Holy crap, Texas schools use radio tag trackers on its students?

68 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Did you know about this? Are you ok with it?

Wtf is wrong with people for even allowing this in the first place.

They are making the students wear these...




--snippet

ID badges containing radio tags started to be introduced at the start of the 2012 school year
to schools run by San Antonio's Northside Independent School District (NISD).
The tracking tags gave NISD a better idea of the numbers of students attending classes each day
- the daily average of which dictates how much cash it gets from state coffers.

BBC News - US school tag tracker project prompts court row
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I can't remember if I addressed this in another thread here or just on facebook.

    No. I am not alright with that. It absolutely infuriates me that anyone would be okay with this. Our government is treating us like livestock, and people are too drooling stupid to stop them. Who the hell is our gov to think they have a right to track our every move just because it's more convenient for them that way. I am not livestock. If I had a child and someone attempted to force them to carry RFID, I think I'd be implanting it somewhere that they didn't expect it to be implanted. If you act like slaves -- they will treat you as such. Anyone who acquiesces to this is either crazy as hell or they have absolutely no education in the history and evolution of fascist societies.

    This crap needs to stop now. Serious.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7384676].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Robert Michael
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      I can't remember if I addressed this in another thread here or just on facebook.

      No. I am not alright with that. It absolutely infuriates me that anyone would be okay with this. Our government is treating us like livestock, and people are too drooling stupid to stop them. Who the hell is our gov to think they have a right to track our every move just because it's more convenient for them that way. I am not livestock. If I had a child and someone attempted to force them to carry RFID, I think I'd be implanting it somewhere that they didn't expect it to be implanted. If you act like slaves -- they will treat you as such. Anyone who acquiesces to this is either crazy as hell or they have absolutely no education in the history and evolution of fascist societies.

      This crap needs to stop now. Serious.
      ^^ Sums up my feelings.

      This stuff truly has gone too far. People are too scared to stand up for themselves tho, unfortunately.

      And you all know what they say.

      "The person who stands for nothing will fall for everything"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387441].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author garyv
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7384805].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by garyv View Post

      It stems from laziness at the highest levels, and it's perpetrated by the unions.

      What ever happened to "JOHN BOY?!"... "HERE!"


      I can understand the convenience of it. But convenient is not always best.
      But Gary, that way a teacher would actually know who their students are. Don't you see the problem with that?
      If a teacher knows their student, then they may actually care about them and want them to learn.
      With the tracking chip the students remain nameless so the teacher only has to be concerned about the right percentage passing the mandated exams so the school gets it's funding.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385465].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        Why is it that every technology is automatically "wrong and bad" when it is used to track people - and yet those same people rush out to buy the newest technology? The "mark of the beast" excuse is ridiculous but it's become one of the "most used complaints".

        It's a pilot program and though I don't agree with the reason for doing it (money) I can see it having applications for security in the future.

        Those same students crying about rights to privacy have a cell phone with a GPS chip in their pocket and insist they must carry it in school "for security". But a simple badge is going to hurt them?

        We have schools with armed guards - several states are considering use of palm and finger scanners for school lunches, etc. To me a badge would be less intrusive than that.

        The same people screaming about 'religious and civil rights' probably carry smartID credit cards in their wallet and buy every new electronic gadget released to the market.

        Years ago, students were not allowed to leave the property during school hours. There were enough employees that a student leaving would be noticed. Today, kids leave school property to smoke, to get fast food for lunch, etc. In many schools today, classes are so large a teacher has no idea if a student is missing or not.

        The time to have a debate is AFTER the pilot program is tested and there are some results to look at.
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385569].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          Why is it that every technology is automatically "wrong and bad" when it is used to track people - and yet those same people rush out to buy the newest technology? The "mark of the beast" excuse is ridiculous but it's become one of the "most used complaints".
          Because it goes back to the idea of PRIVACY!!!! It is a VERY old concept. and what does buying the latest stuff have to do with it?

          It's a pilot program and though I don't agree with the reason for doing it (money) I can see it having applications for security in the future.
          It has been used for security for decades. I have been at a couple places that did that. But it was stated, optional, etc....

          Those same students crying about rights to privacy have a cell phone with a GPS chip in their pocket and insist they must carry it in school "for security". But a simple badge is going to hurt them?
          It is harder to track, not assigned to a particular company, and they can turn it off. AGAIN, you will say that their decisions ELSEWHERE void their right to make a decision here? SPECIOUS at best!

          We have schools with armed guards - several states are considering use of palm and finger scanners for school lunches, etc. To me a badge would be less intrusive than that.
          WOW, in these days of "GIVE EVERYONE LUNCH", I fail to see why they need to identify a particular student. I mean they say they base NO decisions on identity, so WHY try to determine the identity?

          The same people screaming about 'religious and civil rights' probably carry smartID credit cards in their wallet and buy every new electronic gadget released to the market.
          AGAIN with this? Frankly, people against this are against this EVERYWHERE. I don't like being exposed to microwaves, but they are EVERYWHERE! I STILL need a cell phone! But I STILL get a patdown at the airport EVEN with the milliwave scanners.

          Years ago, students were not allowed to leave the property during school hours. There were enough employees that a student leaving would be noticed. Today, kids leave school property to smoke, to get fast food for lunch, etc. In many schools today, classes are so large a teacher has no idea if a student is missing or not.
          A class that is that large is TOO large!

          The time to have a debate is AFTER the pilot program is tested and there are some results to look at.
          NOPE! It IS, and is SUPPOSED TO BE, BEFORE it is started!

