quick formula for accountability

8 replies
I'm sure you know the power of being accountable, right?

I've done enough soul searching and self-discovery to recognize that I'm externally motivated and externally validated. That means needing other people to get jazzed and to confirm straight thinking. When you're built like that, the best way to kick-start yourself is to make sure you're connected to other folks.

So, here's the formula, then a little explanation:

==> Far + Near + Past + Feeling = Action <==

This is a tried and true formula and has been used by myself and many others to get all sorts of things done that wouldn't have happened otherwise.

In a business context, my friend and some time business partner, Donna Fox has used this with spectacular results -- for herself and for her mentees. She suggests a daily meeting for a few minutes with these components. She has a post at DonnaLFox.com/blog/?p=43 with the details of how she uses this formula.

In a productivity context, my friend and fellow NLP Trainer, Stever Robbins has guided many groups through an hourly-checkin-for-a-day version of this same formula in what he calls Action Days.

The same components are there to some degree in both of these protocols: far, past, near, feeling -- and they both generate more action than not employing these components.

Here's the breakdown on what each piece is and how it helps:

* Far -- this is a goal that is several accountability time-steps into the future. If you're meeting daily, this would be out on the week-month scale. If you're meeting hourly, it would be on the today-tomorrow scale. Declaring this piece give you a direction to focus your efforts and a "big chunk" to check against between accountability meetings. When I say I'm releasing a product on Monday, it is really easy to check against the "product release" direction and say yea-or-nay on whether my current action is adding to my movement in that direction. (And catching myself spin-locking on facebook-twitter-forums instead of writing the sales copy is totally *not* the right direction! )

* Past -- this is reporting on what has happened in the time since the last accountability meeting. Even a quick "got X and Y done, but not Z" is a valid review of the past. The mere fact that we ask "what did I get done, or not done" makes us track our results and notice what is/isn't happening. It's amazing how that small amount of tracking can put you back on track almost immediately.

* Near -- this is planning what you're going to do before the next accountability meeting. Again, just a quick "I'm going to do A, B, and hopefully C" jump starts actions. This is similar to the Far in that it sets direction, just at a more detailed level. The main difference between Far and Near is that the Far sets a more strategic or high-level direction and Near sets a more tactical or on-the-ground direction.

* Feeling -- this is where you take a moment to notice how you feel about the other components. Are you still going after the same Far and does it still have the same feelings around it? How do you feel about what you did/didn't do in the Past time frame? How excited are you by the Near actions? How will it feel to hit those Near/Far goals and be able to report that as being in the Past? (If you need explanation on how this one works, let me know. It should be pretty obvious for those it will help, and moot for those that it won't!)

So, there you go. A "formula" for getting more done with a little accountability.

==> Far + Near + Past + Feeling = Action! <==

How have you noticed these pieces in play when you've successfully used accountability to drive your own actions towards those goals that are most important to you?
#accountability #formula #quick
  • Profile picture of the author jushuaburnham
    ==> Far + Near + Past + Feeling = Action <==

    Hands down to this...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4282711].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WayneBuckhanan
      Originally Posted by jushuaburnham View Post

      ==> Far + Near + Past + Feeling = Action <==

      Hands down to this...
      I believe you're agreeing with me.
      If not, I'd especially like to hear more to see another perspective.
      If so, thanks!

      Actually, thank you either way.
      (I drink my own kool-aid when I say I want to get a handle on other points of view.)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4290146].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Susovan
    Accountability is not a result of an equation or formula. It is a sense of responsibility that comes from within and grows overtime. It’s a practice and not “ready to incorporate” element. Proper upbringing, education, parental care and domestic environment of peace, fellow feeling, adjustment and sacrifice together create an atmosphere where a child learns the art of accountability. Yes the process starts from that early infancy and cannot be instilled in one after he has spent a long time being non-accountable. We would find so many people who called “irresponsible” in work place. Don’t we? Why do these persons not follow some formula and become accountable to respective authority for everything that he does? Being accountable for what you do is not easy; you need to be humble, honest and must have the attitude to concede mistakes you made. There is no formula actually and it should be imbibed and nurtured overtime.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4284394].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WayneBuckhanan
      Interesting premise, Susovan. I don't agree that accountability or results are strictly determined by environment (past, present or future). I know that results, whether labeled ''successful'' or not, come by applying oneself and interacting with the current environment. A formula like this one is just a guide for taking action and using feedback in a way that has worked for numerous people across the globe.

      I'm curious whether you read anything in my post or are just responding to the title.

      I respectfully disagree with your argument that environment can have such a massive impact on children and then no longer have that same level of impact on adults. Do you really think that everything is static about a person once they hit the ripe old age of 16 or 23 or at some other arbitrary point in their life? If so, why would you be lurking on a forum where the premise is to sell things to improve people's lives -- you seem to think they're done developing by the time they have disposable income.

