The Ultimate Cheat Sheet For Starting And Running A Business

26 replies
This is pure gold and a must read. A startup Q&A with 100 Answers (and slightly less questions). I hope by #26 you get the point.

The Ultimate Cheat Sheet For Starting And Runni... - The Altucher Confidential - Quora
#business #cheat #running #sheet #starting #ultimate
  • Profile picture of the author internetmarketer1
    This looks really cool. This is a great resource for those starting out in offline marketing.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8434012].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author internetmonkey
    Yeah, that was a great read. Made me think about a couple things in my own business. thanks for sharing.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8435184].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Noctilus
    I agree that by #26, you "get it". I like "Do as many ideas possible. The right idea will pick you." the best. I recommend everyone read this, newbies and experts alike. Thanks for the share.

    And this....
    Should I pay taxes? No. You should always reinvest your money and operate at a loss.
    priceless!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8435583].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author fandbworld
    #21 is pretty stupid IMO. Is a great way to bring in new clients every month.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8435768].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Aaron Doud
      Originally Posted by fandbworld View Post

      #21 is pretty stupid IMO. Is a great way to bring in new clients every month.
      It is relative. Unless your high gross product is only sold on your high conversion website SEO will never be the most effective way to start a business. It will only target those actively looking for what you are selling.

      Problem with that is two fold. If lot's of people are looking you will have lots of competition in which case PPC would be better. If few people are looking you would need serveral sites and products to make good money and build a business.

      SEO can make you money. But you will not build a large business off SEO. While the opposite is true. You could build a large business without SEO. Your site will rank hirer for terms naturally as your other marketing will create the same signals for google that SEO would. So the very process of building and marketing a business will create the same rankings as SEO likely would just not as fast.

      So when you understand that point. The question is should I do SEO or should I simply get out there and focus on the things that will bring me sales today.

      A year or two back there was a thread on this forum talking about how a guy learned that he could create affiliate websites for offline products very quickly. Then he would use trade shows and simple two sided flyers to drive traffic to them. He made more doing that faster and easier than he ever made money using SEO or online means to drive traffic.

      People were not google searching for "woodworking plans" but going to the right trade shows with the right customers allowed him to sell loads of those woodworking plans. He didn't even create anything. In his case he was merely selling someone else's product.
      \
      And the masses on this board were amazed and like always hundreds copied it and made the method, at least for a time, overly saturated. This is the other lesson and it goes back to competition. SEO is overly saturated because people think it is easy. You can sit at home watching porn while some guy on fiverr does it for you, right?

      And you can rank for terms but all the time we see threads on here from someone who wants to do the "rent a site" model who can't figure out why he is number one but getting no traffic.

      I can point this out over and over using point after point. But SEO for the vast majority of businesses has no value. Now SEO can be used as a peice of a larger plan to dominate google for a local search like Claude does for his clients. And it can be used as part a plan to control the information of a topic like sales lion does. But for most businesses it will have little value and is more of an add on vs a focus and unless your product is highly competitive the rankings will come naturally as your business grows anyways.

      Now those of us selling a high gross and highly competitive product must be aware of even if not focused on SEO. But even in those markets a properly build marketing campaign using traditional media will blow away SEO.

      Example: There was a car dealer in DC that was the 3rd largest (by volume) dealer for their brand in the DC market. Yet they learned they sold more than any dealer of that brand in LA and several other large cities. So they advertised that and 3 months later they were the number one dealer in the DC market for that brand. And last I knew they are the number one dealer in the country for that brand. All because they knew that the consumer associated volume (ie being the biggest) with low prices. And people assume that bigger city means more sales.

      For most large businesses and those trying to be large SEO will never drive sales. Stop and think about the largest internet businesses. Did SEO build them?

      Did SEO build Google? Of course not it was competing against other search engines. It was build by having the best results and word of mouth telling people to use it.

      Did SEO build Facebook? No in fact pictures of hot college students did. Trust me that is how many many of us got our first Facebook account. Some guy sharing a profile of a hot chick and us needing to log in. Then we started using it. Then we shared it with our friends.

