The Bosnian Pyramids.

by 50 replies
61
More Evidence that Tesla was right...

The Lost Pyramids Of Bosnia - Sam Osmanagich PhD - YouTube
#off topic forum
  • Interesting. I saw a video when they first discovered the pyramid and were just getting around to proving that it wasn't a natural mountain. Of course, got called a "conspiracy threorist, and nutcase" for believing they had something. Now it's been proven real, I want to find out more about what all they've found. Thanks for the heads up on the progress they've made with it.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    Levitation & endless power supply?
    • [2] replies
  • Pyramids are being found all over the world in the most unexpected places. I am glad this is coming out!
  • oh yeah they had a discovery special on this the other day right? I dvr'd it and will watch it tonight
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Call me naive, but after all the geological and other scientists who have proven that the so-called "Bosnian pyramids" are natural formations, without any genuine sign or even suspicion of human construction, and after so many archaeologists have irrefutably exposed all Osmanagić's so-called "discoveries" there as a complete fraud and a hoax (as even some of his own former supporters have now openly admitted), I really didn't imagine that there were still people who believe these are "pyramids".

      I should have known better.

      Feature: British Archaeology 92, January/February 2007

      .
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [4] replies
  • Banned
    Lol at the levitation.

    Magnets are fun but a 1/4" of levitation isn't doing much of anything for anyone.

    The endless power claim is nonsense. Looks like someone has been watching Under the Dome.
  • Banned
    Notice how the guy in the OP video thumbs through his book pointing out obvious pyramids & skimps on his own claim in the book.

    That's an old sales technique that associates your own product with proven/authority names/products to help generate sales.
  • Okay - first off, this guy isn't "ameteur". His Ph.D thesis was on Mayan civilization.

    Second - I read what the Smithsonian and Nat'l Geo both had to say back about 8 years ago about the findings. They were non comittal. They pointed out there were skeptics, but never said anything such that the pyramids were a hoax.
    I busted out 2 world premere stories on the newsletters I used to write because the people were getting jacked the the "Smithandweston" institute. One was the first pictures of the largest crystals on earth. You can see my newsletter archives on that if you want, I'll look the page up and give you the link. Second was the news of the H3Tech tricorder. Smithsonian didn't get that one at all - I got it, a month later Nat'l Geo got it - and then the military got the contract. Nobody of any real repute deals with the Smithsonian. Archaeological mafia. When I see the first "news" coming from them, I always wonder what the poor discoverer was threatened with. And still - they were noncommital. This says something to me.

    Second - this guy had help from the Bosnian Gov. He had enough proof for them to take interest. He's had hundreds, maybe thousands of volunteers, too. They've uncovered a good stretch of tunnels now, and blocks - and a complex. This isn't the hoax that some demented clique wanted us to believe it was. They've gained a lot of ground over the last few years, and they've had cooperation from a lot of professionals around the world now. That's one thing to understand. Scientists run in cliques and will gang up on other scientists and cliques. It doesn't mean much at the end of the day.

    I was not impressed with Robert Schoch's (Robert Milton Schoch, Associate Professor of Natural Sciences at the College of General Studies, a two-year non-degree-granting unit of Boston University) yelling about the pyramids being fake. He's not seemingly any type of field expert or expert on ancient architecture, or anything to do with anything that would give him expertise on the subject. He's just an academic blowhard with a big mouth and solid "opinions". It's he and his little clique that's screaming about a hoax. I read some of his comments and he seems completely confused about what an excavation site looks like and a few other facts about ancient architecture and archaeology. I was not impressed. I am impressed with the data of Dr. Amer Smailbegovic (PhD geophysics).

    Here's the Dr's report. Please note - "remote sensing" does not mean any form of telepathy - it is technological equipment.(just for people who wig at the term thinking it is talking metaphysics).

    http://www.bosnianpyramid.com/PDFS/G...20Analysis.pdf

    Carbon dating is being used: This one, I believe was from the pyramid of the moon - a smaller pyramid than the sun. There are 3 in the complex.

    That's it for tonight - the sun's coming up. I'm going to be watching a series of videos tomorrow sometime to watch the work going on now and see what looks good and what looks like wishful thinking.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
  • Funny - I know a lot of archaeologists who don't call this a hoax, and never saw any of those involved in this discovery "admit" that it's a hoax. I've seen rock uncovered on the smaller of the pyramids that I can tell is NOT natural rock -- and there's a lot of rock out there that is natural that doesn't look it at all. I know Schoch's group and they're assholes. I wouldn't call one of them "reputed".

