You Gotta Love Michael Moore

62 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Ok, maybe not, but you gotta give him an 'atta-boy' for trying.

Now what I like about this webpage is not what you'd expect. Just move your cursor over the header graphic and watch the effect. Kinda cool. Same with the other links, they open a box, and I like the effect (it's a geek thing).

There's also a game you can play, (click on the link).

Think about the marketing angles while you're watching/doing these things and you may pick up a few pointers.

Capitalism: A Love Story

KJ
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    I like Michael Moore and all Fearless Truth Seekers.

    Cool site, cute game. I actually did pretty well but I am fired anway... LOL...

    You can't fire me, I QUIT!

    'I'm not gonna work on Maggies Farm no more".
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1199054].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author solardave
      Originally Posted by Patrician View Post

      I like Michael Moore and all Fearless Truth Seekers.

      Cool site, cute game. I actually did pretty well but I am fired anway... LOL...

      You can't fire me, I QUIT!

      'I'm not gonna work on Maggies Farm no more".
      I watched Sicko the other day and I think Patrician is right. He is fearless and I'm looking forward now to watching everything he's put out there.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1199722].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by solardave View Post

        I watched Sicko the other day and I think Patrician is right. He is fearless and I'm looking forward now to watching everything he's put out there.


        He always produces good, informative stuff - on the great issues that actually matter to the American people and our standard of living.

        I won't go to the movies ( since I'm not a movie person ) to see his latest but will check it out when it comes on cable.


        Keep up the good work Mike!

        TL
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1202774].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
    I just read about this in our paper today. I am looking forward to watching this one. Should be both entertaining and informative.
    Signature

    Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1199265].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Well, it turns out foreign countries aren't THAT good as a whole. I spoke with an indian just last friday, and HE said they DO have a lot of hospitals. They DO have a nationalized system. STILL, if you want good treatment, you have to PAY.

    Hey, the friday before last, I had a NASTY injury. I figure it is ALMOST healed about as much as it is likely to. So HERE is what happened, and keep in mind that I HAVE insurance and was already registered at the hospital,...

    I tripped, and landed SQUARE on a counter that cut THROUGH my lip. I mean it ACTUALLY cut through to the mouth. The cut was about an inch long. BLOOD was spurting, and my INR was about 3. That INR meant it would take longer to heal and could be more dangerous.

    Anyway, I couldn't even take a shower. I headed RIGHT to the hospital that, luckily, was only a few miles away. I was lucky in that NOBODY else was there, but I was always afraid someone worse would come in and push me back, because of triage.

    There WAS a delay. They ran me through the usual tests in something like this, and it STILL took me about 3 HOURS to REALLY be taken care of. I was LUCKY it didn't take 4! The surgeon didn't wait for others to check the cat scan, although she DID wait for the cat scan. I had 9 stitches.

    I STILL have a line that, if it doesn't disappear QUICKLY, I will ALWAYS believe was because of the 3 hour delay. My high INR may have actually SAVED me from a WORSE result. I am at least happy that it looks somewhat normal. I THINK the cut was all ABOVE my mustache, so hopefully THAT will grow back normally.

    I LATER went back, last wednesday, at night to have the outside stitches taken out. It took 1.5 hours for them to see me, but that was REAL time. They saw me the moment I passed through those doors. The 1.5 was because I was out of the woods and the LEAST important, so I was placed in their MINOR emergency center where I had to wait for them to take care of about 4 others in front of me.

    I STILL don't know how much that cost me, but it could likely be a few hundred dollars ONLY because I should have met my deductible with the previous test for my aorta surgery.

    Anyway, if they REALLY had FREE national insurance, I might have been out of luck and deformed, or worse, because of the long lines for REALLY simple things like the onset of a cough. Of course, HR3200 is NOT really free, and creates other problems.

    BTW for the record, in case anyone is curious, the surgeon was a black pregnant woman, and she sounded American. I say that only because of other threads here, etc...

    BTW Yeah, I kind of liked sicko ALSO, even though I STILL think it was a bit biased. I may actually PAY to watch capitalism.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1199798].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1201303].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

        Do you really imagine so?

        Never heard of "triage"? (It gets you seen immediately if you're bleeding and someone else has "the onset of a cough", though they wouldn't normally be seen in an ER anyway).
        I SAID....
        Anyway, I couldn't even take a shower. I headed RIGHT to the hospital that, luckily, was only a few miles away. I was lucky in that NOBODY else was there, but I was always afraid someone worse would come in and push me back, because of triage.
        So I guess I DID hear of it. But there ARE other factors. For one, they may think the other person has H1N1, and might not think I was bleeding bad enough. REMEMBER, I COMPRESSED it and was trying HARD to keep it INTACT! I even tried not to talk! I said FEW words until the surgeon was done sewing. The surgeon even said I did a good job of keeping it clean, etc... NOW, only a little over a week later, you would hardly tell it looked like I had a fish gill in my lip. ALSO, if less important people are in front of me? And YEP, the ER is for people that have a problem with insurance, illegals, and people that want to see a doctor NOW!!!!!! The ONLY place that REALLY only takes EMERGENCIES is the ambulance bay. My case was too big of an emergency for that. I couldn't wait an extra 20 plus minutes, and dozens of minutes more for paperwork, and PAY an EXTRA $1000 to be DEFORMED! NO THANKS! I went into the emergency room through the doors. Some IDIOT, when I asked her about the emergency room said I could move my car and save $8, because it was an emergency!!!!!!!!! INCREDIBLE! I'm standing there BLEEDING and she is trying to tell me that! I thought THANKS, but I'll pay the $8!

