about all this. It seems the govt in US is going to try to censor the Internet because of Lobbyists from the all powerful pharma ,auto , and other big brick and mortar industries who want to have the internet restricted to their benefit..

        Well, dont you think Micrsoft, Google, Apple, Facebook etc... might have a little say in about all this with their own powerful Lobbyists going to Capitol Hill ??

        It will be an interesting battle for sure !!!
        I second that. With this bought-and-paid-for tyrannical government, money talks....
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5181274].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Let me offer some details on this, since nobody seems to know squat.

    There is some BS in the law about piracy and illegal activity which is basically garbage. It's the "we will only do it to these sites" argument so they can set the precedent of "government controlled filtering of the internet is okay in the United States." This much is true; the justification is garbage and will expand to God only knows what in the future. Once it is okay to make these lists, the reasons we make them can and will grow unpredictably.

    But the important new rules are that Federal courts can issue a court order requiring all ISPs to block access to specific domains and/or IPs... and the Attorney General of the United States may also issue an arbitrary request for all ISPs to block access to specific domains and/or IPs.

    So if you are concerned about YOUR SITE, let's be perfectly clear: no site gets blocked without the direct involvement of the Federal court system. This is roughly as likely as being investigated by the FTC. Does it happen? Yes. Is it sometimes uncalled for and unjust? Yes. Will it happen to you? Almost certainly not.

    Now, if you're concerned about the integrity of the internet and your ability to access other people's sites, the reality of the situation is that nobody will give a crap what the Attorney General requests. So this is just going to be one list of sites you can't access because of a Federally-issued court order.

    Seriously? You go to THAT many sites which are likely to get onto the radar of the Federal justice system and justify a court order against them? Maybe you should examine your browsing habits.

    This law is a non-issue. It is an effort by the major IP companies to fight online movie, music, and software piracy by international cartels which service individual US pirates. Places like Pirate Bay and Demonoid, who can dodge a court order much faster than the US Federal courts can approve one.

    It's just the latest desperate attempt by old media companies to hold onto the old rules of intellectual property. They're going to fail, and fail miserably, but they have to try everything they can think of first.
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5178910].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

      So the FTC can get a court order (Gee, that's really tough for them, isn't it?) and shut you down
      Yes. They can do this now. They've been able to do this for decades.

      If your server is in the United States.

      The new law is for servers outside US jurisdiction. If you don't have or depend on servers outside the US, it has nothing whatsoever to do with you.

      Unless, of course, you are one of the many people whose business depends on "watch this movie for free" ads leading to a link behind a CPA content locker script which leads to a torrent site where people can download the movie illegally. Or, you know, something similar.

      Because right now, no law says you can't do this... but the SOPA does.

      Which also opens up a nice fat can of worms where once this becomes illegal, and at the Federal level no less, all those CPA jockeys using pirate links to incentivise their offers will become liable for all kinds of fines and charges.

      If you're one of them, stop bitching about "stop this law" (which is just plain not happening) and start pulling those sites down while you've still got time.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182211].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author capitalalchemy
        I had a friend who was American but lived in China for a number of years. She couldn't access almost anything that we take for granted. They weren't allowed access to blogger for fear that they would blog about things in the name of free speech that could potentially allow them to speak out openly against their government, no facebook, myspace, etc.

        She always found ways around it, but it was annoying. Even the sites that we corresponded through she always had to find a way around. It was pointless, and had nothing to do with piracy.

        YouTube is constantly banning videos that involved original music and so forth. I can understand the copyright concept, but if you study copyright laws - it only applies to original recordings and not music generally. You can either copyright a specific recording, or under another category copyright poetry/lyrics.

        Point is, I can't tell you how many times I had the opportunity to discover a new song on YouTube, and go on to buy the album upon reviewing, but didn't, because YouTube had taken down the recording, even if it was uploaded by a reputable source. I missed the chance to hear something that someone had told me about, and was rubbed the wrong way, even if it wasn't the original artist's fault.

