Digg sold for $500,000 (yes, only five 0's)

11 years ago

Well I guess the owner of Digg didn't want $200,000,000 in 2008. SMH
He must have had his own personal reason for not selling for
that much money.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599194].message }}

Kurt

11 years ago

Only $500,000? It's probably worth that much just for SEO.

Thanks

Signature

Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599202].message }}

billthelord

11 years ago

That's amazing. One of the lessons from this might be to "sell when you get a great offer."

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599208].message }}

fedor50

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Calamaroo

Used to be worth as much as $160,000,000. In 2008, Google wanted it for $200,000,000! ARTICLE

Wow that's shocking. I would have at least expected Digg to demand somewhere in the millions range

Thanks

Signature

How To Go From Zero To $100 A Day Following One Simple Method!

$100-$250 Per Day Using This Dead Simple, Easy To Do Method!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599212].message }}

Angela V. Edwards

11 years ago

Who purchased it, do you know?

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

$83.2 Billion Dollars every year. One of the world's most profitable niches.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599215].message }}

billthelord 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards

Who purchased it, do you know?

The buyer is New York technology development firm Betaworks, which is attempting to revive a news-sharing site that was outmaneuvered by Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc.

Very interesting read.
- Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599255].message }}
- towhidzaman 11 years ago
  
  Really its very interesting. Everybody should take a look. Feeling sorry for all bookmarking website... They disappearing. & Google getting more n more power...
  
  Originally Posted by billthelord
  
  Very interesting read.
  
  Thanks
  
  Signature
  [FB Community] >> The Marketing Cartel
  [Solo Ad Group] >> The Solo Ad Cartel
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600767].message }}
Rod Cortez 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards

Who purchased it, do you know?

Straight from the article: "The buyer is New York technology development firm Betaworks."

RoD
- Thanks
Signature

"Your personal philosophy is the greatest determining factor in how your life works out."
- Jim Rohn
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599298].message }}

Angela V. Edwards

11 years ago

Thank you for this information.

Thanks

Signature

$83.2 Billion Dollars every year. One of the world's most profitable niches.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599289].message }}

Kal Sallam

11 years ago

Why are we seeing major sites being sold recently. Hostgator was also just sold.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599309].message }}

sbucciarel Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kal Sallam

Why are we seeing major sites being sold recently. Hostgator was also just sold.

Well, I wouldn't call Digg a major site. Hasn't been one for awhile now, hence the dirt cheap price. But to answer the question ... I think nearly every site owner has a price point at which they would sell.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599326].message }}
Cyberdog1 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kal Sallam

Why are we seeing major sites being sold recently. Hostgator was also just sold.

New World Order

Hostgator sold for an incredibly high Market Price as it should do for it's worth and that was more of a takeover by the owners of Bluehost, I can't believe Digg sold for $500,000 (£362,000) though!

That's the price of a 2 bedroom apartment in Ealing. London!

It may not be as major as it once was but at that price and with a bit more investment and a few changes it could be pushed right back up to the higher echelons
- Thanks
Signature

Most think that it was God who created man in his own image but it was us who created God in ours.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601085].message }}

imgeek2727

11 years ago

That's one ZERO too much. Let's face it, what made Digg such a compelling community was the tight-knit group of "cool kids" that coalesced around the site. These guys, as annoying as they might have seemed at times, wielded lots of influence because many of them also blogged and also posted on many forums. When Digg decided to "monetize" the site harder, the cool kids shipped out to ... you guessed it... Reddit. Digg, to this group, "sold out."

That's why 4chan.org is very careful how it tweaks its site. You don't want to tick off the community that puts food on your table.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599313].message }}

wenotice

11 years ago

Originally Posted by imgeek2727

That's one ZERO too much. Let's face it, what made Digg such a compelling community was the tight-knit group of "cool kids" that coalesced around the site. These guys, as annoying as they might have seemed at times, wielded lots of influence because many of them also blogged and also posted on many forums. When Digg decided to "monetize" the site harder, the cool kids shipped out to ... you guessed it... Reddit. Digg, to this group, "sold out."

That's why 4chan.org is very careful how it tweaks its site. You don't want to tick off the community that puts food on your table.

