Lion hunter killed by a lion during an illegal hunt

12 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Lion hunter killed by a lion during an illegal hunt
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    I've seen more convincing articles in tabloids at the Walmart checkout.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361454].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      I've seen more convincing articles in tabloids at the Walmart checkout.

      Too bad you have a problem with the source. It's not an important story anyways.
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361469].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      I've seen more convincing articles in tabloids at the Walmart checkout.
      One thing you can rely on with the Daily Kos ... nothing they write except for their opinions is original. There is always a legitimate source behind their stories. They are a pretty lame publication.

      Lion turns the tables on illegal hunters by killing man looking to shoot him | World | News | Daily Express
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361555].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
        Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

        One thing you can rely on with the Daily Kos ... nothing they write except for their opinions is original. There is always a legitimate source behind their stories. They are a pretty lame publication.

        Lion turns the tables on illegal hunters by killing man looking to shoot him | World | News | Daily Express
        DailyKos seems to be what is known as a "Gatekeeper." It is produced by Markos Moulitsas, the spawn of far right extremists linked to death squads in El Salvador and one-time CIA wannabe. Many things make it suspect such as it's history of censoring evidence related to the problems of voting machines producing suspect and sometimes statistically impossible results.
        Of Burgers, Ballots, and Bogus Polls | The BRAD BLOG
        Signature

        Project HERE.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361598].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
          Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

          DailyKos seems to be what is known as a "Gatekeeper." It is produced by Markos Moulitsas, the spawn of far right extremists linked to death squads in El Salvador and one-time CIA wannabe. Many things make it suspect such as it's history of censoring evidence related to the problems of voting machines producing suspect and sometimes statistically impossible results.
          Of Burgers, Ballots, and Bogus Polls | The BRAD BLOG


          So the sins of the father must be placed on the son?

          And it doesn't look like his claimed party of choice is losing POTUS elections - winning 5 of the last 6 popular votes.

          The Daily Kos is one of the leading progressive outlets online despite it's faults.
          Signature

          "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361658].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
            Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

            So the sins of the father must be placed on the son?

            And it doesn't look like his claimed party of choice is losing POTUS elections - winning 5 of the last 6 popular votes.

            The Daily Kos is one of the leading progressive outlets online despite it's faults.
            Sins of the father? To some extent, maybe, if someone is a beneficiary of blood money. Markos Moulitsas himself oscillated from one extreme to another, until selection "progressive" as his business niche. As long he's suppressing well-documented information, he is suspect. And suppressing information is regressive, not progressive. Who wins is POTUS is neither here nor there. The issue is that the only way to tabulate an election with complete transparency is with hand-counted paper ballots. Until then, US elections will continue to produce statistically impossible results spit out by 100% unverifiable electronic tabulation systems, meaning US democracy is essentially over. All that other stuff is bread and circuses.
            Signature

            Project HERE.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361748].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
              Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

              As long he's suppressing well-documented information, he is suspect. And suppressing information is regressive, not progressive.

              Who wins is POTUS is neither here nor there. The issue is that the only way to tabulate an election with complete transparency is with hand-counted paper ballots.
              Says who? That dude?

              Who wins POTUS may neither be here or there for you but (as the economic stats make plain) - it's a big matter in regards to the standard of living here in the USA.

              Yea, I guess I'd rather have paper than electrons but neither party is complaining.

              Maybe I will if the other side wins the POTUS in 2016 OK?
              Signature

              "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361758].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
                Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                Says who? That dude?

                Who wins POTUS may neither be here or there for you but (as the economic stats make plain) - it's a big matter in regards to the standard of living here in the USA.

                Yea, I guess I'd rather have paper than electrons but neither party is complaining.

                Maybe I will if the other side wins the POTUS in 2016 OK?
                If someone gets elected and does a lousy job, democracy allows voters to choose another leader. Whatever is a big matter to voters won't make a difference if elections are rigged (see link: 'Voting Machines Are Being Manipulated' - Kansas Statistician Explains Her Remarkable Allegations, Evidence: 'BradCast' 8/31/2015 | The BRAD BLOG). I care about democracy and that voters get the leader they actually elected. Personally, I'd like to see either Rand Paul or Bernie Saunders get elected, so as to stop corporate-welfare-socialism in the United States (Bernie Saunders wants a different kind of socialism, LOL). Being a Canadian citizen, I can't vote in American elections. US dirty tricks were seeping their way into Canadian election campaigns, eg false robot call messages to mislead people where to vote, sudden voter ID requirements designed to disenfranchise certain voter demographics
                Signature

                Project HERE.

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361778].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                  Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

                  If someone gets elected and does a lousy job, democracy allows voters to choose another leader. Whatever is a big matter to voters won't make a difference if elections are rigged


                  (see link: 'Voting Machines Are Being Manipulated' - Kansas Statistician Explains Her Remarkable Allegations, Evidence: 'BradCast' 8/31/2015 | The BRAD BLOG).

                  I care about democracy and that voters get the leader they actually elected.

                  Personally, I'd like to see either Rand Paul or Bernie Saunders get elected, so as to stop corporate-welfare-socialism in the United States (Bernie Saunders wants a different kind of socialism, LOL).

                  Being a Canadian citizen, I can't vote in American elections. US dirty tricks were seeping their way into Canadian election campaigns, eg false robot call messages to mislead people where to vote, sudden voter ID requirements designed to disenfranchise certain voter demographics
                  Sounds like a few problems in Kansas and I'm willing to bet if there are problems they are in gop strongholds


                  Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders are polar opposites.

                  The only socialism Bernie wants is more, smarter and better funded safety net programs. He may be into state ownership of certain industries.

                  He's also into infrastructure, going green, while making the rich pay for it - and Paul is absolutely not into any of the above.

                  Sure Paul has a few populist leanings such as no gov surveillance, audit the fed, etc, but by and large - especially economically, he's a sneaky corporate minion - just like his dad.

                  Do you know that Paul once told a crowd that in order to fix the economy, salaries needed to go down?
                  Signature

                  "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361808].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
                    Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

                    Sounds like a few problems in Kansas and I'm willing to bet if there are problems they are in gop strongholds


                    Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders are two polar opposites.

                    The only socialism Bernie wants is more, smarter and better funded safety net programs. He's also into infrastructure, going green, while making the rich pay for it - and Paul is absolutely not.

                    Sure Paul has a few populist leanings such as no gov surveillance, audit the fed, etc, but by and large - especially economically, he's a sneaky corporate minion - just like his dad.

                    Do you know that Paul once told a crowd that in order to fix the economy, salaries needed to go down?
                    I'm not an economist. I'm open to examples of different economic approaches working in different places (as if it matters what I am open to LOL, just another jackass on the Internet). Singapore seems to suggest that a Rand-Paul-like economic approach it can be done successfully, at least in a tiny country.
                    Signature

                    Project HERE.

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361835].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
                      Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

                      I'm not an economist. I'm open to examples of different economic approaches working in different places (as if it matters what I am open to LOL, just another jackass on the Internet). Singapore seems to suggest that a Rand-Paul-like economic approach it can be done successfully, at least in a tiny country.

                      I'm not an economist either but economics is one of my hobbies.

                      And what exactly is that approach?
                      Signature

                      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361839].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Priki
    I don't like to be rude, but people who are hunting animals for trophies, don't deserve this planet. There a lot of things in this world that you can do, but killing animals... no!

    I am not a vegetarian, but I respect the animals and I think they deserve do live as much as we humans.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10361468].message }}

Trending Topics