Renouncing citizenship is usually all about the Benjamins, say experts

95 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
There are hundreds of people every year who renounce their U.S. citizenship, but there is usually just one reason: Money.
Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin stands to potentially save hundreds of millions of dollars by giving up his citizenship, and according to an immigration attorney and expert on citizenship matters, saving on taxes - especially capital gains duties - is usually the reason people make the decision.
For Saverin, that means spending at least half his days in his native Brazil or Singapore, where he owns a home and which, incidentally, has zero tax on capital gains -- or investment income, like the estimated $4 billion he could make off of Facebook's initial public offering.
Renouncing citizenship is usually all about the Benjamins, say experts | Fox News

Joe Mobley
  • Profile picture of the author Halcyon
    To me renouncing my citizenship to save money is akin to divorcing my husband because he had bad breath. A bit of over kill,

    But I don't have the kind of money that these people have. If I did perhaps I too would look for creative ways to keep more of it. If the proposed taxes on the rich come to pass, I imagine that we will see a few more of our wealthy citizens jump ship.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6228730].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      I saw this early this morning.

      Eduardo Saverin, the billionaire co-founder of Facebook, renounced his U.S. citizenship before an initial public offering that values the social network in upward of $90 billion, a move that may reduce his tax bill.
      Saverin, 30, joins a growing number of people giving up U.S. citizenship, a move that can trim their tax liabilities in this country.
      Renouncing your citizenship well in advance of an IPO is "a very smart idea," from a tax standpoint, said Avi-Yonah. "Once it's public you can't fool around with the value."
      Facebook co-founder gives up U.S. citizenship

      Joe Mobley
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6228762].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Well, there ARE other reasons, *****ESPECIALLY***** now! In a way, EVERYONE already HAS given up their citizenshp because the US is so very different from what it was, and the US has given up so much sovereignty. So even if we haven't left the country, the country has left us.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6229256].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6260742].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      So people that leave California because of the high taxes and move to Texas are schmucks?

      People that leave Chicago because of political and financial considerations and move to Florida because of lower taxes and a better life for less money, they're schmucks?

      I' just trying to understand the reasoning behind your thinking.

      Joe Mobley


      Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6261119].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Brian John
        Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

        So people that leave California because of the high taxes and move to Texas are schmucks?

        People that leave Chicago because of political and financial considerations and move to Florida because of lower taxes and a better life for less money, they're schmucks?
        there's a huge difference between living in a certain part of the country because of a given lifestyle it affords, and denouncing one's citizenship just prior to making a windfall profit in order of getting out a paying their fair share of taxes. in particular, someone who came to this country for the protection it offered vs the country he left, having access to all the best we have to offer including attending one of our best schools, building an extremely successful business here (albeit slightly in an illegal fashion at times) that largely started from users attending other public institutions, milking all of the benefits he possible can, and then taking off just before having to give a little back...great guy.

        schmuck is a little more politically correct than how i might refer to someone like that. in any case, it's probably best he doesn't live here anyway, the less rats around, the better.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6261374].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Um............

    It's liberation money. It's pretty hard to give up citizenship without a stash. Are ya sure it's because of the money they leave instead of because of the money they finally can?

    And here's a knee slapper - there's a bill, which I am not sure the status of right now, that will allow our gov to take every freaking thing you own if you do renounce your citizenship. If you are someone who is planning to split after you get enough cash to do it - ya might wanna do some research on that bill and see what things are looking like real fast.

    *thinking...am I in the right forum? Is this the OT? I guess this is the forum we talk money in now, eh? Hope nobody ustairs finds that out.*
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6261429].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Brian John
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Are ya sure it's because of the money they leave instead of because of the money they finally can?
      enjoy reading ur postings, sal, always good stuff. completely get what ur saying and share ur sentiments on a lot of issues, particularly those relating to the country, but this guy is just a rat. he and his move from place to place, with no real allegiance, simply based on which way the wind is blowing at the time. yep, i agree our country is fk'd right now (and likely to get worse), but if ur gonna come here and use it for everything it's worth, pay ur fair share and then leave...and don't come back.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6261518].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post


      It's liberation money.
      More than you know.

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      It's pretty hard to give up citizenship without a stash.
      A stash is the fastest way to gain a new citizenship. However, it can be done by just moving to certain countries and have an income. That may take 3 to 5 years based on the country in question.

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      And here's a knee slapper - there's a bill, which I am not sure the status of right now, that will allow our gov to take every freaking thing you own if you do renounce your citizenship. If you are someone who is planning to split after you get enough cash to do it - ya might wanna do some research on that bill and see what things are looking like real fast.
      If we are thinking about the same thing, it is called the "exit tax" and is already in place. It mainly affects individuals with a net worth in excess of 2 million.

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      *thinking...am I in the right forum? Is this the OT? I guess this is the forum we talk money in now, eh? Hope nobody ustairs finds that out.*
      What forum would you recommend for this thread?

      Joe Mobley
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6261592].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author hardraysnight
        Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

        More than you know.

        A stash is the fastest way to gain a new citizenship. However, it can be done by just moving to certain countries and have an income. That may take 3 to 5 years based on the country in question.

        Joe Mobley
        never worked for kim dotcom

        new zealand embraced him but the fbi decided to invade new zealand sovereignty
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6265244].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Joe - income.....you better be able to find one in a land that you thoroughly understand and speak the language that predominates.

    I'm not talking about an exit tax.....I'm talking about seizure of all assets. I'll probably look it up again sometime and will give you a link to the bill/law whichever. Not sure if it was an executive order or bill either. I just read too much to remember details of everything. I just remember that I saw it and go dig it up again when it becomes relevant for me to do so.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6261670].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    There is ALSO a bill to allow the government to take ALL retirement funds! IRAS, 401ks, etc.... And did you know that if you leave the country with assets they consider worth $10,000 or more, without declaring it, that they may take EVERY PENNY? The word "may" means THEY can decide on a lesser "punishment". It does NOT lend doubt to the danger. It is ALREADY an established law. Look around the airport sometime. They often have signs saying it! Today, FACT is what would be considered FANTASY when I was a little kid! Just that $10,000 confiscation would have been laughed at.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6262386].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      No one really cares about this guy's patriotism - they just hate the idea of someone taking money that could go to the government. Of course, if it was their money....it might be different.

      He did this within the system - I don't have a problem with it. It's his life and money - not mine.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6263941].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Brian John
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        He did this within the system
        ...a system build largely on my tax dollar.
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        I don't have a problem with it. It's his life and money - not mine.
        i do. no problem if you want to come live and make money here, but pay your fair share and then leave.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6264191].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
          Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

          ...i do. no problem if you want to come live and make money here, but pay your fair share and then leave.
          He DID pay his 'fair share', according to current tax law.

          But some people don't think that it's enough, they think he has, or will get, more than he should. So now they want to change the rules.

          Why aren't the 'fairness' people crying about THAT? What's fair about having the rules changed in the middle of the game?
          Signature

          The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

          Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6265616].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
            Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

            He DID pay his 'fair share', according to current tax law.

            But some people don't think that it's enough, they think he has, or will get, more than he should. So now they want to change the rules.

            Why aren't the 'fairness' people crying about THAT? What's fair about having the rules changed in the middle of the game?