Yes you do have to take into account the community. But you also have to grow the business and be able to adapt. I think they sold for a bargain, but it makes me wonder what else was behind the deal for such a low price. I suppose we will see what happens in the coming months.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599361].message }}

billthelord

11 years ago

The power of Twitter and Facebook.

Wonder what the next 'super power' will be to knock them off.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599318].message }}

imgeek2727

11 years ago

Originally Posted by billthelord

The power of Twitter and Facebook.

Wonder what the next 'super power' will be to knock them off.

Twitter, despite the high profile, is actually looking vulnerable. Its monetization system and business model are, frankly, WEAK. So much hype. So much influence. Not much to show for it. Honestly, I think its founders missed the boat when they chose to turn Twitter into an ad-powered DESTINATION like Google instead of an API / Cloud services firm.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599358].message }}

billthelord

11 years ago

Originally Posted by imgeek2727

Twitter, despite the high profile, is actually looking vulnerable. Its monetization system and business model are, frankly, WEAK. So much hype. So much influence. Not much to show for it. Honestly, I think its founders missed the boat when they chose to turn Twitter into an ad-powered DESTINATION like Google instead of an API / Cloud services firm.

Good analysis. I agree. There have been some good articles on how they started and all the turbulence they face. It will be interesting to see if they get knocked off their perch in the next couple of years.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599500].message }}

imgeek2727

11 years ago

Originally Posted by billthelord

Good analysis. I agree. There have been some good articles on how they started and all the turbulence they face. It will be interesting to see if they get knocked off their perch in the next couple of years.

That would be bad news indeed for marketers that successfully figured out how to turn retweets into gold. There was a buy and sell ad from a webmaster selling his dating site twitter business for 100K at another site. Twitter is no joke. Let's hope it doesn't get knocked off its perch because it serves a great social function (and makes some people rich) WHILE generating good returns for its investors. Win Win situation. That's the gold standard of business - everyone wins, right?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599521].message }}

bt 11 years ago

You know the old saying, can't cry over spilt milk, but I bet Dig wishes they would have took the $200,000,000 offer when Google wanted to buy.
- Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599725].message }}
- kolbywhite28 11 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by bt
  
  You know the old saying, can't cry over spilt milk, but I bet Dig wishes they would have took the $200,000,000 offer when Google wanted to buy.
  
  I'm pretty sure at that time, they were thinking they can turn the company into a much bigger one.
  
  Anybody is thinking what the 7 million visitors per month represent in terms of email marketing and CPA?
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599805].message }}

StevenBernard

11 years ago

Haven't heard much about Digg lately, its always been a useful tool tho

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599325].message }}

AceOfShirts

11 years ago

Guess they should have made a movie about how it was created and then taken the company public.

Very interesting article to read. I'm in the planning stages of a couple of social sites that I think have the potential to become pretty big. Guess I'll have to sell when I get a really good offer.

Thanks

Signature

ULTIMATE DISRUPTIVE MARKETING RESELLER SUITE: Social WiFi, App Maker, Loyalty Program, SMS Text Marketing, Kiosk & Coupon Software, Broadcast VoiceMail, Beacons & MORE! UNBELIEVABLE LOW PRICE!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599337].message }}

billthelord

11 years ago

Didn't Mark Cuban sell out to Yahoo just at the right time?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599352].message }}

WillR

11 years ago

What a fool for not selling when they could have. Digg was only ever going down hill. It was not a long-term business model especially with sites like Facebook and Twitter hitting the scene. Why would people go to the bother of posting stuff on Digg when they can share it instantly with their friends?

[ 1 ] Thanks
2 replies

Signature

.

âž¨ Here's How to Make Your First $177 Online
This Week Using the Piggyback Method...

.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599892].message }}

kolbywhite28

11 years ago

Originally Posted by WillR

What a fool for not selling when they could have. Digg was only ever going down hill. It was not a long-term business model especially with sites like Facebook and Twitter hitting the scene. Why would people go to the bother of posting stuff on Digg when they can share it instantly with their friends?

You are speaking with the benefit of hindsight. Reddit seems to be going up.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599898].message }}

WillR 11 years ago

Originally Posted by kolbywhite28

You are speaking with the benefit of hindsight. Reddit seems to be going up.

