Buzz Aldrins UFO Encounter

34 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |

Interesting...

Even more interesting is the fact that this is the first confirmed sighting of a UFO, or in other words genuine, (the evidence that follows makes this a slam dunk).


First we have this brave astronaut, publicly admitting that NASA tells them to clam up on things like this, (Buzz later said that his statement that this was a UFO, was taken out of context, and he was really saying, (as NASA said) that this was one of the panels, but as the overwhelming evidence that follows shows, it definitely wasn't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=8VvfTY-tVzI
https://youtu.be/7ipCXpkSOwc

Go about 4.30 in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=dRCdcf9hQQk
https://youtu.be/dRCdcf9hQQk

Go about 3.00 in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=7ipCXpkSOwc
https://youtu.be/8VvfTY-tVzI

Go about 5.30 in. This one clearly shows the last stage keeping up, but also losing ground, and the supposed panels being the UFO more so.


But maybe it was a Russian probe, nope..

Russian spacecraft landed on moon hours before Americans - Telegraph



Sure it looks similar, but this crashed into the moon by the time Apollo took off, (so no Russians).


But maybe it was the Panels blown off when the CM, extracted the LM, as Buzz and NASA claims, ok, we will see if they look and act the same?





I screencaptured the UFO from the video.








The last one is a real image of the panels.



So it doesn't look like one of the panels, move like one of the panels or has the height.



By the time Buzz saw whatever, (and later on other Apollo astronauts video taped it) the panels were 11,000 km's away!

So we are expected to believe that a 10+ ton panel, 11,000km away is this????



This has to be the worst cover story NASA has ever come up with, and Buzz, has to go alone with them, as breaking a confidentiality agreement could get him kicked out of NASA or thrown in jail.

A hand held video camera from the 70's, can't get this level of detail at 11,000 k's away, a blurry dot is the best it could do. 5 - 30 km's maybe, but 11,000 nope, virtually impossible.

So this is the first iron clad, concrete proof that NASA is lying, and UFO's are actually real!

Thankyou.

  • Profile picture of the author DWolfe
    Were they little green men like Gazoo on the Flintstones.
    Signature

    Long time Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. Click here to help her out: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11316860].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cearionmarie
    Been interested in the concept of UFO's and underwater monsters, but all I've been seeing so far are recycled content and much of the hype and less of the actual encounters.
    Signature

    Cearion Uy - Marketing Advisor
    www.phlanx.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11316924].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author tagiscom
      Originally Posted by cearionmarie View Post

      Been interested in the concept of UFO's and underwater monsters, but all I've been seeing so far are recycled content and much of the hype and less of the actual encounters.
      True, this one dismisses most of the answers me get on Earth, like swamp gas, birds and so forth, or someone throwing a plate in the air.

      This was filmed in space between the Earth and the moon, when all we had up there was half a dozen smashed rockets on the moon, and Sputnik in orbit.

      And NASA's answer is laughable, they know it wasn't one of the panels, so they intentionally bury UFO storys.

      Looks like Bluebook was a smokescreen, to make the public think that they were investigating.

      If NASA has lied about this, then it opens up the door to other things, Mars being at the tip of the iceberg.

      But suffice to say that this shuttle, most likely from a hidden base on Earth, (probably the Arctic region) was being controlled by something, (most likely grays) and headed for a moon base.

      They also did it when NASA was doing launches so to say, yep, UFO's are real.

      Which they are, but it is not every day you can take a squiz at a legit alien craft, but here it is.

      We need a rocket, and tens of thousands of people to get there, and they use a shuttle the size of a family car to do the same.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11316986].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
    Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

    It's safe to discard any "proof" that uses the words extrapulation (sic) and astranauts (sic).

    What you've posted is far from being "iron clad", and is more likely to be tinfoil clad.
    Signature
    Long time Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. Click here to help her out: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317333].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Frank Donovan
    Signature
    I've just put Richard Branson's number on speed-dial. I call it my "Get-Rich-Quick" scheme.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317339].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Claude Whitacre
    What this shows me is that anyone can have delusions...or believe wild conspiracy theories. Even educated people.

    And if you really get to know someone in authority...senators, governors, experts, even scientists....you find out that some of them are as bat shit crazy as everyone else.
    Signature

    Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. You can help.
    Click Here: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317343].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author OptedIn
    Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

    So this is the first iron clad, concrete proof that NASA is lying, and UFO's are actually real!:
    No. This is nothing more than proof that you will shovel the same bullshit until your dying breath. :-)

    BTW - didn't that one video have a ghost in it?

    You're welcome.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317398].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tagiscom
    Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

    It's safe to discard any "proof" that uses the words extrapulation (sic) and astranauts (sic).