        National insurance - in countries that have that sort of system - isn't free, by the way. It's just free at the point of consumption of the service. It's paid for collectively by taxpayers (who are effectively subsidising non-taxpayers, for whose care they would end up paying anyway, one way or another, of course, just like you do).

        I hope you're healing well, Steve.
        Yeah, I know that. But the people USING it will TREAT it like it is free! HECK, I usually have to pay $40 JUST to see a doctor! I don't know about THIS insurance, but my LAST policy charged $250 to go to the emergency room through the doors like I did. Of course, the $250 is BILLED, and the $40 is paid to the receptionist.

        and thanks for asking. I don't THINK it will get much better, but I am happy with it as it is and got some mederma for later, as that is supposed to have a good chance of making it better.

        Even like 5 days afteer the surgery, my control over the left side of my lip was VERY limited, and it looked like the left side was 2mm off. That doesn't sound like much but BELIEVE ME, it is NOTICABLE. A couple days ago, it looked like it was off almost 1mm. TODAY, it looks EVEN! The only problem is the scar, which I am hoping I can get rid of, and part of the left side of my mustache is missing. I'm HOPING it grows back. But, there too, it was always SLIGHTLY sparse. maybe it won't be so noticable.

        I EVEN told my mother(she is NOSEY, and now living in my home), NOT to look at my lahey bills. When I go back, I want to see if she notices before I tell her.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1201422].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Scot Standke
    Let me get this straight...

    Michael Moore does an anti capitalism movie.

    How many of the millions and millions of dollars that he is sure to earn in this capitalistic society is he going to give back to the government out of the socialist goodness of his heart.

    This guy is an opportunist at best, not saying his stuff isn't good, but I'm sure it's heavily slanted at best.

    Scot
    Signature

    Discover A New & Profitable Niche Every Day... FREE Niche Ideas + 2 Killer Bonus Items With Resale Rights!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200009].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by Scot Standke View Post

      Let me get this straight...

      Michael Moore does an anti capitalism movie.

      How many of the millions and millions of dollars that he is sure to earn in this capitalistic society is he going to give back to the government out of the socialist goodness of his heart.

      This guy is an opportunist at best, not saying his stuff isn't good, but I'm sure it's heavily slanted at best.

      Scot
      Scot,

      That's the name of his new movie, not the theme. It's about the Wall Street bailout.

      As far as I know, he isn't bitching about making money, he's bitching about giving it to Wall Street.
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200088].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Scot Standke
        Then I retract my statement, that is an issue that certainly is a trouble spot lol

        Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

        Scot,

        That's the name of his new movie, not the theme. It's about the Wall Street bailout.

        As far as I know, he isn't bitching about making money, he's bitching about giving it to Wall Street.
        Signature

        Discover A New & Profitable Niche Every Day... FREE Niche Ideas + 2 Killer Bonus Items With Resale Rights!

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200118].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author OnlineMasterMind
        [DELETED]
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203798].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
          Originally Posted by OnlineMasterMind View Post

          Actually it is anti-capitalism. Very.

          "Capitalism is evil and you cannot regulate evil." -Micheal Moore

          Anyone who remotely supports this guy is either:

          a) ignorant
          b) socialist
          c) both
          You'll also notice that while he's saying capitalism is evil....he damn sure isnt giving his movie away for free.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203814].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Kurt
          Originally Posted by OnlineMasterMind View Post

          Actually it is anti-capitalism. Very.

          "Capitalism is evil and you cannot regulate evil." -Micheal Moore

          Anyone who remotely supports this guy is either:

          a) ignorant
          b) socialist
          c) both
          You claim that "it" is anti-capitalism. To do so, you must have seen the movie...Or you're just ignorant.

          This is a FACTUAL statement.

          Have you watched the entire movie?

          Not to mention, there is a difference between making profit and capitalism.
          Signature
          Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
          Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204008].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

            Not to mention, there is a difference between making profit and capitalism.

            I wish MORE people would realize that! In the US, it is illegal to rip people off, even though the US is SUPPOSED to be capitalist, and ripping people off is a way to make a LOT of money fast. Just look at MADOFF! He basically had a shell game. HE ripped earlier investors off to make a "PROFIT", and ripped later investors off to hide the theft from earlier investors, who then reinvested and moved to the back of the line. Russia, on the other hand, was called communist. I call it russian style communism. The people at the top made a LOT of money though!