            That, in a nutshell, is why he's leaving, I am willing to bet. Interesting how the only ones really bothered by it are those who've been shouting "More taxes on the rich!" for the past couple of years

            Me - wouldn't leave. My whole family is here. More important than money...
            Signature

            Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6265946].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Kurt
              Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post

              That, in a nutshell, is why he's leaving, I am willing to bet. Interesting how the only ones really bothered by it are those who've been shouting "More taxes on the rich!" for the past couple of years

              Me - wouldn't leave. My whole family is here. More important than money...
              61% of the rich want their taxes raised.

              Millionaires Support Warren Buffett’s Tax on the Rich - The Wealth Report - WSJ

              And yes...Why wouldn't those that support higher taxes for the rich complain about this issue?

              I know...Going back to the tax structure the last time we had a SURPLUS to help pay off the deficit is such a bad idea. We know it worked, but so what, things are so much better now. :rolleyes:
              Signature
              Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
              Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6266228].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author MikeAmbrosio
                Originally Posted by Kurt View Post

                61% of the rich want their taxes raised.

                Millionaires Support Warren Buffett's Tax on the Rich - The Wealth Report - WSJ

                And yes...Why wouldn't those that support higher taxes for the rich complain about this issue?

                I know...Going back to the tax structure the last time we had a SURPLUS to help pay off the deficit is such a bad idea. We know it worked, but so what, things are so much better now. :rolleyes:
                Personally I could care less. I am NOT rich. I didn't state whether I agree with it or not. And I wasn't commenting about people complaining about higher taxes - just about this guy leaving.

                As for the rich paying more taxes, I didn't comment about that either. But why would that matter - you got your point out
                Signature

                Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6267045].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
              Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio View Post


              Me - wouldn't leave. My whole family is here. More important than money...
              Totally reasonable and respectable statement. I'm a big fan of looking at the options available for a given situation and making a decision that is best for you.

              If the situations change, reevaluate and make course corrections as needed.

              Joe Mobley
              Signature

              .

              Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6267116].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author HeySal
                Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                Totally reasonable and respectable statement. I'm a big fan of looking at the options available for a given situation and making a decision that is best for you.

                If the situations change, reevaluate and make course corrections as needed.

                Joe Mobley
                Exactly. Leaving a state isn't so big a deal - but leaving a whole country is something I will save if I find need of exile. I've lived overseas before so I am a tad familiar with the ins and the outs - but I'm not real sure where its any safer to go. I love this land - I love what it used to be anyway - and the actual physical land is phenomenal. I am out exploring every chance possible. I've lived a lifestyle that has allowed me to move when and where I've wanted to go and study the geology of the land itself - to experience the ecosystems, learn, absorb. I won't go unless I have to. If it gets to the point I'm not safe unless I leave - I'm not gonna be crying. I'm going to be one wickedly pissed off wench.
                Signature

                Sal
                When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
                Beyond the Path

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6267861].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author KimW
                  Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

                  Exactly. Leaving a state isn't so big a deal - but leaving a whole country is something I will save if I find need of exile. I've lived overseas before so I am a tad familiar with the ins and the outs - but I'm not real sure where its any safer to go. I love this land - I love what it used to be anyway - and the actual physical land is phenomenal. I am out exploring every chance possible. I've lived a lifestyle that has allowed me to move when and where I've wanted to go and study the geology of the land itself - to experience the ecosystems, learn, absorb. I won't go unless I have to. If it gets to the point I'm not safe unless I leave - I'm not gonna be crying. I'm going to be one wickedly pissed off wench.

                  I also love this country and the values it used to have and stand for.
                  I will continue to fight to get at least some of those back on track so my children's children will live in a place they don't have to either be ashamed of or fear.
                  Signature

                  Read A Post.
                  Subscribe to a Newsletter
                  KimWinfrey.Com

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6269494].message }}
                  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6272291].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                      Truth is, the number of people renouncing US citizenship has gone up drastically. Prior to 2008 the average was about 500-600/yr - last year it was over 1700 and this year 1900 predicted.

                      This guy was only a citizen for 12 years - so why all the attention on him and not on the other almost 2000 leaving annually? Because he has money and some think we deserve a bigger chunk of his money. Greed - that's all it is.

                      This story also helps promote the us against them, rich against poor, class warfare talking points, too.
                      Signature
                      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                      ***
                      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6273332].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                        Truth is, the number of people renouncing US citizenship has gone up drastically. Prior to 2008 the average was about 500-600/yr - last year it was over 1700 and this year 1900 predicted.

                        This guy was only a citizen for 12 years - so why all the attention on him and not on the other almost 2000 leaving annually? Because he has money and some think we deserve a bigger chunk of his money. Greed - that's all it is.

                        This story also helps promote the us against them, rich against poor, class warfare talking points, too.
                        Well, the idea of him coming here feeling it was better, or he would take advantage of something, and then leaving DOES make it WORSE!

                        But I HATE their reasoning about how his leaving NOW is an indication that he is doing it to limit his tax exposure!

                        ****IS**** he leaving because he will soon get a tax bill? MAYBE he is leaving because he is getting so much money! The IRS is planing on getting paid because he paid so much.

                        In the 1990s, for example, if I got a few million dollars, I would have left in a HEART BEAT! I STUDIED for it, LITERALLY! I knew where I wanted to live, etc... WHY would I leave? Because this place looked like it was about to blow up again. Why DIDN'T I? Because the place I was going to move to isn't as dumb as this place. I would have to show I wouldn't be a burden on them.

                        MAYBE this guy is planning on doing the same. BTW at this point, mabe if I were RICH, I would move to ireland or something. I COULD have become an irish citizen earlier for free, but failed to do so. 8-( Who knows. My older research is no good now. The past decade has hurt THEIR societies too.

                        Steve
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6277941].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Brian John
            Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

            He DID pay his 'fair share', according to current tax law.
            i get it, he paid his tax (exit tax as it's called), no surprise there, i always knew this. i never accused him of being a criminal, i said he was a rat, and still feel that way. i don't necessarily believe in the tax structure, but that's not the point. the point is that to live in this country we all agree to do so under certain guidelines, and many (not all obviously) follow at least to some degree an ethical or moral code. believe it or not some of us actually like living here and believe it can be a great place again, but not with people that renounce their citizenship to save money after they've made BILLIONS of dollars! he came and played the system solely to his benefit and now leaves to avoid paying what anyone else would be required to...R-A-T! furthermore, it has been eluded to that the only reason some of use find this disconcerting is because it's not our money or because he has more than us...that couldn't be further from the truth for me. personally, if i made some 3 billion in windfall profits as he did (or will very soon) i would have no problem paying the appropriate tax to stay in a country that i'm 4th generation in, that offered me and all of my family members and friends opportunities to receive a great education, such as to become doctors/lawyers/engineers, that many family members served in the military or fought in wars to preserve, that gave me a great place to grow up and raise a family. i wouldn't just jump ship to save some money, or for a klondike bar as someone put it, but hey, this saverin guy, what does he care, singapore will simply be the 3rd country thus far he and his wealthy family plays.