      Did SEO build Youtube? Of course not. Stupid videos being shared on forums and email did.

      Did SEO build Amazon? This is the tougher one. It was built like the other via word of mouth. But it got it's start simply being the only place that was selling obscure books online. So search helped them but they didn't use SEO directly. It happened more naturally.

      Large businesses grow by creating a great product or service, getting it in front of people, and having those buyers share it with others. At which point they have the revenue to buy advertising both online (banner & PPC) and offline (TV & etc) to scale to the masses.

      And selling to the masses is how you get rich.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436058].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author fandbworld
    I never said it was the most effective way to start a business, but to throw it out the window like it does nothing doesn't make much sense. Obviously shouldn't be the only way you market your business but it is a great way if you know what you are doing.

    Also this point you made

    "SEO can make you money. But you will not build a large business off SEO. While the opposite is true. You could build a large business without SEO. Your site will rank hirer for terms naturally as your other marketing will create the same signals for google that SEO would. So the very process of building and marketing a business will create the same rankings as SEO likely would just not as fast."

    If your keywords are very non-competitive then it could rank. But if you are trying to rank for let's say "Web Design Chicago" or something like that it will never happen.

    If there are a lot of searches being done for a high value product then doing SEO is fantastic. (which you mentioned)

    Besides that point and a couple others I enjoyed the article, thanks for the share
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436237].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
      Originally Posted by fandbworld View Post


      If your keywords are very non-competitive then it could rank. But if you are trying to rank for let's say "Web Design Chicago" or something like that it will never happen.
      Why?

      Also... I'm not sure I understand this article. You said by # 26 we should get it... and what I get from it, is satire maybe. There are only a couple good points in my opinion.

      I started disagreeing from the very first point...

      My favorites though:

      80) My wife/husband thinks I spend too much time on my startup? Divorce them or stop your business.

      81) I'm starting my business but I have relationship problems. What should I do? Get rid of your relationship.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436334].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Aaron Doud
    I agree. I was just trying to expand upon his thought process and show why he would answer that way. He says the answers will not apply to all businesses. But I think this answer and in fact all 100 answers when taken on an individual basis would apply to the vast majority of businesses.

    For those selling SEO understanding why that is true and how to sell around that point would help them sell more. Instead many who sell SEO sell it as if it will be game changing for the business. And for the vast majority of businesses it will not be. To truly understand what your service is (faults & benefits) and how it will better your clients business is the mark of an expert sales person.

    The businesses owner and manager knows, perhaps only subconscious, that SEO will not be this game changer that SEO companies hype it out to be. So would the honest salesperson selling honest and true benefits of SEO make more sales? I assure you that they would.

    "Sir how many customers do you serve each month?"

    "(answers)"

    "The reason I asked you that is I wanted to show you this. (show monthly search results for terms they should be ranking for) I think we both agree that ___ (number searching for term) is nothing compared to ___ (his monthly customers), correct?"

    "Yeah ___ seems very small when put into that context"

    "I'm glad we agree. I'm not going to tell you a bunch of hype. I'm going to give you honest answers. It's what I would want and I am sure it is what you want. Am I right."

    "I've always been a straight shooter son and expect the same."

    "I have too. My grandma would roll over in her grave watching me from heaven if I wasn't. So now I want you to look at this. (show print out of actual google search for term). See _______, _______, & _______ on here? (all competitors that rank above them) Now see where you are? Now I want you to stop and think. When you search for something on google where do you click and how many results do you click?"

    "I guess I normally click on the first few and as few as it takes to get me what I need."

    "And how often do you buy from those places that you click on when you are searching?"


    "Well I guess if I was searching to buy something I buy from the last one. The one where I found what I was looking for."

    "And the vast majority, myself included, do the same. So ___ (number searching monthly) isn't going to change your business. But right now those ____ people are likely buying from _____, ______, and _______. Wouldn't they get better service buying from you?"

    "Our service is #1."