    I can't say 100% anything about the Pyramid of the Sun. But that terrace they uncovered on the Pyramid of the moon is man-made. Now the question is - is the whole pyramid a man made structure, or just a pyramid shaped mountain that humans inhabited and built on. If that is what it turns out to be, it's still worth uncovering.

    The truth is that they have excavated some real tunnels. The truth is that they have uncovered a few man-made terraces. In my book, that's archaeology's job to do that. The thesis this scientist has is that the whole mt is man-made. He may or may not prove that yet. Those terraces on their own deserve a little more excavation to find out what exactly is going on there. From what I've seen, this can go either way. There's some very curious factors about some of the features and how they're showing up on scientific equipment. I'd like to see Chuck get one of his H3Tech tricorders on that thing and see what kind of readings he gets - both atomic signature and land feature readings.
    • [1] reply
    • Ahhh so here we are again, but at least this time it's not about the intangibility of the occult, life after death ghosts, or the elusive ufo's. They rely on a few pics, tons of anecdotal stories. Nothing for the hard science types to get there teeth into, just to dismiss and not really be challenged.

      But here is another story. It's not all Houdini, Doyle, smoke and mirrors stuff. Physical structures that can be looked at, examined, scrutinized etc. There are ways of finding out with 100 percent certainty if they are man made or natural. I have not looked at the video as in this particular case is, it is either a man made structure or a natural one and If you really want to prove it either way just get a top team out there of unbiased experts and either put it to bed completely as false or prove it to be true. Just put this one to bed.

      I want to talk about one thing really, motives. If you had asked me 25 years ago if the governments/powers that be of the world were underhand and were covering things up in what they were presenting to us and teaching us as to the history of the world (with us in the equation), the science of the world, what we were using to power the world and many other topics I would have said are you crazy, what have they to gain in holding things back that would further our understanding of ourselves, our origins, our scientific discoveries etc. It is for the common good that anything new be shared so we can better ourselves. It's only logical.

      Ask me that question now, to say the least, I'm not so sure. And I am dis-guarding all sensationalism, conspiracy theories and wishful thinking. There are too many anomalies with archeology for a start. However, lets just take one as an example.

      I may be way off with my figures but lets say the Egyptian Sphinx is 5000 years old and so the Egyptian culture/civilisation. That's the accepted view. World history is set.

      A few years ago a man from a different scientific (non archeologist but a scientist in his particular field) background goes to look at the Sphinx. He looks at the base and immediately see's obvious, plain as the nose on your face, signs of weathering by water. Why, because that's his field. That means it was built twice as long ago as the accepted view. That makes the civilization twice as old. He knows this because 10,000 years ago the area had much more rain and flooding, the Nile was wider. He knows about the history books however so takes pictures and masks off what is above the base and takes it to a learnered scholar who knows his field and also is a respected archeologist. He says what caused that? Oh, it's obviously weathering by water of course. He then reveals the whole picture. The guy clams up and no longer wants to discuss it.

      Do you realize what just happened, undeniable proof that the technology and building prowess and existence of a civilization has just been proved to be twice as old as it is accepted to be. Yet, is it in the current history books now, no, Why! It turns accepted history on it's head, it makes the possibility of many other accepted views of history and their timescales obsolete, just plain wrong. But no, brushed under the carpet. The world view is right, despite the anomalies, and we are sticking to it.

      If just that one anomaly was compared in it's significance to the Theory of Relativity or Quantum Physics for example having a similar Hole then Albert Eisenstein would just be a bad haired German guy who came up with a flawed theory. It just would not wash.

      It seems to me that up until to the last 40-50 years ago we have been making discoveries and sharing them, challenging them etc, and then, suddenly a slow down in information and clamming up. Lets just set this in stone, we like what we have, we will keep our history books. We are using oil to power the world and the world economy revolves around it. Let's just maintain the status quo of it all for now. We will keep the discovories secret until we feel it is right to reveal them.

      I think this phenomenon is very real in the world today.

      I'm afraid, that's the message I'm getting.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Ah - so someone is knowledgeable about geologists and their expertise in achaeological matters.

    The sphinx has been proven much older than info given to us. After this geologist gave proof, he didn't just clam up because he felt like it. Scientific permits started to be denied to anyone of any professional level wanting to study that area.

    We - those of us who actually follow the science closely instead of the media already know that they had Electric lighting of some sort back then. It's right in the hieroglyphics, not just some conspiracy theory. Batteries from that era are on display in museums for cripes sakes. The pyramids are known to be power generators, but they were closed down to study - why?

    Our geo-petrol economic system collapses in favor of a free energy source (which everyone knows by this date that Tesla had actually achieved), our rich and powerful lose their hold. Period.