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385615].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author kenmichaels
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          Why is it that every technology is automatically "wrong and bad" when it is used to track people - and yet those same people rush out to buy the newest technology? The "mark of the beast" excuse is ridiculous but it's become one of the "most used complaints".

          It's a pilot program and though I don't agree with the reason for doing it (money) I can see it having applications for security in the future.

          Those same students crying about rights to privacy have a cell phone with a GPS chip in their pocket and insist they must carry it in school "for security". But a simple badge is going to hurt them?

          We have schools with armed guards - several states are considering use of palm and finger scanners for school lunches, etc. To me a badge would be less intrusive than that.

          The same people screaming about 'religious and civil rights' probably carry smartID credit cards in their wallet and buy every new electronic gadget released to the market.

          Years ago, students were not allowed to leave the property during school hours. There were enough employees that a student leaving would be noticed. Today, kids leave school property to smoke, to get fast food for lunch, etc. In many schools today, classes are so large a teacher has no idea if a student is missing or not.

          The time to have a debate is AFTER the pilot program is tested and there are some results to look at.
          I don't have a "smart phone" i have a flip top with the gps disabled.
          My wife has one... but its her choice.

          No debate is needed. You brand and track animals/ livestock/ prisoners.
          Not people.

          Once upon a time, i did think the way you do...
          but then our illustrious government stuck its nose into all of my business
          and did everything in its power to ruin me. Me, a law abiding citizen.

          So call me paranoid, or extreme or think whatever you want.
          I have been there, i have earned the right to say. WTF.

          I am now at the point, if i see some thing ... i say some thing
          and let people make up there own minds.

          To me this rfd thing is about choice. Kids have none, they are indoctrinated
          to listen to adults. Even if the adults are wrong.

          Not to mention, who knows how much info is actually stored on those chips.
          Rfid is not known for its security. Any pedifile, stalker, kidnapper
          or nefarious individual with half a brain and 40.00 can make a reader.
          Signature

          Selling Ain't for Sissies!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386040].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ernie Lo
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7384991].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JoeUK
      Originally Posted by Ernie Lo View Post

      Unfortunately It's going to be inside all of our bodies in years to come. Not enough people are going to stand up, and as usual the sheep who cant think for themselves and love being slaves are going to ruin it for the rest of us.
      ^ This. It's the 'totalitarian tiptoe' at work, getting the younger generations used to having a tracking ID on them at all times under the guise of 'convenience' or 'safety', so when the time comes for permanent implant in the future, there will be minimal opposition. Good for her for making a stand.
      Signature
      Popular MoRoN.com - Because Everything Popular Is Wrong...

      Uplifd.com - Positive News, Uplifting Views & Inspirational Tidbits!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385326].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Tina Golden
        Okay, I'll come down on the opposite side on this one. I would have absolutely no problem with kids having to wear some sort of tracking device like this in our schools.

        Why is it invasion of privace for the school to be able to see exactly where the students are during school hours?

        That's what they're supposed to be doing. It's just not possible to do so any longer with the massive cutbacks in education funding leading to staff cuts.

        After Columbine and so many similar incidents, along with other criminal activities in high schools, I think being able to see where students are located on school grounds is a good idea.
        Signature
        Discover how to have fabulous, engaging content with
        Fast & Easy Content Creation
        ***Especially if you don't have enough time, money, or just plain HATE writing***
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385384].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
          I can only think of one incident where this would have been a good thing and that's where a student was abducted from his elementary school and later found murdered. It could have saved his life.

          However, that happening is extremely rare and the negatives most certainly outweigh all of the positives. I am completely against desensitization in our youth. That plan is so blatantly obvious. Implement it when they're children and it will become a common excepted way of life for them.

          This quote variant comes to mind.

          People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.
          Terra
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385454].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Tina Golden View Post

          Okay, I'll come down on the opposite side on this one. I would have absolutely no problem with kids having to wear some sort of tracking device like this in our schools.
          GREAT! Why don't YOU wear one, and tell us how to track you!?

          Why is it invasion of privace for the school to be able to see exactly where the students are during school hours?
          Well, it WOULD be, but they also want it AFTER hours! Let's not forget the MA school caught tracking and VIDEOING students through laptops! One young girl said she had the laptop in her BEDROOM! A lot of such pictures would be a FELONY! Can you say .... KIDDY PORN?

          That's what they're supposed to be doing. It's just not possible to do so any longer with the massive cutbacks in education funding leading to staff cuts.
          If it "isn't possible to do anymore", then they are committing a felony. They should make the classes smaller, etc... Or maybe the teachers should just work harder.

          After Columbine and so many similar incidents, along with other criminal activities in high schools, I think being able to see where students are located on school grounds is a good idea.
          Come on! This would NOT have prevented, or in any way changed the outcome of, columbine.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385571].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author ThomM
            The same people screaming about 'religious and civil rights' probably carry smartID credit cards in their wallet and buy every new electronic gadget released to the market.
            Wrong.
            After Columbine and so many similar incidents, along with other criminal activities in high schools, I think being able to see where students are located on school grounds is a good idea. .
            No offense intended towards you Tina, but I am flat out sick and tired of people using Columbine and 9/11 as excuses for allowing the government to infringe on our privacy, rights, and freedoms.
            When my youngest was 14 she was almost expelled from school for saying she didn't like one of her teachers and wanted to punch her. This happened before classes started and she got a call on her cell from her sister. As she was turning her phone off the teacher tried to forcibly take it from her. When I say forcibly, the teacher pinned her against the wall and tried to get the phone out of her pocket. That was fine with the school, but a 60 lb. girl voicing her opinion on a 150 lb. women using force on her wasn't.

