Is Google Maps manipulating the market?

6 replies
Is Google Maps manipulating the accommodation market place?
An organic search result for a specific business name is now feeding third party advertising directly into the organic, none paid content and diverting the conversion to a sale away from the business owner’s website.

In the accommodation industry if your business is listed in Google Maps and Places it’s only a matter of time before the results of a search using your business name includes a link to a third party booking site. Google began implementing the trial of this in 2010 and having integrated many of the major accommodation portals are now rolling this product out to a wider audience.

Google maintains that relevance is the dominant variable in its search engine algorithms and place relevance is the new driving force in SEO and search rankings. This is a fair call if your search is for accommodation in a particular street, suburb or town as accommodation in any other location would not be as relevant. What’s wrong is that the search term for a specific property in that location is now showing price and availability for that property provided from a third party which is a paying Google client. The effect of this on the business that owns the website will be enormous as the search instantly throws up a price and a link that directs the search away from the target site. The booking may ultimately come through to the property but via a commissionable sale instead of a direct non commissionable sale.

The only way around this for the accommodation provider is to either cease having a presence on Google Maps and Places or stop using the third party booking sites. Neither of which are good for business.
There is no ability to edit or select the source of the content that is being added to the search results so the only way around this for the accommodation provider is to either cease having a presence on Google Maps and Places or stop using the third party booking sites. Neither of which are good for business.

The idea itself is brilliant if only the source of the price and availability was the accommodation providers own website booking engine. This is the logical step forward as the consumer has already chosen the property they searched for by using the business name rather than a broader search for a similar service in the same location. So if Google is true to its mantra of relevance why is it not directing the search to the website that was the intention of the search in the first place?
#accommodation search #google #manipulating #maps #market
  • Profile picture of the author zaco
    maybe u should use paragraphs in u r post.. its unreadable!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5477559].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author zaco
    Paragraph one
    ENTER
    Paragraph two

    its easier to read my friend
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5477582].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author At The Mango Tree
      Point taken and paragraphs edited as suggested, thanks.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5477604].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author David Keith
    just to be clear, you are upset that google is including links from comparison sites when searches are done for a specific Hotel property.

    You seem to be upset that these other sites are paying google either with advertising or via an affiliate arrangement. These comparison sites are displaying offers to book your hotels accommodation using an agreement you have with them, so I am just not seeing why you are upset.

    It would seem as though you feel it is google responsibility to drive traffic that searches for your hotel name to your site directly for free. I am not sure why you don't feel that google should be allowed to inject relevant information into its results that happen to pay them somehow.

    Why is it that you feel google owes you the traffic for free? Googles name and traffic does not come to them for free so why should they pass that traffic onto your site for free?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5477697].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author At The Mango Tree
      That's an interesting observation about free traffic. Without websites there is no web and no Google. I pay for my website and I expect a search for my webiste name not to include paid content within my individual search result.

      I don't care that the paid content appears all over the SERP. I just don't think it's right to add it to my content. I understand that Google owns the SERP and that is perhaps where you're coming from.

      If a search query is "at the mango tree" which is the name of my business there are many third party booking sites that appear through paid ads on the SERP's. That's fine. The problem is that by allowing the ads to be in the content that the searcher will click through to arrive at my site that click through might never happen.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5477850].message }}

Trending Topics