    What we are allowed to know is determined 100% on funding. Scientists often know what we aren't being told, but they need funding so keep quiet about a lot. Sometimes you get discoveries that are so well documented and so prevalent that they can't be kept under wraps. That's because the consensus in the field becomes so strong that funding can be pulled without the "authorities" handing it out themselves or approving it. In that case you will see them scramble to come up with something that keeps them in the loop and keeps them in control. It's not rocket science........um......well maybe it is. LOL.

    I have seen terraces that are man made on the Pyramid of the Moon info videos. I have asked a few scientists I know what they think. They say they're man made. Like I said earlier - doesn't mean the whole mountain is, but it's proof enough that excavation is warranted. Some reads from varied type of equipment say we're more nuts for not investigating that we are for doing so.

    Some people are not into science - they're into media. Let them think what they want. They need to stay in the fields they've chosen to make their living because they'd fall flat in science.

    There's pyramids that have been discovered all over the world. A lot are being excavated - a few, like in Egypt aren't even much talked about. Some you can just go wander around at if you know where they are. Then there's The Pyramids at Giza that got shut down to study when the "authorities" didn't like what was being discovered - and there's this one that nobody will even claim might be a direct hit even with actual evidence. Who the hell knows what is going on for sure. Most Americans don't know we have one right here in the states that's, I believe (have to look it back up), around 1,500 years old. I don't care what those people's opinions are about what is real or what isn't, frankly. Science isn't a matter of someone's opinion - especially one from someone that's never studied that field or dealt with authorities in that field.

    I know exactly what is going on with the pyramids. You have an achaeologist - and yes he is a REAL archaeologist with a Ph.D in Mayan culture, and knows when he's looking at an aritifact - and you have a dweeb with a little power behind him coming out to see if he can take over a project if he injects some big bucks into it. You have an archaeologist who refused to give up credits for the find, and a dweeb who tries to destroy him to make him cow-tow.

    Anyhow - Schoch could be taken to court for the BS he's stirring up - but this scientist is smart enough not to waste his time on him. Court would drain time and resources and he's more interested in getting enough of this thing excavated to finally get the word out on the validity - even if just that of confirmed settlement ruins. That could lead to funding for continuing excavation on a larger scale without him getting booted from his own project. I saw that happen to a friend of mine that was the head of an exploration company. They spent a mil to find this treasure - and it was a very huge one - very probably Watley the Pirates. Then the gov stepped in and wanted it all and here goes the court proceedings and bankrupted my friend, who ended up having the whole damned thing stolen from him. That's your scientific community in action. This is just SSDD to field scientists. Nothing new other than the size of the artifact.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Very, very interesting to me.

    Especially the magnetic field that supposedly is being emitted from the centre of the primary pyramid.

    I came close to going over there to help out with the excavation process but had distractions stopping me.
  • Banned
    Fact - less than 3% of pyramids have their own zip code. - Dwight Schrute
  • Seriously, Claude?

    You're argument has deteriorated to the point where you are resorting to changing the topic and pointing out typos.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • So, Claude;

    You hi-jacked this thread just to show your ass.

    You're pitiful.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    Did you know the Luxor pyramid in Las Vegas is the only pyramid in the in the US that can be seen from space with a high powered camera lens?













    • [2] replies

    • That's another myth. The American National Archaeological Society has stated that the Luxor Pyramid is actually a natural occurring phenomenon.

      Has anyone ever seen the Luxor? Has anyone ever been there? I rest my case.

      Claude "Will say something pitiful for food" Whitacre
      • [1] reply
    • Am I spoiling your fun by quoting that?
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Now Claude you said this "And, that you know every one involved with the Bigfoot filming. And you know, for a fact, that everyone involved said it was a hoax"

    Patterson & Gimlin were the 2 people involved in the filming. Please provide evidence they said it was a hoax (fact - that never happened). If you can't provide this evidence than the "facts" show you are either ignorant or a liar.Your credibility is on the line- you need to back up your statements.
    • [1] reply

    • My credibility with you? Nothing is more important to me in the whole world. Honest.

      Here;

      The 'X' Zone Radio & TV Show: Exposing Roger Patterson's 1967 Bigfoot film hoax

      As I said before, you'll fit right in here. But here are the rules;

      Monsanto is at the core of every evil (NASA is an acceptable substitute)
      You must use the words "Quantum physics" (Quantum Mechanics is an acceptable substitute) in your post, or you lose all credibility.
      You must link to conspiracy sites. Science sites are not allowed.
      Quoting a psychic is good for extra credit.
      Evidence isn't needed. Yelling helps. And using ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is considered evidence enough.


      Welcome to the jungle
      • [1] reply

Next Topics on Trending Feed