I have this idea I'm debating trying.. ...ADVICE NEEDED???

Well, since you mentioned Jay Abraham, try to imagine what he might advise you to do. The first thing that popped into my head was to find someone to JV with; they supply the main ideas for the product, and perhaps become the more visible partner if they have more impressive credentials, and you do most of the grunt work (make a website, get the physical parts of it manufactured etc), and market it.

It isn't surprising that you got some negative responses, given your first post didn't make any mention of how you would produce such a high end product, but said your main challenge was producing a good enough sales pitch to sell an info product for $5k or more.

You said nothing about the challenge of not only producing the product, but making sure it benefits the buyers some multiple of it's cost. That is somewhat disturbing. If I were buying it, I'd prefer to do so from someone who put at least as much thought and effort into making a great product as making a great pitch to sell it.

So you need to produce a product yourself, or with someone else, that you know will bring in at least $10k in increased revenue in the first year, or better yet, the first few months, for the buyers. It seems to me the pitch would be much less of a challenge if you could first address that challenge.

If you're really serious about helping them rather than just making money for yourself, why not do a beta version, test it with 10 or 20 people, and then you'll have incredible testimonials (if it's good enough), and can make improvements, and even kick start your marketing with referrals from the testers. You don't have to test for free, but charge little enough that if it needs a lot of improvement, they won't feel burned; in other words, even your beta testers need to get more value than they paid for.

If you plan to produce it yourself, you need an angle you haven't yet mentioned (unless I missed something). You say you haven't got experience in the fields of those you want to sell to; that is okay, as long as you can really produce results for them. But if you have only some vague idea of "helping them improve their practice", without a real plan, then you need a whole business model before concerning yourself with the pitch.

So maybe it's crazy, or maybe a great idea. We don't know because we haven't heard much about the idea other than it will cost a lot and help professionals improve their practice. That's just way too vague to give me confidence that you have something good. You might or you might not, but it sounds like you have a lot of work to do before any of us can be expected to give you a thumbs up that means anything.

So what you're saying is that teaching people your theories is better than teaching people what you actually know?

This is true in the world of science but it doesn't always work online.