      If that is your premise, why not take it all the way back and say that a person's attributes, including their capacity for accountability, are actually genetically determines and their environment only confirms that pre-programming. Even the scientists who seem to propose this sort of pre-determination (e.g. Jacques&Cason) acknowledge that there is a developmental arc and that the trajectory and maximum capacity are what is predetermined, not a particular fixed ability or lack thereof.

      Setting aside your suggestion that parents determine a person's capacity for accountability, my ''formula'' assumes that a person is choosing, consciously, to put themselves into a position where they are using an external ''accountability partner'' to help them self-reflect. I even gave an example to start that suggests what types may self-select for this sort of accountability relationship. So, while I may agree that there are people who *won't* apply the formula, I don't agree that they are incapable of using it, just that they are unlikely to do so.

      I also wonder if your nebulous description of the ''right'' upbringing is A) necessary for the capacity of accountability, B) sufficient to guarantee resourceful use of accountability (as you've implied) and C) attainable outside of fiction. I suspect your idea of ''proper upbringing, education'' etc is a very subjective and unlike that of (now) successful people who have bootstrapped themselves from the gutter.

      Thanks for sharing. It's always good to have other perspectives in a conversation, even when (or especially when) they are ones we disagree with. (Like the grammar police who will try to fine me for dangling my participle in public.)

      Originally Posted by Susovan View Post

      Accountability is not a result of an equation or formula. It is a sense of responsibility that comes from within and grows overtime. It's a practice and not "ready to incorporate" element. Proper upbringing, education, parental care and domestic environment of peace, fellow feeling, adjustment and sacrifice together create an atmosphere where a child learns the art of accountability. Yes the process starts from that early infancy and cannot be instilled in one after he has spent a long time being non-accountable. We would find so many people who called "irresponsible" in work place. Don't we? Why do these persons not follow some formula and become accountable to respective authority for everything that he does? Being accountable for what you do is not easy; you need to be humble, honest and must have the attitude to concede mistakes you made. There is no formula actually and it should be imbibed and nurtured overtime.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4290118].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author carlpicot
    I think that all you guys are right in your own ways

    xxxxcarlxxxx
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4308650].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WayneBuckhanan
      Originally Posted by carlpicot View Post

      I think that all you guys are right in your own ways

      xxxxcarlxxxx
      Thanks Carl.
      Glad you enjoyed!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4330587].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alfredo Carrion
    What about people who just procrastinate? Where do they fit into your equation?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4331326].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WayneBuckhanan
      Originally Posted by Alfredo Carrion View Post

      What about people who just procrastinate? Where do they fit into your equation?
      Alfredo,

      While it is a bit beyond the scope of this post on accountability, here's some thoughts.

      People don't "just procrastinate." It's a matter of priority, context, personality, motivational profile, etc.

      If you aren't doing the things that someone else tells you to do, that might be procrastination or it might be a reaction to the authority or it might be that you don't really value doing it or ...
      It could be any number of things, but it is usually about something besides the task you're "procrastinating" against.

      If you aren't doing something you want to do, I'd check for three things: productive tension, motivation, and clarity.

      There are a handful of productive tension levels with different actions inherent from those levels. The two that people are most familiar with are "stress" and "apathy." If you're in stress you are taking action, but you're taking any action without regard for whether it is going to be helpful or not. If you're in apathy, you aren't doing much because you've got no "motivation" to do it. Assuming your ability stays the same, the main difference between stress and apathy is how much challenge you feel -- challenge far exceeds ability means stress, challenge well below ability means apathy.

      There are a bunch of personality traits you could look at under the umbrella of motivation, but I'm specifically thinking of the 16 factors Dr. Steven Reiss found in his research and has published in his book "Who Am I?". Basically, he found there were a small number of statistically significant factors when it came to motivating and demotivating people. There is discussion whether they are in-born or not, but either way you can use the list and a little self knowledge to know what types of things do and don't motivate you.

      Finally, I'd suggest checking on your level of clarity. If you've got the right level of challenge vs ability and it is inherently motivating, then I'd bet you either didn't know what to do or didn't know how to do it. The "how-to" is easy enough to find, and when you know your motivators you can tell what tactics you'll actually implement before you buy a course. The "what-to" is something you'll have to decide for yourself.

      One process of figuring out your own what is to go through the process of setting some goals. Don't get stuck on whether you're one of the ~70% that aren't motivated by goals. The process is more important than the outcome in this case. If you need a walkthrough on setting goals check out Six Steps for Change Goal Setting Guide or ISIS - Integral Mapping Coachware. I've used both processes (the first is obvious since it's from me!) and have gotten great clarity from each. The ISIS process is more involved and I find it more effective when coached through. The 6 Steps process is intended to be self-driven.

      Whatever you use to get it and at whatever level of detail, having that clarity is a prerequisite for the accountability formula I originally posted, which taps into a number of the motivators as well as regulating your level of productive tension to the point where you take coherent action.

      HTH
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4407998].message }}

Trending Topics