    "Which is why I am here. We work with the best because we want people to find the best. So you would say it not only benefits you to get their business but it also benefits those people searching to buy from you, right? Seems like the right thing to do would be to make sure they find you and buy from you, wouldn't it?"

    "Yeah i get customers all the time that bought from _______ first and they tell me they wish they had come to us the first time."

    "I think it's time to tell you how my team can help make statements a thing of the past......"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436315].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
      Originally Posted by Aaron Doud View Post

      He says the answers will not apply to all businesses. But I think this answer and in fact all 100 answers when taken on an individual basis would apply to the vast majority of businesses.
      Really?

      #1... c-corp? That applies to the minority of businesses. Why have double taxation? If you incorporate, most will go for S-Corp or LLC. C-Corp only has a few advantages that are not relevant to 99% of businesses.

      #2... This isn't 2004 anymore. Delaware is no longer the hot spot for incorporating, people still do because they have old school accountants or lawyers recommending it because it is what they're familiar with. Nevada has taken over, with Wyoming approaching fast. However, the truth is that 99% of businesses that incorporate, are LOSING money by incorporating out of state. If you incorporate in Delaware, and you live in Illinois, you still pay illinois for franchise tax and you have to go through a bunch of loop holes. It is a task far too large for most business owners. Some VC firms require you to incorporate in delaware though, so perhaps that it why he mentioned it.

      5) Should you patent your idea? Get customers first. Patent later. Don't talk to lawyers until the last possible moment.

      This all depends on your idea... and the stage of development your idea is in. If you don't patent, most VC's automatically lower the "value" even with proof of revenue. Everyone should become friends with an attorney at the beginning of their business.


      6) Should you require venture capitalists to sign NDAs? No. Nobody is going to steal your idea.

      Always have NDA's, for employees, certain clients and definitely VC's. If you have a patent already, then you don't need to worry about it as much. NDAs seem to be more relevant when you're offering a service.

      12) How much dilution is too much dilution? If someone wants to give you money, then take it. The old saying, 100% of nothing is worth less than 1% of something.

      See, if you offer to invest into your RV company, and say here's $30,000... I want 30% don't you think that would be waaaaaaay too much dilution?

      I can go through more... but I don't have time lol.


      Really, I think the post was a joke... too many were way too far off.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436362].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Aaron Doud
    C-corp appeals to more but the rise of LLC and it's ability to do both has left it in the dark. But you may have a point that most businesses would not benefit from C but that is because most businesses are not built as businesses. They are build as jobs for the owner(s).

    The core idea behind why the C corp would benefit most true businesses is really a tax problem. A proper tax attorney would show this better but the basic idea is to use a C corp to get taxed at a lower rate.

    First by leaving profit in the businesses vs. being forced to get taxed on it via the pass thru of S. The point being that the corp rate should be lower than your personal rate and if you don't need the money for personal reasons it is better left in the business.

    Second it is about using capital gains to pay yourself with a 15% tax rate vs. your higher personal rate. Think Buffet and most corp executives.

    Third it is about using the the corporation to buy things. Example a Jet. Yes you will be charged for personal use and pay taxes on it but you are only charged when uses it while the business takes the hit. And yes you can do this in other forms but C IMO increases the benefit.

    The other idea behind C is the fact it makes you a "real" business which helps with VC and selling for the big pay day. Like Delaware the benefit isn't as big for small businesses but if they plan to grow and be big you should start off on the right foot.

    I'm heading out and might touch on how I feel on a few others you brought up later. Kinda fun to see which we agree with and which we disagree with,
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436536].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
      Originally Posted by Aaron Doud View Post

      C-corp appeals to more but the rise of LLC and it's ability to do both has left it in the dark. But you may have a point that most businesses would not benefit from C but that is because most businesses are not built as businesses. They are build as jobs for the owner(s).

      The core idea behind why the C corp would benefit most true businesses is really a tax problem. A proper tax attorney would show this better but the basic idea is to use a C corp to get taxed at a lower rate.

      First by leaving profit in the businesses vs. being forced to get taxed on it via the pass thru of S. The point being that the corp rate should be lower than your personal rate and if you don't need the money for personal reasons it is better left in the business.

