hacker group "Anonymous" says they will take down ENTIRE internet March 31

80 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
BBC News - Viewpoint: How hackers could decapitate the internet

The jist is they say they are going to go after the top level DNS servers to do it.

---
Possible, but not plausible in my book, but i guess we will find out soon enough.
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    Damn!


    If they try, I hope they fail.

    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913964].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Frank Ayres
    it cant happen there is no way the entire internet can be taken down
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913970].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kenmichaels
      Originally Posted by Frank Ayres View Post

      it cant happen there is no way the entire internet can be taken down
      technically speaking, that is not true.

      but it would take a massive amount of collaboration and timing to do it.

      SO its not very likely. but these guys do have control over bots...

      and they have given warning ahead of time before, and followed through...

      so who knows...
      Signature

      Selling Ain't for Sissies!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914008].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
    Possible scenario:

    They succeed > Governments introduce more SPY laws to prevent these "actions".

    Sometimes I wonder if they are really the good guys...
    Signature
    People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5913989].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kenmichaels
      Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post


      Sometimes I wonder if they are really the good guys...
      damn good point. I know a lot of people are starting to ask that same question.
      Signature

      Selling Ain't for Sissies!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5914025].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TG12
        Basically, you'd have to take out the root nameservers (the ones that have addresses for the .com, .uk, .net Top Level Domain servers), and you'd have to keep them down longer than their TTLs (Time To Live) which at which time sub-domain and caching servers would refresh and break. Even so, not all cachers would bother refreshing immediatly after the TTL expires, and chances are there will be multiple redundant lines you'd need to clog up as well.

        TL;DR, there is still a dependency on nameservers further up the DNS hierarchy, but good luck.
        Signature
        Vaoser Link Ninja Software
        DHV Delivery Systems FAILING at online dating???
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915300].message }}
        • Originally Posted by TG12 View Post

          Basically, you'd have to take out the root nameservers (the ones that have addresses for the .com, .uk, .net Top Level Domain servers), and you'd have to keep them down longer than their TTLs (Time To Live) which at which time sub-domain and caching servers would refresh and break. Even so, not all cachers would bother refreshing immediatly after the TTL expires, and chances are there will be multiple redundant lines you'd need to clog up as well.

          TL;DR, there is still a dependency on nameservers further up the DNS hierarchy, but good luck.
          Originally Posted by jacktackett
          The Internet is not a single network - its a network of networks. True in 2003 there were only about 40,000 BGP routes required - but that's still a lot of routers. DNS is a hierarchical system - so the crackers would have to take out ALL name servers in order to bring down the entire Public internet. Plus after taking down all DNS servers, they would have to truncate all the /etc/hosts file on all client machines. Impossible? I'm old enough to know better than to say that - but probable? by just hacking the root name servers? doubtful.
          Good point!
          Are you two chaps busy on Saturday? Want to come to a party? It's BYOBGP
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917780].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LarryC
    I don't see why they'd want to do that, as that's their main method of communication -or maybe their only method. Remember, anyone can make a post or video and call themselves Anonymous. It's not clear how cohesive a group it is.

    They supposedly threatened to take down Facebook a few months ago. Last November 5 was supposed to be a huge event, and nothing. So, whether you like them or not, I wouldn't expect too much.
    Signature
    Content Writing, Ghostwriting, eBooks, editing, research.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915363].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Robert Michael
      They supposedly threatened to take down Facebook a few months ago. Last November 5 was supposed to be a huge event, and nothing. So, whether you like them or not, I wouldn't expect too much.
      They decided not to since thats how OCCUPY groups were contacting each other & organizing their dates/times/locations & all that good stuff.

      However I wouldnt be too worried about them taking down the entire internet. Without the internet, there is no Anonymous. lol they would be putting themselves out of 'business'
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915982].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author cashtree
        Originally Posted by Whos That Guru View Post

        They decided not to since thats how OCCUPY groups were contacting each other & organizing their dates/times/locations & all that good stuff.

