Royal Wedding is going to have 2 BILLION viewers

74 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
I'm not a big fan of stuff like this, but I was blown away this morning when looking at the news.

According to multiple news sources, the royal wedding is expecting 2 BILLION viewers. Here's 1 of many news agencies claiming this figure: World's Media Gathers For Wedding Spectacle

If you look at Google News, you'll see hundreds of other news agencies are saying the same thing.

2 BILLION people watching a wedding.

Now according to Google, the population of earth is currently 6.7 billion people. Source: What is the population of earth

Now let's say that 1 billion people simply can't watch it (either they don't have a TV, or their government restricts it, or they are isolated from the media, or they live in poverty). I don't know what an exact number is, but I do know that 900 million people live in Africa and many of them are in extreme poverty, nevermind the rest of the world.

To be quite honest, I think 1 billion might be an underestimate. There are a lot of countries around the world living in extreme poverty, so I wouldn't be surprised if the number was much higher.

So we've got 5.7 billion people who could be watching the wedding. That means that 1 out of ever 3 people around the entire planet will be watching the wedding.

This is the largest audience in all of history.

Aside from the insane stats there, the marketer in me is looking at this and thinking - how much would a TV ad cost on something like this?

The SuperBowl (which is the largest annual show around the world) attracts 100 million viewers. TV ads range from $2 - $10 million for 30 seconds.

So if we use simple math, we could say that an ad at the wedding would run 20x that amount simply due to the scale. So we're looking at $40 - $200 million for a single 30 second commercial.

IMPORTANT: From what I've read it sounds like they have strict limitations on the TV networks running this, and they might not even be allowed to show ads. But regardless of that fact, keep going with what I'm asking below. For the purposes of my question, ignore the rules and assume they can run ads like they do with everything else.

Let's say you are a huge company and have a massive advertising budget. Would you be willing to blow $100 million to have a commercial played at this event with a prospective audience of 2 billion people seeing it?
  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
    I wouldn't get up at 4 in the morning to go to my own wedding - sure won't do it to watch someone else's. I think in the US most of us will watch the news videos about it later.

    kay
    Signature
    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
    ***
    One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
    what it is instead of what you think it should be.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3789692].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
      Well, I won't be one of them.

      Couldn't care less if I tried.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3789707].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
      Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

      I wouldn't get up at 4 in the morning to go to my own wedding - sure won't do it to watch someone else's. I think in the US most of us will watch the news videos about it later.

      kay
      I wouldn't be so sure.

      I think a lot of people will be watching it live.

      Ugh.

      I don't want to sound mean (I think it's great that the two are in love, and I truly hope they are happy together), but umm...didn't we have a little skirmish in the 18th Century that gave us the right NOT to care about this?

      The coverage of this has been sickening. Great. Mention it. No problem. But to devote this amount of attention to it is a festering bunch of nonsense.

      We are not royal subjects, but we're being subjected to the royals. I don't fault the soon-to-be happy couple though. Instead, I blame the out of touch media who don't have a clue.

      The good news is that I've found that there are a lot of good shows on cable at that time of day. CLICK!

      (I am very sincere in wishing them a life full of wedded bliss.)

      All the best,
      Michael
      Signature

      "Ich bin en fuego!"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3792804].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        no idea why anyone is interested in watching 2 people get married that they'll never meet.
        Because it's the closest thing people can get to being in a fairy tale, being a princess or meeting a prince. People love "love" - and love the pomp as well.

        At least for the last Royals wedding, people weren't all a-Twitter
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3793130].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Richard Tunnah
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          Because it's the closest thing people can get to being in a fairy tale, being a princess or meeting a prince. People love "love" - and love the pomp as well.

          At least for the last Royals wedding, people weren't all a-Twitter
          Watching Fox and CNN news today for a bit there does seem to be many Americans watching for that exact reason Kay. CNN were following folks having slumber parties and talking about the American dream...which made me chuckle but I guess they were just trying to say a similar thing to you!

          Rich
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3797931].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
        Banned
        Hi Michael.

        You're a good guy. However what you're saying is bordering on politics and is insulting to many people.
        Signature
        "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794724].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
          Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

          Hi Michael.

          You're a good guy. However what you're saying is bordering on politics and is insulting to many people.
          I understand that Jonathan, but try to see it from my point of view.