            And I call it russian style communism, because the root of the word implies the meaning that was stated when it was first proposed and people FOUGHT to get it. Communism is supposedly the idea of NO profit, with all working for the common good of society. Too bad that just NEVER works. Communist russia was really just an oligarchy. They traded one king for several.

            com⋅mu⋅nism  /ˈkɒmyəˌnɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kom-yuh-niz-uhm]

            -noun 1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
            2. (often initial capital letter) a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.
            3. (initial capital letter) the principles and practices of the Communist party.
            4. communalism.

            Steve
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1206535].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
              Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

              In the US, it is illegal to rip people off, even though the US is SUPPOSED to be capitalist, and ripping people off is a way to make a LOT of money fast.
              I'm confused. Are you suggesting that in capitalism, it should be okay to rip people off, simply because that can make you money?
              Signature
              "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1209699].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

                I'm confused. Are you suggesting that in capitalism, it should be okay to rip people off, simply because that can make you money?
                QUITE THE CONTRARY!

                "In the US, it is illegal to rip people off, even though the US is SUPPOSED to be capitalist, and ripping people off is a way to make a LOT of money fast."

                The REST of the post makes it CLEARER, but what I am saying is that the US is considered capitalist, and it does NOT actually allow ripping people off. ripping people off is just WRONG, and not a part of capitalism. So the too are not only different, but against one another. And russian style communism actually rips people off. It steals from those that provide. Even the lazy that are provided for are being cheated in a way, and definitely used to support the oligarchy and friend's lifestyle.

                Steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1209799].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Michael Moore generally looks at some political contraversy, and plays it in a comedic fashion. I have a feeling capitalism will be his BEST and most fairly done.

    In commercials, for example, there is a scene where he is outside of AIG with bags for the money, and asks where the money is.

    It is called capitalism because many view capitalism as GREED, and see the corporate bailout, and preceeding problem, as capitalism. Frankly, I view it as just greed, paybacks, and extortions. It is more fascistic and russian style communistic than capitalism.

    HECK, I was once turned down for auto insurance by 21st century insurance because I was not at least 25! They offered INEXPENSIVE insurance, even though they DID reject people seen as even moderate risk. I'm told they were ALSO quick to CANCEL! So what is the tie? 21st century is just ONE company owned by "American Insurance Group", now called "American International Group" better known as AIG! They could have EASILY made more money and increased business. I guess they figured they could get paid more ELSEWHERE, but that means a HIGHER risk!

    The IDEA that a company would get BILLIONS for a bailout, and keep having parties that cost MILLIONS, etc....? INCREDIBLE!

    Anyway, I doubt Moore will call that capitalism. Calling that capitalism is like calling the engineering of super viri, and bombs made to mame, HEALTHCARE!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200186].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author johnlagoudakis
    I'm a big fan of Michael Moore.

    I live in Australia and I'm also a big fan of Medicare! (Australia's government-run health system)
    Signature
    Need help getting more leads and sales? *** Click here to work with me ***
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200306].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by johnlagoudakis View Post

      I'm a big fan of Michael Moore.

      I live in Australia and I'm also a big fan of Medicare! (Australia's government-run health system)
      Well, not to make this TOO political, HR3200 is NOT a healthcare plan. We have a medicare but it was deficient and expensive so they allowed PPPs to be included. That sounds NICE! My mother, on medicare, effectively got the same plan I had. She is HAPPY with it. MANY are! Well, Obama wants to SCRAP the PPP option, as he claims they are only middlemen, and wants to cut back on medicare funding to help pay for the HR3200 plan. All the while, they CLAIM the reason for HR3200 is to give us what they have, but that requires only a change to who is qualified, and they exclude their own plan from HR3200 requirements. HECK, MANY would probably be happy if they even just expanded medicare.

      In short, Obama is not trying for what you have, and the U.S. government isn't like other governments. Sometimes, I wish it WERE!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200338].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jgand
    Yeah, you gotta give Michael Moore credit for doing something he believes in. He does take on the controversial subjects.

    And it seems to have paid off for him in the long run.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200555].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author madison_avenue
    I like Michael Moore. I'm a great fan of the British NHS. The best bit of Sicko is when the British politician Tony Benn explains why a publicly funded health service is so important, and so valued by British people:


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1200566].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kenster
    I dislike that guy more than anybody else I can think of at the moment. I disagree with a lot of his opinions but thats not why I dislike him so much.

    Mostly, I dislike how one-sided his arguments are. To me, the most convincing arguments are when somebody presents their side, notes the opposing viewpoints and then tries to refute those viewpoints in a rational way.

    Every work of his Ive seen is soo biased slanted and one sided that you cant take it seriously at all. I like the fact that hes a truth digger but his presenation of his findings have little credibility in my book


    my 2 cents at least
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1201992].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
      Originally Posted by Kenster View Post

      I dislike that guy more than anybody else I can think of at the moment. I disagree with a lot of his opinions but thats not why I dislike him so much.

      Mostly, I dislike how one-sided his arguments are. To me, the most convincing arguments are when somebody presents their side, notes the opposing viewpoints and then tries to refute those viewpoints in a rational way.

