SEO traffic vs Other Traffic

Join a number of facebook groups and add your post.

Get results in minutes!

SEO takes weeks if not month to see results. You must pick low competition words or SEO with not work for you.

If you are looking for organic search engine traffic then you must wait around 2-3 months, but it's depend upon the keywords competitions and work quality.

By the social media marketing you can create profiles and make a huge friend circle, participate in communities, groups then you can derive vast traffic. Eminent social sites, which extremely helpful acquire good traffic alike, Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Linkedin and etc.

You can acquire huge traffic by E-mail marketing, but you have to collect data or you have to purchase. If you have own data that you can run with this technique otherwise you have to pay that is very costly.

According my experience Social Media is the best technique attain good traffic, Promote useful and informative content and make good discussion with others then you can acquire free huge traffic. Using a white hat SEO technique to appear a website in top ranking on target keywords. When your website present in top search engine results listing then you can get good traffic from there also.

It depends on whether what's you traffic purpose.

If you want only traffic volume - then social media is the way to go, though you won't get too many conversions and visitors won't be targeted.

Targeted traffic - Yes, SEO takes time, but results are way better than social media ones. These tend to make bigger email-subscribe rate. Also it will be much higher quality and tend to look for information / buy product,

Laser targeted traffic - as you already heard "money is in the list". Once you have a big list of buyers/high quality subscribers, then money is yours. Whenever you need some - just send a targeted offer and get cash flowing. However, from my point of view, email marketing is the most expensive one (if you prefer to go white hat way with solo ads).

Organic search is slow and steady but remeber slow ans steady wins the race.

Organic search traffic maybe use much time to top position but it 's free, while paid traffic you can get traffic suddenly but you need have budget to buy these traffic if you don't have budget you don't get traffic.

If you want quick traffic then go for other methods, SEO will take 2 3 months to show the results.
btw I love both methods to get traffic. as we do both these thing to get traffic.

SEO is the best traffic generation method but not the fastest. If you want traffic fast, you have to buy ads in search engines or websites related to yours.

Frankly, I can't imagine myself focusing on any other traffic generation method unless I'm building an authority site, in which case SEO would have the highest priority.

It just works, and SEO traffic converts better than others. The onky disadvantage is the time it takes for brand new domains to get traffic.

There is no dicusssion, most of this is frequented by service providers that see 2% of the overall business revenue stream, then you have the retailer view that needs to see 98%. This covers it all - http://www.warriorforum.com/pay-per-...ml#post9578880. In the end you need all methods - there will always be a few who succeed with only one method - it's just a percentage game.

It`s true, SEO is getting more and more time consuming, I am in this business since 2005 and remember how easy was to rank even top competition keyphrases 2-3 years ago yet ...

Alternatives ?
Media Buys
Forum posting
etc.

Organic traffic is important than other and we get organic traffic trough white hat SEO.