"Gurus" File Lawsuit Against Google

by X
7 replies
I'm wondering what became of this:

"Here is my promise.

I am going to spear head a law suit against google.

I will talk to my top 10 friends that are hurting by this
and I will take a law suit to google

I will then use my Pubic Relations person to do everything
we can to get this law suit in every newspaper, TV, and online
medium we can.

I will also contact the guys at wired and such that love these stories
and I will do my best to win this case."
The topic is from the old forum:
The Warrior Forum - Mike Filsaime is Right... Now What Can We Do?

X
#file #google #gurus #lawsuit
  • Profile picture of the author theyoungmarketer
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[588943].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
      @theyoungmarketer,
      "X" wasn't making a statement only quoting what was said in an older thread.

      @X,
      I remember that thread and have not heard anything since he said that.
      It could be tied up in litigation???

      Have a Great Day!
      Michael
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[588969].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LB
    I'm actually surprised that Google hasn't disallowed words like "scam" from Adwords...supposedly they're all about "user experience" and they don't allow words like "best" but I guess "scammer" is OK in Google's eyes.
    Signature
    Tired of Article Marketing, Backlink Spamming and Other Crusty Old Traffic Methods?

    Click Here.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[589020].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
      Originally Posted by LB View Post

      I'm actually surprised that Google hasn't disallowed words like "scam" from Adwords...supposedly they're all about "user experience" and they don't allow words like "best" but I guess "scammer" is OK in Google's eyes.
      That's an interesting point...

      Superlatives are not permitted but "defamatory" statements or questions are.

      Sorta throws an ethical monkey wrench into the gears of Google's unimpeded march toward user experience nirvana, eh?

      Brian <- Scam?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[589065].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
        Originally Posted by LoudMac View Post


        Sorta throws an ethical monkey wrench into the gears of Google's unimpeded march toward user experience nirvana, eh?

        Brian
        LOL Brian,

        I sorta thought we had reached that milestone by the time God created Eve.

        Seems like we've been going backwards since then...:p

        KJ
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[589076].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
          Originally Posted by Killer Joe View Post

          LOL Brian,

          I sorta thought we had reached that milestone by the time God created Eve.

          Seems like we've been going backwards since then...:p

          KJ
          : )

          The question is... was the apple dynamically inserted?

          Campaign: Mankind
          Ad Group: Apple

          Don't Touch The {keyword}
          Revealing text reveals shocker
          Get the facts about your damnation
          www.GoogleNatas.com

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[589092].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Sam Rodrigo
          Originally Posted by Killer Joe View Post

          LOL Brian,

          I sorta thought we had reached that milestone by the time God created Eve.

          Seems like we've been going backwards since then...:p

          KJ
          Last I heard, Google provided the DNA for Eve.

          Sam.
          Signature
          RICH SAGE BLOG

          LOCAL AFFILIATE GOLD MINE:
          >> CLICK: BiiG NETWORK LAUNCH WSO
          <<
          SIGN UP FREE. LIMITED NICHES/LOCATIONS!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[589182].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Floyd Fisher
      Originally Posted by LB View Post

      I'm actually surprised that Google hasn't disallowed words like "scam" from Adwords...supposedly they're all about "user experience" and they don't allow words like "best" but I guess "scammer" is OK in Google's eyes.
      If they tried that, do you know how fast I could raise a warchest to fight it?

      What if something really is a scam? Are you going to allow the truth to be censored like that?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[596918].message }}

Trending Topics