What is more important?

25 replies
What is more important to success:

Intelligence or reliability?

Of course, both are necessary but if you could only
have one in yourself or a partner, which would you take?
#important
  • Reliability

    see I'm not that bright, so had to look it up

    noun
    1.
    the ability to be relied on or depended on, as for accuracy, honesty, or achievement.


    and, 7 Different definitions of intelligence!

    so many, it dosn't sound very reliable, or intelligent to me

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9728904].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author agc
    Originally Posted by Sangfroid View Post

    What is more important to success:

    Intelligence or reliability?

    Of course, both are necessary but if you could only
    have one in yourself or a partner, which would you take?
    Which do you have? Structure how you do things so that is the thing that counts more.

    Have really smart but unreliable people? Make sure they don't get paid if they don't deliver.

    Have really reliable people but not the smartest? Make them work together in teams and build in a socratic test for acceptance.

    If its YOU... then clearly reliability is more import as its the only thing YOU can control.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9729051].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author somedevil
    Intelligence without a doubt.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9729222].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rickdangelo
    For me it would be intelligence. because with it reliability comes naturally.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9730450].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author debbiesherman
    For me it would be intelligence.

    It may sound a little shallow but I think that reliability sometimes comes with the intelligence so I guess you will become reliable because of intelligence. And I believe that intelligence is not just about the academic side its about every aspect in our lives.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9730916].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Sangfroid
      Originally Posted by debbiesherman View Post

      For me it would be intelligence.

      It may sound a little shallow but I think that reliability sometimes comes with the intelligence so I guess you will become reliable because of intelligence. And I believe that intelligence is not just about the academic side its about every aspect in our lives.
      Hi Debbie,

      But what if you are brilliant but can't be relied on to do anything
      on time?

      Be Well
      Don
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9731991].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HDRider
        Originally Posted by Sangfroid View Post

        Hi Debbie,

        But what if you are brilliant but can't be relied on to do anything
        on time?

        Be Well
        Don
        What if you are reliable but can't do anything, remember anything shown to you or think on your own.

        I have had reliable employees that actually slowed me down and cost more than they were worth. I'll take intelligence
        Signature

        ~ Ultra Fast Product Creation - Creating your own products is where the real money is... Let me show you how in this step by step guide.

        ~ Get Your Mind Right and Everything Else is Easy! Law of Attraction States...You Attract What You Think About.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9732024].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author debbiesherman
        Originally Posted by Sangfroid View Post

        Hi Debbie,

        But what if you are brilliant but can't be relied on to do anything
        on time?

        Be Well
        Don
        Hi Don!

        Like I mentioned I think reliability comes with intelligence. And as I mentioned as well intelligence comes in different forms. An intelligent person can be bad at numbers but are really good with words. I think if you are intelligent and you have honed your expertise people will rely on you on things related to your expertise. That's why in a company you have an accountant that you can rely on accounting and a graphic designer to do the designing and so on.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9733306].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tobyjensen
        Originally Posted by Sangfroid View Post

        Hi Debbie,

        But what if you are brilliant but can't be relied on to do anything
        on time?

        Be Well
        Don
        These hypothetical questions are sometimes seen as being redundant academic exercises with no practical application in the real world.

        Here is a practical application: People with the proper priorities become successful and stay that way. Knowing the priority of intelligence over reliability gives you an edge. Now go use it well, meaning, be smart first and then follow through with reliability.


        There are incredibly advanced ways to manage creative, intelligent people who are erratic, eccentric, blunt, critical, and condescending. Just one example to get started is to allow them autonomy.

        Here are just two examples from several different categories of managing the creative individual Samantha:

        DEVELOPING
        Make her productive quickly
        Show her the simplest, quickest, most practical way to get results

        MOTIVATING
        Provide opportunities to work independently
        Allow her to direct the efforts of others

        COMPLIMENTING
        Use brief, direct statements, focusing on achievements, results, and leadership abilities
        Use concise, accurate, specific statements (preferably in private) about her competence, use of logic,
        efficiency, and precision

        COUNSELING
        Focus on obstacles to achieving results and how to eliminate them
        Present needed changes in terms of impact on results and consequences

        PROBLEM-SOLVING
        Tends to take a practical, results-oriented approach, preferring simple, easy-to-implement, immediate solutions
        May need to be directed toward considering the long-term consequences

