Steven Wagenheim Banned?

59 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Unless I'm seeing things, is it true that Steven Wagenheim is banned from the forum? Anyone know why?

He always seemed to be a helpful person and good source of info on the forum. I'm shocked.

Mike
  • Profile picture of the author MichaelHiles
    Well, as much as I might have disagreed with him over the MJ issue, I certainly hope that the mods or admins reconsider if this is the case.

    Sometimes people just have bad days.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920925].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author derekwong28
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920936].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Ken Strong
      I have no idea what's going on with Steven (if anything), but I've noticed quite a few Warriors have been banned temporarily (like a week or so) for fairly minor offenses... kind of like the time-outs we give our 3-year old daughter when she misbehaves

      If he has been banned, he'll most likely be back soon.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920940].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Trader54
        Originally Posted by KenStrong View Post

        I have no idea what's going on with Steven (if anything), but I've noticed quite a few Warriors have been banned temporarily (like a week or so) for fairly minor offenses... kind of like the time-outs we give our 3-year old daughter when she misbehaves

        If he has been banned, he'll most likely be back soon.
        Yeah I thought the same, it would be a temporary thing.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920946].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ThomM
        You guys don't think the 8 infractions for insulting other members had anything to do with it?
        Not condoning the infractions by the way, just pointing it out.
        Signature

        Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
        Getting old ain't for sissy's
        As you are I was, as I am you will be
        You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920960].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michael Ellis
          Originally Posted by ThomM View Post

          You guys don't think the 8 infractions for insulting other members had anything to do with it?
          Not condoning the infractions by the way, just pointing it out.
          Yea, I saw that... 7 of those were from last year. Not sure if they expire, or what that even means, or what value that has. Heck, someone gave me an infraction because I never got an infraction before... and that's still my only infraction. lol
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920974].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author ThomM
            Originally Posted by Michael Ellis View Post

            Yea, I saw that... 7 of those were from last year. Not sure if they expire, or what that even means, or what value that has. Heck, someone gave me an infraction because I never got an infraction before... and that's still my only infraction. lol
            I didn't notice the dates on them Mike, so that might not be it.
            Maybe it was his thread here that got locked.
            I don't know really.
            Signature

            Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
            Getting old ain't for sissy's
            As you are I was, as I am you will be
            You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920995].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author derekwong28
    It looks like a real ban, you cannot send pm's to him. I hope he will not take it that badly. By the way Ken, can any moderator ban a member?
    Signature

    Do not get between a wombat and a chocolate biscuit; you will regret it dearly!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920952].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author derekwong28
    If it was that thread, I would have thought it was the title of the thread rather than the actual contents of his posts.
    Signature

    Do not get between a wombat and a chocolate biscuit; you will regret it dearly!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921010].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thatgirlJ
    Wow I hope it's just temporary.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921013].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Well, some members DESERVE to be insulted. If allen is smart, he will weigh everything. Some jerk that ONLY insults, ccomplains, etc... and just got on the system is FAR worse that one that is blunt and rude but helps and has a history.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921017].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MichaelHiles
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      Well, some members DESERVE to be insulted. If allen is smart, he will weigh everything. Some jerk that ONLY insults, ccomplains, etc... and just got on the system is FAR worse that one that is blunt and rude but helps and has a history.

      Steve

      Wow.

      Are you referencing me with your statement?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921060].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by MichaelHiles View Post

        Wow.

        Are you referencing me with your statement?

        I don't know you well enough to judge. NOPE, I wasn't singling anyone out.

        SOME might say that I am an example of the worst, but I am not. I have helped people, etc.... HECK, I would have a LOT more thanks if they had that feature when I first came here. So nope, I wasn't refering to any paarticular person, and certainly not just ONE person.

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921089].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MichaelHiles
          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

          I don't know you well enough to judge. NOPE, I wasn't singling anyone out.

          SOME might say that I am an example of the worst, but I am not. I have helped people, etc.... HECK, I would have a LOT more thanks if they had that feature when I first came here. So nope, I wasn't refering to any paarticular person, and certainly not just ONE person.

          Steve
          Cool.

          I've tried to be helpful as well. Sure, like anyone else, I have an opinion. I'm entitled to it, and I am pretty good at defending it because I generally don't express one unless I have some actual tangible basis for it besides, "I happen to feel that way and have decided to agree with myself." I don't even have to resort to character attacks, namecalling, and passive aggressive insinuations like, "are you having a bad life?" But I also realize that there exists a massive population of people who are so criss crossed with scrambled emotions and broken control systems, that people just react and lash out at whatever may stimulate them on the surface.

