Are attractive Females not allowed to have Twitter accounts?

Yes, that is what it is used for. But Twitter can decide what links they do or do not want to allow coming from their site. Sometimes they won't like a domain for no apparent reason and ban the account. It happens. If you want to see if it was your link, create another Twitter account, put your link up, start to tweet, and see if it gets banned to.

Another possibility could have been the tweet itself. Were you using an excessive amount of trending hashtags? They tend to lock accounts for that as well.

Ive had the same problem in the past, except im a guy, that is extremly handsome.

Now days when i create a new twitter account I have to photoshop myself so I look more ugly, otherways they ban my account instantly.

Maybe then try creating a new account again and see how it turns out.

You can't be too sure, she must have violated one of their rules.

Just a little. I think this topic went way off course.

I could mention many real cases.

Have you ever read anything about terrorism?

Or, is terrorism something rare in our world?

That's not "no reason". Who'd you follow? The basic suggestions like Obama, Jimmy Fallon, Bo Burnham? Or were you targeting people? You didn't reveal the nature of the tweet either.

That's the problem with things like this: you're only going to get half of the story and the person telling it isn't going to be too keen to talk about what they were actually doing.

Seriously? There are plenty of attractive females on FaceBook, Twitter, etc.

What made your daughter different? Is she more attractive than all the other females with accounts so they just targeted her? Do you really think that happened?

The notion that the ban was because she is pretty is far fetched. I noticed that in your signature you have a Wordpress blog about setting up a Wordpress membership sites, if both you and your daughter share the same ip address and you have that site in your profile, it is very possible that they may believe that you created another account and uploaded a pic of a pretty girl to hide behind.

Having multiple accounts is acceptable but they may frown upon deception which may not be the case but was picked up by their filters.




P.S. I cannot possibly know the exact reason for the ban, it is just a thought to ponder over.

You haven't based that accusation on anything. You're hoping because it's easier to believe that "the man" is out to get you. As I said before all that there is here is your side of the story, which is less than half at best.

Your video was how to install wordpress on a cpanel server. Only certain things are coming out of that: web design/managing services, hosting affiliate services, or "I'll teach you how to set up your website" services. All fall under the large umbrella of IM topics, and will attract the people that are in that niche. You said so yourself in your original post: this is one of your "projects", which in the context of a marketing forum means it is safe to infer that this video wasn't a "out of the kindness of your heart" tutorial to help some 12 year old blogger get her diary online.

Your Twitter "project" was poorly executed. Deal with it and move on. Or don't. There's enough people working on the "projects" that I mentioned above as it is.

There's your solution then! Change your IP and set up a new account with your own photo and do the same steps again and you should be just fine. If not, then you know that wasn't the reason.

Like I said if the account gets flagged by a human or some types of automated flags, then there'll be a human review. Though it's not standard and they don't look at every account, just as the mods here don't read every thread.

Butt-Ugly redneck would be closer to the truth... :p

Actually, paranoid people very commonly use facts to support their suspicions, and very commonly become avid gatherers of more facts they think relevant, but that doesn't mean they aren't making wildly speculative conclusions about those facts. Facts are one thing; making them fit your narrative is another, and we all do it (but clearly, not all narratives are equal, the same facts can be used to support opposite points of view).

Unless I missed something, you have mentioned a few facts, but they amount to very thin evidence to support your premise that twitter is shutting down accounts based on youth, the female gender, and the attractiveness of the profile pic.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but here is pretty much the entirety of your case factually, (3 basic points) from what you've said in the thread: 1) that you believe your daughter fits the profile you suspect Twitter uses to discriminate: young, female, and with an attractive pic, and 2) her account got shut down shortly after uploading her attractive pic, and 3) she didn't do anything else you can figure out that would have triggered the ban, so you presume it was caused by who she is, since she did nothing wrong in your opinion.

Unless there is more to the story, then as I said earlier, the whole thread is based on pure conjecture; the above facts do not constitute a strong case for discrimination; they allow for that possibility, but there are many other possibilities they also allow for. Your whole case so far is a suspicion with very scant, inconclusive evidence to support it, and good reasons to doubt it.

PS: As an afterthought, I'm adding something I figured you might find a glaring omission that I left out above, although seriously, I forgot it because it is so useless as evidence for your case: fact #4) That your "ugly mug" account wasn't banned, which led you to suspect it was the pretty face that did it.

You might have to wait a while for that: they like alliterative updates to go with their Panda and Penguin. We might get the Pandora, Philippa and Petronella updates some time soon, though.

This. Is what happened here, it seems.

The rest was blather and nonsense. Some of it, admittedly, was reasonably entertaining blather and nonsense.

I know you weren't asking me, but if you were wondering, I'm here only because I heard you were here, Bill.