            At her hearing the principle said "After Columbine and 9/11 we have to take this things very seriously."
            I won't go into the details of the hearing, but I will say that the school board and principle learned that day not to piss me off and that I will defend my children and family.
            By the way she didn't get expelled either
            Signature

            Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
            Getting old ain't for sissy's
            As you are I was, as I am you will be
            You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385647].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Folofa
          I don't think it is the responsibility of the schools to baby sit our kids. Our kids doing the right thing when away from their parents come from home.We as a country are loosing all our civil rights and freedoms that were fought from our fore fathers. People died for our rights.Yes, our constitutional rights. Let us not be so naive as to trust any school system or anyone else with our kids. Do you really think this is about the welfare of our kids. PLEASE- If more people would open their eyes and really take a look, maybe, just maybe we would have a chance of surviving the turmoil that is heading our way.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7392189].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    A lot of Americans, since before the country was founded, expected THIS to happen.

    It is used to track and control the students and punish them if they do anything unwanted. The next step is nearly ALWAYS to implant it. Talked about in movies and currently done with pets ******AND HUMANS, to some degree******!

    And chips eventually only contain a number. That number, however, can refer to databases and be used to even determine what block you were on in a particular moment, and find a camera that took your picture.

    ALSO, there are already several ways to use it to buy and sell.

    garyv,

    As I understand it, she was expected to ALWAYS have it on her, as IF it were implanted. This was NOT just for school!

    In fact, WHAT good is this for school? I mean NOBODY cares if they are in school. They want them to be in CLASS, hopefully learning something proper. Are they going to use this to track down truants? Unlikely. Besides, why should all suffer for the infinitesimal possibility that it MIGHT help a couple people? Are they going to use it to get people in school to class? AGAIN, UNLIKELY.

    They would have better luck putting these on the "teachers".

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385375].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Lol, I would take my tag home & reprogram it, each day would have a new ID/Name. The school would be wondering WTH is going on.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385909].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Lol, I would take my tag home & reprogram it, each day would have a new ID/Name. The school would be wondering WTH is going on.
      That is something to check into.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7385960].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    apparently, at their base, they work as I thought. You might not be able to change the chips.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386043].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ernie Lo
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386294].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Ernie Lo View Post

      Those that appose must watch this video from years ago. Another "conspiracy guy" right again. Maybe they are not crazy after all? Well I already know the answer to that...
      Aaron Russo RFID Human Implant Chip - YouTube
      A LOT of this stuff has been EXPECTED for over 2000 years. They ALWAYS knew it would be hundreds of years to get it in a logically reasonable way. It all became practical like in the 1990s, and people started talking about getting rid of paper currency, more and more people talk about the cost of producing the tangible currency. A lot of THAT became facilitated as early as the 1960s.

      To consider this a CRAZY fallacy that would never come to pass became pretty silly after around the 1990s. If not for distrust of the government, and the fact that it is IDENTICAL to what the bible stated, people all over the planet would be asking WHY NOT? I mean people couldn't steal money from you, you would always have all credit with you, and identification of the innocent at stops, and the guilty would be caught, etc... SOUNDS GREAT! Throw the distrust, freedom, and history in, and you think OH MY GOD, everyone will always know where I am, what I buy, thy may steal EVERYTHING from me, I may not be able to go abroad, etc.... At the time they patterned that "profile" after jewels life, *I* had nails, *I* had fertilizer, *I* was middle aged, etc.... I could have fit the profile.

      AND remember, some governments have changed from a just and free government into a nightmare dictatorship in less than a DAY!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386805].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author garyv
    I'm finding myself on the fence on this one. I'm all for privacy rights and would no way want this to happen outside of school. However I also believe that a child that is in a public school should not have the same privacy rights as an adult.

    That being said, I'd be willing to wager that there aren't very many abductions from school. Most happen when the kid is on the way to or from school. In which case a badge at school would do no good.

    I guess in my opinion it should be left up to the parent. If a parent wants to keep track of their child, they should provide them with a gps cell phone that they can carry before and after school.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386639].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      I don't have a "smart phone" i have a flip top with the gps disabled.
      Same here, sort of. I also have data blocking on my phone.
      I don't always take my phone with me and sometimes (just to be a dick) I'll take the battery out when traveling and only put it in to make a call.
      I look at the rfd chips in schools as just getting the kids used to being tracked before they become adults.

      Ernie, I didn't watch the video, but all three of my step-daughters where asked if they wanted their babies 'chipped'.
      None did
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386696].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alex Barboza
    I don't see this happening anytime soon here in Colombia. (Fortunately). I don't agree with this even if security of our children is used as the excuse. I am a little impressed that some people here accept it. I never expected that.

    The real problem, in my opinion, is not the privacy of our children (it's good for us parents and for teachers to keep track of their activities) but the fact that they are getting used to being tracked. People that grow thinking this is normal (and right) will accept any kind of abuse in the name of security.

    I could use some tracking for my children but wouldn't accept schools (and goverments) to use it in them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386729].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    First thing - if we allow children tracked, exactly how long will it be before YOU get your own little chip?
    Second - the idea that this is okay is the same as the idea that gov has ownership of you. That is NOT okay. Why do they need to know where you are all the time? Why are you okay with that? Schools do not OWN us. We pay for the education system. They are not our owners. It would be easy for them to discipline the kid if they know where it is (and at the point they wear chips, they are it, not he and she), it is also a statement that they are the owners of the property. An organization that works for YOU does not have ownership rights. If they lose track of students because they can't take roll instead of checking a device for info, they are not qualified to work for you. Fire them.

