Starbucks and "Race Together"

149 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Obviously executives at Starbucks have way to much time of their hands.

The company effort, which began this week, lit up social media, drawing criticism and skepticism. The attacks grew so hostile that Corey duBrowa, the senior vice president of global communications at Starbucks, temporarily deleted his Twitter account on Monday.
The fury and confusion boiled down to a simple question: What was Starbucks thinking?
Gwen Ifill, the co-anchor of PBS NewsHour, wrote in a tweet on Tuesday: "Honest to God, if you start to engage me in a race conversation before I've had my morning coffee, it will not end well."

Starbucks Initiative on Race Relations Draws Attacks Online

I would recommend that people avoid Starbucks but I go so infrequently myself. (Bad, overpriced coffee with the thrill of being herded while being told that this is an "experirence".)

Ahh, no thanks. I'll leave the stupid execs at Dumb-bucks to their "Initiatives". I will stop by Dunkin for a morning coffee...


Joe Mobley
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    There are three ways to "talk" about this......
    1. Say others are the whole problem, and a given person of a given race can't get ahead because some other race is holding his race down! OK, as far as I am concerned, this is an intentional intent to create social discord, and is downright equivalent to manslaughter or murder, as it DOES often lead to that at some point.
    2. Say the TRUTH, which people don't seem to want to hear, and it may target YOU for death, see above!
    3. Stay silent.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950017].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author AprilCT
      So instead of baristas, they were trying to turn their wait staff into "opinionistas"? They won't bother me with this, I refuse to pay $4 for a cup of coffee. I make specialty iced coffees at home during the summer for a heck of a lot less and don't have to drive somewhere to get one.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950149].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
        Originally Posted by AprilCT View Post

        So instead of baristas, they were trying to turn their wait staff into "opinionistas"? They won't bother me with this, I refuse to pay $4 for a cup of coffee. I make specialty iced coffees at home during the summer for a heck of a lot less and don't have to drive somewhere to get one.
        Me too. But I find that Starbucks doesn't charge $4 for a grande pike. That's about $1.75. The $4 is for those 6-name "trendy" coffees - which I personally never considered coffee

        But I digress.

        I could care less about any corporations policies, politics, etc. I hit Starbucks when I have a need for coffee and there happens to be one close by. Otherwise, I prefer my own home brewed coffee.
        Signature

        Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950578].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      There are three ways to "talk" about this......
      1. Say others are the whole problem, and a given person of a given race can't get ahead because some other race is holding his race down! OK, as far as I am concerned, this is an intentional intent to create social discord, and is downright equivalent to manslaughter or murder, as it DOES often lead to that at some point.
      2. Say the TRUTH, which people don't seem to want to hear, and it may target YOU for death, see above!
      3. Stay silent.

      Steve
      Wisdom from a man who idolizes Rush Limbaugh...
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950553].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

        Wisdom from a man who idolizes Rush Limbaugh...
        And a statement from a guy that INTENTIONALLY tries to make me look like everything I am not EVEN when he knows it is a lie.

        I was as I am LONG before I ever heard of rush Limbaugh, and I don't go out of my way to hear him. I moved from a market where he was on every day at lunch to one that apparently DIDN'T have him, though they do now. I don't try to listen to him at all, and generally don't. I don't subscribe to his periodicals OR website, don't generally go to his website, and never called in or sent a letter.

        NOW THEN.... At one point, OBAMA was sending me LOTS of email! Maybe HE idolizes ME! I mean he kept offering me deals! HERE is a letter from his WIFE! I never subscribed, and was always amused! It looks like they extracted my email when I visited their site once.

        Michelle Obama <info@barackobama.com> Unsubscribe


        9/25/12

        to me

        Friend --

        Barack and I wouldn't be where we are today without you.

        Your support is what's building this campaign. You've stood with Barack -- now I hope you'll take the next step.

        To say thank you, Barack is holding one last dinner with supporters before Election Day. And I hope you'll be there.

        If you chip in $5 or whatever you can, you'll be automatically entered for a chance to take part in this campaign tradition. Today only, each entry counts as two.

        These dinners have been a staple of both of Barack's campaigns -- he had the first one back in 2007.

        This is your last chance to be part of one of these dinners, so I hope you'll give it a shot:

        https://donate.barackobama.com/Dinner

        Thank you for all you're doing.

        Michelle

        P.S. -- And don't forget, we'll take care of airfare and accommodations. Just make sure you enter before midnight.
        ISN'T that nice! ALL INCLUDED!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950724].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

          And a statement from a guy that INTENTIONALLY tries to make me look like everything I am not EVEN when he knows it is a lie.

          I was as I am LONG before I ever heard of rush Limbaugh, and I don't go out of my way to hear him. I moved from a market where he was on every day at lunch to one that apparently DIDN'T have him, though they do now. I don't try to listen to him at all, and generally don't. I don't subscribe to his periodicals OR website, don't generally go to his website, and never called in or sent a letter.

          NOW THEN.... At one point, OBAMA was sending me LOTS of email! Maybe HE idolizes ME! I mean he kept offering me deals! HERE is a letter from his WIFE! I never subscribed, and was always amused! It looks like they extracted my email when I visited their site once.



          ISN'T that nice! ALL INCLUDED!

          Steve

          Sure...

          I knew it wouldn't be long before you invoked BO. Proceed governor...
          Signature

          "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950857].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
            Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

            Sure...

            I knew it wouldn't be long before you invoked BO. Proceed governor...
            ROFLMA I think you pulled out Limbaugh before he pulled out BO.

            I am not interested in having conversations about race. I don't dislike someone, or like someone for that matter, just because they're a certain color. Of the friends I have, the ones who would be first in line to offer a helping hand if I needed it are a different color than I am. But they're the best people I know in the world.

            There will always be racism to a degree. It is in our genetics. People gravitate to others that are like they are. It has always been that way, and always will be that way. To deny it is denying human nature.

            Discrimination is intellectual. People can choose to give in or not to tribal or racial inclinations. Most of us choose not to, but there are still cretins in the world.

            The biggest disservice to the effort to end racial discrimination are the people who make everything about race when it isn't.
            Signature

            The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

            Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951107].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
              Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

              ROFLMA I think you pulled out Limbaugh before he pulled out BO.

              I am not interested in having conversations about race. I don't dislike someone, or like someone for that matter, just because they're a certain color. Of the friends I have, the ones who would be first in line to offer a helping hand if I needed it are a different color than I am. But they're the best people I know in the world.

              There will always be racism to a degree. It is in our genetics. People gravitate to others that are like they are. It has always been that way, and always will be that way. To deny it is denying human nature.

              Discrimination is intellectual. People can choose to give in or not to tribal or racial inclinations. Most of us choose not to, but there are still cretins in the world.

              The biggest disservice to the effort to end racial discrimination are the people who make everything about race when it isn't.

              Unfortunately, Seasoned IS a fan of Mr. Limbaugh.

              I doubt racism in in our genetics, I think its taught more than anything else.

              I agree with your last sentence and another equally big disservice are the people trying to deny the existence of it and/or its effects.
              Signature

              "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951150].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
                Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                I doubt racism in in our genetics, I think its taught more than anything else.

                I agree with your last sentence and another equally big disservice are the people try to deny the existence of it and/or its effects.
                You're choosing to deny established social science. Ethnic nepotism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                I believe the opposite is true. Discrimination is natural, not letting natural tendencies affect our decisions is learned behavior. That is not to say that discrimination based on ethnicity is not encouraged in certain circles, it most emphatically is, and - news flash! - it is not just in one direction.

                The sooner people of all colors can rise up and admit that 'ethnic nepotism' infects everyone of any color in all directions, the sooner we can finally move past it. Though with all the animosity around the subject, and people playing the blame-game, I don't hold out much hope for that happening in the near future.
                Signature

                The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

                Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951199].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                  Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

                  You're choosing to deny established social science. Ethnic nepotism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  I believe the opposite is true. Discrimination is natural, not letting natural tendencies affect our decisions is learned behavior. That is not to say that discrimination based on ethnicity is not encouraged in certain circles, it most emphatically is, and - news flash! - it is not just in one direction.

                  The sooner people of all colors can rise up and admit that 'ethnic nepotism' infects everyone of any color in all directions, the sooner we can finally move past it. Though with all the animosity around the subject, and people playing the blame-game, I don't hold out much hope for that happening in the near future.
                  I'm not so sure its established science...

                  New Evidence That Racism Isn't 'Natural'


                  https://www.google.com/search?source...7j0l5.6966j0j7

                  Going out the way to inflict harm on someone of another group is a lot different from what you're talking about.

                  I'll add that if the USA never reestablishes itself as the premier middle class nation on the planet or at least returns to its former middle class glory - Mr. Racism will be a large part of the reason why.
                  Signature

                  "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951254].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
                    Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                    I'm not so sure its established science...
                    Of the top ten search results, nine agreed with my position, one - MAYBE - with yours:

                    I'm not a blank slater; I don't believe that we're born innocent, and only develop a dark side after bad tendencies are engrained by evil capitalists, or evil patriarchs, or evil warmongers, or evil whatevers. I think that, though we're not naturally racist, we're naturally "groupist." Evolution seems to have inclined us to readily define whole groups of people as the enemy, after which we can find their suffering, even death, very easy to countenance and even facilitate.
                    What the author says largely tracks with what I said, in different terms.

                    So there's a 90% consensus that racism is innate - does that make you a 'denier'?

                    I'll add that if the USA never reestablishes itself as the premier middle class nation on the planet or at least returns to its former middle class glory - Mr. Racism will be a large part of the reason why.
                    If the US was the 'premier middle class nation on the planet' at some point, did that not occur when racism and discrimination was more rampant and much more destructive than it is today? How does your statement make any sense? If the middle class rose during a time when discrimination was worse than it is now, how does its reestablishment hinge on a lesser amount of discrimination than there was in the past?
                    Signature

                    The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

                    Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951359].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                      Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

                      If the US was the 'premier middle class nation on the planet' at some point, did that not occur when racism and discrimination was more rampant and much more destructive than it is today? How does your statement make any sense? If the middle class rose during a time when discrimination was worse than it is now, how does its reestablishment hinge on a lesser amount of discrimination than there was in the past?
                      I would argue HERE, that, though NOT in the way he likely is trying to claim, TL is RIGHT!

                      The RACISM against whites, and specifically white MALES led to tons of regulations and crazy things that made politicians rich, made some of the rich richer, and everyone ELSE is POORER for it! The HARDEST HIT? THE MIDDLE CLASS! WHY the middle class? THINK ABOUT IT!

                      1. The POOR may APPEAR to get more money BUT, at the end of the day, inflation and other things take their toll.
                      2. The RICH get their carve outs and the like. It is the FINANCIAL equivalent of the political gerrymandering!


                      ger·ry·man·der
                      /ˈjerēˌmandər/
                      verb
                      gerund or present participle: gerrymandering

                      manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class.

                      •achieve (a result) by manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency.
                      "a total freedom to gerrymander the results they want"
                      carveout

                      1.General: Exception to a rule, severance from a unit, or a parallel or secondary agreement based on a primary agreement.

                      2.Collective bargaining: Attempt by a subgroup of workers (already represented by one union) to establish a distinct identity as a separate group and be represented by another union.

                      3.Finance: (1) Partial spinoff effected by a parent firm by selling 20 percent or less of its shareholding. This sale provides new capital (and new shareholders) to the parent which may sell off the remaining shares (called stub) at a value inflated by the carveout. (2) Creation of a new subsidiary that operates in a new market (such as online sales on the Internet) by leveraging the parent firm's core strengths such as brand recognition and distribution system.
                      And the middle class? Well, SOMEONE has to carry the brunt! And it affects ALL races in the middle class to a degree. Even SUCCESSFUL minorities will ALWAYS have the stigma of maybe having benefitted from some AA allowance.

                      Steve
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951680].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Midnight Oil
                        I've been patiently listening to all of you trying to solve world problems with the barista for twenty minutes. Can you please wrap it up so I can place my order? All I want is my damn cup of coffee so I can get to work!
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951738].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                          Banned
                          Originally Posted by Midnight Oil View Post

                          I've been patiently listening to all of you trying to solve world problems with the barista for twenty minutes. Can you please wrap it up so I can place my order? All I want is my damn cup of coffee so I can get to work!
                          lol .... that's all anyone wants is their damn cup of coffee. What was Starbucks thinking? It's still my fav coffee when I want to treat myself to expensive coffee. The thing about the price is that a lot of people drink alcohol and think nothing of a $4 cocktail or exotic beer but say they'd never pay that for a cup of coffee. It isn't a cup of coffee. It's exotic coffee and each variety they have has a different taste and aroma and I love many of them. I don't drink alcohol, so a $4-$5 cup of coffee is my "cocktail."
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951765].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Midnight Oil
                            Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                            lol .... that's all anyone wants is their damn cup of coffee. What was Starbucks thinking?
                            I know, right? I can see it becoming a service nightmare if they really push the baristas "engaging" with guests aspect. And I really don't see the inevitable heated discussions at the counter being smart marketing or good for barista job security. Seems to be a very unfair position to put the help in.

                            I don't have a problem with them following their corporate heart on social issues. I just think it would make more sense to maybe conduct community meetings with free coffee instead of pushing it instore.

                            Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                            It's still my fav coffee when I want to treat myself to expensive coffee.
                            And a really cushy couch in the corner to enjoy it.
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951888].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                      Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

                      Of the top ten search results, nine agreed with my position, one - MAYBE - with yours:

                      What the author says largely tracks with what I said, in different terms.

                      So there's a 90% consensus that racism is innate - does that make you a 'denier'?

                      If the US was the 'premier middle class nation on the planet' at some point, did that not occur when racism and discrimination was more rampant and much more destructive than it is today?

                      How does your statement make any sense? If the middle class rose during a time when discrimination was worse than it is now, how does its reestablishment hinge on a lesser amount of discrimination than there was in the past?
                      I won't bother getting into your interpretation of those search result as another wise person has already done so but I will address your question regarding race and the economic future of this country.

                      The economic and political conditions were much different back then and it didn't matter how much racism existed - the economy of the USA still flourished.

                      The national debt was sky high because of the war and that's about the only similarity to today's economic conditions but who was going to stand up and say the vets returning from the war didn't deserve something like the GI Bill and/or couldn't afford it because of the national debt?

                      Who was crazy enough to publically say we didn't need a national highway system and/or couldn't afford it because of the national debt?

                      Most/all the pols all agreed (at least publicly) that the people of this nation had just helped saved the world and deserved a chance at a greater standard of living and the federal gov was going to be helpful to that end.

                      But nowadays...

                      ... coming out of the great recession, one of our major parties is dominated by pols that are clearly not interested in nation building in any way, shape or form. (much like yourself right?)

                      At least 30% (perhaps higher) of their support is coming from folks who are clearly racists as publically demonstrated by the ignorant phenomenon of birtherism.

                      Most vote GOP simply because they been lead to believe the other party is the party of minorities and is out to help minorities at their expense.

                      Most of the rest of their support comes from people who actually believe in their economic philosophy or are voting for them out of habit - oblivious to the economic consequences.


                      Southern strategy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


                      So I say...

                      ... as long as those pols who clearly do not believe in nation building are sent to national office and continue to control at least the house of reps (where national spending originates) this nation will not reach its full economic potential.

                      Let them gain control of the house, senate and the POTUS at the same time and any gains made (for the average Joe) - while they were not in power will be striped away or attempted to be mitigated in some way.

                      --- Their agenda is to help the wealthy and large corporations and absolutely no one else.

                      Their agenda is clear for any objective person to see.


                      BTW...

                      The other party is not perfect but at least they have an active and powerful progressive wing that believes in nation building this nation - of which the modern day GOP does not.

                      Today we would call them reasonable GOP pols or Eisenhower republicans, and today Eisenhower and/or even Reagan couldn't even make it through their primaries.

                      Let me say again for the record that their economic philosophy has a horrendous historic track record when compared to the other party - and that's a fact that can't be disputed.

                      Many excuses are used to cover for their non-nation building philosophy (we need to tighten our belts, we need to stop the freeloaders, we're picking winners and losers, freedom, liberty, the constitution etc.)...

                      ...but the bottom line is they are incapable of helping this nation reach anything close to its true economic potential - simply because of their economic philosophy.

                      It it absolutely not going to happen with their economic philosophy.

                      And that's how racism can prevent this nation from reaching its true economic potential.








                      So here's my proposal to the racists of America: LOL!

                      (I'm talking about voters not the pols)

                      Continue to be racist online and in person etc., with like minded people, have your fun...

                      ...but please have the pragmatic sense to stop f***ing up the money for everyone by sending these non-national building, economic a-holes to national offices.

