The Real Reasons Google Killed SOPA/PIPA

12 years ago

Totally true... That's really a big reason which is risky for google first. Becuase they do so many thing according to this act SOPA.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

LogoOnlinePros

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486348].message }}

Kal Sallam

12 years ago

Well I'm glad to hear that, the SOPA/PIPA Bill needed to be destroyed actually.
And to know that Google had a huge effect then that's even more of a relief.

I agree Google's model is based on what you stated. Makes total sense!

[ 2 ] Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486360].message }}

sbucciarel

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Kal Sallam

Well I'm glad to hear that, the SOPA/PIPA Bill needed to be destroyed actually.
And to know that Google had a huge effect then that's even more of a relief.

I agree Google's model is based on what you stated. Makes total sense!

I agree that SOPA/PIPA needed to be shelved, but I'm not opposed to anti-piracy legislation that isn't over-reaching, if there is such an animal.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486403].message }}

Keith Green

12 years ago

Well, whenever I send DMCA takedown notice for my contents, I never receive any response from any file hosting site.
Even I check back later and my contents are not removed. I think I am doing something wrong while sending DMCA takedown notice.

Can you please tell me how do you do it?
Do you send DMCA takedown notice manually or you use a software?
Which is the best software for sending DMCA takedown notice?

Thanks

Thanks
3 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487195].message }}

sbucciarel

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Keith Green

Well, whenever I send DMCA takedown notice for my contents, I never receive any response from any file hosting site.
Even I check back later and my contents are not removed. I think I am doing something wrong while sending DMCA takedown notice.

Can you please tell me how do you do it?
Do you send DMCA takedown notice manually or you use a software?
Which is the best software for sending DMCA takedown notice?

Thanks

You will need to find out who hosts the website and that is easily found out using this website: http://who-hosts.com/. The host is who you will send the take down notice to, as they are the ones who are hosting copyrighted material. In the case of the file lockers, just send it to them. They usually have a DMCA contact email on their site.

Here's the sample DMCA

To: HOSTING COMPANY
cc: Google, Inc.

My name is YOUR NAME and I am the owner of COMPANY OR WEBSITE. A website that your company hosts (according to WHOIS information) is infringing on at least eleven copyrighted articles owned by my company. He purchased the site from me and after launching it, requested a refund from Paypal, which was granted. After refunding, I informed him that he no longer had license to use the Woo theme under my developers license or the content that came with the site. He refused to remove the theme and content. You can see the Paypal transaction plus refund at PAYPAL PROOF SCREENSHOT. You can also see the site he purchased from my site here: http://nichebloggingtreasure.com/cat...tfitness/yoga/. This is my business, and my intellectual property and can only be used for personal use if purchased from me.

Therefore, the articles are copied onto your servers without permission and he is even hotlinking to my images that I purchased from iStockphoto without an iStockphoto license to use them. He is also using a custom made Woo theme designed for me without my permission from me or without a valid license from Woo to use the Woo theme.

These articles are being used without permission or attribution. The original articles and photos, to which we own the exclusive copyrights, and the infringing copies can be found at:

URLS OF YOUR MATERIAL AND URLS OF INFRINGING MATERIAL

This letter is official notification under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (”DMCA”), and I seek the removal of the aforementioned infringing material from your servers. I request that you immediately notify the infringer of this notice and inform them of their duty to remove the infringing material immediately, and notify them to cease any further posting of infringing material to your server in the future.

Please also be advised that law requires you, as a service provider, to remove or disable access to the infringing materials upon receiving this notice. Under US law a service provider, such as yourself, enjoys immunity from a copyright lawsuit provided that you act with deliberate speed to investigate and rectify ongoing copyright infringement. If service providers do not investigate and remove or disable the infringing material this immunity is lost. Therefore, in order for you to remain immune from a copyright infringement action you will need to investigate and ultimately remove or otherwise disable the infringing material from your servers with all due speed should the direct infringer, your client, not comply immediately.

I am providing this notice in good faith and with the reasonable belief that rights my company owns are being infringed. Under penalty of perjury I certify that the information contained in the notification is both true and accurate, and I have the authority to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright(s) involved.

Should you wish to discuss this with me please contact me directly.

Thank you.
YOUR NAME

ADDRESS

PHONE

EMAIL

I actually nearly always get a response back and most of the time, they remove the content ... or at least say they do.

I'm using software now which makes the job a whole lot easier and faster. I got it from this WSO and it works fantastic

http://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-...aaaaazzzy.html

[ 2 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487223].message }}

Luis Vaugier

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Keith Green

Well, whenever I send DMCA takedown notice for my contents, I never receive any response from any file hosting site.
Even I check back later and my contents are not removed. I think I am doing something wrong while sending DMCA takedown notice.