          Even so, I am the kind of person who recognizes that people who have positions on things that I might disagree with, still have value and something to contribute... just like Steve W.

          If you'll notice, I asked you to clarify your statements instead of making an assumption and charging down the road.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921098].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TimPhelan
            This guy was just banned also: DLWEBB610. He was posting negative stuff about Obama which explains his banning I guess.

            Yeh, I'm sure Steven's is just temporary.
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921111].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author HeySal
        Originally Posted by MichaelHiles View Post

        Wow.

        Are you referencing me with your statement?
        IF you feel suspect when you read such statements - you might want to
        take a look at that signal - whether or not it was referring to you.

        I don't think that Steve will be gone long - but he should pay attention to this one - while he offers some extremely valuable info but he has quite a controlling nature. When political discussions were allowed in the OT, he wasn't even a regular OTer - but didn't like what others wanted to talk about so complained to Allen. I actually have quit reading most of his posts because he complains about the others in here way too often.

        We had another warrior in here when I started here that was very prominent - had more posts that almost anyone else - but she decided that she ruled the forum and started railing at admin any time anyone didn't like her position on an issue, etc. People were shocked when Allen booted her, too, but it never hurt the forum any to have her gone.

        We aren't here to control each other's views whether we like them or not. We need to leave that to the fascists in Gov who are trying to ban free speech. If we can't be honest - how do we learn? Okay, someone thinks MJ was a pedafile and someone else doesn't -- discussion is the only way to understand each other, and the only way we can learn more about our fellow membership, which is made up of real people behind the usernames, emails, etc.

        How do you know how to JV with if they have to keep their true feelings and positions private? My JV partners come from the OT because I know that we have common grounds and will get along and can work together.

        What about people who want to sell MJ products -- isn't it good for them to see how people really feel and what percentage feel that way?

        I sell a natural beauty product....Isn't it conducive for me to know all points of view on the Issue of CODEX?

        If we are going to exist as a community - we can't run and tattle every time someone doesn't agree with us or offends us. The smart people are learning from these posts rather than complaining about how many do not share our views.

        I am sure Steve will be back -- but I also think that an attitude agjustment was timely.
        Signature

        Sal
        When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
        Beyond the Path

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921121].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MichaelHiles
          Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

          IF you feel suspect when you read such statements - you might want to
          take a look at that signal - whether or not it was referring to you.
          I don't "feel" anything.

          With all the passive aggressive insinuations and "drive by shootings" that are pretty common among some regular members of this forum, I find it a better strategy to just force people to clarify their generalizations instead of reacting to something that I may be misinterpreting.

          Don't you think that is a better strategy than say, reading an entire book into something and charging down the road?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921148].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author HeySal
            Originally Posted by MichaelHiles View Post

            I don't "feel" anything.

            With all the passive aggressive insinuations and "drive by shootings" that are pretty common among some regular members of this forum, I find it a better strategy to just force people to clarify their generalizations instead of reacting to something that I may be misinterpreting.

            Don't you think that is a better strategy than say, reading an entire book into something and charging down the road?
            I completely "get it". More or less just a statement of truth. When I see people bashing me (uh...yep, I get that sometimes too) and then see another post that sounds like it is aimed at me -- I just stop for a minute and think about whether I have said something out of line with reality. I rarely change my mind about what I have said -- but do once in awhile.
            It never hurts to stop and look at ourselves sometimes.

            If you said something you TRULY believe, and believe despite seeing what others think and all the facts available you have absolutely nothing to apologize for in holding that opinion no matter how strong it is or who objects. I have actually been told to "go to hell" in this forum. It bothered others, but I couldn't have cared less. The man was absolutely foaming at the mouth angry at my point of view - so what? That's his right. I don't change my positions on issues or hide just to make others more comfortable. I don't trust people who do. And I most certainly don't like people telling me I have no right to state my opinions because they aren't in agreement with or supportive of someone else.

            All I was saying is that if you feel a post is aimed at you because of something you said elsewhere or feel - it MAY be something you want to at least give a fleeting bit of attention to. Seems you already did that. Good boy. You're views might not all be palatable to some others, but your reputation will be one of honesty.
            Signature

            Sal
            When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
            Beyond the Path

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921223].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Michael Ellis
              Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

              I have actually been told to "go to hell" in this forum.
              You mean some no good SOB said that to you?!? If I find him I'm going to...

