Feel sorry for WSO' sellers.

by 276 replies
362
Look, it's a good money spinner for a few, I get that, but the unreasonable flack SOME WSO sellers take is out of control.

I was a bit bored in between stuffing turkey down my gullet and thought I would pop into the WSO section for the first time in absolutely years.

I grabbed a handful , see what was doing the rounds nowadays, lots of rehashed stuff from years gone by but a few decent little gigs as well.

What struck me was what a dire lot SOME WSO buyers on this forum are.

Seeing people moaning that a WSO seller hadn't refunded them on Boxing day, jeez, can these people not have any break with their families?

Will your entire life dissolve without your $7 back!!!!

I read the WSO, it was basic but contained actionable information, it was white hat, it would require some work but it's based on solid foundations with a little twist the owner had developed for research using a combination of tools.

It was well put together, short but sweet to the point, no harm in that.

Yet he has to refund somebody on the basis that

"it's a good product but I won't use it so please refund me immediately"

Man, not only that , some have nagged him twice, I think one of the moans even got posted on Christmas day.

Folks moan about WSO's and often rightly so but SOME WSO customers are a joke, moaning about having to wait 24 hours over a holiday for $7 or requesting refunds because they "won't use it", why is THAT the WSO sellers fault?

People need to get a grip, it's quite clear in the description what the WSO is about , if you don't want to do video marketing why buy a WSO on video marketing. Far to many serial refunders about.

Jeez, glad I don't sell WSO's must be infuriating at times.
#main internet marketing discussion forum #feel #sellers #wso
  • It's true.

    The WSO market attracts a lot of ungreatful buyers and we as WSO creators have to take a little of the blame for that. If you keep lowering the price and raising the value expectation then this was always bound to happen. A market that is ungreatful and expect the world for nothing. Gladly though, they are the minority and there are still a LOT of greatful customers out there.

    Focus on the good as the bad come and go very quickly.

    Those complaining they haven't got a refund over the Christmas break need to get a grip on things as they clearly do not understand how a normal business operates and their expectations are unreasonable. Time those people had a reality check me thinks.
    • [ 8 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Yes, clearly it's true.

      Yes; also true.

      Over the last 4 years that I've been here, the WSO sellers, collectively, have gradually but inexorably trained their market more or less only to buy cheap stuff. And people who buy only cheap stuff are always the most demanding and unrealistic. It may be that WSO sellers have created the market they deserve. To some extent.

      Exactly so.

      I've never done a WSO and have no plans to. If I ever did, it would be very fully, openly and honestly described, and refunds would not be offered.
      • [ 8 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    They can cure that problem easily by not offering refunds. Simple.
    • [ 10 ] Thanks
    • [3] replies
    • It's good business practice to offer refunds (I think). My chats with Paypal risk department have especially re-enforced this for me. They like customers to have some form of recourse if things do not go as expected.

      The problem isn't offering the refunds, the problem is the unreasonable expectation of the buyer. The business might be more than happy to honor the refund but to not understand people are possibly having a few days off to celebrate Christmas is a bit unfair.
      • [1] reply
    • sbucciarel


      happy holidays

      truthfully your refund policy does NOT matter.

      if the product or support does NOT live up to the hype.

      I will refund absolutely.

      I spend about $5000 a year on WSO's and to be quite honest. I think I have even bought a few items from you LOL ( obviously we never had any issues so you fall in that 25%)

      but to say that there are NO REFUNDS is simply untrue.

      i would say 75% of the WSO's are terrible rehashed info. or the developers create plugins and abandon them later leaving people in a lurch.

      the other 25% have been excellent.

      I have never NOT been refunded and if I had any resistance from the seller I just go to my bank and place a charge back. simple enough


      I understand there are people that just try and get things for free and I appreciate that but I am NOT one of them so it has nothing to do with me.



      eddie
      • [5] replies
    • True, but this would go against my "inner Jay Abraham", so I would suffer the frivolous refunds in order to reap the marketing advantages of "risk reversal"; one of his favorite phrases. The problem of less sales would imo, outweigh the problem of a certain percentage of the refunds being for silly reasons, or "serial" in nature.

      I would always have a guarantee, but I think it's particularly critical if you are selling a method involving "secrets" so that people need to buy to find out the details. Why should they buy knowing that it might be something that doesn't fit them at all, and they will be stuck with the purchase regardless?
      • [2] replies
  • On My last wso a guy emailed me for a refund in the morning, by early afternoon he posted on the wso about me not responding to him etc.. I wasn't even online til that night.

    Anyways, I have many examples and it's like you said.. Some wso customers are a joke.

    I have contemplated about the no refund policy but all the books I've read on marketing and direct response marketing tell me to always have a strong refund policy so it stops me from not having one every time...
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Same thing happened to me. The most annoying thing is that the guy posted it right after I did my first bump, so my second bump didn't generate that much revenue except for a couple of extra sales. I did get my $40, but it is so annoying how some people would such a thing.

      Anyways, Happy Holidays everyone!
      • [ 2 ] Thanks

    • Maybe you could have 2 prices for the same offer. A lower price for no-refund and 25% to 50% more for refund option? The tight son's of bitches who usually ask for refunds will then have a choice.

      Airlines do this all the time with tickets, pay up to 100% more if you want the flexibility to change flights
      • [1] reply
  • You get what you pay for, however, it sounds like people want the world without paying for it. I can see offering a refund on software that isn't compatible or doesn't work, such as buying a WordPress plugin for your non-WP site, or buggy software, but providing a refund on an ebook providing money making information is kind of crazy.

    "it's a good product but I won't use it so please refund me immediately" - Anyone who says this should not be refunded in my opinion. This sounds like somebody who is searching for ideas. If you're buying WSO's for ideas then that's probably not the most cost effective way to go about things. These people should be buying WSO's because they relate to what they are currently working on and need additional ideas/methods to further their success.

    EDIT: WSO sellers have lives too and cannot work 24/7. Maybe sellers should include a disclaimer saying "please allow at least X amount of business days for refunds to be processed".
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
    • [DELETED]
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
  • I totally agree with you. I run a lot of WSO's I have over 20 running now.
    Not only is there too many serial refunders about, but I saw a HUGE
    increase in refunds 2 weeks before Christmas. Not cool !

    Customers online often treat you like a faceless nobody that "doesn't matter"
    when you run WSO's that's for sure.
    I have been on the fence about the "no refunds" policy for a while,
    but I agree with the posts above. It's not recommended and usually
    hurts your sales.

    I am considering doing a "guaranteed install" for my PHP scripts,
    so that way I am still offering a good guarantee that proves I care
    about my customers and their success using my product....
    but will no longer offer cash refunds because of the people that say
    "I'm not going to use this" and want their money back and keep my scripts.

    I also agree with the comments that the cheap product prices
    attract bitchin' and complaining more than a higer price.
    I have seen this first hand by selling a product of mine on sale.
    The people that got it for next to nothing complained and expected
    me to jump through a lot of hoops for them, where the people that
    paid full price ( a LOT more ) didn't complain at all or expect anything
    "extra" from what I offered in the WSO.

    Over-all I like doing WSO's and have success with them,
    and the good customers make it worth while. Fortunately
    there are more good then bad, however I have seen a steady
    increase in refunds. A sign of the times I suppose....
    And that's why I'm considering a new refund policy for WSO's.

    Bottom line, you're right. People need to stop expecting MORE MORE MORE,
    for LESS LESS LESS.
    But I also agree with the comments about
    " we train the customers to act this way "
    I think there is a lot of truth behind that. I'm just not sure what to do about it.

    Any suggestions ??
  • There are buyer that like to make money online but don't want to invest. They buy and they ask refund. Not all people do that, only a few.

    - Not all people appreciate knowledge --
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • It goes both ways. Some WSOs are pretty sorry.
    • [2] replies
    • It would be fair to say , everybody is more than aware of that fact.
    • Agreed ! Happened to me more than once Being a WSO seller in past, I would sympathize with sellers and on the other hand would even want them to have the integrity to reply to pm's/emails/ thread comments atleast once a day or two.. if not more . it just helps people keep faith in the biz !
      • [1] reply
  • "It's a good product but I won't use it so please refund me immediately"
    Wtf.....people expect to be refunded because of that? If you refund a person for any of those reasons listed above, you're better than me. IMO, there shouldn't be an option to refund digital books. But that's just my opinion.
  • Banned
    Don't worry. The people who are complaining about how they wasted $7 for an information product are the same people who are complaining about their spouse. Totally unthinkable.

    If the WSO doesn't offer a refund, then there is no refund. Period. You (the buyer) has to accept the seller's rules before you commit to the purchase.

    Regardless of whether there is a money back guarantee or not, I don't understand how you can ever ask for a refund (unless you didn't receive your product or got something entirely different than what you've paid for).

    Don't ask for a refund, unless it's clearly stated in the WSO sales page that there IS a refund.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      There's a lot of truth in what ExRat said and that's probably one of the reasons that I don't see much of a refund problem. Like I said, I don't publish a refund policy. That doesn't mean that I don't ever give a refund. Obviously, I won't say what criteria will get one, but not having a published one allows me to make that decision.

      I sort of design my products with "dreamer repellant" built in. Pricing, lack of claims, lack of instant glowing testimonials from people who have barely had time to download and lack of a published refund policy all go into a strategy to attract buyers who are ready for a particular product rather than just looking for the big promises of lots of moola real fast without much work involved.