    Columbine was not the result of not enough control over students. It was the result of schools thinking they own children - it was the school having the child drugged with dangerous psychotropic drugs that lead to the shootings. These drugs have been at the root of almost every school shooting, yet parents aren't at schools recalling officials and telling them to stop drugging their kids. Now it's chipping them - pure unadulterated ownership of another person. You're okay with thar, eh? Kewl because next it's chipping you.

    If you want to be livestock, great - but don't take my freedoms down with you.
    Years ago, students were not allowed to leave the property during school hours. There were enough employees that a student leaving would be noticed. Today, kids leave school property to smoke, to get fast food for lunch, etc. In many schools today, classes are so large a teacher has no idea if a student is missing or not.
    The school has absolutely not one reason to know where or what kids do when they are not at school. If they allow them to leave for lunch, they are not responsible for that kid until classes start again. You are actually giving permission for them to own your children when you say they need to know anything about that kid on off school time. That's what parents are for. School is supposed to be a learning institution - not a ruler, owner, babysitter. Teachers do have larger classes, but if a teacher is not intelligent enough to learn the faces and names of their students after a few weeks - they don't have the intelligence to teach them anything. Could you stand in front of a class of 40 kids every day for two weeks and not recognize who is in that classroom even if you didn't have the name? This is what calling role is for.

    I'm worse sick of seeing our own citizens acquiesce to this kind of thing than I am of the government trying to implement it. If these things were only implemented on people who were okay with being owned like this, I wouldn't get so mad. Some of us, however, do care about our freedom and to have it implemented against us because YOU are okay with it? I am so not down with it. Let you live with the consequences of your own short-sightedness. Leave me alone.

    Don't forget - they are not giving families a choice - they are "implementing" it. That is not something a free people have done to them. If there is no choice - it's not okay. Period.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386778].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author LarryC
      << Don't forget - they are not giving families a choice - they are "implementing" it. That is not something a free people have done to them. If there is no choice - it's not okay. Period.>>

      The whole idea that the government can dictate to parents what kids do in school needs to be questioned. Once you accept that they have the right to enforce whatever policies they want, having "chipped" kids is just one example of what can happen.

      I remember seeing one of Aaron Russo's documentaries some years ago. Not that long ago, you were paranoid if you talked about the government wanting to chip people. Now it's starting to sound almost normal and reasonable (not to me, but to lots of others apparently).
      Signature
      Content Writing, Ghostwriting, eBooks, editing, research.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386852].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tina Golden
      There is a big difference between having all adults be monitored and having children be monitored. I don't believe in a right to privacy for a child when it comes to what happens at school or when it comes to their parents.

      And I read that story in the OP. No where did it say she had to where the tag when not in school. Unless you have access to other documentation, that is not what is happening.

      First of all, we're not discussing tracking people round the clock at this point. It's kids while on school property. Period.

      Right now, this is simply to know where the students are when they are at school. That's all and I don't see that as a bad thing.

      Several of you are dragging so much more into this and it's not happening. Why argue about what might happen when we should be figuring out how to deal with what has and is happening right now?

      I'm not saying the program would even be effective, because I don't know. I just don't agree that it's a bad thing, the way it stands.
      Signature
      Discover how to have fabulous, engaging content with
      Fast & Easy Content Creation
      ***Especially if you don't have enough time, money, or just plain HATE writing***
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386858].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Tina Golden
        Columbine was not the result of not enough control over students. It was the result of schools thinking they own children - it was the school having the child drugged with dangerous psychotropic drugs that lead to the shootings. These drugs have been at the root of almost every school shooting, yet parents aren't at schools recalling officials and telling them to stop drugging their kids. Now it's chipping them - pure unadulterated ownership of another person. You're okay with thar, eh? Kewl because next it's chipping you.
        Schools do not drug kids, or at least, not on my end of the country. They can recommend it to parents, but it's the parents or guardians who decide whether to give medication to their children. Parents abdicate their proper role and allow the school to tell them what they should do, and then they can blame the school for all their child's problems.

        Drugs are not the root of school shootings. Children growing up with no boundaries, over-exposed to death and violence, and without the values they need to be taught because the psychologists have decided that their egos are far too fragile - that's what leads to school shootings.
        Signature
        Discover how to have fabulous, engaging content with
        Fast & Easy Content Creation
        ***Especially if you don't have enough time, money, or just plain HATE writing***
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386876].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by Tina Golden View Post

          Schools do not drug kids, or at least, not on my end of the country. They can recommend it to parents, but it's the parents or guardians who decide whether to give medication to their children.
          Apparently teachers DO carry a lot of weight.

          Parents abdicate their proper role and allow the school to tell them what they should do, and then they can blame the school for all their child's problems.
          Yeah, parents COULD do better.

          Children growing up with no boundaries, over-exposed to death and violence, and without the values they need to be taught because the psychologists have decided that their egos are far too fragile - that's what leads to school shootings.
          Well, forget the hyped up lip service. Most kids are ENCOURAGED to bully. Whether bullys going to the nth degree, or victims that are fed up or just SNAP, the use of weapons is a logical outcome. If they are fed up, they may target the bullies. If they snap, they may be extra sensitive and attack almost anyone that isn't a friend. And the less they have to lose, the more likely they are to do something so drastic.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387204].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author HeySal
          Originally Posted by Tina Golden View Post

          Schools do not drug kids, or at least, not on my end of the country. They can recommend it to parents, but it's the parents or guardians who decide whether to give medication to their children. Parents abdicate their proper role and allow the school to tell them what they should do, and then they can blame the school for all their child's problems.