          I can understand it dominating the press in the UK, Canada, Australia, etc. But why so MUCH coverage here? It's just too much. We gained our independence over 200 years ago, yet our media acts like we are royal subjects. As I mentioned before, I don't fault the royal couple for all of the coverage, but rather the sycophantic media (and the sycophantic antics confound me).

          Some people here have made the argument that it's a "royal wedding, a fairy tale". Okay, great, but...I dare them to name ANY other royal wedding of the past 30 years. Why not cover the wedding of royals in other countries? Why not at least mention them? That's the other thing that bugs me.

          I'm not trying to be insulting of British subjects, not at all. But I do find it insulting that there is SO MUCH coverage about it here.

          What if you had near-endless coverage of a US president's child's wedding over there? Hours and hours, covering every little detail? Would you feel the same way I do? Would you be happy for the engaged couple, but also wonder why you can't get away from the coverage of a US wedding?

          Now, like I said, I truly hope they are happy together. I actually think their love story is quite nice and William and Kate both seem like really nice people. They make a lovely couple. I even saw the "royal kiss" this morning, and thought it was quite romantic. The two look like they are really in love and I wish them well.

          But, please, don't think I'm trying to be political and try to see it from my point of view.

          I join the rest of the world in congratulating you on the new couple.

          All the best,
          Michael
          Signature

          "Ich bin en fuego!"
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795500].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
            Banned
            When President Obama was elected, we all heard about it, and I thought it was cool.

            The problems with the UK and the USA are in the past. And, I would like to think that we’ve transcended all of that. I still like American’s (and your government) even though you completely wiped out the indigenous people of “your” country.

            Like I said, the past is the past.
            Signature
            "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795540].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
              Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

              When President Obama was elected, we all heard about it, and I thought it was cool.

              The problems with the UK and the USA are in the past. And, I would like to think that we've transcended all of that. I still like American's (and your government) even though you completely wiped out the indigenous people of "your" country. Like I said, the past is the past.
              It would be interesting to see how the coverage of both events compared. For example, the morning news shows here have been spending HOURS every morning discussing the minutest details. One of them even interviewed a gelatin mold designer. And they have been giving it this kind of coverage for the past month.

              Nice story? Worth a mention? Absolutely!

              Worth putting other news to the side? More important news? I don't think so.

              Seriously, I wouldn't have minded some coverage, but the lack of anything resembling perspective is downright silly.

              As for the past...I agree. My point is that we aren't British subjects, but our media is acting like we are (otherwise they would mention other royal weddings across the globe).

              I can also say the Europeans didn't quite "completely" wipe out the indigenous peoples that were here. I'm 1/16 Native American and relate to their plight on some level because of it. So, the "your" country comment makes sense, but doesn't apply to me entirely. (Not saying that to be rude or confrontational, but rather making an observation about me personally).

              For the record, I also like your country and would LOVE to visit. I have watched sessions of the House of Commons (I think that's the right one, apologies for my ignorance), and found the British political process to be rather interesting. I was transfixed by it for quite a while. And even though the process was very different, I noticed that there are far more similarities than differences.

              Anyway, I mean no harm, and have no hard feelings for anyone across the pond. It's our media that I have a problem with.

              I hope I'm clearing things up, but I also fear I'm just digging a deeper hole (but I really hope the latter is not the case).

              All the best,
              Michael
              Signature

              "Ich bin en fuego!"
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795626].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
                Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

                He didn't say that at all.
                I did, just not that directly. That was actually my bigger point.


                The coverage of this has been sickening...to devote this amount of attention to it is...nonsense.

                ...we're being subjected to the royals...[by the] out of touch media who don't have a clue.
                That wording is the intended crux of my orignal post in this thread.

                All the best,
                Michael
                Signature

                "Ich bin en fuego!"
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795658].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
                Banned
                Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

                I hope I'm clearing things up, but I also fear I'm just digging a deeper hole (but I really hope the latter is not the case).
                Nope. :-)

                You explained yourself well and I (kind of) understand where you're coming from. Sometimes people in these discussions aren't as diplomatic. So appreciate your "tact."

                Many people here in the UK feel the same as you feel about the Royal Wedding.

