CDC: First Ebola case confirmed in U.S

by 752 replies
897
It's here...

First Ebola case confirmed in U.S.: CDC - Washington Times
#off topic forum
  • Banned
    Just heard that on the news. Great.
    • [1] reply
    • yeah its all over youtube and the news of course lol
      • [1] reply
  • It was almost inevitable. The question is can it be contained? Also, how well can it be treated, especially if it becomes widespread?
  • It's not the first case:

    American Doctor with Ebola - Emory Hospital - Georgia

    US missionary with Ebola arrives at Nebraska Hospital.

    Stories from Reuters --

    Just check out all the things going on in the US on the global incidence map. Hey - in the states we have plague, we have anthrax, several new viruses, Equine Meningitus that is transmittable to humans. We've got some new weird virus going on, and all sorts of really scary stuff.

    There are countries that are now quarantining ebola areas - nobody in or out. It's about time. I'm not going to panick yet. We actually need a few cases to get our med facilities up to speed with how to deal with it. We still have a LOT of illegals coming over the South border..........and if you think they're all just Mexicans, you're out of touch. This could get ugly. It could just peter out with the ebola outbreaks starting to be quarantined.

    Here's a link to the global incidence maps - you can choose all sorts of things to check out - forest fires, health, hazmat incidences, etc and so on. The Texas case isn't on the map yet.


    http://outbreaks.globalincidentmap.com/home.php

    It's not a bad idea to learn how to keep your immune system on max right now.
    • [1] reply
    • [DELETED]
    • Banned
      I don't worry nearly as much about the cases arriving that we were expecting and went directly to the isolation ward of a hospital. It's the people arriving that we aren't whisking away to isolation that worry me. As for immune system ... ha ... what immune system? I barely have one. I wouldn't survive a case of ebola, but I'm more worried about the rest of the population and my family of course.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • There was one suspected case in Sacramento, too - but turned out to be a false alarm. At least it was paid attention to well and right away. I worry about what's coming over our south border. There's a reason for legal immigration, and health screening is probably one of the most important of them. The stuff on the incident map is there because it's possible that bio-terrorism is the reason it's here. There's a lot of other stuff going on in health that doesn't hit the map because it's natural and normal for it to be here.

    I keep my immune system cranked on high at all times. With the population as dense (lol, I love that word - so ambiguous), as mobile, and as generally sick as it is now, I don't need to catch even a cold because some clod is running around sick in public.
  • Banned
    So where's the other 100 people that was on the same plane back to the US?
    • [2] replies
    • Yikes. Spooky question for sure, Yukon. Hopefully they got him before he got a chance to "spread the wealth." That's something I didn't think of looking up when I was looking into this issue - is whether you are contagious or not before symptoms show. Of course - that might still leave hundreds on the ground that might be precariously situated depending on where this guy went and when after landing. I guess about all we can do about it is to watch for "further updates".
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Allegedly, you are not contagious until you have symptoms. That's what they say anyway. I bolded everything that bothers me about the story. A lack of transparency about the patient and who and how many he has contacted. By now, they should know exactly how many he has had contact with, other than just being in a general crowd and why the secrecy about his identity and nationality? And why wasn't he taken to one of the four isolation units specifically set up for Ebola patients, rather than dumping him in a facility that does not have one. The hospital of course says they are well prepared, but that's hog wash to me. That's like a hospital saying that you come to a hospital to get well, when it's fairly common to get very ill from viruses and other things that spread in a hospital when not handled correctly.

      • [1] reply
  • This was inevitable. I knew it from the start, that they were gonna screw up. God bless us all!
    • [1] reply
    • They sure did let it roll for awhile before they started quarantining areas.

      Of course - Monsanto stands to make a LOT of big money if we get flaming outbreaks. They have a lot of money sunk into that vaccine that pharm is making. I have no doubt it will flame here for no other reason. They have to do something. The world is completely rejecting their GMO poisoning. They also just bought out a geoengineering firm and now the whole world other than the States is illegalizing private sectors practicing geoengineering. Not being a good time for them. They're going to have to bank on a pandemic.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • 4 flown back? On the outbreak map both hospitals are listed, but Reuters only reported one patient at each. WTF is going on?

    At least Texas is defending their border - California is just letting people walk in at will. Exactly how many strolling over are from Africa - and from infected areas? This should be of grave concern to everyone. The population in S. California is about the largest and densest in the country. Not a good place to have some illegal with ebola strolling into. If that person were to get into mass transit in LA during a rush hour, we could have a zombie apocalypse on our hands within a few weeks.
    • [1] reply
    • It's a little late to start worrying about the border...but I think it's something like this or a major terrorist attack that will finally make D.C. finally close the borders. For now, it isn't a priority for them.

      There have been at least four U.S. citizens returned with ebola on special flights to the US for treatment. That's been over several weeks time. What is impressive is that all patients treated here survived the disease.

      We'll know within 3 weeks if it's stopped or not - that's the incubation period, isn't it? There are different levels of isolation wards perhaps but most hospitals have areas reserved for treating communicable diseases. The worst thing that can happen is for the public to panic.

      I expect emergency rooms in that geographic area will be busy with people who have any cold or flu symptoms.
  • Banned
    Man in Dallas With Ebola Had Been Sent Home From Hospital
    Texas already screwed this up. Let's see ... sent home with antibiotics after seeking treatment for unknown illness. What's wrong with that picture? For one, treating an illness with antibiotics without knowing what illness you're treating is idiotic. Antibiotics don't cure viruses and apparently, they just hand them out like candy in Texas if they don't know what you've got.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • What really bothers me is the lack of information. I don't need to know this person's name - but I would like to know whether he was allowed a visa to visit here or whether, as one report says, he was 'moving to the US".

      Are we handing out visa to the US in Liberia? Is that a good idea right now? Who is making those decisions?

      Hope that bolded part is right...and crew members wouldn't show symptoms 2 days later! I bet they are scared.

      Perhaps the worst thing about ebola is the sneaky way symptoms appear. From everything I read they look just like a cold or simple flu - so it's not unlikely doctors would say "go home and drink lots of fluids". If patient has any fever, the standard practice is "here's an antibiotic".

      Hospitals can't admit and isolate everyone with head cold symptoms but it does seem that if a patient said "I just arrived from LIBERIA" - someone should have said 'wait just a minute' and investigated further.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Not just Texas. Sadly, the candy-like dispensing of antibiotics has been going on for a long while. So long, in fact, that superbugs have now become resistant to them.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    Here's something else disturbing.

    • [1] reply
    • If someone says he has not been exposed to ebola - can we believe him?

      Think about a visit to the emergency room - water fountains, magazines to look through, hard surface seats that you touch and cough on - rest rooms - counters where you stand giving personal info to a clerk - door handles....

      Stopping at a convenience store along the way to or from the hospital - looking through OTC meds in a WM or drug store.

      The public message is calm and collected - but I'll bet behind the scenes, the CDC is very worried about this case.
      • [1] reply
  • Remember in the late 80's - that warehouse they had 400 monkeys in (I can't remember what the reason was. Research maybe). When Ebola hit those monkeys, it started to take every one of them in that one room down. There was nothing but an air duct into the next room - yet the monkeys in the next room also contracted the virus. How? We are not being told the truth. I have seen many statements from medical researchers that have stated it is definitely aerosol (at least in some strains) and possibly air-borne. I would think any attempt to say it's not at least aerosol is nothing but an attempt to keep people from panicking. I also think it's a dangerous one. We need to know the truth about this one. If they want to see panick - let's see what happens when people don't know what the truth is and an area gets hit with it.
  • Here we go. When in doubt of what media tells us (for our own good, of course) --
    PubMed is our friend.
    Aerosol exposure to Zaire ebolavirus in thre... [Microbes Infect. 2011] - PubMed - NCBI
    Lethal experimental infections of rhesus mo... [Int J Exp Pathol. 1995] - PubMed - NCBI

    One main concern, too - is that just because a virus is not air-borne at the time, does not mean it can't morph into one that is.
    • [1] reply
    • [1] reply
    • Realistically - ebola is not going to "morph" overnight. What it is and how it is spread is frightening enough without imagining something worse.

      It has not become airborne, the virus itself it apparently fragile when left on a surface and that trait has saved us in the past from some bad stuff.

      There is no reason to panic but the 5 children who were exposed to this man attended 4 schools after exposure. They do not have symptoms but I'm sure parents from all of those schools are terrified and I would be, too.

      All of the promises won't reassure people until time has passed (3 weeks) with no new cases.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Suzanne - um - the full text links are right there.

    I didn't say actually "airborne". I was talking about aerosol. The difference is how far something can travel in air. Your assessment "unless someone sneezed on you" - that's aerosol. That is what research is pointing to. You only read the abstract? I don't think abstracts cover much? Anyhow - the virus has been shown to be aerosol to at least some primates. Not in other animals - but since there's been little study of the active disease they don't know for sure if "primates" is close enough to us for it to be considered aerosol transmittable. I wouldn't take chances with it if I have a choice.
    And it is a virus. How many people could be effected if it mutates?

    Questions we need to be open to watching out for at the very least.

    As far as what is going on in this country health-wise. Ebola isn't the only really nasty and potentially fatal virus running around the states. This is a new one. It's being around 70% deadly over there, but we've had 4 victims who have all survived. Now we have one who was a surprise. We'll just have to see if he survives, too, huh?

    As far as being worried about my health. I'm not overly so -- but when I go somewhere and see an employee who is obviously sick and should be at home rather than coughing and sneezing on everything they touch................I just leave. There's more than one reason I like to live in low population densities.
    • [1] reply
    • This strain has NOT been found to be airborne - or aerosol - in any instance involving humans. It does not affect animals in the same way - explained in this article

      Alex Jones and some bloggers are beginning to push the "mutation" angle and predict dire future consequences. They'll be pushing the hysteria button which is highly irresponsible.

      Can Ebola Go Airborne? - Forbes

      Turns out this particular man CARRIED a woman who was dying of ebola. That's serious exposure as the end stages involves a lot of 'body fluids'.

      What I want to know - and I think others would if they though of it - is whether he was able to get a visa quickly after being exposed.....or did he already have the visa. I think that's important information.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    Heard about it, just now..tsk3x!
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • There's a clue in the fact no one's found the cure for the common cold.

      No disrespect to Americans either but I don't think they can be praised for finding all the cures. Many yes but not all.

      (Edit. That's not to say they don't do a sterling job of finding cures of course, just that other countries do occasionally do things too)
  • Banned
    It's been widely reported that the CDC put out a similar directive:

    Cheers

    -don
  • BBC News - Liberia 'to prosecute US Ebola man'

    Liberia says it plans to prosecute US Ebola patient for allegedly lying over his contacts with infected relative
    • [2] replies
    • And they should.

      This whole situation has me very unsettled. Texas, Hawaii. Who's next? How long before we all have to lock ourselves in our homes for weeks until it either all ends or the world ends?

      Unstable people like myself do not handle this shit well.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • Banned
      I'm glad to hear this and hope that it means that as soon as he is well enough, the US will be rid of him and he will be forced back to Liberia. I hope the US reconsiders allowing people from ebola stricken countries to come here for casual visits.
  • Banned
    CDC issued the warning...obviously the patient's travel history should have been taken more seriously.

    For sure some health care facilities got the message.

    Cheers

    -don
  • Banned
    I wonder how many will be punished for what happened last month in Guinea?

    Cheers

    -don
  • Banned
    Stay home or face arrest...

    Cheers

    -don
    • [1] reply

    • That gave me my first laugh today! Good one!

      Though I think this shit makes all of us a bit unstable....
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    The nephew who called the CDC to make sure that his uncle was going to receive appropriate ebola care, after the first botched attempt, is now complaining that his uncle is not receiving ZMax ...

    Too funny ... guy lies about his contacts with ebola victims, comes here for the best chances of survival after being exposed, has had direct and indirect contact with 100 people here and put them at risk, and his nephew thinks he deserves a medication that has been depleted and used only for the elite ... those doctors and health care workers on the front lines trying to save other people's lives. Talk about entitlement.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    So watching TV news now and there's properly outfitted people at the site cleaning and looking like they've been doing it for days ... all because of all the press about the contaminated apartment ... now it's all a dog and pony show to show us they're on it. What a fiasco.
    • [1] reply
    • I don't agree that drug trials should be rushed due to a crisis.

      We know from experience over many years that drugs released early without proper and lengthy testing often have unforeseen side effects. These lead to huge financial liabilities and I think any company with a bright future in pharma is going to balk at taking a wild chance on a drug.

      It's not that the story is "bogus" for being on the Jones site among others - but the story gets bent just a little and comes across with a different spin.