        DELEGATING
        Tell her what result you need and by when; let her determine how to get it done
        Specify clearly the limits of authority and available resources, allowing autonomy within those limits

        CORRECTING
        Be firm and direct, specifying the desired result as well as current level of performance
        Direct the discussion to what she is going to do to eliminate the gap in performance

        DECISION-MAKING
        Tends to be a quick decision-maker
        May need coaching on taking time to gather sufficient information and considering possible consequences before making decisions
        Signature

        Toby Jensen - Invest in what works this time

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9735305].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Sangfroid
          Originally Posted by tobyjensen View Post

          These hypothetical questions are sometimes seen as being redundant academic exercises with no practical application in the real world.

          Here is a practical application: People with the proper priorities become successful and stay that way. Knowing the priority of intelligence over reliability gives you an edge. Now go use it well, meaning, be smart first and then follow through with reliability.


          There are incredibly advanced ways to manage creative, intelligent people who are erratic, eccentric, blunt, critical, and condescending. Just one example to get started is to allow them autonomy.

          Here are just two examples from several different categories of managing the creative individual Samantha:

          DEVELOPING
          Make her productive quickly
          Show her the simplest, quickest, most practical way to get results

          MOTIVATING
          Provide opportunities to work independently
          Allow her to direct the efforts of others

          COMPLIMENTING
          Use brief, direct statements, focusing on achievements, results, and leadership abilities
          Use concise, accurate, specific statements (preferably in private) about her competence, use of logic,
          efficiency, and precision

          COUNSELING
          Focus on obstacles to achieving results and how to eliminate them
          Present needed changes in terms of impact on results and consequences

          PROBLEM-SOLVING
          Tends to take a practical, results-oriented approach, preferring simple, easy-to-implement, immediate solutions
          May need to be directed toward considering the long-term consequences

          DELEGATING
          Tell her what result you need and by when; let her determine how to get it done
          Specify clearly the limits of authority and available resources, allowing autonomy within those limits

          CORRECTING
          Be firm and direct, specifying the desired result as well as current level of performance
          Direct the discussion to what she is going to do to eliminate the gap in performance

          DECISION-MAKING
          Tends to be a quick decision-maker
          May need coaching on taking time to gather sufficient information and considering possible consequences before making decisions
          Good points! Well said or I mean Intelligently said!
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9735537].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author dbostian
          Originally Posted by tobyjensen View Post

          These hypothetical questions are sometimes seen as being redundant academic exercises with no practical application in the real world.

          Here is a practical application: People with the proper priorities become successful and stay that way. Knowing the priority of intelligence over reliability gives you an edge. Now go use it well, meaning, be smart first and then follow through with reliability.


          There are incredibly advanced ways to manage creative, intelligent people who are erratic, eccentric, blunt, critical, and condescending. Just one example to get started is to allow them autonomy.

          Here are just two examples from several different categories of managing the creative individual Samantha:

          DEVELOPING
          Make her productive quickly
          Show her the simplest, quickest, most practical way to get results

          MOTIVATING
          Provide opportunities to work independently
          Allow her to direct the efforts of others

          COMPLIMENTING
          Use brief, direct statements, focusing on achievements, results, and leadership abilities
          Use concise, accurate, specific statements (preferably in private) about her competence, use of logic,
          efficiency, and precision

          COUNSELING
          Focus on obstacles to achieving results and how to eliminate them
          Present needed changes in terms of impact on results and consequences

          PROBLEM-SOLVING
          Tends to take a practical, results-oriented approach, preferring simple, easy-to-implement, immediate solutions
          May need to be directed toward considering the long-term consequences

          DELEGATING
          Tell her what result you need and by when; let her determine how to get it done
          Specify clearly the limits of authority and available resources, allowing autonomy within those limits

          CORRECTING
          Be firm and direct, specifying the desired result as well as current level of performance
          Direct the discussion to what she is going to do to eliminate the gap in performance

          DECISION-MAKING
          Tends to be a quick decision-maker
          May need coaching on taking time to gather sufficient information and considering possible consequences before making decisions
          Good Points! I also believe that people should use their intelligence to be reliable.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9735752].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author js088
    An intelligent person may not be reliable.
    A reliable person may not be very intelligent.