                Evolutionary speaking, we're only one foot out of the cave, so I'm not surprised there is many people who don't like the Wedding.
                Signature
                "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795709].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
                  Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

                  Nope. :-)
                  <snip>

                  Evolutionary speaking, we're only one foot out of the cave, so I'm not surprised there is many people who don't like the Wedding.
                  I guess that makes me a monkey-man, since the only thing that interests me about the royal wedding is other people's interest in it.
                  Signature

                  Project HERE.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795909].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
            Banned
            Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

            I'm not trying to be insulting of British subjects, not at all. But I do find it insulting that there is SO MUCH coverage about it here.l
            Hi again Michael.

            Surely if you truly like the marriage and the UK you wouldn't mind the coverage. I mean, what's so bad about two people getting hitched and are part of the monarch?
            Signature
            "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796234].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Christian Little
          Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

          Hi Michael.

          You're a good guy. However what you're saying is bordering on politics and is insulting to many people.
          Not it isn't Jonathan. All he said was he feels it's way overhyped, and I agree 100% with him.

          It would make sense if they were throwing it in your face in the UK, and I guess Australia since that's still technically an english settlement. But they are pushing this even everywhere.

          Is it important? Sure.

          Is it THAT important? Not really.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795520].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
            Banned
            Originally Posted by Christian Little View Post

            Not it isn't Jonathan. All he said was he feels it's way overhyped, and I agree 100% with him.
            He didn't say that at all.
            Signature
            "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795596].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author rondo
            [DELETED]
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796245].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
              Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

              Hi again Michael.

              Surely if you truly like the marriage and the UK you wouldn't mind the coverage. I mean, no one is forcing you to watch TV or anything.
              It's the AMOUNT of coverage.

              It's the AMOUNT of coverage.

              It's the AMOUNT of coverage.

              And why shouldn't I be able to watch the news to catch up with what's going on in the world? When the wedding coverage came on, I would change the channel (after a point)...only to find...MORE coverage of it. ANYWAY...IF you would actually READ my post, you would see I ALREADY mentioned I change the channel (hence the word "CLICK" in my first post).

              So, while I WAS being tactful, YOU now seem to not want to let it go.

              Think of me what you will. Make your veiled accusations.

              What YOU are saying is that I don't like the UK because our media is giving the royal wedding too much coverage? Give me a break.

              I don't know how I can be more direct. I have an issue with OUR media, not the people from the UK.

              If you still don't get it, I will be happy to try to explain again.

              Originally Posted by Christian Little View Post

              You'd be amazed at how many people think Canada is still a British colony. Even though we had this piece of paper called the Constitution Act a long time ago which declared our freedom from the brits.

              It's pretty minor trivia though, nobody really cares lol.Yes we have ties to the crown in the form of the Governer General or whatever that position is, but that's just a political figurehead.

              Is Australia still technically a colony? From what I recall it still is on paper even though it operates independently.
              @ Caleb, et. al. I'm not an idiot. I purposely chose the term "British subjects" because I didn't want to use the word "colony" (because I know better). My ignorance was in not knowing what the proper term was to describe what the actual ties to the UK still are, but I figured "British subjects" showed less of a tie than "colony".

              The point is that there IS some connection, even Caleb has said as much. Therefore, it would make sense for there to be MORE coverage in those countries.

              All the best,
              Michael
              Signature

              "Ich bin en fuego!"
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796297].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
                Banned
                Michael, I don't have anything against you. Never have. Never will. I just don't understand what the problem is. If it's the amount of coverage, then surely that's your problem. ("Your" meaning America.)
                Signature
                "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796335].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
                  Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

                  Michael, I don't have anything against you. Never have. Never will. I just don't understand what the problem is. If it's the amount of coverage, then surely that's your problem. ("Your" meaning America.)
                  It actually may not be "our" problem, but "my" problem, I admit that.

                  I think you could only understand it if you had as much coverage there (for a full month ahead of time) of a presidential son or daughter getting married. You may have some interest in it (just I have), wish the new couple well (as I continue to do), and may even like to hear a bit about it.

                  But at some point you would wonder why so much coverage is being given to a foreign wedding...ESPECIALLY when NO other (none, nada, zilch) country's state weddings ever get mentioned at all.

                  The funny thing is that I can't understand why you're not understanding my point of view.

                  It's okay though, you're a good guy. Just understand that I truly have nothing against the UK (or any other country for that matter).

                  All the best,
                  Michael
                  Signature

                  "Ich bin en fuego!"
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796375].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
                    Banned
                    Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

                    I think you could only understand it if you had as much coverage there (for a full month ahead of time) of a presidential son or daughter getting married. You may have some interest in it (just I have), wish the new couple well (as I continue to do), and may even like to hear a bit about it.

