This teaches me not to judge a prospect too quickly. The following thread is from an email campaign I ran. 290 emails to one target niche. 2 requests for removal (very civil). And this...
This is a prospect?
18
This teaches me not to judge a prospect too quickly.
The following thread is from an email campaign I ran.
290 emails to one target niche. 2 requests for removal (very civil). And this...
I'll post it in the order it came in.
Here's the first reply to my campaign:
A couple of notes:
1. My original email wasn't spam. The email was scrupulously in line with the CAN-SPAM act. In fact, the mailing got less than 1% requests for removal.
2. His curiosity, came from three things, I believe.
A. Good copy writing.
B. Relevance. I was as careful as I could be to match my message to his industry. And though I missed (my source gave me faulty info), the argument was coherent for the industry I targeted.
C. Proof. I didn't just make claims, I backed them up.
Ok, I was pushed back a bit. So I sent a fairly contrite reply I thought.
I was sincere about reconsidering my process. I don't like to piss people off. So I am considering how I can tighten things up. Here's his surprising reply to me.
then a critique of my email and my method.
So, I'm following up. Don't know if I'll get business or not. But he's told me in as many words that he's open to hearing my suggestions. And now we're engaging.
Take away - don't be too quick to judge. And it's worth the time to personalize. Even when you're personalizing to the wrong industry.
The following thread is from an email campaign I ran.
290 emails to one target niche. 2 requests for removal (very civil). And this...
I'll post it in the order it came in.
Here's the first reply to my campaign:
A couple of notes:
1. My original email wasn't spam. The email was scrupulously in line with the CAN-SPAM act. In fact, the mailing got less than 1% requests for removal.
2. His curiosity, came from three things, I believe.
A. Good copy writing.
B. Relevance. I was as careful as I could be to match my message to his industry. And though I missed (my source gave me faulty info), the argument was coherent for the industry I targeted.
C. Proof. I didn't just make claims, I backed them up.
Ok, I was pushed back a bit. So I sent a fairly contrite reply I thought.
I was sincere about reconsidering my process. I don't like to piss people off. So I am considering how I can tighten things up. Here's his surprising reply to me.
then a critique of my email and my method.
So, I'm following up. Don't know if I'll get business or not. But he's told me in as many words that he's open to hearing my suggestions. And now we're engaging.
Take away - don't be too quick to judge. And it's worth the time to personalize. Even when you're personalizing to the wrong industry.
- Rearden
- Jason Kanigan
- [1] reply
- sandalwood
- [1] reply
- somacorellc
- Kung Fu Backlinks
- [1] reply
- TimD
- [1] reply
- maxrezn
- MichaelHiles
- Rearden
Next Topics on Trending Feed
-
18