Obama's "civilian national security force"

16 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
The real purpose of Obama's "civilian national security force":

About that 'civilian national security force'
  • Profile picture of the author Mike Wright
    Whats the worry.

    In comparison, the all powerful and negligibly accountable
    shiny new Homeland Security has much to be feared.
    Wonder who pays their wages :rolleyes:
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[220672].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    The American public has far more to worry about from these people than from what you posted about.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[220697].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kurt
    Anyone that makes a statement like has no business writing a column:
    "We've seen programs like this before - in Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, Stalin's Soviet Union and Mao's China."

    Comparing Obama to Hitler, Mao and Stalin is BS. It's pure "opinion" and conjecture from the right and we never hear facts...Here's some facts:

    WTC - Happened on an all Rep. watch. BTW, Bush was 20% into his first term when 9-11 happened.

    Iraq - Cost us $1 trillion so far, and will end up costing us $3 trillion plus, by the time we pay for all our injured troops for the next 50 years.

    Not to mention 4,000 American lives and 1 million Iraqi lives...But what a million lives? Saddam Hussein killed about 300,000 over 30 years. We killed them at 15X that rate.

    Isn't going to war under false pretenses and million innocent lives lost enough?

    Katrina - Total incompetence that displays the rep. cronyism. "Good job Brownie"...The guy judged horse shows for goodness sakes.


    Let's see, that's our two most important commercial buildings, a city and a country destroyed when the GOP held the House Senate and Presidency.

    ...And, we still haven't caught Bin Laden, wasting time, money and troops in Iraq.

    Deficit - Bush and the reps. were given a surplus and traded it for record deficits and debt.

    Our Economy - It's a joke.

    Now, we all hear about "socialism"...The word for today is "totalitarian", which we will abbreviate as GOP. Here's why:


    Torture - We prosecuted Nazis at Nuremburg for water boarding, then we turn around and use it ourselves? This makes a mockery out of our GREATEST GENERATION that won WWII for us.

    Disobeying the Geneva Convention agreement.

    Suspension of Habeus Corpus - The right to see a judge. This isn't about "terrorist rights"...It's about making sure the person is really a terrorist. It is the most basic legal right a free country gives. It's been in use since the 1300's.

    Gitmo - AKA "goolag". Sure, there's some really bad people there that get what they deserve, but there's also been a couple of totally innocent people that have been tortured to an inch of their lives. The America I knew didn't do this.

    Patriot Act/Domestic spying - I thought it was "Give me liberty or give me death", not listen in on our military's sexy phone calls home to their loved ones.

    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

    The Bush doctrine - Says that we should strike first if there is "cause". This justified the Iraqui war. And sure, some will say if we struck first, WWII may not of happened...I say, had we struck first during the Cold War, the end of the World would have happened.

    Q. The biggest problem is, what if you strike first and you're wrong? Answer: Iraq.

    Striking first goes against logic and morals...Ever seen a court case involving a fight? The first question the judge asks is "Who threw the first punch?"..And that person is virtually always guilty.

    If no one throws a "first punch", there won't be a fight (or a war).

    If Obama is a socialist, the neocons are totalitarians, striping away our basic civil rights one by one in the name of "security".

    These issues aren't conjecture. This is the real (recent) history of the GOP.

    The saddest part is, none of these are conservative points of view. They aren't liberal, either. It's the neocon point of view.

    We can say Obama knows this person or that person, and spout nothing but opinions and pretend to be Nostradamus, but the facts of the GOP over the last 8 years are the facts. It's history vs. horoscopes.

    Because of Bush, the next president will inherit problems like no other president has faced, except Lincoln and FDR.
    Signature
    Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
    Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[220850].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Obama is a socialist. Period. If people haven't seen that yet from the programs and policies he pushes then they won't. What is even more incredible is that so many people in this country support socialism.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[220863].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kurt
        Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

        Obama is a socialist. Period. If people haven't seen that yet from the programs and policies he pushes then they won't. What is even more incredible is that so many people in this country support socialism.
        And McCain is a war mongering, totalitarian. Period. (And Ron Paul is a loser, according to democracy.)

        If "so many people in this country support" anything, then that's what we get. That's how a democracy works. Plus, we aren't supporting socialism, some of us support some socialistic programs in a democracy, which is our RIGHT in a democracy.
        Signature
        Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
        Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[220930].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author HeySal
          Kurt - the very fact we can call ourselves a democracy is ludicrous in the first place. How did we get to be a democracy? America is supposed to be a republic.
          Signature

          Sal
          When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
          Beyond the Path

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[220979].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Kurt
            Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

            Kurt - the very fact we can call ourselves a democracy is ludicrous in the first place. How did we get to be a democracy? America is supposed to be a republic.
            Nope, the terms democracy and republic are NOT exclusive. We were supposed to be a "representative democracy". Which is what we are.