                      You think by sending these economic a-holes to national office, only minorities will be hurt by their policies, but their set of policies will hurt everyone including your own family members, friends and their children's prospects also - for the short, medium and long term.

                      You can still be racist all you want but why hold your nose to spite your won face by sending people to national offices who will - without a doubt work at f***ing up the money for everyone also?


                      Short Story Time:

                      This short story will illustrate what I mean by some people having the necessary pragmatism to help this nation move forward economically.

                      When #44 was running in the POTUS general election of 2008, his people were canvassing a neighborhood.

                      They go to a home in Pennsylvania, knock on the door and a caucasian woman in her late 50s maybe early 60s answers the door.

                      They politely inquire as to who the people of the home were leaning toward supporting in the upcoming election.

                      The wife shouts to her husband, hey honey, who are we voting for and the husband shouts back...

                      "we're voting for the N-WORD".

                      Now why would a person who's clearly a racist vote for someone for the highest office in the land who - he didn't like - just because of his race?

                      Because its about the money.
                      Signature

                      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952970].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                        You can still be racist all you want but why hold your nose to spite your won face by sending people to national offices who will - without a doubt work at f***ing up the money for everyone also?
                        Where do you get off calling other people racist in thread after thread? Could it be YOU are the racist here? "F this and F that" - and then you go to politics and because you are playing the race card you seem to get by with it. Doesn't it get tiring being defensive and assuming the worst of everyone else all the time?

                        It's sad that no one can have a discussion here recently without being attacked by one of 3-4 people. It's sad forum moderators don't enforce the rules for everyone - but only for some. Whatever - this place is going down faster than we can prop it up.
                        Signature
                        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                        ***
                        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952986].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                          Where do you get off calling other people racist in thread after thread? Could it be YOU are the racist here? "F this and F that" - and then you go to politics and because you are playing the race card you seem to get by with it. Doesn't it get tiring being defensive and assuming the worst of everyone else all the time?

                          It's sad that no one can have a discussion here recently without being attacked by one of 3-4 people. It's sad forum moderators don't enforce the rules for everyone - but only for some. Whatever - this place is going down faster than we can prop it up.

                          I normally ignore you but...


                          First of all I did not call anyone in here racist.


                          and...


                          Are you denying that there are racists in this country?


                          That's who I'm talking about.
                          Signature

                          "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952990].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                            Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                            I normally ignore you but...


                            First of all I did not call anyone in here racist.


                            and...


                            Are you denying that there are racists in this country?


                            That's who I'm talking about.
                            She can read English. You might not have used the word, WHO KNOWS, but you made it CLEAR!

                            And denying the scope or a particular circumstance or link does NOT deny existence! Is there racism, sexism, etc.... OF COURSE! YOU KNOW WHAT? IT EXISTS EVERYWHERE! But the scope in the US is NOT as broad as you claim. HAVE I HEARD racists? YEP!

                            A classmate, over 40 years ago, once found a copy of "the fiery cross" at a local donutshop. I once heard some apartment managers speaking up a racist storm. I have heard a couple such things at a school, from students. I certainly hear a TON against whites. But have I EVER seen a copy of the fiery cross ANYWHERE else, or knowingly met a KKK member, or constantly been exposed to such things? NOPE! Is there a male or white club complete with special privileges? If there is, I could name THOUSANDS that don't know about it, and probably give you a list of MILLIONS! The person at the top of the list would be ME!

                            Steve
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953274].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                          Where do you get off calling other people racist in thread after thread? Could it be YOU are the racist here?

                          "F this and F that" - and then you go to politics and because you are playing the race card you seem to get by with it. Doesn't it get tiring being defensive and assuming the worst of everyone else all the time?

                          It's sad that no one can have a discussion here recently without being attacked by one of 3-4 people. It's sad forum moderators don't enforce the rules for everyone - but only for some. Whatever - this place is going down faster than we can prop it up.

                          I demand that you show me in what I've written above that calls anyone in here a racist.
                          Signature

                          "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953007].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                            You don't get to make demands of me - you can read your own words. It doesn't help solve any problem when the go to is always anger and racism. It never will and that's sad.
                            Signature
                            Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                            ***
                            One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                            what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953015].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                              Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                              You don't get to make demands of me - you can read your own words. It doesn't help solve any problem when the go to is always anger and racism. It never will and that's sad.
                              OK, I respectfully request that you simply and easily copy and paste what I have written in this thread that has called someone in here a racist.

                              If you can't or won't that would also be very sad for you because you would have failed to back up a major charge you have chosen to lob at me.
                              Signature

                              "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953032].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
                              Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                              You don't get to make demands of me -
                              I'm kind-of not surprised about that. I suspect that is probably not limited to TL.

                              Joe Mobley
                              Signature

                              .

                              Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9954086].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
                                Nor should it since they already have an advantage. Thats the point. A group that has had an unfair disadvantage is being given a period of time where an advantage is being given to help even things out.
                                Classic thinking of a black, racist, bigot.

                                Joe Mobley
                                Signature

                                .

                                Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9954103].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                                  Glad I don't go to Starbucks if this is the type of dialogue "Race Together" creates.
                                  Signature

                                  Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                                  Getting old ain't for sissy's
                                  As you are I was, as I am you will be
                                  You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9954127].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                                  Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                                  Classic thinking of a black, racist, bigot.

                                  Joe Mobley
                                  Ridiculous. One of the worst posts I have seen you make, Joe. There's nothing racist or bigoted about what he said.
                                  Signature
                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9954174].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
                                    Tim,

                                    Actually I appreciated this post. While we disagree on the topic, you stated your opinion without verbally "going postal". I can respect that.

                                    Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                                    Ridiculous. One of the worst posts I have seen you make, Joe. There's nothing racist or bigoted about what he said.
                                    Joe Mobley
                                    Signature

                                    .

                                    Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955209].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
                                    Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                                    There's nothing racist or bigoted about what he said.
                                    How someone can look at this statement and not see the thinking behind it, escapes me.

                                    Nor should it since they already have an advantage. Thats the point. A group that has had an unfair disadvantage is being given a period of time where an advantage is being given to help even things out.


                                    With little tweaking, this entitlement philosophy is the foundation for the black on white racism that is popular in the media today.


                                    Joe Mobley
                                    Signature

                                    .

                                    Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955249].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                      Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                                      How someone can look at this statement and not see the thinking behind it, escapes me.......With little tweaking, this entitlement philosophy is the foundation for the black on white racism that is popular in the media today.
                                      lol.... Joe at his drop down silliest. Thats why I won't put him on ignore. he's just too entertaining

                                      He thinks the fact that he claims he hasn't read my post somehow gets him out of his supreme goof of making a claim against me when in fact not reading something but drawing a conclusion from what one has not bothered to read is a very old definition of a fool and exhibits intellectual dishonesty. Surely if a decent human being is going to claim someone is a racist and bigot, base level integrity, if they possessed it, would require they actually read what they are claiming is racist.

                                      Mind you every time he quotes me from Yukon's quote he strips out the reference to women to claim its a statement about race but it just adds to the hilarity

                                      You just can't get this level of entertainment and dark "humanity" anywhere else folks. Its vintage OT.

                                      Meanwhile as all will recall the subject was SBA loans. You CANNOT just go in and get one because you are a black or a woman. You have to present a business plan and show you can pay back the money. categorizing that as an "entitlement" just goes to show how deep the Racist hate reaches. This only goes to show how racists use the terms "entitlement" and "race baiting". They use the words even in context where the definitions are betrayed by the actual situation.
                                      Signature

                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955269].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author discrat
                                  Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                                  Classic thinking of a black, racist, bigot.

                                  Joe Mobley
                                  That's a little harsh, Joe.

                                  For me I have been back and forth with Affirmative Action. There is not question it is reverse discrimination.
                                  You just cannot deny it.

                                  But then again, growing up in the South all my Life there is absolutely no question the Managers and Business owners I ran into would NEVER hire a black person, regardless of their qualifications , unless they were forced to do so.

                                  That is just the reality in some areas of US]

                                  Its really sad.
                                  Signature

                                  Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9954205].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                                    Originally Posted by discrat View Post


                                    But then again, growing up in the South all my Life there is absolutely no question the Managers and Business owners I ran into would NEVER hire a black person, regardless of their qualifications , unless they were forced to do so.

                                    That is just the reality in some areas of US
                                    That's your problem Robert, you want to deal with reality, while some like to adhear to some sort of fairy tail belief that racism magically ended when slavery did, and that someone who says racism now is still a problem is racist.

                                    The truth is this country was a state sponsored white supremacist country for a couple centuries. Thats an indisputable fact. To complain about a few decades where the government has tried to
                                    right these centuries of racism and white privilege is just shortsighted and simple minded at the least.

                                    Anyone who denies white privilege had widespread existence for centuries, it's effects linger on now and still exist in many ways is imo either:

                                    A. Ignorant of the facts
                                    B. In denial
                                    C. Lying
                                    Signature
                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9954259].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                                      Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                                      That's your problem Robert, you want to deal with reality, while some like to adhear to some sort of fairy tail belief that racism magically ended when slavery did, and that someone who says racism now is still a problem is racist.

                                      The truth is this country was a state sponsored white supremacist country for a couple centuries. Thats an indisputable fact. To complain about a few decades where the government has tried to
                                      right these centuries of racism and white privilege is just shortsighted and simple minded at the least.

                                      Anyone who denies white privilege had widespread existence for centuries, it's effects linger on now and still exist in many ways is imo either:

                                      A. Ignorant of the facts
                                      B. In denial
                                      C. Lying

                                      Tim, this thread has been most interesting.


                                      - Steve J. claims that its established science that... racism is wired into our brains.

                                      I understand there's a natural preference for many preferences but I think he's getting preferences mixed up with outright, ugly racism which is a whole other can of worms.

                                      - Then there are those that seem to want to deny America's historic racism towards blacks and/or claim the effects of it have long passed - so its not really a big deal.

                                      - Of course there are black racists along with the white ones but I think its safe to say that blacks have suffered a lot more than whites because of racism.

                                      - I've been accused of calling people in here racist over and over by Kay. With ThomM and JoeMobely thanking her for the post.

                                      Within the last 3-5 months, after a post I made about how (IMHO) racism helped propel BO into the WH, Seasoned tried to get anyone to say the post was hateful but Joe Mobely publically refused and also said he didn't detect any facetiousness at all in my post.

                                      I guess something has changed.

                                      ThomM also can't say I've ever called anyone in here a racist but I have pointed out on numerous occasions that he and others in here,...

                                      ... share the same economic philosophy as someone like Rush Limbaugh...

                                      ... and if nothing else, that alone really should give them cause to pause - regarding their stance on many economic issues.

                                      But with some folks I guess that's the same as calling them racist. (They shouldn't be so sensitive)

                                      - With some folks, simply pointing out racism is racism itself.

                                      - SteveJ also wanted to know how racism could prevent America from returning to the middle class powerhouse it was during the post WW2 boom. He said since it didn't stop us then how does it make any sense now?

                                      I explained that racism didn't matter then but it matters now - ...

                                      ...simply because of the different economic circumstances and especially the different economic mentality of the modern day pols that racists are likely to vote for and help send to national office -...

                                      ... as I pointed out that a large part of the support of the party on the right comes from people who surely could be considered racist by any stretch of the imagination.

                                      - SteveJ also pointed out that people who shout racism like the boy who cried wolf are doing a lot of harm and I agreed but he choose not respond to me saying folks that try to dismiss racism are doing a lot of harm also.

                                      - I also offered the racists of America a bargain, pleading with them be pragmatic enough to stop sending economic idiots to national offices that (because of their economic philosophy)...

                                      ... are, will and intend on seriously harming the economy and prospects for everyone.

                                      I offered that they can still hate all they want, but to please stop F***ing up the money for everyone.

                                      - Suzanne spoke about how racism has divided her family in some ways.


                                      BTW...

                                      - Foreigners should not infer by these threads that Americans are walking through our daily lives engulfed in personal racial incidents. That is not the case.

                                      And of course...

                                      - Seasoned chimed in with his usual non-productive, blather mentioning blacks on youtube who talk about killing whitey and something about all conversations on race eventually leading to kill all the whites - etc.

                                      He's quite inflammatory to say the least. I still think he needs the help of a gal to show him some kindness and maybe...
                                      Signature

                                      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955016].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                      Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                                      T
                                      Anyone who denies white privilege had widespread existence for centuries, it's effects linger on now and still exist in many ways is imo either:

                                      A. Ignorant of the facts
                                      B. In denial
                                      C. Lying
                                      Great post. Option A should not be surprising. If you are not a minority and don't have any family that's a minority racism received has always been "their" issue so how would you really know the effects on the receiving end if you neve thought about it? People like Kay have this continued attitude that hey its over because they really have never applied themselves to understanding what racism actually does and has done on the receiving end and frankly in my opinion don't give a rip anyway.

                                      Let me use an unlikely example - Paris Hilton.

                                      I think most people would concede that Paris is undeserving of her status and attention in society. The reason she does have her present place is in no small part derived from who she was born to and who they were born to. Wealth can and has been passed down for several generations AND IT SHOULD BE (lest any of the closet types misread that too). You start a striving successful business then your children OUGHT to derive benefit. However it illustrates how advantages are almost never lost in a few decades or only within a generation or two. Neither Paris or even her grandchildren are likely to lose that advantage

                                      If it works for wealth then why should it work any different for poverty? If a generation or two or three ago a Hilton were black and not able to even conceive of starting a hotel chain or even prohibited from starting that or any kind of business Paris would conceivably be disadvantaged by it.

                                      This doesn't mean that Paris would now be worthy of sitting on her rumpus and doing nothing but complaining. However it sure does not make it "BS" if someone says hey Paris given your family was disadvantaged by racism we'll give you some money from the SBA to get off your rumpus and start a business if you have a good business plan

                                      Why should Men (in the case of alleged gender bias)or non racially discriminated against families get compensation for discrimination they never experienced? They've had generations as families to build something for themselves without unfair discrimination to stop them so can look only to their own families' as fault.
                                      Signature

                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955100].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                    Originally Posted by discrat View Post

                                    For me I have been back and forth with Affirmative Action. There is not question it is reverse discrimination.
                                    You just cannot deny it.
                                    A great deal of the black community has never felt comfortable with it despite the claims of some that blacks are looking for handouts. If you think about it many African Americans have held it in derision with the term "token" (non complimentary) for decades.

                                    The problem with these issues is it s hard to determine when someone has been turned down for a job so AA was a way of addressing that. Its not my favorite solution and frankly I think its now out lived its usefulness as the way of addressing the situation but I can't deny there's something fishy about a large company having say a hundred people in management and they just never came across any other race but white worthy of the position.
                                    Signature

                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955033].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                  Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                                  Classic thinking of a black, racist, bigot.

                                  Joe Mobley
                                  See? You only have to talk long enough to a racist to make them step out the closet and hang themselves with their own white sheet. its now politically incorrect to identify as a racist so the back up position of closet racists is to cry shut up to anyone that claims race may still be a factor in some situations

                                  Originally Posted by TimPhelan

                                  Ridiculous. One of the worst posts I have seen you make, Joe. There's nothing racist or bigoted about what he said.
                                  the amusing thing about it for anyone who can actually read is that it was in response to the portion of Yuke's statement about WOMEN receiving advantages. I deliberately skirted the race example and went to the gender issue but hey when the BLACK (using seasoned's favorite caps) guy says something that if applied to race might anger a racist his low level IQ has to take it only as a reference to race.
                                  Signature

                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955010].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                        Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                        Insert appropriate twaddle from TL here!.
                        OK, I get a big laugh how you even find sites to support your weird sense of history. And I got publicly reprimanded by stating the truth about site preferences, but thank you for constantly affirming it. Others can figure it out.

                        And it is interesting how you will point out things like this but NEVER mention BYRD! Why do you guys NEVER mention Robert? Is it because he "served" TOO long? Is it because, in 1997, he told an interviewer he would encourage young people to become involved in politics but also warned, "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan. Don't get that albatross around your neck. Once you've made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena.

                        OK, YOU may read that differently, but how I parse the language, he is saying that he LIKES the KKK, and it is great, but that, IF YOU RUN FOR OFFICE, you shouldn't do it because it will "inhibit your operations in the political arena". THAT coming from a guy that was in office longer than any other when he died, and this association was RARELY mentioned!

                        OH, OH OH! I GET IT! HE WAS TOO YOUNG! I mean he left before he was 81yo!

                        Steve
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953259].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                  Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

                  You're choosing to deny established social science. Ethnic nepotism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  I believe the opposite is true. Discrimination is natural, not letting natural tendencies affect our decisions is learned behavior. That is not to say that discrimination based on ethnicity is not encouraged in certain circles, it most emphatically is, and - news flash! - it is not just in one direction.