        However I wouldnt be too worried about them taking down the entire internet. Without the internet, there is no Anonymous. lol they would be putting themselves out of 'business'
        DNS isn't the entire internet anyway, it's just domain to IP(s) resolution, you can visit sites, connect to other servers etc...without a domain. But like I said above they won't succeed in shutting down DNS regardless.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915993].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by Whos That Guru View Post

        They decided not to since thats how OCCUPY groups were contacting each other & organizing their dates/times/locations & all that good stuff.

        However I wouldnt be too worried about them taking down the entire internet. Without the internet, there is no Anonymous. lol they would be putting themselves out of 'business'

        Ah but we don't know that do we? They may just be Minute Men 2000. The Internet display might just be some show and spangle for whatever they really are. I like to believe in Heroes. Not sure that will be these guys or not. Their ability to mess with gov sites is pretty impressive - but who's side are the on? Free people or are they after the power themselves?
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5918807].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

          Ah but we don't know that do we? They may just be Minute Men 2000. The Internet display might just be some show and spangle for whatever they really are. I like to believe in Heroes. Not sure that will be these guys or not. Their ability to mess with gov sites is pretty impressive - but who's side are the on? Free people or are they after the power themselves?
          They're KOOKS! They jump to conclusions, are often on the wrong side, etc... When they ARE on the right side, their statements carry no weight.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919148].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author HeySal
            Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

            They're KOOKS! They jump to conclusions, are often on the wrong side, etc... When they ARE on the right side, their statements carry no weight.

            Steve
            I agree, they are kooks. My last post was partially tongue-in-cheek. I would, however, like a complete statement from them about what their ultimate philosophy and motives are.

            Actually - I haven't seen any statements from Anonymous themselves to indicate that this is actually something they are planning to pull off or even attempt. The only thing I've seen is from others stating that is what Anonymous is planning. So it seems to be just a hoax at this point of time. I'm pretty sure if this was THEIR plan, they'd be saying so somewhere.

            We'll know tomorrow though, won't we? I just hope if it's not a hoax, they make their point, whatever it is, then back off fast and let us do our work (or play) without further interference.
            Signature

            Sal
            When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
            Beyond the Path

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5938654].message }}
  • If they could really do that, they should just take down all the 419 scam servers, then everyone would love them...

    A "Spam" virus...that automatically kills spam!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915412].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
    hacker group "Anonymous" says they will take down ENTIRE internet March 31


    Finally, a day off!
    Signature

    Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915436].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jacktackett
    The Internet is not a single network - its a network of networks. True in 2003 there were only about 40,000 BGP routes required - but that's still a lot of routers. DNS is a hierarchical system - so the crackers would have to take out ALL name servers in order to bring down the entire Public internet. Plus after taking down all DNS servers, they would have to truncate all the /etc/hosts file on all client machines. Impossible? I'm old enough to know better than to say that - but probable? by just hacking the root name servers? doubtful.
    Signature
    Let's get Tim the kidney he needs!HELP Tim
    Mega Monster WSO for KimW http://ow.ly/4JdHm


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915546].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Daniel Evans
      A mini 2012!

      That will keep people occupied for a while. Well for a couple of days at least...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915873].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TG12
      Originally Posted by jacktackett View Post

      The Internet is not a single network - its a network of networks. True in 2003 there were only about 40,000 BGP routes required - but that's still a lot of routers. DNS is a hierarchical system - so the crackers would have to take out ALL name servers in order to bring down the entire Public internet. Plus after taking down all DNS servers, they would have to truncate all the /etc/hosts file on all client machines. Impossible? I'm old enough to know better than to say that - but probable? by just hacking the root name servers? doubtful.
      Good point!
      Signature
      Vaoser Link Ninja Software
      DHV Delivery Systems FAILING at online dating???
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916878].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cashtree
    They clearly don't know how the internet works. Most the root servers are in the U.S and all of them copies besides 1...and that one is hidden. I'd imagine since 50% of the worlds inet traffic goes through VA where i'm sure a number of the root servers are, they'll need an extraordinary amount of bandwidth to do anything, which is good, I hope they fail. Is sad they feel the need to flood things for no reason. All they're going to do is strip away the freedoms we have online even further, because anything the Gov wants to justify removing something they can just use them as example as to why.