                    But at some point you would wonder why so much coverage is being given to a foreign wedding...ESPECIALLY when NO other (none, nada, zilch) country's state weddings ever get mentioned at all.

                    Well - I can't speak for everyone. But I honestly wouldn't care. (I should probably be more interested “politics" or whatever it's called.)

                    It’s kind of interesting because your observation echoes what many people here been saying here for a long time. At the end of the day I suppose we're just the pawns.
                    Signature
                    "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796400].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author askloz
    No way, i'd rather spend that on a bunch of hookers if i was forced to pay that amount - least i'd have some fun in the process
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3790146].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Levira
    2 million is definitely exaggerated.
    If people are willing to pay that money, it means they have calculated their ROI. After all, someone has to keep the advertising industry going, however ridiculous the ad charges may be.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3790372].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author askloz
      its not two million, its two BILLION, with a B.

      Originally Posted by Levira View Post

      2 million is definitely exaggerated.
      If people are willing to pay that money, it means they have calculated their ROI. After all, someone has to keep the advertising industry going, however ridiculous the ad charges may be.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3790426].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mediasurgeons
    It's not like if you buy an ad its going to be seen by 2 billion people. Each country will estimate different viewing figures and charge accordingly.

    The UK for example won't show any ads...

    I won't be watching anyway, no idea why anyone is interested in watching 2 people get married that they'll never meet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3790418].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sparckyz
    I can't think of anything i care less about the this lol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3790422].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mediasurgeons
    Yeah, two million is definitely not an over exaggeration. They'll be nearly that watching it down my road!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3790436].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
    It helps explain all the busybodies in the world. 2b is a LOT of peeps with nothing better to do...
    Signature
    Professional Googler
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3791758].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author AdamWagner
    My girlfriend just set up the DVR to record it, so we will watch it just not in real time.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794217].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author David Maschke
    When I was a boy, I got up early every day to do my paper-route, and happened to see the Diana/Charles wedding.

    I met my wife the day Diana died.

    Ya, I'm gonna watch it and I'm excited for our British friends.
    Signature

    I

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794265].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tryinhere
    ? first i have heard of any royal wedding ? news to me
    Signature
    | > Choosing to go off the grid for a while to focus on family, work and life in general. Have a great 2020 < |
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794331].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jimstoddard
    Well, for those interested, you could be watching it now, here:

    YouTube - TheRoyalChannel's Channel
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794486].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author 6lyrics
    I thing this is first time that any royal marriage on live cam that people see on TV LIVE.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794597].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author alina albert
    In my office every one is watching royal family
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794604].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paleochora
    Man. 'Jerusalem' was fantastic. Hairs on the neck rising. Tear in the eye and a lump in the throat.

    - I am a Royal subject. Proud to be.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794753].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author David Maschke
    Congratulations on your beautiful new princess!
    Signature

    I

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794894].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
    Living in a country that still respects the tradition of the Queen, a lot of fellow Canadians watched last nights wedding. In fact, some of my family, had a generator on their TV for that reason specifically.

    Caleb
    Signature

    Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3794930].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
    The Twitterstream coverage of the event was hilarious. Well worth following.
    Signature
    Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
    So that blind people can hate them as well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795017].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Diane S
      Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

      The Twitterstream coverage of the event was hilarious. Well worth following.
      10,000 tweets a minute is what I heard quoted as I watched the live coverage. My kids asked me to get them up early to watch. I see it as an educational opportunity. My son asked me why we are interested in this royal wedding, but not other royal weddings. Very astute observation coming from a nine year old.
      Signature
      KimW still needs our help DONATE DIRECTLY
      My First Kindle Book: Ten Days in the Land of Smile
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795537].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author David Maschke
        Originally Posted by Diane S View Post

        10,000 tweets a minute is what I heard quoted as I watched the live coverage. My kids asked me to get them up early to watch. I see it as an educational opportunity. My son asked me why we are interested in this royal wedding, but not other royal weddings. Very astute observation coming from a nine year old.
        That is a good question, and it deserves a good answer. Not that I can provide one though, but I will try.