      Every work of his Ive seen is soo biased slanted and one sided that you cant take it seriously at all. I like the fact that hes a truth digger but his presenation of his findings have little credibility in my book


      my 2 cents at least
      Then you should stick with Fox News. They even tell you they are fair and balanced, so that should put your mind at rest.
      Signature
      Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
      So that blind people can hate them as well.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1202463].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

        Then you should stick with Fox News. They even tell you they are fair and balanced, so that should put your mind at rest.
        Stephanopoulos, on fox, called Obama on the tax pledge, and obama LIED!!!!! He said it was NOT a tax. As if it made a difference ANYWAY! So Stephanopoulos read the definition from the dictionary. Obama said "That you read the definition to me shows me you are STRETCHING". So fox news is saying that a tax depends on what the definition of tax is like "IS depends on what the definition of is is", the famous statement made by Clinton when HE lied.

        These are the kinds of things you aren't likely to hear on other channels. It is INCREDIBLE!

        BTW I have not been too crazy about Michael Moore either. After seeing sicko, I am just trying to be fair. Sicko WAS biased. I would LOVE ******REAL****** national care, but HR3200 is NOT that. AND, like Moore, I DON'T like the fact that we give TERRORISTS and CRIMINALS better healthcare for FREE!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1202557].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
      Originally Posted by Kenster View Post

      I dislike that guy more than anybody else I can think of at the moment. I disagree with a lot of his opinions but thats not why I dislike him so much.

      Mostly, I dislike how one-sided his arguments are. To me, the most convincing arguments are when somebody presents their side, notes the opposing viewpoints and then tries to refute those viewpoints in a rational way.

      Every work of his Ive seen is soo biased slanted and one sided that you cant take it seriously at all. I like the fact that hes a truth digger but his presenation of his findings have little credibility in my book


      my 2 cents at least
      You forgot to mention inaacurate and intentionally misleading.

      For example, Roger & Me centered on the premise of Michael Moore trying to interview the head of GM. What he didn't tell you in the movie - even once - is that he had PREVIOUSLY interviewed Roger (can't remember his last name). Oh, and he didn't interview him one time, but twice.

      In Sicko, when he went to Cuba, he didn't go to a "regular" hospital. He went to the one the Cuban govenrment told him to go to. Hmm....would a communist government purposely show the best example, or a common one?

      Michael Moore has also had a prior history of covering facts, or INVENTING them. Again, in Roger & Me there is a scene where he talks about Nightline coming to town, or something similar, but it NEVER happened.

      Don't get me wrong, I find him entertaining too. But the problem is TOO many people take what he says as Gospel. Of course, he knows as well as anyone how powerfully entertainment can sway people.

      Funny, I would think Warriors would be AGAINST an anti-capitalist propaganda movie. Oh well, to each their own. Just don't be surprised when they start "redistributing" YOUR profits.

      All the best,
      Michael "No NOT Moore" Oksa
      Signature

      "Ich bin en fuego!"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1211469].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post


        Funny, I would think Warriors would be AGAINST an anti-capitalist propaganda movie. Oh well, to each their own. Just don't be surprised when they start "redistributing" YOUR profits.

        All the best,
        Michael "No NOT Moore" Oksa
        Hi Michael,

        How can any intelligent and fair-minded person be against anything they haven't seen?

        Exactly what part of the movie do you think is "anti-capitalist propaganda"?

        Sounds more to me like anti Michael Moore propaganda, given you couldn't possibly have seen the movie and have based your comments solely on preconceived opinions.

        Hey, maybe you're right, but I want to see the movie before I pre-judge.
        Signature
        Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
        Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1211496].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post


          Hey, maybe you're right, but I want to see the movie before I pre-judge.
          Well, now if you saw the movie first, then there's no way to PRE judge...

          (LOL - sorry. couldn't resist. )
          Signature

          Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1212169].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          Hi Michael,

          How can any intelligent and fair-minded person be against anything they haven't seen?
          Are you call me stupid and unfair minded? (Just kidding, I know you're not actually calling me names). Let me explain...

          Exactly what part of the movie do you think is "anti-capitalist propaganda"?
          I'm basing it on the preview I saw. Which I believe is fair. After all, isn't the preview supposed to give you an idea of what the movie is about? (Notice I don't use the word 'film' as that implies spmething more artistic to me)

          Sounds more to me like anti Michael Moore propaganda, given you couldn't possibly have seen the movie and have based your comments solely on preconceived opinions.
          Fair enough, but keep in mind that I have seen other Michael Moore movies and know the types of movies he makes. So, yes they are preconceived notions, but they are also preconceived based on his body of work. For example, I wouldn't go to a Tim Burton movie expecting a "chick flick".

          Hey, maybe you're right, but I want to see the movie before I pre-judge.
          I may be wrong, too. I doubt that I am, but it's not 100% impossible. I can virtually guarantee there will be a gross distortion of facts - that alone is enough for me to criticize it. Not because he's not allowed to take license with the facts, BUT because he presents his stuff as "documentaries" and truth.