                  The sooner people of all colors can rise up and admit that 'ethnic nepotism' infects everyone of any color in all directions, the sooner we can finally move past it. Though with all the animosity around the subject, and people playing the blame-game, I don't hold out much hope for that happening in the near future.
                  ETHNIC NEPOTISM! I LIKE THAT! YEAH, ideally, if two people were equally qualified for a job, a person may be more likely to pick someone like themselves. But that would be ****A**** deciding factor at the END, and certainly not THE deciding factor. People have gotten to where they will call a company racist if everyone seems to be white. Sometimes it just happens that way. And for an organization like MALDEF, most will likely be mexican. For BET, probably BLACK. WHY? MAYBE racism, maybe just the applicants. And they may say sexist if they are all the same sex. GEE, parents feel safer with young kids around women, and most willing to teach young kids in school are women so historically it HAS been that way. Is that sexist? MOST truck drivers have been male.

                  And YEAH, the blame game doesn't help.

                  Steve
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951262].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author discrat
                  Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

                  You're choosing to deny established social science. Ethnic nepotism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  I believe the opposite is true. Discrimination is natural , not letting natural tendencies affect our decisions is learned behavior. That is not to say that discrimination based on ethnicity is not encouraged in certain circles, it most emphatically is, and - news flash! - it is not just in one direction.

                  The sooner people of all colors can rise up and admit that 'ethnic nepotism' infects everyone of any color in all directions, the sooner we can finally move past it. Though with all the animosity around the subject, and people playing the blame-game, I don't hold out much hope for that happening in the near future.

                  One of the most dangerous things that I have learned and been a witness to in my almost 50 years of Living is ...when people feel so naturally strong about an ideology to a degree that they think everyone else MUST also feel the same way .

                  Pure folly and has been the downfall of many individuals !
                  Signature

                  Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951312].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Claude Whitacre
                  Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

                  You're choosing to deny established social science. Ethnic nepotism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  I believe the opposite is true. Discrimination is natural, not letting natural tendencies affect our decisions is learned behavior. That is not to say that discrimination based on ethnicity is not encouraged in certain circles, it most emphatically is, and - news flash! - it is not just in one direction.
                  It's unpleasant to agree with such an idea. It goes against many of our cultural ideals. But I agree.

                  What I mean is that anyone that isn't part of our tribe, is pushed away. It is a natural tendency. I don't know if it's truly in our DNA, but it is historically, how we react.

                  And not just because of color. Take any tribe; A country, religion, sports team, fraternity, a town, a culture, a language.....it's a matter of survival to stick together. And anything different, is a threat.

                  Children aren't like that. They just see different people as fascinating. But adults see different people as a threat to their way of life, and act accordingly. It may be testosterone, genes, I have no idea. But it happens.

                  The good news is that as time goes on, and world communication is easier, these differences are perceived less as a threat, and more as something more to learn.

                  Remember when it was a real scandal, when people of different races married? I was an adult then too. A white man, kissing a black girl on the lips was enough to start fights. Remember the argument, "The children will suffer"?

                  Now? In most areas, this isn't even given a thought...except by ignorant old white men. And we'll be dead soon.

                  Progress is slow, because bigots have to die, to make room for more educated people...but it's happening.

                  There is a real Us Against Them mentality. It used to be a matter of survival. Now, not so much. Maybe that will go away. I doubt it. But it can sure become less popular. We can make it less attractive.

                  And it wastes so much energy.
                  Signature
                  One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

                  What if they're not stars? What if they are holes poked in the top of a container so we can breath?
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956636].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                    Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

                    And not just because of color. Take any tribe; A country, religion, sports team, fraternity, a town, a culture, a language.....it's a matter of survival to stick together. And anything different, is a threat.
                    Actually that has been proven incorrect. There are quite a few societies where differences are not noticed much particularly in reference to color. Anything outside of the majority is not considered a threat. That even shows itself here in the US. In South Florida for example Hispanics identify as Hispanics under one umbrella regardless of skin color . Your examples actually shows how wrong you and Steve are. Religious groups are based on solidarity of belief. Sports teams can embrace multiple differences.Nationalism can and does in many countries outweigh other differences. equating these things to racism is flawed thinking. If anything they show we have a tendency to come together despite differences not identify anything different as a threat.

                    Besides racism has never had anything to do with threat. Its a completely different dynamic. No one brings millions of "threats" over the middle passage to their own land if they consider them threats. Racism is based on assumed supremacy almost the opposite of threat - a sense that "We are better because".

                    There is no confirmed science behind Steve's position. Anecdotal references to already racist affected societies really doesn't tell us anything except over generations people construct norms.
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956716].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                Unfortunately, Seasoned IS a fan of Mr. Limbaugh.

                I doubt racism in in our genetics, I think its taught more than anything else.

                I agree with your last sentence and another equally big disservice are the people trying to deny the existence of it and/or its effects.
                CONGRATS! You happened along one of those, to borrow a term, "inconvenient truths" I was talking about! Racism ISN'T in genetics! Some people, claiming others are racist, say racism is about hatred of people that aren't like you. There are PLENTY of people that aren't like me. Some have darker skin, some lighter. Some have darker eyes, some lighter. Some harrier, some not as harry. Some taller, some not so tall. Some thinner, some not so thin. Etc.... You know what? It doesn't matter to me, and never has. For what it is worth, rush seems to be the same in that regard.

                And I NEVER denied the existence of racism. I simply deny that it is like it is made out today or that it is all from one source or against one target.

                Steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951253].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author discrat
                Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                I doubt racism in in our genetics, I think its taught more than anything else.

                I agree with your last sentence and another equally big disservice are the people trying to deny the existence of it and/or its effects.
                Yes, it is a ludicrous statement to say racism is in our DNA makeup.
                One of the most ridiculous statements I have heard here in OT in a long time
                Signature

                Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951305].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
                  Originally Posted by discrat View Post

                  Yes, it is a ludicrous statement to say racism is in our DNA makeup.
                  One of the most ridiculous statements I have heard here in OT in a long time
                  The majority of social scientists disagree with you. Guess that makes you a denier too, eh?

                  The sooner that people acknowledge that tribalism is built-in to our nature, the sooner we will be able to move past it through conscious suppression of its tendencies.

                  Saying that "it's in our nature" is not saying that it cannot be suppressed. But if you don't admit that it's lurking there, how can you be aware enough to recognize what is happening when it shows itself?

                  It would be helpful if people would educate themselves a little before labeling things as 'ridiculous' and 'ludicrous' based on uneducated opinion.
                  Signature

                  The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

                  Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951378].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author HeySal
                Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post


                I doubt racism in in our genetics, I think its taught more than anything else.
                It is and it isn't. Humans are tribal by brain wiring. That means anything that holds the tribe together as one. Tribes of all one race will tend to be racial. Tribes of one religion are bigoted on matters of religion, and etc. So if you have a tribe or "community" of 3 or 4 races of people, racism won't be their problem. It will be religion, education, money or other social esteem factors, etc.

                As pointed out, many of these prejudices can be overcome. It would happen a lot faster if our politicians didn't use any difference between us as fodder for their own agendas and campaigns. We don't need to "talk about it" all the time - we're integrated enough that things would happen on their own without all the unrest if it were left alone.

                We're at a point of time that women, blacks, hispanics are doctors, teachers, lawyers, politicians. We can do this without political "help". Women need to stop having babies without daddies. Daddy's need to take care of the children they spawn. Women of every race can expect to live in poverty if they're having babies without daddies - and they can expect troubled kids. Women need to get off men for being polite. A man who opens a door for her isn't being degrading, he's being polite. I open the door for men if they have their hands full and have never been accused of calling him a "puss" for it. Immigrants need to stop expecting red carpet treatment and understand that if they come here, they need to pay their own way. We don't get hospitalized free, why do they expect it? 2 whites are wrongfully killed by police to every black - yet the campaign is for "black lives" -- it should be "citizen lives" matter when our police force has gone over the lines.

                We don't need to talk about shyte from shinola - we just need people to stop feeling that they are different. If people start expecting the same treatment as everyone else according to how they act as a human, we wouldn't have so many problems. This rift that we've allowed to be built is allowing our politicians to take us all to the cleaners. It's time to just stop it.

                As far as Starbucks - I don't drink poison laced anything. Their coffee is not organic, it's got pesticides in it. The first time that crap is washed off is when water is poured into your cup of coffee. I think they stopped using milk with Bhst but are subing it with something else fake instead of just using real milk and real cream. So....until they go organic -- I'll drink my coffee at home and make it with my own latte machine. They can run their mouths any way they want - I'm not a customer so don't have to listen to their stupid crap.
                Signature

                Sal
                When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
                Beyond the Path

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956992].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      OK, as far as I am concerned, this is an intentional intent to create social discord, and is downright equivalent to manslaughter or murder

      Steve
      Ha ha ... so some conversation about race with a barista is equivalent to manslaughter or murder. Gotcha. lol
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950560].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

        Ha ha ... so some conversation about race with a barista is equivalent to manslaughter or murder. Gotcha. lol
        It isn't that a conversation happened, but what it is likely going to be. HECK, one program did a show about how a black was denied a job at a place, sued for discrimination, won, and the place went under. OK, OK, I know what you are thinking, THEY WERE FILTHY WHITE RACISTS! Well, I don't know the color of their skin. Maybe they WERE white! They probably were. Another color Is involved, but I will get to that!

        The area was half Mexican and half black, and their company reflected that. They said they simply didn't have reason to hire anyone else. As for the other color? They DID have blue tattoos, because they were holocaust survivors. Even THEY weren't free of the PC garbage!

        https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...ack+white+hate

        I have seen plenty of blacks on youtube saying they would and/or others should kill whites. But HEY, look at Reginald denny and the riots, etc....

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950746].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          I would recommend that people avoid Starbucks but I go so infrequently myself.
          I've never been in a Starbucks or had their coffee, so O.K.
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950865].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
            Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

            I've never been in a Starbucks or had their coffee, so O.K.
            As someone who has spent the better part of a career on the road, you take the coffee where you can get it. Starbucks isn't bad - but I don't find it all that great either. I don't go out of my way for it.
            Signature

            Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950898].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
              Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

              As someone who has spent the better part of a career on the road, you take the coffee where you can get it. Starbucks isn't bad - but I don't find it all that great either. I don't go out of my way for it.
              I actually don't drink much coffee when I travel. Just a couple of cups with my meals. Locally (and I use that term loosely) I always go to Stewarts. I don't have anything against Starbucks, just never been in one.
              Signature

              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
              Getting old ain't for sissy's
              As you are I was, as I am you will be
              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950976].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                I actually don't drink much coffee when I travel. Just a couple of cups with my meals. Locally (and I use that term loosely) I always go to Stewarts. I don't have anything against Starbucks, just never been in one.

                Stewarts has some good coffee. There's a few not too far from me - just not close enough to make it convenient...
                Signature

                Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951034].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                  Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

                  Stewarts has some good coffee. There's a few not too far from me - just not close enough to make it convenient...
                  I'm pretty sure Stewarts puts something addictive in their coffee (besides caffeine) They're thick as flies around here, but then they did get their start here. Their ice cream is also good.
                  It's funny when we go on our Sunday rides. I won't have a clue as to where we are until I see a Stewarts.
                  In fact I think I remember telling you that Hunter Mt. (or Woodstock) was two Stewarts stops away from here
                  Signature

                  Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                  Getting old ain't for sissy's
                  As you are I was, as I am you will be
                  You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951080].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Alright....Reverend MA is here... break this up....move along people nothing to see here

      (seriously though the starbucks saga looks blown up on both sides to me. Not the greatest idea of theirs but meh bit much blow up in response to me)

      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      OK, as far as I am concerned, this is an intentional intent to create social discord, and is downright equivalent to manslaughter or murder,
      alrighty then...Death penalty by white sheets and burning crosses to them all.

      There will always be racism to a degree. It is in our genetics.
      So our DNA ultimately instructs us to overlook eye and hair color and concentrate just on skin color? Alrighty then two

      Of the top ten search results, nine agreed with my position, one - MAYBE - with yours:
      Science by Google results? Alrighty then three

      BTW you missed a few in his search results - Its not nine out of ten and you are cherry picking your "science". Studies have shown the tendencies don't kick in until teens and is dependent on social experience not genes.

      Racism: Is It Inherent or Learned?

      http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/...1#.VQsot-EYlGk
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951434].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author discrat
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post




        So our DNA ultimately instructs us to overlook eye and hair color and concentrate just on skin color? Alrighty then two



        BTW you missed a few in his search results - Its not nine out of ten and you are cherry picking your "science". Studies have shown the tendencies don't kick in until teens and is dependent on social experience not genes.

        Racism: Is It Inherent or Learned?


        An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie
        Eff you Mike Anthony You took the words right of my mouth for my next post here.

        But you know I think Steve does have a point. Steve, when I was in the second grade there were two twins in my class, a boy and girl. Me and my best friend at the time did not want to associate with them because they had abnormally big noses.

        So yeah the DNA thing about wanting to be with alike groups you talk about is so true
        Signature

        Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951482].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author More Than Tips
    You never know...someone in any position...and I mean any position in any business may wake up on any given day..turn on the tube or read the papers and say..what can I do?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950387].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by More Than Tips View Post

      You never know...someone in any position...and I mean any position in any business may wake up on any given day..turn on the tube or read the papers and say..what can I do?
      Yeah, and they get a lot of DRECK! If the conversation isn't honest, WHY HAVE IT? You want opinion and "PC" arguments? Look on you tube. SOME even have "the final solution"! KILL ALL WHITES! YEAH, THAT will do it!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950711].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    Well, I love Starbucks coffee and Starbucks cafes, and never intend to discuss race relations or anything at all with a barista, but I won't stop loving Starbucks because of an ill-conceived campaign.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9950516].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951190].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    I can only relay my own personal experience. My mother was the least racist person I've ever met. My father was influenced by her, but also by his bigot family members. Around us and my mother, we never heard a racist comment from him, but since she has died, and since Obama was elected, he let some of it come to the surface and was duly shamed by his immediate family (he does have two mixed great grandchildren that he loves, and I won't tolerate any racist remarks around my children or grandchildren).

    I was born in Baltimore. We lived in the suburbs. The school I went to was all white. The neighborhood also. My mother would take us places in Baltimore City and that was the first time I was exposed to the fact that there were people who were a different color. I was curious and discussed it with my mother. Over the years, both my brother and I were greatly influenced by her in terms of racism.

    My fathers side of the family, as I said, are flaming bigots. That created a divide in our family. His mother didn't like my mother and therefore not her children (us) either because she wouldn't go for her N-word hateful speech and didn't want us to hear it either.

    In the case of my brother and I, we were taught not to be racist. We were a blank slate on the matter, and depending on which side of the family we believed or were most influenced by, we could have gone either way. We chose to be like my mother rather than like my father's family.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951476].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author discrat
      Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

      In the case of my brother and I, we were taught not to be racist. We were a blank slate on the matter, and depending on which side of the family we believed or were most influenced by, we could have gone either way. We chose to be like my mother rather than like my father's family.
      Suzy,
      My girl in kindergarden has a African American friend. ( two actually)

      Earlier this year my wife and I were talking about a few situations with her.

      After school she will talk about certain friends she hung out with in class. We always ask which ones is she referring to.

      When she first started talking about Marcus we asked which one was he. This happened a number of times before we knew exactly who Marcus was. When she described him she awlays would describe him as short and with a lisp. Not once did she ever say black. Not once.

      I wish I could say I take some sort of credit for it. But I can't

      She just does not see the color. She truly doesn't.

      Its weird. I do, my wife, does but she does not. And I am talking about physically seeing his color not metaphorically.

      Its just not there

      So is Racism DNA related ?

      It is entirely ENTIRELY based on socio- economic and environmental factors learned thru EXPERIENCE
      Signature

      Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951504].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
        Banned
        Originally Posted by discrat View Post

        When she first started talking about Marcus we asked which one was he. This happened a number of times before we knew exactly who Marcus was. When she described him she awlays would describe him as short and with a lisp. Not once did she ever say black. Not once.
        I was raised that way. I don't, and never have said that I have a white friend or a black friend and I don't refer to my grandchildren as my black grandchildren and my white grandchildren. My mother actually worked continually to raise us that way. Genes had nothing to do with it. We could have easily been molded differently if, for instance, we were raised by my paternal grandmother.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951520].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
    You can deny the innate ingrown influences of tribalism, racism, or 'ethnic nepotism' all you want, and you can deride over eye color and hair color and equate those to race if you want - but until you acknowledge the root of the problem, there will never be a solution.

    What in the world is wrong with saying, "people are tribal or racist by nature but they don't have to act or think that way"? It gets to the basis of the problem and offers a solution. Learn not to be. Deny your natural tendencies.