          Drugs are not the root of school shootings. Children growing up with no boundaries, over-exposed to death and violence, and without the values they need to be taught because the psychologists have decided that their egos are far too fragile - that's what leads to school shootings.
          Tina - almost unanimously, mass shootings have been enacted by people taking psychotrophic drugs and - yes, there are many places that the drugging is mandatory if the school says so. I know a woman who was under threat of having her child taken from her if she didn't drug him. I knew that kid - he was extremely intelligent and that was ALL that was wrong with him. One week on those drugs and he was drooling - and I mean literally. He was sitting in front of of a TV with his mouth hanging open and drooling. Mandated. She was in court when I moved and I don't know how it ended. Ask Terra about schools mandating drugging for kids. She had quite the battle for her own kid going at one time.

          You really want your kids thinking that surveillance of this level is okay? You also okay with your officials strip searching kids? I fought a school system on that myself. Making little girls take off their clothes for adult male principles because the little girl might have a pack of cigs on her. Kids are not possessions they are people. It is just wrong to teach a child such abject obedience that they will stand and let someone take every right of theirs as a sentient being without so much as a raised hand of protest. When a government demands abject and absolute obedience, check out the history of what happens next. Historically, the same thing ALWAYS happens next. Genocide. You think that can't happen here? Consider a whole generation of kids knowing they can't make one move that isn't observed or make one wrong step that isn't considered reason for arrest and detention. Walking on eggshells is a damned hard way to live.

          You might think that it's okay to put a monitor on a kid - but that's exactly why they start with kids. It allows them to violate rights legally. People will say "oh, but it will make our children more "controllable" and "safe". Well, know what - once those rights are legally violated, they can also COMMAND you to follow suit. And those devices will make YOU much more controllable, too.

          No - it's not one thing to do it to kids and to do it to adults. Not one damned thing. It's just the only route they know to take that people will be naive enough to not completely revolt against.
          Signature

          Sal
          When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
          Beyond the Path

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387432].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
            Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

            Ask Terra about schools mandating drugging for kids. She had quite the battle for her own kid going at one time.
            Absolutely true and unbelievable!

            I don't want to give too many details as I am writing a book with each and every ugly detail, but I will tell you this.

            It caused the otherwise meek and mild mannered Mrs. Kern turn Momma Bear protecting her cub in the wild, with teeth bared and each and every claw sharpened to a deadly point in a final battle against a whole school district. It consumed two whole years of our lives, but we did it! This was all because my child was gifted. :rolleyes:

            Ha! They even called me the following year and offered me a position working with children with learning disabilities and special needs.

            And I'd do battle again against tracking my child too!

            Terra
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387544].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author HeySal
              Originally Posted by MissTerraK View Post

              Absolutely true and unbelievable!

              I don't want to give too many details as I am writing a book with each and every ugly detail, but I will tell you this.

              It caused the otherwise meek and mild mannered Mrs. Kern turn Momma Bear protecting her cub in the wild, with teeth bared and each and every claw sharpened to a deadly point in a final battle against a whole school district. It consumed two whole years of our lives, but we did it! This was all because my child was gifted. :rolleyes:

              Ha! They even called me the following year and offered me a position working with children with learning disabilities and special needs.

              And I'd do battle again against tracking my child too!

              Terra
              LMAO Terra - um..........I believe your children are now old enough to defend themselves, Granny. You might wanna provide backup forces for the grand-rug-rats, though.
              Signature

              Sal
              When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
              Beyond the Path

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387679].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
                Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

                LMAO Terra - um..........I believe your children are now old enough to defend themselves, Granny. You might wanna provide backup forces for the grand-rug-rats, though.
                Haha! I meant if I had a child of school age now.

                Oh yes, Granny Bear is standing by!

                Terra
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387693].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
                  Let me suggest that many of you are fighting the wrong fight.

                  If you knew that a huge, powerful hurricane was coming your way (think Sandy, New York, New Jersey) do you try to stop the wind or get out of town?

                  Joe Mobley
                  Signature

                  .

                  Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387711].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
                    Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                    Let me suggest that many of you are fighting the wrong fight.

                    If you knew that a huge, powerful hurricane was coming your way (think Sandy, New York, New Jersey) do you try to stop the wind or get out of town?

                    Joe Mobley
                    Mother nature vs human nature isn't really a valid comparison, in my opinion, Joe. Besides, if a person "gets out of town" every time something ugly rears it's head, you may sooner or later run out of places to run to.
                    Signature

                    Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7388073].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                    You're right. Those people who don't like this intrusion of government can just secede from Texas! and go to California. We're more about liberty here than any other state.

                    Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                    Let me suggest that many of you are fighting the wrong fight.

                    If you knew that a huge, powerful hurricane was coming your way (think Sandy, New York, New Jersey) do you try to stop the wind or get out of town?

                    Joe Mobley
                    Signature
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7388132].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
                      Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                      You're right. Those people who don't like this intrusion of government can just secede from Texas! and go to California. We're more about liberty here than any other state.
                      As long as you don't want to step on an inch of open land maybe. I felt like I was living in a cage in that state. Some people need open land to feel free. A postage stamp park with cameras all over it just doesn't do it for me.
                      Signature

                      Sal
                      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
                      Beyond the Path

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7388452].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                      Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                      You're right. Those people who don't like this intrusion of government can just secede from Texas! and go to California. We're more about liberty here than any other state.
                      I lived in california most of my life. It isn't that free. That is one of the reasons they have had all this economic trouble. And the current problem is NOT a new one! In fact there were MAJOR problems before schwarzenegger, which is how HE got to be governor, and now they have MORE problems. HECK ONE class action lawsuit I was invited to was for a hotel I was in in Northern California. They charged an energy surtax of like $7.50 a NIGHT. But the fact is that many entities were doing that. Energy was INCREDIBLY expensive. From what I heard it affected the very poor and very rich alike. They are also trying to put cameras everywhere. Of course, they try to hide them.