              Well, it's been a while and it looks like that's still weighing on your mind.

              (In case anyone is wondering, I was the SOB.)

              Sal, look, things got heated during a time when politics were allowed to be discussed here. Things were thrown around on both sides, from multiple people. I let the heat of the topic get to me, and I shouldn't have.

              I'm sorry for my comment, so let's shake hands, alright?

              Mike
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921276].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Gene Pimentel
    Steven provides a WHOLE lot more value than most Warriors. If he was banned for insulting a few people (who probably deserved it), this is ridiculous. I hope the mods will not only look at infractions, but will weigh them against the VALUE he provides.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921028].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    Steven Wagenheims most recent tweets

    "Read about my current Warrior Forum ban and how forum rules apply to everybody... Internet Marketing Tips - Forum Rules Apply To Everybody | Steve Wagenheim's Home Business Blog"

    17 minutes ago
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921210].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    I admire Wags myself. I am having survivor's guilt syndrome right now. There were a few people who said really offensive things and all day I was biting my tongue - don't say it don't say it don't say it; shuddup self shuddup self shuddup self...

    I was glad that Wags did address them, but now he is toast, at least temporarily. Toward the end there he was 'fighting mad' and maybe that was what did it -

    "Freedom is not License" -
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921582].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    Looking at the other thread it's probably cause he called everyone a bunch of dicks.

    You can be the most wonderful person in the world, the smartest, have a billion posts, a billion thanks, whatever, doesn't give you a right to insult and bash others, especially making a thread specifically for that. And it's not the first time this has happened either. I have a pretty good memory and remember other posts like this.

    This is admin's home, he pays the bills, and if anyone doesn't go by his rules he can ban anyone he wants. Just like the saying, under my roof my rules.

    If he just ignored the people he didn't like instead of making another thread just to point out he doesn't like them and call em dicks, he wouldn't have been banned. If I made a post everytime I found out I didn't like someone, I'd be making posts all the time saying who I didn't like. But I prefer the ignore em method.

    Even Steve will admit he takes things too personally and gets too hot headed over the most minor things and has been told to take a break many times by many old time warriors. Maybe the break will help him cool off. Just like Sal said, he's the one who got politics and religious topics banned when he wasn't even involved in them or barely in the ot. He just decided HE didn't like them so they should be banned and complained to admin.

    And he's not being singled out, if any oldie warrior member made a post to say I don't like you people and you all are dicks they'd be banned too. Like he said rules apply to oldies as well as newbies.

    But don't worry, he'll be back in a week.
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921785].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Marcus91
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921997].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      But I'm sure other people have done just as bad or worse in their posts, yet never were banned, so the rules are not being applied evenly. Appears someone has their favorites.
      It appears you don't have a clue.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[922040].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        [DELETED]
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[922076].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Tina Golden
          [DELETED]
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[922126].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Kay King
            He was posting negative stuff about Obama which explains his banning I guess.
            Not sure, Tim - he was posting videos (sig) on a site he doesn't own which were conspiracy videos about 911. He may have posted comments as well - but that was one reason he got attention.

            This isn't a political forum - there are rules which should be read - and people who just joined have no idea what's going on which usually means they didn't just join.

            Steven showed a lot of class about this - it's great to see his positive attitude about his one week "vacation"!

            kay
            Signature
            Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
            ***
            One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
            what it is instead of what you think it should be.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[922258].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
              Steve (seasoned),

              I agree. You'd have at least several thousand "thank yous" if they'd had that feature earlier, that's for sure. And probably a whole lot of infractions, too. (I don't want to think how many infractions I'd have gotten back in the day. )

              In general,

              According to the post on his blog, it's a week off.

              I haven't hung out in OT for a long time. Started a little in the past few weeks. Based on what I've read in here in that time, I think a whole lot of people are just as deserving of some time off, but simply didn't use the kind of nasty language that SW did in a recent thread.

              Honestly, the polarization in here is nasty enough to rival a debate involving Michael Moore, Anne Coulter and Ayatollah Khamenei. Reminds me why I stopped reading this section.

              That sort of hostility encourages escalation, which leads to the sort of extreme language that can get you banned even with a track record of helpfulness. It's also just plain unproductive.

              As far as which moderators can ban someone, that depends on how Allen's got things set up. vBulletin can be pretty granular if you want it to be.

              Infractions don't mean much, except that someone is annoyed by something you did. You know... Like not having gotten any infractions.

              amki,

              Thank you. That post showed pure class.

              Post more often.