    What you've posted is far from being "iron clad", and is more likely to be tinfoil clad.
    Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

    What this shows me is that anyone can have delusions...or believe wild conspiracy theories. Even educated people.

    And if you really get to know someone in authority...senators, governors, experts, even scientists....you find out that some of them are as bat shit crazy as everyone else.
    Originally Posted by OptedIn View Post

    No. This is nothing more than proof that you will shovel the same bullshit until your dying breath. :-)

    BTW - didn't that one video have a ghost in it?

    You're welcome.
    Yeah, blah, blah, blah, how about you all try to show how a 10 ton panel spinning 11,000km, away magically travels alongside the Command Module?

    And apparently starts spinning the wrong way, and takes on extra shapes and dark lines, and becomes taller.

    As l said, concrete,
    and all of the tinfoil hats, bullshit and crazy all rests on your side!

    Thankyou!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317428].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author OptedIn
      Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

      As l said, concrete,
      The only concrete I see lies between your ears. :-)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317435].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
      Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

      Yeah, blah, blah, blah, how about you all try to show how a 10 ton panel
      You weighed it did you? Did anyone else? Who's arse was the 10 ton figure pulled from?

      It must get very lonely atop that ivory pedestal you've built for yourself. (Yeah, I know that's a mixed metaphor, but WTF)

      Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

      As l said, concrete,
      You seem to have a rather unique interpretation of what constitutes "concrete proof", one which crumbles under even slight scrutiny.
      Signature
      Long time Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. Click here to help her out: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317546].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tagiscom
        Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

        You weighed it did you? Did anyone else? Who's arse was the 10 ton figure pulled from?

        It must get very lonely atop that ivory pedestal you've built for yourself. (Yeah, I know that's a mixed metaphor, but WTF)

        You seem to have a rather unique interpretation of what constitutes "concrete proof", one which crumbles under even slight scrutiny.
        The ten ton panel was pulled from NASA tech, specs, (and it was actually 11. something, of a ton per panel).

        Crumbies, lol, ok, how about you tell us how the panels magically teleport from 11,000 k's away, and end up in the same area as the CM/LM?

        I have discussed this elsewhere, with a pack of vultures, trying to disprove this in any way they could find.

        In the end, they couldn't!

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317585].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Claude Whitacre
      Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

      And apparently starts spinning the wrong way, and takes on extra shapes and dark lines, and becomes taller.
      :
      Everything that revolves at all (or moves in space relative to the observer) changes shape, except perfect spheres.
      Signature

      Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. You can help.
      Click Here: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317705].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

        Everything that revolves at all (or moves in space relative to the observer) changes shape, except perfect spheres.
        AKA Claude's body type.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317709].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author OptedIn
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          AKA Claude's body type.
          That's about as far from perfect as you can get.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317750].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author lanfear63
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          AKA Claude's body type.
          "AKA Claude's blobby type"

          Fixed
          Signature

          Where ever you go, there you are.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317824].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tagiscom
        Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

        Everything that revolves at all (or moves in space relative to the observer) changes shape, except perfect spheres.
        True, this video shows one of the panels flying away, (22.00) from the CM before docking with the LM, (Apollo 8 was the only one that allowed the panels to stay in Earth orbit and later burn up, all other missions the PLR panels were blown off, but kept relative speed to the last stage, eventhough they drifted away from it).

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=zp_RDqPQ-qg
        https://youtu.be/zp_RDqPQ-qg

        So this is what Buzz, and NASA say that the UFO was!!!!

        But maybe some official at NASA back then was on something and came up with this seriously stupid explanation?

        Nope, Buzz made a statement a few years ago, and publically admitted that it was one of the panels, and NASA hasn't said otherwise.

        So NASA has almost 50 years to correct this, or publically admit that it was a UFO, or Buzz for that matter.

        I have discussed this at great length elsewhere, and had to do a lot of research, (which in itself was interesting) to back up the evidence. NASA does not want to publically admit that aliens are in our back yard, and Buzz doesn't want to either, (eventhough many have tried and failed, he always cancelled).

        Obviously with private enterprize becoming more prevalent in space it is only a matter of time, but NASA wants to keep a lid on it, for a short while.

        But the evidence speaks for itself, and there is no other explanation.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317930].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
          Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

          and had to do a lot of research
          There's nothing like spending your time productively, eh.

          Thank you for summing up in a nutshell (that word was deliberately chosen) why you are the way you are.
          Signature
          Long time Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. Click here to help her out: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11318304].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
            Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

            There's nothing like spending your time productively, eh.

