Landing Page Confusion

18 replies
Greetings,

I have a question about utilizing different domains for the sake of landing pages. For example, if I have (domain1.com) which is the main domain, is it safe to build a landing page on lets say.. (domain1florida.com), or (domain1georgia.com), but the only thing thats different about these other 2 domains is the landing page?

Thanks,
Josh
#confusion #landing #landing page #page
  • Profile picture of the author NatesMarketing
    I am kind of confused by your question. If I understand it correctly I would use subdomains:
    - florida.domain1.com
    - georga.domain1.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743222].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seocognition
      Originally Posted by NatesMarketing View Post

      I am kind of confused by your question. If I understand it correctly I would use subdomains:
      - florida.domain1.com
      - georga.domain1.com
      I'm confused by asking it Sorry.

      I'm more specifically talking about this domain: http://southcarolinaatm.com/. But when you click on any link in the top menu there, if you look closely it takes you to this domain: http://www.carolinaatm.com/.

      I'm wanting to interlink another batch of simular sites in the same manner, but didn't know if this was considered spammy in the eyes of Google.

      I hope this makes more sense.

      Thanks,
      Josh
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743272].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author higherluv
        Originally Posted by seocognition View Post

        I'm confused by asking it Sorry.

        I'm more specifically talking about this domain: South Carolina ATM | Mobile ATM | Event ATM | Portable ATM | ATM Rentals. But when you click on any link in the top menu there, if you look closely it takes you to this domain: ATM Company | ATM Machines | ATM Placement | Carolina ATM | ATM Processing | Mobile ATM.

        I'm wanting to interlink another batch of simular sites in the same manner, but didn't know if this was considered spammy in the eyes of Google.

        I hope this makes more sense.

        Thanks,
        Josh
        I don't think you will have a problem provided that you're doing your best to drive traffic to those other similar sites. I.e., statedomain1.com.

        A little bit a side but related question: you have a south carolina website linking to a carolina website. In addition to north carolina, what other sites were you considering?? I'm a little confused... :confused: (see?)
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743411].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Istvan Horvath
          Originally Posted by higherluv View Post

          A little bit a side but related question: you have a south carolina website linking to a carolina website. In addition to north carolina, what other sites were you considering?? I'm a little confused... :confused: (see?)
          It is not HIS site... it is the "model" he wants to copy.

          For a "seo expert" it's a rather not-so-wise plan: having the same content on different domain names (i.e. the same content on many websites you own!) doesn't sound as a good plan.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743445].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seocognition
            Originally Posted by Istvan Horvath View Post

            It is not HIS site... it is the "model" he wants to copy.

            For a "seo expert" it's a rather not-so-wise plan: having the same content on different domain names (i.e. the same content on many websites you own!) doesn't sound as a good plan.
            I don't plan on having the same content.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743458].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Istvan Horvath
              Originally Posted by seocognition View Post

              I don't plan on having the same content.
              Actually, according to your OP... you do!

              Originally Posted by seocognition View Post

              For example, if I have (domain1.com) which is the main domain, is it safe to build a landing page on lets say.. (domain1florida.com), or (domain1georgia.com), but the only thing thats different about these other 2 domains is the landing page?
              Translated: everything else is the same on those domains, except the landing page. Didn't you just said that? :rolleyes:
              Signature

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743480].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seocognition
                Originally Posted by Istvan Horvath View Post

                Actually, according to your OP... you do!



                Translated: everything else is the same on those domains, except the landing page. Didn't you just said that? :rolleyes:
                Greetings,

                I'm sorry, I may have not explained it exactly.

                If website A ONLY has (1) link (which is the landing page of itself), all the other links that go to website B are outbound from site A. So therefore all the content would and should be considered unique.

                I'm kinda thinking this out as I go along. If I'm missing something, I don't mind being corrected!

                Thanks
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743587].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Istvan Horvath
                  Originally Posted by seocognition View Post

                  I'm sorry, I may have not explained it exactly.

                  If website A ONLY has (1) link (which is the landing page of itself), all the other links that go to website B are outbound from site A. So therefore all the content would and should be considered unique.
                  No, you haven't. And it's just getting worse and worse

                  Website A in your scenario has NO link that points to any of its own pages/folders. Period. It has one page: the landing page. A one-page website is not its own link (sounds like the snake biting its own tail...)

                  A few years ago there was a very popular scam on the world wide web: it looked like a genuine news site and if you arrived to it as a visitor if displayed 'welcome to the Springfield, MO fantastic news site' while for me it would have been 'welcome to the Waterdown, ON fantastic news site'
                  ... then it urged you to get a trial something for $1 - and after the short trial period it charged everybody $40-50-100/mo... and it was f*cking difficult to cancel those subscriptions.

                  Well, the site you linked to as an example, reminded me exactly of those scams
                  Signature

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743666].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author seocognition
                    Originally Posted by Istvan Horvath View Post

                    No, you haven't. And it's just getting worse and worse

                    Website A in your scenario has NO link that points to any of its own pages/folders. Period. It has one page: the landing page. A one-page website is not its own link (sounds like the snake biting its own tail...)

                    A few years ago there was a very popular scam on the world wide web: it looked like a genuine news site and if you arrived to it as a visitor if displayed 'welcome to the Springfield, MO fantastic news site' while for me it would have been 'welcome to the Waterdown, ON fantastic news site'
                    ... then it urged you to get a trial something for $1 - and after the short trial period it charged everybody $40-50-100/mo... and it was f*cking difficult to cancel those subscriptions.