          Just playing a bit with your last sentence: "I want to see the movie before I pre-judge." Technically, you can only pre-judge BEFORE you see the movie. But I know what you mean. You would rather reserve judgement until AFTER you have seen it.

          As I said before, I enjoy watching his movies, they ARE entertaining, but it's important to know that they are more fiction and contrived reality than he will ever admit.

          His take is that it's okay to distort the facts and lie, as long as the ends justify the means. But that's where his thinking is completely wrong. IF he believes in a certain cause, then he should be able to present the unadulterated truth to make the same point.

          "The truth shall set you free"

          "The modified, distorted truth shall mean you are watching a Michael Moore movie"

          Anyway, I'm sure it will make for good viewing. As long as it's not being viewed for any type of fact-gathering or educational purposes.

          All the best,
          Michael

          p.s. If you haven't seen it, check out the movie Michael & Me. Very interesting, and I belive it to be quite fair. In fact, the first half of the movie it seems very much pro-Moore, and it never seems to go completely anti-Moore. Just more of a "looking for answers" type of thing.
          Signature

          "Ich bin en fuego!"
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1212182].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author madison_avenue
    steve

    Anyway, if they REALLY had FREE national insurance, I might have been out of luck and deformed, or worse, because of the long lines for REALLY simple things like the onset of a cough. Of course,
    There is a free NHS in Britain and you don't get long lines of people with a cough. This is because if you have a cough, you have to go to your GP (local doctor) not the hospital. It's only if it's serious do you call an ambulance or go to the hospital direct.

    I had a sore throat about two weeks ago, I went down to see my local doctor, waited about 20 minutes, he checked me out thoroughly, we had a chat and he gave me some antibiotics. If the GP thinks it's something serious he will send you for further testing at the local hospital. My GP is very rigorous about testing so he has done this a couple of times. Total cost for all this excellent health care? Free.

    I know it is not actually free i.e a National Insurance contribution is deducted from your wages, but you know that everyone pays it and they are all paying the same percentage. If you don't work you don't have to pay it. So really it feels free, because when you actually use the health service, it's free.

    The main advantage of a free health service is that you don't have to worry about, if you have a problem you just go to see your local doc or go to the hospital. This leaves you free to concentrate on your work and business, freeing up time.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1202403].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by madison_avenue View Post

      steve

      There is a free NHS in Britain and you don't get long lines of people with a cough. This is because if you have a cough, you have to go to your GP (local doctor) not the hospital. It's only if it's serious do you call an ambulance or go to the hospital direct.

      I had a sore throat about two weeks ago, I went down to see my local doctor, waited about 20 minutes, he checked me out thoroughly, we had a chat and he gave me some antibiotics. If the GP thinks it's something serious he will send you for further testing at the local hospital. My GP is very rigorous about testing so he has done this a couple of times. Total cost for all this excellent health care? Free.

      I know it is not actually free i.e a National Insurance contribution is deducted from your wages, but you know that everyone pays it and they are all paying the same percentage. If you don't work you don't have to pay it. So really it feels free, because when you actually use the health service, it's free.

      The main advantage of a free health service is that you don't have to worry about, if you have a problem you just go to see your local doc or go to the hospital. This leaves you free to concentrate on your work and business, freeing up time.
      Well, they HAVE had lines HERE with people that didn't seem very important. AND, as I said, the hospital I went to had TWO sections of the emergency department. ONE is called EMERGENCY, and EVERYONE is directed to THAT receptionist! The other is MINOR EMERGENCY.

      I don't even have a "GP" because there is little reason to, but GPs are apparently LIMITED here, because it costs too much to become a doctor, and they don't make ennough. And I have not had much luck trying to see ANY doctor is a really reasonable amount of time.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1202545].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    I can't say as im a big michael moore fan. The way he presents stuff is made to be inflammatory and create controversy. He does this with a onesided argument and skewed facts. I watched bowling for columbine and its ridiculous
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203306].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    What's the prob with Mike Moore??

    Is it that this guy embarrasses us??

    I'm sure he's doing more good than harm with stuff like...

    Roger & Me: How GM was outsourcing jobs to other countries.

    Sicko: Pointing out problems with the American health care system.

    Bowling For Columbine: Didn't really see this one but it had something to do with gun control.

    Fahrenheit 911: About the reign of Bush The Second

    Capitalism a Love Story: Should be very interesting regarding the big C, Wall Street, class warfare & the effect on our nation.

    Did I miss any of his other movies???

    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203526].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

      What's the prob with Mike Moore??