        This act is pointless, more harmful than good, and does allow an opening to start being used improperly. That's how social security numbers got out of hand after all, haha.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182459].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author nm5419
          Originally Posted by capitalalchemy View Post

          I can understand the copyright concept, but if you study copyright laws - it only applies to original recordings and not music generally. You can either copyright a specific recording, or under another category copyright poetry/lyrics.
          Huh? Copyrights address permission to reproduce and distribute stuff. If you didn't create said stuff, you can't spread it around. They don't exclusively address the way things are manifested into existence.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182489].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HairyPoppins
    I think in the age of 24 hour news things get blown over board to get ratings, clicks, etc. This whole the gov't is taking over the internet is a bit much. With that said I don't think the gov't needs anymore power then they have. I'm sure the pirates will find a way around this. A good criminal is always 2 steps ahead of the law.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5179142].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5179203].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kevkos30
    When laws are immoral, the only path to morality is to be a criminal.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5179342].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nicheblogger75
      Originally Posted by kevkos30 View Post

      When laws are immoral, the only path to morality is to be a criminal.
      The truest statement I've heard in some time...

      Also, I'm fond of the statemnt, "It's only a crime if you get caught." Now, obvisouly that does not apply to all crimes, maybe just victimless ones.

      Again, not to get into politics or policy, but I have a hard time understanding why the government feels the need to prosecute and send to jail a habitual drug user who only gets caught with enough for his/her own personal use.

      How does it make sense to spend money and valuable resources to police people who are only hurting themselves? Furthermore, once these people are arrested and incarcerated, guess whose tax dollars pays for them?

      In a way it is related to this thread because I see this attempt as another foolish, money down the drain law that will fail in the end anyway (just as the "war on drugs" has).
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5179935].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nm5419
    I really don't know what the hoopla surrounding this law is all about. It essentially wants to stop copyright violations, and that, I support.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5179810].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author steven Clayden
      Originally Posted by nm5419 View Post

      I really don't know what the hoopla surrounding this law is all about. It essentially wants to stop copyright violations, and that, I support.
      The hoopla so to speak is about the US Government having control over what its citizens can and can`t do.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5180433].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author nm5419
        Originally Posted by steven Clayden View Post

        The hoopla so to speak is about the US Government having control over what its citizens can and can`t do.
        But it already has control. It doesn't always enforce it very well, but it has it. (???)
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5180460].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author steven Clayden
          Originally Posted by nm5419 View Post

          But it already has control. It doesn't always enforce it very well, but it has it. (???)
          Not as much as it wants. The media is controlled, only showing what it wants you to see. The internet is next. Sorry got my conspiracy head on. Time to make a tinfoil hat.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5180484].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author HeySal
          Originally Posted by nm5419 View Post

          But it already has control. It doesn't always enforce it very well, but it has it. (???)
          Yeah - that's just the point. They already have laws in place with which to come down on pirates. The new law is smoke and mirrors to use to shut anyone up who says anything they don't like. It's pure unadulterated usurpation of our freedom of speech.

          I think the best way it could be handled is to just have everyone in states with legistlators who sponsored this travesty fire their legislators. It's still that simple to say "no" here - for now. Why people can't get it through their heads that they need to just fire anyone who transgresses on our rights, is not clear to me. They rattle about "next election" and these boneheads laugh at us because they know even if they get voted out - as long as they don't get fired, they still have some very cush pensions to fall back on for having been in office for even a term -- even if all they did is f*** us over while they were in there.

          This crap has to stop. We need to start impeaching and recalling without mercy. Step out of line and you are gone. That's the way most people are treated - if you don't do well at your job - if you screw up in business - you are history.

          For cripes sakes they just voted out habeas corpus and you don't think they are capable of wanting the power of censorship? WTF is everyone waiting for?
          Signature

          Sal
          When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
          Beyond the Path

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5198200].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Don Luis
    Banned
    Don't worry, you can always move to another country where your rights are protected.

    The land of the free... SMH
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182149].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Daniel Evans
      Why, they couldn't ban cannabis!...

      The hell they think they are!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182156].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author nicheblogger75
        Originally Posted by webcore View Post

        Why, they couldn't ban cannabis!...

        The hell they think they are!
        Actually, yes they can. And they did.

        Cannabis is illegal under Federal law. It's illegal to possess it, grow it, and sell it, for "medicinal" purposes or otherwise.

        Individual states, however, can legalize under it through their own legislative action. That may make it "legal" in that state, meaning that state law enforcement agencies must abide by the state law.