    Unless, of course, you don't really want a solution and have ulterior motives in perpetuating discrimination and racial tension.
    Signature

    The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

    Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951515].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author discrat
      Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

      What in the world is wrong with saying, "people are tribal or racist by nature but they don't have to act or think that way"? It gets to the basis of the problem and offers a solution. Learn not to be.
      Steve, whats wrong with saying the World is flat like so many argued way back when and went on and on telling others they were crazy for suggesting otherwise ?

      Because it is just NOT truth.

      It really isn't

      I know you think I am trying to be PC or put on a "Im above that ,better than though" guise.

      But I truly am not.

      I remember when I was younger I could not come to grips that there were Men who could NOT be attracted towards women.

      It wasn't until I met a few gay friends at work did I truly believe that their differing Mindset was REAL. It was not some rebellious tendency or superficial ideology they had adopted on a lark.

      One of my good friends that best explained to me and said that the same sexuality I had towards Men is exactly how he felt towards women ( that there was no attraction)

      Like I said sometimes when the wiring in our own Monds is so strong we automatically think it has to be that way for everybody.

      But honestly, it is just not.

      There is no denial or coming to grips when such things just do not exist with some people
      Signature

      Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951532].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
        Originally Posted by discrat View Post

        Steve, whats wrong with saying the World is flat like so many argued way back when and went on and on telling others they were crazy for suggesting otherwise ?

        Because it is just NOT truth.

        It really isn't

        I know you think I am trying to be PC or put on a "Im above that ,better than though" guise.

        But I truly am not.

        I remember when I was younger I could not come to grips that there were Men who could NOT be attracted towards women.

        It wasn't until I met a few gay friends at work did I truly believe that their differing Mindset was REAL. It was not some rebellious tendency or superficial ideology they had adopted on a lark.

        One of my good friends that best explained to me and said that the same sexuality I had towards Men is exactly how he felt towards women ( that there was no attraction)

        Like I said sometimes when the wiring in our own Monds is so strong we automatically think it has to be that way for everybody.

        But honestly, it is just not.

        There is no denial or coming to grips when such things just do not exist with some people
        I think you missed everything, including what I wrote, that mentioned 'tendencies'. Nowhere did I say or even imply that the tendencies are the same strength - or even exist - in everyone. There are doubtless many people in the world, Suzanne, for instance, in whom it isn't even a consideration.

        when the wiring in our own M[i]nds is so strong
        Is that not the very definition of an innate tendency?

        Steve, whats wrong with saying the World is flat like so many argued way back when and went on and on telling others they were crazy for suggesting otherwise ?

        Because it is just NOT truth.
        According to you, but not according to countless anthropologists and social scientists who have studied it. This is a case where science is not on the side of your argument, no matter how much you protest.
        Signature

        The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

        Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951587].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
          Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

          According to you, but not according to countless anthropologists and social scientists who have studied it. This is a case where science is not on the side of your argument, no matter how much you protest.
          To put it plain Steve you dont speak for science and as is often misunderstood neither do scientists. What speask for science is tests and studies. You have been presented with studies that contradict your premise. Again when studies conflict SCIENCE isn't saying one side is right

          essentially you are engaged in two fallacious bits of reasoning

          begging the question
          and appealing to authority

          simply saying scientists agree with you and not addressing studies that discredit your claims makes no solid point "no matter how much your protest".
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951621].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

      You can deny the innate ingrown influences of tribalism, racism, or 'ethnic nepotism' all you want, and you can deride over eye color and hair color and equate those to race if you want
      Its about the science not the want. No one has to be in denial of anything when the science isn't where you say it is. Conflicting studies do not make for a scientific fact. simple. That is NOT how science is done.

      What in the world is wrong with saying, "people are tribal or racist by nature but they don't have to act or think that way"? .
      Easy and elementary.

      A) its not been scientifically proven
      B) its an out - a potential excuse for erroneous behavior. genes made me do it takes away from the immoral gravity of it. Its like the alleged male cheating gene which every woman should give a face palm to.

      Unless, of course, you don't really want a solution and have ulterior motives in perpetuating discrimination and racial tension.
      Uh huh.......alrighty then four .Makes sense - since you don't have the proven science you claim to have anyone that doesn't buy what you say has an ulterior motive.

      Or is it that you have an ulterior motive to claim its a proven science fact? Inquiring minds wish to know.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951549].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author discrat
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post


        Or is it that you have an ulterior motive to claim its a proven science fact? Inquiring minds wish to know.
        Could be.

        What could similarly be said maybe it is someone twisting and bending the Facts to conveniently accommodate their own personal discriminatory and racist agendas and views ?
        Signature

        Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951584].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
          Originally Posted by discrat View Post

          Could be.

          What could similarly be said maybe it is someone twisting and bending the Facts to conveniently accommodate their own personal discriminatory and racist agendas and views ?
          What 'agenda' might I have?

          How in the hell can you even insinuate that my views are racist or discriminatory? That's just offensive and totally untrue.

          EFF you, as you like to say.
          Signature

          The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

          Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951618].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    You can thank Gov. for keeping the race card played.

    The last offline job I had a few years ago was with an international business. The business was required by Gov to have a certain percentage of Asian & Blacks in order to get a Gov contract. Employee skill qualifications wasn't a priority so what the German company did was met the race quota & put those people on unnecessary menial jobs.

    Next, stroll on over to the SBA Gov. website & have a look at the advantages so called minorities have, it's BS to give anyone a tax break based on race yet it's still happening in 2015.

    It's hilarious to see people bitch about race yet they'll sign up for something like SBA related that gives them an advantage based on race.

    It's not just race, it's also gender. SBA promotes women having advantages for starting a business. You won't see SBA telling men they'll have an advantage If they start a business, not going to happen.

    Things like Gov. stepping in on the Missouri problem is a smoke screen & defiantly hypocritical of Gov considering they promote segregation (examples above).

    So..., once again, thank Gov for keeping the race/gender pot stirred.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951528].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      It's not just race, it's also gender. SBA promotes women having advantages for starting a business. You won't see SBA telling men they'll have an advantage If they start a business, not going to happen.
      Nor should it since they already have an advantage. Thats the point. A group that has had an unfair disadvantage is being given a period of time where an advantage is being given to help even things out. Since no one can specify all of the women that were specifically affected it acts like a kind of general group settlement. I don't know that its always effective and I don't always agree with it but its not BS.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951591].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

        Nor should it since they already have an advantage. Thats the point. A group that has had an unfair disadvantage is being given a period of time where an advantage is being given to help even things out. Since no one can specify all of the women that were specifically affected it acts like a kind of general group settlement. I don't know that its always effective and I don't always agree with it but its not BS.
        It's complete BS, nothing less.

        In order to stop a race issue it has to first stop being promoted as an advantage.

        Nobody in 2015 brought slaves to the New World. It might be time to move on.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951609].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
          Originally Posted by yukon View Post

          It' complete BS, nothing less.

          In order to stop a race issue it has to first stop being promoted as an advantage.
          that can work only when it nowhere in society is still a disadvantage. of course thats the new racist gambit some play. Claim whoever mention that it still might be around is pulling a "card" and should shut up. Mind you there are people who pull it to pull it but there are some who claim any mention of it is pulling (for their own agenda).

          Nobody in 2015 brought slaves to the New World. It might be time to move on.
          actually you need to read what you write. Knowing how impartial you are on the matter of racism I was referring to the women you mentioned. No women in 2015 were ever discriminated against in 2015? do tell?

          and umm slavery was not the end all and be all of racism against blacks in America. There are people still alive in 2015 who had to go to the back of the bus to ride on it. You might want to catch up on some light reading.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951642].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author yukon
            Banned
            Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

            actually you need to read what you write. Knowing how impartial you are on the matter of racism I was referring to the women you mentioned. No women in 2015 were ever discriminated against in 2015? do tell?

            and umm slavery was not the end all and be all of racism against blacks in America. There are people still alive in 2015 who had to go to the back of the bus to ride on it. You might want to catch up on some light reading.
            I'm up to date, I see Gov/SBA promoting gender segregation in 2015.

            Lol, at the bus in 2015, share the story. Was it on The Onion?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951653].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      You can thank Gov. for keeping the race card played.

      The last offline job I had a few years ago was with an international business. The business was required by Gov to have a certain percentage of Asian & Blacks in order to get a Gov contract. Employee skill qualifications wasn't a priority so what the German company did was met the race quota & put those people on unnecessary menial jobs.

      Next, stroll on over to the SBA Gov. website & have a look at the advantages so called minorities have, it's BS to give anyone a tax break based on race yet it's still happening in 2015.

      It's hilarious to see people bitch about race yet they'll sign up for something like SBA related that gives them an advantage based on race.

      It's not just race, it's also gender. SBA promotes women having advantages for starting a business. You won't see SBA telling men they'll have an advantage If they start a business, not going to happen.

      Things like Gov. stepping in on the Missouri problem is a smoke screen & defiantly hypocritical of Gov considering they promote segregation (examples above).

      So..., once again, thank Gov for keeping the race/gender pot stirred.
      First of all, those gov contracts are with PUBLIC taxpayer money and we all have a right to some of it.

      Given the history of this nation I think its only fair that something needs to insure that all of the PUBLIC get a chance at some of that PUBLIC money and if it means quotas etc. then so be it.

      You can call it what you want - I call it greed. Some folks were/are already getting 99% of the PUBLIC contracts, jobs etc, but some people want all 100% of it.

      Bitch and moan about unqualified people etc., but we both know that in the history of this country, plenty of qualified people didn't even get considered for jobs - let alone contracts - and once again...

      ... that's taxpayer/PUBLIC money - not private money.


      About the feds stepping in, in places and situations like Furgerson etc,...


      ... IMHO it is one of the fed governments job to make sure all the folks of this country are treated fairly if not equally by local authorities.

      If that recent DOJ report is any where near truthful, that town was run like a colony and the black citizens were treated like colonists only to be exploited.
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952700].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Midnight Oil
        Race Together?


        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952730].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

        First of all, those gov contracts are with PUBLIC taxpayer money and we all have a right to some of it.
        WRONG! It is public TAXPAYER money!

        Given the history of this nation I think its only fair that something needs to insure that all of the PUBLIC get a chance at some of that PUBLIC money and if it means quotas etc. then so be it.
        WRONG, read the constitution!

        You can call it what you want - I call it greed. Some folks are already getting 90% of the PUBLIC contracts, jobs etc, but want all 100% of it.
        Contracts are SUPPOSED to be awarded based on merit and price! If that isn't happening, FIX THAT! But I guess you are saying blacks don't have enough merit!

        Bitch and moan about unqualified people etc., but we both know that in the history of this country, plenty of qualified people didn't even get considered for jobs - let alone contracts - and once again...
        I don't know if you even know how this works. Some companies get, and others must ask for(After all, they can't send them to EVERY company) an RFP(Request For Proposal). If the government doesn't get one, they CAN'T do business with you on this scale. It IS the LAW! The government is THEN supposed to narrw the field by picking first the compliant ones, then the ones with merit, and THEN price! If they THEN have multiple ones, they have to tighten criteria, or have some other means. As for those companies, ones that haven't complied with diversity laws, etc... are generally excluded in the FIRST pass, as that is one of the criteria! So this means that non whites ARE going to get work! The owner SHOULD NOT MATTER!

        BTW the last 3 RFPs one employer I had got had a document saying that companies owned over 50% by white males COULD NOT GET THE CONTRACT! Some companies have dealt with minority owned companies ONLY to get a chance at such contracts!

        ... that's taxpayer/PUBLIC money - not private money.
        AGAIN! TAXPAYER, so PRIVATE! PUBLIC means the US, in this case!

        About stepping in, in places and situations like Furgerson etc,...


        ... IMHO it is the fed govs job to make sure all the folks of this country are treated equally by local authorities.
        FUNNY, they haven't done things like this before for OTHER races! The idea of schools being separated, etc... was a different story ENTIRELY, because the case was WARRANTED!

        If that recent DOJ report is any where near truthful, that town was run like a colony and the black citizens were treated like colonists to be exploited.
        But YOU WANT this country to be treated like that! You even say that HERE! As for the DOJ report, it was wishywashy. It basically said that this case was as the grand jury decided, but they STILL want their agenda promoted!

        Even when they speak of problems they supposedly found, they generally speak about "Focus on Generating Revenue". That very PHRASE speaks VOLUME! It basically says:

        "Because we have created so much inflation, and diverted so many funds, they find themselves lacking funds, and feel they must do these underhanded things, like raising taxes, and being less tolerant, to get money threw taxes, fees, and other things such as speeding tickets."

        FOCUS obviously means they CONCENTRATE ON! "Generating Revenue" is government speak for TAX and CHARGE FEES/FINES! And that ALWAYS leads to inflation.

        As for blacks being stopped almost 50% more often, you REALLY don't think that is possibly because of how they drive etc? HEY, when I was a teenager, I was DENIED a car because of what I call SEXISM! They were going to charge me a HEFTY premium simply because I was a BOY! The government and insurance companies CLAIM it isn't sexism because they have SEX as a metric, and MALES, especially YOUNG males, tend to be in more accidents! And what of the riots they had there recently? What race were almost all of THOSE people? If you want to be treated equally, GREAT! If you do twice as much wrong, your chances should be twice as high of getting caught!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952898].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

          WRONG! It is public TAXPAYER money!



          WRONG, read the constitution!



          Contracts are SUPPOSED to be awarded based on merit and price! If that isn't happening, FIX THAT! But I guess you are saying blacks don't have enough merit!



          I don't know if you even know how this works. Some companies get, and others must ask for(After all, they can't send them to EVERY company) an RFP(Request For Proposal). If the government doesn't get one, they CAN'T do business with you on this scale. It IS the LAW! The government is THEN supposed to narrw the field by picking first the compliant ones, then the ones with merit, and THEN price! If they THEN have multiple ones, they have to tighten criteria, or have some other means. As for those companies, ones that haven't complied with diversity laws, etc... are generally excluded in the FIRST pass, as that is one of the criteria! So this means that non whites ARE going to get work! The owner SHOULD NOT MATTER!

          BTW the last 3 RFPs one employer I had got had a document saying that companies owned over 50% by white males COULD NOT GET THE CONTRACT! Some companies have dealt with minority owned companies ONLY to get a chance at such contracts!



          AGAIN! TAXPAYER, so PRIVATE! PUBLIC means the US, in this case!



          FUNNY, they haven't done things like this before for OTHER races! The idea of schools being separated, etc... was a different story ENTIRELY, because the case was WARRANTED!



          But YOU WANT this country to be treated like that! You even say that HERE! As for the DOJ report, it was wishywashy. It basically said that this case was as the grand jury decided, but they STILL want their agenda promoted!

          Even when they speak of problems they supposedly found, they generally speak about "Focus on Generating Revenue". That very PHRASE speaks VOLUME! It basically says:

          "Because we have created so much inflation, and diverted so many funds, they find themselves lacking funds, and feel they must do these underhanded things, like raising taxes, and being less tolerant, to get money threw taxes, fees, and other things such as speeding tickets."

          FOCUS obviously means they CONCENTRATE ON! "Generating Revenue" is government speak for TAX and CHARGE FEES/FINES! And that ALWAYS leads to inflation.

          As for blacks being stopped almost 50% more often, you REALLY don't think that is possibly because of how they drive etc? HEY, when I was a teenager, I was DENIED a car because of what I call SEXISM! They were going to charge me a HEFTY premium simply because I was a BOY! The government and insurance companies CLAIM it isn't sexism because they have SEX as a metric, and MALES, especially YOUNG males, tend to be in more accidents! And what of the riots they had there recently? What race were almost all of THOSE people? If you want to be treated equally, GREAT! If you do twice as much wrong, your chances should be twice as high of getting caught!

          Steve
          More non productive, wandering blather...

          You're the wanderer and the blatherer ...


          This should be your theme song - The Blatherer!
          Signature

          "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952957].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Neil deGrasse Tyson has a video on Youtube where he said it best, he nailed it by saying this world holds itself back because of ignorant issues like race. So many things don't come into existence because people are flawed in their thinking, things like war are completely unnecessary. As an example war mostly circles around only a few things, race, religion, property.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951628].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Neil deGrasse Tyson has a video on Youtube where he said it best, he nailed it by saying this world holds itself back because of ignorant issues like race. .
      LOl...don't even try implying Neil Tyson supports your views on race Yuke. Thats just too funny
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951675].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    It's kinda funny, this thread was started to rip on Starbucks for mentioning race but we're here talking about race which was Starbucks goal.

    Mission accomplished.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951640].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      It's kinda funny, this thread was started to rip on Starbucks for mentioning race but we're here talking about race which was Starbucks goal.