            the reality is that he did nothing legally wrong but (not that i really wanted to get into this) i feel the problem is with the law pertaining to this issue. i believe that if you live here and profit here, regardless if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else on profits you made while here. i can't say it any clearer than that.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6265948].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
              Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

              i get it, he paid his tax (exit tax as it's called), no surprise there, i always knew this. i never accused him of being a criminal, i said he was a rat, and still feel that way. i don't necessarily believe in the tax structure, but that's not the point. the point is that to live in this country we all agree to do so under certain guidelines, and many (not all obviously) follow at least to some degree an ethical or moral code. believe it or not some of us actually like living here and believe it can be a great place again, but not with people that renounce their citizenship to save money after they've made BILLIONS of dollars! he came and played the system solely to his benefit and now leaves to avoid paying what anyone else would be required to...R-A-T! furthermore, it has been eluded to that the only reason some of use find this disconcerting is because it's not our money or because he has more than us...that couldn't be further from the truth for me. personally, if i made some 3 billion in windfall profits as he did (or will very soon) i would have no problem paying the appropriate tax to stay in a country that i'm 4th generation in, that offered me and all of my family members and friends opportunities to receive a great education, such as to become doctors/lawyers/engineers, that many family members served in the military or fought in wars to preserve, that gave me a great place to grow up and raise a family. i wouldn't just jump ship to save some money, or for a klondike bar as someone put it, but hey, this saverin guy, what does he care, singapore will simply be the 3rd country thus far he and his wealthy family plays.

              the reality is that he did nothing legally wrong but (not that i really wanted to get into this) i feel the problem is with the law pertaining to this issue. i believe that if you live here and profit here, regardless if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else on profits you made while here. i can't say it any clearer than that.
              Brian, I get what you're saying, I really do...but it appears that you may be operating under a major misconception: that this guy is 'jumping ship' purely to avoid taxes. That doesn't appear to be the case if the timeline of his actions is carefully examined.

              What it looks like is the rules of the game are being changed after the fact, when someone somewhere realized how much this guy was going to profit when FB finally went public - which is more than a year after the date he filed the paperwork to renounce US citizenship.
              Signature

              The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

              Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6266374].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                I think Schumer is a fool with his new bill he's proposing. He would impose penalties on everyone who renounced citizenship in the past 10 years. What's he going to do - go to other countries and demand US payments? He says if people don't pay they won't be allowed in the US any more. So another retroactive punishment?

                It comes down to a political ploy and nothing more - and it's unworthy of this country to even consider ridiculous legislation like this.

                The Facebook guy did not shirk on taxes - he paid a LOT more than major corporations in this country before leaving. Who ARE we if we resort to passing retroactive bills in our search for ever more money to fill bottomless govt coffers?

                I think presenting such a bill is an embarrassment to the U.S.
                Signature
                Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                ***
                One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6266714].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
                  Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                  ...I think presenting such a bill is an embarrassment to the U.S.
                  Since when has that mattered to Schumer?
                  Signature

                  The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

                  Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6266857].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author HeySal
              Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

              i get it, he paid his tax (exit tax as it's called), no surprise there, i always knew this. i never accused him of being a criminal, i said he was a rat, and still feel that way. i don't necessarily believe in the tax structure, but that's not the point. the point is that to live in this country we all agree to do so under certain guidelines, and many (not all obviously) follow at least to some degree an ethical or moral code. believe it or not some of us actually like living here and believe it can be a great place again, but not with people that renounce their citizenship to save money after they've made BILLIONS of dollars! he came and played the system solely to his benefit and now leaves to avoid paying what anyone else would be required to...R-A-T! furthermore, it has been eluded to that the only reason some of use find this disconcerting is because it's not our money or because he has more than us...that couldn't be further from the truth for me. personally, if i made some 3 billion in windfall profits as he did (or will very soon) i would have no problem paying the appropriate tax to stay in a country that i'm 4th generation in, that offered me and all of my family members and friends opportunities to receive a great education, such as to become doctors/lawyers/engineers, that many family members served in the military or fought in wars to preserve, that gave me a great place to grow up and raise a family. i wouldn't just jump ship to save some money, or for a klondike bar as someone put it, but hey, this saverin guy, what does he care, singapore will simply be the 3rd country thus far he and his wealthy family plays.

              the reality is that he did nothing legally wrong but (not that i really wanted to get into this) i feel the problem is with the law pertaining to this issue. i believe that if you live here and profit here, regardless if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else on profits you made while here. i can't say it any clearer than that.

              This country is waist deep in fascism and it's getting worse every month -- there are a LOT of people who do NOT agree to live in a fascist state. What you are saying is they are scum for moving from a land that is no longer under the same form of gov they were born under and they don't like the new one.

              No matter HOW you feel about the guy - HE made the money - it's his, he's the one that worked for it. If he's paid taxes on it the gov has no right to put their paws on one more dime just because he's fed up. Under our Constitution, they couldn't have done so. It's a travesty and just one more proof that the new regime is a fascist one.
              Signature

              Sal
              When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
              Beyond the Path

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6266929].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author John Durham
              Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

              i believe that if you live here and profit here, regardless if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else on profits you made while here. i can't say it any clearer than that.
              I have paid building owners who took my lot rent so to speak, but they didnt feel entitled to my business or profits.

              Everyone wants to contribute Im sure to help America, they just dont want to be raped for it in return and violated.

              Its nice to play santa clause and give from your heart out of your own free will, but its ugly to feel like you are seen as just a bag of gifts.

              I will pay you a reasonable rent, but if you start asking for millions of dollars my hard earned profits Im gonna find another building owner to lease from.

              Brian I think the key phrase in your quote is "As is anyone else".
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6278034].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Brian John
                Originally Posted by John Durham View Post

                Brian I think the key phrase in your quote is "As is anyone else".
                ...just as anyone else (in your tax bracket), was what i was suggesting.

                Originally Posted by John Durham View Post

                I will pay you a reasonable rent, but if you start asking for millions of dollars my hard earned profits Im gonna find another building owner to lease from.
                that's fine if you want to leave my building, but pay the rent you owe up to this point before you go, that's all i'm saying. nobody is making you stay, but don't think you can simply move out and not pay the full amount, regardless if you decided to stay somewhere else the last few weeks.

                once again, i believe that if you live here and profit here, irrespective of if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else (in your tax bracket) on profits you made while here. that seems so obvious to me, don't understand how it's such a hard concept for so many to understand.

                not referring to you john, but there's just so many complainers...america the terrible, boo-hoo, socialist america, bla bla bla. that's fine if someone doesn't like it, nobody is making them stay. if they want to leave, please, by all means. i simply don't think they should be allowed to do so without paying what anyone else in their financial position would have to that chooses not to leave.

                time for me to get out of this convo...i see it one way, others see it another, and that's how it is. my conservative brain has had about enough of this, lol.

                peace.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281594].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
                  Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

                  ...just as anyone else (in your tax bracket), was what i was suggesting.


                  that's fine if you want to leave my building, but pay the rent you owe up to this point before you go, that's all i'm saying. nobody is making you stay, but don't think you can simply move out and not pay the full amount, regardless if you decided to stay somewhere else the last few weeks.

                  once again, i believe that if you live here and profit here, irrespective of if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else (in your tax bracket) on profits you made while here. that seems so obvious to me, don't understand how it's such a hard concept for so many to understand.

                  not referring to you john, but there's just so many complainers...america the terrible, boo-hoo, socialist america, bla bla bla. that's fine if someone doesn't like it, nobody is making them stay. if they want to leave, please, by all means. i simply don't think they should be allowed to do so without paying what anyone else in their financial position would have to that chooses not to leave.

                  time for me to get out of this convo...i see it one way, others see it another, and that's how it is. my conservative brain has had about enough of this, lol.

                  peace.
                  He did pay the rent he owed.

