What are your preferred mediums for product assimilation

22 replies
Hi there I just wanted to get an idea from various folks here as to what your preferred method is when you get a product. Now I'm a writer, so I would prefer to read stuff, and if it's technical with illustrations to make things clearer.

However I read some "statistics" now and then and some people say that audio products are a preferred method of product distribution because people would prefer to listen to audios, and they can carry them around.

Now me personally, aside from creating written stuff, I would create videos before creating audios because I think they could show so much more. And I would respond better to videos in some instances.

Now, don't come back to me saying "I would do it in all three" because we know that is not always practical. If you're putting out an audio product, you don't know how it's going to do. To actually go and make transcripts from the get go if you don't know if it's going to be successful or not is crazy.

So, let me know which would you prefer and why, from a learning point of view.
#assimilation #mediums #preferred #product
  • Profile picture of the author trevord92
    For me personally, in descending order of preference:
    • Written
    • Audio
    • Video
    For the people who buy from me, it seems to be:
    • Video = most preferred, ideally with a transcript or similar
    Which doesn't mean to say that the other methods don't sell, just that I personally seem to get less sales from them.


    As they say, your mileage may vary
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8958612].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      Hi Trevord, thanks for your answer. I would go for written and video. As someone else mentioned here, it depends what you're teaching too.

      Originally Posted by trevord92 View Post

      For me personally, in descending order of preference:
      • Written
      • Audio
      • Video
      For the people who buy from me, it seems to be:
      • Video = most preferred, ideally with a transcript or similar
      Which doesn't mean to say that the other methods don't sell, just that I personally seem to get less sales from them.


      As they say, your mileage may vary
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960080].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bluebrain
    I prefer pdf format, because I can assimilate it much faster. Time is an issue for me (I guess for everybody). And then I can come back and re-read the most difficult parts. Some pictures help for better understanding.

    Video is cool too, except for the parts that I already know but I still have to watch for fear I don't miss something I don't know. If you offer transcripts, it's really awesome cause people can quickly get to the interesting parts instead of sitting and watching the whole thing.

    If you can do video, go for it cause it has a higher perceived value, but offer pdf too for people who are in a hurry.
    Signature
    Mine crypto coins not using graphics cards but by building gold mines in an online strategy game???
    [EASY $100 a month] How to make money playing GoldenTowns
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8958624].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      That's the way I feel. You can actually mark the text for the parts you really are studying and making notes off. Although, I understand that whole "perceived value" thing, I was just wondering what different folks' preference was, if I was alone in the written word format preference.

      Originally Posted by bluebrain View Post

      I prefer pdf format, because I can assimilate it much faster. Time is an issue for me (I guess for everybody). And then I can come back and re-read the most difficult parts. Some pictures help for better understanding.

      Video is cool too, except for the parts that I already know but I still have to watch for fear I don't miss something I don't know. If you offer transcripts, it's really awesome cause people can quickly get to the interesting parts instead of sitting and watching the whole thing.

      If you can do video, go for it cause it has a higher perceived value, but offer pdf too for people who are in a hurry.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960087].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author art72
    As a writer, I always believed the 'written' products are superior, but to re-purpose the writing into other formats (audio and video) is something I am considering for clients who either don't have time to read or simply don't prefer to read.

    A lot of people are visual learners, so video would be my second choice.

    Having just recently listened to Napoleon Hill's "Outwitting the Devil" on audio... I actually rather enjoyed the audio book file, and can see where people might prefer to listen as opposed to reading.

    I guess it's all a matter of preference, but in the end you should probably reformat your writings to reach the audiences who prefer visual or audio... so, though you say; don't say all 3, it seems to be what many writers and marketers are doing to reach broader audiences.
    Signature
    Atop a tree with Buddha ain't a bad place to take rest!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8958800].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
      I know you didn't want the "do all three" answer, but I have to give you a variation of it here.

      My preferred medium is whatever is most appropriate for the information being conveyed.

      If something can be effectively taught via text, I don't see the point to putting text in video format just to say it's a video. (Actually, that would clean out a bunch of the crap clogging YouTube.)

