Single Opt-in vs. Double Opt-in. A Real Controversy?
The truth is that each opt-in form has its own advantages and its own disadvantages.
Then ... Can someone actually say "This form of opt-in is better"? As a matter of fact, the answer is NO, and that's why the whole controversy.
The truth is that someone may only say, "This form of opt-in is better FOR ME"
Why is that? Because on a case by case basis, you may see that a certain disadvantage for another person, it may not be a disadvantage for you.
For example, if you sell ad space in your newsletters, then you may not want to cheat your advertisers by adding to your list also "subscribers" who actually never receive your emails. That's why you may want to go for double opt-in.
However, if you send only commercial emails that are for your own profit and you don't sell ad space, then you don't have to worry about the fact that some subscribers may actually never receive your emails. That's why you may want to go for single opt-in.
And so on and so forth ...
Conclusion: single opt-in vs. double opt-in controversy is just an artificial controversy due to a wrong approach based on the wrong thinking "What is best for me it has to be best for you, no matter whether I know your goals or not."
What do YOU think?
Easy email marketing automation without moving your lists.