                  How about this? If someone wants to go all the way down the democratic socialist road, they can move to Europa, instead of trying to turn the America most of us grew up in into the modern vision of Karl Marx. No one is stopping them.
                  Signature

                  The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

                  Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281772].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author John Durham
                  Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

                  .

                  not referring to you john, but there's just so many complainers...america the terrible, boo-hoo, socialist america, bla bla bla. that's fine if someone doesn't like it, nobody is making them stay. if they want to leave, please, by all means. i simply don't think they should be allowed to do so without paying what anyone else in their financial position would have to that chooses not to leave.


                  peace.
                  I use to be that patriotic too.... and so I understand your perspective and I didnt take it personal, but you may not understand mine. America is great until the first time it "b*** slaps you" and kills every idea you ever had about what it means to be an American. I would love to have patriotism, just like Mike Tysons ex wife would love to feel like he was her hero again.

                  As John (Global Pro) quoted the other day:

                  "Everybody has a plan... till they get punched in the mouth"- Mike Tyson

                  Well I had a plan to be an altruistic American forever....till America punched my family in the mouth. Long story, but its not all rosy and everybody wants good for the citizens.

                  But you may never see that unless you get sucker punched...better to stay under the radar because if you raise your head up America will rip it off with no conscious and call you "attrition".

                  Thats my experience. If you read my posts from two years ago I was in your shoes defending everything the government did and calling others complainers so Im not throwing stones, but sometimes you have to walk a mile in another mans shoes to understand their perspective.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281856].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                  Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

                  ...just as anyone else (in your tax bracket), was what i was suggesting.


                  that's fine if you want to leave my building, but pay the rent you owe up to this point before you go, that's all i'm saying. nobody is making you stay, but don't think you can simply move out and not pay the full amount, regardless if you decided to stay somewhere else the last few weeks.

                  once again, i believe that if you live here and profit here, irrespective of if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else (in your tax bracket) on profits you made while here. that seems so obvious to me, don't understand how it's such a hard concept for so many to understand.

                  not referring to you john, but there's just so many complainers...america the terrible, boo-hoo, socialist america, bla bla bla. that's fine if someone doesn't like it, nobody is making them stay. if they want to leave, please, by all means. i simply don't think they should be allowed to do so without paying what anyone else in their financial position would have to that chooses not to leave.

                  time for me to get out of this convo...i see it one way, others see it another, and that's how it is. my conservative brain has had about enough of this, lol.

                  peace.
                  MAN have you got this backwards! NOBODY is making YOU and your ilk stay! If you find a place like what you want, perhaps even russia, they will take you in, etc... They are changing SLOWLY as that system DOES NOT WORK, and trying to spread it EVERYWHERE!!!!! You SEE, NOTHING and NOBODY is forcing YOU to stay!

                  MEANWHILE, they and their ilk CHANGE places like the US. In the 1950s it was literally LAUGHED at when people said it would happen. TODAY, it is becoming more and more obvious that it is happening. If I went to a place like what I wanted, they would expect me to fend for myself, etc... and rightfuly so, as this country would steal my money effectively making me a SLAVE! Money is SUPPOSED to represent work, and have an appropriate value to that. WHAT is the difference between being FORCED to work for FREE and getting paid a TRILLION dollars for a job and having the government confiscate it? In BOTH cases, you are a SLAVE! BTW I use such a large value simply to illustrate the point clearly.

                  So many places have changed SO uch that I am no longer sure where I would move to. The SWISS FRANC is now a FIAT currency!!!!!!!!!!

                  Steve
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281982].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                  Banned
                  Originally Posted by Brian John View Post

                  that's fine if you want to leave my building, but pay the rent you owe up to this point before you go, that's all i'm saying. nobody is making you stay, but don't think you can simply move out and not pay the full amount, regardless if you decided to stay somewhere else the last few weeks.
                  He paid the rent he owed. He paid his taxes and he paid his exit fee. He did everything within US law. US needs to just get over the fact that they can't get it all.

                  I find it interesting that some Senators have gotten their little panties in a bunch over it and say ... he can never come back when they don't seem to mind cutting ridiculous tax breaks for America's wealthiest people, including a presidential candidate who has most of his wealth legally and conveniently placed offshore.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6299581].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        - they just hate the idea of someone taking money that could go to the government.
        Bingo!

        Also, SSDD. Same strategy, different day. If someone doesn't want to play the game the way someone else thinks they should, demonize them.

        That's just getting old and people are getting tired of it.

        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        He did this within the system - I don't have a problem with it. It's his life and money - not mine.
        Making sound financial decisions for you in your life is just smart.

        Joe Mobley
        Signature

        .

        Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6264301].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
    Schumer, et. al, to the rescue!

    Senators to Unveil the ‘Ex-Patriot Act’ to Respond to Facebook’s Saverin’s Tax ‘Scheme’ - ABC News

    Where would the U.S. be without folks like Chucky to stand up for the government's right to snatch people's money?

    In a statement, [Schumer spokesman] Casey said that actions such as Saverin’s are an insult to middle-class Americans. “We simply cannot allow the ultra-wealthy to write their own rules,” he said.
    It seems to me like this Saverin guy is following the rules. He paid the exit tax he owed. He filed the paperwork for renouncing citizenship more than a year ago, in January 2011. That was even before FB had announced plans to go public.
    Signature

    The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

    Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6264348].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      More to the point - let's get real.

      I don't think I know anyone who would not be willing to move if offered $60 million for changing country of residence.

      I know I'd be packing real quick...and so would most here.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6264761].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
        Are you kidding me? When I see some of the crap going on here, some days I'd leave for a Klondike bar. :rolleyes:

        Joe Mobley


        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        More to the point - let's get real.

        I don't think I know anyone who would not be willing to move if offered $60 million for changing country of residence.

        I know I'd be packing real quick...and so would most here.
        Signature

        .

        Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6264887].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    The problem is that our Gov seems to think it's ALL THEIRS. When you work to make that money - how is it that it all belongs to our gov?

    As this country moves toward fascism - it's going to act more and more like all fascist states.... one of those ways is to make it impossible for people to get out if they don't like it. Our gov is finding ways to seize every damned thing we own and they are using all tactics they can find to keep us unable to travel - gas prices, no fly lists, exit seizure, you name it. They want you broke and at home in front of your tv. It's so much easier to watch you that way.

    Welcome to America, where you are free to walk across the border to get in -- but you aren't getting out unless they SAY you can leave. Don't worry - you won't need new luggage for the trip out. You aren't going to own anything to take with you.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6264932].message }}
    • With 67 million Samolians, you can start your own country...call it Samolia!

      Oh, wait...they got one of those already...only they steal your money :rolleyes: Call it Saverinia...as in "look at all the samolians I just saverinied" -
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6265005].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Halcyon
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      ...
      As this country moves toward fascism - it's going to act more and more like all fascist states.... one of those ways is to make it impossible for people to get out if they don't like it. Our gov is finding ways to seize every damned thing we own and they are using all tactics they can find to keep us unable to travel - gas prices, no fly lists, exit seizure, you name it. ...

      I couldn't agree more. I think the most powerful weapon they have is their control of the media.

      People have been brainwashed into this silent loyal dog patriotism.

      Don't make waves, do as your told and follow the herd to the slaughter house like a good little sheep.