Can you please tell me how do you do it?
Do you send DMCA takedown notice manually or you use a software?
Which is the best software for sending DMCA takedown notice?

Thanks

I've sent several DMCA notices to many hosting sites, they all removed my product, sometimes they ask to put your address and telephone number if you don't they'll just ignore you

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7872332].message }}

Steve Wells

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Keith Green

Well, whenever I send DMCA takedown notice for my contents, I never receive any response from any file hosting site.
Even I check back later and my contents are not removed. I think I am doing something wrong while sending DMCA takedown notice.

Can you please tell me how do you do it?
Do you send DMCA takedown notice manually or you use a software?
Which is the best software for sending DMCA takedown notice?

Thanks

Just what sbucciarel said works. I have also sent to google via their copyright infringement links domain URL's where my product was being sold illegally, and they (google) buried that page, it no longer can be found. The domain is still live but the page that had my content being used illegally from that domain was either vaporized or buried or tucked away somewhere.....

Thanks

Signature

Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7872360].message }}

wilken

12 years ago

I do not support SOPA but I think Google have not been the good guys for years...

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486583].message }}

Geraldm

12 years ago

I love the end summary:

In sum, Google — as the world’s dominant navigation tool to find pirated content and dominant monetization engine to monetize pirated content — could unilaterally reduce piracy of American intellectual property if it wanted to. However, for the reasons above, Google does not want to reduce piracy. Google simply wants to do the minimum necessary under the DMCA (taking pirated content down promptly when notified) to meet the technical letter, but not the spirit of the DMCA and property law.

.. says it all really...

Cheers ....
Gerald.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486668].message }}

Wilton White

12 years ago

With the proliferation of proxies, VPN gateways, Torrent sites, and the ease of establishing domestic and international domains that host these constructs that facilitate anonymity, there will definitely be no significant reduction in piracy or copyright infringement any time soon. Some of the keys to the issue appear to be the desire for privacy or the desire for freedom of expression. This alone mandates a certain degree of anonymity. A lack of responsibility in this anonymity is what causes all of the problems!

I'm certain that having your products pirated feels like being robbed. It's happened to me a couple of times, too (being "robbed", that is). It sounds like you did the best you could after the fact. Legislation is always a bit behind technology, so perhaps investing in technical means of product protection may be the best we can do for now.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486767].message }}

Joey Tribbiani

12 years ago

As you stated there, Google pretty much "owns" internet. So yeah. But it's good it's stopped or it'll be much more different.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486796].message }}

jugnu

12 years ago

By the way, google will die due to SOpa..? what will happen next...? if SOPA effect to google then what will be the future of internet marketers,....?

Thanks
3 replies

Signature

$200+ A Day. Only 2 hours Worked a day

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486844].message }}

sbucciarel

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by jugnu

By the way, google will die due to SOpa..? what will happen next...? if SOPA effect to google then what will be the future of internet marketers,....?

Google is quite hostile to Internet Marketers. Most of their algo changes are detrimental to Internet Marketers, in addition to massive blogger blog and youtube deletions of anything that smacks of make money online.

A vacuum wants to be filled and Bing or another search engine is quite capable of taking over the #1 search engine role should Google be knocked down a few pegs.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486859].message }}

jugnu

12 years ago

Originally Posted by sbucciarel

Google is quite hostile to Internet Marketers. Most of their algo changes are detrimental to Internet Marketers, in addition to massive blogger blog and youtube deletions of anything that smacks of make money online.

A vacuum wants to be filled and Bing or another search engine is quite capable of taking over the #1 search engine role should Google be knocked down a few pegs.

But this not the clear answer of my question, anyone else can discuss on it.?

Thanks

Signature

$200+ A Day. Only 2 hours Worked a day

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486946].message }}

Chris Worner

12 years ago

Originally Posted by sbucciarel

Google is quite hostile to Internet Marketers. Most of their algo changes are detrimental to Internet Marketers

I wonder why that would be? It couldn't possibly be all the spun garbage clogging up the internet? Or the 'high quality articles' the 'marketers' paid $3 for? etc....

Which makes Google look bad causing people to use other search engines. Costing Google advertising revenue.

in addition to massive blogger blog and youtube deletions of anything that smacks of make money online.

Why should Google foot the bandwidth bill so you can make money off them using their resources for free?

A vacuum wants to be filled and Bing or another search engine is quite capable of taking over the #1 search engine role should Google be knocked down a few pegs.

