Parallels between sales and marketing
I think I can make something with it.
just wanted to do a sanity check and see how many parallels I can draw between sales (which I am at least a little bit familiar with) and marketing (which I'm not).
So my questions/observations are:
- When tweaking a sales script, you have the attributes you pre-qualified for(that you know of),who you speak to
and what you say.
Supposing you did do your research, in general marketing are there any parallel to buying signals in sales? or will it always be :"alright here's my pitch... close yourself"?
on X.com( and other platforms),it is possible with some elbow grease to track the unfollows: causality could be inferred. But ... even this is not 100% certain: e.g. you can get shadowbanned and so that would skew it. Also people tend not to unfollow nearly as much as they do say "not interested" in cold calling.
- For a long time, I believed the only way was to validate something was ask them to buy. But I feel that finding something in between would be highly desirable.I know you can have a broken "buy now", but are there any other ways?
E.g. When you're building say, a SaaS from scratch, payment implies support.Every new feature means engineering time. So I feel that it's important to get feedback as soon as possible.
I believe that as time goes on, and as Reddit/Facebook/X/Google etc gets overwhelmed by AI content,
people are going to move more and more toward small communities of friend of friends, echo chambers,
On Discord, Facebook, or even fortnite. whathever.These things for better or for worse are mini-cults.
A broken buy button just doesn't seem to me as a great way to build rapport.
- In selling, you typically want the target the guy that's as near as possible to the sale.
Assuming you have all the information, a postponent just meant I screwed up somewhere OR there is a real structural reason like
"I have to get congressional approval before you send PATRIOT missiles to Iraq" (not "I have to think about it/have to talk to my wife/etc").
In marketing, some people just seem to drag the process on and on. In IM, the common wisdom is to build an email funnel with several touches.
Why email? Is it mostly about owning the data but is there a real marketing reason? Can't you just fire it off in one go?
E.g. on X.com, it is possible to reply to yourself, and so you have a built in mechanism to measure click through rate
on a line by line basis (e.g. the first is 100% algorithm, but the second reply will is click through rate).
Everything is already built in, time constraints (I'll send a free XYZ to the first 50 people that replies),are natural. etc.
I suspect it's more tradition and because social media has tons of bots: the conversions gets diluted and email gets inflated,
but I haven't tested so not sure.
Any thoughts?
It may just be a difference in mindset:I never bought off an email list or mail-in ad (but than again, I also never bought off a telemarketer).
So I have trouble getting into the mindset of people that do.
âDo not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise; seek what they sought.â - Matsuo Basho
>> Selling? Then this is the FREE YouTube series you need RIGHT NOW
>> Selling? Then this is the FREE YouTube series you need RIGHT NOW
âDo not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise; seek what they sought.â - Matsuo Basho
Lightin' fuses is for blowin' stuff togethah.
Lightin' fuses is for blowin' stuff togethah.
Lightin' fuses is for blowin' stuff togethah.