      Obviously, a lot of people here make a lot more money catering to the dreamer market than I do and I'm really fine with that.

      I haven't noticed that myself. There are tons of WSOs that have negative feedback that isn't deleted. Depends on whether or not you bought the product and whether or not your remarks are fair and objective.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • There were some great WSOs on here, but the problem is that you can't weed out the bad ones. You aren't allowed to complain about them..

    This forum does bias the seller. That's why I stopped buying a couple years ago.

    If you give bad feedback your post is deleted.

    I only posted negative post a couple times in the many years here and they were deleted.

    Most other companies give the buyer more protection.

    Besides that there's a lot of good info here. I just stay away from sellers unless I know I can trust them.

    BTW I only asked for a refund once out of the many that were bad. I was denied.
    • [1] reply
    • Lambert,That's total BS. Parrot-speak, and you're way too smart for that.

      If you really believe that, do yourself a favor and examine the evidence. Go through the WSOs with 3 or more pages of comments and look to see how many negative reviews there are.

      I'll wager there are hundreds of thousands of undeleted negative comments about various products, ranging from "not thrilled" to "total scam," interspersed among the nearly 50,000 offers in the WSO section.How much 'protection' does a newspaper offer to people who buy from their classified ads? Or TV stations, when someone buys from an infomercial?

      We go to bat for customers of advertisers here more times in most weeks than a newspaper or TV station will in their entire existence.


      Paul
      • [ 12 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    @Paul

    Yeah, I've gotten to know how analytical you are when it comes to deleting comments. You won't ever delete a comment without having evidence of something.

    The person making this vague statement may see his own incident as an overall reality. It's just not true.
  • I almost didn't post this because I don't want to be "that guy," but what the hell...

    It's part of doing business in this niche and on this forum. We're all faced daily with demands on our precious time. I think you have to live by that old saw, "pick your battles." I choose not to make refund requests a time sucker.

    To each his own, but they are pretty few and far between (assuming you don't use unethical sales tactics, in which case you get what you deserve). Consider it a cost of doing business in this arena and don't lose more than 10 seconds of your time to giving them their money back.

    That's my 2 cents in the jar.
    • [ 9 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Just a quick question regarding refunds for WSO's

      If I was to do a WSO could I set up a refund policy of 60 days but you are not eligible for the refund until you have used it for 30 days. This would give the honest buyer a sense of security while at the same time discouraging most of the serial refunders.

      Al
  • If you're going to be in business for yourself, you need to be available whenever a customer wants you available, not on your schedule.

    Yes, it's pathetic that people are scum and want to get free products, especially for the price of a McDonalds meal but it's also pathetic that people continuously buy this stuff up... Including a "money back guarantee" on a $5, $7 or even $27 just ensures that your head will explode in a couple of days.

    I've seen popular WSOs with "no refund" what so ever stated in their sales pitch.

    As far as not responding in a timely manner.. hell... most people I meet on here do that when it's not a Holiday. I have a guy I haven't heard from in 2 months, one that takes days to get into Skype and respond every time we communicate, and so on... When you're in business for yourself, you need to be available when your clients and your customers want you available. If you can't make that promise or sacrifice, go get a 9-5 job with a sympathetic boss.
    • [3] replies
    • Maybe in your business model, not mine.
      • [ 9 ] Thanks
    • I disagree. It is my life, my time, my schedule. Period. I would never let a customer control my life.

      Unless the product advertises that it comes with support offered certain periods of time, support is not guaranteed. I once had someone complain they didn't get support on Christmas. They went to the bottom of the support list and I told them they were lucky to still be on the list.

      If you let customers run you ragged with unreasonable, time-consuming demands (and to later refund), you probably won't be in business for long.

      .
      • [ 13 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Like hell. Call your plumber up at 3 am and tell him you want him to come on YOUR schedule and not his. Or try that with your auto mechanic.
      • [ 8 ] Thanks
  • Also noticed a strange rise in refund requests starting right before Christmas (even one that had made a purchase in July!).
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply

    • Yup. Same here only I noticed it 2 weeks before christmas.
      One person did a chargeback for software I sold him 5 months ago !
      It was $147.00 which is no small chargeback. Worst part was
      I spent HOURS with this guy on skype and email TELLING him
      exactly what to do for his online business, which is way above
      and beyond what my sales letter promised.

      My sales letter was for the software and I made no promises or
      even hints that I would personally come spend each day with him
      live on skype until he was a successful internet marketer.
      However, he ended up expecting me to "make him rich" and replace
      his $250,000.000 a year income he "gave up" to start blindly internet marketing without any experience.

      I gave this guy HUGE help and even got his first clickbank sale ever FOR him.
      How does he repay me ? Doesn't do anything or contact me for 4 months,
      then suddenly before Christmas a "chargeback" of $147.00 ripped out of
      my paypal account to satisfy his credit card company complaint he filed.
      Claiming he was "not satisfied" with my software and service.

      His expectations were that high that he felt it's ok to just steal from
      me at Christmas time because I'm a faceless person on the internet,
      and he came from a $250,000.00 per year job.

      I think a lot of the really hard-case refunders/non-payers that
      want blood for nothing come from despiration.
      I often find it's "loss of job" or "coming from a job that had big income
      for little work" such as high level government jobs, and real estate.
      These people are used to having a big income,
      and their world they have created around themselves requires that high income.
      So they get very desperate and pushy when it comes to getting into any
      IM related work. They have a "make me rich now please" attitude, but
      quickly drop the "please" part. They don't understand you have to work
      your ass off to get ahead in this business, just like any land based/offline business.
      They want the dream without the work.

      That being said I do think stronger sales copy with less hype is required
      to bring things back to a fair level of expectations out there.
      I know that my personal copy writing skills suck. I'm a PHP developer,
      not a sales-man. I just learned how to sell by force, because otherwise
      I would not have any customers. lol. :p
      I am going to start working on my copywrite skills for 2013.
      That's my new year's resolution. I hope to be able to make more sales
      with less expectations in the future.

      But don't forget, some people are just a bit crazy and hate life.
      So of course they're going to hate your WSO too !

      cheers
      • [1] reply
  • I really don't feel sorry for WSO sellers at all. I have an e-commerce business and returns are just a fact of life. When a person is unhappy with a product, they're often very demanding and unreasonable. That's just the way it is.

    Since I've been a member on this forum, I have purchased two or three WSOs. When I bought them, I knew upfront that the great possibility was they were worthless. Unfortunately for me, they were. They were worthless primarily because they offered techniques that were either unethical or borderline illegal, that is, spamming or breaking terms of service of several major companies.

    No, I didn't ask for a refund. I knew going in I would likely be disappointed.

    These days, I rarely read any of the WSOS. Part of me, is intrigued by new members who tout WSOs, because many of them really have never had much success in Internet marketing. Yet, they make themselves instant experts and promise grand schemes packed with promises of big money. They stuff them on these hideous looking so-called squeeze pages, which are pure drudgery to read. In fact, it's hard to imagine how one could spend so much time and use so many words to say so very little.

    What really amazes me about many of the WSOs I've seen, is the basic fact they offer no real business other than hustling the next guy into making a purchase. They never offer any real products or services, only promises and visions of grandeur that would never be offered for $7.

    So, once again, I really don't feel sorry for someone who gets a nasty refunder on their latest WSO. It's just part of the game.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • IMHO I think this is a multi-factorial problem.

    1) Unreasonable customer expectations fuelled by overblown copy. Problem is that everyone who writes sales copy (myself included) knows that the hypey, overblown, emotionally driven, copy sells - simple as that!

    So, do you cut the emotionally driven copy, and know that you'll sell much less, or do you include the hype copy and know that you'll sell more. With emotionally driven copy comes bigger expectations (e.g. the "5 click web business"????) and hence bigger disappointments, and as a result more extreme reactions from those disappointed customers! This is simple 101 psychology.

    2) The anonymity of the internet makes it so much easier for certain customers to request refunds (and to even be really, really nasty while they do it). These people would probably not be so "in your face" if they had to ring you on the phone, or indeed come to your shop in person to request a refund.

    They simply feel "safe" asking for an anonymous refund - especially on sites like Clickbank where they don't have to contact the vendor at all. Easy refunds mean more refunds. Why are we surprised by this?

    One question. Have you ever tried to send something back to Amazon?

    3) I agree that the WSO market and the Clickbank market have been trained to refund! I'm led to believe that Clickbank now has refund rates of up to 30% - 40% depending on the product! When you compare this to high street stores this is an appalling refund rate. It has little to do with the products, and so much more to do with the market.

    4) As sellers we have made this rod for our own backs by continually devaluing our products. You know what I'm talking about! The "$5,750 value product for only $7" type of product, or the "$15,000 worth of bonuses for FREE!" Please, give me a break!!!! Does anyone actually believe this any more?

    No one in their right minds in real business would even consider selling like this. That's because hard products have a "real" value i.e. they take a certain amount of cash to produce and distribute. Digital products are of course different.

    5 ) We have commoditised our digital products and have embraced the "less is more" strategy - i.e. If we sell "X" at $97 then if we reduce the price to $7 then we will surely sell so much more! This is a flawed strategy. How many multi national businesses have gone out of business working on this pricing model?