In the event that happened, how long do you think it will be before they follow the same path as Google?

Peace
Chris

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487055].message }}

sbucciarel

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Chris Worner

I wonder why that would be? It couldn't possibly be all the spun garbage clogging up the internet? Or the 'high quality articles' the 'marketers' paid $3 for? etc....

Which makes Google look bad causing people to use other search engines. Costing Google advertising revenue.

Why should Google foot the bandwidth bill so you can make money off them using their resources for free?

In the event that happened, how long do you think it will be before they follow the same path as Google?

Peace
Chris

Completely agree. If Google were my search engine, I would scrub the trash off the curb too. My only point is that if Google disappeared, someone would very quickly take its place ... and the gaming would begin all over with a new property. lol.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487106].message }}

wilken 12 years ago

Originally Posted by jugnu

By the way, google will die due to SOpa..? what will happen next...? if SOPA effect to google then what will be the future of internet marketers,....?

I don't think there is a danger for internet marketers if Google die. First, Google is not very IM friendly even now. And second, if Google dies there will be immediately a replacement. If there is a demand, there will be a supply too.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486899].message }}
Cicak 12 years ago

Originally Posted by jugnu

By the way, google will die due to SOpa..? what will happen next...? if SOPA effect to google then what will be the future of internet marketers,....?

I highly doubt it, yes you might say SOPA will be back in the form of another ridiculous bill but I doubt any of these bills will take down Google....Google's there to stay!
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487155].message }}

prian

12 years ago

if google die due to SOPA?
then youtube, facebook, yahoo, etc will also die due to SOPA
No more IM things

Thanks

Signature

[FREE] Powerpoint Templates

[WSO OF THE DAY] Create Unlimited Mascot for Your Brand Today! Male Version

[MOST WANTED] Create Your Own Mascot / Character Illustration for Free

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486889].message }}

thebitbotdotcom

12 years ago

Well, at least Google and the Feds are on different sides of the argument.

However...if they ever form an alliance, we're all screwed...

[ 2 ] Thanks

Signature

Do Your Copywriting Skills Suck?

Let Us Help You Develop Your Writing Skills!

Submit Guest Posts With [ TheBitBot.Com ]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486891].message }}

Poindexter29

12 years ago

I think that Google has way too much leverage when it comes to online search. It seems as though we have to dance to Google's tune when it comes SEO algorithms & other common IM tactics; they kinda remind me of the NFL commissioner. That's why there needs to be more Search engine competition so they can't wield too much power on IM's

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5486936].message }}

andynathan

12 years ago

I remember a quote once that said roughly, "if two catholic churches made the church weaker than we want you to set up as many as possible."

The same thing goes with large corporations and the government. The more divisions, no matter the reason, the better off we are with someone being a supporter of small business.

Thanks

Signature

Delighfully Inexpensive: The Scientific Formula For Profitable Blogging takes you step-by-step into how to create mind-blowing content that inspires your readers to learn more about your services.
Scientific Formula For Profitable Blogging Link

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487130].message }}

Alan Chatfield

12 years ago

I saw all of the reactions to SOPA (people shutting down their sites etc) but hadn't realized it had been stopped.

Is that it now, no more SOPA (e.g. not even an amended version)?

I know Google rule the universe but I quite like the way they seem to do business (vs the way, for example, Facebook do business - i.e. making changes without telling anyone).

Whoever started this, thanks for posting.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487304].message }}

sbucciarel

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Alan Chatfield

I saw all of the reactions to SOPA (people shutting down their sites etc) but hadn't realized it had been stopped.

Is that it now, no more SOPA (e.g. not even an amended version)?

I know Google rule the universe but I quite like the way they seem to do business (vs the way, for example, Facebook do business - i.e. making changes without telling anyone).

Whoever started this, thanks for posting.

Yeah ... both bills are officially shelved for now, at least until they amend them and try to sneak them through in the middle of the night tacked onto some other irrelevant bill.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487324].message }}

Lori Kelly

12 years ago

Originally Posted by sbucciarel

Yeah ... both bills are officially shelved for now, at least until they amend them and try to sneak them through in the middle of the night tacked onto some other irrelevant bill.

And that's exactly how legislation passes - in the middle of the night and at page 1,406 in a 6,398 bill.

Google has money and power. A great combination to get involved in how things are done. Top Contributors to Barack Obama | OpenSecrets

Lawmakers who cross this giant know that their campaign contributions go bye bye if they cross this behemoth.