              Markus91,

              The rules are never applied evenly. One hopes, rather, that they are applied fairly, which is a very different thing.

              Example: Without commenting on whether I think Steven's banning was right or not (not my call to question), I can safely say that he and I and a lot of others have gotten more leeway than someone would who'd been here for much less time, and who'd given much less to the forum.

              That is both uneven and fair.

              I can assure you, though, that there are lines none of us can cross with impunity. In that regard, Steven's comments are dead spot on. The rules do apply to everyone.


              Paul
              Signature
              .
              Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[922454].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                First,

                Yeah, I would have had infractions also. ESPECIALLY since I said some unpopular things, and some were misunderstood. Still, some people come here ONLY to advertise and/or cause trouble. THEY should not really be tolerated. The sad part is that this stuff was done MOSTLY for THEM! Still, you can't be 100% loved, so there should be tolerance elsewhere.

                From what I have heard about what steven did, I agree that he should have been banned, or similar, TEMPORARILY.

                steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[923164].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Asher
              Ah, okay, this thread answers a lot of the questions I've had about
              some people getting banned from the forum... but I do look forward
              to his return.

              Originally Posted by rtrotter View Post

              ... I really like the character of the person reflected in that post.
              I second that.

              Originally Posted by Patrician View Post

              I admire Wags myself. I am having survivor's guilt syndrome right now. There were a few people who said really offensive things and all day I was biting my tongue - don't say it don't say it don't say it; shuddup self shuddup self shuddup self...

              I was glad that Wags did address them, but now he is toast, at least temporarily. Toward the end there he was 'fighting mad' and maybe that was what did it -

              "Freedom is not License" -
              I wouldn't have worded it like Steven (mainly because I don't know
              how to) but I think it takes a certain amount of courage (or
              otherwise) to voice out one's opinions like that. Like you, I was
              doing the "don't say it don't say it don't say it; shuddup self shuddup
              self shuddup self" ritual. :p

              Asher
              Signature
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[922774].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author gareth
    Yeah steven is a good guy - I hope he takes it with a grain of salt.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[923183].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author aniebee
    I just wanted to say "thanks" for posting this thread. I like Steven & his different take on how to succeed.

    This way I don't have to speculate. This is the second "seasoned" warrior, if you will, that I've seen "banned." Glad to know that it's temporary
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[923378].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TLTheLiberator
    I'll certainly miss his insightful threads and posts.

    TL
    Signature

    "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. -- Mark Twain

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[923404].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Bruce NewMedia
    This a day for surprises...at least for me.

    I boot my computer this morning and first learn that TV pitchman Billy Mays is dead. (I watched 4 of his "Pitchmen" episodes just last nite!
    Then I wander over here and learn that one of the most generous posters on this entire forum has been banned. ... and of course, the other day Michael Jackson is found dead.

    Now, if somebody announces that Elvis has actually been found alive, its all over for me :-)
    _____
    Bruce
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[923902].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom B
      Banned
      Some people can take things too personally on these forum. Especially when they spend a lot of time here. I know I am one of those types and need to take breaks from posting. I can still visit but sometimes I stop my postings until I am in the correct frame of mind.

      It is rather interesting how I and others react to postings of forums like this. Strange if you ask me but still a reality to some.

      I think time away will help Steven. I know it helps me when I get stressed out and start "acting out" on this or other forums.

      It isn't a normal behavior, for Steven, and most of us realize it.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[923985].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ExRat
        Hi Waggers,

        Nice to know we're still thinking and talking about you while you take a vacation, eh?

        Keep smiling over there in the sin-bin/on the naughty-step mate
        Signature


        Roger Davis

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[924214].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pavondunbar
    I sincerely hope he comes back to this forum.

    Steven is a wonderful guy...someone I looked up to on this forum.

    His posts and his blog are both helpful.

    Pavon
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[929168].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Emily Meeks
    As far as I know, Steve's one of the few Warrior members who has his very own thread

    I haven't talked to him as much as I'd like to (yet) but he seems like a really great guy. I'm glad the ban's only temporary 8)
    Signature

    In all that you do, know your True INTENT...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[929233].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Harvey Segal
      You know ... it's possible that this has all been one huge mistake.

      There are many members here with the name Richard.

      That's why Steve said there's a whole bunch of dicks on the forum.