      The US has committed 3000 military troops and says it's freeing up $500 million dollars to fight ebola in Africa. I think the idea that we aren't doing enough is ridiculous.

      http://www.cnbc.com/id/102048993#.
      • [1] reply
  • Chlorine. Chlorine kills it. I remember that from reading about the incident with all the monkeys a few decades back. It takes chlorine 7 minutes to kill ebola. I would think that the family of that man might want to start sterilizing the house and keep it that way.

    I would think it's time for the communities with the outbreaks to start shocking their wells and sterilizing their homes. Might not be enough, but it sure as hell would not hurt them.
    • [1] reply
    • Yep. Bleach or isopropyl alcohol (possibly vinegar too). I saw a news clip of NBCs Dr. Nancy Sniderman in
      Liberia and they do have big jugs (with a push button spout at the bottom) of bleach water all over the place for hand washing. I'd certainly be spraying a solution of that all over my house if I were in their situation.

      Dan
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • You and me both, Dan. I'm not a germaphobe, but I don't live in any areas where there is a dense population. I also watch the global outbreak maps to see if there's anything unusual or deadly going on in my area, and, of course, I keep my immune system as toned as possible. I find the scariest thing about these viruses is the sheer density of population and how many people can be encountered by one infected individual during the average day.

    http://outbreaks.globalincidentmap.com/home.php
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • I was like whaaaaat? Dirty brain....
      • [1] reply
    • Tis scary. I almost never get sick. One day I was working at Wal-Mart and this customer comes fairly close
      to me - actually brushed her shoulder against me for a minute or so. I asked how she's doing and she proceeds to tell me not well 'cause she has the flu that was going around. I got it for about four days - worst flu of my life.

      I actually stayed out one extra day because two of my co-workers were in their late 70's or early 80's.
      I did not have to worry about the guy in his 70's though. He's a retired pediatrician with the best immune system ever. LOL He did get that nasty flu and was fine the next day.
  • Banned
    Flight ban info: US carriers are still flying...


    Cheers

    -dn
    • [1] reply
    • ............................................
      • [1] reply
  • One concern would be the point at which area hospitals and facilities and trained staff are overwhelmed. The US is veeeery far from that level.

    Coverage about cases here remind me of my skeptic engineer friends take on dirty bombs that had
    so many people scared. "It would just be a matter of guys in protective suits going around with trash bags to pick up the debris."
    • [2] replies
    • Banned
      Yep ... just saw that. At least the hospital connected the dots between recent Nigeria travel and sick person and isolated him immediately. Wonder how many people he's been in contact with since becoming sick?
      • [1] reply
    • Already an advertisement for military grade ebola virus protection suit on that page.

      Dan
  • Banned
    Clean Guys Environmental (CGE) arrived at the apartment last about 9PM last night to "access the.situation, make a plan, and then communicate with the CDC"...after that is/was done the cleaning commences. They company stated this job should be a "walk in the park".

    Cheers

    -don
  • Banned
    Yes, the company did not have the proper Federal transportation permits to transport this type of hazardous material which evidently is handled through the state government.

    As Kay mentioned Texas officials supposedly had trouble finding a company to do the job...

    Dallas officials say the cleanup should take about 3 hours and the hospital that turned him away says he was not turned away due to human error, he was turned away because of a "software problem". I guess they figure humans did not code or setup the software...

    Cheers

    -don
  • I don't know if anyone has mentioned this but I heard that 1st case guy went to a hospital in Texas and told them of the possible problem and they sent his away.
    • [2] replies
    • Banned
      Yeah ... it's been mentioned a lot.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • Banned
      Hospital officials are saying that was due to a "software problem" and the problem has since been corrected.

      Cheers

      -don
  • Nope (unless you come in contact with his sweat, blood, vomit, urine or feces)
    • [1] reply

    • Cbpayne; Soooo, in my case, the answer is a big "Yes!"

      I call them "The Big Five Essentials To Selling Success".

      The steps in selling at high levels are (in this order)
      Sweat
      Blood
      Vomit
      Urine
      Feces
      And a mint, to freshen the breath.

      Why do you think I need a plastic bubble wrap suit? Selling is messy.

      The more you know.....
  • Banned
    Just read the Texas Ebola patient came here to get married. I'm thinking he came up with that idea right after carrying a near dead girl around, considering that's when he decided to leave Liberia.

    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      I saw a report that said he purchased the ticket 2 weeks before the incident of handling the sick woman.

      Cheers. - Frank
  • Banned
    Here's a report that was hidden in wiki that I just saw

    Officials: Second person being monitored for Ebola

    Sounds like one the quarantined family members might be coming down with some illness
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      USA Today put this out on Oct 2, the day after that report...

      Cheers

      -don
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    @ Suzanne

    That story was not very well "hidden" as two days ago USA Today, Time and others published it to their very popular websites....

    Second Patient Monitored for Ebola in Texas

    Cheers

    -don
  • Banned
    @ Ron

    That was already posted on this thread by cbpayne...

    http://www.warriorforum.com/off-topi...ml#post9569321

    Cheers

    -don
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I don't know about you, but if I was quarantined somewhere that someone came down with ebola, I sure as hell wouldn't be waiting for a "service" to clean. I'd be spraying down my whole kitchen and bathroom and anything else I could hit with bleach without ruining it. Anything else would be getting soaked with rubbing alcohol. I'd be taking every natural anti-viral I had in the house and showering at least 3 times a day. I can't imagine "waiting for a service". I also can't imagine anyone not having a few very potent virus/bacteria killers like bleach, vinegar, and rubbing alcohol in their home. I might not be a germaphobe - but I know how to clean a damned infected house, for cripes sakes.
    • [2] replies

    • That's because you have an awareness of what a virus is.

      I have no idea what the education level is of the people quarantined,....but some people have no idea how a virus works, or how it makes you sick, or even how it's transmitted.

      That is one reason a virus spreads. Education is a great defense.

      And Sal, some people simply don't think about germs or bacteria. It isn't part of their awareness. Again I have no idea about the people involved.
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      She scrubbed with bleach. That's not the problem. The problem is bio hazardous waste. You are not allowed to dispose of bio hazardous waste in just any old way that you want to. They were told not to dispose of the sheets and towels because bio hazardous waste is not allowed to be dumped casually. The cleaning company they hired to clean the apartment didn't even have the special permit required to transport bio hazardous waste. Hospitals don't just throw their bio hazardous waste in dumpsters. The sheets and towels and mattress that he slept on along with his luggage and personal items are now in sealed barrels and guarded by guards until they are disposed of permanently.

      So what is really disgusting is these people had to live there for days with this material inside their home and no way to dispose of it safely.

      And to make sure they get any contamination in a building, they normally fill the room with fumes that will kill it in cracks and places that would be easily overlooked. Obviously, a home owner can't do this and still live in the home.

      http://biosafety.utk.edu/files/2012/...ste_basics.pdf
  • The mere fact that a *hospital* couldn't keep the chain of communication open - utterly baffling to me.

    And don't forget the Enterovirus68 that's spreading as well. 2 towns over from mine had a confirmed case.

    Not an informed world in which we live.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      What's pretty clear is that if cases keep cropping up, they're going to have to do a whole lot better than the Texas model.

      That hospital issued a statement that the reason the doctors didn't get the note that the patient had traveled from Liberia was due to a "technical glitch" in their software, which has now been fixed. A day later, they retract that statement saying there was no technical glitch and the doctors had access to that information all along. Same hospital told us he came in sick on the 26th. Now it's the 25th he came in sick and was turned away. I looked up the record/reputation of that hospital. It's not good by any standard.

      The bio hazard waste procedures have to be in place at the time of infections, which means now. Both hospitals and the government in charge of decontamination of buildings have to know what they're doing and do it immediately, not a week later, and there has to be a place and a procedure for destroying the bio hazardous waste. The home owners and apartment dwellers can only clean apartments with bleach. They cannot dispose of bio hazardous waste. We don't want it in our dumpsters.

      But you're right ... right now, I'm far more concerned about the enterovirus and my grandchildren in schools. It is spreading and some kids are dying and others are suffering from paralysis.
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    Read a story this morning about the judge in Texas who ordered that the family who is quarantined be moved. This judge drove them himself to a 4-bedroom farm with acres of land around it to move them. He then did an interview and see ... I'm still wearing the same t-shirt that I wore when I drove them. None of them have symptoms. I know that he is trying to instill calm, but that's still a pretty brave thing to do in my book, since these are the people who had very direct and prolonged exposure to him. Quite a story.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
  • Duncan is now in critical condition.

    Hospital: US Ebola patient in critical condition


    Health officials said Saturday that they are currently monitoring about 50 people for signs of the deadly disease who may have had contact with Duncan, including nine who are believed to be at a higher risk. Thus far none have shown symptoms. Among those being monitored are people who rode in the ambulance that transported Duncan back to the hospital before his diagnosis, said Dr. Tom Frieden, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    You have to read the whole thing. Good grief!

    ~ Theresa
    • [1] reply
    • I was watching news and eating a sandwich....what I noticed today was every person who upchucks on a plane now is headline news of "possible ebola".

      Didn't do much for my sandwich.
      • [1] reply
  • The U.S.A. has no Surgeon General.

    http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/the-nra-m...a-crisis-worse
    • [3] replies
    • Banned
      I don't know if it makes it worse. According to that article, the role of the Surgeon General is "We need ... a surgeon general to echo and amplify the messages coming from the CDC, and to provide evidence-based advocacy to shape our response."

      So his/her role sounds a bit redundant to me.
    • You never miss a chance to take a swipe, do you? I'm glad you think one person sitting in D.C. would have changed this story. We already have several people sitting in that town - and they don't seem to be doing much, do they?

      Some didn't like a non-US born doctor when there are many well qualified doctors qualified for this position. He ran a group supporting Obama's election and this appt is seen by some as payoff. He's also known for calling gun control a major health issue in the U.S.

      Vivek Murthy’s surgeon general nomination halted by Democrats: How the NRA won without a filibuster.

      His own party won't vote on his appointment. That's how controversial he is.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      The fact of the matter is we do have an Acting Surgeon General. Regina Benjamin's deputy was made the Acting Surgeon General and he appears to be a well qualified guy. He and his wife are both doctors.

      Rear Admiral Boris D. Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H., is currently the Acting United States Surgeon General.

      Since 1973 the Surgeon General position has not always been filled promptly or immediately.

      Previous Surgeons General | SurgeonGeneral.gov

      In-fact we have had 10 different Acting Surgeon Generals and 8 Surgeon Generals since Jan. 31, 1973.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgeon..._United_States

      The official duties of the Surgeon General are listed here:

      http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/about/duties/index.html

      Cheers

      -don
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Even with a SG, I think CDC would be calling the shots.
  • I can't say for sure, but this may help for faster diagnosis and perhaps allow top experts to look at samples digitally:

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/womans...143400959.html
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • This has been a good thread. Hopefully it won't deteriorate into another pissing match.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • Banned
      That's quite a story. Blood tests that only require a drop of blood, at 50% of the cost, can be done at a pharmacy instead of the Dr.'s office. Sounds good to me. I don't see why it wouldn't work for ebola too.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    This is the saddest story and one of the really awful things about this disease... that people want to hold and care for their sick loved ones.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/wo...n-liberia.html
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
  • Banned
    I was thinking about this and reading up on the origins of ebola and while they don't really know what is the reservoir host of ebola, the animal or whatever where ebola lives when it's not actively killing people, in this article, there's evidence of a connection to fruit bats (to 3 different types of bats, actually). It appears that studies on those bats show that the bats have low levels of ebola RNA and are also effectively immune from ebola. People in Africa eat those bats.

    Far more gorillas and chimps have died from ebola in the same areas that people are dying from ebola. Another interesting fact. Not that they're the carriers ... but more likely they eat the fruit or come into contact with the bats.

    Fruit Bats Likely Hosts of Deadly Ebola Virus
  • Banned
    Guinea banned bat eating back in March.

    Cheers

    -don
  • The ironic thing though is that a lack of vitamin C can cause scurvy. Vitamin C can EASILY be used up, and is water soluble. It CAN'T really be stored. SCURVY presents in a similar way to ebola.

    BOTH have you bleeding from areas with mucous membrane. Of course, I would NEVER advocate it as a cure, or try it myself, but it is worth a try. It can't hurt and MIGHT help.

    It is ironic that MANY fatal diseases are NOT really "FATAL", but rather end up as fatal because of the body's attempt to fight them off, or because of symptoms that happen because of other symptoms.

    Steve
  • What struck me is that normal doses of Vitamin C are 500 to 1000 mg or maybe 2000 mg.
    Linus Pauling was an advocate of Vitamin C, but even he was - as I recall - suggesting
    2000 mg to 3000 mg for a healthy immune system.