      When one of you steps out of line we'll publicly brow beat you so the others think twice about trying independent thought. Just pay up, shut up and enjoy your High fructose corn syrup...yum .
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6265230].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by Halcyon View Post

        I couldn't agree more. I think the most powerful weapon they have is their control of the media.

        People have been brainwashed into this silent loyal dog patriotism.

        Don't make waves, do as your told and follow the herd to the slaughter house like a good little sheep.

        When one of you steps out of line we'll publicly brow beat you so the others think twice about trying independent thought. Just pay up, shut up and enjoy your High fructose corn syrup...yum .
        That's not patriotism. Patriots protect their form of gov, not members of the gov that go rogue and decide constitutions don't matter. We've got so few actual patriots in the country anymore that it's scary. People sit and argue about this power monger or that one -- and they miss the whole point of patriotism.........which is to tell the whole lot of them -- "HEY, that's not constitutional, stop it right now or we start firing your asses."
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6266949].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

    What exactly is a fair share?
    If I can't have that kind of money, nobody else should be able to either therefor he should pay the majority of it in taxes to level the playing field so I can feel better about myself since it isn't fair that he has more money than I or anybody else. At least not that amount of money.

    -Chris
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6265121].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Personally I think he is an ungrateful SOB,but if what he did was legal, more power to him. Not the kind of person I want here anyway then.
    But I'm with Mike, no amount of money could make me leave my family.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6267101].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    $100,000 was once a LOT of money! You could buy a home, WITH a huge parcel of land, car, boat, AND a plane, and STILL have enough to retire in a nice lifestyle! $1,000,000 was once a lot of money! You could not only buy the above, but have a PALACE type home with tennis courts and horses, and you could have a country club and beach front property TO BOOT!!!!!!

    TODAY? My fathers modest home costs almost a million dollars, and he doesn't even have an acre of property! MY home is about the same in a less popular place, and his barely a half acre and costs almost $300K. Some estates near me have homes little better than mine, a little area for horses, and I BELIEVE about 2 acres. THEY START at over $750K! A place that is VERY nice, with about 20 acres near me sold for about $20Million.

    SO, for all those saying that "the rich" should pay their fair share.... You DO realize that YOU are almost certainly RICH by old standards, etc... HECK, I figure I need about $2 million to even THINK about retiring! As for the rich? If they REALLY want to pay so much in tax, WHY DON'T THEY? They often pay RICH people to AVOID paying taxes. Buffets deal with his son is SWEET! He can pay his son and get TONS of tax breaks. The obamas paid their kids a LOT of money classed as a gift. ALL TAX FREE!!!!!! I say the obamas, because mother and father acted like separate people to get DOUBLE the benefit.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6267115].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author KimW
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      $100,000 was once a LOT of money! You could buy a home, WITH a huge parcel of land, car, boat, AND a plane, and STILL have enough to retire in a nice lifestyle! $1,000,000 was once a lot of money! You could not only buy the above, but have a PALACE type home with tennis courts and horses, and you could have a country club and beach front property TO BOOT!!!!!!

      TODAY? My fathers modest home costs almost a million dollars, and he doesn't even have an acre of property! MY home is about the same in a less popular place, and his barely a half acre and costs almost $300K. Some estates near me have homes little better than mine, a little area for horses, and I BELIEVE about 2 acres. THEY START at over $750K! A place that is VERY nice, with about 20 acres near me sold for about $20Million.

      SO, for all those saying that "the rich" should pay their fair share.... You DO realize that YOU are almost certainly RICH by old standards, etc... HECK, I figure I need about $2 million to even THINK about retiring! As for the rich? If they REALLY want to pay so much in tax, WHY DON'T THEY? They often pay RICH people to AVOID paying taxes. Buffets deal with his son is SWEET! He can pay his son and get TONS of tax breaks. The obamas paid their kids a LOT of money classed as a gift. ALL TAX FREE!!!!!! I say the obamas, because mother and father acted like separate people to get DOUBLE the benefit.

      Steve
      Because its easy to say they want to when they don't have to,and therefore don't.
      Signature

      Read A Post.
      Subscribe to a Newsletter
      KimWinfrey.Com

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6267136].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
    All the talk about paying "their fair share" sickens me as an American and a believer in freedom.

    Any "share" other than a percentage equal to what every other citizen pays is nothing but Marxism. "From each according to their ability...[blah blah blah]." Taxation is government's yoke on the country's citizens, and a prime tool of despotic or tyrannical government.
    Signature

    The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

    Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6274025].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Durham
    Sorry. Deleted. This was a rant.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6274523].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      Geez, John - if you can't rant here - where can you rant?
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6275003].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Durham
    Thanks Kay, suffice it to say that as far as us being so privileged...when a man only punches his wife in the face squarely and not under the belt like "other" abusers, should she feel blessed to be with him , and should people tell her shes taking alot for granted if she is hurt and un happy?

    We dont believe in clitoral mutilation here.... We just sell our own peoples children for profit (CAPTA). When America stops preying on its own families I will gladly start sending my donations to uncle sam and taxes. I love to donate. They would get alot of money of mine if they were standing up for good causes.

    As for now I am building my OWN business and they arent helping me, I could take my little four by four space to india and work for all I care.... They dont need a BILLION dollars for lot rent unless they helped me build my business. Still its the fact that our tax dollars support local governments stealing children from families and selling them that makes me half tempted just to take mine and move to another country.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6275023].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    John, what do you mean "We just sell our own peoples children for profit".
    I understand what CAPTA is.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6275099].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      John -

      I agree - it's an odd society that shouts "for the children" all the time - and uses children as possessions, too.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6275156].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Durham
      Deleted again, hopefully you got a chance to read. Sorry Kim, Im very passionate about this and cant talk about it without ranting- then cant feel good walking away and leaving all those feelings out on a thread, its just alot of anguish.

      Im disappointed in our country as of late and I hope we are able to redeem ourselves from what we have become. Never have been into politics or been a social activist or anything... But lately....it all matters it seems and I am severely let down by my realizations about America in the last few years.

      Good is supposed to always win here.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6276029].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    once again, i believe that if you live here and profit here, irrespective of if you decide to move, you should be taxed just as anyone else (in your tax bracket) on profits you made while here. that seems so obvious to me, don't understand how it's such a hard concept for so many to understand.
    Everyone understands it is not right to SKIP on taxes -- it is that they have decided that it's okay to rake someone over the coals and take up to everything they own if they have decided that this gov has become too out of control to live under. It"s not THEIR money. The system they use to take it was installed on us illegally anyway. When they act like King George revisited.........it's time to go and if you worked to make that money, it should be yours to take with you. How much of your life and sweat are you obligated to give a government that is taking over so much that they are driving people into the streets hungry?
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281789].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    "How about this? If someone wants to go all the way down the democratic socialist road,"

    PUH LEEZE!!

    democratic and socialist do not belong in the same sentence,just as right wing and conservatives doesn't.

    True democrats are not for socialism.
    Most conservatives are not right wingers.

    Talk like that is counter productive to what we all should be doing, which is getting America back to the country it should be.

    By the way, my face has been punched by the government so many times it will never stop bleeding.

    Oh, I deleted 90% of what I wrote. It really isn't worth it.

    Crap, I just noticed that in the 90% I deleted I cut some I wanted left in,mainly this:
    I believe our country should have a flat tax,and that everyone should pay it.


