Power Article Rewriter

12 replies
Has anyone heard of Power Article Rewriter...and does it work?
It's an article rewriter that is supposed to "spin" an article into multiple articles, all of which are capable of "fooling the search engines."
#article #power #power article rewriter #rewriter
  • Profile picture of the author JayMachado
    It works in that you are in control of how you change things yes. But duplicate content may not be as big of a problem as you may think - especially when it comes to backlinks.

    Just my 2 cents for people who read this -

    If you stick to one niche and go deep in it, there's no reason you can't write an article in 15 minutes. You just have to be consistent. I actually have 2 notebooks - articles that I can go to when I run out of fresh ideas and ones that I'm currently working. I never feel like I'm running out of ideas because I have a whole notebook that I haven't even tapped yet.

    Just last week alone, I had one 7 article day and one 10 article day.

    I will say that I am playing around with Unique Article Wizard but mostly for the backlinks rather than the article rewriting. But I'm building such good traffic just from my EzineArticles in different niches that I'll probably end up canceling my subscription.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[798806].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Marty S
      Originally Posted by JayMachado View Post

      The way those things work, it actually ends up taking you longer to do all the coding necessary than it would if you just wrote a whole new article.
      This is not true at all. PAR makes the most of each original article you write. So if you did have a 7 article day, PAR could turn it into a 70 or 140 article day. The synonym replacement feature alone speeds things up significantly. The OP is asking about rewriting, not writing - entirely different concepts.

      OP: supposed to "spin" an article into multiple articles, all of which are capable of "fooling the search engines.

      Just look at the articles as original content not nec fooling anything. If you have multiple sites yourself it is quite useful for each to have original content, however for using in article directories, I would let them fight it out over maybe 1, 2 or maybe 3 versions.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[798867].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author JayMachado
        Originally Posted by Marty S View Post

        This is not true at all. PAR makes the most of each original article you write. So if you did have a 7 article day, PAR could turn it into a 70 or 140 article day. The synonym replacement feature alone speeds things up significantly. The OP is asking about rewriting, not writing - entirely different concepts.
        I think then I must be used to things like Spontent where you have to insert all the brackets and such. It's not so bad with sentences but when you want to add entirely new paragraphs, it can be a little bit more difficult.

        But that's why I am trying out UAW so I can leverage my 7 article days into much more.

        The last thing I would trust is "synonym replacement" - that's when you start getting the real junk coming out. I trust my own ability to just think of different ways to say things much more than any computer.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[798880].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Marty S
          Originally Posted by JayMachado View Post

          The last thing I would trust is "synonym replacement" - that's when you start getting the real junk coming out. I trust my own ability to just think of different ways to say things much more than any computer.
          Again - non-related. You do know you can start a thread of your own to promote your course right?

          What you are now referring to is robotic spewed crap which is useless - I think everyone here (WF) knows that. PAR content is 100% controlled by the user. You may want to try the free trial.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[798899].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Terry Kyle
            Excellent tool - but don't take my word for it. Try it for free and see for yourself (like all IM methods/tools).
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[798921].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author JayMachado
            Originally Posted by Marty S View Post

            Again - non-related. You do know you can start a thread of your own to promote your course right?

            What you are now referring to is robotic spewed crap which is useless - I think everyone here (WF) knows that. PAR content is 100% controlled by the user. You may want to try the free trial.
            If people try out my course, great but if they don't - no worries. I'm just passionate about content. Yes, knowing about the technical stuff of product creation and IM is great but we have to take a step back and realize why we're doing what we're doing. I see myself much more of a content marketer than an Internet marketer - and this is a shift I think a lot of people are making.

            I think I tried it before and it just didn't suit my needs because you're not adding more value by shifting the sentences around, even if it's human controlled. And software like that does take advantage of people's fears about duplicate content when really the duplicate content is more about having the same stuff on your own site.