    I agree with those who say we should create more value and better quality, and then charge more rather than less. BUT there are lazy marketers out there who still believe they can sell nothing for something, and who still think it's OK to take a tired, old, stale, PLR ebook and charge $67 for it. Is it any wonder the market gets jaded?

    I work in other markets selling digital products and have a zero refund rate. I also work in other markets where I don't offer a refund at all, and have never had any complaints in several years of doing business!

    The vast majority of online buyers are not refund orientated BUT we have trained OUR market to be that way. We as internet marketers in the "make money / biz op" (call it what you will) market have customers that will pay ridiculous amounts of money for our products. That's what makes it such a lucrative market to be in!

    The flip side is that we have to put up with those who call us on our refund guarantee. maybe this is the payoff for having a mass market of rabid buyers, who don't mind spending millions of dollars every year.
    • [ 4 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • excellent post. thanks !
      I agree about clickbank. Trained to refund. I was going to stop
      using them this year, but with the new "tier" system rolling out in January,
      I might stick around and see how it turns out.

      cheers
  • Glad to see this discussion, I hope it results in some serious thinking and maybe even some action!

    I can see the points of folks here about hypeyness. One poster referred back to the OP stating that's not the problem here, it was the buyer's unreasonable expectations or basically just wanting to get the product for free because he can.

    I think you're both right, and for different reasons. It's not just a matter of that particular sales page, product or copy. It's also a result of the SPACE that we're in.

    We exist in a space where, no matter what your ad copy says, everywhere you look we have a STANDARD BEING SET. People's expectations are being set by what we "collectively" advertise.

    So even though your products are based on realistic strategies, all around you are other carnival barkers shouting "We will do it all for you! Just pay $10 and we will make you a millionaire while you're at the bar or out fishing! You don't have to do anything!"

    It's as if, were we to throw away our brains for a second, we're in a world where all you need to do is go put in a few shifts at McDonalds and BANG; you buy our product and you're set for life. Hell even at $97 a week or something equally outrageous, what's it matter? You're going to be getting checks and deposits of thousands every single day and all you have to do is collect the cash!

    Obviously this is silly, but it's a reality. There's no reason to expect anything different when the precedent we set in this industry is that if we just find the right product, system or guru we can become millionaires in a few months for the cost of a night out on the town. And with each purchase that doesn't live up to it's hype, I think most people are going to go one of 3 ways. 1) Most common: Give up "This is just a network of scams and ripoff artists." 2) Next most common: Just get the money back and try something else. "Well, that wasn't the right thing for me or I couldn't figure it out, but hey look at this, this looks promising..." 3) least common: Be skeptical of everything you see, research the topics and don't spend any money on anything that sounds even slightly "Too good to be true".

    I don't think there's an easy solution to any of this. Certainly not the advice of one poster "Just don't offer refunds then." Do that, and you'll lose even MORE money. (Funny how huge this space is and yet so many vendors and marketers have zero understanding of the credit card chargeback process. There are fees you know. Your buyer will get the money back. If you give it back willingly then you only lose what they paid you. Fight it and you'll lose their money and a bunch of your own as well.)
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Good points, well made.
    • Banned
      I don't lose money by not offering refunds. I would lose money by offering refunds from all the freebie seekers who think it would be simple to just download websites and then request a refund.

      It is not at all unusual for those who sell software and websites to NOT offer a refund, and as for chargebacks, you are aware that most people on WF use Paypal rather than credit cards, are you not?

      As I mentioned, on the rare occasion that someone files a Paypal dispute (which is NOT the same thing as a chargeback), I escalate it to a claim and normally win the dispute by providing the proof that they ordered the digital product and downloaded the digital product.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [3] replies
  • it can be annoying at times when someone emails you saying

    "hey, i went through your product it's really good and solid but i really don't have time to use it at the moment so could i have a refund please"

    lol, some people do actually say this

    however that being said the serial refunders only amount to about 0.01% of people that buy your products

    yes it can be annoying at times but the pro's of doing wso's far far far out way the con's

    for getting say 300 buyers on your list you may get a few serial refunders and a few awkward customers but apart from that you are left with 290 good customers

    i can live with that :-)
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply

    • haha.. Paul, I've had that exact email. I love your product, but I don;t have time. I always issue a refund immediately, regardless.. but no time is a pretty lame excuse IMHO

      However, I will say, I've hardly ever had any refunds so, it doesn't seem to be much of a problem IMHO.
  • I never offer refunds on a WSO. If someone wants a guarantee
    then they can buy at the normal price and then ask for the refund.

    And only once in the many years I was asked for a refund on a WSO
    and the excuse was "good, but I won't use it" as well. So this seems
    to be a common "nice" way of asking for a refund.

    But again in my 10 years of selling online I've NEVER had a complaint
    about the quality of products I sell. In fact, I've had the opposite
    complaint customers said I should be charging more. That's the
    way I want it to be.

    -Ray Edwards
    • [ 6 ] Thanks
  • I have been a buyer of WSOs for over a year now, and I have never once asked for a refund.

    Why?

    Because I figure it's all a part of my education. I managed to learn all about a ton of different methods and then choose the one that I wanted to focus on. Sure there were a few duds in there, but most of the products I purchased were pretty decent. I stopped purchasing recently because I was getting product after product that said exactly the same thing. Once that happens it is time to stop educating yourself through reading and start educating yourself through acting (if you aren't already).

    Oddly enough, the two products that I have acted on were not WSOs. I paid 20 for one and 500 for the other. I've also gotten more actionable advice from the War Room. That was $37 well spent.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I have a simple solution for the constant threads (good or bad) posted about the Warrior Special Offers section of this forum:
      • If you don't like the products and the way they are sold in that section don't go there.
      • If you don't want to sell your product for cheap and endure the refund requests and complaints don't go there.
      • If you think that sales hype is a problem in that section don't go there.
      If you do visit that section and see something you something against the rules hit the "report" button and let the moderators know. It's that simple.

      Bonnie
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • I hear ya man.

    I've considered throwing my hat into the ring with a WSO...but am a bit reluctant for the reasons that you mentioned.

    Actually, it's been a blessing in disguise because I just turn my WSOs into blog posts...which probably bring me more money in the long-run anyway.
  • I have yet to make my own WSOs, so this is coming from someone who has been on the consumer side of things. I've bought LOTS of WSOs. Some Great, some okay and some that suck. I've only asked for a refund 3 times out of over 100 WSO purchases. As a WSO consumer I have some advice for product developers from a customer's perspective...

    I would recommend first and foremost, please state what your products do in clear English. The blind copy, hype and total exaggerations of many WSOs lead to buyer’s remorse. The expectations are high but most products fail to deliver on their claims.

    Another problem I see a lot is how many sellers promise lifetime upgrades and support for their products. Then a month or 2 later they've abandoned the product entirely having moved on to other products and offering no upgrades and or support as promised, then they wonder why they get trashed in threads of future launches. It's called karma!

    I know in the IM market truth in advertising is rare. Those who are serious about quality should be very upfront and forthright when describing their products. If there are OTOs then state it in the ad copy and how much they are as well as how they complement the original offering. There are way too many games played. It’s similar to going to a car dealer and finding out after the sale the engine and transmission are additional.

    I also agree there are far too many products that are obviously rehashed garbage and that's why it's being sold at rock bottom pricing or it’s a very high level gloss over of a method(s) without much detail or information.

    The bottom line is, product developers should start treating IM like any other business. State on your sales pages the actual offer and state it clearly. Leave the hype and BS out. If there are additional features and products that either compliment or enhance the original product then state it in the ad copy upfront.

    Nothing pisses me off more than buying a product for $X.00 only to find out after the initial sale, that usually for a lot more than the original offer, if I want the product to do what was advertised or better then I have to shell out even more money. And products with more than one OTO are the worst and make me want a refund because I feel duped.

    Next, I wouldn’t offer a refund if the buyer, after being informed of all the necessary information on the product so as to make an intelligent buying decision, must show proof they actually applied the strategy or used the product as described before given a refund.

    Also charge accordingly for your product. I see far too many offers making all kinds of money claims being sold for $1 to $19. Come on people, we all know anything that sounds too good to be true usually is. Any product that is a true business solution is not going to sell that cheaply. It also drags the perceived value of other worthwhile products down.

    The only exception to the above should be, if you are launching a product and need testers and or testimonials then fine, discount it as such but explain that as a condition in the sales letter. Also charging a fair price for a fair product or service is an incentive for the product creator to offer stellar support as well as upgrades and fixes in exchange for testing and testimonials.

    Additionally I would recommend, making it worthwhile for the product creator to offer good support, and continued development of the product, especially on software, to charge a sufficient price. Only offer minor feature enhancements and fixes until there is a new full version release. Just like any other software company does. It’s unrealistic to expect a business to keep offering upgrades and support for free for life. Again, if it’s sounds too good to be true it usually is.

    I think a lot of WSO buyers have unreal expectations of low prices, high quality products and free lifelong development and support of products, which is ridiculous for anything of reasonably good quality. This I blame on the less than honest product creators who are in it for the quick buck.