      Harvey




      .
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[929420].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author garyv
    To me Steven is like the old War veteran uncle at the family reunion. He may get a bit colorful with is language and emotions, and may even call you an idiot. But you know who he is, and that he's fought for his right to be that way - so you LET him be that way. Now if it was your cousin Vinny's new girlfriend Roxanne getting colorful and calling you an idiot that's a different story - BUT we all know who Steven Wagenheim is, and if he gets under your skin, then I'm with VegasVince on this one... You need to get a thicker skin.

    I'm glad to hear that it's only a temporary ban (although everyone - especially moderators - should know Steven by now and know his quirky behaviors, and should know to give him the leeway that his veteran status has afforded him.) If this had been a permanent ban on him, I'd be out of here with him. That kind of censorship is a bit scary - and a lot disrespectful in my opinion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930186].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    Giving a person the boot for calling people 'di*ks' is fair. Quirky vet or whatever...rules are rules. They apply to everyone, regardless of their post count.

    When you start calling people names, people get mad and tell other people. Then sooner or later, nobody is coming around because they dont want to be called a d**k by the quirky veteran. When people dont come around, wso's dont get bought, warroom memberships dont get purchased, in other words, the site doesnt make money.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930252].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author garyv
      Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

      Giving a person the boot for calling people 'di*ks' is fair. Quirky vet or whatever...rules are rules. They apply to everyone, regardless of their post count.

      When you start calling people names, people get mad and tell other people. Then sooner or later, nobody is coming around because they dont want to be called a d**k by the quirky veteran. When people dont come around, wso's dont get bought, warroom memberships dont get purchased, in other words, the site doesnt make money.
      First of all - If you've been on this forum for any amount of time, you know that Steven doesn't sit around all day calling people d**ks. And if you paid attention and acted on half of his posts, you'd probably be rich by now. And another thing, on occasion he does get emotional. However if Steven Wagenheim calls you a d**k and you get upset and leave the forum, then there's a good chance you won't make it in this business anyway, and shouldn't be here in the first place.

      Man, those "quirky veterans" always have gems of knowledge they are sharing. If you get hung up on the language, or don't have a thick enough skin for the delivery, then you're only hurting yourself.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930353].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alan Petersen
        I'm glad Steve's ban is only temporary and it's great to see how he's taking this ban and learning from it vs. getting all bent.

        I've seen others banned who go out and setup anti-WF sites/blogs vs. trying to learn from the incident.

        I personally don't go into the off-topic forum much. I know I don't have as thick of skin as I should have for some of those posts so I stay out. Life is too short to get all upset over really something pretty silly.

        It's also a weird nature of the best in this forum world that a thread about Michael Jackson of all things can lead to arguments, insults, and bans. I didn't read the thread in question but looks like people need to cut to decaff coffee.

        I'm sitting in the lobby of the Mayo clinic as my Mother is getting ready for surgery next week (eye cataracts nothing too serious) and seeing all these sick people here really puts things in perspective. So if you think you're having a bad day and you're healthy go sit in the lobby of a hospital for an hour.
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930503].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
        Originally Posted by garyv View Post

        First of all - If you've been on this forum for any amount of time, you know that Steven doesn't sit around all day calling people d**ks. And if you paid attention and acted on half of his posts, you'd probably be rich by now. And another thing, on occasion he does get emotional. However if Steven Wagenheim calls you a d**k and you get upset and leave the forum, then there's a good chance you won't make it in this business anyway, and shouldn't be here in the first place.

        Man, those "quirky veterans" always have gems of knowledge they are sharing. If you get hung up on the language, or don't have a thick enough skin for the delivery, then you're only hurting yourself.
        Steve W. isn't special to this forum. He's a great source of help for many warriors, but that doesn't give him free reign to call people names.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930510].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author garyv
          Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

          Steve W. isn't special to this forum. He's a great source of help for many warriors, but that doesn't give him free reign to call people names.
          Personally I think that he is special to this forum. He's one of the biggest personalities in this forum and helps to make it what it is. Should he be calling people d**ks all of the time? No - and that's not what he does.

          To me some of the vets in here are like a big family. You wouldn't kick Uncle Joe to the curb because he called you a name in a heated argument. You'd let him cool down, confront him, and let him apologize. So far Steven has handled this as the real gentleman he is. However I'll never agree that banning him is a good thing. A temporary suspension may be good to let things cool down, but banning Steven Wagenheim from the Warrior forum for being slightly offensive would be like banning Dennis Rodman from your basketball team because he has an offensive tattoo. The guy can be rough around the edges, but you accept that, because he gets the job done.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930719].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
            Here's my take on Waggers vacation...

