Free articles spinner tools?

Actually - NO. The Google Panda algorithm update specifically addressed the deluge of crappy spun articles that, at the time were swamping the internet. Article spinners are absolutely NOT the way to go.

I hate spinners, but if I were to choose one, it certainly wouldn't be a free one. I've tried out the free ones, just to see how much they would butcher an article. WOW, just wow. The spun article was unrecognizable, and I don't mean in a good, "hey, this is unique" sort of way.

I mean a "is this even English...?" sort of unrecognizable.

Never use spinners. If you really, REALLY like using them, then don't use free ones.

If your English is bad or you have no time to write then get it written for you, or have your site in your own language.

If your English is not good a spinner will be useless to you because you will not know if the substituted words are in the right context, nor will you be able correct the grammar, sorry dude you are on a loser.

Still no idea why spinners have such a split, i.e don't use them, google hates it etc or use them and we love them.

Like any tool, its as good as the user, give a monkey the latest mac and he will still use it like a commdo 64. Let me explain.

The assumption that most people make when talking about spinners is, a readable article is inserted into the spinner, you press one button and out comes an article which is unique but is no use to the end user or for rankings.

how many of you guys ever used a spinner using the Manuel function. i.e you go though each sentence and change it manually with the suggestions the spinner offers.

you get a 80% unique article that reads well, also while doing this you add your own 2 cent into the article giving it a better feel.

now the question do I do this?

not any more, I used to and it gave me decent results. now I just use o desk and get what I pay for i.e if your going to pay $5 for 300 words what kind of 300 words do you think your going to get.

one rule that I try to stick to , money site = decent, readable articles and yeah they don't need to be unique, just credit the site where you got it from. p.s any site that has 20,000 incoming links and 0 out bound links apart from internal anchors looks very natural.

I would suggest unless your doing mass publication using, a blog network (yes all the major players have been shut down, but the guys that are cleaver have their own), or magic submitter/sick submitter do not use a spinner. be creative, or pay someone to be creative for you.

p.s magic submitter works a treat if you know how to use spin text in the write format.

I used TBS before and have no problems with them, but now I have someone to manually rewrite articles as with the google panda change they are now particular with the content. I don't want my sites to suffer in the end.

spinning articles..... i wont really encourage it

No - they're useless, and far more likely to damage your business than to help you at all.

Spinning is based on a fundamental misunderstanding.

It's a solution to a "problem" that doesn't actually exist.

Many people "spin" content and use it in various ways, get some benefits just from spreading the content around, and then wrongly attribute those benefits to the fact that it's been "spun", genuinely not realizing that they could actually have had the same benefits without the "spinning" stage.

A lot of people are confused about what "duplicate" and "syndicated" content are. A lot of people are also confused about what the words "original" and "unique" mean. The whole subject's hugely misunderstood. The only beneficiaries of spinning software and services are the people selling them (have you noticed that there've been fewer and fewer of them here, every year, over the last 5 years?).

These three posts will probably tell you all you need to know ...

http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...ml#post7651906

http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...ml#post6021235

http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...d-tactics.html

This is good advice, spinning articles will get you penalized by Google as others here have said, it is actually better to have less articles with better content than many articles that have been spun.

Wow! Really? Please don't!

Sorry, but that about sums up my feelings about spinning articles, whether with a tool or manually. You can write your own faster than you can manually spin one, anyway!

If your English isn't good enough to write articles yourself, you better pay a lot for them! Otherwise, you'll likely get ripped off because you won't be able to tell if what was written for you was any good or not.

We have our own content writing service that is pretty reasonable, but it's certainly more than $5 per article. Besides, a 300 word article is practically useless these days.

If you are creating articles just for keywords, you are going to be sorely disappointed in the results you get. Google, especially, doesn't work like that anymore. It's about creating content that people like and share - not stuffing keywords on a page. User engagement metrics are now very much a part of the algorithms of all of the major search engines. The longer you keep them on a page, the better.

I still use spinning for some things, but not for article writing. If you can't write on your own, you can outsource it.

If you spin correctly, and know enough English to know that :

{There are dozens of|There are lots of|There are numerous} {ways|methods|techniques} to spin {content|articles|information}in {positive|beneficial} ways.

-- And the end result never ends up sounding like gibberish no matter how many times you spin it, then spinning has its uses.

Especially if you are also spinning nouns and different keywords into the articles and not just the adjectives. Ex : You can find {double wall ovens|dual fuel ovens|double oven gas ranges} at {the lowest prices|discount prices|wholesale prices} here {today|now|right now}.

It is possible to make really high quality spinnable articles, but I only START with a spinner, then I have to manually make changes to them, so that they never come out as gibberish AND have a mix of different keywords in different sections of the article.