      Mission accomplished.
      A conversation which I also said I was not interested in having, because they always turn out just like this one has. Sheesh.

      Done. LOL
      Signature

      The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

      Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951649].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

        A conversation which I also said I was not interested in having, because they always turn out just like this one has. Sheesh.

        Done. LOL
        Agreed...

        I'm out of here, I have work to do.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951671].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    With regard to TEACHING pro or con racism, etc... BEWARE!!!!!!!!!!!! KIDS NOTICE! They might never mention it, because, by a certain age, they realize it may elicit anger, etc... But they may RESENT IT, etc.....

    If you head up a choir, and turn down people for signing poorly, and let some bad singers in that appear to have carte blanche, PEOPLE NOTICE!
    If you are a coach, and turn down people for being bad players, and let bad player in that appear to have carte blanche, PEOPLE NOTICE!
    If you are a teacher, and give people an F for getting only 70% right, and another gets a B for getting 70% right , and they appear to have carte blanche, PEOPLE NOTICE!
    If you seem nasty to nearly everyone, but are friendly towards some others, that appear to have carte blanche, PEOPLE NOTICE!

    PEOPLE NOTICE! If the differences are due to sex, race, etc... it doesn't help the anti-racism message.

    You know, Disney recently came out with a nice DCOM. I think everyone should watch it. It is called "Cloud Nine". The protagonist is a girl, and she has TWO conspiracies hit her HARD! ONE was that her fathers clout has KNOWLINGLY been used by him to make her look like the best skier on the circuit. EVERYONE knows, but HER! THAT triggers a SECONDARY conspiracy to GET RID OF HER, and DISGRACE HER. When she confronts her father about this, and finds out he knew, she says:

    "WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL ME I WASN'T THE BEST? I WOULD HAVE TRIED *****HARDER*****!"

    Being a movie and all, she ends up nearly dying, by trying harder, and risks severe bodily injury, but she creates her OWN TEAM, perfects a very complicated performance, and leads her new team to victory, and gets everyone to stop laughing at her. Everyone that earlier belittled her, except the leader of the other team that conspired to frame her, ends up apologizing.

    But YEAH, you see this SAME kind of problem in those talent shows! HECK, if everyone were perfect with math, or there were no calculators, people would do better math! SOME achievements are done SIMPLY to live up to expectations!

    People made fun of Einstein for doing poorly in French. HE answered that HIMSELF! He LATER did FINE in French when he had a USE for it.

    His WORST subject, BY FAR, was FRENCH! But He did NOT need to know french! He was a good student otherwise.

    Albert Einstein

    When he became famous, and traveled to French speaking parts, they were shocked he spoke so well:

    How good was Einstein's English? What other languages did he know besides German? - Quora

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951759].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      You know, Disney recently came out with a nice DCOM. I think everyone should watch it. It is called "Cloud Nine". The protagonist is a girl, and she has TWO conspiracies hit her HARD! ONE was that her fathers clout has KNOWLINGLY been used by him to make her look like the best skier on the circuit. EVERYONE knows, but HER! THAT triggers a SECONDARY conspiracy to GET RID OF HER, and DISGRACE HER.

      Good night. I have been meaning to ask for awhile now -

      What in the world is Seasoned seasoned with??
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9951903].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author More Than Tips
    How dare Star Bucks try to force me to discuss Race! I am going to my favorite MARKETING forum right now and start a discussion on Race dammit!

    Starbucks#Winning
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9952142].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

    You don't get to make demands of me - you can read your own words. It doesn't help solve any problem when the go to is always anger and racism. It never will and that's sad.

    I say...


    OK, I respectfully request that you simply and easily copy and paste what I have written in this thread that has called someone in here a racist.


    If you can't or won't that would also be very sad for YOU because you would have failed to back up a major charge you have chosen to lob at me.
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953103].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author socialentry
      Banned
      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

      If you can't or won't that would also be very sad for YOU because you would have failed to back up a major charge you have chosen to lob at me.
      She's been doing that a lot lately.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955122].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author More Than Tips
    Wow one of the worse threads I have ever read on the warrior forum ever. I thought if I stayed away from Yahoo Comments I could avoid it...apparently not. Let's just have a section called Fox News.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953857].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by More Than Tips View Post

      Wow one of the worse threads I have ever read on the warrior forum ever. I thought if I stayed away from Yahoo Comments I could avoid it...apparently not. Let's just have a section called Fox News.
      This was a thread about a STUPID idea from starbucks. How do you arrive at fox news? HECK, FOX NEWS isn't in the business of talking about racism, etc... And HEY! Conservatives help you guys to maybe be more fair! HERE is a good example! It is funny and informative, I PROMISE!


      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9953989].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
      Originally Posted by More Than Tips View Post

      Wow one of the worse threads I have ever read on the warrior forum ever.

      You obviously haven't been around these parts long.
      Signature

      Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9954042].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    TIM! NAME IT! NAME the white privilege! State here the address, phone number or SOMETHING! I mean if they are SOOOO powerful, THEY WON'T CARE! If they DO, PM me! I would LOVE to see it!

    TL saying I am inflammatory! WOW! Back to the message, somewhat:


    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955180].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      Well, good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.

      I thought I'd take a few minutes and respond to a couple of posts.

      As a reminder, Mike Anthony is on my Ignore List, so I do not see any posts that he makes.

      Here we go...


      Joe Mobley
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955196].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author discrat
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      TIM! NAME IT! NAME the white privilege! State here the address, phone number or SOMETHING! I mean if they are SOOOO powerful, THEY WON'T CARE! If they DO, PM me! I would LOVE to see it!

      TL saying I am inflammatory! WOW! Back to the message, somewhat:

      Black Conservative Rips Starbucks a New One! || Louder With Crowder - YouTube

      Steve

      The Conservative African American...Always Steve's Ace in the Hole
      Signature

      Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955218].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      TIM! NAME IT! NAME the white privilege!
      Name it? It has a name already. It's called white privilege. :/

      Here's some help for you:

      "The term denotes both obvious and less obvious passive advantages that white persons may not recognize they have, which distinguishes it from overt bias or prejudice."
      White privilege - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955312].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

        Name it? It has a name already. It's called white privilege. :/
        WOW! SO UNICORNS exist, because they have a NAME!?

        Here's some help for you:

        "The term denotes both obvious and less obvious passive advantages that white persons may not recognize they have, which distinguishes it from overt bias or prejudice."
        Leprechaun - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        GO AHEAD, DESCRIBE IT! YEAH, I knew after I said it I should have used another word, or should have written a paragraph to explain it, but I thought NAW, HE WON'T TRY THAT!

        GEE, I have heard an INCREDIBLE number of stupid stories. And if you count MYTHS? WOW! You know, the british had something like leprechauns. They called them Gremlins. The DANISH do ALSO! THEY call them nisse! But I won't hide the cats and go to the barn with a treat, or look all over whatever for some creature waiting to cause me grief, or chase around looking for a guy to grant my most fantastic wish.

        Now if YOU want to do that, GREAT! Go now! I think they like jumping off cliffs too. MAYBE you can find one on the way down! But I haven't seen any evidence of this. HEY, if I am supposed to have some sort of card or so, I WANT TO KNOW! YOU claimed I should!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955329].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author socialentry
    Banned
    Someone should put this thread out of its misery.

    The topic of race relations in America rivals basket weaving and polka dancing in terms of boring-ness.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955197].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
    Wow... this went from being a (mostly) meaningful conversation to...well, less of a meaningful conversation.

    (Sigh)

    Oh well. I don't know why I thought today would be any different.
    Signature

    Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955337].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

      Wow... this went from being a (mostly) meaningful conversation to...well, less of a meaningful conversation.

      (Sigh)

      Oh well. I don't know why I thought today would be any different.
      To put some meaning back into it. I've still never been in a Starbucks or had a Starbucks coffee
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955372].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author discrat
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        To put some meaning back into it. I've still never been in a Starbucks or had a Starbucks coffee
        Thom,
        Then you must be a Racist

        Thats just something I am 'pulling out of my a$$' today similar to what some have done in this Thread by accusing others as 'racist'
        Signature

        Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955381].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          Originally Posted by discrat View Post

          Thom,
          Then you must be a Racist

          Thats just something I am 'pulling out of my a$$' today similar to what some have done in this Thread by accusing others as 'racist'
          I've been called worse
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955388].message }}
          • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955431].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author discrat
              [QUOTE=Joe Mobley;9955431]

              Joe a lot of this stuff I agree with. I think 'victomhood' is a huge business for a number of people.

              People make huge livings off ' victimhood '

              Also 'identity politics' is a scary notion. College Educated women voting for Barack Obama based on the one fact that he would push govt subsidized contraceptives. I voted for him but for several reasons

              But here is the thing that bothers me. The young woman, the second one speaking was talking about how women are strong and that they do not need to play the victim had me going until she said..."women standing around and staying married to people like Bill Clinton who does these horrible things to you and embarrasses you etc "

              its like whoa where did that come from ?

              And why ? Why does she have to get into attacking and bi-partisan politics and throw this in the there?

              She is so much more intelligent than that ( at least she seems to be)

              Yes, I agree with her I think Militant feminizing is a very narrow way to view and act in the World around you. It limits an individual so much

              But then why go into the personal attack mode.

              Its just a huge turnoff for me. And takes away her credibility. Don't these people see this ?

              Thats why I can't stand hardcore Conservatives and hardcore liberals.
              They can both kiss my a$$

              And I have beliefs that might fall under both

              But they are too emotional and extremely biased towards concepts which are unfortunately hardwired into their Minds without little to any wiggle room

              People need to have wiggle room and start thinking for themselves and not let their emotions think for them
              Signature

              Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955453].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
      Steve, there are plenty of examples of what white privilege is. Recent ones also. You and I are less likely to be pulled over while driving, less likely to be arrested once pulled over, less likely to be convicted, more likely to get a shorter sentence if we are convicted of a crime, more likely go get a job interview and a job, more likely to be approved for a loan, more likely to receive a substantial inheritance, more likely to attend better equipped and financed schools...

      We can still be hard workers and earn what we have but that doesn't mean there isn't an advantage we have over others. It's a pretty simple concept really.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955376].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author discrat
        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

        Steve, there are plenty of examples of what white privilege is. Recent ones also. You and I are less likely to be pulled over while driving, less likely to be arrested once pulled over, less likely to be convicted, more likely to get a shorter sentence if we are convicted of a crime, more likely go get a job interview and a job, more likely to be approved for a loan, more likely to receive a substantial inheritance, more likely to attend better equipped and financed schools...

        We can still be hard workers and earn what we have but that doesn't mean there isn't an advantage we have over others. It's a pretty simple concept really.
        I rememebr I was working at Gannet Publishing back in 2002. A lot of my co workers were black.

        I remember they were talking about being pulled over by Police. I being so knowledgeable said that blacks do not get pulled over any worse than white people

        They didn't say anything and just laughed and roll their eyes.

        I found out for the next couple of years why they were so sarcastic. Because a number of them got continually pulled over by Police for no apparent reason.

        My point is just because YOU do not think it is exist doesnt mean it doesnt exist
        Signature

        Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955429].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          Originally Posted by discrat View Post

          I rememebr I was working at Gannet Publishing back in 2002. A lot of my co workers were black.

          I remember they were talking about being pulled over by Police. I being so knowledgeable said that blacks do not get pulled over any worse than white people

          They didn't say anything and just laughed and roll their eyes.

          I found out for the next couple of years why they were so sarcastic. Because a number of them got continually pulled over by Police for no apparent reason.

          My point is just because YOU do not think it is exist doesnt mean it doesnt exist
          Back in the late 60's and early 70's when I rode my motorcycle it was guaranteed I'd get pulled over. The usual routine was for the cop to get behind his door with his revolver pointed at me while I had to get off my bike with my hands raised and walk backwards to his voice. I always got searched and if I complained I usually got roughed up. I must add that was with town police and sheriffs, the State police always treated me with respect as long as I treated them the same way.
          As for blacks getting pulled over more then whites, yes it happened then and it still happens now. Strangely the color of the cop doesn't seem to matter. One of my first girlfriends was a black girl. Myself her and her brother where always together. Out in public we got shit from both whites and blacks. The relationship lasted until her father found out and made her go live with relatives, he simply wasn't having his daughter dating a white boy.
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955532].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

            Back in the late 60's and early 70's when I rode my motorcycle it was guaranteed I'd get pulled over. The usual routine was for the cop to get behind his door with his revolver pointed at me while I had to get off my bike with my hands raised and walk backwards to his voice. I always got searched and if I complained I usually got roughed up. I must add that was with town police and sheriffs, the State police always treated me with respect as long as I treated them the same way.
            As for blacks getting pulled over more then whites, yes it happened then and it still happens now. Strangely the color of the cop doesn't seem to matter. One of my first girlfriends was a black girl. Myself her and her brother where always together. Out in public we got shit from both whites and blacks. The relationship lasted until her father found out and made her go live with relatives, he simply wasn't having his daughter dating a white boy.
            So you are white, and you STILL got harassed! YEP, that is what happens when you ride vehicles that have a "BAD GUY" image. I'm saying NOTHING against bikes, bikers, or you, but bikes got a bad guy image, so bikers did ALSO.

            I once took a girl to see one of her girlfriends, and we were asked to leave because we might get shot. Being white, in a poor high crime area that is almost 100% suspicious blacks, is not a good idea.

            Steve
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955636].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author ThomM
              Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

              So you are white, and you STILL got harassed! YEP, that is what happens when you ride vehicles that have a "BAD GUY" image. I'm saying NOTHING against bikes, bikers, or you, but bikes got a bad guy image, so bikers did ALSO.

              I once took a girl to see one of her girlfriends, and we were asked to leave because we might get shot. Being white, in a poor high crime area that is almost 100% suspicious blacks, is not a good idea.

              Steve
              Here's the difference Steve. All I had to do was cut my hair, shave and ride a different type of motorcycle to end the profiling and harassment.
              Signature

              Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
              Getting old ain't for sissy's
              As you are I was, as I am you will be
              You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955661].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

                Here's the difference Steve. All I had to do was cut my hair, shave and ride a different type of motorcycle to end the profiling and harassment.
                I wasn't equating the two in that way AT ALL!

                *******HOWEVER********

                YEP, you can cut your hair, shave, and ride a different type of vehicle. SO WHAT? TRAYVON could have done the same, worn tighter clothes, and walked on the sidewalk.

                OK, OK, BROWN couldn't have done just that, but he could have covered his looks in some way.

                STILL, in ALL those cases, the PERSON is the same! YOU are, maybe claiming you were a nice guy, etc... OK, on the motorcycle you were, but you can LOOK the part. Admittedly, it isn't a great system.

                If there is a place, like I described in south central, police WILL be on their guard because they KNOW a lot are BAD!

                That "teacher" in that "school" was out of place! The neighbors called the police, and he IGNORED and INSULTED the police. So OF COURSE they "harassed" him. He COULD have simply provided his license, they would say "SORRY SIR", and LEAVE! But he LITERALLY made a FEDERAL case out of it! I means when the US AG and the POTUS get involved, you just CAN'T get much more federal!

                Would he prefer that the police not bother investigating odd occurrences at his home?

                Steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955723].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                  Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                  I wasn't equating the two in that way AT ALL!

                  *******HOWEVER********

                  YEP, you can cut your hair, shave, and ride a different type of vehicle. SO WHAT? TRAYVON could have done the same, worn tighter clothes, and walked on the sidewalk.
                  ROFL...even among those who think race had nothing to do with it this is the first I have heard tight clothes would have saved Trayvon Martin. You are going for the record in silly comments per thread.

                  but he could have covered his looks in some way."
                  Sure.....


                  Race Makeup by Clairol

                  "Whens you got to be White"
                  Signature

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955751].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                    Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                    ROFL...You are going for the record in silly comments per thread.

                    Sure.....

                    No kidding. The funny thing is he really seems to believe he is making good points. Lol smh
                    Signature
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955775].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                      Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                      No kidding. The funny thing is he really seems to believe he is making good points. Lol smh
                      I said tighter, and walked on the sidewalk! YEP, good points! It looked like he was packing, and casing places! If a WHITE did that, they would be stopped ALSO!

                      And "Race Makeup by Clairol" is a good point?

                      I wish I could remember the specifics, but one person escaped from a prison, and spoke with a police officer a while, within like an hour of the escape, which the police were aware of. The police officer said he had suspicions, but he never acted on them. SURE, he was white, but he didn't have to put on black face to obscure who he was.

                      Steve
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955879].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                        I said tighter, and walked on the sidewalk! YEP, good points! It looked like he was packing, and casing places! If a WHITE did that, they would be stopped ALSO!

                        And "Race Makeup by Clairol" is a good point?