Forgot to add - with the passing of Citizens United two years ago, giving corporations the ability to create PACs and Super PACs and launch ads with sponsors that have pretty sounding names, it is difficult, if not impossible to follow the money trail.

Thanks

Signature

Learn Website Tips, How to Do Keyword Research, & How to Write Killer Content.
Stop Wasting Time.
Start Living Your Dream.
Click Here NOW to Get Your Hands on
One of the Most Valuable Ebooks Ever!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487830].message }}

wilken

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Alan Chatfield

Is that it now, no more SOPA (e.g. not even an amended version)?

Yes, but as I wrote somewhere else "SOPA is dead but is it buried?".

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487327].message }}

Kay King

12 years ago

Google is quite hostile to Internet Marketers

I don't believe that. Many thousands of IMers profit from their place on google and the traffic gained through google.

On the other hand, internet marketers (as they are defined here at least) are often all about fooling google. Profile links, links through blog comments, all sorts of little tricks of the trade are designed to "fool google" into placing your site or blog near the top of search results.
Not surprising a company would not favor a business model that tries to manipulate it.

When it came to the argument against SOPA most of the groups involved had their own agenda. Initially, google was criticized for not committing to the protest - then it did participate and now is criticized for participating?

kay

[ 2 ] Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog

***

Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.

January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.

So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487499].message }}

Sarah21 12 years ago

Silly guys! The real reason that the government doesn't care that SOPA/PIPA were killed because they already have ACTA- which is much, much worse. This is on a global level. Google ACTA to see what it is about.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487571].message }}

sbucciarel

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Kay King

When it came to the argument against SOPA most of the groups involved had their own agenda. Initially, google was criticized for not committing to the protest - then it did participate and now is criticized for participating?

kay

Google's involvement with SOPA/PIPA/piracy legislation began long before they slapped a little black bandaid over their logo. They spend millions of dollars in lobbying the government.

Spending Plus Online Clout Put Google in Lobbying Class of Its Own - Josh Smith - NationalJournal.com

"Google recently paid a half billion dollars to settle a criminal case because of the search-engine giant's active promotion of rogue foreign pharmacies that sold counterfeit and illegal drugs to U.S. patients," he continued. "As a result of their actions, the health and lives of many American patients may have been endangered. Their opposition to this legislation is self-serving since they profit from doing business with rogue sites."

Because of the criminal action above and resulting settlement, Google has much to fear from anti-piracy legislation. Not to mention the lost ad revenue should all the links to pirated products be eliminated from their search results.

Google chairman says online piracy bill would 'criminalize' the Internet - The Hill's Hillicon Valley

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487594].message }}

Witty 12 years ago

I remember listening to a radio interview a few days back, it was a debate between a person supporting SOPA and some other guys. One of them asked him, "So will Youtube get shutdown? It's got loads of copyrighted material."

Guess what he replied?

"Come on, no-one's gonna shut down Youtube."

The nonchalance of the man...
- Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487620].message }}
- Venturetothetop 12 years ago
  
  Glad someone else is saying this too. I was a little bemused at just how many people were reading this all wrong in regard to Google's support against Sopa - it's all in their best business interests!!
  
  It was quite funny to read the statement by Google which claims it would be near impossible to remove all violating content from Google themselves, they needed people to report it.
  
  They brand themselves as a 'right' not as a service. A company earning billions (be that down a few billion from last year) surely has to look after its own business!
  
  We all will have to take responsibility to content on our websites, and Google should not be exempt.
  
  Rant over...I'm happy now
  
  [ 1 ] Thanks
  
  Signature
  
  [B]
  Get my book - 10 Hacks to Double Your Success as an Entrepreneur
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487669].message }}

Kay King

12 years ago

Google's involvement with SOPA/PIPA/piracy legislation began long before they slapped a little black bandaid over their logo. They spend millions of dollars in lobbying the government.

It was a protest with odd bedfellows - that's for sure. But it succeeded -for now, at least - in part because there was big money behind the complaints. Money is leverage - like it or not.

I don't trust google's motives any more than I trust Anonymous - but I ended up on the same side as both of them in this argument.

The future will be handled when it comes - no reason to keep arguing SOPA day after day - and for the person who joined just to educate about ACTA - most of us know what it is. It's been in process for 3 years.

Thanks

Signature

Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog

***

Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.

January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.

So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487653].message }}

atvking 12 years ago

SOPA is far from dead and buried. Remember the "Patriot act"? It too got shot down and came back out of the ashes and got passed.

Here's how hard it is to rewrite SOPA:

"Pirate sites will be taken down and owners,advertisers,payment processors,affiliates charged AFTER due process,court whatever."

