Wave To The Pilot :-)

by 14 replies
16
#off topic forum
  • Photoshop? :confused:

    Somehow the scale does not look right...
    • [1] reply
    • Its just perspective. That plane is awfully close to the building. It was taken during some boat race I believe, was reading about it on Jalopnik yesterday.
  • The guy on the balcony looks pretty calm about it all. That would have been enough to send me to the clothes laundry.
  • considering how close that is ya, I would be anything but calm. Ive seen on several occasions a trio of F-18's do flybys while spending time in Greece, and although they were much higher they were quite loud and not exactly discreet. Now imagine being waken up by that plane.
    • [1] reply
    • How old is this pix? I am trying to figure out what sort of craft this is. Obviously a two-seater. Maybe air to air? Does not look like a F-18. This baby being at a boat race is rather peculiar.
      • [1] reply


  • We used to have scenes like that many times a day at our old "Kai Tak" airport.

    Not only could the pilots see the television sets in the appartments below. They could swear they recognize the programs that the people were watching. Needless to say, it was quite a scary experience for passengers next to a window seat, especially since the aircraft had to make a sharp turn just before landing.

    Kai Tak airport was deemed the second most dangerous airport in the world but no major accident had happened there. It could be because pilots and airlines took it very seriously. Looking back, we were very lucky indeed.

    Derek
  • I'm pretty sure this was Maverick, buzzing the tower again.

    Also, as photoshop'd as this pic below seems, I honeymooned in St. Martin, and the runway is really this close to a beach. Crazy.

  • the guy on the balcony probably didnt have time to be anything but cool about it.

    That jet was probably hundreds of miles away by the time something registered that a jet just buzzed him and something was running down his leg
    • [1] reply
  • On the F18, it has a wingspan of about 37-40 feet. With the scale of that picture(based on standard housing practices, and confirmed by a human's average height, and the person out there, the wings look to be 30-31 feet! That plane is VERY close! Further, it looks like it is moving AWAY from the building, so it was CLOSER!

    That 747 picture, by contrast, is no where NEAR that F18. 747s are HUGE! From the bottom of the picture, I figure the 747 is probably about 200+ feet in the air. The building on the near left is probably 50-60 feet tall. The buildings off in the distance are obviously quite large. The entire 747 is about 231 feet long. Though I doubt the road in the center is that wide, I ALSO doubt the buildings in the far off distance are 38 feet wide. So the plane isn't all that close.

    And I've been close to a military jet on the ground starting to take off.(The air national guard takes off from a runway used by an airport I use) I SWEAR the building shook. I don't think I would have been comfortable on a balcony like that. YIKES!

    Steve
  • go look out on youtube. There are some insanely low fly overs on film. There are a couple from the middle east where f16's blow over a ridge that an army squad is patrolling. You can see the f16 enter the valley a the base of the ridge then he disappears and seconds later he comes over top of the ridge where the soldiers are and he's so close to the ground that the wind from him passing over blows dust and one soldier's unsecured helmet off.

    I dont know if he did it on purpose or not, thats pretty damn close even for a fighter. He probably had a pucker factor of about 10 on that pass
  • That crosswind landing, I would have to admit, was the coolest plane landing Ive ever seen.
    • [1] reply
    • A Kai Tak approach was never an easy thing. I remember once at landing there was an object on the runway. I was on a Cathay Pacific flight. I think we came from London that time.

      We touched down with the back wheels and went off in the air straight away. They call it "touch and go" during test flights. It is one procedure the pilots have to be good at. There can be objects on the runway unknowingly without the Air Traffic Controllers even knowing about it.

      Strangely enough this same thing happened to me another time at landing at Sydney Airport after a TransPacific on a United 747-400. I can't remember if it was from LAX or San Francisco. We touched down and then were off one second later.

      Objects on runways can be extremely dangerous and cause crashes.

      Another uneasy airport is Mahe in the Seychelles Islands. The mountains are right at you when you are landing. There is no question of missing or you will hit.

      YouTube - Boeing 767 Flightdeck view landing in Seychelles

Next Topics on Trending Feed