                        I wish I could remember the specifics, but one person escaped from a prison, and spoke with a police officer a while, within like an hour of the escape, which the police were aware of. The police officer said he had suspicions, but he never acted on them. SURE, he was white, but he didn't have to put on black face to obscure who he was.

                        Steve
                        Sad. Smh. You are actually a great example of what I was referring to earlier, if you are actually the person you say you are here. Lol

                        I can see why you stay anonymous here.
                        Signature
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955937].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                        I said tighter, and walked on the sidewalk! YEP, good points! It looked like he was packing, and casing places! If a WHITE did that, they would be stopped ALSO!
                        That you are a regular poster in the OT section with thanks says a whole lot about this place. The only person who said he was casing places was the guy who shot him (and later went on to have altercations with others). Living in the orlando area which was near the shooting I can't remember once anyone talking about him looking like he was packing because he was wearing a hoodie. You pulled that out your.....

                        Still the one great sign of progress is your type has been reduced to hanging out in a few sad corners of the internet where you are allowed to spurt your borderline and many times over the line racism. You've been marginalized even on the net most places and the world you wish for is shrinking faster and faster as your frustration grows.

                        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post


                        I can see why you stay anonymous here.
                        and theres a pretty good chance even at rallies he's umm...anonymous.
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956047].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Still the one great sign of progress is your type has been reduced to hanging out in a few sad corners of the internet where you are allowed to spurt your borderline and many times over the line racism. You've been marginalized even on the net most places and the world you wish for is shrinking faster and faster as your frustration grows.
                          I don't go to "rallies", not that you would believe me about that. You can bet that TIM and TL do!

                          I don't hang out in "a few sad corners", and am not as you imply. As for racism, etc? You want THAT? You needn't look any farther than youtube, a lot of music, movies, etc.... HECK, look at NOI or that BLT church YKW went to! And make fun if you want, but I see your side is getting more frustrated ALSO, with the riots, "occupy", etc.... And you can't figure out that such things are PART OF THE PROBLEM! You are like guys in a boat drilling holes in the bottom to let the water out before the boat sinks!

                          HECK, people complain about transparency, your side PROMISES transparency, and then they audit people to harass, get rid of backups, have private email servers, and then declare THEY are exempt from FOIA!

                          As for the grass bit, evidence backs it up, and I seem to recall some witness corroboration there.

                          As for being anonymous? I certainly didn't intend that from the beginning. If I had, I would have been more so. After all the skewing, etc... It IS obviously a good idea though. You know what they say about the internet. Of course, it is true of other venues too. Even LONG out of print books have been a source of contention for some.

                          Steve
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956542].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                            I don't hang out in "a few sad corners", and am not as you imply. As for racism, etc? You want THAT? You needn't look any farther than youtube, a lot of music, movies, etc....
                            Thats your swan song for being a racist...others are so it makes mine Okay


                            And make fun if you want, but I see your side is getting more frustrated ALSO, with the riots, "occupy", etc.... And you can't figure out that such things are PART OF THE PROBLEM! You are like guys in a boat drilling holes in the bottom to let the water out before the boat sinks!
                            lol...heres what must drive you crazy. In much of the occupying there were those from your side standing right along my side. In fact in some shots you had more of your ahem "side" than mine. However you just tell yourself what you just did to make yourself feel better because most of the time and through 90% of the US there are no riots or occupying.

                            Let there be no misunderstanding despite me pointing out racism down here (and there are only a few white sheet types even here ) I admit freely - MILLIONS of whites live in a post racial country and if there were not a few hangers on like yourself we really could stop talking about color and race altogether . They only have to deal with racism because yahoos like yourself self identify with them based on skin color. You embarrass them and you can't even say what you really want to say about Blacks anymore because THEY are the ones likely to give you the facepalm.

                            So to tell you what you already know - You lost. Marches and people standing against racism is just mop up mode - cleaning out just a few of you left that have some influence in equally small pockets. People get upset that there are actually still some of you left - like a few oily smudges left on otherwise shiny coffee table - not because they see you as any true representation of the whole or even a significant part of it. Your failure was sealed with a thud when you couldn't even keep my side from taking up residence in the White House. That didn't mean as some thought all racism was dead but that those who really do live in a post racial country are more than those who cling to the past to validate themselves on the pathetic basis of an inherited skin color gene.

                            Stream posts with Caps on a forum. Its all for nothing. Your views are never going to be in fashion ever again.
                            Signature

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956677].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                        Banned
                        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

                        I said tighter, and walked on the sidewalk! YEP, good points! It looked like he was packing, and casing places! If a WHITE did that, they would be stopped ALSO!

                        What a crock. A boy who had become paranoid about an armed asshole following him could have just worn tighter clothes and walked on the sidewalk and everything would have been hunky dorry. You are certainly delusional. He was packing ... skittles and a soda. And Zimmerman was not law enforcement. He was just a racist asshole.

                        By the way Steve ... fashion isn't a crime. You can wear hoodies or loose clothing in this country if you want to.
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956281].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                          What a crock. A boy who had become paranoid about an armed asshole following him could have just worn tighter clothes and walked on the sidewalk and everything would have been hunky dorry. You are certainly delusional. He was packing ... skittles and a soda.

                          And Zimmerman was not law enforcement. He was just a racist asshole.

                          By the way Steve ... fashion isn't a crime. You can wear hoodies or loose clothing in this country if you want to.
                          It must be noted...

                          Being super dense and thinking that what Zimmerman did was OK is bad enough, ...

                          ... but Mr. Seasoned had to be one of the very few people in here who also went out of their way to trash the victim - in an attempt to further justify the killing - as if he was commissioned with a mission.
                          Signature

                          "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956583].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                            Banned
                            Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                            It must be noted...

                            Being super dense and thinking that what Zimmerman did was OK is bad enough, ...

                            ... but Mr. Seasoned had to be one of the very few people in here who also went out of their way to trash the victim - in an attempt to further justify the killing - as if he was commissioned with a mission.
                            I know that and he's still trying to do it by implying that the clothes he wore was wrong, it was wrong to have a soda and skittles in his hands or pockets, it was wrong to try to evade George by going on the grass when he was stalking him with a loaded gun.

                            It's par for the course with Steve.
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956591].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

        Steve, there are plenty of examples of what white privilege is. Recent ones also. You and I are less likely to be pulled over while driving, less likely to be arrested once pulled over, less likely to be convicted, more likely to get a shorter sentence if we are convicted of a crime, more likely go get a job interview and a job, more likely to be approved for a loan, more likely to receive a substantial inheritance, more likely to attend better equipped and financed schools...

        We can still be hard workers and earn what we have but that doesn't mean there isn't an advantage we have over others. It's a pretty simple concept really.
        REALLY? Cars MAGICALLY appear if you are black? I have probably been pulled over about 20-30% of the time I saw a cop in the area. ONCE, the guy almost SHOT me! ANOTHER time, had I matched the expected culture, I would have been ARRESTED! ONE guy threatened to arrest me, and tow my car, because someone ELSE hit me! I got maybe 3 tickets! Of course, SOME cops hide, so if they magically appear, maybe you just didn't see them! BTW I HAVE been in cars with non whites, and some were driven by non whites, and I NEVER saw the vehicle get pulled over. I have ALSO been in a caravan of sorts a few times, with non whites, and NONE have gotten pulled over!

        As for convicted? I fought one ticket, and LOST! A guard claimed that I stole a book, and I went to discuss it with others, and at least was exonerated from that. I showed him the book AS I ENTERED, and was APPALLED at that! As for a shorter sentence, I have never committed a crime, so....

        There were a couple interviews I didn't get, and may have been DOZENS I never even was CONSIDERED for. I never lied there, and was pretty qualified, so.... BTW A friend of mine was not hired SPECIFICALLY because he was white and male! The interviewer TOLD ME SO! So I am not assuming here! A dark skinned woman got the job. GEE, they lowered my loans, etc... after the new idiotic credit laws! What does inheritance have to do with ANYTHING? My family historically has done pretty well, though they HAVE been here for over 100 years. They bought a lot of land that now is a resort They don't own most of that land now. I DO have a cousin that got a house on the resort for her marriage(as I recall that was the occasion), but I haven't even seen them for a long time. My father had a lot of nice land there, but let his brother in law sell it for a song to a company! So what did I get? SO FAR, only $500. Is that a lot? BTW that $500 is 500 US dollars! 1 THOUSANDTH of HALF a million!

        More likely? Have you looked at the stats LATELY!?!?!!? BTW there is a nice college that has a dormitory and a scholarship founded by a family member of mine. But YEAH, I still have to pay for my mortgage.

        All you said is so much dreck. It makes loads of assumptions, ignores current stats and laws, and generalizes.

        I had a friend that seems like, and acts like, a BUM. He travels all over on funds he gets from churches, and delivers pizza "for a living". Oh well, he lives in what is essentially a PENTHOUSE with his father. I say essentially, because I don't think it is quite on the top floor, but it is the entire floor, and has a huge ariel view of the wilshire area. Is he white? Well, yes and no! His skin is white, and that is all I will say. He and I would answer the census differently. His father was a big commercial developer. It would be interesting to see if he gets anything,

        I had another like that above, though he is a lower grade teacher. He lives in what now might be a 3 million dollar home, on the outskirts of beverly hills. Same ethnic group as above. His father was a lawyer, and his mother was a realtor. 6% commission on million dollar residences really adds up! It would be interesting to see if he gets anything.

        I had another that is heir to a huge fortune. A big rental company. He has some problems and, if he could find someone competent, could use the money. His family has written him off though, so he likely won't get anything. Again, he LOOKS white!

        Of course I have known some poor whites ALSO! Even ones that would put WHITE on the census! I NEVER lived in a penthouse! I NEVER lived in a $3 million dollar home. If I get ANY money, it will likely be from my father, and he worked to get most of it. At this point, he has a wife, and a step child with special needs, so I don't know how that will end up.

        And HEY, we KNOW how buffet and gates plan to treat THEIR kids!

        BTW HOW OLD is the average heir when they inherit? What impact does that REALLY have? I imagine MOST do NOT get trusts! Those I listed above apparently didn't.

        A LOT of whites are POOR!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955441].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author discrat
          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

          REALLY? Cars MAGICALLY appear if you are black? I have probably been pulled over about 20-30% of the time I saw a cop in the area. ONCE, the guy almost SHOT me! ANOTHER time, had I matched the expected culture, I would have been ARRESTED! ONE guy threatened to arrest me, and tow my car, because someone ELSE hit me! I got maybe 3 tickets! Of course, SOME cops hide, so if they magically appear, maybe you just didn't see them! BTW I HAVE been in cars with non whites, and some were driven by non whites, and I NEVER saw the vehicle get pulled over. I have ALSO been in a caravan of sorts a few times, with non whites, and NONE have gotten pulled over!
          Steve, come on now. So if I win the Lotto. Me. I do. Then based on that fact of ME wining the lotto , the Lotto must be a high probable bet ?

          You have to have a larger sample population than what you state to come up with a fully proven conclusion !
          Signature

          Nothing to see here including a Sig so just move on :)

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955467].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by discrat View Post

            Steve, come on now. So if I win the Lotto. Me. I do. Then based on that fact of ME wining the lotto , the Lotto must be a high probable bet ?

            You have to have a larger sample population than what you state to come up with a fully proven conclusion !
            SORRY, I am only ONE person, but I AM white! My skin is probably medium white, and was paler when I was younger. I have like green/grey eyes. I traced people back quite a bit. So if I am supposed to be filthy rich, I WANT IN! THEY claim that ALL whites have it SO great! So I DON'T have to prove that all are poor. THEY have to prove THEIR assertion by THEIR stated standards.

            Steve
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955618].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

          REALLY? Cars MAGICALLY appear if you are black? I have probably been pulled over about 20-30% of the time I saw a cop in the area. ONCE, the guy almost SHOT me!
          Perhaps he read your posts online. If you gesticulate in the same way you post I'd have my hand on my revolver approaching the vehicle too.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955493].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

            Perhaps he read your posts online. If you gesticulate in the same way you post I'd have my hand on my revolver approaching the vehicle too.
            Believe it or not, I have been called affable, by many!

            At one restaurant near here, I was ACTUALLY VOTED, BY THE EMPLOYEES, as MOST POLITE! I didn't even know they did that sort of thing!

            I was in a class, and the class AUDIBLY gasped when they thought I CUSSED! I said SHOOT!

            I had a nice talk with some people yesterday, joking around, and they said they enjoyed it. I offered to bring them a cricket for company! They said I was there at a time when they generally have NO customers.

            NO, I was NERVOUS, and got out of the car, and he said he almost shot me, and that I should never do that. I was TIRED, it was late, and he stopped me for NO reason!

            Steve
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955631].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    OH YEAH! I had a friend that applied to a college, and was TURNED DOWN! She decided to apply AGAIN, SAME documents! SAME COLLEGE! SHE WAS ACCEPTED! WHY? Well, she DID include her picture, she was an asian female! Do you think THAT is why? SHE DID!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9955458].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    I don't buy it personally. I believe that bigots raise bigots and tolerant families raise tolerant kids. The tribal stuff is mumbo jumbo. I've never felt part of any "tribe." I'm sure I may be different than some, in that I'm not a joiner and never have been. While I am a woman and a human, I don't feel any natural kinship with them. I didn't join the Women's Lib movement or the Up With People movement, religion or any clubs or sororities. I couldn't even stand PTA meetings. I've always had just a select few people that I call friends, and reading the daily news just depresses me and makes me feel even further disassociated with most people.

    Waiting for racism to die along with old white men won't work if they have children. They've already created the next generation of racists.

    There are people who feel the need to belong to clubs, religions, etc., but I don't think that a baby raised without being heavily influenced by family would choose to join, unless there are out of family influences, like society ... for the people who are more conformist types that feel a need to fit in somewhere.

    Robert Wright reports on a recent study that suggests that racism is not an innate characteristic but is learned as we get older. Previous studies had found that seeing a black face triggered a stronger response in the amygdala, the part of the brain that controls emotional response and threat detection. But this new study did an interesting spin on that research:

    In a paper that will be published in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Eva Telzer of UCLA and three other researchers report that they’ve performed these amygdala studies–which had previously been done on adults–on children. And they found something interesting: the racial sensitivity of the amygdala doesn’t kick in until around age 14.

    What’s more: once it kicks in, it doesn’t kick in equally for everybody. The more racially diverse your peer group, the less strong the amygdala effect. At really high levels of diversity, the effect disappeared entirely. The authors of the study write that “these findings suggest that neural biases to race are not innate and that race is a social construction, learned over time.”

    But Wright also makes another interesting point, which is that humans are almost certainly predisposed to break up into groups and to engage in tribalism, but not necessarily based on the divisions we might expect:

    I’m not a blank slater; I don’t believe that we’re born innocent, and only develop a dark side after bad tendencies are engrained by evil capitalists, or evil patriarchs, or evil warmongers, or evil whatevers. I think that, though we’re not naturally racist, we’re naturally “groupist.” Evolution seems to have inclined us to readily define whole groups of people as the enemy, after which we can find their suffering, even death, very easy to countenance and even facilitate.

    But when it comes to defining this enemy–defining the “out group”–people are very flexible. The out group can be defined by its language, its religion, its skin color, its jersey color. (And jersey color can trump skin color–just watch a brawl between one racially integrated sports team and another.) It all depends on which group we consider (rightly or wrongly) in some sense threatening to our interests.

    It’s in this sense that race is a “social construct.” It’s not a category that’s inherently correlated with our patterns of fear or mistrust or hatred, though, obviously, it can become one. So it’s within our power to construct a society in which race isn’t a meaningful construct.

    In other words, tribalism is a flexible thing. More interesting to me is how tribalism affects our thinking, especially when the tribes are based on different ideas rather than on race or geography or that sort of thing. I think it often distorts our thinking, some of us so completely that it renders us predominantly irrational.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956664].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Claude Whitacre
      Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

      I don't buy it personally. I believe that bigots raise bigots and tolerant families raise tolerant kids. The tribal stuff is mumbo jumbo. I've never felt part of any "tribe." I'm sure I may be different than some, in that I'm not a joiner and never have been. While I am a woman and a human, I don't feel any natural kinship with them. I didn't join the Women's Lib movement or the Up With People movement or any clubs or sororities. I couldn't even stand PTA meetings. I've always had just a select few people that I call friends, and reading the daily news just depresses me and makes me feel even further disassociated with most people.

      Waiting for racism to die along with old white men won't work if they have children. They've already created the next generation of racists.
      No. 50 years ago, it was a different country. Bigots teach their kids to be bigots. But it won't stick, if the kids have other input, and most do.

      I'm talking about the entire human race, not just you and me.

      We are not the norm. We are outliers, although not at all alike.