    BTW even if they take out a root server, like I said they're all copies anyway, and so are all the thousands of regular DNS servers that are around the world. So no they won't be shutting down the internet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915909].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
    March 31st is awfully close to April 1st. Know what I'm sayin'?
    Signature

    Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5915937].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author alistair
      Originally Posted by Dan Riffle View Post

      March 31st is awfully close to April 1st. Know what I'm sayin'?
      No, what are you sayin?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917360].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Daniel Evans
        He's suggesting it's an April fools prank.

        ....but then something would have to happen for that to be true and if it happened it wouldn't be a prank.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917443].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Dan Riffle
          Originally Posted by Daniel Evans View Post

          He's suggesting it's an April fools prank.

          ....but then something would have to happen for that to be true and if it happened it wouldn't be a prank.
          Not so fast. I didn't suggest it might be a *good* prank.

          They float the rumor, get the 'net in a tizzy and then...nothing happens.

          Or

          They actually have something in the works, but aren't sure it's possible. If it doesn't work, they pull the "April Fools!" card.

          I just find outlandish rumors + proximity to April Fools' Day = cause for skepticism.
          Signature

          Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5918490].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Robert Michael
    Yeah I know. Even if they do succeed, you can still type the IP of the website into the address bar & voila, you're connected.

    No need for the DNS if you already know where its directing you to.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916004].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Whos That Guru View Post

      Yeah I know. Even if they do succeed, you can still type the IP of the website into the address bar & voila, you're connected.

      No need for the DNS if you already know where its directing you to.
      Technically, for most websites, that isn't really legal. They ARE rationing IPs! So you would have to add the name to your hosts file.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919121].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author cashtree
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        Technically, for most websites, that isn't really legal. They ARE rationing IPs! So you would have to add the name to your hosts file.

        Steve
        What does the IPv4 exhaustion have to do with this? And not legal, what? it's absolutely legal to connect to any server via IP direct(that's legal to connect to, to begin with that is...) instead of resolving from DNS first, in fact in order for your browser to connect to a site when you type in a domain, it ask a DNS server for a IPv4 or IPv6 for that domain to connect to. So you're connecting to IP's regardless, DNS is just for the user, to help them remember addresses easier and for load balancing and a few other things, but in the end IP is *required*. So no it's not illegal and never will be.

        BTW most of you aren't on IPv6 yet but if you are you can reach Google via IPv6 at
        http://ipv6.google.com or http://[2001:4860:8009::68] Notice the bracket? they're needed for IPv6

        for IPv4 which everyone should be on can just do http://72.14.204.100 for google.com
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919335].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by cashtree View Post

          What does the IPv4 exhaustion have to do with this? And not legal, what? it's absolutely legal to connect to any server via IP direct(that's legal to connect to, to begin with that is...) instead of resolving from DNS first, in fact in order for your browser to connect to a site when you type in a domain, it ask a DNS server for a IPv4 or IPv6 for that domain to connect to. So you're connecting to IP's regardless, DNS is just for the user, to help them remember addresses easier and for load balancing and a few other things, but in the end IP is *required*. So no it's not illegal and never will be.
          https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four2353

          I know I have seen clearer rules but...

          things like:

          4.2.3.7. Registration

          ISPs are required to demonstrate efficient use of IP address space allocations by providing appropriate documentation, including but not limited to assignment histories, showing their efficient use.
          4.2.3.7.1. Reassignment Information