        However, the DEA or any other Federal government agency may prosecute you if they like, whether it's legal in your state or not.

        My state just legalized it, and folks can go and get their cards if they wish. However, the governor has found some loophole to deny licenses for dispensaries.

        So, for right now, even if you get your card, it's nothing but a useless piece of laminated paper. You CANNOT go to another state and buy it, because transporting across state lines is a Federal offense, whether you have a card or not.

        Personally, I have no opinion of legalizing cannibis either way. I do, however, believe that our founding fathers would have wanted us to havbe the right to make our own choice.

        In fact, Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Adams, and the other founding fathers have probably turned over in their graves several hundred times by now...
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182645].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author timpears
    These people have a financial crisis they can't fix, and they got to waste their time working on crap they have no business in. If it ain't broke, it don't need fixing, and the internet works pretty well. Not perfect, but then what is perfect? We can handle the problems that crop up with the tools we already have. Congress will work until they totally screw it up, and then try to pass another law to fix it. They need to just keep their bloody nose out of it.
    Signature

    Tim Pears

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182689].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author celente
    MaN i AM lucky, here in Australia our leaders are too lazy to do anything and are more occupied at the moment with who is the ugliest in parliment, and if you saw their faces, boy its gunna be one tough battle. LMAO!!!

    But I think there is just two worlds, our real world, and their world (the elites) who love to reach in a manipulate our world to their favour.

    Conclusion : They win, and we don't. But we never seem to anyway. What a world we live in huh?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5182785].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    Point is, I can't tell you how many times I had the opportunity to discover a new song on YouTube, and go on to buy the album upon reviewing,
    The C/D notices by Sony and other record companies in regards to Youtube videos are IMO utterly ridiculous.

    I once had a nice classic video on there from a long forgotten band, so the label contacted me to take the video down due to copyright violation.

    I argued with that guy back and forth tried to explain to him how IDIOTIC it is since a stupid youtube video is hardly a 1:1 digital copy of a video/song (unlike a torrent of a movie or a DVD rip etc...) and that i am basically *promoting* them instead of "taking business away" by posting an old, already forgotten video/song on youtube.

    Those people fail at marketing, IMO. I am convinced that there is a financial benefit for them for [me] driving traffic to a video clip instead of an actual loss due to fans watching such a clip. If anything, it would make people get out and buy an album instead.
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5195669].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nm5419
      Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

      The C/D notices by Sony and other record companies in regards to Youtube videos are IMO utterly ridiculous.

      I once had a nice classic video on there from a long forgotten band, so the label contacted me to take the video down due to copyright violation.

      I argued with that guy back and forth tried to explain to him how IDIOTIC it is since a stupid youtube video is hardly a 1:1 digital copy of a video/song (unlike a torrent of a movie or a DVD rip etc...) and that i am basically *promoting* them instead of "taking business away" by posting an old, already forgotten video/song on youtube.

      Those people fail at marketing, IMO. I am convinced that there is a financial benefit for them for [me] driving traffic to a video clip instead of an actual loss due to fans watching such a clip. If anything, it would make people get out and buy an album instead.
      From your story, it doesn't sound like that song was long forgotten after all! Nevertheless, since you never had the right to reproduce that song and distribute it in any format (1:1 digital copy, movie, dvd, etc.), the label was correct in asking you to take it down.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5195702].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author goindeep
      In Australia we smashed the governments plan to introduce the law so what they are now doing is bypassing the law and going straight to the ISP's.
      Dirty PIGS!

      Internet censorship in Australia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


      No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia

      So yes fight it in the USA like nothing you have ever fought before!

      ...and they say Alex Jones is crazy.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5195743].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author MP80
        Originally Posted by celente View Post

        MaN i AM lucky, here in Australia our leaders are too lazy to do anything and are more occupied at the moment with who is the ugliest in parliment, and if you saw their faces, boy its gunna be one tough battle. LMAO!!!
        Actually Celente.. It's already on the way here (Andrei beat me to it) and they have been keeping it under the radar. Can't believe this is happening in Australia :confused:

        ...And if it can happen here, it can happen anywhere!!