There It took 10 seconds.

Google/Facebook/Youtube have "user experience" to lose if they enforce SOPA. They will lose $$$$ directly from advertising, indirectly through having to employ more people to actually monitor their "file sharing" platforms and last but not least they present themselves as "protectors of free piracy..errrr...speech" and hope the uninformed will jump on the "Free speech" and "our rights" bandwagon

Imagine Facebook with no theft and blatant stealing of intellectual property

Imagine Youtube that only allows actual user generated content

Lets face it: It's nice to "share" other peoples stuff and pretend that its "free speech". :rolleyes:
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487512].message }}

sinaj99

Banned 12 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487640].message }}

Witty 12 years ago

Originally Posted by sinaj99

This post is fantastic! This is most complete explanation of these new capabilities that I've seen yet. Thank you for this very timely explanation.

Oh dear, the subtlety.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487664].message }}

Marvin Johnston

12 years ago

This is the first time *I* have seen something like this in a national magazine ... many thanks for posting the link!

I think YouTube is probably the worst offender of abusing copyrights ... I am constantly amazed at what can be found there.

With this kind of publicity and what I see as a growing exposure of Googles hypocracy, this can only result in more awareness of the Google manta:

"Don't be evil ... do as we say, not as we do."

Marvin

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487724].message }}

solado

12 years ago

Im backing Google.

This internet has functioned fine over the past few years, Now the governments are rocking the ships its causing people to throw their arms in the air. Who cares if a big named musician loses out on a few sales ? Im sure his $1+ million pay check would have been worth it regardless of his tiny percentage of downloads.

Google is an up to date business model, its about time the film / music industry (who are causing all this turbulence) updated their business model to match it instead of creating millions of unhappy people all around the world.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5487892].message }}

atvking

12 years ago

Originally Posted by solado

Im backing Google.

This internet has functioned fine over the past few years, Now the governments are rocking the ships its causing people to throw their arms in the air. Who cares if a big named musician loses out on a few sales ? Im sure his $1+ million pay check would have been worth it regardless of his tiny percentage of downloads.

Every single creative person on the planet cares. Anybody who creates content cares. They care a LOT.

Big named musicians are free to do with THEIR intellectual property (Notice I accented the word "their" as in "NOT yours") what ever they want. If they do not want people to listen to their music for free then this is their full legal and moral right.

If a big named musician wants to diamond plate the soles of his shoes then: it's absolutely non of your business.

Creative people make the internet what it is today. Creative people lead the world. Creative people should be rewarded.

Non productive parasites should never ever ever get asked about how creative people should sell their content or how much money they should be happy with. Non productive parasites opinions should never be taken in to consideration.

Originally Posted by solado

Google is an up to date business model, its about time the film / music industry (who are causing all this turbulence) updated their business model to match it instead of creating millions of unhappy people all around the world.

Oh so the legal owners and producers of intellectual property should make room for the parasites and leeches making billions from THEFT? They should update their business model to allow for piracy and theft?

Why don't you just admit it: you create nothing at all, and you like getting other peoples stuff for free on the net?

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5489048].message }}

magentawave

11 years ago

This is an old post but I don't want the state F-ing up the internet like they do with everything else so we all need to do everything to stop any attempts for censorship by signing petitions like the ones — Demand Progress and similar sites put out. Lets face it, these thugs basically murdered Aaron Swartz who stopped SOPA with his Demand Progress site, so creating a phony false flag op as a pretext to internet censorship isn't beyond them. In fact, as of two weeks ago these same psychopathic control freaks in both houses were still trying to roll out their next version of internet control.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7856911].message }}

juangarciamtl

11 years ago

i think information should be free
so we can advance and create more
advance in technology is copy the ideas other people had
and make them better. basically thats how all greates invents
were made. so it advance more and more

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

More than 105 modules , scrapes, post and make money.
http://autopostingtools.com/

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7871747].message }}

Istvan Horvath

11 years ago

Originally Posted by juangarciamtl

i think information should be free
so we can advance and create more
advance in technology is copy the ideas other people had
and make them better. basically thats how all greates invents
were made. so it advance more and more

Complete bulls*t... as many of your other posts today.

Can you create me a script for free? It's just information, what the heck... it should be free so that I can advance and create more (money).
:p

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7872291].message }}

The Real Reasons Google Killed SOPA/PIPA

Trending Topics

Been a while! Any of you Old Timers here?

How much does the rebranding affect CR ?

Are billboards still effective in driving customers?

Boat and Jet Ski Rentals...... Door Hangers Effective?

Clickbank low cost recurring