          Each IPv4 assignment containing a /29 or more addresses shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2. Reassignment registrations shall include each client's organizational information, except where specifically exempted by this policy.
          4.2.3.7.2.Assignments visible within 7 days

          All assignments shall be made visible as required in section 4.2.3.7.1 within seven calendar days of assignment.
          and

          4.1.7. RFC 2050

          ARIN takes guidance from allocation and assignment policies and procedures set forth in RFC 2050. These guidelines were developed to meet the needs of the larger Internet community in conserving scarce IPv4 address space and allowing continued use of existing Internet routing technologies.
          As for the IP thing? NOW we know you don't pay much attention, and have never setup a web server really. Ever hear of NAME RESOLUTION!?!?!?

          Virtual hosting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          Name-based

          Name-based virtual hosts use multiple host names for the same IP address.

          With web browsers that support HTTP/1.1 (as nearly all now do), upon connecting to a webserver, the browsers send the hostname from the address that the user typed into their browser's address bar along with the requested resource itself to the webserver. The server can use the Host header field to determine which web site (or virtual host), as well as page, to show the user. The browser specifies the address by setting the Host HTTP header with the host specified by the user. The Host header is required in all HTTP/1.1 requests.

          For instance, a server could be receiving requests for two domains, IANA — Example domains and IANA — Example domains, both of which resolve to the same IP address. For IANA — Example domains, the server would send the HTML file from the directory /var/www/user/Joe/site/, while requests for IANA — Example domains would make the server serve pages from /var/www/user/Mary/site/. Equally two subdomains of the same domain may be hosted together for example a blog server may host blog1.example.com and blog2.example.com

          The biggest issue with name based virtual hosting is that it is difficult to host multiple secure websites running SSL/TLS. Because the SSL/TLS handshake takes place before the expected hostname is sent to the server, the server doesn't know which certificate to present in the handshake. It is possible for a single certificate to cover multiple names either through the "subjectaltname" field or through wildcards but the practical application of this approach is limited by administrative considerations and by the matching rules for wildcards. There is an extension to TLS called Server Name Indication which presents the name at the start of the handshake but browser support for this extension is not yet wide enough for public sites to rely on it (in particular it is not supported by Internet explorer on Windows XP).

          Furthermore if the Domain Name System (DNS) is not properly functioning, it is difficult to access a virtually-hosted website even if the IP address is known. If the user tries to fall back to using the IP address to contact the system, as in http://10.23.45.67/, the web browser will send the IP address as the host name. Since the web server relies on the web browser client telling it what server name (vhost) to use, the server will respond with a default website--often not the site the user expects.
          BASICALLY, ARIN has asked all webhost users to conserve IP addresses and use named based resolution when possible. THAT is why hosts often ask WHY you need IP addresses, and why you can use an IP address to go to a website and end up with a different website, or none at all.

          BTW most of you aren't on IPv6 yet but if you are you can reach Google via IPv6 at
          http://ipv6.google.com or http://[2001:4860:8009::68] Notice the bracket? they're needed for IPv6

          for IPv4 which everyone should be on can just do Google for google.com
          IPv4 is still the standard. It will likely be a while before everyone is on it. A LOT of equipment isn't compatible. At least ipv6 is supposed to have enough IP addresses. But they ARE planning on using it for a lot of things. HEY, 4 billion once sounded like a LOT.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5920973].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TG12
        Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

        Technically, for most websites, that isn't really legal. They ARE rationing IPs! So you would have to add the name to your hosts file.

        Steve

        How the hell is typing an IP into the address bar Illegal?

        Ahhh of course they could announce their own BGP routes that would be cool and take out massive sections of the internet. I did hear that one of the members worked for a Tier 1 ISP so this could be done. What with OpenBGP and setting up your own BGP router you could effectively blackhole whole sections of the worlds internet traffic but it certainly cant be done by taking down the 13 or so Internet Name Servers.
        Signature
        Vaoser Link Ninja Software
        DHV Delivery Systems FAILING at online dating???
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5938340].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by TG12 View Post

          How the hell is typing an IP into the address bar Illegal?