      Second it is about using capital gains to pay yourself with a 15% tax rate vs. your higher personal rate. Think Buffet and most corp executives.

      Third it is about using the the corporation to buy things. Example a Jet. Yes you will be charged for personal use and pay taxes on it but you are only charged when uses it while the business takes the hit. And yes you can do this in other forms but C IMO increases the benefit.

      The other idea behind C is the fact it makes you a "real" business which helps with VC and selling for the big pay day. Like Delaware the benefit isn't as big for small businesses but if they plan to grow and be big you should start off on the right foot.

      I'm heading out and might touch on how I feel on a few others you brought up later. Kinda fun to see which we agree with and which we disagree with,
      I think the article you linked to really shows the difference between silicon valley startups and the rest of the world... also, I believe the author of the article was using it as satire.

      I also think you're missing what a C Corp really is. S Corp and C Corp are both an entity on its own, and both have the ability to have investors. C Corp can have foreign investors, outside of the US. It can also have over 100 shareholders, S Corps only allow for 100 and under.

      If you leave profit in the business, you are taxed first at the corporate rate, which is before you collect distributions through capital gains, that means 40% tax rate possibility vs. an S Corp advantage of paying yourself salary and collecting distributions.

      If you're doing hundreds of millions a year in revenue, maybe you could do C Corp... all publicly traded companies are C Corp's anyway, but that is exactly why this does not apply to most businesses.

      And you're right... a lot of businesses are just jobs for the owner, which is why the majority are just sole props.... but when it comes to incorporating... S Corp makes more sense than C Corp in 99.9% of situations, and on this forum, I don't believe a single person would be better off choosing a C-Corp.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436743].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheBigBee
    That article was written for the proverbial technology company founder - and not the Warrior. This is stuff I was taught as part of a tech incubator.

    Great stuff, just not the audience.
    Signature
    FILL IN THE BLANKS!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8436952].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
    Great read! A true mirror of what some of us are doing (or trying to do...) right now.

    Kudos OP!
    Signature
    People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437083].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Aaron Doud
    S and C Corporations Create Different Tax Consequences | BizFilings Toolkit

    Ian this article in the C Corp side talks about some of the things I was thinking about but not fully able to explain. And I am not sure of all the rules to make a dividend a capital gain but doing that for a high income person is a huge advantage. Also avoiding the self employment tax is huge. A high income individual with the right tax lawyers is surely better off with C.

    But I do believe i was mistaken on a few rules of C. And unsure on a few others now.

    After checking into a few things I now would say I 100% believe for most companies choosing C in the beginning is a mistake. But once established it may be good to convert to C.

    Honestly points like that I took as his personal opinion. The only real answer to that question (and a few others) should be ask your lawyers.

    Later I may run though the list and see how many I disagree with.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437356].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
      Originally Posted by Aaron Doud View Post

      S and C Corporations Create Different Tax Consequences | BizFilings Toolkit

      Ian this article in the C Corp side talks about some of the things I was thinking about but not fully able to explain. And I am not sure of all the rules to make a dividend a capital gain but doing that for a high income person is a huge advantage. Also avoiding the self employment tax is huge. A high income individual with the right tax lawyers is surely better off with C.

      But I do believe i was mistaken on a few rules of C. And unsure on a few others now.

      After checking into a few things I now would say I 100% believe for most companies choosing C in the beginning is a mistake. But once established it may be good to convert to C.

      Honestly points like that I took as his personal opinion. The only real answer to that question (and a few others) should be ask your lawyers.

      Later I may run though the list and see how many I disagree with.
      Self employment tax would be tax deductible.

      Here's the issue... Before any capital gains can occur, you are taxed at the corporate level FIRST... dividends, distributions, capital gains, whatever you want to call it will then be taxed AGAIN at the shareholder level. So if a C Corp makes 1,000... 350 is taxed at the corporate level and 130 at the shareholder level brings you to netting 520. The same income at an S Corp with highest tax bracket, has you netting $600.