        (Oh and I agree with you on the other lol )

        Originally Posted by Andrei Rotariu View Post

        In Australia we smashed the governments plan to introduce the law so what they are now doing is bypassing the law and going straight to the ISP's. Dirty PIGS!

        Internet censorship in Australia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia

        So yes fight it in the USA like nothing you have ever fought before!

        ...and they say Alex Jones is crazy.
        Hmmn.. Apparently this message is too short so I will lengthen it by ten characters... :p
        Signature
        Before you do ANYTHING else in your day - do at least ONE thing that brings money into your business.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5197648].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Guru_Marketing
    TV is censored, because of the advertisers. If something on TV contradicts with the advertiser's message, journalists can get into trouble, even if it's the truth.

    Internet is something uncontrollable. They may censor some websites, but not the entire Internet.

    Signature

    Kindle Publishers: Get Reviews and More Sales to Your Kindle Books at http://GettingPublishedFast.com/publishers/

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5197213].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author edwood
    I don't live in the US, so I can't write to my local Congressman. However, I will tell my subscribers who are US-based to get involved.

    My advice on this...

    Don't email your Gov. Rep... Instead write a letter and send it in the mail.

    I read somehere recently that...
    1 short letter = 10 long ones = 50 phone calls = 1,000 emails.

    Yes, one SHORT letter is worth 1,000 emails! And a short letter is better than a long one -- because these people get a LOT of mail and just don't have the time to read about your family history.

    So don't write a big rant. Write a short note telling your Gov. Rep. that you STRONGLY disagree with this legislation. Then stick a stamp on it and mail it off.

    Do it now. It will only take a few minutes.

    Michael
    Signature

    WSO

    --> Grab PLR to this FUN Ebook! <--


    (Affiliates: Earn 100% Commissions)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5197742].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author braincandy7
    You notice that every time there is a crisis that the US gov uses it as an excuse to take away more civil rights and the more they take away the easier it gets to take away the next freedom/right.

    Get out while you can! If you are not careful they will lock down the boarders and never let anyone out again! (unless they are broke, then off ya go) Lol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5197749].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JeanneLynn
    It's funny that I logged in and saw this post. I've been watching MSNBC and I've seen a pro-SOPA commercial twice in the past hour.

    The company that is putting out the commercial is creativeamerica.org. The commercial makes it seem like the United States will go down in flames if SOPA isn't passed. They said online piracy is stealing 100's of thousands of American jobs.

    Still, I really hate censorship...I'm going to have to look into SOPA.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199192].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PunditGonzo
    I am a firm believer that this will never happen. I know, I know, call me crazy. But In my opinion it just never will.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199540].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ernie Lo
    Originally Posted by Michael Milken View Post

    Only people that are crying over this bill are scam artists and conspiracy nuts.
    I'd rather be a nut then a blind sheep
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199576].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Ernie Lo
      Originally Posted by Michael Milken View Post

      Typical response from a conspiracy nut who bases their information on theory instead of fact. Call the fact-finders blind sheep for not treating theory as fact. Sure.
      Typical response from a sheep who calls anyone who thinks different or makes claims which go against the norm, a conspiracy nut.

      I must say your trust in your government and willingness to let your freedoms disappear is disturbing.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199773].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author magentawave
        Originally Posted by Michael Milken View Post

        Where's your COLD HARD FACTS to prove that your *theory* is correct? Or, just like any other conspiracy nut, you're just throwing darts at a board? Miss me with the nonsense. I follow facts, not theory. Show me some irrefutable proof that what you're saying is true, then I can believe you. But until that time, you're speaking in terms of theory and what-ifs. So whose REALLY the sheep? The person who believes theory as if it's fact, or the person who gets his facts before making a call on a situation? In this case, YOU are the sheep. And you know what they say about sheep....they get slaughtered.
        Cold hard facts? How about a history of force at the point of a gun? Show me one thing any state has done that didn't violate the Non-aggression Principle?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5206221].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author steven Clayden
      Originally Posted by Michael Milken View Post

      Typical response from a conspiracy nut who bases their information on theory instead of fact. Call the fact-finders blind sheep for not treating theory as fact. Sure.
      The facts are, congress want powers to close some website access due to piracy and copyright etc, however, what will they want to block next?

      Take the uk for example. When we had the riots the uk government wanted to block twitter and facebook to stop any escalation in violence.