    For Ebola they were talking 180 grams. Seems like there would be toxicity levels at 90 to
    180 time normal? Also, a side effect of too much Vitamin C can be diarrhea. Not something good
    for Ebola.
    • [3] replies
    • If I recall right, many are now saying like 5000 to 10,000, though the 10,000 would be multiple doses. YEAH, 180 GRAMS is WAY too much. Vitamin C is a VITAMIN and considered a MICRO nutrient. I think even 1GM defies that definition. And people are saying 5-10 GMs. And if you get diarrhea, you are excreting a lot of the vitamin C.

      STILL, tissues obviously react to vitamin C, and Scurvy is similar there. If Vitamin C could cause a person to live for even a few more days, they can avoid the final symptom, and SURVIVE! So it IS conceivable that Vitamin C could help. If there is a case where they don't have the special, and EXPENSIVE, TIME CONSUMING, and RARE, new drugs, it might be a good idea to try Vitamin C. In theory, they would have to take it BEFORE the last stage became obvious. And that IS the stage where there is NO doubt they have Ebola. So I hope they take a blood sample before trying it out, etc... so they can PROVE it was ebola.

      Steve
      • [1] reply
    • This is a stupid idea. Taking that much Ascorbic Acid is unnatural. Big Pharma trying to get you to take more vitamins.

      Well, I'm going to do it the natural way. 800 oranges a day should keep me healthy. Of course, this may all be a plot by "Big Fruit" to get us to buy lots of oranges and drive the price up.

      I've been trying to think of a way to bring Quantum Physics into this, but I've eaten 500 oranges today, and my brain is a little weak from Vitamin C toxicity.

      I've been reading about Vitamin C addiction.. There is a program where you replace the oranges with lemons. You still die from the massive doses of vitamin C...but your pee smells like Lemon Pledge.

      Anyway, I've been looking for a way to say "Big Pharma" in a post, without sounding like an idiot.

      I think my work is done here.


      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Ascorbic acid form of Vitamin C at doses of 1000/IU will kill normal flu. You have to ask for it (infusion) when you are hospitalized, they don't just offer it. Not sure why, but....................

      Ebola? I would think it would help, but actually cure it? We already know when we're talking about the medical complex, they don't offer naturals. At all. Whether they work or not.

      A perfect virus isn't as virulent as ebola. Ebola replicates too fast for it's own survival -- it kills its host. It's also not "flu". If it were to mutate to a more perfect form that it would make people sick but not kill them, I'd try ascorbic acid to get rid of it. I use it when I feel flu hitting and never completely get flu. I wouldn't trust it for this one. This is a whacked bug and it's not actually "flu" from what I can understand.

      I think one of the things that should be being done right now is to find out what people were doing and eating before they came down with it - see if there's a common thread going in what people that survive the bug are doing different from those that are dying. I'd like to know, because I'd like to start doing that if the US becomes a hot spot. Right now I make sure my levels of D and C are high, and keep eating my probiotics and organic yogurt and blood purifiers, liver cleansers, for my immune system because when push comes to shove, you better hope that's set on max. Other than that -- we don't really know. I wouldn't claim to know. All I know is an immune system fights disease, and a compromised one is deadly with or without something like ebola to worry about.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Couldn't not try it.
  • Banned
    @ Sal

    Derek Gatherer, a bioinformatics researcher (Lancaster University U.K.) that studies viral genetics and evolution has some thoughts on the biological markers that have been linked to ebola survival. Below are a few of them...

    Cheers

    -don
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • That's really interesting, Don. I haven't read the full link yet - just read your excerpts. Now I wonder how people know which of the genes they have. Hoping the article gives some indication when I read it (tomorrow am) about how we know which gene type we are. From my family history, I am hopeful, and almost convinced that I've got some pretty kick-butt genes going for me, but who knows.

    Thanks for that share.
  • Been reading. It seems that the areas that are getting hit hard with Ebola are places where the people are nutritionally deficient. CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes are deficient in people with a lack of energy proteins, Vit A and Zinc. That would go along with a lot of aid in these countries that give kids doses of Vit A. Also with the fact that they don't get much in the line of animal protein. Conversely - those who get too much strenuous exercise may be low on their lymphocytes for up to 3 weeks after they quit the overly strenuous exercise. In atheletes these lymphocytes deplete for around 30 minutes after exercise than resume to normal if the exercise isn't continually over done.

    Interesting. Maybe the American diet will help to cut the spread of Ebola here.

    As far as the Alleles - (B*7 and B*14) - he's going to have to get further than that. There are so many that it would be hard to actually categorize who's going to get sick based on that - and you'd have to know which are indigenous to your own body. Some that are in the logs are so rare they've only been seen in one individual. 7 is only around 25% of people in Nova Scotia - very small percent elsewhere. There's got to be a better indicator that HLA's.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Do you think various medical labs and doctors and scientists are NOT testing and examining every bit of information about this virus? It is big news in the world of medical labs and medical research and every detail is being studied by virologists and sociologists and every other ologist that applies.

      If this were as simple as giving Vit C infusions, wouldn't that be wonderful? You know it isn't like that. This is a living virus that attacks the human body. Weak people will succumb in higher numbers - nothing new there.

      A closer look at vitamin injections « Science-Based Medicine

      We are highly unlikely to see an outbreak in this country because we understand isolation of a virus and have the facilities to do isolation of patients. We don't have the fear and distrust of villagers in a third world country that try to hide the disease.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • Banned
      Yeah, I'd avoid eating bats, gorillas, chimps, and monkeys right now. Much as I love a good spicy bat soup and gorilla steaks on the grill, I think I'll give it up for now. I'd also avoid eating the fruits that bats and apes eat, because they can contaminate the fruit. I think I'll stay out of caves and mines too.


  • Banned
    Global threat of Ebola: From the US to China, scientists plot spread of deadly disease across the world from its West African hotbed

    Interesting article. I think it's pretty clear that it's in the best interest of every country to provide aid to stop the West Africa epidemic as soon as possible.

    Ebola could hit UK 'within three weeks', scientists warn | Daily Mail Online

  • Banned
  • Monsanto is teamed up with the pharm making the gene-silencing drug.
    The Best Investment For The Fight Against Ebola - NASDAQ.com

    I'm sure that not eating animals that have ebola is a good idea, and something that the people over there do. Many are starving and don't have much to eat. I was just finding it interesting that the particular elements that are lacking that create T cell deficiencies are the energy proteins, zinc....and particularly vitamin A...which is something that the aid missions always stock up on to give to the people because of the shortages there.

    It's also interesting that if there are genes that allow the disease to progress by hindering T cell production that one company --- one that has been making toxic poison for 100 years, and now is creating toxic food...........has the technology and know how to silence genes. Go figure.

    Everyone here that knows me knows I am not fond of pharmaceuticals with side effects that are the same as what they are supposed to control - especially untested ones. I was a guinea pig for one of those once and it was not a good time. However - we're talking about a possible pandemic, super deadly bug.

    Nobody is talking about hooking people on a lifetime of pharmaceuticals - this is a matter of giving people with little chance otherwise something for a few days to kill a bug that most likely won't leave them alive - and maybe not functioning correctly after that if they survive. It's a chance to kill the outbreak before it wipes out 50% of the people on a planet - and several other animal species. If it's a gene silencer...well Monsanto's an expert at that, if nothing else.

    While I am fully and aggressively insistent we have better chances when we build our immune systems naturally.......um........if you aren't already doing that when this crap comes around, you don't have time for that. We also know that it still plays hell on people who's immune systems are buffed enough that they survive the bug. Depending on having the right genes as I pointed out in a previous post is a crap shoot at best. I say try the drug.

    That's right. You heard me say that. Right out loud.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Texas Ebola patient gets experimental drug

      The Texas patient has just been given an experimental anti-viral that hasn't yet been tested on animals or humans, but is in Phase 3 trials.

      I wish him well and hope it helps. He's still critical, but stable at this time.

      EDIT: It has been tested in humans.
      Brincidofovir was developed by Chimerix Inc, which said it has been tested in more than 1,000 patients without raising safety concerns. "Chimerix has brincidofovir tablets available for immediate use in clinical trials," the company said in a statement.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Interesting, Suzanne. That's a different one than I just linked to. Anyhow - I think they're doing the right thing this time. If it were a just a regular flu outbreak, I'd be furious. This isn't just a nasty flu, though. And the more people that get it, the stronger the chance it will mutate to an airborne infection, so I think we need to take chances that we wouldn't normally take in stopping it.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • BBC News - Ebola outbreak: Nurse infected in Spain

    A nurse in Spain who treated an Ebola patient there had contracted the disease.
  • So Derek - weigh in on this one, please. What's your take on the situation?
    • [1] reply
    • Sal, this is definitely going to get people thinking about the risks of repatriating their nationals with Ebola home for treatment. There will definitely be some disquiet among unions of health care workers. However, you are unlikely to get large scale outbreaks because the health care systems are much more advanced than in Africa.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    • [2] replies
    • I saw that and don't get the without protective gear part.
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      The tests were negative, he does not have Ebola.

      Cheers

      -don
      • [1] reply
  • Way too careless.

    The body of a dead Ebola patient is highly contagious.
    I'd prefer they cremate at the hospital.

    If I were the deputy, I'd be wanting to go to the Nebraska hospital.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I guess he won't be facing any charges

    Only now, the US and Canada are going to begin screening travellers for Ebola.

    Source: Texas Ebola patient dies as Canada, U.S. unveil screening plans

    ETA: I feel bad that he died, but I'm furious that he lied in the first place.
  • That's good to know, Jody. Now if we could just get them to close the South border where illegals just walking in every day are bringing other diseases in, too. Entrovirus...effecting kids in around 10 states now (maybe more, that was the last time I looked).......and brought to you by your friendly illegal immigration train.

    We need to stop the politically correct, no profiling bull shyte and start taking care of our people or this isn't the only virus/disease we're going to have to worry about.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Yes, they did. But I think the CDC takes some of the blame, too. They were called in immediately - and THEY did nothing about cleaning up contaminated apt either. That shocked me more than the Texas hospital response.

      I would expect in a case like this for the CDC to come in and take over - and it seemed like no one was running the show.
      • [2] replies
  • Seems to me we better be watchful of it:

    (bold is mine)

    "Until now" ........does this indicate virus morphing?

    Enterovirus D68 and Paralysis | HealthMap

    They have references about the virus from pubmed and the CDC if anyone wants to study the issue in greater detail.
  • 'I touched my face with gloves': nurse with Ebola - The Local

    Note that the sanitation team member has a protective suit on.
    I hope that's an indication that Spain handles this thing well.

    After looking at this and the pictures Suzanne posted in #228 and noting the lack of
    protective clothing, and the other things that could have been handled better,
    I can't help but wonder if our federal, state and local systems of government
    unintentionally create a missing a link when it comes to command and control
    of a situation like this.

    I'm not being political here, just looking at this from an organizational perspective.
    There needs to be someone calling the shots, establishing protocols, and seeing
    that the protocols are followed. Say, "Get the quarantine papers signed, and do
    it with protective gear on."... "Sanitize areas following these procedures"...

    <><><><><><><><><><>

    About the nurse's dog in Spain, I also thought just quarantine it. It's been a few hours
    since I've read the latest on that issue, but I've realized that as sad as it is, there is
    the possibility that the dog could be a carrier and never get sick. They seem to think
    the bats are just hosts. Maybe it's the same with dogs. Sorry.

    <><><><><><><><><><>

    This is the first time - I think - that I've read Thelocal.com. It seems good. I like the layout and the
    local noticeboard as well as the coverage.
    • [1] reply
    • I think the case in Spain is much more worrying than the case in the US. With the ease of air travel today, you are bound to get the occasional case in other countries. However in the case of Spain, you have a developed country where full precautions were supposed to be taken. I am surprised that they allowed a nursing assistant to be involved in the care of a patient. I would have thought that more senior staff should have been involved who have more training and medical knowledge.
      • [1] reply
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      That's pretty irrelevant to ebola. Ebola is a virus and cannot be cured with anti-biotics.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    Really good news for the NBC cameraman
    Ebola-Stricken NBC News Freelancer Ashoka Mukpo 'Turned the Corner'
    Ebola-Stricken NBC News Freelancer Ashoka Mukpo 'Turned the Corner' - NBC News

    This story pisses me off though. These are intelligent people who agreed to self quarantine and then didn't and now they are in mandated quarantine

    New Jersey enforces mandatory quarantine for NBC crew exposed to Ebola, including Dr. Nancy Snyderman | WJLA.com

    Looks like the Spanish patient is doing ok too
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...0HZ0U920141011
  • BBC News - Positive Ebola test at US hospital

    Texas health care worker tests positive for Ebola at hospital which looked after victim Thomas Duncan, officials say
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      That's disturbing. I sort of expected one or more of the family to maybe test positive, but did not expect a health care worker. I wonder if it's a worker who had contact before or after they knew he had Ebola. If I were that worker, I'd insist on care at a different facility, like in Nebraska. I don't trust that hospital in Texas.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • How many reported cases have there been in the US so far? Haven't been following the news in the past few days.
  • They overreacted with the hazmat suits! I mean the guy could have infected everyone, and/or the plane, and they send like 4 people in stumbling over themselves in hazmat suits. they should have had one guy outside the plane, and asked the guy to come out. OTHERWISE, he could have ripped a hazmat suit and endangered the person. If he wouldn't come out, he could just have everyone ELSE come out and take another flight.