                      ALSO, did you know that things like textbooks often START in texas!? Like it or not, at the moment, the states of the US are NOT like the continents once were. They are more like organs in ones body. Many others may depend on something from one, and that one might eventually affect the others.

                      Steve
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7388731].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author ThomM
                    Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

                    Let me suggest that many of you are fighting the wrong fight.

                    If you knew that a huge, powerful hurricane was coming your way (think Sandy, New York, New Jersey) do you try to stop the wind or get out of town?

                    Joe Mobley
                    We fortify our properties, get to a safe place till the storm passes then go back and rebuild, making things stronger to withstand the next assault.
                    When prop. 37 was defeated in Ca. thanks to companies like Monsanto and General Mills pumping over 47 million dollars into false ads, did we decide it was the wrong fight? No. we regrouped and now have people active in 30 states fighting for our right to know what we eat.
                    There are over 50 countries with labeling laws, so yes we could of said Monsanto is to big, this is a fight we can't win and moved somewhere else.
                    But when things get bad the American spirit gets strong and we stand and fight.
                    Win or lose, I'd rather stand and fight then run and hide.
                    Signature

                    Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
                    Getting old ain't for sissy's
                    As you are I was, as I am you will be
                    You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7389499].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                      My post was a joke by the way. Kind of. The story does take place in Texas though. It's a local issue from what I can tell. It can easily be dealt with by the people in the state,county or city I would think. If it does upset them enough that is.
                      Signature
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7389954].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
                        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                        My post was a joke by the way. Kind of. The story does take place in Texas though. It's a local issue from what I can tell. It can easily be dealt with by the people in the state,county or city I would think. If it does upset them enough that is.
                        A community can fire its school board and officials fairly easily. The problem lies in finding enough parents that aren't too droolin' stupid to understand why there is a problem with this crap. One good strong PTA meeting could put it right in a snap. If not, then people would need only to go after town officals, and then county. Fixing things at the local level isn't that hard. If more people would fix things in their own towns, you'd be so surprised how quickly the results would start rolling uphill.
                        Signature

                        Sal
                        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
                        Beyond the Path

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7390959].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author KimW
                        Originally Posted by TimPhelan View Post

                        My post was a joke by the way. Kind of. The story does take place in Texas though. It's a local issue from what I can tell. It can easily be dealt with by the people in the state,county or city I would think. If it does upset them enough that is.
                        I just saw this after responding to the first post.
                        I then deleted my response.
                        Signature

                        Read A Post.
                        Subscribe to a Newsletter
                        KimWinfrey.Com

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7393678].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
                          No problem Kim. I didn't see it anyways. haha I'm sure it wasn't that bad. ( Or waaassss it? lol )

                          Originally Posted by KimW View Post

                          I just saw this after responding to the first post.
                          I then deleted my response.
                          Signature
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7397175].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Not sure if it was that fast, Steve - but they turn fast. Regime after regime have one thing in common, too - they took the people by surprise. The people thought the gov was their friend and they got pooned.

    Now we have people spitting "conspiracy theory".

    Well ya know what? The intellectual will always watch for conspiracies - because they understand what average drooling joe can't figure out. Gov doesn't just do a lot of random crap. It's an organized entity that forms visions and goals and strives for them like any other group or organization does. To think that the idea that a bunch of people who were good enough at making plans to achieve their own power and wealth get together with others and make plans to get more of it is "conspiracy theory" or "whacked" in some way is so naive that it can't even pass for a rational thought. Come on. jeesh. If they are making bills about something, they have an idea which way they want things to flow - they aren't just saying, "ah wow, lets legistlate this." Good grief. So how far can forced compliance go before a person should be expected to wake up and relize they've been had and that, yes, the rich and powerful do make plans that you don't "need" to know about?

    Can't happen to us? LMAO. It already has.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7386856].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Not sure if it was that fast, Steve - but they turn fast. Regime after regime have one thing in common, too - they took the people by surprise. The people thought the gov was their friend and they got pooned.
      Apparently there are examples of PRECISELY that THIS MONTH! So I wasn't even talking ancient history. Grated they didn't happen HERE. ICSM.

      Now we have people spitting "conspiracy theory".
      It's a theory about a conspiracy. Such conspiracies have happened MANY thousands of times in the past, and most weren't acknowledged until much later. The only question with some of the newer ones is connection and intent. The actual conspiracy part is fact. After all, things like using RFID chips like this don't happen with the consent of only one person, etc...

      Well ya know what? The intellectual will always watch for conspiracies - because they understand what average drooling joe can't figure out. Gov doesn't just do a lot of random crap. It's an organized entity that forms visions and goals and strives for them like any other group or organization does. To think that the idea that a bunch of people who were good enough at making plans to achieve their own power and wealth get together with others and make plans to get more of it is "conspiracy theory" or "whacked" in some way is so naive that it can't even pass for a rational thought. Come on. jeesh. If they are making bills about something, they have an idea which way they want things to flow - they aren't just saying, "ah wow, lets legistlate this." Good grief. So how far can forced compliance go before a person should be expected to wake up and relize they've been had and that, yes, the rich and powerful do make plans that you don't "need" to know about?

      Can't happen to us? LMAO. It already has.
      EXACTLY! Bills list out conspiracies of a sort ALL THE TIME to get money to some group or company, etc.... Is it really hard to believe that the group or company had an ulterior motive or maybe was selected for one?

      But we really are like the proverbial frogs in the pot.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387171].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Tina said: (And I'm not singling you out Tina,just addressing a comment you made).
    "Several of you are dragging so much more into this and it's not happening. Why argue about what might happen when we should be figuring out how to deal with what has and is happening right now?