      Now if you are an S Corp... yes, you have to put yourself on salary IF you are active in your business... Salary and wages are offset in your expense report, so that is the highest tax rate you will ever pay. The rest is capital gains / distributions.

      Even at the highest personal tax rate, S Corp makes more sense.

      The only time a C Corp makes more sense for the founder, is when it comes to exiting the business but staying as a shareholder. Of course, other shareholder stuff, like numbers, different classes of stock, etc.

      I suppose it is going to vary based on everybody's situation.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437688].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Lance K
        #50 is rock solid advice 99.99% of the time IMO.
        Signature
        "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
        ~ Zig Ziglar
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437770].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Lance K
        Originally Posted by iAmNameLess View Post


        The only time a C Corp makes more sense for the founder, is when it comes to exiting the business but staying as a shareholder. Of course, other shareholder stuff, like numbers, different classes of stock, etc.

        I suppose it is going to vary based on everybody's situation.
        There are also other tax advantages to C-Corps. I have one C-Corp and one S-Corp. It really depends on the business. But I agree that an S-Corp or LLC will probably be a better fit for the majority of start ups and small businesses.
        Signature
        "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
        ~ Zig Ziglar
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437786].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author digichik
    6) Should you require venture capitalists to sign NDAs? No. Nobody is going to steal your idea.

    Yeah right. One can only wonder how the story may have gone if the Vanderwinkle twins had required Zuckerburg sign an NDA and a non-compete, before including him in their Facebook idea.


    Anytime you have an original product, idea, service, etc., get as much of the protection paperwork in place as quickly as possible. Everyone is looking for that "great payday" and many people won't care that they stole it from you.
    Signature



    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437466].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Aaron Doud
      Originally Posted by digichik View Post

      6) Should you require venture capitalists to sign NDAs? No. Nobody is going to steal your idea.

      Yeah right. One can only wonder how the story may have gone if the Vanderwinkle twins had required Zuckerburg sign an NDA and a non-compete, before including him in their Facebook idea.


      Anytime you have an original product, idea, service, etc., get as much of the protection paperwork in place as quickly as possible. Everyone is looking for that "great payday" and many people won't care that they stole it from you.
      They still got money. The idea isn't what made money. And the NDA would not have stopped him.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437645].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Aaron Doud
    Wall of text: Read or Ignore. It is your choice.

    1. Disagree: Ask a lawyer
    2. Disagree: Ask a lawyer
    3. Huh?
    4. Agree: Build a business before trying to get investors.
    5. Agree: Unless the idea is amazing you'll spend money before you know it is worth patenting. Plus likely a patent troll already did patent it.
    6. Agree: NDA like Non-Competes are IMO worthless. They simply don't stand up in court and if someone really does steal your idea you can still sue an may or may not win. B5 and DS9 anyone?
    7. Agree: Solid advice
    8. Agree: Solid Advice
    9. Agree: Always pay for services and get paid for yours.
    10. Agree: True for most businesses. Market in your network and expand out.
    11. Neither: The answer itself is wishy washy. Hard to have a one size fits all answer to this. Not everything can be a product or service some can only be one or the other.
    12. Agree: There is never too much dilution if the price is right. Every offer needs to be considered individual though which I think is what he really means. You wouldn't give someone 99% of your company for $1,000 but for $1 Billion that is likely a smart move. Between the two is the correct answer. And personally I'd rather hold on to a small part of something big and let others do all the work. See deals like this on shark tank where people give up their own chance to make millions because the company is their baby. Unless you are an author or something like that it should never be your baby.
    13. Agree: You should listen to all equity partners. But from there you have to decide if their advice it worth following. Also he seems to hate VCs. Not sure if that is sarcasm or not on his part.
    14. Agree: Once you have given it a fair shot you need to change your plan.
    15. Disagree: Completely foolish advice. The only thing I remember from my first read through that I truly thought was insane.
    16. Agree: Something offliners need to know.
    17. Neither: This will depend on the business. Updating and releasing too fast could harm the business.
    18. Agree: Solid advice that offliners should know. New offerings to your current clients is a great way to expand your business.
    19. Agree: Over deliver period. If what you give is always worth more than what they paid they will always be your client. Great advice for offliners.
    20. Agree: Especially with the find someone who can do it. Hopefully the businesses you send clients to will do the same for you.
    21. Agree: Above you saw my thoughts on why SEO should always be a secondary thought for the vast majority of businesses. Businesses built online only around traffic may be the most major exception to this.
    22. Neither: Social Media for most businesses should be secondary. You don't ignore it forever but you don't put too much into it. For the vast majority it will not gain business but rather be a way to interact with customers. So "No" is too harsh but the idea behind the no makes sense. But it can't be ignored forever and at least the big one or two networks you will need to be part of. Unlike SEO this doesn't just happen without doing it.
    23. Agree: Be an adult and a professional. Wanna be in Jr High? Go to Jr High.
    24. Agree: Do multiple ideas and stick with the ones that work.
    25. Agree: All of that was true. Even the friendster thing. The chances of you being the winner (Facebook) are small. There are more failures in business. Never reject a good offer for your business unless you are damn sure it's the right thing to do. Most people who reject regret it. But those who do and win truly win big. It's a big risk and one that only you can decide when it happens.
    26. Agree though not every point will apply to all businesses. Also personally growing revenue is bigger than cutting costs in my mind. But you need to be aware of costs and how you could cut them.