      Is it that this guy embarrasses us??
      I'm sure he's doing more good than harm with stuff like...
      no, its because he creates drama with half truths and partial stories..for instance:
      Roger & Me: How GM was outsourcing jobs to other countries.
      but he forgot to point out that the major reason gm was outsourcing was because highschool educated american workers used the uaw to guarantee them jobs at wages that were ridiculous for their education and skill levels

      Sicko: Pointing out problems with the American health care system.
      but also forgot to point out that while there are problems with the healthcare system in the u.s., there are problems with every large system and by and large the skill level of the physicans in the u.s. medical system far outpace their contemporaries in other countries

      Bowling For Columbine: Didn't really see this one but it had something to do with gun control.
      but forgot to point out the old addage that guns dont kill people, people kill people. its not the proliferations of weapons that causes things like the columbine high massacre, its parents that dont pay attention to their kids (read: 2 weeks of breaking glass in a garage to make bombs and parents didnt see why)
      Fahrenheit 911: About the reign of Bush The Second
      so many partial truths to get across his point the wf servers couldn't hold them all. I'm not a bush fan in any way but een i could see that a lot of skewed b.s. was used in this film.

      Capitalism a Love Story: Should be very interesting regarding the big C, Wall Street, class warfare & the effect on our nation.

      Did I miss any of his other movies???

      TL
      Dont get me wrong, he is entertaining, but he's not walter kronkite, he's more like dan brown with the da vinci code. about 80% truth but 20% b.s. to make the story actually make sense. Unfortuantely the 20% is completely fabricated and wildly innacurate.

      Moore is like many others that know that the American population is like a huge herd. you can spook the whole herd by with the snap of a twig of an unseen threat
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203633].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

        no, its because he creates drama with half truths and partial stories..for instance:

        but he forgot to point out that the major reason gm was outsourcing was because highschool educated american workers used the uaw to guarantee them jobs at wages that were ridiculous for their education and skill levels


        but also forgot to point out that while there are problems with the healthcare system in the u.s., there are problems with every large system and by and large the skill level of the physicans in the u.s. medical system far outpace their contemporaries in other countries


        but forgot to point out the old addage that guns dont kill people, people kill people. its not the proliferations of weapons that causes things like the columbine high massacre, its parents that dont pay attention to their kids (read: 2 weeks of breaking glass in a garage to make bombs and parents didnt see why)

        so many partial truths to get across his point the wf servers couldn't hold them all. I'm not a bush fan in any way but een i could see that a lot of skewed b.s. was used in this film.



        Dont get me wrong, he is entertaining, but he's not walter kronkite, he's more like dan brown with the da vinci code. about 80% truth but 20% b.s. to make the story actually make sense. Unfortuantely the 20% is completely fabricated and wildly innacurate.

        Moore is like many others that know that the American population is like a huge herd. you can spook the whole herd by with the snap of a twig of an unseen threat
        Your objections are duly noted.

        All The Best!!

        TL
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203658].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Yeah, I forgot about the colombine one. That WAS crazy. I don't think I saw fahrenheit. I didn't see roger and me. I wonder what his take was on THAT!

    And TL, There really ISN'T any attack on the poor by the middle class, other than to counter the attacks THEY create because they claim we DO!

    Maybe they would do better to JOIN us in trying to get government to make things FAIR!

    Then again, that means NO unions, and fewer handouts, so I guess the "poor" will never go for it.

    Then again, if a robber steals from you, and you try to grab it back, is that REALLY an attack against them?

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203545].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      Yeah, I forgot about the colombine one. That WAS crazy. I don't think I saw fahrenheit. I didn't see roger and me. I wonder what his take was on THAT!

      And TL, There really ISN'T any attack on the poor by the middle class, other than to counter the attacks THEY create because they claim we DO!

      Maybe they would do better to JOIN us in trying to get government to make things FAIR!

      Then again, that means NO unions, and fewer handouts, so I guess the "poor" will never go for it.

      Then again, if a robber steals from you, and you try to grab it back, is that REALLY an attack against them?

      Steve
      I'm not sure what you're talking about...

      I don't believe there's a attack by the middle on the poor.

      I believe if there's any class warfare in America it's the rich along with powerful corporations against all of us whom are not rich.

      I have no prob with people trying and getting rich but don't use the federal & state govs to enrich yourself at the expense of the living standards of the average American.

      I have a problem with that.

      To paraphrase Warren Buffet...

      yeh, there's a class war and my class is winning.

      FDR called them economic royalists and he was also called a traitor to his class.

      What's your prob with unions?

      Of course they are not perfect but should they be abolished in your opinion????

      TL
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203573].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

        I'm not sure what you're talking about...

        I don't believe there's a attack by the middle on the poor.

        I believe if there's any class warfare in America it's the rich along with powerful corporations against all of us whom are not rich.

        I have no prob with people trying and getting rich but don't use the federal & state govs to enrich yourself at the expense of the living standards of the average American.

        I have a problem with that.

        To paraphrase Warren Buffet...

        yeh, there's a class war and my class is winning.

        FDR called them economic royalists and he was also called a traitor to his class.

        What's your prob with unions?

        Of course they are not perfect but should they be abolished in your opinion????