      My issue is what will thy want to do next?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199804].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199870].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author theory expert
    Banned
    who wrote the tax poem? I don't think Charley Reese gets credit for that.

    Source of charley reese article
    545 people are responsible for the mess, but they unite in a common con - OrlandoSentinel.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5199901].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nicheblogger75
    Originally Posted by Michael Milken View Post

    Only people that are crying over this bill are scam artists and conspiracy nuts.
    That's kind of a generalized, harsh statement sir. Maybe they are just folks who believe in protecting their rights...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5203064].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by nicheblogger75 View Post

      Maybe they are just folks who believe in protecting their rights...
      If the SOPA were about physical theft, it would say that you can't start a business telling people where to buy stolen goods or your business can be shut down.

      And people like you would be saying "they are making a law so they can shut down any business they want, all they have to do is lie about what you were doing."

      You are not protecting your rights. You are a paranoid freak. The government can ALREADY shut down any business they want by lying about what they're doing. They just have to tell a slightly different lie.

      But instead of telling slightly different lies... the government decided to pass a brand new law complete with committees, hearings, and votes.

      Yeah. Sure. I see what they're up to. They want to accuse people of media piracy, a practice toward which the majority of Americans are generally sympathetic, instead of terrorism - which scares the crap out of people and makes them froth at the mouth screaming for blood. That will make the job of illegally and unfairly shutting down businesses MUCH easier.
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5203135].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author nicheblogger75
        Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

        If the SOPA were about physical theft, it would say that you can't start a business telling people where to buy stolen goods or your business can be shut down.

        And people like you would be saying "they are making a law so they can shut down any business they want, all they have to do is lie about what you were doing."

        You are not protecting your rights. You are a paranoid freak. The government can ALREADY shut down any business they want by lying about what they're doing. They just have to tell a slightly different lie.

        But instead of telling slightly different lies... the government decided to pass a brand new law complete with committees, hearings, and votes.

        Yeah. Sure. I see what they're up to. They want to accuse people of media piracy, a practice toward which the majority of Americans are generally sympathetic, instead of terrorism - which scares the crap out of people and makes them froth at the mouth screaming for blood. That will make the job of illegally and unfairly shutting down businesses MUCH easier.
        I'm certainly not paranoid, nor do I believe in any government conspiracy. I'm just a guy who fought (gladly) for his country, and doesn't want to see more and more right sinfringed on. Should the internet be regulated better? absolutely. But let's make sure it's done properly and with the right research. "People like me" don't think the government makes laws just to suit their own needs. although sometimes I can understand how it can be construed that way. I'm just trying to see it from all different perspectives is all.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5203167].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
          Originally Posted by nicheblogger75 View Post

          I'm just trying to see it from all different perspectives is all.
          Have you read the bill?

          Because that honestly seems like the place you should probably start.
          Signature
          "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5204117].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author magentawave
          Originally Posted by nicheblogger75 View Post

          Should the internet be regulated better? absolutely. But let's make sure it's done properly and with the right research. "People like me" don't think the government makes laws just to suit their own needs. although sometimes I can understand how it can be construed that way. I'm just trying to see it from all different perspectives is all.
          No, there should be absolutely NO regulations put on the internet. One of the only parts of the U.S. economy that isn't on life support is the internet, and that is because there are few regulations. Whatever is regulated is eventually destroyed because statists know no bounds to their intrusion.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5206197].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chrislangley
    I don't think the public would tolerate any censorship of free speech to render the Internet significantly different from what it is now
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5203971].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Techono
    It's a pity that a government that is scared, cant use their policies/rules on themselves,
    and other money mongers, and seek to SERVE the people, Not tax/legislate the pants off
    us and then complain about certain "groups" causing issues.
    The government cannot "govern" but they can and do take and force people to obey,
    The government here also cause their own issues.
    Signature

    My new website: www.beepxtraaustralia.com.au Cash back discount Shopping card that pays me to shop globally, and it's FREE. Go to: http://goo.gl/nKzbu3 . View a short video, complete the form. (No obligation, Free. No cost.) Also looking for Sales agents and Businesses globally, to join too. Goto: http://goo.gl/1oXdz6

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5204079].message }}

Trending Topics