    1 to 26:
    Agree: 19
    Disagree: 3

    I overwhelmingly think this is solid advice. I hoped by this point everyone would get the point which was stop over thinking and just do it. Revenue matters everything else is pomp. Do what you need to in order to make money. Period. Till you are making money you don't have a company.

    27. Agree: Revenue (the would be profitable) allows you to have employees. Don't hire people just to hire them but a business where only you work is a job. And you will never scale yourself.
    28. Agree: If your business is solid and you need working capital someone will back you. If you have no profit or chance of profit and the only way you can stay in business is to keep raising money you need to realize you have a charity and not a business.
    29. Agree: Most people get an office before they need it.
    30. Agree: If you can't even get one person to buy from you don't spend money on the business. Just because you think the market wants it doesn't mean they do. You're not Steve Jobs you don't know what people want before they want it.
    31. Agree: If you are building a business money needs to be reinvested. And you don't get taxed in that case. The advice is solid even if clearly a bit sarcastic. You want to make a profit but if using that money to grow makes you take a loss do it. It really isn't a loss if profit is fueling growth.
    32. Agree
    33. Agree: Build a job if you want a huge salary. You get paid when there is profit. More CEOs need to learn this.
    34. Agree: But you shouldn't have hired them in the first place IMO
    35. Agree If she isn't the one don't put mr happy in her period. That's a liability. Don't pick up women at work.
    36. Agree: Toss bad employees fast.
    37. Disagree: I think employees should be aid on what they do. Commission for all basically so they earn their raise by doing more. Tie income to results and be happy to pay them more.
    38. Neither: Specific to Tech start ups and similar
    39. Agree: Most businesses including tech start ups do not need equity holder advisers. Need an adviser? Find a mentor or pay for a consultant. Very few advisers are providing worth at a level you would give equity away. Sorry Tim Ferris but you know it's true.
    40. Agree: Board Members Should be Owners/Investors. Tech is an area where they break this all the time. Wonder how Apple felt when Android came out. Oh yeah that NDA worked well didn't it? (greta example proving earlier points)