I sure am... and ain't it a great thing.

I bet the owner(s) of Digg wish they had the advantage of hindsight.

In my mind they were either greedy or the money didn't matter to them.

If it was greed that made them turn down those original offers then all I can say is sucked in. No business is a certain especially in the online world. So if you get a ridiculously high offer why on earth would you not take it.

If it was because money didn't matter to them then cool. They don't care anyway.
- Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature

.
âž¨ Here's How to Make Your First $177 Online
This Week Using the Piggyback Method...

.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600891].message }}
- Nicole7575 11 years ago
  
  ah...the good ol' days of Digg ....The price tag appears more like a distress firesale
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600961].message }}

Fraggler

11 years ago

Originally Posted by WillR

What a fool for not selling when they could have. Digg was only ever going down hill. It was not a long-term business model especially with sites like Facebook and Twitter hitting the scene. Why would people go to the bother of posting stuff on Digg when they can share it instantly with their friends?

There was nothing wrong with the type of site. Reddit is pumping along nicely. The problem was as mentioned before - pushing the community away to try and make more from it. Digg and Reddit lets you share with the whole world, not just your friends.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

- Stop Wasting Time & Money on Traffic!
- You Can't Improve What You Don't Measure
- Why You Should Create Separate Desktop and Mobile Google Adwords Campaigns

Connect with me on LinkedIn

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599989].message }}

vikingmarketer

11 years ago

Yep digg more or less ended up doing the myspace mistake.

Place advertisement in a way that was annoying to users.

And also the bigger sites that have been sold recently shouldn't freak anyone out.

When you run such big sites, especially the way they are setup. It's gonna be a battle most of the time even with lots of employees.

And who wouldn't want to get rid of the possible stress to make sure the sites and employees is at the top, if you have had the sites in quite some years.

If it were me I would probably also do that after some time, to be able to kick back and relax and possibly dive into other ventures.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6599895].message }}

THK

11 years ago

From the article-

Digg received higher offers from bidders that included technology and publishing companies and start-ups but ultimately decided Betaworks had the best plan for reviving its brand

would be interesting to know what kind of offer they turned down.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600046].message }}

Mike Hlatky

11 years ago

$45 million of investor money turned into $500,000

Pretty good ROI

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600058].message }}

shg

11 years ago

Well digg was one of the very powerful site but lately naah! it was not that powerful that it use too...thats the reason its gotta go at low price compare to the previous price...

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600071].message }}

kindsvater

11 years ago

Wow. This is one of the biggest financial losers of all-time. Not often you something valued around $200,000,000 drop to $500,000 in a couple years.

Greed Kills the Pig is one of my favorite sayings.

Ya' know, whether it is $200M, or $160M, or $100M, who cares - someone would have been set for life. And they blew it.

.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Use Elf Links to Stop Google's Affiliate Bans - Brian Kindsvater IM Help

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600204].message }}

kolbywhite28

11 years ago

Originally Posted by kindsvater

Wow. This is one of the biggest financial losers of all-time. Not often you something valued around $200,000,000 drop to $500,000 in a couple years.

Greed Kills the Pig is one of my favorite sayings.

Ya' know, whether it is $200M, or $160M, or $100M, who cares - someone would have been set for life. And they blew it.

.

Surely they thought that the site had great potential to grow. Can you imagine Zuckerberg selling Facebook when it was worth $200m? He wouldn't be worth $10b today.

I think what is of more concern is how they lost popularity so quickly.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600242].message }}

yusufjaafar

11 years ago

I think it shoud add one more 'zero' into the figure... At least

$ 5,000,000

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600232].message }}

chrisck

11 years ago

Betaworks claimed they paid for 'core assets'.

And the only last piece of valuable asset left with Digg is user data, which barely covered by the 500k price.

Meaning Digg has reached its end. They're luring users into their mobile platform.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600301].message }}

Skaught27

11 years ago

I'd take $500k, but I don't think I could live knowing I turned down $200 mil!

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600323].message }}

faisalmaximus

11 years ago

Recently a lot of important and valuable sites are being sold Digg, Hostgator, Skype & ......