    As for the bacteria in cattle? It is a WELL KNOWN FACT that the WORST such bacteria was grown in hospitals. Maybe that is even where the DR STDs were created. They REALLY need to fix the hospitals. MRSA infection Definition - Diseases and Conditions - Mayo Clinic

    Steve
    • [1] reply
    • The truth is this is a highly infectious (no matter what they say) deadly virus. You can't guarantee safety - you can't promise no more cases - you can only do everything possible to contain the cases you have and protect those who are not exposed.

      We have this sense of "should have done this or that" and sometimes no matter what you do - it is not enough because we are not capable of conquering everything or preventing every bad outcome.

      Assigning blame accomplishes no more than panic does. There will probably be additional US cases - no way to guarantee there won't be.

      On the positive side - we have not seen cases related to exposure to Duncan. People living with him and caring for him without protection - no new cases. People who were exposed to the kids in the house, neighbors, people in stores where he may have shopped, etc. That could have been very bad and hasn't been a problem.
      • [1] reply
  • I deeply appreciate the people who volunteer to serve in our military.

    A lot of the spread in Liberia has to do with burial practices and sanitation -
    changing fast I hope:

    In Liberia, Burial Practices Hinder Battle Against Ebola - WSJ

    Also found this interesting:

    http://www.notimpossiblenow.com/the-...tImpossibleNow

    http://healthmap.org/en/
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • I am surprised they don't decon the suits before anyone gets out of them. Spray those things down with bleach. Bleach kills the bug. Seems to be kinda counter-productive to have them getting out of suits that may have contamination all over the outside - too risky.....um as we have seen.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Yeah ... it seems taking off the suit is as risky as not wearing one. First the nurse in Spain and now the nurse in Texas.
      • [2] replies
  • yes - decon the suits. I wonder if there is some newer material that is more disposable, burnable.
    From the pictures, what they use now looks heavy and cumbersome.

    Dan
    • [1] reply
    • I've seen the workers in news clips stepping in troughs of chemicals to to kill germs on their boots and seen them standing while someone is spraying the outside of their suits. These aren't stupid people.

      There are different levels of tyvek suits - some have full air filtration and are cumbersome - some are full coverup and make it easier to move around.

      The suits all look hot and uncomfortable to me. Can't imagine how they'd feel in hot climates.

      Edit: I was just listening to the CDC guy on TV. He was talking about the difficult of removing the suits safely - and I wondered about the little robot that decontaminates surfaced in hospital rooms.

      Whey couldn't there be a portal with the same UV or whatever light is used to decontaminate people as they leave the room of an ebola patient? It would be like a portable airlock that could be set up and sealed to the doorway of the patient's room. I guess that's too simple to work...but I wondered about it.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • The UV light does not kill viruses - just mold and bacteria - er bacteria anyway, not sure about mold.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah - it seriously does. That's the first thing I do when exposed to a virus is head into UV rays. Of course - that's topical only other than it ups your Vit D levels and creates a sulfur based chemical that viruses can't handle.

      They are using UV at different frequencies, too - not just opening windows and letting sunlight shine through. Different sonar/light frequencies will kill anything not adapted to those frequencies. Look at the laser. All that is, is a light frequency.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply

    • Don't worry about it - it's not like this stuff is widely publicized and unless you do a LOT of research (which I do), you're not expected to know this stuff. I bet you know a lot of stuff that the rest of us would argue against until you showed us differently.

      That's why I hit up experts for info so often, LOL. ThomM is my absolute agriculture and pot reference for example. I never had any ed about horticulture and he's made educating himself in that field a life long effort. Where do I go when I have techno questions?? The OT forum. . That's what I LOVE about this forum. There's people here that can answer questions about all sorts of fields that I have no clues about. We're a pretty lucky bunch to have each other here - good education, good support, and lots of laughs
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
  • Ebola outbreak: Liberia health workers threaten to strike Monday

    I can't say that I blame them - they need protective gear at the very least.
    • [2] replies
    • In a "TIME" article - this was interesting:

      How many times have we seen massive human suffering and natural disasters where money was thrown at the country....and just disappeared???

      We shouldn't be sending ANY money to Liberia - we are sending troops - we should be sending protective health care suits, etc. Cash will disappear into pockets time after time.

      At the same time - it seems to be taking us a long time to get troops to Liberia...we've committed either 3000 or 4000 (depending on what media you read)...but...

      It's been six months since this ebola outbreak began...the number of cases and deaths in West Africa is still increasing. The aid was announced a month ago - why is the reaction time so slow? Why would it take us 4-6 months to react to an "international health crisis?"
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      What a tragedy if that happens. Of course they need protective gear. I read this regarding supplies sent to Sierra Leone

      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/wo...yed-docks.html
      • [2] replies
  • I think one problem is that so little is known about Ebola before this outbreak. I believe somebody posted the previous known outbreaks earlier in this thread. What has happened in the past was usually that a person was infected by animal, and he would infect a few others and that was it. What has happened now is that the virus kept on passing between humans. As it passes through humans, it is bound to adapt so that it could be transmitted more easily. At the same time, the mortality rate should go down as the virus becomes less lethal. However, that does not seem to have happen.

    A virus that lethal can't be transmitted efficiently for ever. At one point, people will get so scared that they will stay at home as much as possible and whole cities will be at a standstill. I believe this was one factor why SARS was controlled in 2003.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • What I meant about timing is that CDC lists the start of this ebola epidemic as March 2014...though it wasn't listed as a crisis until late summer.

      Would be amazing to have a vaccine against this deadly disease. Go science!!!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • An interesting and thought provoking comment re: this article Dallas Nurse With Ebola Identified

    Begs the question, are frontline workers adequately protected? Also, why is there no decon of gear before it is removed???
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      I don't think any ebola cases should have been handled at the Texas hospital. I think they all should be transported to the hospitals like in Nebraska and where the others were treated. They have it down pat. No one else was infected and their patients so far, have all survived.

      As for the decon ... guess that's not part of the procedure when removing the gear, but obviously, I think the difference between the levels is an important point and just more of a reason not to let unequipped hospitals handle these patients.
      • [1] reply
  • @waterotter

    Ebola ruled out in the Ottawa case.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • This political game with the "we can't shut down travel" BS is making me furious. Oh the economy will be effected? Who's? The drug companies? These politicians don't think that having half a population in die off won't effect their economy? People being so scared crapless to use that transportation method they refuse to go there aren't going to hurt that economy?

    We need to have scientists take over. Politicians have got to be the most brick headed humans on the planet.

    This is just like the issue of the poisons we're spraying on our ecosystems. Economy means crap when you destroy the reason for the economy. Sprays mean crap when they completely annihilate the ecosystems to the point they've started chain reaction extinctions.

    I think maybe scientists are very correct that we're splitting into two species - and I believe we need to stop putting the sub-species in our offices.

    This whole fiasco has gone from a little concerning to completely bizarre.
    • [1] reply
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Brave woman, many interesting points - especially about getting blood transfusion from Ebola survivor:

    Dallas Nurse Battling Ebola Says She's 'Doing Well' - ABC News

    Only four US Hospitals designated for handling Ebola - Dallas is not one:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/texas-e...ry?id=26140892
  • Oh holy crap. The WHO just put out a report. 3% of people have ebola incubation periods of 42 days. That's twice the length of time we're actively watching or quarantining. It's also only 98% of cases - 95% are 21 days - 3% are 42 days. Um........
    what's going on with the other 2%?

    WHO | Are the Ebola outbreaks in Nigeria and Senegal over?
  • I can see that if a few more cases occur in Dallas, especially if it involves the general public, the city will go into a "lock down" mode. That is people will be scared to go out except to get essential supplies. But this is probably the most effective way of stopping a potential outbreak.
    • [2] replies
    • Banned
      I tell you one place in Texas I wouldn't go near and that is that hospital. They breached so many protocols that I wouldn't want to be treated there for anything. I know Duncan used a dialysis machine. Can any of the equipment used on him or any of the equipment used by health care workers who tended to him be considered safe, with such lax protocols in place there?

      The CDC said that they are now going to send out a response team for each new case. I hope that begins in Texas ... now ... with this new case.
    • Derek,

      The US has four hospitals with isolation wards deemed as able to handle cases like Ebola.
      I do not understand why patients are not mandatorily sent to them. And, it seems like it would
      be better for containment of Ebola if patients were sent to one of the four.

      What's your take on using just one of those four hospitals?
      The designated ones are listed here:
      Texas Ebola Breach Raises Questions on Hospitals' Readiness to Treat Virus - ABC News

      Dan
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      This is just getting tragic. CDC needs to drop by Texas and take over ebola operations there. What's the next step? Disallow all traffic to and from Texas?
      • [1] reply
  • A news report stated these hospitals don't want to be filled to capacity - one hospital is prepared to take about three ebola patients, even though they have more beds.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      I have zero confidence that anyone giving them money isn't just pissing it away. It's going to go to the government and not where's it's needed. The US sent $140K worth of protective gear and it is still sitting undistributed and unused. I would not send a dime to them unless it was through an well known organization that would actually see that it went where it was needed.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • they should close the borders and not accept any flight from africa imo!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Jody, I couldn't read the story without subscribing. Could you read it?

      ~ Theresa
      • [1] reply
  • I see Yahoo news is running those false ads about Prop 92 that the GMO industry is paying 8 figures to run to fool us into not labeling GMO food. Is the whole world of money out to kill us now? Don't stop those flights - it will interrupt our prosperity. Don't label those GMO's it will interfere with our prosperity.

    This whole planet has gone from sick to extremely twisted.
  • Ebola is like all other epidemics manufactured in laboratories of the freemasonry international health organizations who spread disease in poor countries in order to control and kill the largest possible number of people and make treatment experience on them .. in other words Africa and Asia are laboratory mice of these organisations . once they got disease in Europe and America the magical treatment appears who is often existing before dissemination of epidemic The principle of creating the problem and finding solution And we can see the same thing in politic through armed organizations and fabrication of terrorism for purely economic goals when the human becomes the cheaper thing
    • [2] replies
    • Banned
      Well, I've read my share of conspiracy theories, but this one has got to close to the top of the list. hahaha ... lollollol .... Thanks for the comedy break.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
    • Sorry, Theresa. I didn't have to subscribe to read it.

      Thanks, Dan. Unfortunately, Yahoo didn't provide the full story. I went back to the article I posted, only to find I needed to subscribe or log in. I wanted to copy and paste some of that article here.

      I got it now. Here's the story, note the very last sentence:

      Source: Some Ebola-Stricken African Families Pay Bribes for Fake Death Records - WSJ
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • @Dan (bizgrower)

    I remember clicking on a link that you had posted to the "Wall Street Journal" and I was asked to subscribe or login. I never did see the article.

    The link I posted was also to the WSJ. When I clicked on the link, I got the same message - subscribe or log in. Yet, when I did a google search, I was able to click on the link and read the story without subscribing or logging in.

    Moral of the story: When posting a link to the WSJ, you will be asked to subscribe or log in. Do a google search and you will not be asked to subscribe or log in.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • That's the way you get around the paywall on any of Rupert Murdoch's publications.

      Type the title of the article into Google, and then click through from there.

      This is the reason why Murdoch hates Google so much.
  • Question - how is West Africa ever going to eradicate ebola when they are burying bodies improperly? I've seen how they are "disposing" of some bodies where they simply put the bodies in dug graves without a hermetically sealed casket, some victims weren't even in bags.

    I know the CDC recommends cremation, and that is being done in some instances, but not all. The poor folks burying these bodies have only a face mask and rubber boots on. Sometimes I've seen gloves, but not very often.

    Any thoughts on this?
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Unfortunately, in West Africa, ebola is just part of it. When you're starting out with ignorance, extreme poverty, superstition, traditions, complete lack of a cohesive government moving, like Nigeria did, to eradicate ebola, it's a whole lot more than just stopping ebola. The people continue to do the things that spread ebola and I don't see how they're going to stop it, unless the people actually do become afraid and stay away from others. I don't know how they would do that though. They still have to eat and survive.
      • [1] reply
  • @waterotter
    Unfortunately things won't change until enough relatives and friends die,
    or a military level intervention occurs.