    41 to 49: LOL never noticed they didn't exist

    50. Disagree: a full buy out is only something the owners can decide. But like before with friendster you are more likely to lose if the offer is big. And cash isn't always best.
    51. Agree: That is the best use of email. Cold Emails are worthless. People here need to know that.
    52. Agree: Free is ok but free doesn't mean they will pay later. You need the right model/funnel to make free work best.
    53. Agree
    54. Agree: Unless you just want to go and use the business as a way to write it off. IRS man might not like it though.
    55. Agree: Go where your competition and customers are.
    56. Agree: Blogs work for most businesses. Also not sure why he says yes here but no to social media. Seems to be they go hand in hand.
    57. Agree: Volume wins over gross in the long run. Just make sure your margins don't make your business a job. Low margins can mean no money to pay employees.
    58. Agree: For most ideas you don't need a separate business. Just makes accounting nightmares. Only separate if completely unrelated and even than consider Virgin as the counter point. Umbrellas are not bad. Unless they are in video games.
    59. Agree: Your best friend should not be an employee. Your business is not a place to hang out.
    60. Disagree: Not sure you should start with no. You shouldn't disagree with anyone you are selling to. Always agree and redirect. Which is what he may mean.
    61. Disagree: You can agree without saying "yes". If they ask you to strip naked you can agree that they would enjoy that. But redirect away from it.
    62. Joke Question
    63. Agree: An investor you can work with and who will help you is worth more than having an extra 5% equity. Watch Shark Tank to see this happen. Some people take the best deal with the wrong people and others take a worse deal to get the right people. People matter more than money.
    64. Disagree: At least get a DBA at the courthouse. $100 or less can make you a professional business (DBA, bank account, PO Box, etc). Incorporate later. Which may be what he meant even if not what he said.
    65. Disagree: Though gifts are fine tie pay into results. Bonuses are one of the most common ways to do this. Do not just give random bonuses. And for contests gifts are often better than money. People want recognition not always money.
    66. Agree: Though depending on your size a gift basket may be too much. But sending out a gift to clients, mentors, employees, and etc is good advice.
    67. Disagree: Say jack shit unless you are their friend. Business and personal should mix naturally or not at all. You have no idea if he is happy or sad he got divorced if you don't know him personally. So don't say crap. Exception is deaths. Send a card and flowers.
    68. Agree: Two Months of real 100% effect is enough to test most ideas. Two months of not doing anything is not.
    69. Joke Answer
    70. Agree: This is the real answer to 69. People are busy. While your business is the number one prioty to you it is not to Investors or Clients. If they don't call you back give a reasonable time and call them back.
    71. Agree: Most professional CEOs are overpaid idiots. See Apple in the 80's and 90's. Jobs should have been their man always. Investors convinced him to hire someone.
    71 (doubled). Disagree: If you can sell you should be head of sales. If you can't hire someone. His advice is solid for me but not for every business owner.
    72. Disagree: You set the boundaries. If you answered when he called then there are no boundaries. Otherwise call him back by 10am. If the voicemail is serious call back by 8am.
    73. Agree: Always own up when you mess up.
    74. Agree: This depends on the business. But always follow what you think while taking the advice of investors into consideration.
    75. Disagree: Don't borrow from your business. If you need money the business should be paying you more.
    76. Agree: Though two years may be too long or two short you should not try to just buy and combine companies. Sometimes they are best left running separate. You can't know if that is true if you combine without waiting to see.
    77. Agree: Quite when the business can pay you. Otherwise you will be broke and the business will fail. Better to grow slow than fail.
    78. Agree: At agree with what I think he means. Basically your customers and revenue will tell you rather your doubts are valid.
    79. Agree: Competition isn't a bad thing if you can out perform them. If your can't outperform you will fail because even if you have no competition now sooner or later you will if the business is solid. Mayebe even from someone who signed you NDA or Non-compete. Remember neither will protect you.
    80. Agree: you need people around you who support you. A negative wife will lead to your business or marriage failing. So make a choice when it is clear you will have to. Better to happen now vs. when you are worth 10 million.
    81. Agree: Same as 81 but when not married
    82. Agree: Everyone here knows I tell people to start local and bleed it dry before moving beyond.
    83. Agree: Set expectations. His advice here might be extreme but you need everyone on the same page.
    84. Agree: Quoted too low? Not the clients fault do the work and learn a hard lesson.
    85. Agree: You don't need to be a tech to have a great tech idea. You can build it on paper and have it made into what you envision by those who have the skills.
    86. Disagree: Personally I wouldn't recommend buying a franchise period. But if you do make sure it is solid and not only does the system perform but you can make it perform at or above peak.
    87. Disagree: Though his advice is solid for buying a business. It has nothing to do with a franchise. I don't think he knows the franchise business model well.
    88. Disagree: You need to change your offer or your funnel. Traffic means there is a market. They just don;t want to buy what you are offering how you are offering it.
    89. Agree: If you literally have no traffic and are asking how to get some you shouldn't be in business yet. You don't have a business model. If you have some traffic and want more let's talk and see how we can help.
    90. Agree: You will not need a PR firm for a while. But I wouldn't discount them completely but like any marketing make sure you are getting a good ROI.
    91. Disagree: But I think he was being sarcastic. Basically if you ask that question and can't think of any answers yourself you may need to quite. So I disagree with his point but maybe agree with what he meant.
    92. Agree: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting other results is silly.
    93. Agree: Only you can know the answer to this. But if you are competing with your employer you should know the answer.
    94. Agree: That sounds like a customer service mistake. If they called at 5pm on friday why couldn't you return the call sooner?
    95. Agree
    96. Agree: Customers = Money. Investors = Investment Never mistake the two.
    97. Agree: Though the specific advice is maybe a bit too specific for all.
    98. Disagree: Selling a business should be done when it makes sense. You don't want to sell the next Facebook but you don't want to end up the next Friendster either. You have to be smart about this.
    99. Agree: Most of the time this is true. The exceptions make the rule.
    100. Agree: He basically admits his selling early was a bad idea. Strange he gives others that advice.