      Here are a few examples of what I mean by tribe.
      Do you have a sports team you are loyal to?
      Are you patriotic in any way? Do you "Buy American"?
      Do you think of any country as your enemy?
      Do you buy locally? Do you feel it's important?
      Do you care for your family more than anyone else?
      Are you part of a political party?
      Are you a member of a church?
      Do you have any group you belong to, that makes you feel closer to the other members?
      Are you a member of an online Forum? Hmmmm?

      If any of these apply, you are a member of a tribe.

      Nobody thinks they are tribal. (Because the word isn't positive) But nearly everyone is.
      In fact, I've never met someone who isn't.
      Signature
      One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

      What if they're not stars? What if they are holes poked in the top of a container so we can breath?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956718].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
        Banned
        Here are a few examples of what I mean by tribe.
        Do you have a sports team you are loyal to?

        I hate all sports equally.

        Are you patriotic in any way? Do you "Buy American"?

        I buy the highest quality product for the budget I'm working with irregardless of where it is manufactured.

        Do you think of any country as your enemy?

        No.

        Do you buy locally? Do you feel it's important?

        The only reason I would buy locally is to procure food that is fresher and freer of chemicals... not because I love my county ... because I don't love it.

        Do you care for your family more than anyone else?

        Any mother who says she doesn't care for the children that she gave birth to more than a stranger is a liar and that is not tribalism.

        Do you think any comedian is funnier, or less funny, because of their race, ethnicity, political opinions, how "blue" they tell jokes?

        I enjoy any comedian who makes me laugh irregardless of their race, ethnicity, politics or whether they tell red or blue jokes. I think dividing a country into red and blue is a ridiculous notion.

        Are you part of a political party?

        No. I have a fair amount of disdain for all political parties and politicians.

        Are you a member of a church?

        No.

        Do you have any group you belong to, that makes you feel closer to the other members?

        No.

        Are you a member of an online Forum? Hmmmm?

        A member ...yes. This forum has given me a user name and password. Does that mean that I feel like I'm a part of something here. No. I came here to make money. Now I'm semi-retired and the money thing here is gone, so I enjoy a little conversation, although conversations like this thread only make me feel more alienated than a part of something.

        If any of these apply, you are a member of a tribe.

        Nobody thinks they are tribal. (Because the word isn't positive) But nearly everyone is.
        In fact, I've never met someone who isn't.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956739].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Claude Whitacre
          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          although conversations like this thread only make me feel more alienated than a part of something.
          Not my intent.

          You don't think a family is a tribe? I would think it was the most natural, strongest tribe.
          A Tribe, being a group that you would defend, and side with, during a disagreement.

          I have a cousin that shook his baby to death. He went to prison. I listened to his mom (my Aunt) go on and on about how terrible the judge was, and how everyone was incompetent.

          After one such long rant (understandable, he was going to prison for a long time), I said "I noticed, that at no time, did you say that he didn't do it". It was at that very moment that she realized, I wasn't part of her tribe. It came as quite a shock to her.

          And now, another relative that will never speak to me again. He was part of her tribe. She was on his side, no matter what. I get it. It would have been to my advantage, if I would have understood this earlier.

          My parent's would make excuses for even the strangest of my early behaviors. I would listen, and assume they couldn't figure out the truth. But that wasn't it. I was part of their tribe. And they would defend me, no matter what. They proved that over and over again.

          Do you have friends that you would do huge favors for? they are part of your tribe. You can belong to many tribes. Some cultural, some social, some because of blood...

          Maybe we use the word Tribe in different ways. I use it as a marketer, it's used to describe any aligned group. Maybe you have a different image when you use the word.

          And the Op was talking about Race, and I'm really not. Oh, well.
          Signature
          One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

          What if they're not stars? What if they are holes poked in the top of a container so we can breath?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956790].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
            Banned
            Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

            Not my intent.
            I didn't mean your contribution to this thread, but the ugliness of racism that comes out in threads like this. But for the topic of tribalism, I don't have strong opinions on it ... I just tend to believe that tribalism is a social construct and largely taught rather than inherited biologically. It may be an inherited tendency for people to live in close proximity with others for protection and survival, but other than that ... the splitting of those groups into people who don't like black people and people who don't like Muslims or Christians or Atheists, or people who don't like Japanese or people who don't like Democrats or Republicans, etc. ... that is learned behavior.

            Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

            You don't think a family is a tribe? I would think it was the most natural, strongest tribe.
            A Tribe, being a group that you would defend, and side with, during a disagreement.
            That's too simplistic. I tend to listen to their arguments, in the case of my children, but do not always agree with or side with their points of view. I will hear them out though. Defend ... as in protect from harm ... if I can, certainly.

            I have 4 children and one of them gives me a fit and I do not condone or defend her choices in any way because they are so self destructive. We still have a good relationship, but she knows that she needs changes and hasn't come to the point where she is willing to make them. My grandchildren are all very young and innocent, so at this point are perfect little angels. lol.

            Now let's take family beyond my children. I never met my mother's side of the family. Talk about a disjointed, dysfunctional family ... that was hers and we were separated by 3,000 miles. My father's side of the family were a bunch of hateful racists and I disowned them in my early teens. My father was a father by virtue of donating sperm and little else. My mother and I had alternating periods of battle and reconciliation and I'm only glad that it ended on reconciliation before she died. So, in no sense of the word, is my family my tribe.

            Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

            I have a cousin that shook his baby to death. He went to prison. I listened to his mom (my Aunt) go on and on about how terrible the judge was, and how everyone was incompetent.

            After one such long rant (understandable, he was going to prison for a long time), I said "I noticed, that at no time, did you say that he didn't do it". It was at that very moment that she realized, I wasn't part of her tribe. It came as quite a shock to her.

            And now, another relative that will never speak to me again. He was part of her tribe. She was on his side, no matter what. I get it. It would have been to my advantage, if I would have understood this earlier.

            My parent's would make excuses for even the strangest of my early behaviors. I would listen, and assume they couldn't figure out the truth. But that wasn't it. I was part of their tribe. And they would defend me, no matter what. They proved that over and over again.

            Do you have friends that you would do huge favors for? they are part of your tribe. You can belong to many tribes. Some cultural, some social, some because of blood...

            Maybe we use the word Tribe in different ways. I use it as a marketer, it's used to describe any aligned group. Maybe you have a different image when you use the word.

            And the Op was talking about Race, and I'm really not. Oh, well.
            I think that I am thinking of tribe in a larger sense of the word, as in races, religions, sports teams, fraternities/sororities, ethnic groups, clubs, political parties, etc. I do not consider a friendship a tribe or doing a favor for a friend as doing it because they are part of my tribe. I have two people that I consider true friends, and one of them only because he is married to my closest friend, so we've become close. She has Alzheimer's, so at this point, she doesn't know we are close friends.

            Some people use the word friend very casually to include most people they know and don't hate for some reason. I really don't.

            According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

            Loyalty to a tribe or other social group especially when combined with strong negative feelings for people outside the group.

            Full Definition of TRIBALISM
            1: tribal consciousness and loyalty; especially : exaltation of the tribe above other groups
            2: strong in-group loyalty
            Note where the definition of tribalism has a meaning of a group of people with some common attributes that are loyal to the group with strong negative feelings for people outside the group.

            By that definition, I am not a member of any tribe.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956811].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post


      Waiting for racism to die along with old white men won't work...
      Let me suggest that, in the candy-store of racism, vanilla is not the only flavor.


      It's not even the dominant flavor.


      Coffee anybody?


      Joe Mobley
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9956904].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

        Let me suggest that, in the candy-store of racism, vanilla is not the only flavor.

        It's not even the dominant flavor.

        Coffee anybody?

        Joe Mobley
        The fact that other races than white have some bigots amongst their folds does not make it ok to be a bigot.

        Everyone knows that there are black people, Asian people, Muslims, Christians, you name it that hate others.

        The fact is, in the US, which is where I live so I don't worry myself over what happens in other countries ... white people have been the ruling class for generations and still are. Black people have not been able to pass laws to suppress the white vote, there were no laws that white people had to sit at the back of the bus, there are no black version of the now defunct Jim Crow laws, you rarely hear of black police gunning down unarmed white people, black people didn't purchase white people as slaves, Indians did not have a White People Removal Act, as did the US government (The Indian Removal Act of 1830), black people did not impose racial zoning laws.... and on and on and on.

        Here's a list of racist laws that were in the past.

        Alto Arizona! - History of Racist U.S. Laws

        So who cares if some black people hate white people? How does that affect me? Not at all. They don't pass laws that limit my civil rights and freedom, so while bigotry is unfortunate in any race, the white rulers of the US government have a history ... a long history that still continues, of passing laws to discriminate against black and other minorities.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957001].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author HeySal
          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          .........black people didn't purchase white people as slaves..........
          .
          Are you sure? Blacks did own slaves. One of the first slave owners in the US was black. And - we had white slaves. The Irish used to be slaves in the US. That means, that there's a chance that blacks did own white slaves. We have to go into percentages to argue about slavery, not into race. Most slave owners were white, and that's the fact in this country - not in other countries, though. White slave owners owned both black and white slaves. That's a fact in the US, too. I've never heard the story of how the Irish were freed from slavery here.....probably at the same time the black ones were. No race is predominantly likely to enslave any race when they have the power to do so. Humans of all races are equally as power hungry with equal capacity to violate whoever has too little power to violate them. Isn't that nice? At least we're all equal at one level.

          ALL humans should be rethinking what we should be as a species instead of pointing to one group or another. If we want to be so sure we're an evolved species, maybe it's time to start acting like evolved individuals.
          Signature

          Sal
          When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
          Beyond the Path

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957026].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
            Banned
            Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

            Are you sure? Blacks did own slaves. One of the first slave owners in the US was black. And - we had white slaves. The Irish used to be slaves in the US. That means, that there's a chance that blacks did own white slaves. We have to go into percentages to argue about slavery, not into race. Most slave owners were white, and that's the fact in this country - not in other countries, though. White slave owners owned both black and white slaves. That's a fact in the US, too. I've never heard the story of how the Irish were freed from slavery here.....probably at the same time the black ones were. No race is predominantly likely to enslave any race when they have the power to do so. Humans of all races are equally as power hungry with equal capacity to violate whoever has too little power to violate them. Isn't that nice? At least we're all equal at one level.
            The fact that some free black people owned slaves does not in any way negate the fact that many more white people owned slaves in the US. There's also a larger story about many black slave owners. As for enslaving the Irish, I didn't say that black people were the only people who were discriminated against by white people in the US. I also mentioned Indians, but that's not all by a long shot.

            How Many Slaves Did Blacks Own?

            So what do the actual numbers of black slave owners and their slaves tell us? In 1830, the year most carefully studied by Carter G. Woodson, about 13.7 percent (319,599) of the black population was free. Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves, out of a total of 2,009,043 slaves owned in the entire United States, so the numbers of slaves owned by black people over all was quite small by comparison with the number owned by white people. In his essay, " 'The Known World' of Free Black Slaveholders," Thomas J. Pressly, using Woodson's statistics, calculated that 54 (or about 1 percent) of these black slave owners in 1830 owned between 20 and 84 slaves; 172 (about 4 percent) owned between 10 to 19 slaves; and 3,550 (about 94 percent) each owned between 1 and 9 slaves. Crucially, 42 percent owned just one slave.

            Pressly also shows that the percentage of free black slave owners as the total number of free black heads of families was quite high in several states, namely 43 percent in South Carolina, 40 percent in Louisiana, 26 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Alabama and 20 percent in Georgia. So why did these free black people own these slaves?

            It is reasonable to assume that the 42 percent of the free black slave owners who owned just one slave probably owned a family member to protect that person, as did many of the other black slave owners who owned only slightly larger numbers of slaves. As Woodson put it in 1924's Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830, "The census records show that the majority of the Negro owners of slaves were such from the point of view of philanthropy. In many instances the husband purchased the wife or vice versa ... Slaves of Negroes were in some cases the children of a free father who had purchased his wife. If he did not thereafter emancipate the mother, as so many such husbands failed to do
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957117].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author HeySal
              Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

              The fact that some free black people owned slaves does not in any way negate the fact that many more white people owned slaves in the US. There's also a larger story about many black slave owners. As for enslaving the Irish, I didn't say that black people were the only people who were discriminated against by white people in the US. I also mentioned Indians, but that's not all by a long shot.
              I understand that - all I was pointing out is that it doesn't matter what color the predominate power group is, they will enslave people if they can. Here in the US it was predominantly whites enslaving blacks - because it was blacks that were available. The slave traders (predominantly Islams) bought blacks from other blacks who captured them for trade from Africa. Here it was whites that bought them because the US was predominantly white at the time, and subsequently, the power group. Had the Natives realized what was coming down, they might have turned the tables on us and we'd have been a nation of Natives owning white slaves.

              My whole point was that - it doesn't matter what color a power group is, they will abuse other groups when they have the opportunity to do so. I in no way was trying to lessen what happened here, or the fact that whites were mostly the guilty party. I was just stating that it's not a "white" issue generally, it's a "power" issue predominantly. Right now we still have issues globally with female slavery, and human trafficking that includes all colors of wealthy. It's what people do generally because people aren't nearly as kewl as they want to believe they are. About all we can do is resist any propaganda that tries to tear us into factions and work to be better humans than the present enslavers our ancestors were.
              Signature

              Sal
              When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
              Beyond the Path

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957180].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                Banned
                Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

                I understand that - all I was pointing out is that it doesn't matter what color the predominate power group is, they will enslave people if they can. Here in the US it was predominantly whites enslaving blacks

                [snip]]

                About all we can do is resist any propaganda that tries to tear us into factions and work to be better humans than the present enslavers our ancestors were.
                Yes ... I agree with all of that. Absolutely. Bigotry isn't really a one race, one ethnic group issue.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957187].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          The fact that other races than white have some bigots amongst their folds does not make it ok to be a bigot.
          Interestingly, some people use slogans like "white privilege" to make it "okay" to practice their bigotry.

          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          Here's a list of racist laws that were in the past.
          I don't live there anymore. I spend most of my time divided between enjoying today and building a better tomorrow.

          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          So who cares if some black people hate white people? How does that affect me? Not at all.
          Let me suggest that there are many whites... and blacks who lived through the Myth of Hands-Up-Don't-Shoot that would disagree with you.


          Joe Mobley
          Signature

          .

          Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957069].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          The fact that other races than white have some bigots amongst their folds does not make it ok to be a bigot.
          NOBODY said it did! QUITE THE OPPOSITE! THANKS for FINALLY acknowledging it!

          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          Everyone knows that there are black people, Asian people, Muslims, Christians, you name it that hate others.
          OK, you just called tens of millions LIARS!!!!! But you should be right here! THANKS for FINALLY acknowledging it!

          Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

          The fact is, in the US, which is where I live so I don't worry myself over what happens in other countries ... white people have been the ruling class for generations and still are.
          OK, that is UTTER BULL, and YOU KNOW IT! Whites have NEVER been "the ruling class", at least not in britain, the US, canada, etc.... Oh SURE, most in a powerful position have been white. And MOST have even been male, but it is FAR from all in EITHER case! And there have been BLACKS, HISPANICS, etc.... that have been in a higher position in ALL those countries!

          Black people have not been able to pass laws to suppress the white vote[/quote]

          OK, that is BEYOND RACIST!!!!!!!!! They are claiming the GOP is racist because they want to make illegal voting harder? And they claim that is the MOST brazen? HECK NO! You want to see one of the most brazen?


          They FINALLY determined that they should be prosecuted, and ERIC HOLDER QUASHED IT!

          there were no laws that white people had to sit at the back of the bus
          OF COURSE NOT! I mean who would then sit there? AW HECK, when I took the metro for all those years, 99% of the time I was STANDING! People standing were all races and sexes, but there WERE a number of blacks, and other non whites, sitting. HEY, that is fine with me, I'm JUST SAYING! IRONICALLY, the last time I was there, I ended up staying in a predominantly BLACK part of the area. I DID get to sit in the morning, and at the very end a lot of times. HEY, the BLACKS DID TOO! WHY? Because it was the end of the line, so MOST people had left, or not gotten on yet.

          there are no black version of the now defunct Jim Crow laws
          WHY WOULD THERE BE? AGAIN, though, you can thank the GOP for getting rid of it. They did NOT start it!

          you rarely hear of black police gunning down unarmed white people
          FUNNY how DOG BITES MAN is so RARELY news! And MOST whites gunned down by police that ARE reported on are reported on WITHOUT mentioning if the policeman was BLACK!

          black people didn't purchase white people as slaves
          YEP, THEY DID! Anthony Johnson (colonist) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          Indians did not have a White People Removal Act
          SOME DID!!!!!! Not all were peaceful!

          black people did not impose racial zoning laws
          They do it ALL THE TIME! Have you ever been in a poor area that is nearly all black? I have! I was even in a school that was half black. A lot of them want to keep with their own group! And many will zone areas with a lot of blacks simply because they expect them to all vote the same. Gerrymandering - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957134].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
            Banned
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            NOBODY said it did! QUITE THE OPPOSITE! THANKS for FINALLY acknowledging it!