            He'll come back a little older and a lot wiser. It's the nature of self inflicted wounds, and he understands that.

            I'm betting his skin will be a nanometer thicker, as well.

            And that will be a good thing. It's almost painful to see someone self-destruct over trivial matters, and that has been a repetitious cycle with Steve.

            I will admit I will be glad when the ban is over. All drama aside, he does a lot to raise the IQ of this forum. And that's something we all benefit from.

            KJ
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930894].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
            Originally Posted by garyv View Post

            Personally I think that he is special to this forum. He's one of the biggest personalities in this forum and helps to make it what it is. Should he be calling people d**ks all of the time? No - and that's not what he does.

            To me some of the vets in here are like a big family. You wouldn't kick Uncle Joe to the curb because he called you a name in a heated argument. You'd let him cool down, confront him, and let him apologize. So far Steven has handled this as the real gentleman he is. However I'll never agree that banning him is a good thing. A temporary suspension may be good to let things cool down, but banning Steven Wagenheim from the Warrior forum for being slightly offensive would be like banning Dennis Rodman from your basketball team because he has an offensive tattoo. The guy can be rough around the edges, but you accept that, because he gets the job done.
            No..you dont accept that.

            So you dont mind if someone is spitting in your face as long as they are telling you something useful?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930968].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author garyv
              Originally Posted by Michael Motley View Post

              No..you dont accept that.

              So you dont mind if someone is spitting in your face as long as they are telling you something useful?
              This is an online forum - No one is spitting in your face. If you don't like what he's saying ignore him. I hate public censorship - If you don't like it, ignore it, but don't decide for the rest of us. Most of us are adults here and can handle what Steven dishes out.

              Steven is one of the softest guys on the planet - If you can't handle the Wagmeister, then you're definitely in the wrong business.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[931058].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
                Originally Posted by garyv View Post

                This is an online forum - No one is spitting in your face. If you don't like what he's saying ignore him. I hate public censorship - If you don't like it, ignore it, but don't decide for the rest of us. Most of us are adults here and can handle what Steven dishes out.

                Steven is one of the softest guys on the planet - If you can't handle the Wagmeister, then you're definitely in the wrong business.
                Originally Posted by Steve Wagenheim;

                All I know is that it's a shame that a thread that was started simply to pay
                tribute to a person who, if nothing else, was a big part of pop music culture
                had to be closed because some people have to act like a bunch of dicks.

                That's right, you're a bunch of dicks.

                And if you want to give me some sh*t for that remark, bring it on because
                you ain't seen nothing yet.
                .
                You're right, this is an online forum similar to being out in public. If you called someone a name in public, you'll probalby get dealt with. Well, he got dealt with. If he can't mingle with the public without reverting to middleschool, maybe he's in the wrong business

                And I personally didnt decide anything...the owners of the forum did.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[931073].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ThomM
        Originally Posted by garyv View Post

        First of all - If you've been on this forum for any amount of time, you know that Steven doesn't sit around all day calling people d**ks. And if you paid attention and acted on half of his posts, you'd probably be rich by now. And another thing, on occasion he does get emotional. However if Steven Wagenheim calls you a d**k and you get upset and leave the forum, then there's a good chance you won't make it in this business anyway, and shouldn't be here in the first place.

        Man, those "quirky veterans" always have gems of knowledge they are sharing. If you get hung up on the language, or don't have a thick enough skin for the delivery, then you're only hurting yourself.
        If he did sit around all day calling people dicks he would of been gone a long time ago and you know it.
        Second this forum was around for a long time before Steve showed up and did just fine.
        Now I like Steve and yes he has gone out of his way to help people.
        On the other hand he has done some things here that flat pissed me off to the point where I was seeing red. Yet I didn't call him names or cop a forum attitude about it. I held my tongue and when he posted something I liked I commented about it.
        The guy got a week off for calling people something he had done in the past himself, get over it.
        Signature

        Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
        Getting old ain't for sissy's
        As you are I was, as I am you will be
        You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[931079].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tyrus Antas
    This thread proves that, once again, INTERNET = SERIOUS BUSINESS.

    internet serious business - Google Image Search

    Tyrus
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[930564].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MichaelHiles
    His comment certainly didn't bother me.

    I thought it was done and over with, then I saw he was banned later on.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[931090].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    It didnt bother me one way or the other. I've said worse and definately heard worse. But like i said, on a forum that actually makes money from people wanting to come here, any forum member who's attacking others with colorful language tends to run off paying customers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[931100].message }}

Trending Topics