    So to sum it up…

    Be truthful in ad copy.
    If there’s an OTO state it upfront and what it is, does and what it costs.
    Produce quality products.
    Charge a reasonable price.
    Provide good support.
    Don’t over promise and under deliver.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • This, times 10.
  • I would have to agree completely. Certain offers and products attract a certain type of buyer. I myself have had dealings with some very bad mannered customers after they asked for a refund without providing me with any information about the transaction so I could actually refund the correct person.
  • Also, here's a couple great Mark Cuban quotes.

    • [2] replies
    • Yes, you did.

      If you run a retail store, you are not going to go into the shop in the middle of the night, just because someone calls you at 3 AM wanting to replace a product. The other side is that you can't just abandon your customers if you promise any kind of service at all.

      Like so many things, it all comes down to balance.


      Paul
      • [ 12 ] Thanks
    • I do WSO's through Clickbank..

      Sure, that opens me up to their '60 day' refund policy, but if I make sure my product is of high quality, then refunds don't end up being a big issue.

      I also don't have to contend with the WSO Pro and PayPal's liking for terminating account as soon as they see a surge in deposits.
  • I bought 4. Two of the four looked like they were slapped together in one night, with grammatical and spelling errors abounding.

    One had more up-selling of the OTO in it than actual helpful content.

    You go to the author's home page or blog and find it under construction, or bare-- having three posts and no comments, yet the author is lauded as a "famed expert in his field" by suppurating reviewers.

    You really feel conned.

    That's why people refund.

    And btw, I didn't request any refunds. But I sure as hell won't make the WSO mistake again .
    • [1] reply
    • That's exactly why so many people back away from buying WSO's, because so many of the products are just pathetic.

      That then makes it's so much harder for other members who have a valuable product to offer to be taken seriously.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I bought so many things and almost never asked for a refund. It's really stupid for asking a refund on a product which is 7-10$. In most cases i asked for a refund if it's a total SCAM, otherwise i don't. Most products are not so good, but hey they are below 10$. If we stick for those "10$" we are f**ked!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Yes I have noticed some people are just window shoppers.

    I have gotten this several times :

    Hey thanks for calling me and installing the software for me and spending an hour and a half on the phone with me explaining everything and making sure I understand how your software works but I decided that I dont have time to do this right now so I want a refund, please send me a refund right now, oh and by the way I didnt include my transaction ID in this email because I want to make it as difficult as possible for you to refund me but if you dont do it right away Im going to file a paypal complain for not as described even though it does work exactly as described, but I just 'assumed' your script was a WordPress plug in even though you never even mentioned WordPress. So thanks!

    Obviously I didnt get that email literately but I have gotten a few 'like' it. Most of my buyers are good people, but there are some out there who abuse the refund policy. Ill gladly give anyone a refund if the script does not work as expected. But when someone says 'It works great, I just changed my mind; it kind of urks me. Especially when I spend an hour on the phone with them helping them out.
    • [1] reply
    • Most of the people buy, then share it to blackhat forums and then ask for a refund especially the ebooks and courses. Same goes for the softwares, the buy, share them and other people try to null them and then they ask for a refund!
  • People selling hopes and dreams to people wanting to win the lottery of life will find the odd angry person ready to pizzle your day off as they bang on the door of unhappiness and life is not fair. In many ways it would be expected so not sure why when it happens people get upset.
  • Banned
    I buy WSO based on the following.

    1. Genuine reviews...not fake ones.
    2. Reputation of Seller.
    3. Is the WSO going to help my business?
    4. Support
    5. Refund Policy
  • I buy a lot of WSO's and asked about 2- 3 times for a refund cuz it was

    - a crap
    - not as advertised at the sales page
    - software didn't worked (that refund never arrived tough)

    Now outside the WF. We sell our CB product to "normal" people around the planet, individuals and small biz customers.

    One asked a refund because she couldn't copy and paste here password and username into the login box (after trying for 3 days, forgot to ask if she is blond)...

    Another one wasn't able to install the Abobe Flash Player...

    Third asked for refund at day 61 after purchase (sorry, I forgot to send you the refund request yesterday)....

    and you know what, we refunded EVERYONE without even arguing.

    It's just not worth your time to discuss with people which are on that level, believe me.

    Be kind, give the refund and focus on selling.

    G.
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    Just imagine if ALL WSO sellers re-trained their buyers to accept no refunds as part of the process of getting a deal on something, i.e.; all sales are final.

    Sure, you're going to get a few PayPal disputes and charge backs, but not nearly as many as you might think. You're also going to lose sales, but that's a good thing - the lost sales are almost always the tire kickers, the serial refunders, etc., that you don't want anyways.

    I've run a no-refund model for years on both scripts/software and the occasional info product with no major loss as a result. Every time I re-test it, I get slammed with tire kickers or worse, who normally aren't regular customers anyways.

    Keep in mind that having a stated no-refund policy doesn't mean that, as the seller, you can't make a decision to refund those who have legitimate issues. We do refund under specific circumstances, but our policy allows us to decide that - not an unreasonable customer.

    Personally, I'd love to see the WSO forum move away from any interaction at all - like Paul's newspaper analogy, change it so you can't comment on the ads or give feedback publicly in the same media. Let the buyers and sellers deal with the issues off-forum like real business people and real customers.

    If nothing else, it gives some overworked mods a much needed break
    • [ 8 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • thanks Big Mike. You have just inspired me to have a no-refund policy
      on my PHP scripts so I can concentrate on my good customers
      I was afraid to try it, but after reading your post here,
      and having plenty of experience myself with "tire kickers"......
      I'm ready to give it a whirl.


      cheers
  • For sellers, I think you need to take the good with the bad. There's tremendous upside to selling on the forum, but it's a public forum and you never know who's going to come on your thread, who's going to buy, and how they're going to act. It's all part the game.

    To some extent, I can empathize with the increasing amount of buyer frustration (not the irrational crazy people) the 'normal' people that all they want is what's advertised.

    Since I promote software, plugins, etc. people generally know what they're buying. So it makes it easier to some extent.

    The quality of info products seems to be on a steady decline and has been for the past 6-8 months.

    I'm amazed that more sellers don't fight back and defend their product on the thread but honestly, most products now are designed specifically to sell on the forum. It's a fairy tail written down in order to make quick cash.

    I didn't say ALL, but enough to make it look bad.

    When you know what's really going on and 'how the sausage is made', it becomes painfully obvious.

    Many people think if you run a WSO, you're going to make money. The reality is, most fail to sell 10-25+ copies.

    There's Facebook groups dedicated to selling WSO's filled with 1,000+ people. When you go in there, the vast majority don't have the experience or skills to create an info product. But they're seeking to strike it rich in the WSO section... like scratching off a lottery ticket. And this is spurred on by other members, people offering coaching, and those that encourage them to stay positive and get that product out there. (even if that product is garbage)

    In the 'old days' it was simple. You have a product, list it in the WSO section, it cost $20 to bump, your listing lasted on the first page for 24-36 hours. It was profitable from organic Warrior traffic.

    Now, you need affiliates to drive traffic. If you don't currently have a list or can attract affiliates, your offer is essentially dead in the water because the marketplace is crowded (unless you're active out here, promote your sig, and drive traffic yourself).

    To get the affiliates, sometimes the product suffers. One of the elements to attracting affiliates is a funnel with at least one OTO. Some sellers will 'thin out' the frontend just for the sake of offering an OTO. Add in some hype, a sales page that converts, 100% commissions on the frontend, chances are you'll have success.

    But the buyer suffers when things like this happen. Frustrated people will not only lash out on that sellers thread, but carry an attitude into any other offer they see/buy.

    Yes, there are people out there that buy and demand the world from you. But not everyone who refunds is a 'serial refunder'. There are sellers that have no business selling and irrational buyers that shouldn't be buying.

    It is what it is when it comes to WSO's... it takes balls to sell on this forum.
    • [ 4 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I totally Agree Mark. I was going to bring that up but in a different way.
      I remember back in the day when it was $20 for a WSO bump.
      It was doubled to $40 to try and clean up the WSO section from
      "crap" offers. It didn't work. What happened is everyone that runs WSO's
      ends up needing to double the hype in order to make a profit.

      I remember having several WSO's that made me about $30 - $40 on
      average every bump. That was fine when it was $20 for a bump,
      because I made a small profit, and got those people on my list.
      I could sell them my other products and almost always did.

      Now with a WSO being $40 those small profit margins are gone.
      No one can work for free, so vendors end up doubling the hype
      and doing a harder sell just to break even or make that small
      profit that used to be much easier. How much easier ?
      I would say 50% easier back in the day when a WSO was half
      the cost of what it is now.

      I think this was a big factor in the decline of honesty in sales
      copy and of course that creates a snow-ball effect. The buyer
      ends up expecting more because of the hype, and the vendor
      works twice as hard now to sell to an already angry audience.

      I vote we go back to $20 per bump in the WSO section.
      Less for the Warrior Forum ? I doubt it. With more successful
      vendors, happier customers buying more often, and less hype
      in the sales copy to break even I would say there would be
      more offers running in no time.

      Or perhaps go up in the initial listing price, and down on the bump ?
      Like $80 to list a new WSO, but $20 to bump ?
      That would weed out a LOT of crap REALLY fast.
      No crap offer could stand a chance, but some one like
      myself that is willing to invest in my business and already
      pay $100 for WF banner ads would be fine with it.