            OK, you just called tens of millions LIARS!!!!! But you should be right here! THANKS for FINALLY acknowledging it!

            OK, that is UTTER BULL, and YOU KNOW IT! Whites have NEVER been "the ruling class", at least not in britain, the US, canada, etc.... Oh SURE, most in a powerful position have been white. And MOST have even been male, but it is FAR from all in EITHER case! And there have been BLACKS, HISPANICS, etc.... that have been in a higher position in ALL those countries!

            Black people have not been able to pass laws to suppress the white vote
            OK, that is BEYOND RACIST!!!!!!!!! They are claiming the GOP is racist because they want to make illegal voting harder? And they claim that is the MOST brazen? HECK NO! You want to see one of the most brazen?


            They FINALLY determined that they should be prosecuted, and ERIC HOLDER QUASHED IT!

            OF COURSE NOT! I mean who would then sit there? AW HECK, when I took the metro for all those years, 99% of the time I was STANDING! People standing were all races and sexes, but there WERE a number of blacks, and other non whites, sitting. HEY, that is fine with me, I'm JUST SAYING! IRONICALLY, the last time I was there, I ended up staying in a predominantly BLACK part of the area. I DID get to sit in the morning, and at the very end a lot of times. HEY, the BLACKS DID TOO! WHY? Because it was the end of the line, so MOST people had left, or not gotten on yet.

            WHY WOULD THERE BE? AGAIN, though, you can thank the GOP for getting rid of it. They did NOT start it!

            FUNNY how DOG BITES MAN is so RARELY news! And MOST whites gunned down by police that ARE reported on are reported on WITHOUT mentioning if the policeman was BLACK!


            YEP, THEY DID! Anthony Johnson (colonist) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

            SOME DID!!!!!! Not all were peaceful!

            They do it ALL THE TIME! Have you ever been in a poor area that is nearly all black? I have! I was even in a school that was half black. A lot of them want to keep with their own group! And many will zone areas with a lot of blacks simply because they expect them to all vote the same. Gerrymandering - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

            Steve[/QUOTE]

            What an incoherent bunch of Gobbledygook. lol.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957148].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post





            OK, that is UTTER BULL, and YOU KNOW IT! Whites have NEVER been "the ruling class", at least not in britain, the US, canada, etc.... Oh SURE, most in a powerful position have been white. And MOST have even been male, but it is FAR from all in EITHER case!
            So which is it? Ignorance, denial or lying? Could be a combination of all three with you. Smh
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957152].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
              Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

              So which is it? Ignorance, denial or lying? Could be a combination of all three with you. Smh
              Phfft who cares?? I want to know the juicier stuff. Given Steve's claims, which one of these guys before Obama was passing for white and really was a brother. Can you spot the hair relaxant?


              '
              Signature

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957192].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                Phfft who cares?? I want to know the juicier stuff. Given Steve's claims, which one of these guys before Obama was passing for white and really was a brother. Can you spot the hair relaxant?


                '
                Well, the president is NOT the only one, first of all! So it ISN'T ONE black, it is perhaps tens of THOUSANDS! It may even number into the millions! But I, a white, and my father, and mother, etc.... INDEED, MOST of my family has not been what I could call a member of "the ruling class". I say most ONLY because some of my family IS in politics, so some may have had a hand in laws, etc... ACTUALLY, apparently most of them have been democrats, but one member of my family it turns out IS a republican and won a post that makes some democrats pretty angry. STILL, RULING CLASS implies totality or at least saturation. NEITHER is the case here! HERE is wikipedias definition:

                The ruling class is the social class of a given society that decides upon and sets that society's political policy by mandating that there is one such particular class in the given society, and then appointing itself as that class.
                OOOPS! That means that LEE, WATTS, OBAMA, etc.... CAN'T exist! And people like CARSON, KEYES, CAIN, etc... are IDIOTS, because they have no hope of anyone even HEARING about their campaigns. WHAT'S THAT? Some got elected? ALL ran publicly? OBAMA WON? OOOPS! Whites can't be a ruling class!

                Steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957238].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author butters
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            OK, that is UTTER BULL, and YOU KNOW IT! Whites have NEVER been "the ruling class", at least not in britain, the US, canada, etc.... Oh SURE, most in a powerful position have been white. And MOST have even been male, but it is FAR from all in EITHER case! And there have been BLACKS, HISPANICS, etc.... that have been in a higher position in ALL those countries!
            I must of missed the history lessons where people were completely oppressed and segregated by their race due to white people in power at the time. Heck, the white man used to be able to buy a black slave... Even right now the UK government is actively (apparently) trying to open up the government to more ethnic background people and females. Through out history, white men have been in a position over other ethnicities and oppressed them. It's kinda well known...

            What hispanic and black people have had the highest position in the Britain? Pretty sure the royal family are white... Just saying...
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957201].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author seasoned
              Originally Posted by butters View Post

              I must of missed the history lessons where people were completely oppressed and segregated by their race due to white people in power at the time. Heck, the white man used to be able to buy a black slave... Even right now the UK government is actively (apparently) trying to open up the government to more ethnic background people and females. Through out history, white men have been in a position over other ethnicities and oppressed them. It's kinda well known...

              What hispanic and black people have had the highest position in the Britain? Pretty sure the royal family are white... Just saying...
              They WEREN'T completely oppressed and segregated! Many states did NOT allow slavery! MOST of the people that ran for office were WHITE! And MOST of the people that dictated what people do, at least today, were NOT kings or queens or presidents! Does the queen of Britain really dictate ANYTHING of note today? The president doesn't. Prime ministers don't.

              As for the HIGHEST position in britain, meaning the king/queen, apparently there HAS been some hispanic history there. I don't know about black, but I don't think so. But HEY, that IS the royal family! You know how such things work, right?
              NOW, as to WOMEN in great britain that were in power? HERE are a few:

              1919 - First female MP to sit in Parliament, Nacy Astor

              1979 - First female prime minister, Margaret Thatcher

              1982 - First female leader of the House of Lords, Baroness Janet mary Young

              1992 - First female Speaker of the House of Commons, Betty Boothroyd

              2006 - The first Lord Speaker, Baroness Hayman.

              Here is a snippet about MINORITIES in UK parliament

              Minority ethnic Members of Parliament (Sept 2013)
              Name Constituency Party
              1 Abbott Diane Hackney North & Stoke Newington Labour
              2 Afriyie Adam Windsor Conservative
              3 Ali Rushanara Bethnal Green & Bow Labour
              4 Chishti Rehman Gillingham & Rainham Conservative
              5 Grant Helen Maidstone Conservative
              6 Gyimah Sam East Surrey Conservative
              7 Hendrick Mark Preston Labour
              8 Javid Sajid Bromsgrove Conservative
              9 Khan Sadiq Tooting Labour
              10 Kwarteng Kwasi Spelthorne Conservative
              11 Lammy David Tottenham Labour
              12 Mahmood Khalid Birmingham, Perry Barr Labour
              13 Mahmood Shabana Birmingham Ladywood Labour
              14 Malhotra Seema Feltham & Heston Labour
              15 Nandy Lisa Wigan Labour
              16 Onwurah Chi Newcastle Central Labour
              17 Patel Pritti Witham Conservative
              18 Qureshi Yasmin Bolton Labour
              19 Sarwar Anas Glasgow Central Labour
              20 Sharma Alok Reading West Conservative
              21 Sharma Virenda Ealing Southall Labour
              22 Ummuna Chuka Streatham Labour
              23 Uppal Paul Wolverhampton SW Conservative
              24 Vara Shailesh North West Cambridgeshire Conservative
              25 Vaz Keith Leicester East Labour
              26 Vaz Valerie Walsall Labour
              27 Zahawi Nadhim Stratford upon Avon Conservative
              2.2 Ethnic minority women in Parliament
              Women from ethnic minorities have been particularly under-represented at Westminster.
              Prior to 2010, there had only ever been two black female Members and no Asian woman had
              ever been elected. The 2010 General Election saw the first Asian women MPs. The total
              number of minority ethnic female MPs increased by seven in 2010, and following the
              December 2011 by-election in Feltham and Heston the number of minority ethnic female
              MPs currently stands at 108.
              2.3 The House of Lords
              Information for the House of Lords is more difficult to collate, and no definitive list of ethnic
              origins exists. In July 2000, The Earl of Listowel asked Her Majesty's Government for a
              breakdown of Lords membership by ethnicity. Baroness Jay replied as follows:
              This information is not collected at present. In order to collect personal information
              such as this, the Information Office of the House of Lords would need the authority of a
              domestic sub-committee or the Offices Committee itself. It is for these committees
              whether they wish to consider the matter.9
              8 2 Conservative and 8 Labour.
              9 House of Lords Hansard, 26.07.00, 616 c67WA
              6
              The first Indian peer and probably the first non-white peer, was Sir Satyendra Sinha, created
              Baron Sinha of Raipur, an hereditary peerage, in 1919.10 The first peer of African descent is
              widely reported to have been the Trinidadian cricketer and lawyer Learie Constantine,
              created Baron Constantine of Maraval and Nelson in 1969.
              Based on information from various unofficial sources, including Operation Black Vote, there
              are currently 44 minority ethnic members of the House of Lords, 5.4% of the total
              membership of 801 peers.11
              Ethnic minority Members of the House of Lords by gender and party/group
              01 October 2013
              Female Male All
              Conservative 3 3 6
              Labour 3 8 11
              Liberal Democrat 4 4 8
              Independent 1 5 6
              Crossbench 4 8 12
              Bishops 1 1
              All 15 29 44

              SOOOOOOOO SORRY, THEY aren't all white or all male EITHER!

              Steve
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957247].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    OH YEAH! We were talking about BLACKS in the US, RIGHT? OK:

    African Americans in the 111th Congress

    A list of the African-Americans serving in the 111th Congress. There are 42 black members in the House of Representatives and one in the Senate. Some are women. There HAVE been republicans as well, but this is one tiny example:


    State House Senate
    Alabama Artur Davis (D)
    California Barbara Lee (D)
    Maxine Waters (D)
    Diane E. Watson (D)
    Laura Richardson (D)

    District of Columbia Eleanor Holmes Norton (D)1
    Florida Corrine Brown (D)
    Alcee L. Hastings (D)
    Kendrick Meek (D)
    Georgia Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. (D)
    John Lewis (D)
    Cynthia McKinney (D)
    David Scott (D)
    Henry "Hank" Johnson, Jr. (D)
    Illinois Danny K. Davis (D)
    Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. (D)
    Bobby L. Rush (D) Roland Burris (D)
    Indiana André Carson (D)
    Maryland Elijah E. Cummings (D)
    Donna F. Edwards (D)
    Michigan Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D)
    John Conyers, Jr. (D)
    Minnesota Keith Ellison (D)

    Mississippi Bennie Thompson (D)
    Missouri William Lacy Clay, Jr. (D)
    Emanuel Cleaver II (D)
    New Jersey Donald M. Payne (D)
    New York Gregory W. Meeks (D)
    Yvette D. Clarke (D)
    Charles B. Rangel (D)
    Edolphus Towns (D)
    North Carolina G. K. Butterfield (D)
    Melvin Watt (D)
    Ohio Marcia L. Fudge (D)
    Pennsylvania Chaka Fattah (D)
    South Carolina James E. Clyburn (D)
    Texas Al Green (D)
    Sheila Jackson Lee (D)
    Eddie Bernice Johnson (D)
    Virgin Islands Donna M. Christensen (D)1
    Virginia Robert C. Scott (D)
    Wisconsin Gwen Moore (D)

    As for governor, I will leave the pruning to you, but the following is a list. Last I knew, the mayor of MA is black. Jindal is an Indian, and he wouldn't be considered white:

    Ala. Robert Bentley (R) 2011–2015
    Alaska Sean Parnell (R)4 2009–20142
    Ariz. Janice K. Brewer (D)3 2009–2015
    Ark. Mike Beebe (D) 2011–2015
    Calif. Jerry Brown (D) 2011–2015
    Colo. John Hickenlooper (D) 2011–2015
    Conn. Dan Maolly (D) 2011–2015
    Del. Jack Markell (D) 2009–2013
    Fla. Rick Scott (R) 2011–2015
    Ga. Nathan Deal (R) 2011–2015
    Hawaii Neal Abercrombie (D) 2010–20142
    Idaho C. L. Butch Otter (R) 2011–2015
    Ill. Pat Quinn (D) 2011–2015
    Ind. Mitchell Daniels (R) 2009–2013
    Iowa Terry Branstad (R) 2011–2015
    Kans. Sam Brownback (R) 2011–2015
    Ky. Steven Beshear (D) 2007–20112
    La. Bobby Jindal (R) 2008–2012
    Maine Paul LePage (R) 2011–2015
    Md. Martin O'Malley (D) 2011–2015
    Mass. Deval Patrick (D) 2011–2015
    Mich. Rick Snyder (R) 2011–2015
    Minn. Mark Dayton (D) 2011–2015
    Miss. Haley Barbour (R) 2008–2012
    Mo. Jay Nixon (D) 2009–2013
    Mont. Brian Schweitzer (D) 2009–2013
    Nebr. David Heineman (R) 2011–2015
    Nev. Brian Sandoval (R) 2011–2015
    N.H. John Lynch (D) 2009–2013
    N.J. Chris Christie (R) 2010–2014
    N.M. Susana Martinez (R) 2011–2015
    N.Y. Andrew Cuomo (D) 2011–2014
    N.C. Bev Perdue (D) 2009–2013
    N.D. Jack Dalrymple (R) 2010–2012 2
    Ohio John Kasich (D) 2011–2015
    Okla. Mary Fallin (R) 2011–2015
    Ore. John Kitzhaber (D) 2011–2015
    Pa. Tom Corbett (D) 2011–2015
    R.I. Lincoln Chafee (R) 2011–2015
    S.C. Nikki Haley (R) 2011–2015
    S.D. Dennis Daugaard (R) 2011–2015
    Tenn. Bill Haslam (D) 2011–2015
    Tex. Rick Perry (R) 2011–2015
    Utah Gary R. Herbert (R)5 2009–2013
    Vt. Peter Shumlin (R) 2011–2013
    Va. Bob McDonnell (R) 2010–2014
    Wash. Christine Gregoire (D) 2009–2013
    W. Va. Earl Ray Tomblin (D) 2010–2011
    Wis. Scott Walker (R) 2011–2015
    Wyo. Matt Mead (R) 2011–2015

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957265].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      OH YEAH! We were talking about BLACKS in the US, RIGHT? OK:

      African Americans in the 111th Congress

      A list of the African-Americans serving in the 111th Congress. There are 42 black members in the House of Representatives and one in the Senate. Some are women. There HAVE been republicans as well, but this is one tiny example:

      N.J. Chris Christie (R) 2010–2014
      Tex. Rick Perry (R) 2011–2015

      Steve
      Instead of posting a long list of mostly white politicians (last I noticed, Rick Perry and Christie along with many other names on that list you wanted us to do the pruning of, aren't black.

      As of November 24, 2014, in the House of Representatives, there are 234 Republicans, 207
      Democrats (including 5 Delegates and the Resident Commissioner), and no vacant seats. The Senate has 45 Republicans, 53 Democrats, and 2 Independents, who caucus with the Democrats.

      There are 43 African American Members of the House and 2 in the Senate.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957321].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author butters
    Re read what you wrote one more time please steve...

    OK, that is UTTER BULL, and YOU KNOW IT! Whites have NEVER been "the ruling class", at least not in britain, the US, canada, etc.... Oh SURE, most in a powerful position have been white. And MOST have even been male, but it is FAR from all in EITHER case! And there have been BLACKS, HISPANICS, etc.... that have been in a higher position in ALL those countries!
    You say there has never been a ruling class "EVER"... The English monarchy is the ruling class, especially in the earlier years of the last millennium.... Now the queen has divulged powers to parliament and yes her powers have been weakened and the powers of parliament are greater. Only because something wasn't 100% oppressed doesn't mean that that there wasn't wide spread oppression and segregation. There was widespread oppression, its common knowledge that there has been wide spread oppression under white men through out history. As for, does the president and primeminister dictate anything today... Yes to a certain extent but it is usually comes down to your congress or parliament which has the ultimate decision. Only because of recent event you find more ethnic people in parliament in congress, that can not be said through history... History goes back a lot longer then 100 years...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9957313].message }}

Trending Topics