            Thank you for summing up in a nutshell (that word was deliberately chosen) why you are the way you are.
            It's so cute when Aussies argue amongst themselves. It's like two cute koalas playfully wrestling in the Outback.
            Signature

            Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. You can help.
            Click Here: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11318330].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author tagiscom
              Originally Posted by Dan Riffle View Post

              It's so cute when Aussies argue amongst themselves. It's like two cute koalas playfully wrestling in the Outback.
              Lol, yes, funny l see a lot of name calling and insults, here and elsewhere, but zero evidence to disprove this.

              But l guess that doing research on an official NASA site and NASA videos is all fake?

              It seems that some that are presently backed into a corner, and are seeing their lifetime belief fading away, are lashing out, a bit like a drowning man realizing that he has imaged the ocean.

              I think that it is always better to know the truth than to invest yourself into a lie.

              Since as l have shown, lies get disproven over time.

              Also funny that l originally wasn't going to post this here, but after a remark from a member, (for want of a better word) elsewhere, and almost here, (the mods here actually remove troll-bait posts) l decided to go ahead.

              So you can thank him/her/it for the motivation behind this thread!


              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11318378].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Claude Whitacre
                Originally Posted by tagiscom View Post

                Lol, yes, funny l see a lot of name calling and insults, here and elsewhere, but zero evidence to disprove this.

                But l guess that doing research on an official NASA site and NASA videos is all fake?

                It seems that some that are presently backed into a corner, and are seeing their lifetime belief fading away, are lashing out, a bit like a drowning man realizing that he has imaged the ocean.

                I think that it is always better to know the truth than to invest yourself into a lie.

                Since as l have shown, lies get disproven over time.

                Also funny that l originally wasn't going to post this here, but after a remark from a member, (for want of a better word) elsewhere, and almost here, (the mods here actually remove troll-bait posts) l decided to go ahead.

                So you can thank him/her/it for the motivation behind this thread!


                Honestly, Shane....it isn't even your ideas that make people not take you seriously. It's your completely unwarranted attitude of superiority (that your post here demonstrates) that brings insults.
                Signature

                Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. You can help.
                Click Here: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11318710].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
              Originally Posted by Dan Riffle View Post

              It's so cute when Aussies argue amongst themselves.
              Not nearly as much fun as a Sumo wannabe wrestling with a garden gnome.
              Signature
              Long time Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. Click here to help her out: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11318595].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
    Signature
    "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317434].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author tagiscom
      [quote=Jonathan 2.0;11317434
      Be good.
      : )[/quote]

      Nah, that one is fake!



      Ok, just so we don't go down the video camera the astronauts in later missions used could have spotted one of the panels 11,000k's away here is a test.


      This was in 1972, or as modern as was possible, and you will note that one of the astronauts says that we are 1,500 feet up.

      1,500 feet is .45 of a km up, and it is a blurry dot, true the camera may have not autofocused, but a dot at half a km.

      The LM was a few hundred feet away from the one on the moon, so this video camera probably has a 30km range.

      And looking at this footage the UFO was probably 1000 feet away from the CM, or pretty close.

      I discussed this at great length on another forum, and had to put up with a few that couldn't handle it.

      You can always tell when you get to a skeptic, they start to call you names, that or bring up pre-school evidence.

      But the evidence speaks for itself, and name calling won't change evidence.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317437].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    Notice that there's absolutely no debate about the authenticity of the Buzz Lightyear video I posted?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317601].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author tagiscom
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      Notice that there's absolutely no debate about the authenticity of the Buzz Lightyear video I posted?
      No, that is authentic, l should know l have it on DVD.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317610].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author lanfear63
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      Notice that there's absolutely no debate about the authenticity of the Buzz Lightyear video I posted?
      I will challenge it and put to you that it was faked, all done with CGI.
      Signature

      Where ever you go, there you are.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317696].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ketan Pande
    Oh! the oldest topic of debate
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317613].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author OptedIn
      Originally Posted by Ketan Pande View Post

      Oh! the oldest topic of debate
      Obviously you're new, here. This is garden-variety insanity.

      Sorry. I had not, yet, had my morning coffee and was half-blind. Thought your post read, 'oddest' - not "oldest."
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317634].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DWolfe
      Originally Posted by Ketan Pande View Post

      Oh! the oldest topic of debate
      Actually you mean the oldest profession is the topic of debate
      Signature

      Long time Warrior HeySal is fighting for her life. Click here to help her out: https://www.gofundme.com/heysal

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317813].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317857].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author lanfear63
      Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

      Whitacre wobbles but he don't fall down.
      He has a low center of depravity
      Signature

      Where ever you go, there you are.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11317906].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11319521].message }}

Trending Topics