      It would create a marketplace where only really good products
      can handle the $80 listing fee. With less competition that offer
      now stands a better chance of making sales, and stays on page one
      much longer. The $20 bumps would allow a good vendor to recoup
      from the $80 listing fee over time. This would cut down on crap offers,
      hyped sales copy, keep offers on page 1 longer, and create a marketplace
      where the buyers are generally more happy.
      Which means more sales and less refunds for vendors.

      Just my 2 cents.
      • [1] reply
  • I feel like I have to add my 2 cents here coz I have myself come across a WSO which "I wont use" and hence requested for a refund.

    Now there are many reasons one wont "use" a WSO -
    1. You are lazy
    2. You dont have time
    3. You wanna be a mean ass to the seller
    4. You are dumb

    My reason was that the WSO was black hat - something that could put my (and others who implement it) account/reputation/IP at a huge risk by breaking copyright laws across the globe. Hence I WONT use it. I didnt want to put that in the WSO thread coz being a WSO seller myself, I dont want to ruin someone's reputation . So I said it as politely as possible on his thread. I feel it's only fair to be nice to sellers while ensuring they keep up to their part of the deal. Win win for all !
  • The sale of digital goods on here is ungoverned and has no protection or sense of trade rules for the buyer or seller. The distribution of digital goods on the web is generally like this anyway. There's so much crap being sold that peoples demands on sellers are higher. You sell on a black market, you have no real reason to complain about black market buyers. Open a shop on the high street if you want protection from moaning buyers.
  • There is simply not enough organic traffic on the WSO section now and far too many trolls
  • I have found that by telling them in the refund policy that if after applied it doesn't work I will gladly refund them their money. I am no authority with only 150 sales, but not a single refund request. Seems simple enough.
  • And you should also agree that those buyers who ask for the refund, don't even bother to read the full WSO sales page and the description. Most of them just click it on 'Buy Now' and think, they will become millionaire after clicking that 'Buy now' button only! But when they actually get the WSO, they realize (although I have doubt on this!) it is not possible to become a millionaire just by clicking a button.

    And that is very annoying!
  • You know you're successful and you're doing something right when you're pissing people off. Look up any of the top brand name IM gurus and look up reviews on them. People get angry as hell when they purchase things and it doesn't turn out to be an instant solution to all the world's problems.

    Musicians/Actors get death threats all the time just because some people don't like their work.

    People are insane. It doesn't matter what you do, not everyone's going to like you or like what you do. On the other side of what you said, a lot of people hire people from the "Looking To Hire" section of the forum specifically for the purpose of creating positive comments.

    If people are really surprised that people in business for themselves are dirty and low down, you should really see how corporations work on the inside, it'll make your jaw drop how careless and dirty they get for the slightest reason or benefit.
  • While it's somewhat off topic, I would like to see categories in the WSO Section, save people wading through all the "SEO" experts.

    Nothing absurd, no need to categorize to death but something like:

    SEO Services.
    Graphic Design
    Coding Services
    CPA /PPC / Media Buying .
    Scripts / Wordpress Plugins
    Coaching Programs and 1 on 1
    Offline Promotions
    Social Media Services

    That kind of thing.

    I think that would help folks see what they need more clearly.

    I would still suggest a "view all" for those that enjoy wading through the mayhem.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • You mean true and professional SEO is going to cost me more than $67 a month? lol :rolleyes:

      Categories is a bad idea. Isn't this what Digital Point did and then the traffic/earnings for these products sank slightly? I remember selling eBooks and they sold like hot cakes. However, as soon as they changed it around, the sales dropped by a very considerably sized number.

      Also, you forgot the "Get Rich Quick" category.

      Product marketers for categories that didn't get a lot of views would be discouraged from posting there. Having a forum where thousands of people at any given moment and sometimes over ten thousand people is the best ideal situation for product marketers and the forum administrator.
  • Those seem at best vague guesses and this isn't DP.

    My bet is those with decent products in their respective categories would favor not being thrown in with every other non relevant wso's. They would have a far greater chance of actually being noticed in the sea of crazy that is the current WSO section.

    Not only that, the people looking in those sections would be people specifically looking for that kind of information, so more targeted, less window shoppers , more serious purchases.. perhaps, admittedly guess work but educated guess work at that.

    There's a reason almost any selling platform e-commerce solution has categories and doesn't lump every single product type into one category alone.

    Those who prefer window shopping the lot can use "view all. " mode.

    There's no real downside and plenty if organisational upside.

    I'm willing to wager folks would release decent wso content at sane prices if they were not all lumped in with low rent crud, they would actually stand a chance of people seeing the thing for all the effort they put in.

    From my perspective I would rather have my WSO I'm a category of 10 products than 500 anyway, even if it potentially had less views. The negatives to my mind don't come close to outweighing the positives.
    • [1] reply

    • Hi,

      I do not like to have more categories of forums, as it starts feeling lonely in sub-forums

      But i really like your idea, as this will really separate the stuff in relevant categories,
      what about having Official TAGS for specific types..and any Warrior Can easily Sort WSO's
      using those tags... and only ONE TAG allowed per WSO to define its category like it is in W4H section...


      I see so many Warriors interested in graphics and software products, but as a seller of WP plugin which I worked for months to prefect, I see it is kinda a hard to get attention without all those money making claims in the thread title and wso copy.


      Regards,
      Mohsin
  • Its unfortunate, but refunds have become a part of the im niche.
  • I must be an anomaly on WF.

    I have bought quite a number of WSOs in the last few years. Some excellent, some good, some a waste of time for me. I have never refunded a WSO because 9 out of 10 times I have learned something that made the $7 - $15 worthwhile. I don't seriously expect a $10 WSO to solve all my problems. What I do expect is that I will learn a new skill, a new piece of knowledge, that will fit in to the IM knowledge I am accumulating by hanging around here. If I don't learn anything valuable then I don't buy from that person again. Easy.

    Each WSO has been a learning experience for me and I am happy with that and I salute WF for providing this service.
    • [ 4 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Excellent points Dailybread.

      I've said the same thing many times myself whenever a WSO rant was started.

      Now I just sit back and watch what happens, the dust settles and a good time is had by all.

  • Some WSO-s are trash, and some WSO buyers are dishonest. Decent people need protection from both. Why not work out a special WF refund policy? Let's imagine a system where refunds are paid out only if a specific percentage of buyers demand it. Let's say... 20%.

    If 20% of buyers ask their money back then WSO is clearly not worth much, and it's fair enough that they got refunded. But, if only a few people ask for a refund and all others are satisfied with the product, then we can be sure that it's quality is OK and no refund is justified.

    I think one other big problem that WSO sellers currently have would be solved by implementing such a system. Black hat forums distribute pirated WSO-s. I'm absolutely sure they make part of refunds. If they cannot get it any more, new WSO-s stop appearing in their forums, and as a result WSO sellers can make more money.
  • This thread is all over the shop now but in regards the pricing issue.

    I would say this.

    I don't want to see some poor guy / gal who's poured their heart and soul into their first WSO get lumbered with a $500 fee to get it listed.

    Over the years folks have got started in the WSO section, and gone on to make fantastic products , yet had not a dime to rub together to start with.

    However..

    If somebody is allowed to make a claim in a WSO which is akin to

    "I make $5000.00 per month using this easy technique in just 2 hours a day" or similar.

    Then those people should have ZERO issue stumping up 10% of this easy 2 hours a day revenue to list their amazing magical cash generating WSO.

    If the product is that good, and it's so easy and their making $60k per annum doing it in just 2 hours a day, why would 10% of the supposed monthly earnings be a big deal?

    I don't want to see all WSO's have huge barriers to entry, it doesn't make sense, many WSO's aren't promising huge revenue, they are offering services or concepts or aren't even directly revenue related.

    But those promising the earth and stipulating huge revenue claims should have no problem putting their money where their mouth is.

    It may also stop the all to common occurrence of seeing people with a WSO claiming how many thousands of bucks they make every day, then being seen for example, in the copy writing section asking if somebody could do the work for free/cheap because they don't any funds.

    The WSO section would be a lot better off in charlatans had a barrier to entry on offers which promise the world, when clearly these people arn't making a dam penny and they just regurgitated an existing concept and wrapped it in their own re-written text and shiny new PDF.

    These are the worst for sucking the newbies in.
    • [1] reply
    • Hi,

      Here's a much simpler solution (in my opinion) than all of these conflicting and continual suggestions for changes to the WSO section.

      Let the market forces do their work - because they always do anyway and any changes will only slightly affect market forces temporarily - they're unlikely to actually interfere with them in any meaningful way in the long term.

      It's a marketplace and it's open for business, that's all that really matters, so get stuck in with your best shots and show the lame ducks how it's done.

      No matter what the finer dynamics and rules are, if your stuff is absolutely revolutionary, unique and mind-blowingly awesome it will sell well enough at virtually any price and gain massive word of mouth traction, whatever the reviews and all of that other nonsense because more than likely it will be surrounded by over-hyped junk in a marketplace full of people completely desperate to throw good money at revolutionary, unique and mind-blowingly awesome products/ideas.

      Do that right and you should be able to work the market to your advantage regardless of the rules and regs, which (in my opinion) is a much better idea than trying to tweak the rules to suit/please/accommodate everyone and every imaginable variable. Do the latter too much and you start picking up the bad habits of bureaucracies - those are for useless parasites, not innovative wealth creators.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Hey there -

    Here's a serious question for you - can I have your baby?

