Unchecked antibiotic use in animals may affect global human health

by Alexa Smith Banned
13 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
The increasing production and use of antibiotics, about half of which is used in animal production, is mirrored by the growing number of antibiotic resistance genes, or ARGs, effectively reducing antibiotics' ability to fend off diseases -- in animals and humans.

A study in the current issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows that China -- the world's largest producer and consumer of antibiotics -- and many other countries don't monitor the powerful medicine's usage or impact on the environment.

More here (source): Unchecked antibiotic use in animals may affect global human health

Not altogether "news", I know; but apparently "worsening news"?
#affect #animals #antibiotic #global #health #human #unchecked
  • Profile picture of the author garyv
    Whooping cough is recently making a come-back. It is becoming resistant to vaccines. I wonder if animal antibiotic use may be an underlying cause...

    Whooping cough may be becoming resistant to vaccines
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7734565].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jeff Williams
    We've been having a similar problem in the U.S. with honeybees and the antibiotic tetracycline. Most countries have banned the use of the antibiotic already. However, we seem to think that as long as we "regulate" the use, then we'll be just fine. :confused:

    Honeybees harbor antibiotic-resistance genes
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7735070].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Nicola Lane
    It is not just use in animals that is the problem. there is also a big problem in countries that allow over the counter purchase of antibiotics. when people can just buy a packet of them they treat them like aspirin, and don't finish the course. Also they use antibiotics for a virus . . .

    In a few years we could be seeing things wee thought we had just about beaten coming back again because they are resistant to all current antibiotics.
    Signature

    I like to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7735869].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7736268].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Nicola Lane View Post

      In a few years we could be seeing things we thought we had just about beaten coming back again because they are resistant to all current antibiotics.
      In terms of environmental medicine and epidemiology, I think this is a far more potentially significant issue than almost all the other "stuff widely debated" at the moment. Some of the possible "accidents" could make today's widespread "healthcare delivery issues" look pretty insignificant, by comparison.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7736288].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Hmm - Alexa - Seems you post a tad late for the thanks button yourself, eh?

    We've gone beyond "problem" in the US. Doctors perscribe antibiotics even for things they know antibiotics don't kill - so it's worse than just animal doping. Antibiotics don't touch flu - but there's STILL doctors that will prescribe you bottles of them for it. Many bacterias once affected by them are now immune.

    There is a fight to stop animal doping - that will help, but what concerns me to no end is the amount of drugs now found in our water. They say - well, there's just a little bit - but a little is enough to interact with other things people are taking, and it's enough for some them to accumulate in your body to a dose that WILL do something.

    I would like to beat the snot out of people for taking drugs that aren't absolutely necessary for them - they don't realize that they flush the residual and eventually everyone else is taking their damned drugs, too - whether they want them or not. I'm furious over this issue and never live where there are high populations to stay away from water doping. This is nothing but corruption at it's most toxic.

    Whew - I needed that one.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7736307].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author GoesToEleven
      I found this part of the article to be particularly alarming:

      "Antibiotics in China are weakly regulated, and the country uses four times more antibiotics for veterinary use than in the United States. Since the medicine is poorly absorbed by animals, much of it ends up in manure -- an estimated 700 million tons annually from China alone. This is traditionally spread as fertilizer, sold as compost or ends up downstream in rivers or groundwater, taking ARGs with them. Along with hitching rides in fertilizer, ARGs also are spread via international trade, immigration and recreational travel."

      So the Antibiotic Resistant Genes (ARGs) are internationally mobile. Enforcing improved waste management seems urgent but unlikely, even if the ARG's were classified as "pollutants" as suggested. So, stemming the root cause - toxifying our animals with antibiotics, is the highest probability solution path? Damn, Big Pharma will not like that ...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7736358].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeTucker
    Another example of too much money and politics in politics,
    and not enough science.
    Signature

    The bartender says: "We don't serve faster-than-light particles here."

    ...A tachyon enters a bar.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7737108].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
      I wonder if there is an upside? The Western World has not seen a large scale killer-flu pandemic since 1918'ish.

      Video: Killer Flu | Watch Secrets of the Dead Online | PBS Video

      Joe Mobley
      Signature

      .

      Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7737184].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

        I wonder if there is an upside? The Western World has not seen a large scale killer-flu pandemic since 1918'ish.

        Video: Killer Flu | Watch Secrets of the Dead Online | PBS Video

        Joe Mobley
        Antibiotics have not one thing to do with Virus - they kill bacterias.

        What killed most people in the 1918 flu epidemic was not flu - it was the advent of aspirin. Most people that die "of flu" actually die of complications such as pneumonia. Pneumonia is caused by fluid in the lungs, both a hazard of flu itself -- and also a hazard of aspirin. Everyone was fed aspirin in that epidemic because it was new and they didn't realize that it would increase water in the lungs. oops, huh?

        Considering how easily Vitamin D3 and C kill flu virus, I'm still not clear why they just don't prescribe a bag of oranges and a lizard lamp.
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7738099].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Joe Mobley
          Really???

          50 million people died within 3 days of getting the flu because of aspirin?

          Really?

          Everyone was fed aspirin in that epidemic...
          Everyone? Everybody around the world got the new aspirin?

          The stuff you come up with.

          Joe Mobley




          Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

          What killed most people in the 1918 flu epidemic was not flu - it was the advent of aspirin...
          Signature

          .

          Follow Me on Twitter: @daVinciJoe
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7738297].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author MikeTucker
            Originally Posted by Joe Mobley View Post

            Really???

            50 million people died within 3 days of getting the flu because of aspirin?

            Really?



            Everyone? Everybody around the world got the new aspirin?

            The stuff you come up with.

            Joe Mobley

            Yeah Sal, quit making all this stuff up!!!
            Signature

            The bartender says: "We don't serve faster-than-light particles here."

            ...A tachyon enters a bar.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7738851].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PvPGuy
    Bigger, better, faster, cheaper paradigm that has driven the chemical agricultural model is far beyond broken; many good documentaries that have covered this and related issues over the last several years. The argument at its root is chemicals vs. natural models.

    Something interesting to consider. While most of us assume vaccines helped rid us of many diseases that used to kill so many, its not true in the sense we think it is. In fact, you can track the decline of many of these diseases with the improvement and proliferation of farming technology, all before vaccines became common. Better food = less disease.

    The paradigm that helped bring civilization to better health, like most paradigms, exceeded its capacity, and now many are nutritionally deficient again in spite of the unprecedented access to "food." Only this time, its not just a lack of quality foods, its the addition of environmental toxins, chemicals in almost all food that is packaged, and of course, the myriad of antibiotics we are exposed to through the animals we eat.

    Vote with your food dollars!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7740503].message }}

Trending Topics