                    Well, the site you linked to as an example, reminded me exactly of those scams
                    You are majoring on minors here.

                    Say there is one main company that has many site files and folders. It's the mother ship if you will.

                    If you create landing pages (on multiple domains), and then place the same links in the menus of all those multiple landing pages that link back to the mother sites pages, you are not creating duplicate content.

                    Please correct me if I'm wrong....
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743802].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author seocognition
                    Well any advice?
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7747465].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seocognition
          Originally Posted by higherluv View Post

          I don't think you will have a problem provided that you're doing your best to drive traffic to those other similar sites. I.e., statedomain1.com.

          A little bit a side but related question: you have a south carolina website linking to a carolina website. In addition to north carolina, what other sites were you considering?? I'm a little confused... :confused: (see?)
          This specific setup isn't mine, but it's a model for something that I am looking to do within the same niche and different set of websites.

          The fear of creating this setup (for me) is the fact that the sites look identical without the viewer knowing that they are jumping from domain to domain (unless they see the URL or logo changes).

          So essentially it's a smart way to have a "catch all" solution ONLY if these are not considered spammy or black hat techniques.

          I personally see it as an effective move, but will Google see it that way?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743451].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author higherluv
            Originally Posted by seocognition View Post

            This specific setup isn't mine, but it's a model for something that I am looking to do within the same niche and different set of websites.

            The fear of creating this setup (for me) is the fact that the sites look identical without the viewer knowing that they are jumping from domain to domain (unless they see the URL or logo changes).

            So essentially it's a smart way to have a "catch all" solution ONLY if these are not considered spammy or black hat techniques.

            I personally see it as an effective move, but will Google see it that way?
            I see - no Google won't see it like that. Google's biggest pet peeve is sites that have duplicate content (multiple pages of the exact same content in the same site). Your plan doesn't seem to be that way - a) it's different sites, and b) different content compared with the site you're linking to and hopefully different from site to site.

            If you do your best to promote those "minisites" (that's what I'll call them ) legitimately, and all your sites are interesting enough to stay on without a horribly high bounce rate then I believe you shouldn't have a problem.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743489].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author seocognition
              Originally Posted by higherluv View Post

              I see - no Google won't see it like that. Google's biggest pet peeve is sites that have duplicate content (multiple pages of the exact same content in the same site). Your plan doesn't seem to be that way - a) it's different sites, and b) different content compared with the site you're linking to and hopefully different from site to site.

              If you do your best to promote those "minisites" (that's what I'll call them ) legitimately, and all your sites are interesting enough to stay on without a horribly high bounce rate then I believe you shouldn't have a problem.
              This is kinda what I thought. I think they would be considered safe, but the reason I had red flags about this idea is because of the "sneaky" URL change. I don't think it would be different than a sub domain quite honestly. They are both inadvertently performing the same process I think...
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7743819].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author onSubie
    Yes you can this.

    No it won't help SEO or your rankings

    If it looks like traffic satellites funneling traffic back to the mothership then Google may crush you like they did BMW.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7748147].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seocognition
      This explains it exactly. It seems like a really smart concept. So is this what happened to BMW?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7754810].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author onSubie
        Originally Posted by seocognition View Post

        This explains it exactly. It seems like a really smart concept. So is this what happened to BMW?

        BMW was using "doorway" sites to trick Google into sending traffic for all sorts of keywords.

        When Google realized these doorway sites were gaming the system and did not relate to the content of the end destination (BMW), they reduced the main BMW site to PR0 and de-indexed all the feeder sites.

        "BMW's German website, which is heavily reliant on javascript code unsearchable by Google, used text-heavy pages liberally sprinkled with key words to attract the attention of Google's indexing system.

        However, once a user clicked on the link displayed in Google's results window, they were redirected to a regular BMW Germany page, which contained far fewer of the key words."

        BBC NEWS | Technology | BMW given Google 'death penalty'
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7755197].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seocognition
          Originally Posted by onSubie View Post

          BMW was using "doorway" sites to trick Google into sending traffic for all sorts of keywords.

          When Google realized these doorway sites were gaming the system and did not relate to the content of the end destination (BMW), they reduced the main BMW site to PR0 and de-indexed all the feeder sites.

          "BMW's German website, which is heavily reliant on javascript code unsearchable by Google, used text-heavy pages liberally sprinkled with key words to attract the attention of Google's indexing system.

          However, once a user clicked on the link displayed in Google's results window, they were redirected to a regular BMW Germany page, which contained far fewer of the key words."

          BBC NEWS | Technology | BMW given Google 'death penalty'
          Thanks so much for your reply. This is interesting. What I'm doing is a bit different than that of BMW I presume.

          I think the only issue could be the menu links (on each of the landing pages) that will always go to the main home page to the mother site. My plan is to (nofollow noindex) them. All Google should see is the single landing pages.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7758765].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author redexclub
    Website A's landing page will be something like this: landingpage.websiteA.com (IDeal)

    websiteB.com can be a single website or a landing page of Website B

    Two domains means Two Sites!!

    search engine will not count website b for website a or website a for website b. When you will show information of website b to website a (throw any link or something) ..it will be fair but a lot of outbound links could be spam.

    Be careful
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7748259].message }}

Trending Topics