            Edited:

            I would say it's actually 2 issues about PAR - for what it does and if you're creating articles to just build backlinks, then it's an awesome tool just like Unique Article Wizard. If you're wanting to create original articles that are helpful, then that's a different story. I should have clarified this more.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[798937].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Marty S
              Originally Posted by JayMachado View Post

              If people try out my course, great but if they don't - no worries. I'm just passionate about content. Yes, knowing about the technical stuff of product creation and IM is great but we have to take a step back and realize why we're doing what we're doing. I see myself much more of a content marketer than an Internet marketer - and this is a shift I think a lot of people are making.

              I think I tried it before and it just didn't suit my needs because you're not adding more value by replacing a few synonyms. And software like that does take advantage of people's fears about duplicate content when really the duplicate content is more about having the same stuff on your own site.
              I have no problem with you trying to sell another article course. That's a lot what this forum is about.

              However, it is obvious you know NOTHING of PAR and had you tried it before you would realize how unrelated your (negative) references to it are. Like I said before, the synonym feature is one of the features - completely controlled by the user - the feature has nothing to do with the nonsense you are stating about replacing a few synonyms to make original content.

              The OP was asking about PAR, not how to write original articles. I own it and have no vested interest in the product. As you can see from my sig, I am also not marketing anything to him.

              IMHO you are not doing yourself any favors by shooting innuendos at a product many people on this forum own and use, simply for the purpose of flogging your course. There are other productive, helpful ways to participate here that will add (not detract) to your credibility.

              @OPer - 15 day free trial for PAR. What else is there to say?
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[799114].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author JayMachado
                I used Power Article Rewriter about a year ago - and it's basically just a more automated version of Spontent so that you don't have to worry as much about the programming aspect. I got REALLY good at article spinning actually.

                I don't mean to diss it completely and I 100% agree that I DID in fact oversimplify it because you're right, everything is user controlled and spinning like that isn't as bad as people think- I'm just expressing my opinion that I value original content, that's all. There's plenty of people succeeding online that don't have to use tools like that to produce content. I'm glad to know that you're getting good results with the product.

                And as far as me trying to sell him something, it's in my signature wherever I go and whatever I post on. It's in my sig yes and I comment on threads like this because article marketing and producing content happens to be my speciality - I don't know much about PPC and I'm not afraid to admit it. Content is what I know best.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[799181].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Eliza. N
    Hi,

    I have never used an article spinner myself but I have heard that they can produce strange articles that are readable but the synonym use makes them a bit obscure. I suppose if it is just for backlinks there is not too much of a problem. But if your readers see it, that might reflect badly on your website. I dunno.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[799279].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author scattermouse
    Hey guys, I'm a little bit new here so I have no idea what that argument was about. I'm sceptical about the idea of an article spinner that can produce any sort of reasonable content, but, hey, if there's a free trial then why not?

    Is PAR definitely the one to try out, or are there other good ones around?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[799314].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Marty S
      I have tried quite a few to be honest, none of them perfect for me, but yes I thought PAR was best suited for what I needed.

      Just to clarify, one or more of the responses above was edited because PAR does not use software generated phrases as might have been suggested. I don't really know how to clarify such software but in PAR you have to input every word/phrase that makes up different versions of an original.

      So it is all your writing, not like some of the junk that is out there that doesn't even make any sense. I really don't think there are many members here that even use crap like that.

      You just input as many variations of sentences and words as you can, while the software expedites that activity by separating lines and offering synonym choices which NO human can duplicate in a comparable time (instantly). When you are done it will "spin" out different versions of your writing, which is not software enhanced by any means.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[799342].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jay Ang
    I've used quite a few content spinners and have to admit that PAR is probably one of the best that I've come across ..

    My opinion is that content spinners as such hastens the rewriting process as opposed to manually rewriting on a word processor ... thats it ... Human effort is definitely still required and whether the rewritten article makes sense or appears to be gibberish relies on it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[799497].message }}

Trending Topics