          Ahhh of course they could announce their own BGP routes that would be cool and take out massive sections of the internet. I did hear that one of the members worked for a Tier 1 ISP so this could be done. What with OpenBGP and setting up your own BGP router you could effectively blackhole whole sections of the worlds internet traffic but it certainly cant be done by taking down the 13 or so Internet Name Servers.
          You can type ANYTHING into the address bar you want! I never said you couldn't! What I said is that you can't necessarily reach a site by giving the IP of that site because iana has said it is not legal to needlessly assign muliple IPs to the same machine! So MANY sites have the SAME IP address!!!!

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5952658].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Entrecon
    If they do, maybe I will get some work done around the house!
    Signature

    Visit My website http://kipferguson.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916011].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dmax Power
    A couple weeks ago somone was DDOS attacking namecheaps DNS server. There were a lot of web sites down due to that. Perhaps a test of concept?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916075].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author RiptideTempora
      Originally Posted by Dmax Power View Post

      A couple weeks ago somone was DDOS attacking namecheaps DNS server. There were a lot of web sites down due to that. Perhaps a test of concept?
      I've heard of testing and proofs of concept, but never a test of concept.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919918].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author NicheDad
    Am I the only one thinking about how much offline stuff I'd get done if this happened?
    Signature

    Discuss your favorite cancelled or ended TV shows in a fun friendly community.
    Check out this political debate forum.
    Also run an awesome community where you can get FREE Tech Support.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5916095].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lcombs
    I don't think it can be done.....yet.

    But, it's not as far-fetched as it may seem.
    With the advent of the 'cloud', it could happen.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917319].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Damn Mayan Prophecy!

    They predicted it all ends in 2012, the Mayans must have been predicting the end of the internet!

    It's already in motion people, the end is near, gather your laptops & run for the hills!


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5917804].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bailbondsguys
    Can they reschedule it to Friday instead of Saturday? XD
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5918190].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fallen_Angel
    Its not possible. Anonymous uses ddos attacks. Not enough bots to shut down internet.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5918210].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author fbwealthsystem
    Lol...the whole idea and formation of the internet was to create a communication system of networks routed through thousands of possible paths that communication would withstand a a nuclear war...

    The internet is by definition impossible to stop...the internet routes data by whatever path is available...the person would have to remove each and every path (millions of paths) to do this...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919187].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RiptideTempora
    I call bull****. No mention of this on @YourAnonNews, @AnonymousIRC, @LulzKitten, @AnonyOps, @AnonOps, etc.

    No ominous mysterious hashtags either.

    You are being trolled.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919764].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JustVisiting
    Might as well spend that day at the beach then.
    Signature
    "...If at first you don't succeed; call it Version 1.0"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919862].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Traffic Master
    Banned
    Next minute: Internet goes back up 1 second after.
    Problem solved?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5919974].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ernie Lo
    Wouldnt surprise me if Anonymous is a government alias and they are doing this so they can then clamp down and take more control of the internet..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5920065].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author The A
    when I heard about them taking down FBI website, i was so damn happy because after that happened the ridiculous SOPA was put off. now they want to take down the internet. WTH!!! what's their really intention?
    Signature
    "And all what's left is nothing but a bunch of weeping competitors..."
    Read more >>>
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5920211].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author scottsdaleins
    I have no idea where that article came from (or what forums the author is browsing), I don't even see it being mentioned on AnonOps (anon's twitter) at all. And Anonymous has denied their desire to hack facebook many times already, which was a false rumor. There is no reason for them to take down the whole internet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5922059].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jeremy_AM
      Originally Posted by scottsdaleins View Post

