EasySpin with The Best Spinner

There's no potential benefit from this.

These days, it'll probably get your site heavily penalized for "overoptimization" by Google's "Penguin update". This has already happened to large numbers of Warriors, and they've been told expressly and openly by Google that this is the reason.

This is an activity for people who don't quite appreciate how article directories work, I'm afraid. Multiple article directory submission is pointless, and without benefits. It's all explained, in great detail, in this thread: How do Article Directories work?

"Spinning" is without value, anyway. It can damage your business, but it can't help you. Everyone who actually makes a living from article marketing (rather than from supplying spinning software or services) says the same things about spinning. And there are reasons for that.

For people open-minded enough to read them, these six items explain much more, at greater length and in greater detail.

• this post explains the benefits of spinning
• the first half (or so) of this thread contains a good discussion of what you can gain from spinning articles
• the advice on this subject given by so many people throughout most of this thread has been really helpful to many people here
• on the meaning and significance of "duplicate content", in this context, this little post from expert article marketer Anne Pottinger includes direct quotations from Google's WebMaster Central Blog on the subject (not easy to find a more authoritative source than that!)
• this little article is also a very useful and accurate explanation of the subject
• this post, and its links, explain in detail the closely related subject of how article directories really work and why they exist

"Good luck with that"! It means absolutely no such thing at all. You surprise me, Kevin.

On the contrary. Cumulatively, it's very highly significant "in reality". Google knows where things were first indexed. They say so openly. It says so on their Webmaster blog. Matt Cutts says so in interviews and on videos. (You flatter me, but it isn't actually "my term" - it was widely acknowledged and discussed before I was even online at all! I have old - as well as new - SEO textbooks in which its importance is fully and clearly explained).

Nobody's claiming that having any individual article indexed on your own site first signifies that it's necessarily going to outrank any and every other subsequent copy, obviously. But in the long run, there are huge, cumulative SEO benefits from consistently acquiring and building up initial indexation-rights for your own site.

You don't need to take Cutts'/Google's/textbooks'/my word for it: it's readily verifiable and simply factual.

Also, if you want to hear more of the voice of successful experience, if you look at what a large number of experienced article marketers say in this thread, you'll see that that's one of their shared reasons for always publishing on their own sites first: http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...eza-first.html

Nobody's suggesting that it does, in any individual instance considered in isolation.

But if the same person publishes first every single week, for many months, though (i.e. exactly as successful article marketers do, on their own sites, before syndicating their articles), that's a whole different story. Important to compare like with like, don't you think?

That's why articles in the supplemental index can move into the main index, and vice-versa: there's no "big secret" about it.

You still wouldn't outrank CNN, I imagine (I've never tried). It's interesting that there's so much syndicated content on so many high-ranking international news and sports websites, though, isn't it?

It is always best to have it re-written rather than spinning as you can save a lot of time doing it yourself. this is because the end result is always worth the effort. Otherwise, there are some brilliant piece of softwares to spin articles in the WSO section which might help you out.