        • We do not only share a common language, but a common culture, and that is a strong bond.
        • They have been our ally for many generations, and have supported us even when it was not helpful to them politically.
        • It is not a wedding of a political schmuck who will hold office for four to eight years, but this is a ROYAL wedding for two people who will ascend to the throne.
        • We may not see a wedding like this again in our lifetime.
        • It's a special occasion for our ally to shine, and shine they did.

        Dave
        Signature

        I

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796860].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
          Banned
          Originally Posted by David Maschke View Post

          That is a good question, and it deserves a good answer. Not that I can provide one though, but I will try.

          • We do not only share a common language, but a common culture, and that is a strong bond.
          • They have been our ally for many generations, and have supported us even when it was not helpful to them politically.
          • It is not a wedding of a political schmuck who will hold office for four to eight years, but this is a ROYAL wedding for two people who will ascend to the throne.
          • We may not see a wedding like this again in our lifetime.
          • It's a special occasion for our ally to shine, and shine they did.
          Dave
          Watching the ceremony now on YouTube. What a wonderful occasion. :-)
          Signature
          "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3797387].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author highave
    I never hared before, Also google showing front page.. any body describe me clearly
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795066].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author josephkevin
    It was amazing and spectacular event. I think more than 2 billions have watched it
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795746].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Christian Little
      Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

      He didn't say that at all.
      Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

      I did, just not that directly. That was actually my bigger point.

      That wording is the intended crux of my orignal post in this thread.

      All the best,
      Michael
      Jonathan - I highly recommend learning to read between the lines. It will prevent you from putting your foot in your mouth alot on the Internet

      Either way, I'm glad the wedding was nice. I sure as hell wasn't about to stay up to 2am my time just to watch it, but I'm sure there will be recaps of it playing all over all the networks for the next few weeks so I'll probably see bits of it.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795772].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Christian Little View Post

        Jonathan - I highly recommend learning to read between the lines. It will prevent you from putting your foot in your mouth alot on the Internet

        Either way, I'm glad the wedding was nice. I sure as hell wasn't about to stay up to 2am my time just to watch it, but I'm sure there will be recaps of it playing all over all the networks for the next few weeks so I'll probably see bits of it.
        (Haha) I didn't even watch it. (I'm simply not that interested.) However I know that to many people it's something important to them. So suppose I was speaking for them.

        I appreciate the advice, Christian. Let's see if I can't put my foot in my mouth for the rest of the day.
        Signature
        "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795808].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Christian Little
    Hey if you can stick your foot in your mouth for a whole day, that's news worthy. Carry a video camera around and show you interacting with people while a giant foot is in your mouth. Would be rather difficult considering 1 leg would be useless so you'll be hopping everywhere with a video camera in one hand lol

    OK...I really need coffee now lol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795873].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Christian Little View Post

      Hey if you can stick your foot in your mouth for a whole day, that's news worthy. Carry a video camera around and show you interacting with people while a giant foot is in your mouth. Would be rather difficult considering 1 leg would be useless so you'll be hopping everywhere with a video camera in one hand lol

      OK...I really need coffee now lol
      Instead of the Royal Wedding we're talking about me. (Haha.) Awesome.

      ;-)
      Signature
      "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795889].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Christian Little
        Originally Posted by Jonathan 2.0 View Post

        Instead of the Royal Wedding we're talking about me. (Haha.) Awesome.

        ;-)
        Shows you how strong my interest is in the wedding and royal family I'm more interested in the logistics and marketing aspect because of how big this has gotten lol
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795944].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
          Banned
          Originally Posted by Christian Little View Post

          Shows you how strong my interest is in the wedding and royal family I'm more interested in the logistics and marketing aspect because of how big this has gotten lol
          I still think it's cool for people which it means a lot too.
          Signature
          "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795958].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bravo75
    Simple solution:
    If you don't like it, don't watch it. Which is exactly what I done or didn't do.

    Sh.t, the older I get, the harder it is for me to string a decent sentence together.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3795912].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
    can understand it dominating the press in the UK, Canada, Australia, etc. But why so MUCH coverage here? It's just too much. We gained our independence over 200 years ago, yet our media acts like we are royal subjects. As I mentioned before, I don't fault the royal couple for all of the coverage, but rather the sycophantic media (and the sycophantic antics confound me).

    Some people here have made the argument that it's a "royal wedding, a fairy tale". Okay, great, but...I dare them to name ANY other royal wedding of the past 30 years. Why not cover the wedding of royals in other countries? Why not at least mention them? That's the other thing that bugs me.