      I have no idea where that article came from (or what forums the author is browsing), I don't even see it being mentioned on AnonOps (anon's twitter) at all. And Anonymous has denied their desire to hack facebook many times already, which was a false rumor. There is no reason for them to take down the whole internet.
      The news media just likes to run with a story anytime someone says something and claims to be from Anonymous. Anyone and everyone can claim Anonymous but if it's not on the main Twitter account, where they actually do announce and carry out major attacks, then it's mostly BS. The news outlets know this but they don't care as long as people go read their stories.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5924201].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jonathan 2.0
    Banned
    Sure it's not an April Fools' joke?
    Signature
    "Each problem has hidden in it an opportunity so powerful that it literally dwarfs the problem. The greatest success stories were created by people who recognized a problem and turned it into an opportunity."―Joseph Sugarman
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5924420].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jun Balona
    Coincidentally, March 31 is also Earth Hour.

    An excerpt from worldwildlife.org:

    Participate in the world’s largest single campaign for the planet: Earth Hour. It starts by turning off your lights for an hour at 8:30 pm on March 31, 2012 in a collective display of commitment to a better future for the planet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5937713].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    I wish these megalomaniac, terrorist THUGS would all drop stone cold dead on March 31.

    This would be a major improvement to the planet if they were not part of it.

    Alternative very long prison sentences would work too, except we would have to feed them.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5938565].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author scottsdaleins
    They are not taking the internet down and denying any truth to "operationblackout" from Anon's twitter (from mashable, they sum it up) http://mashable.com/2012/03/30/anony...tion-blackout/
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5939023].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kenmichaels
      Originally Posted by scottsdaleins View Post

      They are not taking the internet down and denying any truth to "operationblackout" from Anon's twitter (from mashable, they sum it up) http://mashable.com/2012/03/30/anony...tion-blackout/
      that's too bad, i know a bunch of us were looking forward to a day off

      thanks for that link scott
      Signature

      Selling Ain't for Sissies!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5939185].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by kenmichaels View Post

        that's too bad, i know a bunch of us were looking forward to a day off

        thanks for that link scott
        So whatever happened to the idea that working online gives you the freedom to take some time off whenever you please? Take the day off - it's Saturday for cripes sakes.
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5939338].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author kenmichaels
          Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

          So whatever happened to the idea that working online gives you the freedom to take some time off whenever you please? Take the day off - it's Saturday for cripes sakes.
          thats never quite worked out for me. As a matter of fact, it seems if i just "think" about taking some time off, some huge crisis hits and it has to be dealt with.
          Signature

          Selling Ain't for Sissies!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5939402].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Robert Michael
          Well the internet is still up (big surprise)

          However my laptop (that I JUST bought brand new 3 months ago) is screwed up. The video card is going out. WTF man....

          Then they want me to pay for the shipping?!! No other company makes you pay for shipping when you're under warranty. NOPE. JUST TOSHIBA. This month has just been ridiculously horrible.

          COME ON UNIVERSE, YOU HAVE 12 HOURS LEFT TO MESS UP SOMETHING ELSE, BETTER GET TO IT, WE DONT WANT ROB TO BE ANYWHERE NEAR HAPPY FOR THE REST OF MARCH!

          Nope. That is too much to ask for.

          Im extremely pissed.........
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944873].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author KimW
            Originally Posted by Whos That Guru View Post

            Well the internet is still up (big surprise)

            However my laptop (that I JUST bought brand new 3 months ago) is screwed up. The video card is going out. WTF man....

            Then they want me to pay for the shipping?!! No other company makes you pay for shipping when you're under warranty. NOPE. JUST TOSHIBA. This month has just been ridiculously horrible.

            COME ON UNIVERSE, YOU HAVE 12 HOURS LEFT TO MESS UP SOMETHING ELSE, BETTER GET TO IT, WE DONT WANT ROB TO BE ANYWHERE NEAR HAPPY FOR THE REST OF MARCH!

            Nope. That is too much to ask for.

            Im extremely pissed.........
            Actually, most companies nowadays make you pay for shipping something back even when under warranty.