      And rather than do an audio and then a transcript, I prefer the other way around. Create the text and then read it to create the audio. Raw transcripts are a bugger to read most of the time, as the transcriber leaves in all the ums, ahs and false starts.

      The flip side is when some action would take a 30 second video clip vs. 8-10 pages of description and screen shots.

      The best instruction packages I've found, as a consumer in and out of the IM space, are multimedia packages where the creator has actually given some thought to the medium best suited to each part of the information. If that means "all three", so be it.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8959002].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
        There's a lot in what you say. For instance if I was teaching a course on how to do powerpoint presentations and convert them to video, I think the video would work much better for the end user.

        I also agree that if you're going to do audio, first write the script and then read it. I worked as an audio engineer for years, and recorded many a voice over. The guys who read always had the minimal editing afterwards. The guys who did it off the top of their heads, we had to edit the "ah", and "um" and just a lot of stuff that wouldn't have to be there if they had just write the script first.

        And there probably is that rare product out there that would require all three versions. Truly need it as opposed to perceived value.


        Originally Posted by JohnMcCabe View Post

        I know you didn't want the "do all three" answer, but I have to give you a variation of it here.

        My preferred medium is whatever is most appropriate for the information being conveyed.

        If something can be effectively taught via text, I don't see the point to putting text in video format just to say it's a video. (Actually, that would clean out a bunch of the crap clogging YouTube.)

        And rather than do an audio and then a transcript, I prefer the other way around. Create the text and then read it to create the audio. Raw transcripts are a bugger to read most of the time, as the transcriber leaves in all the ums, ahs and false starts.

        The flip side is when some action would take a 30 second video clip vs. 8-10 pages of description and screen shots.

        The best instruction packages I've found, as a consumer in and out of the IM space, are multimedia packages where the creator has actually given some thought to the medium best suited to each part of the information. If that means "all three", so be it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960107].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      That is also my natural progression, written text first, video second. And yes when creating products, it is true, you can write the whole product first and later create a video version and an audio version , if that was something really required. I've yet to go the route of audio books. I can listen to someone's course on audio, but a bona fide book on audio, I just always prefer to go and read the thing. Maybe someday I'll try the medium out...

      Originally Posted by art72 View Post

      As a writer, I always believed the 'written' products are superior, but to re-purpose the writing into other formats (audio and video) is something I am considering for clients who either don't have time to read or simply don't prefer to read.

      A lot of people are visual learners, so video would be my second choice.

      Having just recently listened to Napoleon Hill's "How to Beat the Devil" on audio... I actually rather enjoyed the audio book file, and can see where people might prefer to listen as opposed to reading.

      I guess it's all a matter of preference, but in the end you should probably reformat your writings to reach the audiences who prefer visual or audio... so, though you say; don't say all 3, it seems to be what many writers and marketers are doing to reach broader audiences.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960094].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author IanM723
    Originally Posted by Jeff Gilbert View Post

    Hi there I just wanted to get an idea from various folks here as to what your preferred method is when you get a product. Now I'm a writer, so I would prefer to read stuff, and if it's technical with illustrations to make things clearer.

    However I read some "statistics" now and then and some people say that audio products are a preferred method of product distribution because people would prefer to listen to audios, and they can carry them around.

    Now me personally, aside from creating written stuff, I would create videos before creating audios because I think they could show so much more. And I would respond better to videos in some instances.

    Now, don't come back to me saying "I would do it in all three" because we know that is not always practical. If you're putting out an audio product, you don't know how it's going to do. To actually go and make transcripts from the get go if you don't know if it's going to be successful or not is crazy.

    So, let me know which would you prefer and why, from a learning point of view.
    Well, for me personally, and I have certainly bought my share of products , I actually enjoy video. In particular, I usually like video where it is a narrated Powerpoint presentation. I just find that I get so much more from that than any other style of product presentation.

    My second choice would be text presentation. Probably my least favorite method of assimilation would be audio. I think the big problem with strictly audio presentations is that it is just much too easy to become distracted or not pay full attention to the presentation (eg, most people listen while doing something else rather than paying full attention to the audio presentation).