Thanks

Signature

GOOGLE 1st PAGE RANKING
WITH MONEY BACK GUARANTEE

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600605].message }}

xxxJamesxxx

11 years ago

I would of thought it would of sold for more.

Ah well... Goes show.

James Scholes

Thanks

Signature

FREE => How to make $688,06 a day in your underpants with ZERO investment

DISCLAIMER: Underpants not provided - must supply your own

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600651].message }}

denysapu

11 years ago

Interesting!
I do not even really understand what the the usability of Digg. Come - Digging - and leave

Thanks

Signature

Don't worry be happy!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600790].message }}

bladening

11 years ago

All started that failure relaunch

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6600997].message }}

kolbywhite28 11 years ago

Originally Posted by bladening

All started that failure relaunch

As they say, if it ain't broke, don't try to fix it.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601093].message }}

John Durham

11 years ago

A bird in hand is better than two in a bush -Moral: "Get" while the "gettin" is good, as they say.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601083].message }}

planck

11 years ago

hell my site is worth more than $500k

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601107].message }}

Joseph Then

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Alisha R

Maybe the owner of digg had some urgent need for money

Maybe he's drunk prior to selling DIGG.

Thanks

Signature

>> High Quality Solo Ads Starting From Just $22! <<

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601245].message }}

Hardik Jogi

11 years ago

Why is everyone reporting that digg is sold for $500k? It's remaining assets were sold for $500k. Total figure is $16 million

Source : Digg Sold To LinkedIn AND The Washington Post And Betaworks | TechCrunch

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

===============================================
We Build Money Making Machines - We Do The Work For You! Website Setup + Installation + Initial SEO + Articles + Social Backlinks + Web 2.0 Backlinks and many more ===============================================

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601260].message }}

Chrisbroholm

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Hardik Jogi

Why is everyone reporting that digg is sold for $500k? It's remaining assets were sold for $500k. Total figure is $16 million

Source : Digg Sold To LinkedIn AND The Washington Post And Betaworks | TechCrunch

Because that's how the news broke, that allegedly Digg had been sold for $500k. It wasn't until later that the story received some more information and one of the people involved corrected the story.

$16,000,000 isn't all bad, but compared with the 160-200 first mentioned its still low!

Thanks

Signature

Check out my blog GenuineOnlineMarketing.com where I talk about building Amazon and Adsense Niche Websites.

Over 800 Amazon Reviews for $1 - No way?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601485].message }}

sbucciarel

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Hardik Jogi

Why is everyone reporting that digg is sold for $500k? It's remaining assets were sold for $500k. Total figure is $16 million

Source : Digg Sold To LinkedIn AND The Washington Post And Betaworks | TechCrunch

Interesting. Like an old car being sold for scrap metal. Broken down and sold in bits and pieces.

Digg Dugg it's own grave a long time ago.

Elgan: Why Digg failed - Computerworld

Digg feels like it was designed by a committee with the purpose of pleasing investors. Digg is complex, arbitrary and uninviting.

Meanwhile, its social bookmarking rival, Reddit, has remained true to its purpose and mission.

Digg was created as an act of rebellion against the media elite. But it ended up being suffocated by control. You can't post this. You can't post that. If you're the wrong kind of person, or have the wrong interests, you're not welcome on Digg. Go away.

Well, we got the message.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601558].message }}

Fernando Veloso

11 years ago

Ouch...!! Even for 16 M it's a huge lose.

Thanks

Signature

People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601600].message }}

dadamson

11 years ago

Wow, what a difference.

It shows how rapidly things move online!

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

-- Free SEO Audits --

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601639].message }}

daj 11 years ago

Actually the total price of the Digg acquisition was around $16 million...
Digg Sold To LinkedIn AND The Washington Post And Betaworks | TechCrunch
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6656128].message }}

theoptionsprofessor

Banned 11 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601678].message }}

Onora Oz 11 years ago

Originally Posted by theoptionsprofessor

wow! I'll bet that was worth $10m+ 7 years ago. Things change fast online.

7 years is a pretty long period in this age of humanity. I guess

I hated whatever happened to Digg in 2010. I was an active Digg news reporter before that. All that censorship and annoying advertorials...
I haven't used it for anything other than marketing purposes since then.