    Great post ;-)

    Tim
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I already found somebody in the Warriors to hire section Tim, we're very happy but thanks for the offer :-)
  • It doesn't take much to realize that everybody is flocking online to make some money. Relying on traditional money making activities is very much a struggle in order to make ends meet. The internet has now become the place where people are seeking that golden solution to their financial troubles and commitments.

    Most people today are awash with credit card debt, mortgage burdens and auto loans. In addition to this people have to contend with taking care of feeding, educating and taking care of their families health needs. Traditional employees are now embracing becoming online entrepreneurs in a quest to reach that level of financial security.

    With hundreds of thousands of individuals rushing online today, opportunities are abound. Many new programs and businesses are starting up in order to get a slice of this pie. Programs from MLM, HYIPS, Cash Gifting to Betting programs are attempting to lure that massive surge of people online.

    Unfortunately, many people are not getting their needs met and end up losing money.

    On the other hand their are those few that would bitch if they were buried in a gold coffin and would not know a good thing if it slapped them in the face

    I have bought numerous WSO,s from this forum and have found that the content of the venders here is much better for the price than most any other sales platform , "bar none".

    I believe that most of the time you get what you pay for, and so ,When you come here to be educated be prepared to pay the price .

    Most people know this but there will always be the few that are lazy and want everything handed to them for nothing with "NO WORK" .

    I predict that the refund issue will continue to digress as our society becomes more socialist in "Free" giveaway programming .

    I always try to remember that there are two different kinds of people in the world.

    There are GIVERS and there are TAKERS ,Which are YOU ?
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • OK guy's, you convinced me, reviewing WSO's is impossible so let's forget this.

    It's just sad to see a place go in a direction we certainly don't want. But I believe that you agree that a improvement would be a nice thing to have.

    So how's about having a sellers rating system (maybe with stars) like a seller rating at Fiverr or similar?

    Could be for each WSO or for the seller in generall for who run's several WSO's.

    Buyers will get the possibility to rate the WSO they purchased and/or the seller anonymously on a scale from 1 - 5 (or something similar) which will be shown in the thread.

    Guess products and support will improve with this.

    That would also be difficult to be influenced by the WSO affiliates which post many times a great review just so his list will go to the WSO and see he purchased it.

    Would that be possible to implement?

    G.
    • [3] replies
    • We've also had debates over this type of idea before and it was also deemed fairly worthless. Any type of rating system could too easily be manipulated just like the people on eBay who buy hundreds of $1 recipes just to artificially inflate their positive feedback score.

      People would pay others to buy and vote for their product just like people buy Facebook likes and Tweets. It's too easy manipulated and thus it wouldn't be a very good indicator of anything.

      I honestly think the fairest way is to just leave things how they are now. Those who release shitty products get found out very quickly and they disappear. Those who put out good products stand strong and continue to put out good products.

      Do I think things could be improved somehow, sure. But how? I don't think things are 100% perfect the way they are but I don't think we are actually doing too badly as a community. We as a community attracted a lot of the rubbish that comes to this forum but thankfully we as a community are also very quick to uncover those people when they do arrive here.

      It seems to me the main people who complain about WSO's are those who buy a lot of them. Those people need to educate themselves on what they should and should not be buying and they need to take more responsibility for their buying actions. If someone is selling a product promising to make you a millionaire for $7, well, I can't really feel sorry for the people who buy it. There has to be some common sense involved in the process and that responsibility needs to fall on the customers taking the money out of their wallet.

      The customers also need to keep in mind that if they continue to buy the WSO's with the wild and ridiculous income claims then they are only feeding the problem and encouraging more people to put out similar products. So the buyers are actually part of this problem as well and need to take some of the responsibility.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • You're starting to ask the right kinds of questions.

      Possible? Yes, but with some significant technical challenges. Still, those aren't insurmountable.

      Does it serve the desired purpose better than some other system? In this case, I don't think so. Here's why...

      There is a natural progression to WSOs. The first page or two is usually taken up by comments from reviewers, early adopters, and questions from prospective customers. Assuming you set it up in a way that restricted rating access to paying customers (one of the technical challenges, given that we don't handle the transactions), those early customers would be the ones who set the first rating. And they tend to be the ones most likely to give enthusiastic ratings.

      So, it often looks better at the start than the majority of people will end up judging it to be. But that is when the less experienced people are most likely to buy: When it has a high rating.

      That rating would serve as a shortcut for many customers. They'd skip reading the actual reviews which could provide valuable context, and which evolve as people actually use the product and experience the related customer service.

      It would also seem likely to create an unbalanced trend toward negative text reviews. People who really liked it might just give it 4 or 5 stars and say nothing. People with problems would be more likely to use the star system and to post negative comments. That's not certain, but it's how I would expect it to trend.

      That gives rise to another problem: If there's any disparity between an anonymous rating and the text-based comments, you may be certain that folks who don't think any deeper than "Anyone who thinks differently than me must have an agenda" would scream that we were "fixing" the ratings.

      Apparent, but logically sensible, discrepancies like I described above would give a lot of people reason to believe those mistaken claims.

      Despite mountains of easily available evidence to the contrary, people still believe that we delete negative reviews of products. How much easier will it be to believe that we were rigging a rating system that could show two different (and accurately represented) attitudes at the same time?

      Could this sort of system be easily gamed? Also yes.

      As it stands now, people can post thoughtful and contextually meaningful reviews. Those are far more valuable than "1-star, 2-stars, 3-stars, 4."

      It takes more work to read and consider the reviews. That is the only thing a star-based review system would obviate. And it's the worst possible outcome of such a change.

      It may look to you like we're just dismissing your suggestions out of hand, but you need to realize that we've seen these same suggestions hundreds of times. We've thought about them in depth, and looked at aspects of them most people never have need to consider.

      Could we be wrong? Sure. That's always possible. But the small potential upside isn't worth the near-certain, and very large, downside.


      Paul
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Think it through. As someone who has advertised in the Warriors for Hire section numerous times, I have found that there are a bunch of ass monkeys there who instantly give your thread a 1 star rating when you launch a product that competes with theirs.

      The problem was pervasive enough that it appears that Allen removed the rating feature from Warriors for Hire. All those systems can be gamed and will be gamed.

      Your comparison to retail stores and WF ... well, Walmart sells China junk mostly. Most people know it and expect it and buy it anyway because it's cheap. They don't picket Walmart and whine to the media when their little thingy breaks. They just go back and buy more junk.

      You want to blame the WF for lack of quality control and the sellers for marketing to a group of people who have a clear interest in what they're peddling, but not the buyer?

      How about people stop being a sucker for a hyped up sales page and start using their heads before making purchasing decisions? Geeesh ... from the time that I was a little kid, my mothers' favorite saying (one of them) was if it sounds too good to be true, it is.

      If people want to believe something bad enough, (and the dreamers do want to believe that you can make money fast with no skills in your pajamas), you won't convince them that it just isn't so. You see it here all the time. People start threads like "how can I make a lot of money real fast"? A lot of Warriors chime in .... you can't and go on to explain that if you want long term success, you need a plan and to put a lot of work in to make it happen. Well, they ignore that and shuffle off back to the WSO forum looking for that magic bullet that they know exists. They get burned not just one time, not two times, not even three times ... but over and over again and they still buy.

      People who keep doing the same thing over and over and expect different results defy all logic. Obviously, in a perfect world, sellers would just concentrate on producing really dynamite products and not resort to trickery, false claims, fake testimonials, fake screenshots, etc. ....but guess what? That's not going to happen. Period.

      Given that there will always be a marketplace with some percentage of dodgy sellers, what is the solution?

      Get a clue for one. If you get burned, figure out why that happened. If you have unrealistic expectations, I guarantee you that someone will tell you that they can meet or exceed them.

      Duh ... If something hurts, stop doing it. Should be obvious, right? Why do you keep looking for magic bullets when you get burned over and over again?

      Use your head. Can these people really deliver what they say in the sales letter? Common sense should tell you that a huge income claims or incredible results for a $7 "method" are highly unlikely. If it sounds too good to be true, it most likely isn't true.

      Lastly ... if you the buyer, the dreamer did not buy, the market would disappear. It's the Law of Supply and Demand. Want the supply to dry up, eliminate the demand. Know that in order to build a sustainable, long term income online, you will have to work hard, learn new skills and make your own plan. The information is here and initially, it's free. There's more than enough help and information in this forum to get you started in the right direction.

      Once you have that plan and are implementing it, you'll probably find that there are some excellent products being sold here that can enhance your business and make your job easier or give you the knowledge that you need to take it to the next level. That's what you should be looking for and buying.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • Just to re-enforce the mentality of a lot of the people selling products in the WSO forum, I would like to quote this question someone just asked in the main discussion forum:

    The sad thing is this is probably the mentality of the average WSO vendor nowadays. They don't care about creating quality products. A lot of them only care about making a quick buck with as little a work as possible. The blind leading the blind. It's up to us, together, to stomp these people out of our community.

    Now granted this person might actually be looking for software to create a salespage or the like, but I guarantee you this mentality exists amongst some of the sellers. They would love a software program that spat out cheap and worthless WSO products they could sell.
  • Will,

    Thanks man, I'll get right on it.