            I just had a horrendus experience with Newegg. I needed a new ide hard drive and all they had were refurbs. Not a problem I thought,while there were no refunds they would exchange if there was a problem.
            I also purchased a 3 year warranty ( I don't normally buy those,but I had a specific reason this time).
            Any way,the HD arrived DOA. I had to return it,and I had to pay the return postage.(I told you almost all companies require you pay to return nowadays).
            I get a replacemnt drive and it was DOA too. Of course they wanted me to return it again,and again for me to pay the postage.
            I blew my stack. The hard drive was only $50. I had already spent another $15 for packaing and return postage,and now they wanted me to pay another $15.
            No Way.
            I emailed them and explained that since they have been in business I have spent literally thousands of dollars with their business,and I am not paying the return postage and I do not want another hard drive sent to me. I want a full refund.
            After a lot of going back and forth, the ended up refunding me my postage and the cost of the refurb hard drive, but they weren't going to refund the $16 for the extended warranty!!
            Again, after much back and forth I managed to get that back too,but it took a lot of time and effort and persistence to do it.
            Signature

            Read A Post.
            Subscribe to a Newsletter
            KimWinfrey.Com

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5945882].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by Whos That Guru View Post

            Well the internet is still up (big surprise)
            HOW do you know? I am on EAST COAST time, in the US, and it is 7:57! So they have about another 4 hours! PT gives them SEVEN hours!
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5947107].message }}
    • Originally Posted by scottsdaleins View Post

      They are not taking the internet down and denying any truth to "operationblackout" from Anon's twitter (from mashable, they sum it up) http://mashable.com/2012/03/30/anony...tion-blackout/

      No, No...you folks are always getting what we say all mixed up! We are going to end the world next week!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944916].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Moneygeddon
    I can't see it happening - but it would be fun (as a social experiment) to see what happens!

    Teenagers who are addicted to tweeting will go mental!
    Electricty usage will totally drop off.
    People might actually go outside and socialise .. !
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5939618].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GT
    Re: hacker group "Anonymous" says they will take down ENTIRE internet March 31
    Just in case I can't contact anybody tomorrow and beyond, just want to say to everybody, "Have a great weekend and a nice life!"

    (And if you meet any of those cowardly "Anonymous" people who don't have enough belief in their cause to declare themselves publicly, kick them in the kneecap! lol)

    GT
    Signature

    * You Can Begin Earning Affiliate Income Here – Direct Commissions and Residual Income!
    * Home Business Resources and Affiliate Opportunities
    * Visit This Library to Expand Your Knowledge – Blog Post
    * Reinventing Your Life - Make the Rest of Your Life the BEST of Your Life!
    * Follow Me On Twitter ===> MyPowerSite <===| gtbulmer | StarrBizzcom

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5940811].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seotothecore
    did you know anonymous can be anyone? there can be multiple hacker groups named anonymous guys
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5940932].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      They lied.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944291].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dave Patterson
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        They lied.
        *feeling self* (No, not THERE!)

        OK....I'm still here!
        Signature
        Professional Googler
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944316].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ThomM
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        They lied.
        Holy batman, crap.
        This guy was right
        Signature

        Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
        Getting old ain't for sissy's
        As you are I was, as I am you will be
        You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5952689].message }}
    • Originally Posted by seotothecore View Post

      did you know anonymous can be anyone? there can be multiple hacker groups named anonymous guys
      That's kind of why they go by "Anonymous"...hence the name. :rolleyes:
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5945806].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Patrician
        Quote:
        Originally Posted by seotothecore
        did you know anonymous can be anyone? there can be multiple hacker groups named anonymous guys

        Originally Posted by MoneyMagnetMagnate View Post

        That's kind of why they go by "Anonymous"...hence the name. :rolleyes:
        ROTFLMAO - hello? DUH? :rolleyes:

        Still hoping Anonymous THUGS everywhere will ALL Drop Dead March 31.

        oh well Maybe April FOOLS day.
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5945914].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    My internet is down. Luckily I can communicate telepathically with you all so it is causing no disruption at my end.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944321].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tradeking
    The day's not over yet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944336].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    My internet is down, I'm sending this message via my kitchen toaster, brb, toast is done...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944431].message }}
    • Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      My internet is down, I'm sending this message via my kitchen toaster, brb, toast is done...
      Is that one of those Flying toasters?