    And Brian John,
    I agree with you.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281884].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      "How about this? If someone wants to go all the way down the democratic socialist road,"

      PUH LEEZE!!

      democratic and socialist do not belong in the same sentence,just as right wing and conservatives doesn't.

      True democrats are not for socialism.
      Most conservatives are not right wingers.

      Talk like that is counter productive to what we all should be doing, which is getting America back to the country it should be.

      By the way, my face has been punched by the government so many times it will never stop bleeding.

      Oh, I deleted 90% of what I wrote. It really isn't worth it.

      Crap, I just noticed that in the 90% I deleted I cut some I wanted left in,mainly this:
      I believe our country should have a flat tax,and that everyone should pay it.


      And Brian John,
      I agree with you.
      Kim, Democratic Socialism is a real thing - I wasn't mixing 'democracy' and 'socialism' for no reason, and I probably should have capitalized it in my remarks as it is a proper noun when used in this context. Maybe that would have made a difference in your perception of what I wrote.

      Democratic socialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Democratic socialism is a description used by various historians to describe the ideal of socialism in an established democracy.

      ...

      Democratic socialism is difficult to define, and groups of scholars have radically different definitions for the term. Some definitions simply refer to all forms of socialism that follow an electoral, reformist or evolutionary path to socialism, rather than a revolutionary one.
      I believe the above defines what is happening today - the U.S. is falling deeper and deeper into the socialist model, and it's being done 'democratically' rather than 'revolutionarily' (not even a word, but you get what I mean). A term that I think is interchangeable is 'statist' - those who believe that the state is, and should be, the final authority over everything.

      My family, too, has had a brush with the 'authorities' over a child. Outright lies, a fundamentally dishonest cadre of a few people in authority, and a system with virtually no avenue for redress combined to make my sister's and her son's life a living nightmare for over 4 years.

      And I agree with you about the flat tax, as I think I said in another thread. But it will never happen, because a 'progressive' tax is the perfect tool of government. You think they'll give it up? I just don't see it.
      Signature

      The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

      Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6282920].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Durham
    Sorry if I got you riled up Kim...I hope my feelings change. I loved being altruistic.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281925].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    John, not directed at you.... ( or actually any one in particular)

    Hell, you could tell me you were a communistic and I'd still love ya!

    I know a lot of your story and you know a lot of mine.

    I love my country,that doesn't mean I love my government.

    Punched in the face by the government?
    You'd be amazed if I told you how they were jerking me right this moment.
    (Maybe I will later in PM), but I still love my country,its the people currently running it I don't care for.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6281944].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Durham
    @ Steve, many of us practically live on the internet these days. I was amazed when I moved from Nashville to a small town in Arkansas a few years back to look after my grandmother...The day I arrived there was no internet, and I was sitting back in an easy chair thinking "Im surrounded by mountains, Im out in the middle of virtually NO WHERE, unplugged basically... I cant believe Im so far removed from the city". It was cool for a few days but strange after so many years...

    But then when I turned on the internet there was no difference between where I was and Nashville.

    I feel like when we are online we arent really in a country at all. Even money making limitations are lifted and not held back by location.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6282160].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Yes Steve, I did misunderstand what you meant.

    And I agree, I know there are countries in Europe that are Democratic Socialist countries.

    And America is headed down a dangerous path,that the country wont ever recover from if we the citizens continue to let it happen. But I don't see socialism as the problem.
    Am I a socialist because I believe that American citizens have a right to be protected from the corrupt government and pharma companies?
    Am I a socialist because after paying into the SS and Medicare program for over 40 years I expect to get a fair amount out of it?
    Sure,the system needs to be changed,but not at the expense of those that have funded it all these years.

    As a single parent of three daughters I also had my run ins with the government interfering where they have no right.
    As it is the government needs no legitimate reason to make someones life miserable for years claiming its for "the welfare of the children".
    In 99% of the cases the parent knows what best for the children,not some old woman that has never been married and works at a desk pushing through her idea of child raising,or the 22/23 years old that is fresh out of school with a Social Worker degree that has no real life experience.

    Every government worker needs to be help responsible for their every action.
    And I mean at every level.

    We need term limits.

    We need to eliminate both the IRS,which was suppose to be a temporary agency in the first place, and we need to eliminate the practice of using our SS number as an identification method. When created it was expressly stated that it was to never be used for that purpose.

    Sorry, off on a rant.

    But the reason a flat tax wont ever happen isn't because the government wont give it up, its because the majority of the public are sheep. And Americans as a whole have developed the attitude of "as long as its happening to him and not me,I don't care", so slowly it will be done until one day they will wake up and it will be too late.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6284558].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      if you want to leave my building, but pay the rent you owe up to this point before you go
      I don't understand that thinking in the context of this thread's topic.

      If you pay the rent due, give notice to your landlord and follow his rules - and then leave.....can the landlord charge you an increased rent for the time after you have moved?

      If you want to change the laws - change them. But don't change them retroactively to punish people who made decisions up to ten years ago. You don't have the right to interfere with the lives or money of people who followed the laws in place at the time they left.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6284603].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      ...But I don't see socialism as the problem.
      Am I a socialist because I believe that American citizens have a right to be protected from the corrupt government and pharma companies?
      NO
      Am I a socialist because after paying into the SS and Medicare program for over 40 years I expect to get a fair amount out of it?
      NO
      Sure,the system needs to be changed,but not at the expense of those that have funded it all these years.
      Agreed, 110%

      Every government worker needs to be help responsible for their every action.
      And I mean at every level.

      We need term limits.

      Dead on, sir.

      We need to eliminate both the IRS,which was suppose to be a temporary agency in the first place, and we need to eliminate the practice of using our SS number as an identification method. When created it was expressly stated that it was to never be used for that purpose.

      Sorry, off on a rant.
      Rant all you want, I agree. An SSIN is a de-facto government ID. Nothing happens without it. When the man asks, "Papers, please", your SS card is what you give them.

      But the reason a flat tax wont ever happen isn't because the government wont give it up, its because the majority of the public are sheep. And Americans as a whole have developed the attitude of "as long as its happening to him and not me,I don't care", so slowly it will be done until one day they will wake up and it will be too late.
      You are right, that is a major part of why it won't happen. But I think the pols who depend on the votes of those they're giving the money to will never give it up, either.

      I think I'll leave this by echoing a quote I ran across, by former slave Frederick Douglass:
      Find out just what people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them. ... The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.
      Unfortunately, a great many US citizens seem to have the opinion that endurance is a virtue :rolleyes:
      Signature

      The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

      Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285750].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Part of what I deleted was basically this:

    I remember when those that came to America and were granted both citizenship and the opportunity America gave them, gave back to the country and its citizens by creating charities, grants, fellowships,scholarships and many other ways of being thankful for the opportunity they received in the country.

    Now they come, get the citizenship, make more money than they probably could have anywhere else in the world then want to renounce what they were given to save a few bucks?
    Like I said, if its legal, fine, but don't let the door hit you on the way out.
    And don't try to come back.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6284843].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      Part of what I deleted was basically this:

      I remember when those that came to America and were granted both citizenship and the opportunity America gave them, gave back to the country and its citizens by creating charities, grants, fellowships,scholarships and many other ways of being thankful for the opportunity they received in the country.