    One of the articles I posted earlier about burial practices talked about
    a guy who took bodies out to an island and buried them there. He
    stopped after one of his crew members came down with Ebola.





    <><><><><><><><><><>

    With respect to WSJ, I bet that after you read the Googled article and then try to click on another article,
    you get the subscription sign up thing.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I wonder if that guy is still alive and well? I also get that "culture" plays a role, but how many more need to die?




      <><><><><><><><><><>


      Dang, Dan - you're right! I guess we have to google each article separately.
  • Jody, I am still reading this... omg. I also have some interesting stats that I will post in a minute.
    I have to feed the Italian and maybe have a cigar. hahahahaha.. .ok, I didn't mean maybe.

    BRB.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Lol, Theresa - Have one for me, please!

      ETA: A cigar, that is! Take your time, don't choke......enjoy! See you in a few minutes.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • I think the aide subject is what is most frustrating. Why aren't these governments taking action? This has been going on for so long. I honestly feel for these people, but struggle with why we (everyone) keep helping.. I know we have to, my goodness, they need so much, but we're chasing our tails here.

    I understand that we cannot police the world. I so get that. However, I do feel that as a world, no one should be suffering and no one should have to live like this when their leaders are living in riches. Including us.

    I don't know the answer.

    ~ Theresa
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Lol. Theresa - I've ran out of thanks.

    Dang, girl, get some sleep. I hope everything is ok there.

    Jody
  • Yes the countries are living purely on aid - and yet the populations are exploding. We can't really justify supporting countries that have no way of self-sufficiency yet continue to double and triple their populations. Now what happens when the global economy tanks? They stop getting that aid and their population is set for complete inhalation because they don't produce the food, they don't clean their water, they don't do anything but wait for aid. This is mostly a gov created issue and the people should be ditching off governments that are keeping them in this astounding a level of abject ignorance and poverty.

    People have to wake up and they have to wake up fast that once an area is pushed over carrying capacity, the only way to contain their problem or lessen it is NOT via aid - it's via immediate negative population growth methods being instituted. Nobody really paid attention to the fact that despite aid there's about a billion starving people in S. Africa. Until now that the poverty and population density and ignorance is causing a global situation. I'm pretty disgusted with our leaders right now - all of them. Everywhere. This situation could have been avoided if appropriate measures for handling poverty would have been instituted decades ago instead of just throwing money at the countries' corrupted, greedy leaders.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • The Dallas hospital now admits that the original patient should have been transferred to a specialized center. Just to illustrate how bad that they messed things up, the Medicine Sans Frontières treated thousands of Ebola patients and had only 16 of their staff contracted Ebola. That hospital treated one patient and two of its staff contracted Ebola. The CDC should have much more proactive in the first place. It will lose a lot of prestige and respect around the world because of this.

    As a long as there is an animal reservoir, Ebola will always be around. This is the same situation as with the SARS virus in Civet Cats. However, there are now stringent procedures in China for handling civet cats, especially with regards to slaughtering them for food.
    • [ 4 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I have not heard of additional cases stemming from the people who were transported to Nebraska
      or Atlanta. Contamination of the planes and transport vehicles is a concern, and I have not heard
      of any issues there either.

      I hope these places are how we contain it in the US. I understand they are limited by staff and available beds, but it seems to me the US should literally be able to contain this to a handful of cases - if Dallas did not open Pandora's box already.

      I do not understand why, last I read, they have the Dallas nurse's dog at an undisclosed location. I'm sorry, but that seems too risky for the greater good. Monkeys and bats seem to be able to carry and transmit the disease and we don't seem to know enough about dogs. If they can carry it, how long
      would it be before one is safe to be around? And who wants to find out the hard way?

      <><>

      I hear anecdotally that local health care practitioners are asking the right questions. One of my employees brought her kid, age 2, in for pink eye and they asked if they've been near West Africa or near anyone who has... And, this: Colorado Test For Ebola Could Speed Up Diagnosis To 10 Minutes « CBS Denver

      <><>

      On a lighter note (assuming they are not really thinking this), I guess the 20 somethings are posting on
      their Facebooks that this is the start of the zombie apocalypse - especially because Atlanta is being mentioned.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Ahh - good points. Did not think about someone moving their pet. No easy answers.
  • Well it seems now that the second nurse grabbed a commercial flight and exposed 132 people to her Ebola. And people wonder where conspiracy theories come from. Jeezus o petes, you couldn't write stuff like this crap. The flight stopped in 3 cities - the only one I remember is Ft Lauderdale, FL.
    • [2] replies
    • If we survive this, I see a movie in the near future. Or maybe Hollywood has already been there and done that?
    • Banned
      Well, I don't see how this constitutes a conspiracy, but it is most certainly stupidity beyond belief. This nurse was told not to take public transportation. She was supposed to be self monitoring. So much for Texas health care "professionals" following protocol.

      In addition, when she went to board the flight, she reported to them that she had a low grade fever. Hello ... did she also report to them that she was an ebola nurse for a dead man?

      They let her on anyway.

      It's spreading in W. Africa due to poverty and ignorance.
      If it spreads here, it will be due to sheer stupidity.
      • [1] reply
  • I've seen an interview with a doctor, on a show last night, she was explaining how ebola is not that easy to 'get'. You'd have to be in contact with bodily fluids, lots of them, otherwise it's difficult to get the disease.

    Or, you can have someone spit on you (like, when you talk with an infected person and a small particle of spit flies over in your eye or something), that would be dangerous but what are the chances.

    I may be too much of an optimist, but I think we'll survive this one.
  • I just saw this, thought it was an interesting read.

    Weed Protects You From Ebola - Sasquatch Glass

    It's not talking about smokin' a fattie will save you. I will admit that is what I thought initially.

    ~ Theresa

    I don't know much about this subject, so would love to hear everyone's thoughts on this. Is it a crap article or is there some truth to this?
    Thanks!
    • [1] reply
    • Written by Medical Director for a medical marijuana company.
      Might be a little biased.

      Their President and CEO is the former Governor of New Mexico
      and claiming it has the potential to cure Ebola - without trials?
      While they are raising investment capital?

      That being said, I don't see how it could hurt - at least ease the pain -
      as long as it is not introduced as a cure and gives false hopes.
      (Until proven one way or another.)

      hicasualcannabis

      Former governor comments on Ebola and marijuana | KRQE News 13
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    Oh ... I forgot ... Dr. Nancy Snyderman, who really should know better, and who obviously could not be trusted with voluntary quarantine, just had to go get her some take-out food. Fortunately, that NBC crew isn't showing symptoms yet, although one of their crew is being treated for ebola. This crew has been at the heart of the epidemic, but think that going out to a restaurant is more important than our health and peace of mind. So now they are under mandatory quarantine.

    CDC boss addresses quarantine violation by NBC News doc Nancy Snyderman - The Washington Post
    Dr. Nancy Snyderman 'deeply sorry' for breaking Ebola quarantine - NY Daily News
    • [1] reply
  • @Dr. Nancy - NO SOUP FOR YOU!
    She could not wait, or have it delivered and left on the porch?
    Who is the person who was with her, one of the quarantined crew members?
    Or her S/O moving freely around town?

    The nurse who flew could not stop herself from flying because she has a slight fever
    and had just treated an Ebola patient?

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1976153

    I don't care one way or the other if Dr. Nancy gets fired. I do know that if I see her
    reporting again, I will always remember and think of her in a negative light.


    <><>
    Another angle on dogs is that people who come down with Ebola symptoms might
    stay away from treatment because they are afraid of what might happen to their pet.

    <><>

    Dan
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Today the head of the CDC is in D.C. at "meetings" and "a hearing" answering questions of the Pres and the Congress.

      Maybe I'm snarky - but seems to me he'd do better by being on the JOB rather than catching the Pres and Congressional committees up on what's going on.

      He should be coordinating with his teams - changing protocols - informing hospitals....not making command appearances for politicians.

      We've gone from a nation capable of taking action - to a country where the reaction of leaders is to met up and talk about the issues.
      • [1] reply
  • That girl strapped to the gurney spent the past weekend about fifteen minutes from my house. We're all just delighted that she came home for a visit.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [3] replies
    • Banned
      Yeah ... well who's going to let a little ebola get in the way of emergency weddings plans? Sorry to hear that Dan. I can say that it would definitely "bother me" if it were my area.
    • I don't think that man is in any danger. He's not touching the patient who is in a full hazmat suit - he's not touching the workers who are hazmat suits - ebola is not spread through the air.

      In fact, it's not that easy to get ebola. If it were, Duncan's family would be sick - the sheriff deputies who went into the apartment would be sick. None of them are. The only cases that began in the US are with the nurses who were in direct contact with Duncan and his body fluids while perhaps not wearing the proper protective clothing.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • That's got to be nerve-racking. Stay safe, Dan.
      • [1] reply
  • Why the hell didn't she pass go and go straight to a hospital??? I really question Nurse Vinson's ability to to make sound judgment calls. Maybe her license needs to be revoked? I wouldn't want her caring for me.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    Maybe they should nuke West Africa.
  • I'm not opposed the right person being in charge. I thought it might be the right CDC director, though. Not the current head of CDC. (I'm in favor of the guy who is now at ABC as Chief Medical correspondent.) Perhaps
    the CDC does not have enough teeth for the job of directing everything.

    Here is World Net Daily's take. They give McCain credit for the idea. Hopefully she'll
    be smart enough to listen to smarter people with the right background.

    Obama Ebola czar: Zero medical experience
  • Good for you, Steve. Stay focused.

    I know it has not been the 42 days, but there have not been reports
    of anybody showing signs of the disease from the Dallas flying nurse's fiasco.
    Usually it's 5 - 6 days for symptoms? and we are about there now.

    The chocolate thing. Now that's something to fret about.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Here's part of the problem, if you want to frame it that way: our system of government - our laws - doesn't allow for a 'czar' to have full control over this type of situation.

    Somebody earlier remarked that the CDC should have stepped in earlier. They didn't/don't have the statutory authority to. I don't remember the title of the article I read about how public health in the U.S. is a state function or I'd post it, but it describes the difficulty the federal government has in taking over something like this.

    I'm not even certain that I'd support giving all that authority to just one person. The damage that could be done could be far worse than the disease itself. I don't know if even the President can legally do everything that people are saying should be done.
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      That's quite true. Apparently they fixed that problem because now the CDC is expected to respond in person with an emergency team within 24 hours, so they can make up new laws on the fly as needed, but they didn't have that power before.

      Did you read what just happened on a cruise ship. Belize found out that one of the passengers was a lab tech at "that" hospital, and "possibly" processed Duncan's blood, and refused to let the ship dock. The lab tech is confined to his room now and they're working on getting the ship back to the US. Belize said no thanks. Not here.

      I think it's time for the staff there who worked on Duncan to just chill for the 21 days. They are causing too much panic, rightly or wrongly. Whether they like it or not, it has just been mandated by Texas.

      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Couldn't you just rig up a dialysis machine with a UV light so it nukes the virus in the blood as it passes through?
    • [1] reply
    • What good would THAT do? Can you remove all visible oil from a car using a pump? NOPE! Can you remove all visible water using a pump? NOPE! They tried your technique(with exogenous blood) to get rid of AIDS! DID it work? NOPE! People try to clean all sorts of things up in similar ways. Does it work? NOPE!

      OK, I have been talking about moving the HORRENDOUSLY LARGE MOUNTAINS(like EVEREST) with these techniques, and how they have all FAILED! So HOW do we remove a tiny speck of dust you can't even see?

      SO, in answer to your question..... Even if we COULD kill the virus with UV light, it would be impossible to kill it in any tube, such as a blood vessel. And don't forget, blood is FAR from the only liquid in the human body and if we removed it all for even an instant, a person would die. If we left even a DROP inside of a person, the virus could survive there.

      ANOTHER thing! A virus is not a TRUE life form. They are called a virus because they hook onto a host to replicate. The virus "lives" INSIDE that cell. THAT is why computer viruses are called viruses. THEY hook onto a host(PROGRAM/FILE) to replicate. I am unsure which cell ebola uses. Let's say it was red blood cells. OK, you have to remove EVERY blood cell from the person, and give them NEW blood. UV wouldn't work because such levels would destroy the blood. If you miss even ONE cell, IT will spawn MANY new ebola viri. BTW I just read an artcle: WHO | Ebola virus disease MEN can have it in their SEMEN for up to 7 weeks AFTER they are cured!!!!!!! SO, you have to remove the semen, and any constituent part(like the female analogue) AS WELL! And WHAT ELSE? Well, in theory, from what I read, you would have to freeze dry the person, to START! Of course, nobody has figured out how to remain alive through that ordeal. I say TO START, because freeze drying only removes water. You want to get rid of the virus as well, that likely WILL survive the freezing. People have been working on that sort of thing for CENTURIES!