    I'm not trying to be insulting of British subjects, not at all. But I do find it insulting that there is SO MUCH coverage about it here.
    We are not "British Subjects" and neither is the UK if you think about it. What power does a monarchy have in a democratically run Canada? Not much. It's all for the sake of a formality. So in the same way, Canada is like America, where we have a democratic system. The only difference is, for traditional reasons, we have kept some low ties to the monarchy.

    As a marketer, when you look at the amount of "press" that the wedding is getting, you have to understand. There is a HEAVY INTEREST from Americans (maybe not you) but their is, to watch the program. Now, when there is a hot topic, the easiest way to make more money, is to be a part of that topic. So that's why theres coverage, because theres a want... And thats what they're doing, filling the want.

    If you ran a news organization,w ould you ignore a big ceremony that everyone was talking about?
    Signature

    Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796122].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Christian Little
      Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

      We are not "British Subjects" and neither is the UK if you think about it. What power does a monarchy have in a democratically run Canada? Not much. It's all for the sake of a formality. So in the same way, Canada is like America, where we have a democratic system. The only difference is, for traditional reasons, we have kept some low ties to the monarchy.
      You'd be amazed at how many people think Canada is still a British colony. Even though we had this piece of paper called the Constitution Act a long time ago which declared our freedom from the brits.

      It's pretty minor trivia though, nobody really cares lol.Yes we have ties to the crown in the form of the Governer General or whatever that position is, but that's just a political figurehead.

      Is Australia still technically a colony? From what I recall it still is on paper even though it operates independently.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796236].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author rondo
        Originally Posted by Christian Little View Post


        Is Australia still technically a colony? From what I recall it still is on paper even though it operates independently.
        Australia and Canada are almost identical. Both are Constitutional Monarchies. The Queen is the Monarch, but the heads of state are technically our Governors General.

        While most think Australia became independant at Federation in 1900, the paperwork didn't really occur untill the Statute of Westminster 1931 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia came in (for Canada too).


        Andrew
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796319].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tryinhere
        Originally Posted by Christian Little View Post

        Is Australia still technically a colony? From what I recall it still is on paper even though it operates independently.
        a colony thats sounds funny, sounds like we still accept convict boats n all down in van demons land.

        There are some royal followers floating around oz, but most probably could not give a whippet. its an outdated tradition in many ways.

        That said glad for them and what they do and wish them well.
        Signature
        | > Choosing to go off the grid for a while to focus on family, work and life in general. Have a great 2020 < |
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796373].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
      Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

      If you ran a news organization,w ould you ignore a big ceremony that everyone was talking about?
      Of course not, BUT I also wouldn't have around-the-clock coverage for a full month ahead of time. I sure as heck wouldn't look at the tiniest detail - a gelatin mold maker!!!

      I think I see where some of the misunderstanding is coming from.

      This post was about the viewership of the ceremony, but I shifted that to include the news coverage leading up to the ceremony; which has been far too much for me.

      All the best,
      Michael
      Signature

      "Ich bin en fuego!"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796340].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
        Originally Posted by Michael Oksa View Post

        Of course not, BUT I also wouldn't have around-the-clock coverage for a full month ahead of time. I sure as heck wouldn't look at the tiniest detail - a gelatin mold maker!!!

        I think I see where some of the misunderstanding is coming from.

        This post was about the viewership of the ceremony, but I shifted that to include the news coverage leading up to the ceremony; which has been far too much for me.

        All the best,
        Michael
        Hey Michael,

        you know I'm not trying to argue with you.. I like you, and I've known you for quite a while.

        All I'm saying is, that there just trying to make money. HOWEVER, concentrating on one story is a little bit overboard, I have to admit. I'm not American, so I can't tell you about the level of coverage there, all I know is that it would seem to be a little too much for everyone to cover it.

        @ Caleb, et. al. I'm not an idiot. I purposely chose the term "British subjects" because I didn't want to use the word "colony" (because I know better). My ignorance was in not knowing what the proper term was to describe what the actual ties to the UK still are, but I figured "British subjects" showed less of a tie than "colony".

        The point is that there IS some connection, even Caleb has said as much. Therefore, it would make sense for there to be MORE coverage in those countries.
        Yes, I'm not sure of the coverage in Canada though. I've been left without power for the past 24 hours+, so I haven't been able to see the amount of coverage.