    George Wright
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Haha

      Wanna go 50/50? I need those people on my list...
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
  • You are absolutely right!

    and those people before they buy the wso , they will keep asking hundreds of questions to the seller and then; they decide to buy it after 10 minutes or less they will ask for refund!

    That's why I have decided not refund my wsos as long as I am answering all the questions said by buyers before they buy it!


    Thanks for the thread, it was really great topic to be discussed

    Kindest Regards
    Samah
  • Great thread by the way. The conduct of some buyers I've seen recently has been absolutely scandalous; just simple things like not using a support email that has been clearly given in the FAQ or sales letter and posting in the thread really isn't acceptable.

    I like the look of some "take action" guarantees I've seen; so it might be a 30 day guarantee, but you can only request a refund after 14 days to prove you've taken action.
  • I always try to ask the sellers as many question that I can about the product just to avoid asking a refund,although some of them are ignoring messeges or saying somthing general like "it might work for you,see for yourself".
    I hate asking for refunds,it takes time.
  • What about just setting a "minimum price" level for all WSO's ?
    no more $7 products ! ? Make the minimum you can sell a WSO $25
    That would get rid of any junk, and good offers would stand strong.

    I've paid over $25 for GOOD ebooks and been more than happy with
    my purchase. Perhaps this would be the best and most simple solution.
    What do you think warriors ?

    cheers


    Jeff
    • [2] replies
    • Jeff,There is no way I can see Allen going for any rule that tries to exert that kind of control over the marketing decisions of a seller.

      Barring something I can't even imagine at the moment, that is a complete non-starter.


      Paul
    • Banned
      I remember when people said increasing the price to $40 would eliminate the junk. Obviously, it didn't. The price isn't the problem and an advertising platform shouldn't really be telling people how to price their products, IMO.

      I've bought junk that costs way more than $7 and I've bought gems for $7 that makes me wonder why in the world they are selling that so cheap.

      There's already an excellent feedback system in place via the comments. Do people read every last one of them? I do, but I rather suspect that many just react to their emotional triggers and hit that buy button right away because by gosh ... it says they're going to get rich in 48 hours and they want to get started on that. Due diligence be damned.
  • What about having a minimum post count before you're allowed to launch a WSO ?
    we have a minimum post count for sending PMs, why not make people get to
    know the forum a bit, meet some people, and prove they care about communicating
    with others before they're allowed to launch a WSO ?

    That would not limit any one to a rating system or change in price structure.
    It would just mean that people have to prove that they are a real person that
    wants to communicate and learn about how this forum works a bit before they
    can slap up any old crap offer.
    Perhaps 100 posts ?

    what do you think warriors ?


    Jeff
    • [2] replies
    • Banned

      That's actually the only idea I've seen floated about that I could support, although as in most systems, it would be gamed by the poster posting a bunch of crap real fast to meet the criteria.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Jeff,I would personally be in favor of that, but it's one of those "easy to game" things. A minimum post count and a specific membership duration would work a bit better.

      I don't see that happening, though, and I'm not sure enough that my opinion is right to even debate the point. I have a preference, but it's not anything close to the level of a conviction.

      And it would not solve anything.


      Paul
  • Well the refund terms must be very clear. Otherwise it's not customer's fault if they want a refund in accordance to their way.

    Thanks to this thread, I'm putting up my refund T&C.
  • Blacklist them immediately.

    People are always looking for ways to get things 'for free'.

    I even got PMs of someone saying he had a very big list and if he could get a review copy. LOL.
  • i use the blacklist feature on JvZoo, espically for prople who put paypal disuptes in.

    If some askes for a refund via my support desk, they get one within 48hrs. I they are too dumb or lazy to use the support desk, then I don't want them as a customer.
  • [DELETED]
  • On some other forums I visit with sales sections similar to the WSO one people have to be a member for a certain amount of time (60-90 days), have a certain number of 'quality' posts and no warnings to post a classified ad / offer / service. This obviously deters a lot of people who are up to no good or out to scam.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • So glad someone finally posted about this! I've read so many WSO threads and launched a few WSO's myself and some of these WSO buyers blow my mind!! I've seen some of the same crazy refund requests and comments on the WSO threads. Angry Warriors who have not even purchased the product yet asking about OTO's, if there is a 24x7 help desk, and getting rude and upset if the WSO seller doesn not respond within 5 minutes, etc.... FOR A $7 PURCHASE!! *ugh* I had never seen anything like it before Warrior Forum. It really is unbelievable to me. It's $7!! And then there are the refunders. Oh, the refunders. I've seen and even received messages like... "I've downloaded everything and decided that it wasn't for me, please refund". We have a WSO currently that is nearly 5GB is content and we have received refund requests just like that! So, you mean to tell me that you've managed to download ALL 5GB of the content (videos, PLR, ebooks, plugins, etc) to your hard drive and NOW you've decided that it may not be for you?!?!? Yeah. It gives me an ulcer. Sometimes, these buyers are worse than Clickbank buyers, which we all know is "Land of the Free". So many of these products/offers could easily sell for hundreds, if not thousands, elsewhere. :/

    Warriors.... do all of us WSO sellers a favor - If you buy something, and it really is a good product and you received what you were promised (or even more), don't be scammer! Part with your $7 happily and apply the info and knowledge from the WSO to make some $$$, instead of thinking how you can get something for free.

    OP - thanks so much for bringing up this subject, as I think it really is a sore spot for many WSO sellers and should be addressed. I don't think these buyers realize how their actions may easily taint the WSO market and Warrior Forum, as a whole.
    • [1] reply
    • Hi Brains Gone Wild,

      Your post sums up most of what I have been trying to explain, but I don't mean that in a good way, sorry.

      You've gone into great detail about how these buyers 'give you an ulcer' and other things.

      You say -

      And THAT is exactly the point. If you haven't seen this before then I can't believe you've been selling many info products in many places for much time, yet you sell a product for $12 as a classified ad here teaching how to make 5 figures with WSOs!

      I saw this kind of bad behaviour from buyers that you are referring to as soon as I started selling info products on the internet a decade ago. Where? On eBay.

      And guess what they had - a feedback/rating system. It made no difference. I had a buyer going postal on me over a $1 or $2 product, claiming to be the OWNER of eBay and threatening to sue me and put me out of business.

      Unfortunately for him, his username was something like 'Jason23071984' so I pointed out to him that he was still in school when eBay was launched. He asked me how I knew, I told him, he apologised and cleared off. I could tell you 1000 stories like that.

      The point is this - this thread is full of people with strong opinions about what needs changing, but many of them are quite new to all of this.

      Yet there are others in the thread, in particular Paul (who has been a moderator here since Medieval times) who has probably seen threads like this once every three weeks and I know from the amount of times I have seen them that nearly every post suggesting/demanding changes is almost a carbon copy of the posts that have appeared in all of those other threads about the WSO section and each time the arguments have been blown to pieces with logical reasoning.

      Secondly, I had a quick peek at your Warrior classified ad.

      Ready to launch your own WSO? Grab the WSO-in-a-Box first

      The whole pitch is about you being an elderly grandma and how you made $10k with your first WSO, and the implication throughout is that if someone is to spend the $12 to buy the product they can do the same - yet this is a resell rights product, you didn't even write it yourself.

      It says you made $10k with your first WSO, and Derrick Van Dyke - who created the product you're selling apparently made $70k with this product.

      There is some misleading stuff on your salespage such as 'offer only available to members of Warrior Forum.' How are you stopping non members from buying this?

      Do you not see the irony of your post combined with your Warrior classified ad? I do. You are selling a product designed and sold on the basis that others can sell WSOs and make five figures on their first one too just by spending $12 and learning from the product (which is a resell rights product). Then you moan that the buyers are a nightmare!

      Do you not think that some of these nightmare buyers may have become that way due to encountering nightmare sellers who don't know what they are doing, for example the new people who buy your product and think that they will earn $10k right out of the gate with their first WSO?

      .......

      Reply to all - that classified ads section is confusing. Do the WSO rules apply in there or does it have it's own rules? If so, where are they? Can you sell resell rights products in there which you didn't create yourself? That section is under 'Warrior Special Offers' in the breadcrumb trail which is even more confusing and bearing in mind the person I am replying to has a product all about selling 'WSOs' in there, it gets even more confusing. I actually thought I was in the WSO section reading that ad and I bet others do too - which isn't a good thing, in my opinion.
      • [ 5 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Recently I have been covering a friends first WSO thread because his wife went into early labor and just delivered their first baby (she had previously miscarried so it was iffy to say the least)...

    This WSO was a pretty decent software for what it was desigend to do and his customer service is great. I informed his customers that he would be out of the thread for a few days (and explained why) and most of his customers were quite understanding...except one...

    This jerk had the nerve to ask for a refund because he had joined a beta group for a similar product shortly after purchasing the WSO and said he no longer needed the one he purchased. He never said it didnt work, never said he was unhappy with it...simply that he didnt need it since he was beta testing a competitors product (then went on to name the product in the thred...which I reported). Seriously now, how frikin cheap is that? That guy made my black list instantly! What a jerk!