Quoted from some news site:
In a statement, Betaworks said it will fold Digg into News.me, its mobile social news site. Betaworks promised to "turn Digg back into a start-up. Low budget, small team, fast cycles."
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601735].message }}

Chris Thompson

11 years ago

This article from NYT explaining the sale of Digg is missing something. I call out crappy reporting on this one (not from the OP, from the journalist).

I bet 99.999% chance that there is a huge equity component to this deal, and the cash is only a small part of it.

[ 2 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601724].message }}

cashp0wer 11 years ago

Wow - only $500,000? That is completely amazing. It was probably work much more than that a few years ago.
- Thanks
Signature
My Internet Marketing Blog - Warts And All!
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6601732].message }}

Bryan Zazz

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Calamaroo

Used to be worth as much as $160,000,000. In 2008, Google wanted it for $200,000,000!

the owner must have received an offer that he couldn't possibly refuse. Kudos for the negotiator who made the deal (just hope he/she did not have to put a horse head into the site owner's bed, just sayin...)

Thanks

Signature

wsoProto-WSO
wsoProto-app

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6602155].message }}

Scott Ames

11 years ago

I still think Groupon made a blunder by not selling for $6 billion when they had the offer. We'll have to wait and see on that one.

Thanks

Signature

Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. -Winston Churchill

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6602290].message }}

HostWind

11 years ago

While certainly appears to be a loss at least the owner(s) still made some money. Though, I cant imagine what it would feel like to go from a 200 milly offer down to just a few. Ouch.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

HostWinds
Inexpensive Web Hosting
Unlimited Web Hosting

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6602701].message }}

Walter Parrish 11 years ago

lol
I guess they should have learned the science of Rinse & Repeat. Nothing stopped them from recreating a few sites and testing to see if they could make more money from them first.

I'm curious as to why people think FB and Twitter are so large when its apparent that FB is the product of the major corporations as far as Twitter anyone that knows a little about programming can see that it's not the best code which leaves rooms for competitors to move in.

Other thing's I would be interested to find out is how many here are actually getting paying customers off the facebook? I see many plugins selling on the warrior forum, but I haven't noticed any money stats from these plugins.
- Thanks
Signature
Use Feeder Sites, Articles, And Social Media Sites To Generate Unstoppable Traffic, FREE! Click Here Now To Get It For FREE
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6655848].message }}

Weblin

11 years ago

It is sold in parts to three different companies.

Thanks

Signature

www.HandleMySite.com handles your WordPress site by doing all of the maintenance and technical work for you. Making backups, managing updates, maintenance, performance, security, SEO, etc.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6656143].message }}

Amandasimmons

11 years ago

It's just an acquisition and should not be seen as a deal of 500,0000. The owner wanted it to be given to a company that could spend millions to revive it. According to experts, it's still no less than $80 million.

To run a business, you need to have capital. Digg has got what it needed.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6658028].message }}

marketwarrior06

Banned 11 years ago

Dude its easy to say. but if you were in that place you would never sell digg too. because its generating a huge amount for you. So why should you sell it?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6658537].message }}

Walter Parrish

11 years ago

Originally Posted by marketwarrior06

Dude its easy to say. but if you were in that place you would never sell digg too. because its generating a huge amount for you. So why should you sell it?

I would definitely sell my first successful business and then like they say rinse and repeat with a different business, something bigger and better. It's basically what hinders the average business person, that Entrepreneur Mindset.

There's a ton of business that got carried out, because they didn't want to diversify, they loved doing what they liked so to speak. In fact I will go ahead and say that any business that isn't constantly changing and diversifying is destined to fail.

Take a look at the history of IBM's history. The only thing that kept them alive to date is diversifying. The held sort of a monopoly on the desktop pc for ages, but refused to put out low end models so that side of the business failed.

Thanks

Signature

Use Feeder Sites, Articles, And Social Media Sites To Generate Unstoppable Traffic, FREE! Click Here Now To Get It For FREE

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6661037].message }}

ramsfir

11 years ago

[quote=Calamaroo;6599186]Used to be worth as much as $160,000,000. In 2008, Google wanted it for $200,000,000!

Truly schocking. A lesson to be learnt from, thanks great info