        Caleb
        Signature

        Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796408].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    The kid wanted to see it live so she woke me up and we tuned in about 15 minutes before the wedding ceremony.

    I have to hand it to you Brits.

    No one puts on a show like you folks.

    Harry's wedding will draw just as much coverage.

    I'll be visiting the UK for the first time in August 2011.

    Tally-Ho!



    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796353].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Oksa
    One more quick note:

    The parts of the celebration that I saw were quite impressive. I could tell that the people were happy, and that made me happy too.

    I liked the view of all the flags lining the street, and the throngs of people in front of the palace. The royal kiss on the balcony was really nice. I just celebrated my wedding anniversary 3 days ago, so it reminded me of my wedding day. Good stuff.

    All the best,
    Michael
    Signature

    "Ich bin en fuego!"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796386].message }}
  • I definitely wasn't one of the 2 billion
    Signature
    Reverse Engineering Faro, Romer, & MicroScribe
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796461].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ishakir
    2 billion is too much..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3796462].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Zero
    Mmm. Truely a wonderful occasion - and 1 that makes you feel all happy inside. Just what us Brits need to cheer us up and get our minds of the miserable economy and stuff going on all over the world.

    I'd have loved to have gone to see it - and see history in the making live, but oh well...maybe when Prince Harry ties the knot.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3797487].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
      Originally Posted by Zero View Post


      I'd have loved to have gone to see it - and see history in the making live, but oh well...maybe when Prince Harry ties the knot.
      James Hewit's son is engaged?
      Signature

      Project HERE.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3797566].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ExRat
        Hi,

        James Hewit's son is engaged?
        lol @ thunderbird.

        A great day for studying public displays of Stockholm syndrome, exemplified by a couple of Royal fans in London wearing 'thanks for the day off' t-shirts.

        Here's how the UK MSM are reporting other country's reactions.
        Signature


        Roger Davis

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3797626].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Paleochora
        Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

        James Hewit's son is engaged?
        LMFAO

        Must make the post up to 10 characters...is that enough? yes? Good.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3798585].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sunfyre7896
    This whole hyping up of the wedding is the most ludicrous thing I've ever seen. I know, people are hugely in to celebrities and who they are seeing or married to, and where they live, and where they just went on vacation, and what they just ate, how it was cooked, what time they get up and go to bed, what they plan to wear the next day, what time they go to the bathroom, and what they read in said bathroom. And that's just for a Monday. But to hype up a wedding so much in our collective minds for a prince of England that has no official power other than being a part of a royal line that only exists now in an honorary, and not official capacity. I know it's exciting for some, but to have 2 billion people just waiting in suspense like it's the Bachelor or something is extreme to say the least in my opinion. Now, the one thing I found interesting is that I heard there was some wagering to be done on the wedding with the best bet being that the princesses mom was going to show up at least one minute late and also that she would cry within a certain amount of time. Now that's the excitement I'm talking about. Wagering would be the only way I would derive any thrill out a of a royal wedding, but hey, I'm just one lonely voice out of 5 billion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3797885].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Sunfyre7896 View Post

      This whole hyping up of the wedding is the most ludicrous thing I've ever seen. I know, people are hugely in to celebrities and who they are seeing or married to, and where they live, and where they just went on vacation, and what they just ate, how it was cooked, what time they get up and go to bed, what they plan to wear the next day, what time they go to the bathroom, and what they read in said bathroom. And that's just for a Monday. But to hype up a wedding so much in our collective minds for a prince of England that has no official power other than being a part of a royal line that only exists now in an honorary, and not official capacity. I know it's exciting for some, but to have 2 billion people just waiting in suspense like it's the Bachelor or something is extreme to say the least in my opinion. Now, the one thing I found interesting is that I heard there was some wagering to be done on the wedding with the best bet being that the princesses mom was going to show up at least one minute late and also that she would cry within a certain amount of time. Now that's the excitement I'm talking about. Wagering would be the only way I would derive any thrill out a of a royal wedding, but hey, I'm just one lonely voice out of 5 billion.

      I thought the first kiss was amazing. (Really nice moment.) You could see that during some of the ceremony the Royal Couple were trying not to smile like they were probably instructed not to do.