      Now they come, get the citizenship, make more money than they probably could have anywhere else in the world then want to renounce what they were given to save a few bucks?
      Like I said, if its legal, fine, but don't let the door hit you on the way out.
      And don't try to come back.
      You know, I don't have the least little bit of a problem with locking the door behind this guy, or anyone else who wants to take their ball and go play in some other sandbox.

      I just wish there were a little more evident indignation directed at Chucky Schumer for trying to change the rules after the game is over. If he and his cohorts think this kind of law is needed going forward, fine, let them try to get it passed. But I always thought retroactive application of a new law wasn't allowed. Can't remember the legal term, can't talk Latin.
      Signature

      The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

      Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6285789].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

        But I always thought retroactive application of a new law wasn't allowed. Can't remember the legal term, can't talk Latin.
        Ex post Facto

        Ex post facto law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        I knew because it IS illegal! The constitution FORBIDS IT!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6288138].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author HeySal
          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

          Ex post Facto

          Ex post facto law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          I knew because it IS illegal! The constitution FORBIDS IT!

          Steve

          It's illegal because it's insane to prosecute someone for doing something that is legal when they do it. That's the same as arresting someone for not being clairvoyant. If this gov starts going after people retro - we will know for sure that we need to put our reps in mental institutions.
          Signature

          Sal
          When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
          Beyond the Path

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6289098].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Well one thing its called if we are talking about the same concept is a "grandfather clause".

    As far as this:
    "I just wish there were a little more evident indignation directed at Chucky Schumer for trying to change the rules after the game is over. If he and his cohorts think this kind of law is needed going forward, fine, let them try to get it passed. But I always thought retroactive application of a new law wasn't allowed. Can't remember the legal term, can't talk Latin."

    I'm not aware of the man or what he is trying to do, give me a link and I'll be happy to read it.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6286674].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
    U.S. Senators Charles Schumer and Bob Casey are pushing the "Ex-PATRIOT Act" in response to Saverin's leaving.

    Why the Ex-Patriot Act Is a Creepy Law - Conor Friedersdorf - Politics - The Atlantic

    Two U.S. Senators are trying to pass legislation that targets a specific individual whose legal behavior they found offensive.
    Signature

    The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

    Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6287385].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    There's a LOT of fault with that law. First off - how the hell do you PROVE someone's intentions? According to this law that would be determined (in favor of the IRS) just by someone continuing to make good money, or even starting to make good money, after they leave.

    Number 2 - why is the US still ruling you if you left because you can't stand the country? How is that different from the action of any other socialist/fascist gov that we have ever fought against?

    Number 3 - why aren't the citizens in those dung-brained psychotics regions kicking them out of office? We have a LOT of pension money going to THEM, too, if they get through to the re-election process, so will be living a great life for having screwed their country up even further. So why are people sitting with their thumbs up their butts and letting them continue to turn the US Congress into a freak show?
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6287451].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      There's a LOT of fault with that law. First off - how the hell do you PROVE someone's intentions? According to this law that would be determined (in favor of the IRS) just by someone continuing to make good money, or even starting to make good money, after they leave.
      ACTUALLY, for such a law to work, it must be applied PRIOR to departure! They may well be going into a WORSE situation! INDEED, some places I looked at going to, if I had enough money, had HIGHER taxes!!!!!!!

      PSSST!!!!!!!! Schumer, and all the rest. You want to hear a secret? *****NOBODY***** cares how high taxes are! They care about relative value! You keep my neighborhood clean and maintained, be thrifty, educate all, and treat this as a sovereign country, I would HAPPILY pay more! But you make laws making things dirtier, leave roads in disrepair, squandor money, and let everyone in virtually making all people, born here to americans, second class citizens. YOU should pay US!

      Number 2 - why is the US still ruling you if you left because you can't stand the country? How is that different from the action of any other socialist/fascist gov that we have ever fought against?
      EXACTLY

      Number 3 - why aren't the citizens in those dung-brained psychotics kicking them out of office? We have a LOT of pension money going to THEM, too, if they get through to the re-election process, so will be living a great life for having screwed their country up even further. So why are people sitting with their thumbs up their butts and letting them continue to turn the US Congress into a freak show?
      Excuse the religious reference...... AMEN!!!!!!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6288167].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    "we will know for sure that we need to put our reps in mental institutions."

    No, in prisons,for life.
    Let them lose all the rights they are taking away from us.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6290328].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Looks like the guy leaving the country isn't going to be worth as much as he thought.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6293381].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

    Governments do nothing but take money by force and use it to maintain power.

    We do not owe them anything.
    That's true. The citizenry could pay for a militia, schools, etc on their own and do it cheaply enough for everyone to reap the benefits without breaking their bank. A LOT of what we pay now just goes straight to the FED to pay interest on the debt. At one time if everyone would have bought all rights to their land (water, forestry, mineral, etc) that debt could have been paid off and we would have been free -- but they never even let people know that was the situation. Now the debt is so high, it can never be payed off - we just have to see the rape and call foul and kick them to the curb and force the gov to take back their duty to print money. Until that comes down to it -- we are owned lock, stock, and barrel by World Bank. Welcome to The United States of Goldman Sacs.

    BTW - we are not headed toward Democratic Socialism.........we are falling into fascism. Give it around 18 more months and there will be no more confusion about which form of socialism is being catered in.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6293792].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    NO OFFENSE, but I WISH I could say you were TOTALLY wrong!

    Militia? Do you REALIZE how great the US could have been with a TINY military etc....

    Schools? There is so much I had to go to libraries and bookstores to learn, etc... Some things were generally learned via a kind of mentoring. Today? WOW!

    So much is WASTED!

    As for the big F? Yep, I don't know why some people can't see it.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6294931].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      Kim -

      He's not "leaving the country" - Saverin moved to Singapore in 2009.

      This is not a new story - it's political posturing.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6295502].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Kay,
    In other words he already left the country? I was using the term leaving the country as meaning the same as giving up his citizenship.

    The story the thread is about is dated May 11th 2012.

    I'm not sure how it is political positioning, who is going to gain from it? The Repubs or the Dems?

    I wouldn't care where he lived, lots of Americans live a good portion of their life off the continental United States. Its the renouncing his citizenship that is the issue with me.
    As I said in my first post in this thread. He is nothing but an ungrateful SOB in my opinion.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6297942].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Wakunahum
      I believe that those who want harsher penalties placed on people renouncing their citizenship should be cautious.

      Regardless of what penalties are imposed on those who are renouncing citizenship, do you really believe that millionaires or billionaires won't find a way of funneling their money through another legal scheme to protect their assets?

      The reality of the situation is that those with the funds will hire lawyers to help them protect themselves and their assets while the working class, the poor, and the middle class who do not have the assets to protect them will be the ones who will suffer the punishments for wanting to leave. These classes simply do not have the time or resources to make sure they will be fine if they make this type of decision.

      What happens to my working class great grandchildren 75 years in the future who may want to leave because of problems that the government has caused them? Do I want them punished for wanting to seek greater opportunities elsewhere in the world?

      The rich and their heirs won't be the ones who have the issues but only the future working class from such laws.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6298820].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    "What happens to my working class great grandchildren 75 years in the future who may want to leave because of problems that the government has caused them?"

    No, you get off your ass and work now to make that scenerio impossible.

    But to answer your question, I don't want, and I don't see others advocating punishment. I've said several times that if what he did was legal,fine.
    But there is a large difference between legal and moral and ethical..
    Maybe what he did was legal.
    But I find in my opinion it falls short of the yardstick when it comes to ethical and moral.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6298924].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bailbondsguys
    I wonder how difficult it would be to regain US Citizenship after renouncing it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6299006].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      Regaining US citizenship is not a concern for the financially savvy ex-patriot.