    I have bought several products which actually give you all three forms of material - a video, a text transcript of the video, and an mp3 as well. That is very cool but I don't think that would sway towards buying a product just because the video also had an mp3 and a transcript.

    Hope that helps.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8959035].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      I think that there are some trainings that could be done with audio, but I feel that especially if you're trying to explain something that is going to be done on a program or on the screen, explaining in audio alone is going to be challening for the listener, whereas an illustrated book or a video could do it better justice. What I find sometimes is that depending on who's doing the audio, sometimes it puts me to sleep.

      Originally Posted by IanM723 View Post

      Well, for me personally, and I have certainly bought my share of products , I actually enjoy video. In particular, I usually like video where it is a narrated Powerpoint presentation. I just find that I get so much more from that than any other style of product presentation.

      My second choice would be text presentation. Probably my least favorite method of assimilation would be audio. I think the big problem with strictly audio presentations is that it is just much too easy to become distracted or not pay full attention to the presentation (eg, most people listen while doing something else rather than paying full attention to the audio presentation).

      I have bought several products which actually give you all three forms of material - a video, a text transcript of the video, and an mp3 as well. That is very cool but I don't think that would sway towards buying a product just because the video also had an mp3 and a transcript.

      Hope that helps.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960115].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Samuel Adams
    The more ideal way to learn is via one on one class room style tutorial. For this reason, videos can work. But they fall short when you have questions. The advantages of learning from a live video webinar, such as you might have with Google hangouts is how you can ask questions and get instant feedback from the person if you need help. I would appreciate a live web series that allowed students the chance to interact with the teacher on internet marketing subjects.
    Signature

    Would you like to learn how I make $2000/month from a super easy listbuilding system?

    Click here to get my listbuilding report for FREE!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8959073].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      Well, I think that medium is going to be a great teaching tool as time goes on. I can certainly think of various scenarios where not only do you have your original material that you were going to teach, but it's further developed upon by the questions that students or people attending the seminar may have.

      These subjects are usually those which were not in the original curriculum, but are related and were omitted by simply not thinking about it for this training session, but the person's question brings it out in the open, and it benefits everyone in turn. So, I think that Google Hangouts are going to be very valuable in the future in creating educational products, because there is that interaction.

      Originally Posted by Samuel Adams View Post

      The more ideal way to learn is via one on one class room style tutorial. For this reason, videos can work. But they fall short when you have questions. The advantages of learning from a live video webinar, such as you might have with Google hangouts is how you can ask questions and get instant feedback from the person if you need help. I would appreciate a live web series that allowed students the chance to interact with the teacher on internet marketing subjects.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960125].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeffery Moss
      Originally Posted by Samuel Adams View Post

      The more ideal way to learn is via one on one class room style tutorial. For this reason, videos can work. But they fall short when you have questions. The advantages of learning from a live video webinar, such as you might have with Google hangouts is how you can ask questions and get instant feedback from the person if you need help. I would appreciate a live web series that allowed students the chance to interact with the teacher on internet marketing subjects.
      Another advantage of using a Google Hangout is how your video stream can be archived on Youtube for your subscribers. This would be valuable content for your website or blog or email list, simply link to it after the hang out is over. Videos of past hang outs is a good way to presell future webinars as it says, 'look what you missed last time'.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8961424].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
        Oh yes, hangouts is becoming more and more a marketers treasure, because there are so many ways you can use the videos.

        Originally Posted by Jeffery Moss View Post

        Another advantage of using a Google Hangout is how your video stream can be archived on Youtube for your subscribers. This would be valuable content for your website or blog or email list, simply link to it after the hang out is over. Videos of past hang outs is a good way to presell future webinars as it says, 'look what you missed last time'.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8969531].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sprucehill
    It depends on what is being taught. Some things actually need video if something needs to be shown, such as how to use a plugin or software, etc. However, having said that, I greatly prefer text because I am a very fast reader. I can scan through 25 pages of text in a couple of minutes. One or two videos as supplement to the text is also fine if they are not too long - maybe 5-7 minutes.

