... and I wanted to share it with you guys, to see what you think! It came to me in the form of a theory. I call it my 'theory of existence,' at least for now. After all, it's only a day old. Anyway, here goes - keep in mind that I'd suggest setting aside 2-3 minutes to read it through and really digest it before commenting back. Trust me, it'll make for clearer thinking, as it may get complicated.
I figured out the secret of life
63
... and I wanted to share it with you guys, to see what you think!
It came to me in the form of a theory. I call it my 'theory of existence,' at least for now. After all, it's only a day old. Anyway, here goes - keep in mind that I'd suggest setting aside 2-3 minutes to read it through and really digest it before commenting back. Trust me, it'll make for clearer thinking, as it may get complicated.
GOALS
1) To understand why we exist.
2) To explain how people generally perceive their existance.
3) To juxtapose all things as 'black and white' by simplifying them down to their essence (and, consequently, eliminating 'gray areas.')
4) To fathom the sacred simplicity of what everyone wants in life.
5) To contemplate further ideas about ideallistic values such as love, peace and prosperity.
ASSUMPTIONS
1) All consciousness is a judgement between right or wrong.
2) Certain natural things are accepted as 'right.'
3) We believe in the promotion of right things.
4) Things that we perceive as 'not right' are things that feel repulsive.
5) The combination of our experiences makes up our religion.
CRITICISM
1) The words 'right' and 'wrong' are too vague for interpretation.
2) 'Natural' things only seem so because we, observers, deem them as such.
3) Our beliefs, in and of themselves, are irrelevant.
4) There are varying degrees of 'acceptance' and 'repulsion.'
5) Religion is faith; experiences are real; therefore, experiences are not
religious.
REBUTTAL OF CRITICISM
1) Although 'right' and 'wrong' may be poorly defined terms, they can be substituted for opposing pairs of terms that any one person can determine as such. For instance, excessive greed vs. philanthropy.
2) 'Natural' things are those that will maintain themselves without human interaction. For instance, rivers and mountains which have outlived many species are 'Natural.'
3) Our beliefs are relevant to ourselves, despite possibly being irrelevant to outsiders.
4) This theory's goal is to Understand / Explain, not to Prescribe / Control.
5) To say that experiences are independent of religion have to renounce their own set of beliefs, as they would not be able to have them if they did not experience an emotion that provoked said religious thought.
APPLICABLE EXAMPLES
1) "All consciousness is a judgement between righteousness [positivity, enthusiasm, love] or wrongness [negativity, laziness, hate]."
2) "Certain natural things [lakes, oceans, clear skies] are accepted as 'right.'"
3) "We believe in the promotion of right [morality, brotherhood, peace] things."
4) "Things that we perceive as "not right" [war, jealousy, dissonance] feel repulsive."
5) "The combination of our experiences [childhood, school, work, marriage, family deaths] makes up our religion."
The "assumptions" are really the meat and bones here, but I added the other 4 sections just to elaborate!
It came to me in the form of a theory. I call it my 'theory of existence,' at least for now. After all, it's only a day old. Anyway, here goes - keep in mind that I'd suggest setting aside 2-3 minutes to read it through and really digest it before commenting back. Trust me, it'll make for clearer thinking, as it may get complicated.
GOALS
1) To understand why we exist.
2) To explain how people generally perceive their existance.
3) To juxtapose all things as 'black and white' by simplifying them down to their essence (and, consequently, eliminating 'gray areas.')
4) To fathom the sacred simplicity of what everyone wants in life.
5) To contemplate further ideas about ideallistic values such as love, peace and prosperity.
ASSUMPTIONS
1) All consciousness is a judgement between right or wrong.
2) Certain natural things are accepted as 'right.'
3) We believe in the promotion of right things.
4) Things that we perceive as 'not right' are things that feel repulsive.
5) The combination of our experiences makes up our religion.
CRITICISM
1) The words 'right' and 'wrong' are too vague for interpretation.
2) 'Natural' things only seem so because we, observers, deem them as such.
3) Our beliefs, in and of themselves, are irrelevant.
4) There are varying degrees of 'acceptance' and 'repulsion.'
5) Religion is faith; experiences are real; therefore, experiences are not
religious.
REBUTTAL OF CRITICISM
1) Although 'right' and 'wrong' may be poorly defined terms, they can be substituted for opposing pairs of terms that any one person can determine as such. For instance, excessive greed vs. philanthropy.
2) 'Natural' things are those that will maintain themselves without human interaction. For instance, rivers and mountains which have outlived many species are 'Natural.'
3) Our beliefs are relevant to ourselves, despite possibly being irrelevant to outsiders.
4) This theory's goal is to Understand / Explain, not to Prescribe / Control.
5) To say that experiences are independent of religion have to renounce their own set of beliefs, as they would not be able to have them if they did not experience an emotion that provoked said religious thought.
APPLICABLE EXAMPLES
1) "All consciousness is a judgement between righteousness [positivity, enthusiasm, love] or wrongness [negativity, laziness, hate]."
2) "Certain natural things [lakes, oceans, clear skies] are accepted as 'right.'"
3) "We believe in the promotion of right [morality, brotherhood, peace] things."
4) "Things that we perceive as "not right" [war, jealousy, dissonance] feel repulsive."
5) "The combination of our experiences [childhood, school, work, marriage, family deaths] makes up our religion."
The "assumptions" are really the meat and bones here, but I added the other 4 sections just to elaborate!
- David Braybrooke
- [1] reply
- vip-ip
- [1] reply
- HeySal
- [1] reply
- vip-ip
- FIP
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- vip-ip
- HeySal
- [ 2 ] Thanks
- [1] reply
- vip-ip
- [1] reply
- HeySal
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- vip-ip
- HeySal
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- John Durham
- [2] replies
- tagiscom
- Greg71
- lastdual
- [4] replies
- vip-ip
- tlangdon
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- [1] reply
- vip-ip
- vip-ip
- [1] reply
- tagiscom
- affshow
- vip-ip
- HeySal
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- [1] reply
- vip-ip
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- CharlieFor
- vip-ip
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- [1] reply
- HeySal
- [ 2 ] Thanks
- tagiscom
- nawshale
- thunderbird
- biz2mob
- [2] replies
- tagiscom
- vip-ip
- FIP
Next Topics on Trending Feed
-
63