      Steve
      • [1] reply
  • Stopping most of the traffic from Africa is EASY! It is millennia old!

    1. MANDATE repurcussions for ANY country violating these laws!(This was SUPPOSED to be the LAW for over 200 years!!!!!)
    2. MANDATE that ALL people flying to the US MUST have a PASSPORT!(This was supposed to be the LAW for over 150 years!!!!)
    3. MANDATE that NO IMMIGRANT to another country can get a VIRGIN PASSPORT(This was supposed to be the law for a LONG TIME!)
    4. MANDATE that ALL limited countries are to have a VISA! (This was supposed to be the law for a LONG TIME!)
    5. MANDATE that all countries violating any such law become a limited country.
    6. MANDATE that all airlines check the passports and visas and restrict all limited countries unless they have a proper visa.(AGAIN, SUPPOSED TO BE THE LAW!)
    7. MANDATE that any airline violating the laws becomes limited as well.

    And THERE you have it! a 7 step plan that would have, up to this point, kept ALL EBOLA out of the US!

    If an African national, that was a dutch citizen, tried to get a dutch passport to bypass the law, they would be SHOCKED to find that their passport is STILL tainted, because of rule #3, and they could NOT fly to the US because of rule #4! Of course, they would never make it to Holland because Holland would probably deny the passage, but the airline wouldn't route them to the US, because of rule #7.

    Steve
    • [3] replies
  • [DELETED]
  • Thanks Suzanne. I didn't know that Carson declined. He's probably not wanting a medical crisis turned into a political one either and decided he needs to decline if he's going to run for office. If anyone sabotaged him at that position, it would mean lives...and maybe a lot of them.

    Friedan is nothing but another flacid politician - doing nothing, knowing nothing, just drawing his salary and taking advantage of the "perks". Klein isn't any different -- he's just a lot more experience at the PR work.
  • Banned
    Canada Will Send Experimental Ebola Vaccine to WHO - ABC News

    I'm hoping this vaccine turns out as promising as it looks ... It's being sent to Africa Monday.
  • What I knew or didn't about Carson's position, is really a very moot point. I didn't know he said he'd decline - or that it wasn't Obama that asked the question. Big deal. I wish he had been asked and I wish he'd accepted. But....that's neither here nor there is it?

    Has anyone caught what I said in one post about the WHO saying that only 95% of ebola victims have a 21 day incubation? 3% is 42 days ...and 2% wasn't even given. Then we also know it incubates in sperm for up to around 3 months. Kewl huh? We have people being tested and released when they can't even actually test in the amount of time they are doing. The US is making diagnoses faster than anywhere else due to technology, but what their doing now, test and release right away isn't going to stop infection if it exists. But it is so much more important to be politically correct than it is to actually protect your citizens. If they had done that with that influx of illegal kids they brought in from South and middle America, we would probably never have had entrovirus here, either. But my god, lets be "fair" and "humane". Right.

    At the time I'm furiously pissed off that people have been so damned selfish about traveling while infected. We just got an exec order that will allow them to detain anyone with a respiratory illness. Now if that gets to mean - detained with "others" - a lot of people will die for having a cold or flu and that just pisses me off to no end.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I don't think they'll use the order unless things blow up here - but with the FDA refusing to allow that new testing device that can tell in 10 minutes instead of 48 hours, and flights all over......and people only being watched for 21 days instead of the possible 42 for infection, I am worried about what they're going to do. I have asthma. What if I cough at the wrong time and end up being secluded in a place with people who are infected with that crap? I don't care if you want to quarantine me at home, fine - but do not take me anywhere that there's other people.

    Kay - they've been more worried about taking care of everyone else before citizens for a long time. Here illegally? You can get a home, food, car, education, medical care. I'm a 60 year old American woman who has paid taxes. What do you think they'd give me if I crash and need help? I don't have kids. What they would give me is a swift kick to the curb. Oh...well I'm in Central Oregon. I'd get a tent, too.

    Sick of this fascist crap. I want my country back.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
  • After Aids Ebola is the virus who is most harmful for present so urgently need to control Ebola & i am not happy heard that us discover first Ebola case because next day it could be found another country so take care about that virus.
  • Oh for God's sake you people and your "conspiracy site" mentality are driving me fVcking nuts.

    It's right on a Government website - and you can get more info on it if you're not sure how to read them.
    Executive Order -- Revised List of Quarantinable Communicable Diseases | The White House

    Here's the amendment from 2005:
    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2005...df/05-6907.pdf

    Now here's what is posted on the CDC website:
    CDC - SARS - Executive Order 13295 - Revised List Of Quarantinable Communicable Diseases

    Notice anything funny? Section C was amended into the executive order in 2005, but the CDC has left out section C on their website, yet section C has never been revoked. THAT is what all the fuss is about. A lot of websites got it wrong........but if you think it's just "conspiracy sites" that are stupid, you have another thing coming to you. Most people have not one damned clue in a a barnyard of clues how to read these things.

    What is also mistaken is that Obama wrote this one. He did not - but he did amend it. In effect, the way it is rewritten will allow you to be picked up about any time you have a cough. What people are freaking out most about, though -- is there is no provision on how long you can be held, or what the conditions of the detainment might consist of.

    Capish?
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      That's the biggest bunch of malarkey ... as discussed here
      http://www.warriorforum.com/off-topi...ml#post9606779


      So that means that people can be quarantined for contagious respiratory illnesses that are causing or have the potential to cause a pandemic OR are likely to cause death.

      But you just keep on saying that this little amendment means that people are going to be detained for coughing and sneezing and a runny nose if it suits your agenda. I can read.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • ANOTHER thing/ Yesterday, I heard some IDIOT, that was supposedly CONSERVATIVE no less, say the job of the director of the CDC is to basically spin public messages to control panic. That is a bunch of BULL!!!!! A director is supposed to DIRECT! They are supposed to effectively manage the managers, and areas, in a larger business. The end goal is to follow their mission statement!

    The mission statement of the CDC(or Center for Disease Control) SHOULD be INSTANTLY obvious to ANYONE! After all, the name says it all. But let's see what the CDC says their mission is!

    Mission, Role and Pledge | About | CDC

    GEE! The idea of spinning messages is JUST NOT THERE! If you can catch ebola from shaking hands, for example, they should say so! WHY? Because it causes people to rethink the idea of shaking hands, and limits the transmission. Spinning an incorrect message is not only not in the mission statement, but actually works AGAINST it.

    ALSO, in their 5 part "pledge", point 4 is "4.Place the benefits to society above the benefits to our institution". The only likely thing I can think of there is that if they make a mistake, have to revise an earlier statement, etc.... That they will come clean and do the right thing EVEN if it irreparably hurts their organization.

    Steve
  • Steve - you mistook what was going on in that clip if it's the one I remember. That was a political stab at the democratic party. It was the Dem party that instated the CDC and it's an election year. Anything that can be used to deseat another party right now will be. Someone just blamed ebola on republicans, too.
    • [1] reply
    • Republicans earlier raised funding a LOT, and the CDC squandered it on senseless things like why lesbians are more likely to gain wait than homosexual men. *******DUH********! I could give you three obvious reasons! One has to do with how straight women often act. One has to do with the physiology of males and females. One has to do with how many men act. But why bother studying it? It really isn't in their mission statement. GRIDS was obviously different. Although it looked like only a homosexual disease, it was a DISEASE that seemed to be spreading.

      ANYWAY, they had NO business researching EBOLA, and it WASN'T given top priority. There are plenty of diseases they COULD be working on! HECK, what about HPV?(Supposedly over 9% have caught this disease, IIRC.) and HIV?(Growing WORLD WIDE) HSV?(A LARGE number contracted THIS!) HRV?(Nearly EVERYONE contracted this)

      If we tried to cure every blasted disease out there, it would take several eternities. We don't have that much time. Does Ireland try to getrid of snakes, and do a lot of research on that? NOPE! Do we spend money advertising vegemite, etc? NOPE! Sorry, but that is how it is.

      ANOTHER thing! A company, that I BELIEVE is CANADIAN, worked on a kind of automatic retrovirus vaccine generator, that I was of the understanding was used to cure the first 1 or 2 patients that had ebola. Why is nobody talking about THAT? It used, IIRC, tobacco plants. The tobacco plants are given a tobacco virus that has pieces from the virus that is to be attacked. The tobacco plant then generates an antibody, and a serum is made from the plant.

      Ebola Virus Cure: US Issues 'Task Order' For Ebola Drug ZMapp

      OBVIOUSLY, the CDC had NOTHING to do with this. The US governmentactually SLOWED IT DOWN in the US!

      Steve
  • Feel very unhappy to hear that because Ebola cause lot of death already
  • Banned
    Here's an interesting story about transmission and dogs, which is something I've wondered about. Basically, they know that the dog receives the virus, can shed the virus in feces and saliva, builds up antibodies, and then clears of the virus, seemingly without getting sick. What is a complete unknown is whether or not it can jump from dog to human.

    Can Dogs Transmit Ebola? Different Approaches Explained - Forbes
    • [1] reply
    • 40 days since a new case of Ebola in Nigeria. Nearly all the people in the US in quarantine are now released. Africa is still a problem area.

      Just a heads up.
      • [1] reply
    • [1] reply
    • Soooo, your Enquirer subscription expired?
      • [ 4 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • Banned
    Ebola case confirmed in NYC. This will likely lead to another lengthy protocol discussion and a bit of a PR mess. Doctors Without Borders physician Craig Spencer back from West Africa (Guinea) is the patient.



    http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/23/health...ase/index.html

    Cheers

    -don
  • Whatever, Suzanne, just whatever. I showed you the actual official site where all of our legislative docs are stored. I showed the history of the action and made no attempt to push it off as Obama was the first guy to write the action. Yet you continue to flaunt websites picking it up and running with it. I'm not even going to look at any of them to see what spin they're putting on it. I don't care. I read the actual legislative history and saw the exact writing and know how to check for relevant omissions and implications in the linguistic structures. So you just go ahead and rattle on about conspiracy sites all you want. I just don't care what you think about it. I really don't. A statist is a statist. The only way they seem to understand shyte from shinola is when something is at their own doorstep. Regardless of you pointless and uneducated stance on this one, I still like you and would rather it come to you and everyone you know thinking I'm reactionist or just dead wrong on this one than to see it come to you getting the first hand education on the dangers of this action.

    I am not against an action that quarantines sick people actually. As I said, I want to know the parameters, though. All of them. If I were suspected of having something communicable and deadly, I would gladly quarantine myself. No questions asked. Being that I am not against forced quarantine and I would willingly submit, maybe you should ask yourself if you are really judging my reasoning for not liking this particular order accurately, or if you are just thinking I'm against it just because Obama scribbled a signature on a rewrite. Does it make you feel any better that I didn't like the original order either - for the same reasons?
    • [2] replies
    • I have to say I don't approve of calling others "uneducated" but then I have no idea what a "university chief justice" is....so....I'm out.
    • Banned
      Well, I still like you too Sal, regardless of our differing opinions. That never changes. It's just conversation.

      As for the breaking news on the Doctors WO Borders patient in NY, he did self quarantine as soon as he felt sick. I hope this guy makes it too. It looks pretty good so far, with all but Duncan surviving this in the other hospitals. So far, the Texas case is the only that has spread it to someone else. Hopefully, his fiancee won't get it.

      One thing I'm happy to see is that instead of an outright travel ban, anyone coming here from those areas will now be monitored for 21 days.

      Interesting article on the 9 people that have been treated in US.
      http://www.forbes.com/sites/dandiamo...e-other-eight/
      • [1] reply
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Banned
      So is the freelance NBC journalist. That seemed fast. Maybe not to him, but to me.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • This picture should allay some fears about people who have been infected by Ebola. It is only 2 weeks ago when she first came down with a fever.

      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Banned
      Good grief. Says a lot about some of our society.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • From the above link:
      Quelle surprise on both counts.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    Went to two of my grandchildren's birthday party yesterday. My daughter is an emergency room nurse. I asked her if the hospital has trained for ebola. She said yeah, but it's just more or less a joke. There is no special isolation floor for them, there was very little real training. The suits they issued were like the one that the second Dallas nurse wore when she got infected (exposed neck, permeable). Basically, her hospital would be as prepared as the Dallas hospital was in the event that an ebola-infected person arrived at it. It's a very large hospital system ... not some small, little known hospital.
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah, kind of like that gasmask shown in one of the "ebola prep kits" earlier! The suits the medical community recommends for ebola don't actually have gas masks, but scuba type gear, because the ebola virus is small, and any contact with skin could end up getting where it could spread the disease.