    Let's see
    Agree: 67
    Disagree: 18
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437644].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Aaron Doud
    Yeah it's not very cut and dry but S or LLC is better for most all at least to start. I agree now... I thought dividends were deductible. And that would change the tax picture a lot.

    Though I am sure there are other forms and tricks the big companies use as even those owned by only a few people use C once they get large as far as I am aware.

    These talks make you realize how important talking to lawyers and experts really is. Tax loopholes are there and that is why you pay someone thousands to save you millions. Might not apply like that to anyone in this room now but good habits like using professionals starts from day one.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8437753].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
    Thanks for the share Aaron. I enjoyed the read.
    Some good points and some I enjoyed taking them tongue in cheek.

    I like #36 about when you should fire employees.

    As to the type of incorporation, it depends upon the business. And, it's not always super easy or cheap to change types of corporations as you have to officially transfer or sell assets from one entity to the next.

    Also, for many small businesses it's best to incorporate in your state because your state may come after you if they think you incorporated elsewhere to avoid paying the local taxes. SO Mr. Colorado man, how much business do you do in Delaware? How much time do you spend there? How much of the year do you live there? What is your business address in Delaware? Where are your cars registered? Where do your kids go to school?... I realize one can have an agent, etc., but it really depends upon the type of business. I bring it up because there are many budding offline consultants here and not incorporating in the primary state may cause headaches.
    Signature

    "If you think you're the smartest person in the room, then you're probably in the wrong room."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8438078].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hiddenhalf
    The cheat sheet says to use a C-Corp. Is this really what most of you are using? I thought the choice would really be between LLC and S-Corp for most internet marketers/bloggers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8822500].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DaniMc
      Originally Posted by hiddenhalf View Post

      The cheat sheet says to use a C-Corp. Is this really what most of you are using? I thought the choice would really be between LLC and S-Corp for most internet marketers/bloggers.
      Keep in mind that James Altucher is playing in the VC type startup world. Some of those points do not apply for lots of small businesses.

      His advice on NDA's, legal entities, and maybe a few other points, may not apply to everyone.
      Signature
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8826164].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Brian Arthur
    Many thanks to Aaron Doud for a good bit of info on the cheat sheet.

    I saw a few points I hadn't considered so all in all it has helped me.

    Thanks
    Brian
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8824457].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mark healy
    thanks for sharing this business start up and running cheat sheet, great questions
    Signature

    Build a Real Online Business from scratch today!
    Get Your FREE Webinar Training Here

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8825405].message }}

Trending Topics