Mass Email server/software suggestions

5 replies
Hello everyone,

I have put together a list of emails that I collected (Yes it conforms to spam laws, but not to many of the mass email services terms of service like mailchimp etc.) and I need to find a server/software combination that is fairly simple. I think AT MOST I would be sending out 6,000 emails every three weeks.

Also, I have thought about using my personal gmail account to send out these emails (which is also my business/voice over account), but might switch to my website server email instead to do this.

So in conclusion:

What software/server combination would you recommend?

Would you suggest sending out the emails from my currently used gmail account or making a dedicated email address on my website server for sending out these emails?

Thanks for your help!

Neil
#email #mass #server or software #suggestions
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Are they people who opted in, Neil - people who know who you are and are expecting to hear from you?

    Legal considerations aside, the answer to what you're asking inevitably depends on knowing this (simply because if they're not, then you have far fewer options available, and if there's any real risk of "spam complaints", whether justified/legal or not, some of them could be dangerous. For example, using your website server could easily turn out to be a complete disaster, depending on where it's hosted and with whom the domain-name is registered. There are practical considerations, as well as possibly legal ones).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8255918].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author NeilKHess
      They have not opted in, but based on my understanding of spam laws, opting in is not required in the states. Have I been misinformed?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8255929].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        I'm not a lawyer, and I'm not in the US, but my understanding is that you haven't been misinformed and that you're right.

        However, as I said, "legal considerations aside", there are practical considerations here. The trouble you get into, if recipients complain about spam, isn't any less or any easier because they're "wrong" to complain and/or you haven't broken the law.

        This is all I can say, because in this forum, supporting, abetting or promoting the sending out of mass unsolicited mail has actually been a banning offense for over a decade, now - sorry. If you're proposing to send out bulk, unsolicited email, however legal that may be, this really isn't the right place to ask for advice/guidance about it.

        To look at that a slightly different way, you might want to take your clue from the fact that autoresponder companies won't allow you to do this, because the reasons they won't allow it (and the effects it would have on them, if they did) are broadly speaking the same as the reasons you might not want to do it yourself, either. Just a thought.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8255997].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
          This is all I can say, because in this forum, supporting, abetting or promoting the sending out of mass unsolicited mail has actually been a banning offense for over a decade, now - sorry.
          Yep. Still is, and probably always will be.

          This isn't the mid-90s, when rational people could claim not to understand the potential impact of sending UBE. At this point, they're making a conscious decision to behave in destructive ways.


          Paul
          Signature
          .
          Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8256035].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Steve B
        Neil,

        You are right, opting in is not a requirement for compliance with Can-Spam. However, prudent business practice and the use of email suggests that you should try to get permission from prospects prior to emailing them anything of a commercial nature.

        This is what I would do . . . others will tell you something different. I would use a reputable email service that allows you to import Non-Optin Addresses. There are some out there. I wouldn't send the emails from a personal or important email address that you want to keep white listed. Reputable services will get more of your messages through.

        I would send a non-selling, non-offering, non-advertising email to the list providing them with something original and of great value that shows your expertise. I would ask the recipients if they would be interested in receiving more of the same (or Part 2, etc) and if so, send them to your squeeze page so that you can get their opt-in permission.

        To comply with Can-Spam be sure to:
        • Use only accurate header information (no false "to", "from", "reply-to" etc.
        • Use only accurate subject lines (no false or deceptive message)
        • When you get around to send commercial emails (not this first one), be sure to label them as such
        • Include a valid physical postal address
        • Very important: tell the addressee how to opt out of further emails from you and make the process simply and easy
        • Promptly honor all opt-outs as they come in
        • If your email is handled by a 3rd party or service, you must keep tabs on what they are doing as you have the legal responsibility to monitor compliance
        I'm not giving legal advice so do your own due diligence. This is my suggestion of a way to try to get permission before sending commercial messages. Yes, you will end up with a much smaller list than you started with; however, the prospects on your list will want to hear what you have to say and in my book, that is worth way more than a huge list of non-responders.

        Good luck to you,

        Steve
        Signature

        Steve Browne, online business strategies, tips, guidance, and resources
        SteveBrowneDirect

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8256040].message }}

Trending Topics