      Steve
    • [1] reply
    • FRANKLY a house quarantine isn't really any good anyway. Suppose someone knocks on the door, or breaks in. EITHER could happen.

      But who is SHE! She went into such a battle zone WILLINGLY and now says a mere 21 day quarantine is inhumane! That is better than the astronauts got! That is better than patients get. It is better than they plan to do with soldiers.

      Steve
  • The double talk deception is starting to unravel! A local talkshow host noticed it, and an authority called attention to it ALSO! Probably few viruses really spread via air. The common cold, for example, doesn't spread that way. OH, it CAN spread OVER the air, in droplets, but really not via it. And the same is true of ebola. HECK, the prevalence of purell should prove this! They find that it works well, and provide it because it cuts costs, and it does *****NOTHING***** to affect airborne stuff breathed into the lungs. It works by removing moisture from the hands, etc, which helps to kill pests THERE, and prevents spreading any such infection.

    They, WHO, CDC, DOCTORS, etc..., say ebola CAN be spread via water droplets, and can live for DAYS that way! The fact is that the entire digestive, AND respiratory track, have water THROUGHOUT! And coughing, sneezing, shaking hands, etc... Spread virus primarily through WATER, and not the air. Of course, you might not notice it, because it can seem almost like vapor, and is often below a level that can be perceived.

    Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Hospitalized Patients with Known or Suspected Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever in U.S. Hospitals | Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever | CDC

    CDC admits droplets from a sneeze could spread Ebola | New York Post

    Steve
  • That nurse said she was okay with being quarantined at home, just not in facilities (tent) that they had put up in a parking lot for her. Then they let her go home and she takes off -- same as that other doctor did.

    Kay - I saw that about her being CDC, too - and from a look around, it's accurate. Most people will dis it though because now every "conspiracy" site on the net has picked up the story.

    What also is being ignored and is on either the WHO or CDC website (can't remember which I saw it on, but it's probably on both if you look for it --
    95% have an incubation of 21 days
    3% have an incubation of 42 days - literally twice the normal time.
    2% -- nobody's said a word about what the other 2% is all about.

    Just saying - 21 days might not make much of a difference in the long run for containment anyway if one of the 3% is out running around.

    Also - they are finally admitting that ebola can travel up to 3 feet in the air. That's via aerosol and not actually "airborne".

    Lastly - I just heard that Flint, MI just got its first case. That's the city I was raised in a suburb of, so very curious to find out if this was just crap or if it's true. Off to find out if it's true and what's what, though.
    • [1] reply
    • I was GOING to talk about the 42 days BUT, when I looked up a reference, some sites belittled it and one said a COUNTRY shut itself off in a country wide quarantine for 42 days or twice the incubation period. STILL, diseases are NOT precise! HECK, people have been known to get reinfected by some hidden vector in MANY diseases.

      As for conspiracy sites? I DOUBT sites WANT to be (fake)"conspiracy theory" sites! Wouldn't one think that if there were a REAL conspiracy, they would report it? And there have been SO many conspiracies! And they are getting MORE obvious and have FIRST PARTIES saying they will happen and saying that they WANT them to happen and even DEFENDING THEM! Yet people STILL don't want to believe!

      Steve
  • Just checked and found that 10 people in MI are being monitored. They aren't sick but came in on flights that are iffy. They aren't under quarantine but are having to check in twice a day for monitoring. Officials aren't saying where they're located though. If I got to put a bet on a square graph of the state, I'd guess Dearborn. Hmmm - where's a bookie when you need one?
    • [1] reply
    • I think it is accurate. For one thing this woman is becoming a darling of MSNBC with talkers like Maddow loudly condemning the Maine Governor (who happens to have an R after his name) and talking about her civil rights and blah blah.

      She's baiting the Governor just as she did in NJ. I heard an experienced nurse say today "she better work for the govt because no good hospital would hire her after this kind of behavior".
      • [2] replies
  • I'm going to make an Ebola costume and wear it to a Halloween party, maybe start a flash mob dance to Thriller with a bunch of people dressed as Zombies.That would be awesome.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • WHY NOT? There IS a type of zombie that looks like it has ebola, the last stages ARE obvious, and somewhat unique.

      Steve
  • Banned
    Look like the only viable solution now is nuking the coast of West Africa.
    • [1] reply
    • Well, we STILL have to worry about the rest. If I were king, I would tell them they now have to go into a REAL isolation unit in a hospital, and stay there for up to 42 days. WHY 42? Well, an attendant might have to stay with them, and if the attendant got sick on the last day..... And if they escaped from THERE, I would put them in an isolation unit in a federal prison for a couple years. This isn't being treated like the threat it IS!

      Steve
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I'm worried about the doctor who is fighting ebola - he seems to have a worse case than the nurses had and I remember how Duncan was "serious but stable" and then went downhill fast. I hope this doc is going to be OK.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    So the Maine judge has now changed his ruling. She can now go in public places and plans on dinner and a movie tonight. Can't wait to see the reaction in the restaurant and movie theater. They probably won't have trouble finding a seat in either establishment.

    Nurse praises judge's rejection of quarantine
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • If I caught ebola, the first thing I would do is try to get that JUDGE and nurse to pay every penny of a decent judgment against them. I would even try to get any bias against a ruling against him overturned.

      Steve
      • [1] reply
  • Members of the US military are being quarantined for 21-days when they return from duty in high risk ebola geographic locations, but healthcare workers returning from those same areas (and who most likely have had closer contact with infected people) are not quarantined. Something here does not add up.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Well unfortunately, a judge has allowed a healthcare worker to dictate a state's quarantine policies rather than allowing the state to determine what is in the best interests of the people of that state.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Sorry, m'am, you're not welcome in my restaurant.

    And by the way, I own the movie theater too.
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      It wouldn't surprise me if that happened. She has received threats too, so I don't think she's being very smart.
    • [1] reply
    • Do you realize that LONG after this type of period with aids they were saying the SAME thing about aids? People made/make light of the flu, so it has spread all over. NOW, they have vaccines, so for a time they said give them to the old, sick, and kids, because THEY are more likely to DIE. When they came up with the antiretroviral, I felt that what has happened would. They would just keep with the old PC laws and let it spread.

      And HEY have YOU had sex with a person infected with HIV? You may NEVER know, until you die. Healthcare workers are forbidden to even tell a spouse. And apparently they don't consider marriage to mean anything to a couple, so either person can freely go out and have sex with someone else. But DON'T WORRY! I hear you can hide it from everyone for less than $13/month!

      Talk like you are spouting here is similar to that. So far, at least with the trials, they appeared to have some good luck, so I guess they may start officially saying what they are only now strongly implying publicly, and say that ebola is no worse than the flu.

      Steve
    • [1] reply
    • Of course it was silly - but no more silly than quitting a job rather than take a 21 day leave to calm the fears of students and/or parents. What isn't mentioned is though the teacher has worked previously for the diocese she was NEW to that school this year.

      It's not some poor teacher losing her career - as she and her doctor husband plan a return to Kenya next year.

      It should be clear to anyone with a working brain that ebola is not "spreading" in the US. That said, it's not surprising the level of fear people have when you consider the media hype and the political posturing that has occurred.
      • [1] reply
  • A comment dissing repubs on election day? Swank. And the commentary is FALSE.

    Ethiopia had a outbreak (right next door to Kenya, not continents of space away) but they were able to squelch it. Kenya just had a first ebola death (arrived on a plane) and it has been fighting Marsburg, which for all intensive purposes is the same virus.

    As far as I'm concerned - since Ethiopia actually had a pretty healthy little outbreak of the stuff going and managed to stop it -- maybe we should be listening to them tell US about how they did it. Ya think?
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Had a similar conversation recently with someone who insisted that an enterovirus was being brought in by illegal immigrants. I couldn't find any credible source that didn't deny it. He couldn't find a single credible source to support it.

    Nonetheless, he remains certain that it's coming in from Mexico and parts south via illegals. Why? "They couldn't say that so often on the news if it weren't true."

    Yeah. And according to Abraham Lincoln, nobody ever lies on the Internet...


    Paul
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Funny. Just let night I was talking to my Mom. Her next door neighbor's son has come down with whooping cough last 2 weeks.

      it is really , really bad. He is 58 yrs. old. It has caused him to blackout everyday for last week.

      Both he and his mom are convinced that it is from some of the illegal children immigrants.

      They are both HUGE tea party Conservatives and they go off on these diatribes

      I just do not see evidence to point that this could be attributed to these children
      • [1] reply
    • I don't watch the news. (Also don't read Jones and only an occasional Brietbart). I watch the Global incidence maps.

      It's not from Mexico - it's hot in S. America - and was hot when they brought the kids in from there. Suddenly we've got it covering the country. Mexico got hit after S. America and the US. It spread real fast and if you trace back any news to some of the first hot spots in the US it was where they dumped the illegals. Not proof, but pretty good evidence to me. Better than a news source anyhow.

      Kenya and Uganda are getting hit by a new one not identified yet - they're just calling it "bleeding fever" on the maps. 5 cases between the two countries, so that's what I've got my eye on now.

      Dengue fever seems to have come in from the Far East - I don't think that one's usually deadly, though. India is covered with it right now.

      Avian flu is all over Eastern Europe and over Russian borders. Haven't seen it spreading anywhere yet - one or two in spots in Asia, but they seem to have died out instead of spreading.

      Can't figure out where all the EEE in the Eastern states came from - seems either Europe or just right here.

      The incidence maps take precedence to me over any news source. You can never tell what agenda a news source might have. But you can watch a disease spread.
  • Steve,Statistically, the most likely source would be air travel, as there are a lot more people coming into the country that way than on foot over the Mexican border. That assumes, of course, that this isn't a domestic resurgence of the same virus that's been here for decades.

    A few things on the question after that. First, is there any evidence that incidence of this virus is higher among illegal immigrants than the general population? Is it higher in Mexico, or other countries to the south from which the majority of these people come?

    If so, then the concern may be justified. If not, it's just xenophobia looking for an outlet. The screams that ebola was coming in over the border pretty much fit the latter category.

    Just as an aside, higher incidence among a population doesn't necessarily mean they're the source. People in tightly packed quarters, who lack decent nutrition and hygiene facilities, are likely to suffer higher numbers of cases of contagious diseases than those in better conditions.

    Then there's the matter of populations that have no antibodies, due to having never been exposed to a disease. See: Native Americans and smallpox.


    Paul
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I think the only mention of ebola coming over the border has been in a case like the one from Africa. He COULD have flown into mexico, and come across the border, if we stopped flights but still just let people cross into the US. And that IS a legitimate concern, even if it hasn't happened yet. Still, to the best of MY knowledge anyway, ebola is primarily an AFRICAN concern. NOT because they are black, or because of any conspiracy, it is simply that way. We don't expect a person only exposed to people on this continent that have only traditional diseases to ever spread ebola. In Africa, they also have African sleeping sickness, malaria, elephantiasis, etc... We may have things THEY don't like, and Australia ALSO has odd animals, poisons, etc.... No place is perfect.

      You would hope most people flying in are from countries where they would have such illnesses taken care of there. ALSO, you would hope the US would be more careful if there were a local concern, and the lack of THAT is what triggered the ebola scare. You see, given the above two expectations, it would be less likely by plane. The exposure of those in the US, to ebola, could have easily been prevented.

      Steve
  • Suzanne - it's about like any other flu. There are those that react violently to it and a few who die from it, but the percentages are very low. No more scary than any flu from my take on it. I was just basically telling what I watched go on in the incidence maps. It's actually burning out right now.
  • Ummm... If it's coming in via illegal immigrants, why is that southern border not a "hot spot?"
    • [2] replies
    • Actually, if it came in from mexico yesterday, it could EASILY be spreading through MAINE today! ALL THE WAY on the other side of the country!

      WHY? Because they are now FLYING people that cross the border, OBVIOUSLY into southern states as far from main as California, over to NORTHERN states. WHY? I have a theory that I think may explain all this garbage, BUT..... OH WELL. ICSAWLM!

      Illegal immigration affects western Massachusetts | WWLP.com

      Not quite maine there, but it is a relatively short hop to maine from there.

      So YEAH, you can forget about this being so easy to confine and track now.

      Steve
    • Because, although it was not advertised by media - many of those kids were flown in here. Why is Mexico not a hot spot either?

      I'm not saying I've got cause and effect here - just what I saw. It was in S America - then America and Europe, then it continued to spread from there, now it's burning out. It jumped from SA to NA and Europe at about the same time skipping anywhere in between and that was just when the kids were transported in here and then unloaded in different cities around the country. That does not mean that legal travelers weren't how it got here, though.

