Another Google Places Dilemma
I decided to go deep this time. I searched for a "city + grocery" keyword, and analyzed all the top businesses that show up. I made an excel analysis and then graphed it.
I uploaded the graph to a website where you can zoom in to see better. Here it is: Pixenate - Edit photos online, fast and easily - No plugins required.
As you can see, the ranks go from left to right. So Price Chopper ranks #1 and is at the left of the graph. Sam's club has almost the most backlinks to its homepage, yet ranks the lowest.
If anyone's interested, I can post the excel spreadsheet chart too.
But basically, the confusion is here:
- Price Chopper is #1
- It has a pagerank of 6 much like 3 other stores.
- It's Places listing isn't owner-verified
- it has only 14k backlinks as opposed to sam's that has 200k
- 33 citations. 2 other stores have more, but rank worse
- It has 3 reviews, others have up to 22 reviews
- No pictures
- No videos
- 5 related maps much like most other listings
- No review ranking.
- It isn't any closer to the city center than other stores.
I would understand if Green Hills Market, which ranks #2, if it were first. It actually has a verified page with pictures, reviews, a review rank, and a pretty completed general listing.
Anyone have any ideas as to why the results are all over the place? I mean this is totally inconsistent with what we're learning about all this google places optimization.
Need Help With Your Google Places Results?
Let Me Create 50/100 High PR Citations For You!
Just $50/$100 - PM Me When You're Ready