Challenges of Selling Direct Response Advertising on Main Street
I do not dispute the advice to the chiropractors.
But it suddenly struck me, "why were all of these newspaper and yellow page salesmen trained in me-to brand advertising? Wouldn't the newspapers and yellow pages at some point have caught on that direct response was better for the customer? That they would sell more advertising if the ads were producing more for their clients?"
And then something profound happened. I started to think that maybe the newspapers and yellow pages were not as stupid as we direct response people have made them out to be all along. The big companies do not have their clients' best interest at heart; they have their own best interest in mind. You see, I think it is easier to SELL me-to brand advertising.
What is the easier headline to sell:
YOUR FIRM HERE
-or-
PAIN HEADLINE HERE
I believe it is the former headline. What attorney doesn't like to see his name in lights? This vanity aspect is sold throughout the me-to brand advertising. For instance, in attorney direct response advertising, we always say, "nobody cares where you went to law school." But that's not completely true. There is one person who cares a lot: the attorney. And he's the one buying the ad.
Beyond sheer vanity, direct response advertising has another barrier and that is education. Since me-to brand advertising is what these clients have known, you as the direct response salesman have the responsibility to sell the client on why this kind of advertising is more effective. That is actually a hard job. Take it seriously.
The internet has made print advertising less effective. And the internet is more about direct response. It is much easier to measure how effective an ad is on the internet. But I don't think that makes it (much) easier to sell direct response. I think it is still easier to sell people on their name in lights.
I know the argument against this post will be that businessmen want clients, that they want profits. That is true. But there are still two challenges to the direct response advertising salesman:
1.) Education: How does that click convert to clients and profits? I don't know that our customers "get" this as readily as we assume we do.
2.) Vanity: I think we underestimate how much of the advertising spend in the past was about vanity. For instance, I knew an attorney who spent money on a t.v. appearance with an aging conservative talk show host. He said it was a "gift" to his hero. But when the show came out, he had a party and had all of his friends over. The money he spent on "advertising" was about doing something that fulfilled his vanity. This is an extreme example, but direct response people who strip out all vanity from advertising would be smart to bear it in mind.
Keep in mind that I am not challenging the effectiveness of direct response advertising, only the challenges of selling it on Main Street.
I had this insight when reading some older DR material and I'm looking forward to hearing all of your responses.
People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.
What I do for a living
People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.
What I do for a living