      Joe Mobley

      Originally Posted by bailbondsguys View Post

      I wonder how difficult it would be to regain US Citizenship after renouncing it.
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6357151].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author befree22
    I read an article on activistpost (I think) about people wanting to diversify overseas because of all the draconic capital controls that Congress wants to enact.
    Signature

    The turtle always wins.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6299035].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      From what I've read, the U.S. is unusual in that it requires those living and earning outside the country to continue to pay US taxes on their earnings.

      The high exit tax imposed was one reason many ex-pats kept their citizenship. The downturn in the economy made portfolios worth less and thus lowered exit taxes so many living outside the U.S. decided to go ahead and officially "quit the country".

      There are laws in place now that say if you are leaving in order to evade taxes you may not get permission to cancel your citizenship - those laws comes under the Justice Dept.

      In Schumer's bill, those exit laws would be tightened...but...would be placed under the IRS instead of the Justice Dept. I think that should concern anyone as it seems to expand the authority of the IRS. The head of the IRS is a political appointment by the president - the Justice Department is a separate branch of govt. Just sayin...

      I guess I don't have a problem with this because I don't see where anything was done wrong. We have millions of people in the US who will never become citizens but who will collect from social programs here.

      Saverin became a citizen when his parents did - lived here, worked and paid his taxes for ten years - is paying millions in exit taxes and lives in another country where he plans to stay. He was brought to the U.S. by his parents - and now he's chosen where he wants to live. He has never said anything bad about the U.S.

      On the other hand we have a Chinese dissident brought here "for school" who dissed the U.S., wanted to come, then didn't want to come, almost caused an international incident. Who is paying for his continued education in the U.S. - and his housing and expenses and his kids education? What U.S. citizen student won't get into a graduate program because this man took that spot?
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6299363].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        From what I've read, the U.S. is unusual in that it requires those living and earning outside the country to continue to pay US taxes on their earnings.

        The high exit tax imposed was one reason many ex-pats kept their citizenship. The downturn in the economy made portfolios worth less and thus lowered exit taxes so many living outside the U.S. decided to go ahead and officially "quit the country".

        There are laws in place now that say if you are leaving in order to evade taxes you may not get permission to cancel your citizenship - those laws comes under the Justice Dept.

        In Schumer's bill, those exit laws would be tightened...but...would be placed under the IRS instead of the Justice Dept. I think that should concern anyone as it seems to expand the authority of the IRS. The head of the IRS is a political appointment by the president - the Justice Department is a separate branch of govt. Just sayin...

        I guess I don't have a problem with this because I don't see where anything was done wrong. We have millions of people in the US who will never become citizens but who will collect from social programs here.

        Saverin became a citizen when his parents did - lived here, worked and paid his taxes for ten years - is paying millions in exit taxes and lives in another country where he plans to stay. He was brought to the U.S. by his parents - and now he's chosen where he wants to live. He has never said anything bad about the U.S.

        On the other hand we have a Chinese dissident brought here "for school" who dissed the U.S., wanted to come, then didn't want to come, almost caused an international incident. Who is paying for his continued education in the U.S. - and his housing and expenses and his kids education? What U.S. citizen student won't get into a graduate program because this man took that spot?
        Not allowing people to give up citizenship is called what? I don't remember. What did we call it when East Germany did that? Oh yeah. Never mind.

        As far as the IRS - heads up. They are giving the IRS a LOT of powers over us soon. If you didn't believe me when I said we are owned by a bank, wait until the IRS gets to take your guns and tell you that you are not allowed to travel if you owe a certain amount of taxes. Right now the price they are putting on that won't be relevant to many -- but once that power is installed, they can do anything they want to our taxes, then when we can't pay, we are prisoners. When did "inalienable rights" start to mean -- "by authority of a BANK".

        Yes we have a lot of illegals here sucking up the wealth.... anyone can get into this country. But people coming here might want to stop and think about it real long and hard. Getting in isn't much of a problem -- but getting out is going to be next than impossible within the next few years.
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6299688].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        ...
        There are laws in place now that say if you are leaving in order to evade taxes you may not get permission to cancel your citizenship - those laws comes under the Justice Dept.

        In Schumer's bill, those exit laws would be tightened...but...would be placed under the IRS instead of the Justice Dept. I think that should concern anyone as it seems to expand the authority of the IRS. The head of the IRS is a political appointment by the president - the Justice Department is a separate branch of govt. Just sayin...

        ...
        Not to get technical, but this may change your perception about IRS vs Justice.

        The US Department of Justice isn't a 'separate branch' of the government, it is a Department of the Executive, as is the Department of the Treasury. Both fall under the direct authority of the President. The Secretaries of each are cabinet-level positions, and must be confirmed by Congress - unless the Prez makes a 'recess appointment'

        Both have their share of nasty internal agencies: DOJ has the FBI and DEA, and Treasury owns the IRS and the Secret Service. You're right, though - the heads of those particular agencies are also appointed, but Congress doesn't have to confirm them.

        Bottom line is the buck stops at the Prez's desk - or it used to...
        Signature

        The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

        Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6301218].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Kay,
    Who are you talking about when you say this:
    "We have millions of people in the US who will never become citizens but who will collect from social programs here."
    Definitely should not happen.
    I didn't quote your whole post because that was the only part of my reply directed to you.

    As far as the IRS:
    The IRS has always had too much power. It's very existence is improper. It was suppose to be a temporary agency that has turned into a monster. It is legalized theft It is legalized usury.

    But how many of you have written your congressmen and senators and told them to stop passing illegal laws?
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6299862].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      Once an alien worker has met eligibility criteria, we must have evidence of the lawful presence of the beneficiary. That means before we can pay out benefits for any given month, we must have evidence during that month the beneficiary was either:
      • A United States citizen;
      • A United States national; or
      • An alien lawfully present in the United States.
      If you are a legal resident but not a US citizen - you can qualify for everything from govt housing and food stamps to social security, Medicare and Medicaid. There are "services" to help these people (who often speak little English) fill out the required govt forms for various aid programs.

      I know a LOT of folks in my area who are not citizens and collect more from govt programs than we ever will. These folks work for cash (unreported income), get the tax-back benefits of the earned income program, etc.

      Qualifier: I'm not saying all immigrants do this, because they certainly don't. We have citizens who play the system, too.

      Knowing that - it makes no sense to me to have such a big deal over one person who did go through the hoops to be a citizen...and now has changed his mind. Saverin contributed while he was here - and that should be enough.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6300048].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    My eyes were not doing me right today, You said collect on social programs yet my brain read social security.
    You were correct on what you said. My Bad.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6300083].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
    "All about Benjamins"? Hmmm. My brother's name is Benjamin and he renounced his Canadian citizenship (to be a Japanese citizen).
    Signature

    Project HERE.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6302688].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cashtree
    read some senator so upset about this guy giving up his citizenship he bans to ban people forever from the US and all kinds of stuff. I wish senators had to get the approval of the people they represent before they go off issuing threats like these...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6357254].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Thats what recalls are all about.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6358002].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dallas playboy
    Don't let the door hit them in their asses. I wouldn't allow them back.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6358291].message }}

Trending Topics