      Thank you to everyone who has "supported" us in this important moment and enjoyed the marriage.
      Signature
      "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3800528].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TG12
        A great day for studying public displays of Stockholm syndrome, exemplified by a couple of Royal fans in London wearing 'thanks for the day off' t-shirts.
        Huh? Isnt Stockholm syndrome where you fall in love with your kidnapper? lol
        Signature
        Vaoser Link Ninja Software
        DHV Delivery Systems FAILING at online dating???
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3800545].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author jimbo13
        The reason why The Royal Wedding garners such interest is because it truly is a fairytale.

        Think about what a fairytale is. They are the ones from Hans Christiaan Anderson and the Brothers Grim, none of whom were British, but were all about Princesses and Princes and Castles and Palaces.

        What do you think DisneyWorld Castle is based on? Look up Neuschwanstein if you didn't.

        Most of Europe got rid of their monarchies or greatly slimmed them down. We still have the 4 things above plus we had an Empire that made Victoria Empress of 1/4 of the world.

        That spread the ideal of Kings and Queens being British.

        Let's be honest, nobody thinks of Swaziland or Cambodia as being in the same league. Whether right or wrong that is a fact.

        And to cap this one off, Kate Middleton really is the normal person. Her grandfather was a coal miner, her mother was an Air Stewardess and her childhood home was a semi detached house.

        Every girl on the planet really can imagine being her now.

        Dan
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3800605].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
          Originally Posted by jimbo13 View Post

          The reason why The Royal Wedding garners such interest is because it truly is a fairytale.<snip>
          When I come across such sentiments, it makes me feel like a heartless ogre to say anything sour about it. Why not feel good about it (especially since some UK tax money must have kicked in to foot the bill). Don't be too surprised by people in other countries being a little baffled by the maintaining of such an archaic tradition in the UK. I mean, even here in Canada with Queen Elizabeth on our money, I am baffled by it myself.
          Signature

          Project HERE.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3801490].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author ExRat
            Hi TG12,

            Huh? Isnt Stockholm syndrome where you fall in love with your kidnapper? lol
            Yep. The person who is enslaving you.
            Signature


            Roger Davis

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3802125].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author John Henderson
              Originally Posted by David Maschke View Post

              • It's a special occasion for our ally to shine, and shine they did.
              Thank you for that, David.

              Originally Posted by Zero View Post

              Mmm. Truely a wonderful occasion - and 1 that makes you feel all happy inside. Just what us Brits need to cheer us up and get our minds of the miserable economy and stuff going on all over the world.

              I'd have loved to have gone to see it - and see history in the making live, but oh well...maybe when Prince Harry ties the knot.
              I was having a drink with friends last night, and we all agreed that after watching so much of the country either outsourced or replaced by foreign competition, it was nice to discover something that the Brits can do like nobody else.

              Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

              James Hewit's son is engaged?
              Prince Harry had already had his first birthday before Diana met James Hewitt. If you take a look at pictures of Earl Spencer (Diana's brother) you'll see where Harry gets his red hair...

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3802250].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paleochora
    Worth putting other news to the side? More important news? I don't think so.

    Seriously, I wouldn't have minded some coverage, but the lack of anything resembling perspective is downright silly.
    Michael,

    I see your point and I agree with you. I do not understand why the American media is so preoccupied with our Royal family.

    Well, maybe I do and, being a savvy marketer yourself, you do too.

    It's the same reason why Diana, Princess of Wales still appears on the covers of trashy newspapers and magazines to this day.

    They (The British Royal Family) sell copy. Simple as that. Stick William & Kate on the front page of a magazine and the sales go up.

    Ditto TV viewers, I guess, as broadcasters are pretty loathed to waste valuable airtime.

    So. I understand why they do it. As to understanding why there is the demand in foreign lands for our Royals, I am not in a position to speculate.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3798570].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bummed.out
    The only impact it had on me was a couple hundred less Adsense visitors and a loss of about $10.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3801286].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
      Originally Posted by bummed.out View Post

      The only impact it had on me was a couple hundred less Adsense visitors and a loss of about $10.
      I don't know if there is any connection with the royal wedding but that day garnered a gain of over $US 300 for me (that's about $282 CAD ).
      Signature

      Project HERE.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3801448].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author wendyw17
    Well, I watched the royal wedding but it was already a replay since I am too busy doing and fixing my stuff when it was shown live on TV.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3809427].message }}

Trending Topics