    But I think most people would go with reliable assuming that there is an intelligent person to lead them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9730944].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author premz
    intelligence is more important which will lead to success.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9731050].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author beastwood
    Banned
    I agree with Debbie, since intelligence is really broad we can say that intelligence is something important when it comes to being reliable. People will rely on you on the things you are good at and when you are good at something it means that your intelligence is on that side of things.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9733321].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JDLancaster
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9733402].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Sangfroid
      So, maybe the right answer is that neither one is
      more important. They are both equally important.

      One without the other does not work.

      But we don't want to work with a narcissistic ego-
      maniac.

      Nor do we want to work with a moron.

      A balance of the two works!
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9733557].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rory Singh
    Reliability for me is more important than intelligence.

    You can always acquire intelligence or know how no matter how ignorant someone may believe they are.

    But reliability is like loyalty. If you can not be loyal and dependent on yourself, then it does not matter how intelligent you may be...

    Because if you can not rely on yourself,

    then who can?

    Some of the smartest people in the world with very high IQ's come into IM and fail.

    Then you have had some people who you would be voted as the least 'likely' to succeed come here and make their legacy's.

    Meaning of intelligence: the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.

    However, knowledge is just 'Potential Power'.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9733606].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Sangfroid
      Originally Posted by Rory Singh View Post

      Reliability for me is more important than intelligence.

      You can always acquire intelligence or know how no matter how ignorant someone may believe they are.

      But reliability is like loyalty. If you can not be loyal and dependent on yourself, then it does not matter how intelligent you may be...

      Because if you can not rely on yourself,

      then who can?

      Some of the smartest people in the world with very high IQ's come into IM and fail.

      Then you have had some people who you would be voted as the least 'likely' to succeed come here and make their legacy's.

      Meaning of intelligence: the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.

      However, knowledge is just 'Potential Power'.
      Good points! If you are not reliable, what can you accomplish?

      And who would want to work with you.

      You would need at least a modicum of smarts to start with..............
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9734664].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author James Stark
    Originally Posted by Sangfroid View Post

    What is more important to success:

    Intelligence or reliability?

    Of course, both are necessary but if you could only
    have one in yourself or a partner, which would you take?
    Intelligence all the way. You can do anything with a little Intelligence.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9734982].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tobyjensen
    What is more important to success:

    Intelligence or reliability?

    Of course, both are necessary but if you could only
    have one in yourself or a partner, which would you take?


    Intelligence is more important than reliability because if nothing was leading all the reliability in the world would have no place to go. Sounds weird, right? Because reliability is the ability to be counted upon – which means nothing without someone to count on you. What good is being reliable if there is no one smart enough to give you something to rely upon.

    Intelligence is a leader.
    Reliability is a follower.

    If everyone is a follower then we go nowhere but if everyone is a leader then we are alpha’s among alphas.

    Another example is creativity as a form of intelligence. Creative people are often known for being erratic, eccentric, unpredictable, blunt, critical, and condescending but when they produce – WATCH OUT! Because the world changes in incredible ways. Would I want to be neighbors with Leonard DaVinci, Picasso , or Tim Burton (Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands, etc)? Probably not. Only without this intelligence what need would there be for reliability. It is possible to manage the craziness of intelligence to obtain invention or products to turn over to reliable people. It just isn’t easy so people turn to reliable but then they don’t have any new results.

    Creativity (a form of intelligence) comes before even the need of reliability. All current reliability is following great intelligence that came before it.

    Be intelligent first, then reliable. Both are needed.
    Signature

    Toby Jensen - Invest in what works this time

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9735247].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chaksmiths
    Intelligence
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9736946].message }}
    • is 1 a noun and the other a verb???

      1 is active, the other a state???

      just considering that.

      I can be relied upon to be there, but don't know if I can help.

      I don't know how to get there, so don't rely on me


      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9736959].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Sangfroid
      Originally Posted by chaksmiths View Post

      Intelligence

      Intelligence is great but what value is it if you
      can't get anything done.

      If you have no discipline or reliability, what can
      you accomplish?

      Be Well
      Don
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9758575].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Anish Khandelwal
    Reliability for sure
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9739542].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mrhmamun
    Of course reliability
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9739561].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Sangfroid
      Originally Posted by mrhmamun View Post

      Of course reliability
      That is how I see it.

      Of course it is nice to have a modicum of smarts.
      But I would not hire someone who was always
      late, for example. No matter now brilliant.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9751908].message }}

Trending Topics