      The co-occurrence may have been coincidental. Seeing that a lot of those kids were sick when brought here, I doubt it was, though. I think that they were being shipped elsewhere, too. That wasn't just "illegal immigration" in the raw - it was a humanitarian effort because they were getting slaughtered down there. It was a "war" (criminal, not political) zone. Not sure if they've contained it yet or not. Still in all, they should have screened those kids better before flying them around like that.
  • Steve,

    One would suspect the folks who flew in to be a bit better off than the ones walking across the border, or coming in hidden in trucks. They wouldn't be the most likely candidates for spreading disease.

    Regardless, if it's a South American source, it wouldn't necessarily (or even likely) be confined to illegals. This isn't exactly one of those "only strikes the poor" viruses. And it wouldn't light up the security screenings like ebola symptoms.

    If Sal is right that it's primarily hit South America, rather than Central America, the illegal immigrants are unlikely to be the source anyway. The majority of illegals coming over the Mexican border are from Mexico and Central American countries.

    If Sal can show me a strong correlation between incidents and location of illegal immigrants, I'd take that seriously. That's Real Data. You're just treating all possibilities, however remote, as being of equal or similar probability.


    Paul
    • [1] reply
    • There was a border control agent who was interviewed when the biggest number of kids were coming across and being relocated throughout the country.

      He said it was risky and SAID there were two "receiving centers" where people are sent when get across the border that had been close to visitors due to diseases of the kids in those centers.

      Don't know how true it was as I didn't see any followup - but it did occur to me at the time how stupid it was to move these new people all over the country and into hundreds of different schools so quickly.

      If they did carry a deadly disease - it would have been an epidemic HERE by now.
      • [1] reply
  • Kay,

    Did he mention what diseases were involved? Assuming it was true, of course, that would be important to know. Along with how well the quarantine was administered.


    Paul
    • [1] reply
  • Thom,

    Thanks.

    This one gave me a chuckle:Wanna bet the Fox News crews would deny that?

    Fox has this interesting way of starting out with things like "gave or exposed," which people will read as "the agents got sick with." If every word in the Fox story were true, it's still not anything to be getting jumpy over. Treat the kids and get on with whatever plan there is for relocating them, whether to their home countries or somewhere here.

    The interesting thing is, Fox is famous for taking the worst possible "What if" position, and none of that one is all that big a deal.

    Nothing in either story about enteroviruses.


    Paul
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I thought that one was pretty funny myself.
      No not for us, but I bet the border agents (or whoever is dealing with them) aren't real happy over it. I had scabies before and though not life threatening the itch will get to you after a little while. I also had a dog that came down with Sarcoptic mange which I was able to cure at home and led to one of my most profitable websites that at the time was number 1 in google, bing and yahoo for it's selected keywords The thing with scabies and mange is they are both caused by mites. A preparation or soap containing sulfur will kill the little buggers right quick.
      Fox is pretty good with sensationalism as are the other 24 hour news stations (I guess, I really don't watch any of them).
  • Sal,That last is a really good question. One would think the kids coming in on foot, with the conditions they lived and traveled in, would be more likely to have it. And, because of the close quarters and poor sanitation, to spread it.

    Even the Fox article Thom pointed to doesn't say anything about it.


    Paul
    • [1] reply
    • But the kids walking over the border are mostly Mexican - not South American. The SA were flown in - the Mexicans are walking and Mexico didn't have any Entrovirus until after the US got it. Guess someone got it here and went home
  • Thom,

    Yeah. Network news was the only reason I had cable after a while. It finally got so bad I dumped that and get the news online now. I've also started hiding or unfriending people on Facebook who post a lot of really angry and inflammatory political memes.

    On the flip side I've found a few people who can disagree intelligently, and those are folks I pay attention to on a regular basis. Hash through some of those discussions and you can end up somewhere near the truth. Or at least not as far from it as you started.


    Paul
    • [3] replies
    • That is what politics used to be about. Now it's just "We're good, they're bad" from both (all?) sides. And who is it that suffers for this bickering? Certainly not the ones doing the bickering.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • I never got into the network news. Well that's a lie. I did watch it a lot during the Viet Nam war. After that it's always been local news. But like you now it's mostly the Internet.
      Facebook is hysterical I think. A lot of the time it seems like people start loosing IQ points (including me at times) as soon as they log in I do think I've gotten better with not posting the angry and inflammatory political crap on facebook. Truth be told I'm much happier on days when I don't see or hear any news and don't think about politics at all.
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      That's the problem with this particular little bit of news. It's very difficult to research it and get information from reliable sources on the Internet. If you Google enterovirus and immigrants, the results are literally flooded with right wing propaganda blogs with headlines like "Obama complicit in the murder of children," "Obama should be hung for what he's done" and yada yada yada ... It was the same with ebola... it was as if Obama literally invented ebola as a present to the US.

      There is very little material, even on the CDC site to suggest a real correlation between this little bout of entero and illegal immigrants. The dubious blog reports all suggest that it is caused by the illegal children that have recently come here. Without real data, who knows? But enterovirus is as common as the cold and flu and has been here for decades.

      The bloggers all support their theories with the fact that this outbreak, which wasn't as deadly as the common flu is annually (by a long shot), started in August/September, which was when the children came here. Well, that's also the beginning of the school year, which is the beginning of colds and flu spreading because children can now share their little bugs with all the other children, who then take it back home to their parents, who then take it to their workplaces.

      Whenever the conservative or the left wing bloggers flood the Internet with "news" you can bet that it's politically motivated and not as likely to be based in fact, and what topic is more political right now than illegal immigration?
  • Sal,

    Are they Mexican? Or Central American?

    The impression I got from the second article Thom linked to was largely CA, which is a good chunk of the illegal immigrants coming in over that border.


    Paul
  • The kids flown in were South American. Trying to remember which country - I think Bolivia? I'll have to go back and look at a map, my SA geography is not acute. Plus - it's burned out down there now so I'm not sure if I can pinpoint which country now that it's no longer showing as infecting SA.

    Right now all that's going on in Central America is ChikV - and it's in El Paso now so skipped Mexico on that one - as far as any being reported yet anyhow.

    All that Mexico has right now is Dengue - not sure where they got it...it's all over India, Pakistan, Malaysia and China and a few countries out that way. I didn't realize Dengue was such a strong virus but there's people dying of it so I guess it's a good one to keep out of here if we can. So far so good.

    Edit: Also - I think I said Ethiopia kicked their Ebola - and I meant Nigeria. Libya is still getting hammered, though.
  • People are moving around the world now. You're going to get diseases spreading - illegals or no illegals. I believe entro was brought here with the SA kids. They were in bad shape. I don't believe it came over the Mexican border. If Dengue ends up in the US near the border - that I will believe was brought in via that border - the outbreak isn't that far south of our border and there are people crossing there. It would be stupid to think that something won't get shuffled. It's flu season for cripes sakes.

    Illegals do bring in diseases, that's why we have immigration laws (that are being ignored), but every disease we're getting hit with isn't being brought over that border. Ebola wasn't. Entrovirus wasn't that I can tell because we had it before Mexico did - those kids from SA were the most likely source of that one. If we get swine flu - from what's on the map right now, it will be coming from the Europe/Russia border areas.

    The "conspiracy" sites are right that we need closed borders - for a lot of reasons, but just because we get a virus going around it doesn't necessarily mean the illegals brought it in. If anything is coming over the S. Border besides Dengue right now - it's not Mexicans coming over the border bringing it.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      It didn't really have to "come" from anywhere. It's been here for decades. I would like to see all the legitimate news sources reporting hundreds of SA kids in our US hospitals with it, since they're allegedly responsible for it. That just hasn't happened though.

      I am with you on securing our borders and the issue of illegal immigration. I don't think that citizens of this country should have to compete with illegal immigrants for jobs and services. Some politicians say that we can't afford the SNAP program so our poorest children have something to eat, but we can afford the huge financial burden that illegal immigrants put on our schools and support systems. You want an eye opener ... just read Mexico's immigration policy. In fact, I think we should plagiarize it ... just cross out Mexico and write in US.

      I just don't think that scare mongering and inaccurate information about an extremely common disease is the way to handle illegal immigration.
  • It is very surprising and very serious issue for US. Ebola has to be stopped from spreading.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Quarantines should do the trick. Unfortunately, the mainstream media has lead us to believe that quarantines don't work. Our elected politicians are making the same argument. According to a recent poll, about 80% of all Americans believe in quarantines. I find it odd that they're going against the will of the American people. They're supposed to work for us. We don't work for them.
      • [1] reply
  • The "scare mongering" has stopped. We're still getting possible cases in, but they aren't being broadcast anymore. Probably because of the intense call to close the borders because of it.

    Our immigration laws aren't that much different from Mexico's. Our leaders are actually in violation of our laws by not closing the border. Disease is one good reason. Like you pointed out, though, there's all sorts of good reasons. National sovereignty is one of them. You're not gonna hear Hollywood screaming for it, though - those hollywood rich are employing illegals as domestics very cheaply.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Banned

      They are quite different in numerous ways. Much stricter than US Immigration law. Fact is, the rich people want illegal immigrants to serve as their gardeners, nannies, senior care providers, farming and any low paying, dirty job that Americans don't want to do.

      And in the Mexico Constitution:

      • [1] reply
    • YEAH! One unwritten law of countries is THEY HAVE BORDERS! What are the lines on maps? BORDERS! What makes a state a state? BORDERS! During a fight, what is the goal? PROTECT THE BORDER!

      Perhaps the two main goals of the coastguard are to effectively protect the border of US waters(waters within a certain distance of the US), and maintain certain laws within it.

      The US has had an immigration policy since sometime around the mid 1800s. In the earlier period, you could basically come here, say you wanted to be a citizen, and that was it. NOW, it is SUPPOSED to be harder. But it is that way with MANY countries. Is there a SINGLE country in all of Europe where you can merely walk in? There IS a kind of international law that allows you to become a refugee. A LOT of countries comply. Germany, Britain, Denmark, the US, etc..... But even THEN, you don't just walk in.

      But HEY, the current "US" really wants to OWN people, rather than have borders. If you are in the US, they will claim up and down you have to pay your "fair share" for resources in the US. Never mind that most of them were ones they didn't pay for. NOW, they say you should pay for being a citizen, at least if they can't make the resource argument.

      It IS ironic that we are paying for being citizens at a time when they say that a citizen really doesn't have any rights. Property may be crossed by various people, money is taken to pay for people that don't pay into the system and came here illegally. Even with voting, the machines change votes, and dead and illegal people are allowed to vote.

      Steve
      • [1] reply
    • [1] reply
    • The ironic thing is that if they showed the suits the care they show patients, the suits would be WORTHLESS!

      Steve
  • The Global Incidence map shows that there's a few places that up to 100 people (that one was Conn or a bordering state) are being monitored for it - not sick, just a flight from the right place to monitor. I haven't looked up any newspapers in those areas to see what the locals are saying about it. I'm sure there's at least a few editorials going on, though.
    • [1] reply
  • Seriously. I laugh when I see people point out one news source as "propaganda". These people do NOT understand that our mainstream news media is all corporate news. That means corporate owned, not journalists. They report what they are told to report, so whichever spin they take is directed by the corporation, not reporting resulting from active investigative journalism.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      As opposed to the true "journalists" with ebola keyword on the front page 32 times and over 20 ads plastered on their homepage. lol.

      Anyway ... Corporate news reports sadly that the Dr. who just arrived Saturday in Nebraska has died.

      http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...alia/19162043/

      It appears that he had a negative Ebola test on the 7th and then it was positive on the 10th and didn't get here until the 15th when he was already in "extremely critical" condition.
      • [2] replies
  • I do have a problem with some of the "reporting" that's going on in regard to all this. Just got an email with the headline "2nd US Ebola Fatality".

    It is not. We have had no US fatalities. We had 2 people who either came here or returned from Africa who just happened to die on American soil. But so far not one person has caught Ebola from another person here in the US directly.

    The sensationalism going on with this whole thing reminds me of why I hate the media and never watch the news.
  • I'm inclined to agree with that view, Suzanne. If people have this going on and they refuse to change what they are doing to stem it, there's not a lot that anyone else can do, either. I just hope that any flights out of those areas are coming under enough scrutiny to keep the spread light to none. I do feel that anywhere that has not been able to at least contain infection should have flights banned by now, though. If they aren't responsible enough to contain a massive outbreak, we shouldn't be forced to feel they have "rights" to just go wherever. That issue doesn't sit well with me at all.
  • Ho crap. This ain't good. Blood samples suspected of ebola infections ....stolen by bandits.

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/bandits-gu...105900372.html
  • Banned
    Good news on the vaccine being developed

    First Human Ebola Vaccine Trial Shows It Seems to Work - NBC News

    They plan on vaccinating health care workers by January

    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]

Next Topics on Trending Feed