        TL
        Unions are SUPPOSED to better the industry(They make it WORSE), improve working conditions(They don't generally do that now, and there are LAWS in place), and bring a FAIR wage($80K/year for turning a few bolts is NOT fair). HECK, look at GM! They bankrupt the company, steal money from tax payers and investors, and put it into their pension fund, etc.... Or how about the TEACHERS having STUDENTS campaigning with them, striking over competency tests, and getting tenure? EVEN that HR3200 bill I hate says everyone MUST BE UNION! Does ANYONE here think that will LOWER costs? It RAISES them everywhere else! YEP, I have a LOT of problems with them! And YEAH, I think they should ALL be abolished!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203618].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    "Then again, that means NO unions, and fewer handouts, so I guess the "poor" will never go for it. "

    Two very big misconceptions.

    That unions get handouts and that the poor survive off handouts.

    The unions would never have been possible if they hadn't been needed.
    The truth is,unions can have corrupt management just like businesses can.
    Don't blame the unions, blame the leaders.

    By the way, I was a union steward for 10 years. The leadership I was under was not terribly corrupt. The leadership that took over was terribly corrupt.
    Its the same as with our corporations and/or goverment,you don't disband it because there are problems, you get rid of the problems and what is causing them.

    Edit: Apparently Seasoned/Steve posted while I was composing my post. I have to say that I found the majority of his post to be incorrect in my opinion, and that is based on actually being a union steward for 10 years. Before I became a union steward,I had been brainwashed with all the stuff he is saying, but I found that most of it is fabricated untruths.
    One example is GM. The unions didn't bankrupt GM, poor management along with poor overpriced products did.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203620].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      "Then again, that means NO unions, and fewer handouts, so I guess the "poor" will never go for it. "

      Two very big misconceptions.

      That unions get handouts and that the poor survive off handouts.

      The unions would never have been possible if they hadn't been needed.
      The truth is,unions can have corrupt management just like businesses can.
      Don't blame the unions, blame the leaders.

      By the way, I was a union steward for 10 years. The leadership I was under was not terribly corrupt. The leadership that took over was terribly corrupt.
      Its the same as with our corporations and/or goverment,you don't disband it because there are problems, you get rid of the problems and what is causing them.

      Edit: Apparently Seasoned/Steve posted while I was composing my post. I have to say that I found the majority of his post to be incorrect in my opinion, and that is based on actually being a union steward for 10 years. Before I became a union steward,I had been brainwashed with all the stuff he is saying, but I found that most of it is fabricated untruths.
      One example is GM. The unions didn't bankrupt GM, poor management along with poor overpriced products did.
      Well, I WAS talking in the context of the poor that want all this stuff. I don't know what union YOU are with.

      Yeah, I can imagine that they once WERE needed. There weren't rules against firing, discrimination, VERY low wages, lack of benefits, workplace safety, etc... There certainly are NOW! As for the poor overpriced products from GM? WHO made them? WHO cost the most from the labor side? GRANTED the CEO got a LOT of money, but if he cut back on his salary, and lowered the price of those vehicles, do you REALLY think he could pay all those workers?

      $176 billion Debt
      91,000 US employees
      CEO salary in 2008 was 8.7 million

      So the CEO was making less than $96 for each US employee. Apparently, the average GM employee DOES make about $80K or more. CNN said:

      NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - General Motors is offering hourly workers as much as $140,000 each to leave the troubled automaker as it extends its push to cut labor costs and put an end to billions of dollars in losses.
      Let's take the 80K average:

      7,280,000,000 7.28 BILLION!

      They need to make 19,945,206+ a day to cover labor costs.

      and the unions DO get handouts. Obama said so, I have seen it in places like HR3200, and look at GM!

      steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203740].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    But there is an underlying theme,and that is fix the problems!
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203673].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Someone called him the left wing Glenn Beck.


    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203684].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

      Someone called him the left wing Glenn Beck.


      TL
      I guess I could live with THAT! If they teamed up, agreed, and could get others to listen to them, they could show a truth few would ever see. Moore IS left, although not quite so radical as some are, and Beck is right, and just upset about all the garbage and he obviously doesn't understand any more than I do about why people won't listen. They both have a similar way of trying to get their point across.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203762].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    "Well, I WAS talking in the context of the poor that want all this stuff. I don't know what union YOU are with."

    The operative word is "was". What union I WAS with.
    I was with the APWU.
    Sure, I saw a lot of abuse,by the union leaders, (not too much though,because as I stated, the union leadership I was under was pretty honest and reputable) by the employees,( A LOT of abuse there) and management.( ALso A LOT of abuse).