            And here's some defintions of republic:

            A state or nation in which the supreme power rests in all the citizens entitled to vote. This power is exercised by representatives elected, directly or indirectly, by them and responsible to them.
            Definition for "Republic"

            -------------------------------
            A republic is a state or country that is not led by a hereditary monarch,[1][2] but in which the people (or at least a part of its people)[3] have impact on its government.[4][5] The word originates from the Latin term res publica, which literally translates as "public thing" or "public matter".

            The organization of republics can vary widely. The first section of this article gives an overview of the characteristics that distinguish different types of republics. The second section of the article gives some short profiles of the most influential republics by way of illustration. A more comprehensive list of republics appears in a separate article. The third section is about how republics are approached as state organizations in political science: in political theory and people governed.

            Republic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

            ------------------------------

            'Republic' As defined by Oxford American Dictionary:
            n. a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.
            Def. Republic

            'Republic' As defined by Webster's 3rd International Dictionary:
            n. 1. obs. Commonweal, state
            2. a (1) a government characterized by having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president
            (2) a political unit (as a nation or state) having such a form of government (the republic of England, Scotland, and Ireland under Oliver Cromwell ---E. E. Reynolds) (The Republics of South America have been the happy hunting ground of dictators. ---L. A. Mills) (the ancient Roman Republic)
            b(1) a government in supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law called Representative Democracy.
            (2) a political unit (as a nation or state) having such form of government (pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, to the Republic for which it stands ---Francis Bellamy) (the German people ... by creating a federal republic resting upon a democratic constitution ---US Code)
            c(1) a usually specified republican government of a political union (France's Republics are numbered ... consecutively ---Times Lit. Supp.) (the Fourth Republic)


            Def. Republic
            Signature
            Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
            Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221063].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Wright
            Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

            Kurt - the very fact we can call ourselves a democracy is ludicrous in the first place. How did we get to be a democracy? America is supposed to be a republic.
            Hi Sal ,

            Republic is just the alternative to a monarchy.

            Republics come in all flavours like N.Korea, Ireland or the Congo.
            Even the USSR was a republic.

            The big question is what system any republic operates under.
            The big danger in a republic is that only the democratic process
            can prevent presidents from becoming dictators wherever the
            system lies between extremes of communism and capitalism.
            Where democracy becomes corrupted .. a dictatorship results.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221096].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author KimW
          Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

          (And Ron Paul is a loser, according to democracy.)
          Huh?? I'm not following you here.
          Signature

          Read A Post.
          Subscribe to a Newsletter
          KimWinfrey.Com

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[220990].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ymon
        Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

        Obama is a socialist. Period. If people haven't seen that yet from the programs and policies he pushes then they won't. What is even more incredible is that so many people in this country support socialism.

        What is wrong with socialism? Capitalism brought only wars, poverty, immorality, pollution and corruption..
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221069].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ymon
    Don't forget Iran is a republic too!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221136].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Wright
      Originally Posted by ymon View Post

      Don't forget Iran is a republic too!
      The UK would have become one as well if we had let "President Blair"
      continue his agenda and methods .... including re-modelling our
      Parliament along US lines with a Senate ..the lot.

      If you must drag Iran into everything, the west funded the overthrow
      of the Sha's regime ....which resulted in the Iranian republic we now know.

      Physician heal thyself
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221306].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author KimW
        Originally Posted by Mike Wright View Post

        If you must drag Iran into everything, the west funded the overthrow
        of the Sha's regime ....which resulted in the Iranian republic we now know.
        I believe you have it backwards, the shah was being funded by the US,which is supposedly one of the many reasons why the Iranians hate us.
        Signature

        Read A Post.
        Subscribe to a Newsletter
        KimWinfrey.Com

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221375].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Mike Wright
          Originally Posted by KimW View Post

          I believe you have it backwards, the shah was being funded by the US,which is supposedly one of the many reasons why the Iranians hate us.
          You are quite correct Kim .... my bad

          from Wikipedia .....
          "
          The unpopularity of the Shah's regime: the perception that the Shah was beholden to - if not a puppet of - a non-Muslim Western power, (the United States),[22][23] whose culture was contaminating that of Iran's; that the Shah's regime was oppressive, corrupt, and extravagant.[24][25] "

          whole article at
          Iranian Revolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          Lol, must be election fatigue setting in ... time for dinner.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221400].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    It's ok, I will be so glad when the election is over, no matter who wins.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[221418].message }}

Trending Topics