    I'm not saying the program would even be effective, because I don't know. I just don't agree that it's a bad thing, the way it stands."

    The answer to these questions are real simple.
    No changes that happen happen quickly.They do it a step at a time so before you know it what might can happen,has.

    I can guarantee you that the program, "The way it stands" will be totally unrecognizable in 3-5 years down the line iif allowed to go forward.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7387731].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Merlina
    Two words to solve this problem. "Home Schooling"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7390411].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jessie Stevens
    For my first year of high school, I attended a school that required us to carry a school issued picture ID. If you forgot your ID you were not allowed in class and sent down to the "ID Room" where you would have to pay them $1.00 for a temporary Sticker ID. If you did not have $1.00 to spend you were automatically sent to "In School Suspension" for the day.

    So guess what happened to me....yeah, no ID and didn't have $1.00 to give to the school. Guess where I ended up...in school suspension....I went home and told my parents what happened. They ended up pulling me out of high school and homeschooling me. They were so outraged that they would allow me to miss class for not having an ID and having no money to pay for one.

    The schools are getting worse each and every year.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7391983].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Jessie Stevens View Post

      For my first year of high school, I attended a school that required us to carry a school issued picture ID. If you forgot your ID you were not allowed in class and sent down to the "ID Room" where you would have to pay them $1.00 for a temporary Sticker ID. If you did not have $1.00 to spend you were automatically sent to "In School Suspension" for the day.

      So guess what happened to me....yeah, no ID and didn't have $1.00 to give to the school. Guess where I ended up...in school suspension....I went home and told my parents what happened. They ended up pulling me out of high school and homeschooling me. They were so outraged that they would allow me to miss class for not having an ID and having no money to pay for one.

      The schools are getting worse each and every year.
      Heck yeah! Unless the ID IS injected into the person, it is NOT proof of them being there! A friend could carry it, or swipe it, and GPS, or normal triangulation, could NOT isolate the signal. They wouldn't be that precise. And if you can look at the id, you can look at the person, and ids can be forged. If they suspend you, they should not take the funds for you. If you don't pass for that year, they shouldn't get the funds for that year.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7392150].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        Steve - I find nothing that claims these badges are to be used except during school hours. The students don't seem to have a huge problem with them:

        “At first they were saying, ‘We don’t like it, it is dumb,’” student Tira Starr said, “but all the people saying that were the skippers, the ones always getting into trouble.” Starr herself doesn’t have a problem with the new ID badge.

        Perhaps the ultimate indicator of acceptance within the student body is that they’ve now taken to personalizing and decorating their ID badges and lanyards.

        The school district is pleased with the program. Attendance is up 3 percent since it started a month ago. Even so, administrators say, it’s too soon to tell whether the program will be expanded to other schools in the district next year.

        It's an attempt to keep kids in school - and I don't think it deserves the level of hysteria and projection it's getting.

        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7392237].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author jtchaschowy
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          Steve - I find nothing that claims these badges are to be used except during school hours. The students don't seem to have a huge problem with them:
          Doesn't matter if the first ushering in of this is just for schools and just during school hours.

          I'll give them credit for how they are marketing it; guising the technology as child safety precautions to be pushed on fresh and ignorant young minds and their fearful, gullible parents.

          It's getting you comfortable with the idea of giving away your freedom to protect yourself from those evil child kidnappers and the terrorists.

          Meanwhile you're just a cattle for the state, among the rest of the docile tax revenue generating machine population.

          It's slow, gradual decline. And you fail to see it, and I weep.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7392270].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
            Originally Posted by jtchaschowy View Post


            It's getting you comfortable with the idea of giving away your freedom to protect yourself from those evil child kidnappers and the terrorists.
            Usually when someone writes a sentence using the word evil in a sarcastic way the examples afterward aren't very evil. In this case child kidnappers and terrorists actually are pretty evil. :/


            It's slow, gradual decline. And you fail to see it, and I weep.
            No need to weep dude. It's in the courts now. Lets wait and see what happens before any weeping.
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7397158].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author jtchaschowy
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          It's an attempt to keep kids in school - and I don't think it deserves the level of hysteria and projection it's getting.
          Right, let's not change the curriculum, or improve and inovate the ways we are educating our children in this vastly expanding and ever changing technological world where children are not even slightly interested in the archaic methods of teaching schools use.

          Just stick a ******* tracking device on all the little *******s and zap them if they're not on time.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7392288].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jtchaschowy
    If only you had voted for Ron Paul...

    You could have prevented this...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7392247].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author salegurus
    I understand the outrage demonstrated by most people, but isn't that
    what America voted for 3 weeks ago?
    Bigger Government, more handouts, tighter regulation etc... Or am i missing
    the point?
    Signature
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

    ― George Carlin
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7393964].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      Originally Posted by salegurus View Post

      I understand the outrage demonstrated by most people, but isn't that
      what America voted for 3 weeks ago?
      Bigger Government, more handouts, tighter regulation etc... Or am i missing
      the point?
      Yeah you're missing the point.
      Most people didn't vote 3 weeks ago.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7394068].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author salegurus
        Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

        Yeah you're missing the point.
        Most people didn't vote 3 weeks ago.
        Sorry i don't follow? Being a simple man it normally takes me a while...
        Signature
        Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

        ― George Carlin
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7397304].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ThomM
          Originally Posted by salegurus View Post

          Sorry i don't follow? Being a simple man it normally takes me a while...
          Less then 60 % of eligible voters voted in the last election.
          Out of that 60% a little more then half voted for Obama.
          So no, most people didn't vote for Bigger Government, more handouts, tighter regulation etc...
          Signature

          Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
          Getting old ain't for sissy's
          As you are I was, as I am you will be
          You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7399265].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author KimW
      Originally Posted by salegurus View Post

      I understand the outrage demonstrated by most people, but isn't that
      what America voted for 3 weeks ago?
      Bigger Government, more handouts, tighter regulation etc... Or am i missing
      the point?
      I don't know about you,but I certainly didn't vote for any of that.
      Signature

      Read A Post.
      Subscribe to a Newsletter
      KimWinfrey.Com

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7397329].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author MissTerraK
        Originally Posted by KimW View Post

        I don't know about you,but I certainly didn't vote for any of that.
        Neither did I!