    The problem with not offering refunds (and trust me Ive thought of it) is that PP prefers you give the customer options (even if some customers take advantage of that fact)...
  • [DELETED]
    • [2] replies
    • I've been a copywriter and marketing consultant for 12
      years now, and have probably worked with close to
      500 clients now.

      And I can say this without a doubt and with 100%
      certainty:

      The lower your price is, or the closer your product
      or service is to $0... the more problems you will
      have with those people.

      In almost every single case... those people who
      paid $200 to $300 for copy, they were bigger
      problems and headaches than those who paid $5,000
      to $10,000.

      I've had clients who have paid me $5,000 to write copy
      and were the very best clients I've had.

      I've had others pay $200 for a squeeze page, and literally
      created more headaches than what it was worth.

      I just think it's an attraction thing... you tend to attract
      better quality customers with higher prices. You get what
      you pay for.

      That's why on the WSOs I have, they are ALL $500 and more
      and never less than $500. It always seems that the lower your
      prices, the more headaches you'll get.

      I've now seen it as a small business owner and internet
      marketer as well as a copywriter. Clients who pay me
      thousands and thousands of dollars are some of my
      longest running clients and relationships.

      Those that pay $200, some have been the worst experience
      ever.

      So, my advice is to start charging a lot more and you'll
      tend to attract clients who value your information more.
      • [ 7 ] Thanks
    • Really; who believes you can "create a utopia by rules and regulations"?

      Nobody I've ever spoken to. It's a straw man. The reason for regulations, which after all, is another word for laws, is simple; without laws, you can't have a civil society; you have lawlessness, or the law of the jungle. We have them because we must; life as we know it would break down quickly without them.

      Obviously there are bad ones, though judging which ones are bad is a matter of one's point of view, but any halfway reasonable point of view would have to admit that, while we might each feel certain laws are bad, the basic need to have laws is beyond obvious, and it has nothing to do with any silly fantasy about utopia. It has to do with preventing the human race from devolving to the point where the law of the jungle prevails over the rule of law.
  • I haven't had a refund problem yet, but I've only had one WSO so far with limited sales, ranging from $17 to Free as of now (lol). Just testing the waters really....

    But I have a 30-day, no questions asked refund policy. I've studied too much Jay Abraham not to offer at least that.
  • I'm not complaining any more then anyone else here.
    I'm just trying to help come up with a good idea.
    I don't depend on window shoppers, or I would have given up
    on WSO's a long time ago. I'm just putting in my 2 cents like everyone else.

    Everyone here is very interested in getting their opinion out.
    But I don't see any one here doing much except saying how other's ideas won't work.
    True, some of them are flawed, and some are very flawed.
    But we need to stop arguing who's idea is better and why, and just
    try some good ideas out. If it works good, if it doesn't no harm done.

    It's good that we're talking about it, except we're all just trying validate
    our own opinions. I think we should just try some ideas out and see how it goes.

    We have all agreed that a 100 post count restriction and a 3 ( or more even )
    month account restriction would "maybe" help. Why not try it and see ?
    As another person posted earier, other forums are doing exactly that, and
    it works for them. No one here seemed to be opposed to the idea either.

    We restrict PM's until you've had a 50 post count, this would be no different.
    Add the 3+ month membership restriction and that should make "a dent"
    which will matter.

    I'm not saying it's a perfect idea without flaws, but it could work and has been
    proven to work on other sites. So why not give it a whirl ?

    Anyways, I'm just really interested in this subject because I do run WSO's myself
    and I am glad that we are all talking about this. Like Paul said, it's nice to see
    everyone keeping things happy on this thread and no one is getting "mean"
    which is nice to see for a change.

    Perhaps this thread will result in some changes that can affect us all in a positive way.

    cheers
    Jeff
    • [3] replies
    • Jeff,Excuse me?

      There is a significant difference between "Not doing what I want" and "Doing nothing." It is a useful distinction with which to become familiar.

      We have explained why these ideas are unlikely to be implemented. And I can assure you, the reasons are not imagined.

      We used to have rules, for example, about how many posts you had to have and how long you had to be a member before you could post a WSO. The percentage of offers that were problems was probably the same then as it is now. "Small, but consistent."

      We have a lot of people in this thread who regularly report problems they see with various kinds of posts, including commercial offers. We have multiple current and former moderators in the thread, who spend time and energy handling issues that come up. Lots of people in the discussion do things every day to help keep the forum clean and running.

      The only time I ever see reports from you is when something happens in your sales thread that you don't like.

      Before you pick up a stone, Jeff, you may want to consider whether it's yours to throw.


      Paul
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • Banned
      Probably because many, if not all of the suggestions made, have been tried and failed or previously decided to be unfeasible for technical reasons or basic manageability.

      I'm one of the former mods in this thread that Paul mentioned - I guarantee you that any day I'm in here posting, I'm also reporting threads regularly. While no longer a mod (my choice), I believe strongly in the "Everyone's a Moderator" philosophy, which is what makes this community work so well.

      Far too often, sellers focus on recommending WSO rules that will only benefit themselves, by positioning their offers better according to unique rules - and by creating unreasonable barriers to entry for newcomers.

      For example, why stop at a 100 post count restriction? Why not make it 1000? Oops - then you couldn't run WSO's, right? Why not make it 5000? That clears all almost all but the longest-term members - sweet...I could get into that.

      Why stop at three months? Let's make it a year...no, wait - let's make it five years with a 5K post requirement. That pretty much ensures any WSO I decide to run stays on page one forever

      When's the last time you saw similar requirements to advertise products and services in other media?

      Believe it or not, suggestions made by members have been implemented over the years, but they're not done arbitrarily and without thinking them through in view of the bigger picture. While your suggestion might not be used, it doesn't mean you're not being listened to or nothing is being done.

      As I mentioned in an earlier post, this forum has evolved considerably in the eight years I've been a member of it. Far more has been done that you'd ever know unless you'd been here and been through it.
      • [ 4 ] Thanks
    • Jeff do you think it is possible for YOU to follow WSO rules and stop PM me to offer me a bribe if I leave you a review on your currently running WSO?

      That would be greatly appreciated.
      • [1] reply
  • hey Paul,
    I don't complain, I just keep to myself. I was just trying to help.
    I'm not casting any stones, I was saying it's nice we can all discuss this.
    I just felt some people don't want to try ideas out. That's all.
    Have a great day !

    Jeff
  • To further my point and the original point of this entire thread... our experience has been: no issues with the classified offer in terms of chronic refunders, buyer-scammers, etc.. -VS- most of our WSO's almost always having at least a few of the ridiculous refund requests. Here's my point... if a buyer legitimately is not satisfied with the purchase, of course they should receive a refund. If a buyer downloads all content and bonuses and then says something like "Just not really for me", or "Just wasn't that overwhelmed" - that is ridiculous, IMO. I even had one last week request a refund because they were having difficulty downloading a free, UNADVERTISED bonus that I included. THAT is what I'm talking about. My fingers are crossed that these types of buyers are very much a small percentage and not trending.
  • Just treat it as an usual mild risk.
  • I have to agree with the OP. People really need to get a grip .

    But just like Paul said " The concepts of balance and personal responsibility are completely foreign to these folk."

    Some of them act like 8 year old kids. I had a guy who LEFT A POSITIVE REVIEW first and after a few days came to me and asked for a refund...

    Why you ask? "I am too old to make a video my eyes hurt" lol.

    I ignored the request. After a few HOURS, he came to the thread and trashed it with Negative comments lol.. (after leaving his positive review )

    Guess what? I refunded him not because I wanted more sales (had sold over 850 already), just coz I DIDN't want to waste a wee bit more energy on that topic for someone who couldn't live without his $7.21.

    End of the story. It happens because This is a Forum with exactly 585,527 members as of now. I recommend you do self hosted launches if you got the resources (you-know-what) and create a [Reviewers-Wanted] thread and take a screenshot of those reviews and put it in the sales page for Social Proof .

    As long as you are on a forum... you will face this. Remember, you should control your biz and life n not your customers .

    My 3 cents .
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Not sure why fellow WSO sellers are crying over 2% refund rates lol...

    A small fraction of people are just going to rip you off.

    But having a guarantee dramatically boosts profits.

    So it's worth having not only an unconditional guarantee, but a ballsy one.

    The benefits far outweigh having to deal with a few scammers.

    Whenever you get some crazy butthead scammer, just refund, blacklist, buh bye, move on.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      No, it doesn't.

      It most certainly didn't make me want to put up with the paypal disputes. A lot of people find it easier to click a few buttons in paypal then email and ask for a refund.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • Look. I'm done here. Sick of being insulted by someone who doesn't even understand basic direct marketing.

    If you want to leave money on the table, go for it.

    But I just wanted other members here to know that they shouldn't be listening to this misinformation.
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      No one called you any names.

      Why don't I understand direct marketing?

      I had a guarantee and tested without one. No difference in profits but now you say I have no clue? haha

      You have never even tested this scenario but tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

      I completely understand risk reversal. That is why I had a guarantee in the first place. It didn't substantially boost profits like you said. I probably lost money supporting refunders.

      Hell, you never even tested it so how do you know if it substantially boosts profits?
      • [1] reply

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 362

    Look, it's a good money spinner for a few, I get that, but the unreasonable flack SOME WSO sellers take is out of control. I was a bit bored in between stuffing turkey down my gullet and thought I would pop into the WSO section for the first time in absolutely years.