      Cause' that could come in real handy for breakfast in bed...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5944942].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GT
    Not quite noon. Still here.

    Will check later. News at 11.

    GT

    (Note to Kim: There may be "no disruption" at your "end" but if the Group does do something stupid, it could become a pain in all of our "ends.")
    Signature

    * You Can Begin Earning Affiliate Income Here – Direct Commissions and Residual Income!
    * Home Business Resources and Affiliate Opportunities
    * Visit This Library to Expand Your Knowledge – Blog Post
    * Reinventing Your Life - Make the Rest of Your Life the BEST of Your Life!
    * Follow Me On Twitter ===> MyPowerSite <===| gtbulmer | StarrBizzcom

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5945496].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
    Hello. Where is everyone? Hello. Hello-oooh?

    Dang, I guess they did it.
    Signature

    Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5945574].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
      Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill View Post

      Hello. Where is everyone? Hello. Hello-oooh?

      Dang, I guess they did it.

      nope
      you're coming through loud and clear...
      Signature
      ---------------
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5945755].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Robert Michael
    I dunno man.. I had to send my PS3 to Sony for service (it was out of warranty by like 2 months) and they STILL fixed it for free, AND paid for the shipping.

    My old GPS was recalled, they sent us a brand new one & just had us put the old one in the box & ship it back. The prepaid label was included.

    This is literally the first time I've been told I had to pay for shipping, when I'm still under warranty.

    What makes it even worse, its not even 3 months old. It was supposed to be BRAND NEW when I got it, not refurbished. So why am I having this problem in the first place?!

    I paid them 400 dollars for the laptop. 3 months later, video card is shot - Now they expect me to pay MORE money to get it working when it shouldn't have messed up in the first place?! Hell no man.

    Luckily I have her laptop that I can use in the mean time, but none of my stuff is on this one.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5946206].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Well my internet was down for several hours today. Um.....I shut my computer off and took my dog out.

    Everything looks normal now though.

    Ya think this is like that one guy's end of the world prophecies and since it didn't happen today, they will just move the date up a few weeks?
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5947590].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GT
    Well, it's a half hour to midnight here on Mountain time and except for the "downtime" I experienced similar to Sal (LOL), things have been fine here.

    But the way terrorists like "Anonymous" work is they keep you guessing and stressed and then strike when you least expect it. By the way, if their overall purpose and principles are so just and meaningful, why do they have to hide behind a false name?

    Anyway, I'm glad I still had the Internet today because I've been working on posting content.

    GT
    Signature

    * You Can Begin Earning Affiliate Income Here – Direct Commissions and Residual Income!
    * Home Business Resources and Affiliate Opportunities
    * Visit This Library to Expand Your Knowledge – Blog Post
    * Reinventing Your Life - Make the Rest of Your Life the BEST of Your Life!
    * Follow Me On Twitter ===> MyPowerSite <===| gtbulmer | StarrBizzcom

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5948364].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Well, it doesn't look like it hit the US, unless it hit about 2am to 6am EST!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5951834].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lcombs
    They shot and missed.
    It's now 5:12 EST and the 'net is still running.

    Maybe next year.

    No, wait!
    As of 12/21 there won't be a next year.
    Maybe that's the secret of the Mayan calender. That's how the world will end. They'll
    shut down the 'net on 12/21,
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5952390].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    This is my new reply for DOA forum threads.





    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5952698].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DaisySibyl
    Oh well, nothing happened. Time to move on
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5954823].message }}

Trending Topics