    But you want to blame the unions for the other peoples abuse. Let me tell you, I had to defend people that had no desire to work,whether they were union members or not. And most of the people that abused the system were the ones that were not union members, but they definitely took advantage of the union benefits without contributing to the union. You know the type, they took the union salary they got, the union vacations they got, the union medical care that they got,but they didn't join the union or pay union dues.
    Who hired these people? Heres a clue: it wasn't the union.
    Now, you remember the phrase "going postal"?
    It wasn't given to someone unjustly. Postal management was intentionally abusive.
    I had a person I worked with that had a manager come stand behind him for literally hours at a time and watch him work. After quite a long time of this, the employee snapped,and gave him a shove backwards. The employee got terminated. It took almost 2 years,but he got his job back,and rightly so, he had been harrassed needlessy, but thats what management did best.
    They didn't worry about budget, they didn't worry about performance or even public perception, they were more concerned with getting rid of the employees that were not asskissers.
    One thing I never got over was the fact that we were written up for clocking in or out of our prescribed time range. We were disciplined for clocking in too early or too late, even thogh we had so many employees doing it at the same time that we physically couldn't do it within the prescibed time range.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203784].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Anyone who makes statements like this is either:

    a) ignorant
    b) ignorant
    c) both
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203818].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    That's a little strong.

    I don't believe capitalism is evil and it can not be regulated.

    I don't believe everything he says or believes etc. but...

    I do believe Mr. Moore does a lot more good than harm and believing so does not make me the I word or the S word.


    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203821].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

      That's a little strong.

      I don't believe capitalism is evil and it can not be regulated.

      I don't believe everything he says or believes etc. but...

      I do believe Mr. Moore does a lot more good than harm and believing so does not make me the I word or the S word.


      TL
      I think mr. moore does more good...for himself. I dont believe he is trying to educate anyone. I believe he is trying to whip up people who dont actually read the fine print so that they will think he really knows what he's talking about and rush right out and buy movie tickets when he makes movies and buy his books.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204058].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
        Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

        I think mr. moore does more good...for himself. I dont believe he is trying to educate anyone. I believe he is trying to whip up people who dont actually read the fine print so that they will think he really knows what he's talking about and rush right out and buy movie tickets when he makes movies and buy his books.


        So...

        In you opinion is he doing sorta the same thing as Glenn Beck but from the left's point of view?

        TL
        Signature

        "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204070].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
          Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

          So...

          In you opinion is he doing sorta the same thing as Glenn Beck but from the left's point of view?

          TL
          Yes..and on the movie screen.

          I think both of them are fear mongers and b.s. salesmen. They use people's inate distrust of the government to rile them up with stories that are sort of true, but have had 'creative license' taken in the retelling of the facts.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204083].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Of course it doesn't TL.
    Hence my reply!
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203839].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      Of course it doesn't TL.
      Hence my reply!
      And it was quite appropriate my good fellow.

      TL
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203856].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    As the saying goes, you can't argue with a closed mind, hence the end of my discussion with you.
    But for the record, very few people that know me would say I was ignorant OR believe in socialism.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203930].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author OnlineMasterMind
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203936].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author KimW
        Originally Posted by OnlineMasterMind View Post

        Birds of a feather flock together.
        So, Since your "flocking" here, are you saying your an ignorant socialist?


        I'm just asking...........
        Signature

        Read A Post.
        Subscribe to a Newsletter
        KimWinfrey.Com

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203957].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Sometimes he does strike me as overly idealistic but that's no reason ( in this case ) to declare him the enemy of civilization.

    I have a feeling that if pressed, he would say that "unfettered" capitalism is evil and I'll second that notion.

    anyways...

    I'm not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

    If I'm a socialist you're a fascist...

    ... and I still believe he does a whole lot more good than harm.

    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203954].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    TL,
    I was taught many many years ago that when someone doesn't have anything intelligent to say,that is when they resort to name calling.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203964].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      TL,
      I was taught many many years ago that when someone doesn't have anything intelligent to say,that is when they resort to name calling.
      Word.

      What's next with this dude???

      Will we be called unpatriotic??


      TL
      Signature

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1203994].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    While its not as serious a subject matter, this reminds me of the thread that someone posted about a review of The Beatles version of Rock Band. Of course, he was posting wanting the review a couple of weeks before it was released.

    Here we are getting a movie version of that thread.


    "This movie opens on Friday, October 2. Showtimes are not yet available in your area."
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204025].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    What I find so interesting is this conversation taking place in a MARKETING forum.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204082].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      What I find so interesting is this conversation taking place in a MARKETING forum.
      Kim,

      The OP was about the landing page that MM is using for the movie. There is a lot of cutting edge stuff going on there (imo).

      Now, can anybody guess why I didn't post this on the Main Forum?

      KJ
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204459].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    But, as I said earlier, there is an underlying theme,and that is fix the problems!
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204155].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204185].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
      Originally Posted by TLTheLiberator View Post

      So...

      would you say that Mr. Moore & Mr. Beck are in the same business - just from different angles???

      TL
      Pretty much. Mr Beck is telling you why liberals are tearing the country apart, Mr Moore is telling you why big business and conservatism is tearing the world apart. All we need now is someone pointing out ralph nader's fault in song and we'll have the complete set.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204219].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    writing song as we speak!!
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1204246].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BKenn01
    "You gotta love Michael Moore"

    No I dont!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1205571].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author scarcius121
    I'm looking forward to seeing the new movie. I like to hear both sides of any argument because that's the best way to make an informed decision. Michael Moore does a pretty good job of presenting whatever his opinion is in an entertaining way.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1211465].message }}

Trending Topics