Name+Email Vs. Just Email in Optins... which is better?

13 replies
Which do you think is better for optins?

Name+Email

or

Just email address?

Does adding a first name or name in every email makes the relationship building more powerful or is it not that much significant?

Common sense would say dropping the Name field and focusing only on email would increase conversions, but I will not be convinced without data.

Intuition can be applied only on the absence of data... not a choice when real empirical data can be obtained!

If anyone has experimented on this, I would like to know your conclusion!

I am going to run an experiment anyway!
#email #optins
  • Profile picture of the author Shaun OReilly
    I usually see a 10-15% increase in visitor-to-subscriber
    conversion rate when I ask for the e-mail only vs. the
    name and e-mail.

    However...

    You also need to track further along in your sales process
    to see the effect on your other business metrics, especially
    sales.

    You need to test it for yourself to validate the best set-up
    for you and your market.

    I tend to ask for e-mail only on the prospect lists knowing
    that I'll get their full details automatically if they make a
    purchase and move onto the more important buyer list.

    Dedicated to mutual success,

    Shaun
    Signature

    .

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285002].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author NicheDad
      Originally Posted by Shaun OReilly View Post

      I usually see a 10-15% increase in visitor-to-subscriber
      conversion rate when I ask for the e-mail only vs. the
      name and e-mail.
      Just the type of data I came to see, thanks.
      Signature

      Discuss your favorite cancelled or ended TV shows in a fun friendly community.
      Check out this political debate forum.
      Also run an awesome community where you can get FREE Tech Support.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285149].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kal Sallam
    In the markets I'm involved in (Anxiety & Depression) Having my subscriber
    Name establishes more connection & rapport. These type of audiences
    Are dying for someone to talk to about their problem,
    So making it on personal level gets them really involved.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285062].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Challendge
    Having the name before someone buys is good because you can build that into your auto-responder emails. However, people know that the email wasn't just sent to them and are aware that it's a program inputting their name in that field. It's still more personal than no name at all.

    I've actually never tracked my results from both methods and it's a really good question. When I'm not 100% sure about something, I split-test. Try that.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285128].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by Deepak Media View Post

    Which do you think is better for optins?
    Well DEEPAK, let me tell you what I think. You see, DEEPAK, every once in a while someone will send me an email full of my name. You know what I mean, right DEEPAK? They just use the crap out of it, DEEPAK. It drives me nuts, and... well, DEEPAK, I'm sure you feel the same.

    Those who do not ask for my name can never do this.

    I consider that a plus.
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285152].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Matt Duggan
      In the IM/Make Money Online markets, getting just the e-mail tends to work better.

      In other markets (health and fitness in my case), it works to get both, as that way you can use their name in the e-mail subject line and perhaps at the start of the e-mail copy.

      CDarklock is right, don't over-use their name as it's irritating.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285236].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ToddRestrepo
    I actually ran a list building seminar a while back and I recommended to only ask for an email because the less you ask for the less they have to fill in and whenever you can make it easier for people the more likely are to respond.

    As far as building relationships you that is what your AR series is for. Unless you have customers emailing you directly (in which case you would have their name anyway) you will see a higher conversion rate or sign ups when asking for an email addy alone.

    Take care!
    Todd
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285217].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ron Douglas
    Outside of the IM niche where every subscriber is a scorned ex-girlfriend who is "not going to be played for a fool again," having the name is a huge plus. In fact, the value of your database is increased dramatically with the more specific data you have - name, location, purchase history, etc.

    But as Shaun said above, you have to determine if getting more leads by just asking for the email is worth it in the long run.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285239].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Deepak Media
    What about the IM niche where people are new to IM? They may not know about Autoresponders and would feel as if I am communicating personally.
    Signature
    Digital Marketing Author | Speaker | Consultant

    Read my Blog: DigitalDeepak.com

    @ Bangalore, India.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285274].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kal Sallam
      Originally Posted by Deepak Media View Post

      What about the IM niche where people are new to IM? They may not know about Autoresponders and would feel as if I am communicating personally.
      Eventually they will yeah? Because your going to teach them yeah?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285346].message }}
    • Hi Deepak

      This is exactly the question I have been asking myself, and I'm just about to start a test without name. I have to say my thoughts have been inline with what seems to be the majority of people here, i.e. that no name in IM is the way to go.

      I'll let you know how it goes.

      cheers
      Andy
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285367].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        I stopped asking for their names a long time ago, in all my niches, and my opt-in rates went up around 15% across the board.

        I'm not going to use their names in my autoresponder emails anyway, because people think it makes you sound like an insurance salesperson. They know perfectly well that you're doing it with an automated gadget from where they opted in. I don't believe for a moment that you gain anything in "attempted personalization" - people see through that. I think it's probably a disadvantage to use their names.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285787].message }}

Trending Topics