        Terra
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7399353].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Atkins
    This is not surprising at all. People don't want liberty, they want
    security. Funny thing is your average person thinks they're the
    same.

    We're not that far from installing chips inside humans. It'll
    probably start with children under the excuse of protection i.e.
    "if your child is kidnapped, we can track him".

    As usual people will swallow it without considering the dangers
    of a system like that.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7394129].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SandraLarkin
    Banned
    It is sickening people will actually support this. It is even more sickening how easily people fall for the "we just want kids to go to school" excuse as well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7395561].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author williambrown
    I think I wouldn't like to use and wear that
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7397842].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Originally Posted by Ken_Caudill View Post

    I suggest the electric shock collars used on dogs. That ought to keep the little darlings on task.

    That really WOULD be a good idea for the scool board members, etc... But I don't think they would vote for that.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7401212].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    So it seems that the school system might not be as Omnipotent as they think they are - looks like they made a mistake thinking people are inventory.

    Setback for the Surveillance State in San Antonio Schools | The Beacon

    When I started investigations in 1985 into a school system strip searching teens for cigarettes (can you imagine the principal eying your 16 yr old daughter up and down while she stood forcibly stripped naked in front of him?) the thing that struck me hardest was one of the Admin's statement "We have more power than the police." Not one of those *******s cared one whit what they did to those kids psychologically - they were getting rushes of the power they had.
    They didn't have it very long.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7401494].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kenmichaels
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      So it seems that the school system might not be as Omnipotent as they think they are - looks like they made a mistake thinking people are inventory.

      Setback for the Surveillance State in San Antonio Schools | The Beacon

      When I started investigations in 1985 into a school system strip searching teens for cigarettes (can you imagine the principal eying your 16 yr old daughter up and down while she stood forcibly stripped naked in front of him?) the thing that struck me hardest was one of the Admin's statement "We have more power than the police." Not one of those *******s cared one whit what they did to those kids psychologically - they were getting rushes of the power they had.
      They didn't have it very long.
      Did you see those numbers ... 815 million to the school

      I have been to san antonio... it was a shit hole.. a blip on the map
      ... a tourist trap ... i was there 10 or 15 years ago.

      815 million... I cant get over it. That seams beyond excessive

      I really hope that's a typo.
      Signature

      Selling Ain't for Sissies!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7401552].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jessie Stevens
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      So it seems that the school system might not be as Omnipotent as they think they are - looks like they made a mistake thinking people are inventory.

      Setback for the Surveillance State in San Antonio Schools | The Beacon

      When I started investigations in 1985 into a school system strip searching teens for cigarettes (can you imagine the principal eying your 16 yr old daughter up and down while she stood forcibly stripped naked in front of him?) the thing that struck me hardest was one of the Admin's statement "We have more power than the police." Not one of those *******s cared one whit what they did to those kids psychologically - they were getting rushes of the power they had.
      They didn't have it very long.
      I've seen the horrible things teachers have done in a classroom. Teachers are now just as bad and sometimes worse than the children. I've seen teachers throw chairs, music stands, pens, pencils, books, erasers, and even a football at the kids in their own classrooms. The above Quote does not shock me at all.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7402112].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author KimW
        Originally Posted by Jessie Stevens View Post

        I've seen the horrible things teachers have done in a classroom. Teachers are now just as bad and sometimes worse than the children. I've seen teachers throw chairs, music stands, pens, pencils, books, erasers, and even a football at the kids in their own classrooms. The above Quote does not shock me at all.
        This is going to be a really unpopular comment, but all you have to do is watch the coaches of any sport broadcast to see where they get the idea that behavior is ok.
        Signature

        Read A Post.
        Subscribe to a Newsletter
        KimWinfrey.Com

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7402121].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
    Once they get that chipping try beat down they need to get rid of the thinking that put that idea forward in the first place.
    Signature

    Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7401926].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SteveJohnson
    What I'm waiting to see is the level of punishment of the kid who figures out how to forge or disable the RFIDs and sells the solution to classmates...

    I'm betting they won't be rewarding his/her inventiveness or entrepreneurial spirit.
    Signature

    The 2nd Amendment, 1789 - The Original Homeland Security.

    Gun control means never having to say, "I missed you."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7403719].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by SteveJohnson View Post

      What I'm waiting to see is the level of punishment of the kid who figures out how to forge or disable the RFIDs and sells the solution to classmates...

      I'm betting they won't be rewarding his/her inventiveness or entrepreneurial spirit.

      They won't get rewarded for brains - it's too easy. Stick it in a microwave. Not enough time for it to melt the badge - just a few seconds. Let cool, jolt it again. Rinse and repeat several times. If the chip is embedded in something metalic, you have to use other means - electricity and magnets is good.

      If our kids can win even school-wide acclaim for solving this simple a problem, then we are in more trouble than we know. Still though - we have to hit this stuff head on instead of just using evasion. Try and stop it at the root. If that doesn't work, THEN we have to know how to evade.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7406195].message }}

Trending Topics