    I will not buy any course or WSO that is hours and hours of video only. I just do not have time to waste watching several hours of video when I can read the same information in a few minutes. Most video courses don't get right to the point, they just ramble on and on.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960144].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      And that is exactly how I feel. I can get through a written product a lot faster than having a to watch a video. Not only that, you can scan a document. Sometimes I watch a video at very fast speeds and then pick out the spots where there was something interesting.

      Originally Posted by sprucehill View Post

      It depends on what is being taught. Some things actually need video if something needs to be shown, such as how to use a plugin or software, etc. However, having said that, I greatly prefer text because I am a very fast reader. I can scan through 25 pages of text in a couple of minutes. One or two videos as supplement to the text is also fine if they are not too long - maybe 5-7 minutes.

      I will not buy any course or WSO that is hours and hours of video only. I just do not have time to waste watching several hours of video when I can read the same information in a few minutes. Most video courses don't get right to the point, they just ramble on and on.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8969521].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author travlinguy
    Written
    Audio

    Video with major reservations. I need to know who made the video. In other words, I need to know s/he knows how to use the medium without a lot of ahhhh... oooo, scratching his head and a lot of other unprofessional and casual nonsense and distracting stuff, especially music playing in the background.

    It's rare for me to buy WSOs but in the last two months there were two I would have scooped up in a heartbeat but they were only offered in video. Same thing goes for video sales presentations. I won't look at them. There are rare exceptions though.

    I did watch one last week that was actually very well done. The reason I watched it was because they were pitching a video type product and I figured if the video was professional then maybe the actual product would be decent. Other than that I'm not going to even click on a video.

    Marketers thinking video is the only way to go for sales presentations and product delivery are leaving a lot of money on the table by not making their stuff available in other mediums.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8960283].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      That's another one of my pet peeves too. Not only the ahhhh's and ums but also, recording the voice with immense room sound, or through a crappy mic. That coupled with lower res video. I mean, if video is the ONLY thing you're offering it has to be stellar. Otherwise, it just supports one of my theories, people make videos because it's hard for them to write, or even type.

      Originally Posted by travlinguy View Post

      Written
      Audio

      Video with major reservations. I need to know who made the video. In other words, I need to know s/he knows how to use the medium without a lot of ahhhh... oooo, scratching his head and a lot of other unprofessional and casual nonsense and distracting stuff, especially music playing in the background.

      It's rare for me to buy WSOs but in the last two months there were two I would have scooped up in a heartbeat but they were only offered in video. Same thing goes for video sales presentations. I won't look at them. There are rare exceptions though.

      I did watch one last week that was actually very well done. The reason I watched it was because they were pitching a video type product and I figured if the video was professional then maybe the actual product would be decent. Other than that I'm not going to even click on a video.

      Marketers thinking video is the only way to go for sales presentations and product delivery are leaving a lot of money on the table by not making their stuff available in other mediums.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8969528].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Adie
    I always promote CB products with short videos and great written sales page. In my experience as a seller, this is more effective than just written or video only sales pages.
    Signature



    Moderator's Note: You're only allowed to put your own products or sites in your signature.

    Signature edited.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8961444].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author absolutelee
    I personally prefer pdf format because I can skim over the stuff I already know and focus on the stuff I don't know. Video ads a lot of "production value", however, to a product, so in general you can get a higher price. As a hybrid, recently, I've been writing reports that link out to videos that show specific stuff that's easier shown than written about.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8969638].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeff Gilbert
      That sounds like a good strategy, but are these videos being produced by you or just a generic video on youtube. Cause I've seen people put out products where they have a link to a video that is not theirs and they're not remotely affiliated with the person who created the video. When I see stuff like that, I just say, here's somebody throwing money out the window...

      Anyway, I hope you're producing the videos.

      Originally Posted by absolutelee View Post

      I personally prefer pdf format because I can skim over the stuff I already know and focus on the stuff I don't know. Video ads a lot of "production value", however, to a product, so in general you can get a higher price. As a hybrid, recently, I've been writing reports that link out to videos that show specific stuff that's easier shown than written about.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8972388].message }}

Trending Topics